Citations

Clear

453 citation(s) found for "Call, J".

Association of polygenic risk score with the risk of chronic lymphocytic leukemia and monoclonal B-cell lymphocytosis
Kleinstern, Geffen , Camp, Nicola J. , Goldin, Lynn R. , Vachon, Celine M. , Vajdic, Claire M. , Sanjosé, Sílvia de, Weinberg, J. Brice , Benavente, Yolanda , Casabonne, Delphine, Liebow, Mark , Nieters, Alexandra, Hjalgrim, Henrik , Melbye, Mads , Glimelius, Bengt , Adami, Hans‐Olov , Brennan, Paul , McKay, James , Cocco, Pier Luigi, Call, Timothy G. , Hanson, Curtis A. , Robinson, Dennis P. , Chaffee, Kari G. , Brooks‐Wilson, Angela , Monnereau, Alain, Clavel, Jacqueline , Glenn, Martha, Curtin, Karen , Conde, Lucía , Bracci, Paige M. , Morton, Lindsay M. , Severson, Richard K., Chanock, Stephen J., Spinelli, John J., Johnston, James B. , Rothman, Nathaniel , Skibola, Christine F., Leis, José F., Smedby, Karin E. , Berndt, Sonja I. , Caporaso, Neil E., Rabe, Kari G. , Cocco, Pierluigi , Monnereau, Alain , Norman, Aaron D. , Hanson, Curtis, Robinson, Dennis, Cocco, Pierluigi , Brooks-Wilson, Angela R , Vajdic, Claire M , Morton, Lindsay M , Clavel, Jacqueline , Vachon, Celine M. , Casabonne, Delphine , Boffetta, Paolo , Maynadié, Marc , Shanafelt, Tait D. , Cozen, Wendy , Rothman, Nathaniel , Kay, Neil E. , Cerhan, James R. , Slager, Susan L.

Mayo Clinic

Blood | April 19, 2018 | Volume: 131 | Issue: 23 | Pages: 2541-2551

10.1182/blood-2017-11-814608 | PMID 29674426 Get It

Key Points PRS, based on the known CLL loci, predicts CLL risk with high discrimination. This PRS predicts risk of monoclonal B-cell lymphocytosis, a precursor to CLL and a condition that has clinical impact beyond risk for CLL.
“Ultimately, mom has the call”: Viewing clinical trial decision making among patients with ovarian cancer through the lens of relational autonomy
Asiedu, Gladys B. , Ridgeway, Jennifer L. , Carroll, Katherine , Jatoi, Aminah , Breitkopf, Carmen Radecki , Radecki Breitkopf, Carmen , Ridgeway, Jennifer L , Asiedu, Gladys B

Mayo Clinic

Health Expectations | April 14, 2018 | Volume: 21 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 981-989

10.1111/hex.12691 | PMID 29655265 Get It

AbstractObjectiveThis study employs the concept of relational autonomy to understand how relational encounters with family members (FMs) and care providers may shape decisions around ovarian cancer patients’ clinical trial (CT) participation. The study also offers unique insights into howFMs view patients’ decision making.MethodsIn‐depth interviews were conducted with 33 patients with ovarian cancer who had been offered aCTand 39FMs. Data were inductively analysed using a thematic approach and deductively informed by constructs derived from the theory of relational autonomy (RA).ResultsPatients’ relationships, experiences and social status were significant resources that shaped their decisions. Patients did not give equal weight to all relationships and created boundaries around whom to include in decision making. Doctors’ recommendations and perceived enthusiasm were described as influential inCTdecisions. Both patients with ovarian cancer and theirFMs maintained that patients have the “final say,” indicating an individualistic autonomy. However, maintaining the “final say” in the decision‐making process is constitutive of patients’ relationships, emphasizing a relational approach to autonomy.FMs support patients’ autonomy and they do so particularly when they believe the patient is capable of making the right choices.ConclusionsAlthough ethical principles underlying informed consent forCTparticipation emphasize individual autonomy, greater attention to relational autonomy is warranted for a more comprehensive understanding ofCTdecision making.
Racial disparities in bipolar disorder treatment and research: a call to action
Akinhanmi, Margaret, Strakowski, Stephen M. , Berry, Joyce E Balls, Merikangas, Kathleen R. , McInnis, Melvin G. , Leboyer, Marion , Tamminga, C.A., Frye, Mark A. , Akinhanmi, Margaret O, Balls Berry, Joyce E, Merikangas, Kathleen , Biernacka, Joanna M. , McElroy, Susan L. , Assari, Shervin , Schulze, Thomas , Patten, Christi A. , Leboyer, Marion , McInnis, Melvin G

