Citations

Abstract We previously have reported that autograft absolute lymphocyte count (A-ALC) is a possible prognostic factor for survival after autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplant (ASCT) for myeloma (MM). Factors affecting A-ALC in MM are unknown. We hypothesize that method of stem cell mobilization, hematopoietic growth factor (HGF) vs. HGF+Cytoxan chemotherapy (C+HGF), directly affects A-ALC collection. 191 consecutive MM patients between 1994 and 2004 were analyzed retrospectively. Patients generally were mobilized with C+HGF prior to 2003. Thereafter, C+HGF was reserved largely for those with ≥4% circulating peripheral blood plasma cells (PC), a negative prognostic indicator. No patients were transplanted in disease relapse or refractory disease. Patients also were matched for age, sex, β2-microglobulin, conventional cytogenetics, LDH, c-reactive protein, number of prior therapies, plasma cell labeling index (PCLI), pre-mobilization ALC, and % bone marrow (BM) PC. The groups HGF (n=80) and C+HGF (n=111) differed with respect to the conditioning regimen (p < 0.0001), and presence of (≥4%) circulating peripheral blood PC (p<0.005). The primary end-point of the study was to assess the correlation between HGF vs C+HGF, and A-ALC. The secondary endpoint was to determine if HGF vs C+HGF affected survival post-ASCT. Patients mobilized with HGF had a higher A-ALC compared to those mobilized with C+HGF [0.764 x 109 lymphocytes/kg (range: 0.146–1.803) vs. 0.212 (range: 0.016–1.26), p<0.0001]. No association was identified between A-ALC and conditioning regimens (p = 0.19) and PC (p = 0.31). Median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were longer in those mobilized with HGF vs. C+HGF (not reached vs. 48 months, p<0.0150; not reached vs. 21 months, p<0.007, respectively). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that age ≥50 vs age ≤50 (p<0.05) and A-ALC ≥0.5 vs <0.5x109 lymphocytes/kg (p<0.0397) were independent predictors of OS. Factors influencing PFS in the multivariate analysis included circulating PC ≥4% vs <4% (p<0.0157), PCLI ≥ 1% vs PCLI ≤ 1% (p<0.0107), and A-ALC ≥0.5 vs <0.5x109 lymphocytes/kg (p<0.0042). On multivariate analysis, the method of stem cell mobilization and the conditioning regimen did not have a statistically significant effect on either OS or PFS. We hypothesize that the differences in PFS and OS seen between the HGF vs C+HGF mobilization groups are mediated through the A-ALC. These data suggest that mobilization regimens should not only collect CD34+ stem cells, but also be optimized to collect an A-ALC target which may impact on PFS and OS post-ASCT.

Abstract Background: The presence of circulating myeloma cells (CMC) detected by flow cytometry at the time of diagnosis of multiple myeloma is associated with a shortened response to therapy and reduced overall survival (OS). We hypothesized that the presence of CMC at the time of stem cell collection prior to high dose therapy (HDT) and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) would identifies a cohort of patients with a high risk of rapid progression. Methods: The Mayo Clinic myeloma transplant database was queried for patients who were mobilized using cyclophosphamide and hematopoietic growth factors. CMC was determined using flow cytometry by gating on a population of CD38 bright and CD45 negative cells. The impact of CMC on OS and time to progression (TTP) and its role in the context of established prognostic parameters was evaluated. Results: Of 246 patients with MM undergoing ASCT, 95 had CMC. Patients with CMC had significantly higher plasma cell labeling index, adverse cytogenetics, B2-M and resistant disease. Complete response (CR) rates post transplant were 32% and 36% for patients with and without CMC (p=0.5034). OS was 33.2 and 58.6 months (p=0.0052) while TTP was 14.1 and 22 months respectively (p=0.0005). Figure Figure On multivariate analysis, CMC remained an independent prognostic factor in a model that included cytogenetics and disease status at time of transplant (p=0.0314). A prognostic system based on the presence or absence of CMC and karyotype abnormalities was developed. Patients with neither, one or both parameters had a median, OS of 55, 48 and 21.5 months respectively (p<0.0001) while TTP was 22, 15.4 and 6.5 months for the same groups (p<0.0001). Conclusion: The presence of CMC at the time of HDT and ASCT is an independent prognostic factor. The combination of CMC and cytogenetics provides a simple yet powerful scoring system that stratifies patients and guides their management.

