Citations

290 Background: Previous studies have shown robot assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) to have equivalent perioperative outcomes to open radical cystectomy. There are few reports that have examined the oncologic results of RARC specifically with respect to node-positive patients. We report the outcomes of node-positive patients who have undergone RARC with medium-term (at least 1 year) follow-up. Methods: A total of 275 patients underwent RARC at two institutions for invasive bladder cancer between 2005-present. We examined the 50 patients with node-positive disease that had a minimum of one year follow-up. Oncologic outcomes, recurrence free survival (RFS), and disease specific survival (DSS) were analyzed and compared to the open literature. Results: Mean clinical follow up in this case series was 29 months (range 12–64 months). The mean number of lymph nodes removed was 18 (range 5–35), and mean number of positive LNs was 3.1 (range 1–12). Overall rate of LN positivity was 26%. Mean LN density was 18%. Seventeen (34%) patients had ≤ pT2 disease and 33 (66%) pT3/T4 disease. At this follow-up, 29 patients have recurred, 21 patients died of disease, giving a RFS and DSS of 42% and 58%, respectively. Mean (median) time to recurrence was 10.2 months (9 months). A total of 60% of patients received peri-operative chemotherapy in this cohort. These findings are consistent with prior reports of such oncologic outcomes in node-positive patients in open series. Conclusions: The oncologic follow-up of patients undergoing RARC with LN positive disease appears to have acceptable outcomes during medium term (mean 29 months) follow-up. As our follow-up increases, we expect to continue to accurately define the long-term clinical suitability and oncologic success of this procedure in this high-risk population. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

288 Background: We report our experience with robot assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) with regard to medium-term (at least 2 year) oncologic outcomes. Methods: A total of 275 patients have undergone RARC and urinary diversion at two institutions for invasive bladder cancer between 2005-present. We performed a retrospective analysis of the 139 patients who underwent RARC with a minimum of 2 years follow-up. Medium term oncologic outcomes including recurrence rates, time to recurrence, recurrence free survival (RFS), disease specific survival (DSS) were analyzed. Follow-up was measured from time of surgery to time of most recent clinical follow-up. Results: This cohort of patients consisted of 108 men (78%) and 31 women (22%) at a mean age of 67.3 years (range 45-86 years). Sixty-one (44%) patients had ≤ pT2 disease, 38 (27%) pT3/T4 disease, and 40 (29%) N+ disease. The mean number of lymph nodes removed was 18 (range 3-41). The average clinical follow up in this case series was nearly 3 years with a mean of 35.9 months (range 24-64 months). At this follow-up, 39 patients have recurred, 27 patients died of disease, and 5 patients died of other causes giving an overall RFS, DSS, and OS rates of 80%, 71%, and 68%, respectively. The mean (median) time to recurrence was 12.3 months (10 months). These findings are consistent with prior reports of the oncologic outcomes for open radical cystectomy. Conclusions: The oncologic follow-up of patients undergoing RARC appears to be favorable with acceptable outcomes in the medium-term (mean – 3 years). As our follow-up increases, we should expect to truly define the long-term clinical appropriateness and oncologic success of this procedure. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

106 Background: Some patients with lymph node metastases experience prolonged survival following radical prostatectomy. The purpose of this study was to determine the outcome of patients with clinically suspicious lymph nodes on preoperative imaging who underwent radical prostatectomy and lymphadenectomy. Methods: Patients with lymph node metastases diagnosed during radical prostatectomy from 1988-2003 were reviewed. Patients with preoperative CT or MRI images were included in the study. Radiology reports were reviewed to determine if patients had clinically suspicious lymphadenopathy (cN+). For all analyses, patients with cN+ were compared to those with clinically negative nodes (cN−). Results: Preoperative imaging was available in 202 men with lymph node metastasis at the time of prostatectomy. Of these 17% (34/202) were cN+. None had pre-operative lymph node biopsy and none had abandoned prostatectomy. At a median follow-up of 11.1 years, PSA recurrence occurred in 50% (17/34) and 49% (82/186), local recurrence in 18% (6/34) and 13% (22/186) and systemic progression in 32% (11/34) and 24% (40/186) of patients with cN+ and cN-, respectively. On multivariate analysis, cN+ was not associated with increased risk of death (HR 1.66, p=0.1). Conclusions: cN+ patients undergoing surgical therapy for prostate cancer may experience similar outcomes to cN− patients. The presence of clinically suspicious lymph nodes on preoperative imaging should not be an absolute contraindication for surgical therapy. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