Mayo Clinic

Bipolar Disorders | March 12, 2018 | Volume: 20 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 506-514

10.1111/bdi.12638 | PMID 29527766 Get It

Objectives Health disparities between individuals of African and European ancestry are well documented. The disparities in bipolar disorder may be driven by racial bias superimposed on established factors contributing to misdiagnosis, including: evolving empirically based diagnostic criteria (International Classification of Diseases [ ICD ], Research Diagnostic Criteria [ RDC ] and Diagnostic and Statistical Manual [ DSM ]), multiple symptom domains (i.e. mania, depression and psychosis), and multimodal medical and additional psychiatric comorbidity. Methods For this paper, we reviewed the phenomenological differences between bipolar individuals of African and European ancestry in the context of diagnostic criteria and clinical factors that may contribute to a potential racial bias. Results Published data show that bipolar persons of African ancestry, compared with bipolar persons of non‐African ancestry, are more often misdiagnosed with a disease other than bipolar disorder (i.e. schizophrenia). Additionally, studies show that there are disparities in recruiting patients of African ancestry to participate in important genomic studies. This gap in biological research in this underrepresented minority may represent a missed opportunity to address potential racial differences in the risk and course of bipolar illness. Conclusion A concerted effort by the research community to increase inclusion of diverse persons in studies of bipolar disorder through community engagement may facilitate fully addressing these diagnostic and treatment disparities in bipolar individuals of African ancestry.
Cumulative experience and long term follow-up of pentostatin-based chemoimmunotherapy trials for patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia
LaPlant, Betsy, Pettinger, Adam, Call, Timothy G. , Leis, José F., Conte, Michael, Bowen, Deborah A., LaPlant, Betsy R, Pettinger, Adam M., Conte, Michael J, Kay, Neil E. , Ding, Wei , Parikh, Sameer A. , Shanafelt, Tait D.

Mayo Clinic

Expert Review of Hematology | February 20, 2018 | Volume: 11 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 337-349

10.1080/17474086.2018.1442716 | PMID 29460654 Get It

US Internal Medicine Program Director Perceptions of Alignment of Graduate Medical Education and Institutional Resources for Engaging Residents in Quality and Safety
Chacko, Karen M., Halvorsen, Andrew J. , Swenson, Sara, Wahi‐Gururaj, Sandhya , Steinmann, Alwin F., Call, Stephanie, Myers, Jennifer S. , Vidyarthi, Arpana R., Arora, Vineet M.

Mayo Clinic

American Journal of Medical Quality | November 1, 2017 | Volume: 33 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 405-412