Abstract Introduction: We previously reported that serum cardiac biomarkers are among the most powerful predictors of overall survival. This observation was based on outcomes of more than 300 patients with primary systemic amyloidosis (AL) receiving either low dose chemotherapy or high dose chemotherapy with peripheral blood stem cell transplant (PBSCT). Not all institutions use the N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NTproBNP) assay, but rather the B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) assay. We therefore determined the relative utility of BNP in patients with AL undergoing PBSCT and up-dated our results using our NTproBNP-troponin T staging system. Methods: Between 4/10/96 and 2/24/05, 164 patients with AL undergoing PBSCT had measurements of serum cardiac biomarkers. All BNP measurements were done on fresh serum (Biosite Inc., San Diego). The NTproBNP (Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN) and troponin T (TnT) (Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN) measurements were done on either stored serum or on fresh samples as previously reported. Follow-up for patients was through March 2005. Results: Between 5/1/03 and 2/15/05, 72 patients had BNP measurements pre-transplant. The median value was 167 pg/ml (range 5 to 7739). Forty-two of these patients also had an NTproBNP measured. There was good agreement between the two tests in the 42 patients that had both measurements (rho 0.823, p<0.0001). To further test the relationship between the two tests, we evaluated the correlation between BNP and NTproBNP using 204 simultaneous measurements from 106 patients (rho=0.89, p<0.0001). Next, we tested the prognostic utility of BNP. Using a cut-off point of 120 pg/L (the upper limit of normal for women over the age of 70 and the 50th percentile of all measurements in our data set), we found that BNP was prognostic for survival post-transplant. It was independent of TnT values, and patients could be divided into 3 risk categories using these two measurements (low risk if both values were low, high-risk if both were high, and intermediate if either was high). This system was highly predictive of overall survival (Figure A). We next compared the BNP-TnT staging system to our previously reported NTproBNP-TnT staging system in the 42 patients that had all 3 values pre-transplant. The correlation between the two staging systems was excellent (rho=0.91, p<0.0001). Follow-up for the 100 patients who had been reported previously is now 26.9 months. As shown in Figure B, the NTproBNP-TnT system predicts for overall survival post transplant. Conclusions: Serum levels of cardiac biomarkers are invaluable prognostic markers in patients with AL. Preliminary data would suggest that a BNP-TnT system is as useful as the NTproBNP-TnT system. Risk thresholds: BNP <120 pg/ml; TnT <0.035 ng/ml; NT-proBNP < 332 pg/ml BNP-TnT statisfaction: low risk, both low; high risk, both high; intermediate, either high. NT-proBNP-TnT satisfaction: low risk, both low; high risk, both high; intermediate, either high. Risk thresholds: BNP <120 pg/ml; TnT <0.035 ng/ml; NT-proBNP < 332 pg/ml BNP-TnT statisfaction: low risk, both low; high risk, both high; intermediate, either high. NT-proBNP-TnT satisfaction: low risk, both low; high risk, both high; intermediate, either high.