175 Background: The efficient delivery of adjuvant and salvage therapy after radical prostatectomy in patients with prostate cancer is hampered by a lack of biomarkers to assess the risk of clinically significant recurrence and progression. Methods: Mayo Clinic Radical Prostatectomy Registry (RP) patient specimens were selected from a case-control cohort with 14 years median follow-up for training and initial validation of an expression biomarker genomic classifier (GC). An independent, blinded case-cohort study of high-risk RP subjects was used to validate GC, comparing the performance of GC to a multivariate logistic regression clinical model (CM) and GC combined with clinical variables (genomic-clinical classifier, GCC) for predicting clinical recurrence (defined as positive bone or CT scan within 5 years after biochemical recurrence). The concordance index (c-index) and Cox model were used to evaluate discrimination and estimate the risk of clinical recurrence. Results: In the training subset (n=359), both GC and GCC had a c-index of 0.90 whereas CM had a c-index of 0.76. In the internal validation set (n=186), GC and GCC had a c-index of 0.76 and 0.75, while CM had a c-index of 0.69. In an independent high-risk study (n=219), GC and GCC had a c-index of 0.77 and 0.76, while CM had a c-index of 0.68. In subset analysis of Gleason score 7 patients within the high-risk group, GC and GCC showed improved discrimination with c-index of 0.78 and 0.76, respectively compared to 0.70 for CM. In the high-risk group, the risk of recurrence by GC model score quartiles at 5 years after RP was estimated at 1%, 5%, 5% and 18%. Conclusions: The GC model shows improved performance over CM in the prediction of clinical recurrence in a high-risk cohort and in subset analysis of Gleason score 7 patients. The addition of clinical variables to the GC model did not significantly contribute to classifier performance in patients with high-risk features. We are further testing the performance of the GC and GCC models and their usefulness in guiding decision-making (e.g., for the adjuvant therapy setting) in additional studies of prostate cancer clinical risk groups.

LBA385 Background: Regorafenib (BAY 73-4506) is an oral multikinase inhibitor of a broad range of angiogenic, oncogenic, and stromal kinases. The phase III CORRECT trial was conducted to evaluate efficacy and safety of regorafenib in pts with mCRC who had progressed after all approved standard therapies. Methods: Enrollment criteria included documented mCRC and progression during or ≤3 months after last standard therapy. Pts were randomized 2:1 to receive regorafenib (160 mg od po, 3 weeks on/1 week off) plus BSC, or placebo (PL) plus BSC. Pts continued on treatment until progression, death, or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), safety, and quality of life. Results: From May 2010 to March 2011, 760 pts were randomized (regorafenib: 505; PL: 255). Baseline characteristics were balanced between two arms. Preliminary results are available from a pre-planned formal interim analysis. The estimated hazard ratio (HR) for OS was 0.773 (95% CI: 0.635, 0.941; 1-sided p=0.0051). Median OS was 6.4 mos (95% CI: 5.9, 7.3) for regorafenib and 5.0 mos (95% CI: 4.4, 5.8) for PL. The estimated HR for PFS was 0.493 (95% CI: 0.418, 0.581; 1-sided p < 0.000001). Median PFS was 1.9 mos (95% CI: 1.88, 2.17) for regorafenib and 1.7 mos (95% CI: 1.68, 1.74) for PL. ORR was 1.6% for regorafenib and 0.4% for PL. DCR was 44% for regorafenib and 15% for PL (p < 0.000001). Since the prespecified OS efficacy boundary was crossed (nominal α: 0.0093), the Data Monitoring Committee recommended to unblind the study and pts on PL were allowed to cross over to regorafenib. The most frequent grade 3+ AEs in the regorafenib arm were hand-foot skin reaction (17%), fatigue (15%), diarrhea (8%), hyperbilirubinemia (8%), and hypertension (7%). Updated results will be presented. Conclusions: Statistically significant benefit in OS and PFS was observed for regorafenib over PL in pts with mCRC who have failed all approved standard therapies. No new or unexpected safety signal was found.

