Citations

Abstract Background: Intrinsic resistance has been linked to ER down-regulation and poor clinical outcome in breast tumors. Aurora-A kinase (AURKA) promotes distant metastases through activation of epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT) programming and expansion of breast tumor initiating cells (BTICs) harboring a CD44high/CD24low phenotype. Moreover, AURKA induces down-regulation of ERα expression and resistance to endocrine therapy that is mediated by SMAD5 transcription factor (D’Assoro et al., Oncogene 2014: 33:599-610). The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of AURKA in endocrine resistance induced by breast cancer stemness and ER down-regulation. Materials and Methods: We employed parental MCF-7 and variant MCF-7 cells ex-vivo (vMCF- 7/LCC9, vMCF-7/FR) that have high endogenous levels of AURKA, are ERlow, and exhibit in vivo resistance to fulvestrant. Real-Time Cell Proliferation and Apoptosis assays were performed to assess response to endocrine and/or AURKA-targeted therapy using the innovative IncuCyte ZOOM System. Stemness activity was assessed by culturing breast cancer cells under non-adherent conditions to generate mammospheres. Expression of ER, CD44 and CD24 markers was characterized by FACS analysis and immunofluorescence. Results: Pharmacologic inhibition of AURKA activity with the small molecule, alisertib, significantly restored sensitivity to fulvestrant in vMCF-7/LCC9 and vMCF-7/FR cells. To establish whether fulvestrant resistance was linked to enrichment of BTICs, breast cancer cells were cultured under non-adherent conditions to generate mammospheres. vMCF-7/FR cells generated mammospheres at higher efficiency compared to parental cells suggesting that vMCF-7/FR cells exhibited high self-renewal activity. vMCF-7/FR-derived mammospheres displayed a stem cell-like CD44high/CD24low phenotype that was further characterized by low levels of ER expression and resistance to fulvestrant. When vMCF-7 FR-derived mammospheres were treated with alisertib alone or combined with fulvestrant, the combination was more effective in mediating restoration of endocrine sensitivity. The phenotype of the alisertib-treated mammospheres was functionally linked to loss of CD44 expression, restoration of CD24 and ER expression, and sensitivity to fulvestrant. Conclusions: These findings provide further evidence that AURKA activity plays a central role in breast cancer progression through the genesis and clonal expansion of BTICs that are characterized by ER down-regulation and resistance to endocrine therapy. These results are important for the treatment of endocrine resistant breast tumors because they provide the rationale for the development of an innovative therapeutic approach to combine endocrine therapy with a targeted inhibitor of AURKA activity. Citation Format: Antonino B. D’Assoro, Tufia Haddad, Matthew Goetz, Mary Kuffel, John Hawse, Vera Suman, Jeffrey Salisbury, James Ingle, Evanthia Galanis. Pharmacologic targeting of Aurora-A kinase restores ERα expression and endocrine sensitivity through impairment of breast cancer stemness. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 107th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2016 Apr 16-20; New Orleans, LA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(14 Suppl):Abstract nr 3313.