10.1177/1062860617739119 | PMID 29090611 Get It

Alignment between institutions and graduate medical education (GME) regarding quality and safety initiatives (QI) has not been measured. The objective was to determine US internal medicine residency program directors’ (IM PDs) perceived resourcing for QI and alignment between GME and their institutions. A national survey of IM PDs was conducted in the Fall of 2013. Multivariable linear regression was used to test association between a novel Integration Score (IS) measuring alignment between GME and the institution via PD perceptions. The response rate was 72.6% (265/365). According to PDs, residents were highly engaged in QI (82%), but adequate funding (14%) and support personnel (37% to 61%) were lower. Higher IS correlated to reports of funding for QI (76.3% vs 54.5%, P = .012), QI personnel (67.3% vs 41.1%, P < .001), research experts (70.5% vs 50.0%, P < .001), and computer experts (69.0% vs 45.8%, P < .001) for QI assistance. Apparent mismatch between GME and institutional resources exists, and the IS may be useful in measuring GME–institutional leadership alignment in QI.
Liver dysfunction in chronic lymphocytic leukemia: Prevalence, outcomes, and pathological findings
Hampel, Paul J. , Chaffee, Kari G. , King, Rebecca L. , Simonetto, Douglas A. , Achenbach, Sara J., Call, Timothy G. , Ding, Wei , Leis, José F., Chanan‐Khan, Asher , Bowen, Deborah A., Conte, Michael, Schwager, Susan M., Hanson, Curtis A. , Parikh, Sameer A. , Rabe, Kari G. , SIMONETTO, DOUGLAS, Achenbach, Sara, Ding, Wei , Kenderian, Saad S. , Chanan-Khan, Asher A., Conte, Michael J, Parikh, Sameer A , Hampel, Paul J , Larson, Melissa C. , Slager, Susan L. , Kay, Neil E. , Shanafelt, Tait D. , Simonetto, Douglas A

Mayo Clinic

American Journal of Hematology | September 22, 2017 | Volume: 92 | Issue: 12 | Pages: 1362-1369

10.1002/ajh.24915 | PMID 28940587 Get It

AbstractThe prevalence of liver dysfunction and its association with outcomes in patients with previously untreated chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is unknown. Newly diagnosed (<12 months) previously untreated CLL patients seen at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN between 9/1993 and 4/2016 who had baseline assessment of at least one liver function test (LFT) were included in this analysis. The prevalence of liver dysfunction at baseline, proportion of patients who acquired LFT abnormalities, time to first therapy (TTFT) and overall survival (OS) were assessed. An abnormal LFT was present in 82/2336 (3.5%) patients at diagnosis and was associated with advanced Rai stage (Rai III–IV) (21% vs. 6%; P < .001), lower hemoglobin (13.1 g/dL vs. 13.9 g/dL; P < .001), and lower platelet count (187 × 109/L vs. 200 × 109/L; P = .03). Additionally, 236 patients with normal LFTs at diagnosis developed acquired liver dysfunction during follow‐up. Patients with abnormal LFTs at diagnosis had a shorter OS compared to those with normal LFTs (HR 1.80 95% CI 1.13‐2.87; P = .014, adjusted for age, sex, Rai stage, and treatment), although TTFT was not different. Of 52 patients who underwent a liver biopsy, CLL was present in liver tissue in 39/52 (73%) patients, with the portal tracts the most common region involved. Histopathology findings of liver involvement by CLL had limited correlation with choice of CLL therapy. In conclusion, approximately 1 of 25 newly diagnosed CLL patients has abnormal LFTs at diagnosis. Although the TTFT was not different among patients with abnormal LFTs, these patients have a shorter OS compared to those with normal LFTs.
Advancing Guideline Development in the United States: A Call to Action by the US GRADE Network
Morgan, Rebecca L. , Sultan, Shahnaz , Murad, M. Hassan , Helfand, Mark , Falck–Ytter, Yngve , Murad, M Hassan , Mustafa, Reem A , Dahm, Philipp , Qaseem, Amir , Morgan, Rebecca L

Mayo Clinic

American Journal of Medical Quality | August 28, 2017 | Volume: 33 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 117-118

10.1177/1062860617726855 | PMID 28845692 Get It

Abstract 4267: Association of polygenic risk scores and family history with the risk of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL)
Kleinstern, Geffen , Sanjosé, Sílvia de , Camp, Nicola J. , Call, Timothy G. , Liebow, Mark , Robinson, Dennis P. , Cunningham, Julie L. , Benavente, Yolanda , Monnereau, Alain , Spinelli, John, Vajdic, Claire M. , Kay, Neil E. , Cerhan, James R. , Slager, Susan L.

