Citations

Extracellular RNAs (exRNAs) have been identified in all tested biofluids and have been associated with a variety of extracellular vesicles, ribonucleoprotein complexes and lipoprotein complexes. Much of the interest in exRNAs lies in the fact that they may serve as signalling molecules between cells, their potential to serve as biomarkers for prediction and diagnosis of disease and the possibility that exRNAs or the extracellular particles that carry them might be used for therapeutic purposes. Among the most significant bottlenecks to progress in this field is the lack of robust and standardized methods for collection and processing of biofluids, separation of different types of exRNA‐containing particles and isolation and analysis of exRNAs. The Sample and Assay Standards Working Group of the Extracellular RNA Communication Consortium is a group of laboratories funded by the U.S. National Institutes of Health to develop such methods. In our first joint endeavour, we held a series of conference calls and in‐person meetings to survey the methods used among our members, placed them in the context of the current literature and used our findings to identify areas in which the identification of robust methodologies would promote rapid advancements in the exRNA field.

Abstract Summary: One central theme of modern high-throughput genomic data analysis is to identify relevant genomic features as well as build up a predictive model based on selected features for various tasks such as personalized medicine. Correlating the large number of ‘omics’ features with a certain phenotype is particularly challenging due to small sample size (n) and high dimensionality (p). To address this small n, large p problem, various forms of sparse regression models have been proposed by exploiting the sparsity assumption. Among these, network-constrained sparse regression model is of particular interest due to its ability to utilize the prior graph/network structure in the omics data. Despite its potential usefulness for omics data analysis, no efficient R implementation is publicly available. Here we present an R software package ‘glmgraph’ that implements the graph-constrained regularization for both sparse linear regression and sparse logistic regression. We implement both the L1 penalty and minimax concave penalty for variable selection and Laplacian penalty for coefficient smoothing. Efficient coordinate descent algorithm is used to solve the optimization problem. We demonstrate the use of the package by applying it to a human microbiome dataset, where phylogeny structure among bacterial taxa is available. Availability and implementation: ‘glmgraph’ is implemented in R and C++ Armadillo and publicly available under CRAN. Contact: chen.jun2@mayo.edu or hongzhe@upenn.edu Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Nanoparticles emerged as carriers of promising diagnostic and therapeutic molecules due to their unique size, injectability, and potential to sustainably release molecular cargos.

ABSTRACTNeither breakpoints (BPs) nor epidemiological cutoff values (ECVs) have been established forCandidaspp. with anidulafungin, caspofungin, and micafungin when using the Sensititre YeastOne (SYO) broth dilution colorimetric method. In addition, reference caspofungin MICs have so far proven to be unreliable.Candidaspecies wild-type (WT) MIC distributions (for microorganisms in a species/drug combination with no detectable phenotypic resistance) were established for 6,007Candida albicans, 186C. dubliniensis, 3,188C. glabratacomplex, 119C. guilliermondii, 493C. krusei, 205C. lusitaniae, 3,136C. parapsilosiscomplex, and 1,016C. tropicalisisolates. SYO MIC data gathered from 38 laboratories in Australia, Canada, Europe, Mexico, New Zealand, South Africa, and the United States were pooled to statistically define SYO ECVs. ECVs for anidulafungin, caspofungin, and micafungin encompassing ≥97.5% of the statistically modeled population were, respectively, 0.12, 0.25, and 0.06 μg/ml forC. albicans, 0.12, 0.25, and 0.03 μg/ml forC. glabratacomplex, 4, 2, and 4 μg/ml forC. parapsilosiscomplex, 0.5, 0.25, and 0.06 μg/ml forC. tropicalis, 0.25, 1, and 0.25 μg/ml forC. krusei, 0.25, 1, and 0.12 μg/ml forC. lusitaniae, 4, 2, and 2 μg/ml forC. guilliermondii, and 0.25, 0.25, and 0.12 μg/ml forC. dubliniensis. Species-specific SYO ECVs for anidulafungin, caspofungin, and micafungin correctly classified 72 (88.9%), 74 (91.4%), 76 (93.8%), respectively, of 81Candidaisolates with identifiedfksmutations. SYO ECVs may aid in detecting non-WT isolates with reduced susceptibility to anidulafungin, micafungin, and especially caspofungin, since testing the susceptibilities ofCandidaspp. to caspofungin by reference methodologies is not recommended.