Abstract INTRODUCTION: The tumor microenvironment consists of a complicated interplay between a heterogeneous mixture of tumor cells and the surrounding tissue and there is a burgeoning interest in the role of the tissue microbiota within this microenvironment. Our group has investigated the breast tumor microbiome using the unaligned (non-human) reads from 796 RNASequencing data obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) repository of Breast Cancer. METHODS: Unmapped sequences for 720 TCGA tumor samples and 76 paired normal samples were analyzed with Kraken v0.10.5 using the RefSeq 16S and standard genomes. To minimize false discoveries Kraken results were filtered to species that have bacterial genomic and 16S read support. Cluster analysis of the T-distributed Stochastic Neighbor Embedding (tsne) was performed and consensus voting of 26 maximum scoring metrics identified 3 distinct clusters. Differential abundance analysis was performed with the edgeR package. Covariate association analysis was performed for tumor clinical characteristics, as well as sample heterogeneity characteristics. RESULTS: There were three microbiome clusters we identified using TCGA breast samples. The average silhouette width of the third cluster was deemed statistically insignificant (0.071), suggesting further stratification of this cluster is necessary. The remaining two TCGA clusters (467) shared an average silhouette width of 0.39, using Bray's dissimilarity index. Differential abundance analysis of the two clusters after Bonferroni correction identified 450 significant species. The biomes were represented by 63 triple negative, 93 HER2+, 258 Luminal, and 50 tumor adjacent normals. Concordant cluster assignment was observed in 93.7 +/- 7.3% of the normal-tumor pairings, averaged across clinical subtypes. We observed clear delineation of biome populations at the order taxonomic level, which was not associated with the clinical subtype or the tumor/tumor adjacent pairings. We found enrichment of Burkholderiales in the first biome and enrichment of Bacillales and Lactobacillales within the second biome. The second biome appears to be deplete of representatives from the Asian population (p value 0.005) and survival associations were observed to be significantly reduced for HER2 patients associated with Biome 1 (p value 0.025). Geneset enrichment analysis of the expression signatures indicated drug metabolism and chemical carcinogenesis pathways to be associated with biome 2. CONCLUSIONS: In our study, we observed two significantly different microbiomes among TCGA breast cancer samples that were not associated with the clinical subtypes. Current efforts include validating these biomes, using 16S sequencing on matching fresh frozen paraffin embedded samples. Additionally, we are evaluating the influence of the biomes in independent adjuvant and neo-adjuvant studies with next generation sequencing data. Citation Format: Kevin J. Thompson, Jason Sinnwell, Xiaojia Tang, James N. Ingle, Matthew P. Goetz, Krishna R. Kalari. Distinct microbiome populations within breast cancer microenvironments. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 107th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2016 Apr 16-20; New Orleans, LA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(14 Suppl):Abstract nr 3298.

Abstract Background ER+ BC is associated with activated CDK4/6. The CDK4/6 inhibitor palbociclib (P) markedly improves time to progression in advanced ER+HER2- BC. We conducted a neoadjuvant phase II trial to determine the activity of P in primary breast cancer as a prelude to adjuvant studies. Methods To assess molecular changes induced by anastrozole (A) or P+A, patients (pts) were treated initially with A alone (1mg PO daily) for 28 days in cycle 0 (C0) before the addition of P (125mg PO daily on D1-21 each cycle) on C1D1. P+A was administered for 4 28-day cycles followed by C5 with A alone for 2-4 weeks (wks) before surgery. P was added in C5 for 10-12 days immediately prior to surgery in the last 20 pts enrolled to assess molecular changes induced by A, either alone or in combination with P immediately prior to surgery, in resected tumor. Goserelin was added in premenopausal pts. Research