Abstract INTRODUCTION: Obesity is increasingly common in the US and is frequently associated with co-morbid medical conditions that may increase the risk of HCT, often the optimal treatment for AML. HCT risk and outcomes for AML on the basis of body mass index (BMI) have not been well-characterized. Using data from the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR), we have previously shown no significant difference in outcomes for autologous HCT for lymphoma among normal weight, overweight, and obese patients (pts) but worse outcomes for underweight pts (Navarro et al, BBMT 2006, 12(5): 541–51). Here, we compare outcomes by weight groups for AML patients who underwent autologous, related, or unrelated HCT. METHODS: Our final population included patients age ≥ 18 who underwent myeloablative unpurged autologous or allogeneic HCT for AML in 1st or 2nd complete remission, primary induction failure, or 1st relapse reported to the CIBMTR from 1995 to 2004. Cord blood HCTs were excluded. Four weight groups were defined based on BMI (BMI=weight (kg)/ height (m2)): underweight <18; normal=18–25; overweight >25–30; and obese >30. Treatment-related mortality (TRM), relapse, leukemia-free survival (LFS), and overall survival (OS) were compared using multivariable proportional hazards regression analysis accounting for patient, disease and HCT-related variables. RESULTS: We included 373 autologous, 2041 related, and 1801 unrelated transplant recipients. Patient-, disease-, and transplant characteristics were well-matched across weight groups and transplant types. Multivariable analysis examining risks (95% confidence intervals) relative to the normal weight group are: HCT Type Normal Underweight Overweight Obese -- =not done due to insufficient number of pts; NS=not significant; treatment failure = death or recurrence of disease. Autologous n=164 n=5 n=112 n=81 Death -- NS NS Treatment failure -- NS NS Relapse -- NS NS TRM -- NS NS Related Allogeneic n=1161 n=31 n=543 n=268 Death 1.86 (1.24–2.78) NS 1.23 (1.04–1.47) Treatment failure 2.08 (1.37–3.15) NS 1.19 (1.00–1.42) Relapse 2.02 (1.18–3.47) NS NS TRM 2.22 (1.17–4.22) NS 1.32 (1.02–1.70) Unrelated Allogeneic n=846 n=31 n=523 n=368 Death NS NS NS Treatment failure NS NS NS Relapse NS 0.82 (0.68–0.99) 0.76 (0.60–0.96) TRM NS NS NS CONCLUSIONS: There were no significant differences in risk of TRM, LFS, relapse or OS for normal weight, overweight or obese patient groups who received autologous HCT. Obese recipients of related HCT for AML had increased risk of death, treatment failure, and TRM, though the magnitude was small, an effect was not seen in the unrelated HCT group. Underweight patients who received a related, but not unrelated HCT, fared substantially worse than normal weight patients for all outcomes. It may be that the higher risk of the unrelated HCT procedure masks important but less obvious risks associated with being underweight whereas in the related donor HCT setting, such risks become manifest. Small numbers of patients limit the ability to better characterize this finding in underweight patients. Disproportionately, fewer transplants have been reported in underweight patients which suggest they experience disease and patient-related factors that preclude transplantation. No differences were observed for incidence of acute or chronic GVHD for any weight group. Overweight and obesity should not be a barrier to HCT; however, caution should be exercised in selecting underweight patients for HCT.