Abstract Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is the fifth leading cause of cancer death among women in the United States (5% of cancer deaths). The standard treatment for patients with advanced EOC is initial debulking surgery followed by carboplatin-paclitaxel combination chemotherapy. Unfortunately, even with modern chemotherapy, most patients relapse and die with the five-year overall survival around 45%. In addition, those patients that initially respond to taxane-platinum therapy eventually develop platinum-resistant tumors and relapse. Thus, finding novel therapeutics for treating EOC is essential. One approach that has been used widely in cancer drug discovery is Connectivity Mapping (CMAP) using gene expression data and drug phenotype data assessed on cancer cell lines (CCL) (i.e. “sensitive” or “resistant” based on dose-response drug data). However, recent publications have highlighted some issues with the use of these standard CCL sets that are often used in these drug screening studies. Therefore, instead of CMAP analysis based on gene expression signatures developed on drug response data collected on a small set of EOC cell lines, we took a novel CMAP approach based on information collected on EOC patients and clinical endpoints. That is, we determined the gene expression signature (e.g., set of genes) that were associated with time to recurrence in data collected on EOC patients within TCGA (n = 518) and a Mayo Clinic study (n = 474). The set of genes associated with time to recurrence (with and without adjustment for additional clinical covariates) was completed separately for TCGA and Mayo Clinic studies, restricting all analyses to EOC tumor of high-grade serous histology. Each of these 4 sets of genes, where genes with hazard ratios (HR) > 1 coded as “positively” associated and genes with HR < 1 coded as “negatively” associated with the phenotype, were inputted into CMAP software (Broad Institute) to determine a set of drugs for which our signature “matches” the “reference” signature. The drugs that overlapped between the CMAP analyses on the two studies were carried forward for validation studies involving drug screens on a set of 10 EOC cell lines. Of the 11 drugs carried forward, we a priori hypothesized that 5 of these drugs would kill EOC cells (mitoxantrone, podophyllotoxin, wortmannin, doxorubicin, and 17-AAG), for which all 5 showed an ability to kill EOC cells in vitro (cell lines were treated using serial dilutions of the drugs (20-0 μM) for 72 h followed by measuring cell viability using the CellTiter-Blue assay). Further research is on-going to understand the functional mechanism by which these candidate drugs might treat EOC and to apply this bioinformatics approach to other cancer drug screening studies. Note: This abstract was not presented at the meeting. Citation Format: Brooke L. Fridley, Rama Raghavan, Gottfried E. Konecny, Chen Wang, Ellen L. Goode, Harsh B. Pathak, Stephen Hyter. A bioinformatics approach to drug discovery: patient based connectivity mapping. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 106th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2015 Apr 18-22; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(15 Suppl):Abstract nr 4853. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2015-4853

Abstract Background: Recent bioinformatic analyses and high-throughput sequencing efforts have revealed that RNA editing is a widespread post-transcriptional modification that affects non-coding repetitive elements throughout the genome. This modification, which involves the conversion of adenosine into inosine, is mediated by the action of the adenosine deaminases acting on RNA (ADAR) family of enzymes. Based on reports of dysfunctional ADAR expression in epithelial ovarian cancers (EOC), we hypothesized that single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in five ADAR genes (ADAD1, ADAR1, ADAR2, ADAR3, SND1) may contribute to EOC susceptibility, potentially by altering the expression of corresponding genes in ovarian tissues. Methods: Using directly genotyped and imputed data from 10,891 invasive EOC cases and 21,693 healthy controls of European ancestry represented in the international Collaborative Oncological Gene-environment Study, we evaluated the frequency of 7,133 SNPs in 5 RNA editing genes. Unconditional logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) between genotypes and case status under a log-additive genetic model, with adjustment for the first five principal components representing European ancestry. Subgroup analysis was conducted for the four main histologic sub-types of EOC. We also aggregated SNP-level data and conducted gene-level analyses using the Admixture Maximum Likelihood (AML) test and the Sequence-Kernel Association test for the combined effect of common and rare variants (SKAT-CR). Results: Association analysis revealed a top risk-associated SNP (OR (95% CI) = 1.39 (1.17-1.64)) in ADAR3 with P = 1.3 x10−4, 17 additional SNPs in ADAR1, ADAR3, or SND1 with P = 10−4, and 51 SNPs with P = 10−3; this observed number of statistically-significant SNPs was greater than expected. When restricting to the 6,500 invasive serous adenocarcinomas, the magnitude of association strengthened for numerous SNPs. Exploratory analysis for the less common histologic subtypes (endometrioid (n = 1,439), mucinous (n = 696), and clear cell (n = 660)) revealed SNP-level associations (P<10−3) unique to each sub-type. Gene-level analyses based on AML and SKAT-CR revealed that ADAR1 was globally associated (P<0.10) with susceptibility to invasive EOC, with P = 0.024 and P = 0.023, respectively. Expression quantitative trait locus analysis is underway to evaluate associations between genotype and gene expression in EOC and precursor tissues using data from The Cancer Genome Atlas Project and other sources. Conclusions: Preliminary data from this large-scale collaboration suggest that germline variation involving RNA editing genes may influence susceptibility to EOC. This novel finding warrants further investigation, as inherited and acquired alterations affecting RNA editing may serve as important biological mechanisms that promote the development of EOC and possibly other malignancies. Citation Format: Jennifer Permuth-Wey, Brett M. Reid, Y. Ann Chen, Hui-Yi Lin, Alvaro Monteiro, Zhihua Chen, Andrew Berchuck, Georgia Chenevix-Trench, Jennifer Doherty, Simon Gayther, Ellen Goode, Edwin Iversen, Leigh Pearce, Paul D. P. Pharoah, Catherine Phelan, Susan Ramus, Mary Anne Rossing, Joellen Schildkraut, Thomas Sellers, on behalf of the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium. Inherited variants affecting RNA editing may contribute to ovarian cancer susceptibility. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 106th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2015 Apr 18-22; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(15 Suppl):Abstract nr 4635. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2015-4635