tumor biopsies were obtained at baseline, C1D1, and C1D15. Central Ki67 analysis was performed at all timepoints, those with Ki67 >10% at C1D15 went off study treatment. The primary endpoint was complete cell cycle arrest (CCA), defined as Ki67 <2.7%, at C1D15. Patient stratification was based on PIK3CA mutation status with an initial focus on PIK3CA wild type (WT) disease. Pts with PIK3CA mutant (Mut) tumors enrolled to a separate cohort. A sample size of 33 pts in the PIK3CA WT cohort was chosen based on the Fleming's single-stage phase II design to test the hypothesis that P+A leads to > 50% improvement over A in CCA rate on C1D15 biopsy (44% with A alone based on historical data, vs 66% with P+A, power = 0.8, alpha=0.05). The primary endpoint is met if >20 pts achieved CCA in this cohort. Correlative endpoints included assessment of markers of proliferation, apoptosis, senescence, Rb, gene expression microarray, intrinsic subtype, and next generation sequencing of 83-gene panels, which will be reported at the meeting. Results Between 4/23/2013 and 4/24/2015, 50 pts (33 PIK3CA WT, 11 PIK3CA Mut, 2 pending, 4 tissue quantity or quality not sufficient for sequencing (QNS)) were enrolled to the study. Median age was 57.5 (range: 34.1–79.6) years. Four pts, all with WT PIK3CA, went off study due to Ki67 >10% on C1D15 biopsy, 26 pts completed treatment and surgery, 1 refused surgery, 3 withdrew study treatment in C1, and 16 continued to receive study drug (2 in C0, 3 in C1, 4 in C2, 5 in C3, 1 in C4, and 1 in C5). Among the 40 pts currently evaluable for the primary endpoint (C1D15 Ki67), CCA occurred in 34 (85%) pts, including 9 of 9 (100%) PIK3CA Mut, 22 of 28 (78.5%) WT, and 3 of 3 QNS pts. Preliminary analysis of available data indicated a significantly lower Ki67 value after 2 wks of P+A (C1D15) compared to that on A alone (C1D1) (p=0.034, n=18). Conclusion This study met the primary endpoint demonstrating that P+A is a highly effective anti-proliferative combination. The sequential biopsy design clearly demonstrated that P+A increased cell cycle control over A alone. P+A was effective regardless of PIK3CA mutation status and these results support the evaluation of this combination in the adjuvant setting for ER+HER2- BC. Citation Format: Ma CX, Gao F, Northfelt D, Goetz M, Forero A, Naughton M, Ademuyiwa F, Suresh R, Anderson KS, Margenthaler J, Aft R, Hobday T, Moynihan T, Gillanders W, Cyr A, Eberlein TJ, Hieken T, Krontiras H, Hoog J, Han J, Guo Z, Vij K, Mardis E, Al-Kateb H, Sanati S, Ellis MJ. A phase II trial of neoadjuvant palbociclib, a cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6 inhibitor, in combination with anastrozole for clinical stage 2 or 3 estrogen receptor positive HER2 negative (ER+HER2-) breast cancer (BC). [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr S6-05.

Abstract Background: AI's are more effective than TAM in ER+ breast cancer. In AI refractory MBC, the response rate to TAM is 0% (Osborne 2011). Z-Endx is an active metabolite of TAM and among TAM treated women in the adjuvant and metastatic settings, reduced CYP2D6 metabolism and low Endx concentrations (Css <20 nM) have been associated with increased likelihood of disease recurrence. Preclinical studies have demonstrated greater Z-Endx exposure and anti-tumor activity with oral Z-Endx compared to equivalent doses of oral TAM (Reid 2014) Methods: We conducted a phase I trial to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) and evaluate the toxicities, clinical activity, and pharmacokinetics (PK) of Z-Endx in patients (pts) with ER+, AI refractory MBC. Unlimited prior endocrine regimens were allowed. An accelerated titration schedule was applied (2 pts/dose level) until moderate toxicity or DLT, followed by a 3+3 design and then to expansion cohorts (40, 80, and 100 mg/day). Z-Endx was administered orally once daily (28 day cycle). Eye exams were performed at baseline, and end of cycles 2 and 6. PK was performed during cycle 1 and prior to subsequent cycles. For pts in the expansion cohorts, tumor biopsies were obtained at baseline for DNA sequencing (Foundation Medicine). Plasma cholesterol levels were obtained at baseline and after 1 cycle. Results: From March 2011 to Dec 