Mayo Clinic

Cancer Research | July 31, 2017 | Volume: 77 | Issue: 13_Supplement | Pages: 4267-4267

10.1158/1538-7445.am2017-4267 Get It

Abstract Background Thirty-four single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) are associated with CLL risk to-date. Moreover, family history (FH) of hematological malignancy has been consistently found to be associated with CLL, with an 8.5-fold increased risk of CLL among first-degree relatives. However, there has not been an evaluation of the interactive effects among genetic factors and FH with CLL risk. Methods We pooled data from 8 CLL case-control studies within the InterLymph Consortium (1499 CLL cases and 2601 controls). We computed a polygenic risk score (PRS), a weighted average of the number of risk alleles across the 34 SNPs, with the weights being the log of the previously reported odds ratio (OR) for each SNP. We categorized the PRS by quintiles using the cutoff points based on the distribution of all InterLymph controls (N=8228). Self-reported FH data was available for 60% of cases and 73% of controls. FH was defined as any hematological malignancy in one or more first-degree relative. Logistic regression was used to estimate ORs and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) adjusted for age, sex, socioeconomic status and study. Results The median age at diagnosis of CLL was 63 years and median age of consent was 60 years in the controls. 67% were male in CLL cases and 57% in controls. As expected, FH was associated with CLL risk (OR= 2.14, CI= 1.60-2.86). The median PRS in the cases was 0.40 and in the controls was -0.36 with the frequency of CLL cases in the upper PRS quintile as 48% while in the lowest quintile only 6%. The PRS was strongly associated with CLL risk (OR= 2.90, CI= 2.35-3.56 for upper versus middle quintile). When jointly modeling FH with PRS, a significant interaction was observed (P=0.03). When stratifying by FH, the upper quintile of the PRS had an 11.8-fold (CI= 3.97-34.8) increased risk relative to those in the middle quintile in the FH+ strata, while a 3.11-fold (CI= 2.35-4.10) increased risk was observed in the FH- strata. Conclusions Our data suggest that the PRS has a strong association with CLL risk and this association varies with FH status. Among those with FH-, the risk of CLL was 3-fold for those with many inherited variants while the CLL risk was much higher than that in those with a FH+. Studies are needed to see whether this PRS stratifies risk among those with monoclonal B-cell lymphocytosis, the CLL precursor condition that affects 5-7% of the general population. Citation Format: Geffen Kleinstern, Silvia de Sanjosé, Nicola Camp, Claire M. Vajdic, Timothy G. Call, Mark Liebow, Dennis Robinson, Neil E. Kay, Julie Cunningham, Yolanda Benavente, Alain Monnereau, John Spinelli, James R. Cerhan, Susan L. Slager. Association of polygenic risk scores and family history with the risk of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2017; 2017 Apr 1-5; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 4267. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-4267
American Heart Association’s Call to Action for Payment and Delivery System Reform
Bufalino, Vincent J., Berkowitz, Scott A., Gardner, Timothy J., Konig, Madeleine, Bauman, Mary Anne, Barbouche, Michael, Gibbons, Raymond J. , Meltzer, David , Meltzer, Neil M., Warner, John J., Piña, Ileana L. , Bauman, Mary Ann, Creager, Mark A. , Fonarow, Gregg C. , Schwamm, Lee H.

Mayo Clinic

Circulation | July 11, 2017 | Volume: 136 | Issue: 7 | Pages: No page available

10.1161/cir.0000000000000516 | PMID 28696250 Get It

The healthcare system is undergoing a transition from paying for volume to paying for value. Clinicians, as well as public and private payers, are beginning to implement alternative delivery and payment models, such as the patient-centered medical home, accountable care organizations, and bundled payment arrangements. Implementation of these new models will necessitate delivery system transformation and will actively involve all fields of medical care, in particular medicine and surgery. This call to action, on behalf of the American Heart Association’s Expert Panel on Payment and Delivery System Reform, serves to offer support and direction for further involvement by the American Heart Association. In doing so, it (1) provides baseline review and definition of the present models and some of the early results of these delivery models, including outcomes; (2) initiates a conversation within the American Heart Association on the impact of payment and delivery system reform, as well as how the American Heart Association should engage in the interest of patients; (3) issues a call to action to our organization and to cardiovascular and stroke health professionals across the country to become educated about these models so to as to understand their impact on patient care; and (4) asks the government and other funding agencies, including the American Heart Association, to begin supporting and prioritizing meaningful research endeavors to further evaluate these models.