Abstract Introduction: The Bone Marrow Transplant Program at Mayo Clinic (Rochester, Minnesota) developed a multidisciplinary approach (involving physicians, nurses, pharmacists, dietitians, and financial specialists) for outpatient management of patients undergoing stem cell transplantation. This approach uses an electronic ordering system for diagnostic tests and chemotherapy to minimize medical errors. Table. Patient Characteristics (N=716) Characteristic Value Male, no. of patients (%) 426 (59) Age, median (IQR), y 59 (53–65) Creatinine, median (IQR), mg/dL 1.0 (0.9–1.2) b2-Microglobulin, median (IQR), mcg/mL 2.5 (1.9–3.7) Gammopathies, no. of patients (%) Measured by serum immunofixation or immunoelectrophoresis IgA 148 (21) IgG 414 (58) IgM 6 (1) IgD 12 (2) Light chain 83 (12) Biclonal 6 (1) None 47 (7) Measured by urine immunofixation or immunoelectrophoresis k light chain 402 (56) l light chain 226 (32) Biclonal 1 (0) None 79 (11) Not performed (anuric) 8 (1) Status at stem cell transplant, no. of patients (%) Untreated 4 (1) Plateau 436 (61) Primary refractory 113 (16) Relapse after therapy 93 (13) Relapse during therapy 70 (10) Characteristic Value CD34+ cells, median (IQR), ×106/kg Collected, no. 10.0 (7.6–12.6) Infused, no. 4.7 (3.9–6.2) Sessions of apheresis, median (IQR) 3 (2–5) Engraftment, median (IQR), days after transplantation Neutrophils, 0.5×109/L 13 (12–15) Platelets, 50×109/L 16 (14–22) Duration of hospitalization, median (IQR), d 4 (0–10) Abbreviation: IQR, interquartile range. Results: During a 45-month period after implementation of the program (2005-Sept 2007), the day-100 survival rate was 99.5% for low-risk myeloma patients (transplantation during first plateau; n=202) and 97% for high-risk myeloma patients (refractory, relapsing or second or greater plateau; n=71). The overall day-100 survival rate was 99%(270/273). Analysis of hospitalization trends since inception of the program showed that 39% of patients completed the transplant procedure as outpatients. The median duration of hospitalization for all patients was 4 days; age and serum creatinine levels were predictive of the need for and duration of hospitalization Conclusion: Outpatient stem cell transplantation is feasible for patients with multiple myeloma with a therapy mortality of 1%. Nearly 40% of our patients completed the procedure without hospitalization. Age and serum creatinine levels predicted a higher likelihood of hospitalization. Implementation of out patient transplant requires affordable housing in the community since many third party payers do not support hotel costs despite the reduction of hospital days. The hospital physical plant and patient registration process has to support use of designated hospital rooms for purely out patient practice. The transplant team must have process owners to standardize across all disease categories collection protocols, conditioning regimens, infusion SOP’s and post infusion supportive care guidelines for standard antibiotics, narcotics, laboratory work and transfusion thresholds. A care team meeting between physicians, nursing, dietary, pharmacy, business office, data base and appointment coordinators is essential to coordinate all the multidisciplinary efforts. Kaplan-Meier curve shows the percentage of patients remaining in the hospital through time t, stratified on the basis of age greater than or less than or equal to 65 years Kaplan-Meier curve shows the percentage of patients remaining in the hospital through time t, stratified on the basis of age greater than or less than or equal to 65 years Kaplan-Meier curve shows the percentage of patients remaining in the hospital through time t, stratified on the basis of creatinine greater than or equal to or less than 1.5mg/dL Kaplan-Meier curve shows the percentage of patients remaining in the hospital through time t, stratified on the basis of creatinine greater than or equal to or less than 1.5mg/dL

