Citations

Clear

439 citation(s) found for "Mesa, Ruben".

Outcomes in patients with myelofibrosis and RBC-transfusion dependence in the phase III PERSIST-1 study of pacritinib vs. best available therapy.
Harrison, Claire , Egyed, Miklós , Szőke, Anita , Suvorov, Aleksandr , Perkins, Andrew C. , Mayer, Jiřı́ , Schouten, Harry C. , Tosi, Patrizia , Zhou, Huafeng, Nangalia, Jyoti , Ganly, Peter S. , Farber, Charles Michael , Zachée, Pierre , Scheid, Christof , Dean, James P. , Kiladjian, Jean‐Jacques , Vannucchi, Alessandro M. , Mead, Adam J. , Mesa, Ruben A. , Perkins, Andrew C

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Clinical Oncology | September 6, 2018 | Volume: 34 | Issue: 15_suppl | Pages: 7066-7066

10.1200/jco.2016.34.15_suppl.7066 Get It

Creation and validation of the “myMPN” prospective patient registry of myeloproliferative neoplasm patients.
Scherber, Robyn M. , Whyte, Lindsey, Woehrle, Michelle, Harrison, Claire , Dueck, Amylou C. , Verstovšek, Srđan , Mesa, Ruben A.

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Clinical Oncology | September 5, 2018 | Volume: 36 | Issue: 15_suppl | Pages: e19031-e19031

10.1200/jco.2018.36.15_suppl.e19031 Get It

Quality of life and symptom burden among myeloproliferative neoplasm patients: do symptoms impact quality of life?
Langlais, Blake, Geyer, Holly L. , Scherber, Robyn M. , Dueck, Amylou C. , Langlais, Blake T., Geyer, Holly, Dueck, A. C. , Mesa, Ruben A.

Mayo Clinic

Leukemia & Lymphoma | July 23, 2018 | Volume: 60 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 402-408

10.1080/10428194.2018.1480768 | PMID 30033837 Get It

Graft-versus-host disease in recipients of male unrelated donor compared with parous female sibling donor transplants
Kumar, Anita J. , Hemmer, Michael, Arora, Mukta , Pidala, Joseph A. , Couriel, Daniel R. , Aljurf, Mahmoud , Cahn, Jean‐Yves, Cairo, Mitchell S. , Farhan, Shatha , Hale, Gregory A., Hashmi, Shahrukh K. , Inamoto, Yoshihiro , Kamble, Rammurti T., Kharfan‐Dabaja, Mohamed A. , MacMillan, Margaret L. , Marks, David I. , Norkin, Maxim , Ringdén, Olle , Schouten, Harry C. , Solh, Melhem , Urbano-Ispizúa, Álvaro , Verdonck, Leo F. , Hamilton, Betty K. , Majhail, Navneet S. , Loren, Alison W. , Ringden, Olov , Majhail, Navneet S , Kim, Soyoung , Spellman, Stephen R. , Alousi, Amin Majid , Cahn, Jean‐Yves , Cutler, Corey S. , Gergis, Usama , Nakasone, Hideki , Qayed, Muna , Schultz, Kirk R. , Teshima, Takanori , Gale, Robert Peter

Mayo Clinic

Blood Advances | May 8, 2018 | Volume: 2 | Issue: 9 | Pages: 1022-1031

10.1182/bloodadvances.2017013052 | PMID 29739773 Get It

Key Points Compared with parous female sibling donors, male URDs confer more aGVHD in all patients and more cGVHD in females. There was no difference in survival, relapse, or transplant mortality between recipients of parous female sibling or male URD grafts.
Alternative Outpatient Chemotherapy Scheduling Method to Improve Patient Service Quality and Nurse Satisfaction
Huang, Yu-Li, Bryce, Alan H. , Culbertson, Tracy, Connor, Sarah L., Looker, Sherry, Altman, Kristin M., Collins, James , Stellner, Winston, Moreno‐Aspitia, Alvaro , Looker, Sherry A, Collins, James G, McWilliams, Robert R. , Bryce, Alan H , Culbertson, Tracy L, Ailawadhi, Sikander , Mesa, Ruben A.

