Citations

Abstract Introduction: Previously, we detected amplification of chromosome 9p24.1 encoding PDL1, PDL2, and JAK2 (the PDJ amplicon) in up to 25% of triple negative breast cancers (TNBC) using oligonucleotide CGH arrays (aCGH). Amplification was associated with poor outcome and activation of the JAK/STAT pathway. Here, we have developed a novel fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for detection of the JAK2/PDL1 amplification. Methods: We selected five 9p24.1-amplified and five non-amplified paraffin embedded TNBC tumor samples, defined by aCGH log2ratio>2.0 as amplified for FISH validation. 5' JAK2 DNA labeled with SpectrumGreen dUTP, 3' JAK2 DNA labeled in SpectrumOrange dUTP and a commercially available chromosome 9 centromeric probe (Spectrum Aqua) were combined as one probe set. The break-apart (BAP) probe set was applied to individual slides, hybridized, and washed, 50 events/sample were counted. We defined 9p24.1 amplification by FISH as the ratio of average JAK2 score/ average centromere 9 (CEN 9) score >1.1. Nonparametric student's t-test was used for statistical analysis. Results: In the amplified subgroup (n=5), JAK2 amplification was detected by FISH with the range from 1.89 to 21.0 (mean, 6.76). To adjust for aneuploidy, the ratio of JAK2 to CEN 9 was measured with the range from 1.02 to 9.21 (mean ratio, 2.9). The sample with highest level of amplification (aCGH log2ratio =4) detected by aCGH also scored highest by FISH (FISH ratio=9.21). One case with JAK2 amplification (aCGH log2ratio =3) was not detected by FISH (ratio, 1.02), but had low tumor cell content. In the non-amplification subgroup (n=5), JAK2 amplification was detected by FISH with the range from 0.98 to 3.54 (mean, 1.8), the ratio of JAK2 to CEN 9 was measured with the range from 0.48 to1.05 (mean, 0.73). Of note, two tumors with copy number loss by aCGH were confirmed by FISH (ratio 0.48, 0.56). In total, the 9p24.1 amplification was detected in 4 out 5 (80%) amplified samples defined by aCGH and 5 out 5 not amplified. A significant difference in JAK2: CEN 9 ratio (p=0.03) was observed between the amplified and non-amplified subgroups but not in JAK2 absolute scores (p=0.095). Conclusion: In this study, we have developed a novel FISH assay for detection of the 9p24.1 amplification in TNBC, encoding JAK2, PD-L1, and PD-L2. The FISH assay correlates with detection of the amplification by aCGH, but is less sensitive, in particular in tissue with lower tumor cell content. We predict that 9p24.1 amplification will be a clinically relevant biomarker in TNBC. Citation Format: Chen M, Andreozzi M, Pockaj B, Barrett MT, Ocal IT, McCullough AE, Anderson KS. A novel fluorescence in situ hybridization assay to detect 9p24.1 amplification in triple negative breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2016 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2016 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-07-17.