Abstract Background: Cell-type-specific super enhancers, or large clusters of mediator-rich enhancers, are highly transcribed regions of the genome with key functions in the maintenance of cell identity and control. These regulatory elements are easily perturbed and enriched for disease-associated sequence variation. Identification of disease-associated super-enhancers and investigation of their sequence variants may help identify important, biologically relevant associations previously overlooked by genome-wide studies. Thus, we sought to identify variants within ovarian tissue specific super-enhancers and investigate their association with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) susceptibility. Methods: We utilized genotype data from a European population of ∼11,000 invasive EOC cases and 22,000 healthy controls from the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium. A public catalog of 478 super-enhancers, identified by peak histone H3K27ac ChIP-seq signal in ovarian tissue, was used to identify 72,116 variants located within 344 super-enhancer regions. Unconditional logistic regression (log-additive model) was used to assess individual SNP-EOC risk associations. Additionally, we reviewed associations within 500 kb of super-enhancer regions to identify proximal associated variants. When LD structure indicated, we employed conditional analysis to determine independence of the super-enhancer signal. Gene-EOC risk associations were assessed with the Admixture Maximum Likelihood (AML) test and Sequence-Kernel Association Test (SKAT) for the combined effect of common and rare (MAF<0.01) variants. Models were adjusted for population stratification using the first five principal components. To adjust for multiple comparisons, a false discovery rate of 10% was used. Results: The most significant SNP observed was rs147487657 (p = 7.7×10−6) on locus 2q37.3 in the HDAC4 gene and there were an additional 12 SNPs with p<1.0×10−4, although not significant at 10% FDR. Gene-level analyses identified two super-enhancers significantly associated with EOC risk. An enhancer at the previously reported 2q31 locus, containing HOXD8 and HOXD-AS2, associated (SKAT p = 4.3×10−5; AML p<0.001) with the top SNP located within the 5′UTR of HOXD8 transcription factor (rs847163 (T>C); p<2.08×10−5). Conditional analysis did not identify an independent association within the super-enhancer region. The second EOC-associated super-enhancer identified was at locus 1q32 (SKAT p = 0.00052, AML p = 0.001) containing the CSRP1 gene. There were 6 SNPs with p<0.001 and 16 SNPs with p<0.01, all were inversely associated with risk and consistent with the top hit at rs927901 T>C (OR = 0.94; 95% CI: 0.90-0.97; p = 2.1×10−4). Associations varied by histologic subtype, possibly due to variance in disease relevant super-enhancer cell-type.Conclusion: These findings suggest germline variation within super-enhancer regions may contribute to EOC susceptibility Citation Format: Brett M. Reid, Jennifer Permuth-Wey, Y. Ann Chen, Hui-Yi Lin, Alvaro Monteiro, Zhihua Chen, Andrew Berchuck, Georgia Chenevix-Trench, Jennifer Doherty, Simon Gayther, Ellen L. Goode, Edwin Iversen, Leigh Pearce, Paul Pharoah, Catherine Phelan, Susan Ramus, Mary Anne Rossing, Joellen Schildkraut, Thomas Sellers, on behalf of the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium. Variants within super-enhancer regulatory elements associate with epithelial ovarian cancer risk. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 106th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2015 Apr 18-22; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(15 Suppl):Abstract nr 4634. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2015-4634