2014, 41 pts (38 evaluable), median age 60, received Z-Endx once daily encompassing 7 dose levels (20-160 mg/daily). The median number of prior hormonal regimens was 2 and 3 for the dose escalation and expansion cohorts, respectively. Dose escalation was stopped at 160 mg/day given MTD not reached and attainment of mean Endx Css of 3.6 uM. Cycle 1 DLT (PE) was observed in one patient (60 mg). No eye toxicity was observed. PK demonstrated mean Endx Css of > 1 uM at all dose levels ≥ 40 mg/day. Antitumor activity was observed at multiple dose levels including 3 confirmed partial responses and an additional 7 with stable disease for ≥6 cycles. Of these 10 pts, 9 had prior progression on both AI and fulvestrant and 3 additionally on TAM. After 1 cycle, total and LDL cholesterol decreased > 20 points in 54% and 40% of pts, respectively. Tumor sequencing in the expansion cohorts (n=14) did not identify ESR1 mutations; however, ESR1 amplification was identified in 1 pt with prolonged stable disease (>200 days). Of 6 pts with rapid progression (≤2 cycles), 4/6 had either CCND1 amplification (n=1) or at least one of the following activating mutations: ERBB2 L755S (n=1), AKT1 E17K (n=1), MTOR E1799K (n=1). Conclusions: The direct administration of Z-END provides substantial drug exposure, acceptable toxicity, and "proof of principle" antitumor activity in endocrine resistant MBC. While the MTD was not determined, the goal of achieving Endx Css concentrations of > 1 uM was achieved. Tumor sequencing identified pts with predicted and confirmed endocrine resistance. A randomized phase II comparing endoxifen (80 mg/day) with TAM in AI refractory MBC was recently activated (NCT02311933). Supported in part by CA 133049, CA186686, CA15083, CA116201, and CA15083. Citation Format: Goetz MP, Suman VJ, Reid JM, Northfelt DW, Mahr MA, Dockter T, Kuffel M, Buhrow SA, Safgren SL, McGovern RM, Collins JM, Streicher H, Hawse JR, Haddad TC, Erlichman C, Ames MM, Ingle JN. Final results of a first-in-human phase I study of the tamoxifen (TAM) metabolite, Z-Endoxifen hydrochloride (Z-Endx) in women with aromatase inhibitor (AI) refractory metastatic breast cancer (MBC) (NCT01327781). [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD2-03.

Abstract Background: During tumor progression, activation of Aurora A kinase (AURKA) is associated with epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT) reprogramming and expansion of a subpopulation of tumor initiating cells harboring a CD44+/CD24low/- phenotype [D'Assoro, Oncogene 2014]. These cells are characterized by their capacity to self-renew, resist drug therapies, and promote distant metastases. In ER+ breast cancer (BC) models, activation of AURKA is associated with down-regulation of ERα expression and resistance to endocrine therapy. Alisertib, a selective inhibitor of AURKA, can reverse EMT and restore tumor ERα expression and sensitivity to endocrine therapy [Opyrchal, PLoS One 2014]. As a single agent in HR+ advanced BC, alisertib was associated with a 6-month clinical benefit rate of 54% and median PFS of 7.9 months [Melichar, Lancet Oncol 2015]. The objectives of this phase I trial were to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) and evaluate the toxicities and clinical activity of alisertib with fulvestrant in patients (pts) with HR+ advanced BC. Methods: In this standard 3+3 dose-escalation phase I study, pts were assigned to two different oral doses of alisertib (40-50 mg BID on days 1-3, 8-10, 15-17 q 28-day cycle) in combination with standard dose fulvestrant (500 mg IM on day 1 and 15 of cycle 1 and then day 1 q 28-day cycle thereafter). Eligibility included HR+ advanced BC, postmenopausal status, measurable disease or nonmeasurable bone disease by RECIST v1.1, ECOG performance status ≤ 1, unlimited prior endocrine therapies, and ≤ 2 chemotherapy regimens in the metastatic setting. Results: Ten pts enrolled September 2014 - April 2015, and 9 were evaluable for the primary endpoint (one excluded due to ineligibility). The median pt age was 59 (range 48, 73). Prior endocrine therapies included AI (9, 100%), fulvestrant (6, 67%), and everolimus/exemestane (5, 56%). Eight pts (89%) had prior chemotherapy. A median of 4 cycles of therapy