111 Background: Trastuzumab in combination with chemotherapy is recommended for advanced gastric cancer positive for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) overexpression. Despite this recommendation, an informal pilot survey suggested that many oncologists do not include HER2 testing as part of routine practice to identify patients most likely to benefit from adding trastuzumab to chemotherapy. Methods: An interactive online educational activity was developed to provide expert guidance on HER2 testing and use of HER2-targeted agents in gastric or GE cancer. Pre- and post-education surveys were administered as part of the activity to measure changes in participant competence. In addition, 3 months after completing the educational activity, participants were sent another follow-up survey by email to assess changes in practice. Results: To date, pre-and post-education surveys have been obtained for 122 oncologists and 3-month follow-up surveys obtained from 14 oncologists. In the pre-education survey, only 46% said they were testing all of their patients with advanced gastric or GE cancer for HER2 overexpression. However, immediately after participating in the educational intervention, this proportion increased to 93%. Importantly, a follow-up survey indicated that HER2 testing of all patients with advanced gastric or GE cancer was now part of routine practice for 79% of those surveyed. A final analysis of pre- and post-education and 3-month follow-up surveys will be presented. Conclusions: Expert guidance on HER2 testing and use of HER2-targeted agents in gastric or GE cancer provided through an interactive online educational intervention substantially improved oncologist competence and practice patterns.

158 Background: There is an unmet medical need for effective treatments for patients with advanced pNET. Systemic therapies for advanced pNET are limited both by toxicity and efficacy. Everolimus, an oral mTOR inhibitor, has shown promising antitumor activity in 2 phase II studies, leading to further investigation in the largest phase III randomized controlled trial completed in pNET patients. Methods: Patients with advanced low- or intermediate-grade pNET were randomly assigned to everolimus 10 mg/d orally + best supportive care (BSC; n = 207) or placebo + BSC (n = 203). Long-acting somatostatin analogs (SSAs) were permitted as BSC during the study. The primary endpoint was progression free survival (PFS). At progression (RECIST), patients could be unblinded and those randomly assigned to placebo were offered open-label everolimus. Results: Compared with placebo, everolimus reduced the risk of progression by 65% and increased median PFS by more than 6 months, from 4.6 to 11.0 months (HR = 0.35; 95% CI: 0.27-0.45; p < 0.0001), by investigator review (primary endpoint). Median PFS by central review was consistent (HR = 0.34; 95% CI: 0.26 to 0.44; p < 0.001] in favor of everolimus. Eighteen-month PFS estimates were 34% for everolimus (95% CI: 26-43) vs 9% (95% CI: 4-16) for placebo. Everolimus demonstrated a significant PFS benefit across all patient subgroups according to baseline characteristics and prior SSA use. Prior SSA use was 49% in the everolimus arm and 50% in the placebo arm. Updated analyses of the impact of concomitant SSA will be reported. The most common drug-related adverse events were stomatitis, rash, diarrhea, fatigue, and infections (primarily upper respiratory); most were grade 1 or 2. Stomatitis (6.9% vs 0%), anemia (6% vs 0%), and hyperglycemia (5% vs 2%) were the most common grade 3-4 events. Conclusions: Everolimus significantly prolonged PFS compared with placebo in patients with advanced pNET in this large phase III clinical trial. This benefit was seen across all patient subgroups. Treatment resulted in a significant 6.4-month prolongation in median PFS. Everolimus had an acceptable and predictable safety profile. [Table: see text]