Abstract On intergroup phase III trial, MRC UKALLXII/ECOG2993, 25% of 613 ECOG patients were positive for Ph or its molecular equivalent, BCR/ABL; all were B-lineage ALLs (B-ALL). When compared to Ph(−) B-ALL, Ph(+) ALL had more blasts expressing CD25 (α-chain of interleukin-2 [IL-2] receptor) (p=3E-31), CD34 (p=4E-10), CD13 (p=3.9E-16) and CD33 (p=3.5E-09), and blasts with higher density of CD10 (p=9.6E-12). There was no difference in antigen expression profiles between pts with e1a2 (N=107) and b2a2/b3a2 (N=48) BCR/ABL transcripts. Complete remission (CR) rate was lower (p= 7.4E-6) and overall survival (OS) was shorter in Ph(+) compared with Ph(−) B-ALL (p=6.5E-5). There was no difference in outcome between e1a2 and b2a2/b3a2 pts (p=0.65). CD25 was the most powerful prognostic indicator in Ph(+) cases, both for CR (p=0.004) and OS (p=1.3E-05). Strikingly, CD25 negatively affected OS in a continuous fashion; 1% increase in CD25 was related to a 1% increase in the hazard of death. On the other hand, CD25 expression was not associated with OS in Ph(−) pts (p=0.66). Among 152 Ph(+) pts, 30 lacked CD25 expression, 24 with e1a2 and 6 with b2a2/b3a2 transcripts. When analyzed separately, CD25(−)Ph(+) pts had outcome indistinguishable from that of Ph(−) pts (p=0.89). Compared to CD25(+)Ph(+) pts, CD25(−) Ph(+) pts had lower WBC counts at presentation (p=4.1E-05). Both CD25(+) and CD25(−) Ph(+) blasts expressed the γ-chain but not the β-chain of the IL-2 receptor, arguing against the presence of a functional IL-2 receptor. There was no association between CD25 expression or outcome and the presence of additional cytogenetic abnormalities seen in 52% of Ph(+) pts. To further examine the prognostic impact of CD25, BCR/ABL levels were quantitated by real-time PCR in 136 Ph(+) pts at presentation. There was no correlation between presenting BCR/ABL levels and blast count (p=0.98), achievement of CR (p=0.73), or OS (p=0.67). However, higher blast counts at diagnosis were associated with shorter survival (p=0.003). BCR/ABL levels were measured in 43 pts 1 month after induction therapy. Changes in BCR/ABL after therapy were classified as undetectable, >90% reduction, >50% reduction, or no change. While CR status did not correlate with BCR/ABL reduction (p=0.97), the chance of survival ranked in the order of undetectable (p=0.01), >90% reduction (p=0.05), >50% reduction (p=0.37), or no change (p=0.87). CD25 expression at presentation correlated with that order (p=0.002). CD25(−)Ph(+) pts fell into the group with undetectable BCR/ABL levels after treatment, whereas pts with highest initial CD25 expression fell into the group with no change. In conclusion, CD25(−)Ph(+) blasts are more sensitive to non-TKI therapy than CD25(+) Ph(+) blasts. Outcome in Ph(+) ALL is thus determined by CD25 expression rather than the presence of Ph per se. RESPONSE CD25(+)Ph(+) CD25(−)Ph(+) Ph(−) B-Lin ALL n 122 30 308 % CR Rate 57% 71% 81% MedianOS (months) 12.2 30.2 27.7

Abstract Over the past decade several prospective studies of post-remission therapy in AML have compared allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), autologous HSCT and chemotherapy. The data are appropriately presented by intention-to-treat analyses. However, such analyses do not provide information to the clinician or patient as to outcome from the initiation of post-remission therapy, be it HSCT or chemotherapy. Furthermore, such analyses are impossible to interpret when a significant percentage of patients do not receive their intended therapies (for example, only 54% of patients randomized to autologous HSCT; Cassileth, NEJM, 1998). Finally, such studies present survival data that may not be relevant to current practice where the mortality from autologous HSCT has decreased sharply (for example, 14% non-relapse mortality from autologous HSCT; Cassileth, NEJM, 1998). In the current analysis, results from 4 consecutive ECOG studies that included autologous HSCT were analyzed and the data collated. In PC486 patients received standard induction followed by allogeneic HSCT if they had a compatible sibling; otherwise they were to undergo an autologous HSCT without any prior consolidation (Cassileth, JCO, 1993). E4995 studied standard induction with added high-dose cytarabine (HiDAC) intensification on D 8–10, followed by 2 courses of HiDAC consolidation. All patients were to undergo an autologous HSCT after induction and consolidation (Cassileth, Leuk Lymph, 2005). E3489 was a US Intergroup study in which patients received standard induction (3 + 7). If in CR, all patients received an attenuated course of induction (2 + 5). Patients who had a histocompatible sibling were assigned to allogeneic HSCT; those without a donor were randomized to an autologous HSCT or chemotherapy (Cassileth, NEJM, 1998). E1900 is an ongoing phase III study in which patients receive standard induction followed by allogeneic HSCT or two courses of HiDAC followed by autologous HSCT. The latter study is ongoing; therefore, only data describing transplant-related mortality (TRM) are presented. The relapse rate from start of each post-remission regimen in these studies, based on therapy actually received and not on intention-to-treat analysis, is presented in table 1 and the TRM is presented in table 2. Table 1. Relapse Rate from Start of Post-Remission Therapy Cytogenetics Allogeneic HSCT (n=85) Autologous HSCT (n=113) Chemotherapy (n=109) Favorable 11.8% (2/17) 10.5% (2/19) 60% (12/20) Intermediate 20.5% (8/39) 32.3% (10/31) 53.7% (22/41) Unfavorable 16.7% (2/12) 41.7% (5/12) 83.3% (15/18) Unknown 23.5% (4/17) 33.3% (17/51) 56.7% (17/30) Table 2. Treatment-Related Mortality after Post-Remission Therapy Allogeneic HSCT Autologous HSCT – Marrow Autologous HSCT – Blood Chemotherapy Study E3489, E4995, E1900 E3489, PC 486 E4995, E1900 E3489 Treatment-related mortality 15.3% (18/117) 11% (16/85) 1.5% (2/135) 2.7% (3/109) In conclusion: The TRM after autologous HSCT using mobilized peripheral blood has decreased substantially in recent years. As shown in table 2, in PC486 and E3489 where bone marrow was harvested and treated with perfosfamide (4-HC) prior to cryo-preservation, the TRM was significantly greater than in the later studies, E4995 and E1900, where peripheral blood was harvested after priming with chemotherapy and/or cytokines. The lower relapse rate post autologous transplant, together with the lower procedural mortality with current practice, may confer a survival advantage in future prospective studies of autologous HSCT versus chemotherapy. While absolute comparisons cannot be made, as the timing of each therapy may not be identical, these data provide crucial information for informed and patient/physician discussions prior to initiation of postremission therapy.

Abstract Background: Myelofibrosis (MF) shortens survival but also compromises quality of life from disease associated splenomegaly and constitutional symptoms (fatigue, weight loss, night sweats, and bone pain). No current validated instrument of patient reported outcomes (PRO) captures the spectrum of MF associated symptoms. In an era of rapid development and testing of therapeutic agents which may impact the natural history and symptoms associated with MF (such as JAK2 inhibitors) a uniform and validated instrument for capturing the presence, severity (and potentially improvement) of MF symptoms is needed. We sought to develop and validate such an instrument, the myelofibrosis symptom assessment form (MFSAF). Methods: Based upon the results in our MF QOL survey (Cancer2007;109(1):68–76), we developed the MFSAF to assess fatigue (via the brief fatigue inventory (BFI-Cancer1999;85:1186)), additional symptoms were independently assessed for presence and severity on a scale from 0 (absent) to 10 (worst possible) for splenomegaly associated symptoms (early satiety, pain, inactivity, cough) night sweats, itching, bone pain, fever, unintentional weight loss as well as an estimate of overall quality of life. Additionally, patients provided feedback on the quality and nature of the MFSAF, and also completed for comparison validated instruments including the Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale (MSAS), the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI), and the Brief Pain Index. Physician input was included including their assessment of patient’s fatigue, spleen symptoms, and quality of life (blinded to patient’s responses) as well as clinical history, lab and exam findings. Results: MFSAF Results 34 MPD patients were enrolled (24 MF, 10 in the comparison group (4 polycythemia vera (PV), 6 essential