have been administered (range 1+, 9+). There were no severe (grade 3+) toxicities reported during cycle 1 at either dose level, thus the MTD was not reached. The cycle 1 grade 1/2 adverse events regardless of attribution were fatigue (6, 67%), neutropenia (5, 56%), anemia (5, 56%), leukopenia (4, 44%), diarrhea (3, 33%), nausea (3, 33%), and mucositis (1, 11%). As of June 3, 2015, 2 pts have discontinued treatment due to disease progression, and 7 remain on treatment with stable disease (Table). One pt with bone only disease had a near CR on PET scan. Dose LevelAlisertib Dose (BID)Treatment Cycles≥ Grade 3 Toxicity, All CyclesProgression-Free Survival (days)1 (n=3)40 mg4, 7+, 9+ 117, 170+, 223+2 (n=6)50 mg1+, 2, 3+, 3+, 4+, 5+grade 4 neutropenia (1 pt)28+, 56, 56+, 57+, 112+, 116++ indicates patients still receiving treatment Conclusion: Alisertib in combination with fulvestrant was well-tolerated. The recommended phase II dose is 50 mg twice daily on days 1-3, 8-10, and 15-17 q 28-day cycle with standard dose fulvestrant. Promising antitumor activity was observed. Correlative tissue evaluation of AURKA expression and other EMT biomarkers is underway. Funding: This work was funded by Takeda Oncology and supported by NIH Grant K12 CA90628 [TCH]. Citation Format: Haddad TC, D'Assoro AB, Suman VJ, Opyrchal M, Goetz MP, Ingle JN. A phase I trial to evaluate the safety of the addition of alisertib to fulvestrant in hormone receptor positive (HR+), advanced breast cancer. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-13-04.

Abstract Background Activating mutations in PIK3CA occur in approximately 40% ER+BC. MK-2206 (M), a pan-AKT inhibitor, induced apoptosis of ER+ BC under estrogen deprivation in preclinical studies. We conducted this neoadjuvant trial to determine the pathologic complete response (pCR) rate of M plus anastrozole (A) for PIK3CA mutant (Mut) ER+ BC. Methods This single arm open label study of M+A used a 2-stage Simon phase II design (stage 1, n=16; stage 2, n=13, alpha=0.10, power=0.90) to test whether pCR rate <1% (based on historical data with A alone), against the alternative that pCR rate ≥15% in PIK3CA Mut ER+ BC. At least 1 pCR in stage 1 was required to proceed to stage 2. Eligible patients (pts) with clinical stage II or III ER+HER2- BC were pre-registered and proceeded to a research tumor biopsy for PIK3CA sequencing, followed by treatment with daily A monotherapy for 28 days (cycle 0). Pts with PIK3CA Mut BC were subsequently registered, underwent a second biopsy, and started M (150mg PO weekly) with daily A on cycle 1 day 1 (C1D1) for a maximum of four 28-day cycles followed by surgery. Goserelin was added for premenopausal pts. A tumor biopsy on C1D17, 17 days post the start of M, was performed. Those with C1D17 Ki67 >10% discontinued study treatment. pCR was defined as no invasive cancer in the breast and the lymph nodes. Tumor specimens collected at all timepoints are being analyzed for markers of proliferation, apoptosis, and PI3K pathway activity, gene expression microarray, intrinsic subtypes, and next generation sequencing of 83 genes. Results Of the 51 pts pre-registered, 35 pts did not register due to no PIK3CA mutation (n=22), inadequate specimen for testing (n=6), physician/pt decision (n=7). The remaining 16 pts (median age: 58, range: 40-77 years) received combination therapy. Three pts did not complete 4 cycles due to C1D17 Ki67 >10% (n=2) and intolerability (grade (Gr) 4 transaminase elevation in C1, n=1). Other severe toxicities possibly related to M included Gr 3 rash (25%) and pruritus (12.5%). Of the 13 pts completed study therapy and underwent surgery, all had residual disease in the breast and 7 also had positive nodes. Table 1 summarized changes in Ki67 during treatment. ComparisonsnAbsolute changes in Ki67 median (range)Wilcoxon signed rank p-valueC1D1 relative to pre-registration11-17.0% (-49.8 to 4.1%)0.0020C1D17 relative to pre-registration14-16.4% (-51.4 to 4.1%)0.0004C1D17 relative to C1D112-1.5% (-18.6 to 15.8%)0.9697C1D1, biopsy post 28 days of A alone; C1D17 biopsy post 17 days on combination therapy Although Ki67 levels post A monotherapy (C1D1) or M+A (C1D17) were significantly lower than that of pre-registration samples, Ki67 