LBA504 Background: Limited efficacy and serious toxicities have limited uptake of tamoxifen or raloxifene as preventatives of breast cancer. Aromatase inhibitors (AIs) prevent contralateral breast cancers more than tamoxifen in adjuvant trials and have fewer serious side effects. This is the first report of an AI used in primary prevention. Methods: NCIC CTG MAP.3 is a randomized trial designed to detect a 65% reduction in annual incidence of invasive breast cancer (IBC) on exemestane (E) versus placebo (P). Eligible postmenopausal women had ≥ one of the following risk factors: Gail score >1.66%, prior ADH, ALH, LCIS or DCIS with mastectomy, age over 60. Health-related and menopause-specific quality of life (QOL) were assessed by SF-36 and MENQOL questionnaires. Results: From 2004-2010, 4,560 women were randomized: age 62.5 yrs (37-90); Gail Score 2.3 % (0.6-21); BMI 28.0 kg/m2 (15.9-65.4). Risk factors included: age >60 yrs (49%); Gail score >1.66 (40%); and prior ADH, ALH, LCIS or DCIS with mastectomy (11%). At median follow-up of 35 months there were 11 IBCs on E and 32 on P (annual incidence 0.19% vs 0.55%; HR= 0.35, 95% CI 0.18-0.70, p = 0.002); ductal (10E/27P), lobular (1E/5P). Most tumors were ER positive (7E/27P); Her2/neu negative (10E/26P); TNM stage T1 (8E/28P), N0 (7E/22P), M0 (11E/30P). E was superior in all subgroups: by Gail score, age, BMI, prior LCIS and DCIS. The annual incidence rate of IBC or DCIS was 0.35% E and 0.77% P (HR=0.47;95% CI 0.27-0.79; p = 0.004) based on 64 IBCs or DCISs (20E/44P). Clinical bone fractures, osteoporosis, hypercholesterolemia or cardiovascular events were equal in both arms. No clinically meaningful differences in QOL were detected. Conclusions: Exemestane significantly reduced invasive and pre-invasive breast cancers in postmenopausal women at increased risk for breast cancer with no serious toxicities. Exemestane should be considered a new option for primary prevention of breast cancer. Supported by the Canadian Cancer Society; Pfizer Inc. PEG supported in part by Avon Foundation.

Purpose To determine the pathologic complete response (pCR) rate in estrogen receptor (ER) –positive primary breast cancer triaged to chemotherapy when the protein encoded by the MKI67 gene (Ki67) level was > 10% after 2 to 4 weeks of neoadjuvant aromatase inhibitor (AI) therapy. A second objective was to examine risk of relapse using the Ki67-based Preoperative Endocrine Prognostic Index (PEPI). Methods The American College of Surgeons Oncology Group (ACOSOG) Z1031A trial enrolled postmenopausal women with stage II or III ER-positive (Allred score, 6 to 8) breast cancer whose treatment was randomly assigned to neoadjuvant AI therapy with anastrozole, exemestane, or letrozole. For the trial ACOSOG Z1031B, the protocol was amended to include a tumor Ki67 determination after 2 to 4 weeks of AI. If the Ki67 was > 10%, patients were switched to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. A pCR rate of > 20% was the predefined efficacy threshold. In patients who completed neoadjuvant AI, stratified Cox modeling was used to assess whether time to recurrence differed by PEPI = 0 score (T1 or T2, N0, Ki67 < 2.7%, ER Allred > 2) versus PEPI > 0 disease. Results Only two of the 35 patients in ACOSOG Z1031B who were switched to neoadjuvant chemotherapy experienced a pCR (5.7%; 95% CI, 0.7% to 19.1%). After 5.5 years of median follow-up, four (3.7%) of the 109 patients with a PEPI = 0 score relapsed versus 49 (14.4%) of 341 of patients with PEPI > 0 (recurrence hazard ratio [PEPI = 0 v PEPI > 0], 0.27; P = .014; 95% CI, 0.092 to 0.764). Conclusion Chemotherapy efficacy was lower than expected in ER-positive tumors exhibiting AI-resistant proliferation. The optimal therapy for these patients should be further investigated. For patients with PEPI = 0 disease, the relapse risk over 5 years was only 3.6% without chemotherapy, supporting the study of adjuvant endocrine monotherapy in this group. These Ki67 and PEPI triage approaches are being definitively studied in the ALTERNATE trial (Alternate Approaches for Clinical Stage II or III Estrogen Receptor Positive Breast Cancer Neoadjuvant Treatment in Postmenopausal Women: A Phase III Study; clinical trial information: NCT01953588).