Citations

11005 Background: Pazopanib is approved for soft tissue sarcoma pts after failure of other therapy, but there are few subtype-specific data regarding kinase inhibitor activity. We report on a single arm, phase II trial of REGO in advanced EWS. Methods: EWS pts (age > 18, ECOG 0-2, good organ function) who had at least 1 line of therapy and had PD within 6 mo were eligible. Prior oral kinase inhibitors were not allowed. Initial REGO dose was 160 mg PO QD x21 q28d. Dose reductions were employed for toxicity and AEs. The primary endpoint was PFS at 8 weeks (PFS8w) employing RECIST 1.1. Sample size of 30 allowed determination of the difference between PFS8w of 50% vs 25% with alpha = 0.05 and power of 91%. Results: 30 pts (median age 32, range 19-65; M/F = 20/10; ECOG 0/1/2 = 16/13/1; bone, 12; soft tissue, 18; median prior treatments 5, range 1-10) enrolled at 14 US sites (09/2014-03/2016). Most common grade (G3) toxicities were hypophosphatemia (6), hypertension (2), high ALT (2) and 1 each: fatigue, abd pain, diarrhea, hypokalemia, oral mucositis, neutropenia and rash; no G4 toxicities were noted. 13 pts required ≥1 dose reduction, most commonly hypophosphatemia (n = 7); 2 stopped REGO for toxicity. There was 1 death in the 30 day post study period, not REGO related. Median dose at study end: 140 mg (3.5 tabs, range 80-160 mg) 3 wks on/1wk off. 18/30 pts were without PD at 8 wks. Median PFS: 3.6 mo (95%CI 2.8-3.8 mo). PFS8w by KM was 73% (95%CI 57-89%). Best responses: PR/SD/PD/not evaluable of 3/18/7/2, for RECIST RR 10%. Two pts with PR had EWSR1 translocation by FISH; a third had CIC-DUX4. Median duration of response: 5.5 mo (95%CI 2.9-8.0). Median OS is not reached. Conclusions: The substudy met its primary endpoint. REGO toxicity was similar to that seen previously. Enrollment continues in LPS and OGS cohorts, and is being expanded to further study variant EWS without EWSR1-FLI1 fusion. Study of the existing tissue may elucidate which EWS patients may benefit from REGO. Clinical trial information: NCT02048371.

e21704 Background: Patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) have difficult symptom burden (i.e. fatigue, pruritus, night sweats) not resolved by current medical therapies including jak inhibitor therapy. We hypothesize that on-line (at home) yoga might alleviate MPN symptoms and complement medical therapy. Methods: MPN patients, recruited by social media, were asked to complete 60 min/week of online yoga (designed for MPN patients) for 12 weeks and completed online self-report surveys (weeks 0,7,12 and 16) on participation (Qualtrics), disease features, and symptom burden (MPN Symptom Assessment Form; NIH PROMIS measures of pain, anxiety, depression, sleep, and sexual function). Results: Two hundred and forty-four MPN patients completed the eligibility survey, 134 were eligible, 55 completed the informed consent, and 38 MPN patients completed the 12-week intervention. The majority of participants were diagnosed with either PV (n = 16) or ET (n = 16), with MF being less common (n = 6). Approximately 37% (n = 14) of study participants averaged ≥60 min/week of yoga (i.e., demand). Yoga participation averaged 50.8±36.2 min/week. Overall, 68% of participants were satisfied with online yoga and 75% felt that is was helpful for coping with MPN-related symptoms (i.e., acceptability, practicality). Additionally, 75% of participants felt safe from injury while participating in online yoga. Only one adverse event was reported (irritated enlarged spleen). From week 0 to week 12 (n = 38), there were significant improvements in total symptom burden (effect size [ES] in standard deviation units = -0.36, p = 0.004), anxiety (ES = -0.67, p = 0.002), depression (ES = -0.41, p = 0.049), sleep (ES = -0.58, p < 0.001), and fatigue (ES = -0.33, p = 0.04). These improvements remained significant at follow-up week 16 (n = 28) for all outcome measures with a trend for maintained fatigue improvement (ES = -0.34, p = 0.06) (see Table 1). There were no significant differences in outcomes between those that averaged < 60 min/week of yoga compared to those that averaged ≥60 min/week of yoga. Conclusions: A 12-week online yoga intervention is feasible (i.e., accepted, practical) for MPN patients and merits a randomized trial as complementary therapy.

e21684 Background: Pharmacologic therapy stabilizes hematologic counts and splenomegaly in myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN), however only partial symptom improvement typically occurs. Evidenced-based supportive care interventions are needed, however data is limited in patients with MPNs. Methods: Patients were recruited internationally via social media. Informed consent and online self-report surveys (Qualtrics) were completed capturing patient demographics, disease specific data, supportive care utilization, and symptom burden via MPN-SAF TSS. ANOVA, chi square tests, and Wilcoxon rank sum tests methods were applied. Results: Patients:1087 patient surveys were consented. Of these, 858 had 10 or more responses. There were 338 essential thrombocytosis (ET), 188 myelofibrosis (MF), 315 polycythemia vera (PV), and 17 other. In MF: DIPSS risk categories included low (8%), Int-1 (19%), Int-2 (29%), high (12%), and unknown (32%). Supportive care:The most frequently utilized therapies were aerobic activity in 442 patients (51.5%), massage in 244 (28.4%), yoga in 220(25.6%), nutrition in 216 (25.1%), and strength training in 204 (23.7%). Symptom association: Among all respondents, aerobic activity (p=<0.001), massage (p=<0.001), yoga (p=0.02), and strength training (p=<0.001) was associated with lower symptom burden by the MPN-SAF TSS however, nutrition was not (p=0.10). In ET and PV subgroups, yoga intervention was no longer statistically significant (p=0.35, p=0.14). In the MF subgroup, no intervention was found to be significant in any risk category. Conclusions: Supportive care with aerobic activity, massage, yoga, and strength training is associated with improved symptom burden in patients with MPN. Further studies are needed to understand the benefits of such therapies. [Table: see text]