did not differ between C1D17 and C1D1 samples. Other correlative studies are ongoing and results will be presented. Conclusion Despite the small sample size, biomarker analysis on serial biopsy specimens demonstrated that M+A is unlikely to be more effective than A alone in PIK3CA Mut ER+ BC. This trial demonstrated the feasibility of genomic sequencing for pt selection and the value of a small, well-designed proof-of-principle neoadjuvant trial for the evaluation of targeted agents. Citation Format: Ma CX, Suman VJ, Goetz M, Northfelt D, Burkard M, Ademuyiwa F, Naughton M, Margenthaler J, Aft R, Gray R, Tavaarwerk A, Wilke L, Haddad T, Moynihan T, Loprinzi C, Hieken T, Hoog J, Guo Z, Han J, Vij K, Mardis E, Sanati S, Al-Kateb H, Doyle L, Erlichman C, Ellis MJ. A phase II neoadjuvant trial of MK-2206, an AKT inhibitor, in combination with anastrozole for clinical stage 2 or 3 PIK3CA mutant estrogen receptor positive HER2 negative (ER+HER2-) breast cancer (BC). [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-13-04.

Abstract Background: Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) accounts for approximately 20% of all breast cancer diagnoses. Clinical management of TNBC is limited to surgery, chemotherapy and radiation due to lack of estrogen receptor alpha and HER2 expression. Recently, we have shown that approximately 40% of TNBCs express estrogen receptor beta (ERβ) and have begun to explore the possibility that this receptor could be utilized as a novel therapeutic target for this disease. Methods: To examine the biological functions of ERβ in TNBC, novel ERβ expressing TN cell lines (MDA-MB-231 and Hs578T) were developed. In vitro experiments were employed to determine alterations in the global gene expression profiles, biological pathways, proliferation rates, and cell cycle progression following estrogen or ERβ-specific agonist treatment. Cell line xenografts were also established in athymic ovariectomized nude mice to examine tumoral responses to ERβ targeting agents and to investigate gene and protein expression patterns as well as potential serum biomarkers indicative of therapeutic response. Additionally, using the resources of the Mayo Clinic Breast Cancer Genome Guided Therapy Study (BEAUTY), we have identified, and begun to analyze, ERβ+ and ERβ- patient derived xenografts (PDX) established from women with TNBC. Results: Our studies have revealed that both estrogen and multiple ERβ-specific agonists elicit significant anti-proliferative effects in ERβ+ TNBC cells primarily through a G1/S phase cell cycle arrest. These anti-proliferative effects appear to be mediated by cystatins, a family of small secreted cysteine protease inhibitors which are highly induced following estrogen and ERβ-specific agonist treatment. Conditioned media isolated from estrogen or ERβ-specific agonist treated cells decreased the proliferation rates of multiple non-ERβ expressing cell lines; effects that were completely reversed when cystatins were depleted from the media. In addition, we have shown that activation of ERβ, and the subsequent induction of cystatin gene expression, leads to suppression of canonical TGFβ signaling through multiple mechanisms including suppression of TGFβR2 expression, induction of Smad7 expression and blockade of TGFβ ligand-mediated activation of this pathway both in vitro and in vivo. Finally, ERβ+ TNBC PDXs exhibit significantly decreased tumor growth rates in estrogen-treated mice compared to ERβ- TN breast tumors. Conclusions: Our in vitro and in vivo data show that estrogen and ERβ-specific agonists elicit anti-cancer effects in ERβ+ TNBC. These effects appear to be mediated, in part, by cystatins through their inhibitory effects on canonical TGFB signaling, a pathway known to drive TNBC progression. Importantly, these data lay the foundation for studies aimed at examining the ability to therapeutically target ERβ in TNBC patients. Citation Format: Reese J, Bruinsma E, Subramaniam M, Suman V, Pitel K, Kalari K, Yu J, Wang L, Goetz M, Ingle J, Hawse J. ERβ elicits tumor suppressive effects in triple negative breast cancer through the induction of cystatins and suppression of TGFβ signaling. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-04-01.