thrombocythemia (ET)). the MFSAF was rated by patients as easy to understand (median score 1, range 0–6), and “addressed most of my symptoms” (median score 1, range 0–6) both on a scale of 0 (as good as possible to 10 as bad as possible). When asked if a symptom was not addressed (open ended response) no single symptom was named more than once. As we have previously reported fatigue was common with BFI scores (median 3.6 (0–10) for MF and 2.5 (range 0.2–3.8) for the ET/PV group (increasing BFI score associated with worsening fatigue) worse than median score of published “healthy” controls 2.2. Additional MF associated symptoms were captured well by the MFSAF with splenic, constitutional symptoms, and QOL (median 3 (range 0–7) MF, median 2 (0–3) ET/PV) documented easily and worse than ET/PV controls. Physicians estimation of QOL was excellent (median 3 (0–8) for MF, median 2 (0–4) for ET/PV). MFSAF Comparison to other Instruments: The MSAS demonstrated more adverse values for MF (than ET/PV) in the PSYCH (psychologic stress; mean-1.27 (STD DEV 0.80), PHYS (physical symptoms; mean 0.90 (STD DEV 0.53)), GDI (Global Distress Index mean-1.29 (STD DEV 0.77)) and a total MSAS symptom score (mean 0.85 (std dev (0.49)) comparable with advanced renal disease (PSYCH 0.99, PHYS 0.99, GDI 1.27, and MSAS of 0.81; J of Pall Med2007;10(6):1266), as well as advanced lung disease, AIDS, and various advanced malignancies. Individual, previously validated MSAS questions were all highly correlated (all p<0.01) with MFSAF (in italic) counterparts including lack of energy (fatigue), cough (same), pain (both abdominal pain and bone pain), sweats (night sweats), itching (same), and weight loss (same). Further validation of pain measurements in the MFSAF came from comparison to the BPI where both individually the presence, and intensity of pain (both abdominal and bone) were highly correlated (all p<0.01). Insomnia, not yet included in the MFSAF, was present in 68% and 63% of patients (MSAS and ISI, respectively). Additionally, problems with sexual interest, or activity, was noted in 35% of patients to the MSAS. Conclusions: Currently available instruments of PRO and symptoms are lengthy, and individually incomplete for assessing the presence and severity of the diverse nature of symptoms associated with MF. The proposed MFSAF, was comprehensive and well understood by patients and the results for the individual symptoms assessed were highly correlated with previously validated instruments for other conditions as well as with physicians perceptions of fatigue and QOL. The MFSAF, with the addition of questions regarding insomnia and sexuality, should be utilized in all trials of therapeutic agents in MF patients in which symptomatic improvements are an endpoint.

Abstract Introduction: Immunotherapy is most likely to work in a setting of low tumor burden, making vaccine strategies attractive as maintenance therapy post autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT) for multiple myeloma (MM). However, it is difficult to ascertain the effects of the vaccines from delayed responses to the transplant. A novel immunotherapeutic, APC8020 (Mylovenge), was studied as consolidation therapy after for MM post PBSCT (Mayo vaccine trial). Mylovenge is prepared from autologous antigen presenting cells, including dendritic cells, partially purified from an unmobilized leukapheresis product by gradient density isolation and then incubated for two days with autologous serum containing M protein obtained pretransplant. We report long term results of the Mayo vaccine trial compared retrospectively to a consecutive cohort of MM patients who underwent autologous stem cell transplant at Mayo Clinic during the same time period. Methods: The Mayo vaccine trial patients had transplants between July of 1998 and May of 2001. Using these cutoff dates we analyzed 151 total MM patients, 27 from the vaccine trial (9 newly diagnosed and 18 relapsed) and 124 from database (DB) (50 newly diagnosed patients and 74 relapsed). The median (range) of follow-up for alive patients in vaccine trial is 6.5 years (2.9 – 8), and in the DB is 7.1 years (6 – 8). Two-sided Fisher’s exact tests and stratified