10512 Background: Inotuzumab ozogamicin (InO), a CD22-targeting antibody linked to calicheamicin demonstrated exceptional activity in R/R ALL in adults. InO has been available to pediatric patients with R/R ALL via a compassionate access program. Methods: Participating international pediatric oncology centers received IRB approval to submit retrospective demographic, outcome and toxicity data on pediatric patients who received at least one dose of InO. Results: Thirty-four patients, age 2.3-21.4 yrs (median 11.7) received 1-4 cycles (3 weekly doses) of InO. Patients were heavily pretreated in 1st-5threlapse; 28 were refractory to their preceding regimen. Thirteen patients had prior hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT), 27 received prior CD19 and 8 prior CD22-directed therapy. Pre-InO disease was M3 ( > 25% blasts) in 26 patients, M2 (5-25%) in 3, and MRD only in 5 (1 with extramedullary disease). Of 29 patients with M2/M3 disease at baseline, 18 (62%) achieved a complete remission (CR), 13 of whom were MRD negative. Post-InO, 15 patients proceeded to HSCT and 5 to CAR T-cell therapy. Alterations in CD22 expression at subsequent relapse were noted in two patients with available blasts samples. No deaths were attributed to InO during therapy. The incidence of grade 3/4 infections was 38% and were of the expected types. Grade 1-4 hepatic toxicity was noted in 11/34 (32%) patients, primarily asymptomatic elevations in transaminases/bilirubin. There was no sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS) during InO therapy but 8/15 patients who received HSCT post-InO developed SOS. One patient died from SOS, but the others recovered. The incidence of SOS was higher in patients who had undergone prior HSCT (6/8) versus no prior HSCT (2/7). SIRS (1), neurotoxicity (2) and hemorrhage (3) were infrequent. Three patients had musculoskeletal pain associated with edema. Conclusions: Single agent InO had a CR rate of 62% in heavily pretreated pediatric patients. Toxicities were similar to adults with hepatic and infectious toxicity being the most common. Overall InO was well tolerated, but the incidence of SOS was high in patients who underwent HSCT post-InO, particularly in those who had undergone a prior HSCT.

e21545 Background: A nocebo is an inert substance that causes adverse events. Although previous studies have examined the favorably positive (placebo) effects of an inert substance, few studies have examined negative (nocebo) effects, particularly in older patients who sometimes experience frequent and severe adverse events from cancer therapy. Methods: This study focused on placebo/nocebo-exposed patients who participated in two double-blind, placebo-controlled, cancer therapeutic studies, namely, North Central Cancer Treatment Group (NCCTG) 97-24-51 and American College of Surgeons Oncology Group (ACOSOG) Z9001, with the goal of reporting comparative, age-based adverse event rates. Results: Among the 446 patients who received placebo/nocebo exclusively, 161 were 65 years of age or older at the time of respective trial entry; 5234 adverse events occurred. Unadjusted adverse event rates did not differ significantly between patients 65 years of age or older and those younger: rate ratio (99% confidence intervals (CI): 1.01 (0.47, 2.02) with similar findings for grade 2 or worse adverse events and for all symptom-driven adverse events (for example, pain, loss of appetite, anxiety). Adjustment for sex, ethnicity, baseline performance score, and trial resulted in no significant age-based rate differences in adverse event rates. Similar findings were observed with an age threshold of 70. Conclusions: A nocebo effect appears to occur irrespective of age. This observation suggests that adverse events should be taken no less seriously in older than in younger cancer patients and that education to manage patients’ expectations from cancer therapy might improve tolerability. [Table: see text]

e21057 Background: BRAF, NRAS, CDKN2A and P53 mutations are commonly observed pathogenic mutations in cutaneous melanoma. The influence of mutations such as BRAF, NRAS, CDKN2A and P53 on treatment response in the PD1 inhibitor era has not been well defined. Methods: This study included patients with melanoma with a cutaneous or unknown primary. All patients had genomic profiling with the Mayo Clinic 50-gene solid tumor mutation panel. Treatment response to first line immunotherapy with PD1, CTLA-4, or combination PD1/CTLA-4 inhibitors were assessed by response rate and time-to-progression (TTP) rate at 12 months. Each patient outcome was stratified by non-mutually exclusive gene mutation status into BRAF, NRAS, P53, CDKN2A, or quadruple negative (N4) groups. Results: Genomic profiling was performed on 208 patients, of whom 102 received first line immunotherapy. Most patients received a PD1 inhibitor (n = 62), followed by CTLA-4 inhibitor (n = 34), and combination therapy (n = 6). A trend towards improved outcomes was observed in CDKN2A and BRAF mutated patients with worse outcomes noted in P53, N4, and NRAS patients. The percent without progression at 12 months were BRAF 52.2%, CDKN2A 58.2%, NRAS 30.5%, P53 37.7%, and N4 26.7% (see table below). Response rates were BRAF 46.4%, CDKN2A 38.5%, NRAS 22.2%, P53 40.0%, and N4 33.3%. Conclusions: There is a trend towards improved outcomes with immunotherapy in BRAF and CDKN2A mutated patients while P53, NRAS and N4 patients have inferior outcomes. [Table: see text]