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Oncology Practice | December 22, 2017 | Volume: 14 | Issue: 2 | Pages: e82-e91

10.1200/jop.2017.025510 | PMID 29272201 Get It

Introduction: Optimal scheduling and calendar management in an outpatient chemotherapy unit is a complex process that is driven by a need to focus on safety while accommodating a high degree of variability. Primary constraints are infusion times, staffing resources, chair availability, and unit hours. Methods: We undertook a process to analyze our existing management models across multiple practice settings in our health care system, then developed a model to optimize safety and efficiency. The model was tested in one of the community chemotherapy units. We assessed staffing violations as measured by nurse-to-patient ratios throughout the workday and at key points during treatment. Staffing violations were tracked before and after the implementation of the new model. Results: The new model reduced staffing violations by nearly 50% and required fewer chairs to treat the same number of patients for the selected clinic day. Actual implementation results indicated that the new model leveled the distribution of patients across the workday with an 18% reduction in maximum chair utilization and a 27% reduction in staffing violations. Subsequently, a positive impact on peak pharmacy workload reduced delays by as much as 35 minutes. Nursing staff satisfaction with the new model was positive. Conclusion: We conclude that the proposed optimization approach with regard to nursing resource assignment and workload balance throughout a day effectively improves patient service quality and staff satisfaction.
SIMPLIFY-1: A Phase III Randomized Trial of Momelotinib Versus Ruxolitinib in Janus Kinase Inhibitor–Naïve Patients With Myelofibrosis
Kiladjian, Jean‐Jacques , Catalano, John, Devos, Timothy , Egyed, Miklós , Hellmann, Andrzei, McLornan, Donal P. , Winton, Elliott F., Dubowy, Ronald L., Maltzman, Julia D., Cervantes, Francisco , Catalano, John V, McLornan, Donal, Shimoda, Kazuya , Gotlib, Jason , Kiladjian, Jean-Jacques , McLornan, Donal , Mesa, Ruben A. , Deng, Wei

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Clinical Oncology | September 20, 2017 | Volume: 35 | Issue: 34 | Pages: 3844-3850

10.1200/jco.2017.73.4418 | PMID 28930494 Get It

Purpose We evaluated the efficacy and safety of momelotinib, a potent and selective Janus kinase 1 and 2 inhibitor (JAKi), compared with ruxolitinib, in JAKi-naïve patients with myelofibrosis. Patients and Methods Patients (N = 432) with high risk or intermediate-2 risk or symptomatic intermediate-1 risk myelofibrosis were randomly assigned to receive 24 weeks of treatment with momelotinib 200 mg once daily or ruxolitinib 20 mg twice a day (or per label), after which all patients could receive open-label momelotinib. The primary end point was a ≥ 35% reduction in spleen volume at 24 weeks of therapy. Secondary end points were rates of symptom response and effects on RBC transfusion requirements. Results A ≥ 35% reduction in spleen volume at week 24 was achieved by a similar proportion of patients in both treatment arms: 26.5% of the momelotinib group and 29% of the ruxolitinib group (noninferior; P = .011). A ≥ 50% reduction in the total symptom score was observed in 28.4% and 42.2% of patients who received momelotinib and ruxolitinib, respectively, indicating that noninferiority was not met ( P = .98). Transfusion rate, transfusion independence, and transfusion dependence were improved with momelotinib (all with nominal P ≤ .019). The most common grade ≥ 3 hematologic abnormalities in either group were thrombocytopenia and anemia. Grade ≥ 3 infections occurred in 7% of patients who received momelotinib and 3% of patients who received ruxolitinib. Treatment-emergent peripheral neuropathy occurred in 10% of patients who received momelotinib (all grade ≤ 2) and 5% of patients who received ruxolitinib (all grade ≤ 3). Conclusion In JAKi-naïve patients with myelofibrosis, 24 weeks of momelotinib treatment was noninferior to ruxolitinib for spleen response but not for symptom response. Momelotinib treatment was associated with a reduced transfusion requirement.
Ruxolitinib vs best available therapy for ET intolerant or resistant to hydroxycarbamide
Harrison, Claire , Mead, Adam J. , Panchal, Anesh, Fox, Sonia, Yap, Christina , Gbandi, Emmanouela, Houlton, Aimee E., Alimam, Samah , Ewing, Joanne, Wood, Marion , Chen, Frederick , Coppell, Jason, Panoskaltsis, Nicki , Knapper, Steven , Ali, Sahra, Hamblin, Angela , Scherber, Robyn M. , Dueck, Amylou C. , Jackson, Aimee , Scherber, Robyn, Mesa, Ruben, Dueck, A. C. , Mead, Adam J , Cross, Nicholas C.P. , Mesa, Ruben A. , McMullin, Mary Frances , Knapper, Steven , Yap, Christina

Mayo Clinic

Blood | August 9, 2017 | Volume: 130 | Issue: 17 | Pages: 1889-1897

10.1182/blood-2017-05-785790 | PMID 29074595 Get It

Key Points After hydroxycarbamide therapy in high-risk ET, ruxolitinib showed no improvement for complete or partial response rates compared with BAT. Ruxolitinib significantly improved some disease-related symptoms, but rates of thrombosis, hemorrhage, or transformation were not different.