log rank tests (with newly diagnosed or relapsed as the stratum) were used to compare baseline patient characteristics and time to event distributions (overall survival – OS, progression free survival – PFS, and time to progression – TTP) between the two groups. Results: The median (range) of age in vaccine trial and DB was 56 (30–69) and 57 (36–71) years respectively. There were no significant differences in the known prognostic factors including PCLI, B2M, and CRP. The median (95% confidence interval - CI) TTP for the vaccine trial and DB patients was 1.5 years (1.3 – 2.4) and 1.6 years (1.3 – 1.8); stratified log rank p value = 0.46. The median (95% CI) PFS for the vaccine trial and DB patients was 1.5 years (1.3 – 2.4) and 1.5 years (1.1 – 1.8), stratified logrank p value = 0.30. The median (95% CI) OS for the vaccine trial and DB patients was 5.3 years (4.0 -N/A), and 3.4 years (2.7 – 4.6); stratified logrank p value = 0.02. Conclusions: Despite the fact that no difference was seen in TTP or PFS, post-transplant vaccine therapy was associated with prolonged survival. This is similar to what has been reported in other tumor systems including prostate cancer and glioblastoma multiforme. This approach warrants further investigation, including preclinical studies aimed at optimizing the immune response and randomized trials to define the role of vaccine therapy in myeloma. Figure Figure

Abstract Introduction: We retrospectively analyzed outcomes of 716 patients with multiple myeloma who were mobilized using cyclophosphamide and growth factor (n=370) or growth factor alone (n=346) before stem cell transplantation. Table. Patient Characteristics (N=716) Variable Cyclophosphamide (n=370) Growth Factor Only (n=346) P Value Abbreviation: IQR, interquartile range. *Or equivalent dosage. Men, No. of patients (%) 224 (61) 202 (58) .50 Age, median (IQR), y 58 (52–64) 60 (53–65) .11 b-2 Microglobulin, median (IQR), mcg/mL 2.7 (1.9–4.0) 2.3 (1.9–3.2) .01 Creatinine, median (IQR), mg/dL 1.1 (0.9–1.3) 1.0 (0.8–1.2) .002 Apheresis, median (IQR) collections, No. 2 (1–3) 4 (3–6) .001 Marrow plasma cells, % 17 (5–34) 5 (1–13) .001 CD34+cells, median (IQR), cells/kg Total collected 10.3x106(7.2x106–14.6x106) 9.9x106(7.6x106–11.9x106) .01 Infused 5.6x106(4.5x106–7.6x106) 4.2x106(3.8x106–5.0x106) <.001 Duration of hospitalization, median (IQR), d 4 (0–10) 4 (0–9) .92 Nonstaphylococcal bacteremia, No. of patients (%) 48 (13) 25 (7) .01 Melphalan dosage, No. of patients (%) .04 200 mg/m2* 337 (91) 298 (86) 140 mg/m2* 33 (9) 48 (14) Exposure before mobilization, No. of patients (%) Melphalan 45 (12) 44 (13) .50 Lenalidomide 14(4) 63(18) .01 Results: Patients receiving cyclophosphamide had higher stem cell yields than the growth factor only group (median number of apheresis sessions needed to achieve stem cell collection goals, 2 vs 4 sessions, respectively [P=.001]). However, patients treated with cyclophosphamide required more time for engraftment of platelets and neutrophils (P<.001 for both). For patients receiving cyclophosphamide, 75% achieved engraftment (defined as a platelet count of 50x109/L) by day 39, whereas 75% of patients not receiving cyclophosphamide achieved engraftment by day 18. Similar results were observed for neutrophil engraftment. These differences did not affect the duration of hospitalization, but patients treated with cyclophosphamide had a higher incidence of posttransplant nonstaphylococcal bacteremia. For cyclophosphamide-mobilized patients, considerably faster platelet engraftment (5 fewer days) resulted if stem cell reinfusion occurred more than 30 days after the first apheresis session. Conclusion: Our data suggested that cyclophosphamide damaged the microenvironment and slowed engraftment. By lengthening the period between the completion of apheresis and stem cell reinfusion, the microenvironment may recover and result in faster engraftment. We suggest that the cyclophosphamide used for mobilization may affect the marrow microenvironment. Cyclophosphamide improves yields but increases bacteremia rates after transplantation. Cyclophosphamide increases time required to collect stem cells and slows engraftment. Figure Figure