Abstract Background: Abemaciclib, a small molecule inhibitor of CDK4 and CDK6, induces G1 cell cycle arrest in Rb-proficient human cancers.1 The clinical safety profile of abemaciclib enables continuous oral dosing to achieve sustained target inhibition, resulting in single-agent antitumor activity against multiple human cancers. The drug also reaches relevant concentrations in the central nervous system and, in patients taking the drug orally, can be detected in the cerebrospinal fluid.2 For women with previously treated hormone receptor positive (HR+) metastatic breast cancer (MBC), abemaciclib as a single agent achieved a six-month clinical benefit rate of 61.1% and an objective response rate of 33.3%.3 Clinical trials investigating abemaciclib combined with fulvestrant4 or aromatase inhibitors5 have led to randomized Phase 3 studies for women with HR+ breast cancer.6,7 Methods: This Phase 1b study (NCT02057133) with multiple cohorts evaluates safety and tolerability of abemaciclib combined with endocrine or HER2-targeted therapies for MBC. Secondary objectives include pharmacokinetics (PK) and antitumor activity of abemaciclib when given in combination with other therapies. Cohorts were opened to enrollment sequentially. Patients with HR+ HER2 negative MBC received abemaciclib orally every 12 hours (Q12H) in combination with the following standard therapies daily until progression: letrozole (Part A), anastrozole (Part B), tamoxifen (Part C), exemestane (Part D), or exemestane plus everolimus (Part E). Patients with HER2 positive MBC received abemaciclib orally Q12H in combination with trastuzumab every 21 days until progression (Part F). Adverse events (AEs) were graded by NCI CTCAE v4.0 and tumor response was assessed radiographically using RECIST v1.1. Results: Abemaciclib has been combined with multiple targeted therapies for the treatment of women with MBC. We previously reported safety and early efficacy results for the combinations of abemaciclib with letrozole, anastrozole, tamoxifen, exemestane, and exemestane plus everolimus.5 Due to limited follow-up at that time, the efficacy results were not mature. Safety, PK, and efficacy results with approximately 6 months of additional follow-up will be reported across all parts of the study. The most common treatment-emergent AEs include effects on the gastrointestinal and hematopoietic systems. Consistent with previously reported results for both single-agent abemaciclib and the combination of abemaciclib with fulvestrant, tumor responses have been observed among women receiving abemaciclib in combination with targeted therapies for MBC. Conclusions: This study for women with MBC demonstrates the potential for abemaciclib to be combined with therapies targeting specific signaling pathways. References: 1Gelbert et al. Invest New Drugs. 2014;32(5):825-37. 2Shapiro et al. J Clin Oncol 31, 2013 (suppl; abstr 2500). 3Tolaney et al. SABCS 2014: Abstract 763. 4Patnaik et al. J Clin Oncol 32:5s, 2014 (suppl; abstr 534). 5Tolaney et al. J Clin Oncol 33, 2015 (suppl; abstr 522). 6Llombart et al. SABCS 2014: OT1-1-07 (MONARCH 2, NCT02107703). 7Goetz et al. J Clin Oncol 33, 2015 (suppl; abstr TPS624) (MONARCH 3, NCT02246621). Citation Format: Goetz MP, Beeram M, Beck T, Conlin AK, Dees EC, Dickler MN, Helsten TL, Conkling PR, Edenfield WJ, Richards DA, Turner PK, Cai N, Chan EM, Pant S, Becerra CH, Kalinsky K, Puhalla SL, Rexer BN, Burris HA, Tolaney SM. Abemaciclib, an inhibitor of CDK4 and CDK6, combined with endocrine and HER2-targeted therapies for women with metastatic breast cancer. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-13-25.