Abstract Background: Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a heterogeneous disease. Amplification of chromosome 9p24.1 encoding JAK2 and PD-L1 has been reported in up to 25% of TNBC and is associated with poor clinical outcome. In lymphoma, JAK2 is a transcriptional activator of both PD-1 ligands, and chromosome 9p copy number gain has been associated with therapeutic activity of nivolumab. We evaluated the interaction of JAK2 and PD-L1 expression in TNBC. Methods: 9p24.1 amplification in 4 TNBC cell lines (MDA-MB-231, MDA-MB-436, HCC1937, and HCC70) was measured using array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH). Amplification was defined as aCGH log2ratio>2.0. Cell surface expression of PD-L1 was detected by flow cytometry and compared with the median fluorescence intensity (MFI) of isotype control Ig. To selectively inhibit JAK2, lentiviral vectors encoding two different shRNA were generated. JAK2, pSTAT1 and pSTAT3 expression were measured by immunoblot. The effects of the anti-JAK1/2 inhibitor ruxolitinib and interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) induction of PD-L1 was measured. Results: 9p24.1 copy number loss was measured in MDA-MB-231 (log2ratio =-1), neutral in HCC1937 ((log2ratio =0), gained in MDA-MB-436 ((log2ratio =+1) and amplified in HCC70 ((log2ratio =+2). No correlation was observed between PD-L1 expression and the 9p24.1 amplification, with the MFI ratio range from 5 to 16.5, mean 8.3 by flow cytometry. TNBC cell lines had higher baseline expression of PD-L1 compared to the ER+ cell lines T47D and MCF-7 (ratio, 0 p=0.1). Low dose IFN-γ (1.0-10.0 ng/ml) rapidly induced expression of PD-L1 in MDA-MB-231 (1.5 fold increase) and HCC70 (3.3 fold increase) with significant activation of the JAK2/STAT1 pathway. The induction of pSTAT1 and PD-L1 expression by IFN-γ was blocked with low dose (1mM) JAK1/2 inhibitor ruxolitinib. Knockdown of JAK2 with shRNA (>80%) did not impact PD-L1 baseline expression in MDA-MB-231 and HCC70 but abrogated IFN-γ –mediated induction of PD-L1 and the phosphorylation of STAT1. Conclusion: These data suggest that TNBC cell lines have baseline PD-L1 expression, but the cells with 9p24.1 amplification are highly sensitive to PD-L1 induction with IFN-γ which can be abrogated with inhibition with a JAK1/2 inhibitor or shRNA. Synergistic inhibition of PD1/PD-L1 and JAK2 may have therapeutic efficacy in the subset of TNBC with 9p24.1 amplification, and the dynamic effects of tumor PD-L1 expression in response to local inflammation should be considered in the evaluation of PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint blockade. Citation Format: Chen M, Pockaj B, Andreozzi M, Barrett MT, Ocal IT, McCullough AE, Krishna S, Anderson KS. JAK2 and PD-L1 amplification enhance the dynamic expression of PD-L1 in triple negative breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2016 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2016 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-04-18.

PurposeTo compare algorithms performing material decomposition and classification in dual‐energy CT, it is desirable to know the ground truth of the lesion to be analyzed in real patient data. In this work, we developed and validated a framework to insert digital lesions of arbitrary chemical composition into patient projection data acquired on a dual‐source, dual‐energy CT system.MethodsA model that takes into account beam‐hardening effects was developed to predict the CT number of objects with known chemical composition. The model utilizes information about the x‐ray energy spectra, the patient/phantom attenuation, and the x‐ray detector energy response. The beam‐hardening model was validated on samples of iodine (I) and calcium (Ca) for a second‐generation dual‐source, dual‐energy CT scanner for all tube potentials available and a wide range of patient sizes. The seven most prevalent mineral components of renal stones were modeled and digital stones were created with CT numbers computed for each patient/phantom size and x‐ray energy spectra using the developed beam‐hardening model. Each digital stone was inserted in the dual‐energy projection data of a water phantom scanned on a dual‐source scanner and reconstructed with the routine algorithms in use in our practice. The geometry of the forward projection for dual‐energy data was validated by comparing CT number accuracy and high‐contrast resolution of simulated dual‐energy CT data of the ACR phantom with experimentally acquired data.ResultsThe beam‐hardening model and forward projection method accurately predicted the CT number of I and Ca over a wide range of tube potentials and phantom sizes. The images reconstructed after the insertion of digital kidney stones were consistent with the images reconstructed from the scanner, and the CT number ratios for different kidney stone types were consistent with data in the literature. A sample application of the proposed tool was also demonstrated.ConclusionA framework was developed and validated for the creation of digital objects of known mineral composition, and for inserting the digital objects into projection data from a commercial dual‐source, dual‐energy CT scanner. Among other applications, it will allow a systematic investigation of the impact of scan and reconstruction parameters on kidney stone dual‐energy properties under rigorously controlled conditions.

LBA2 Background: Docetaxel (D) improves OS of men with mPrCa who have progressed on androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). We aimed to assess the benefit of upfront chemohormonal therapy for metastatic PrCa. Methods: 1:1 randomization to ADT alone or ADT + D dosed 75mg/m2 every 3 weeks for 6 cycles within 4 month (mos) of starting ADT. Stratification factors: high volume (HV) vs. low volume (LV) disease (HV: visceral metastases and/or 4 or more bone metastases); anti-androgen use beyond 30 days; Age ≥70 vs. < 70 years; ECOG PS 0-1 vs. 2; Prior adjuvant ADT > 12 vs. ≤ 12 mos; FDA approved drug for delaying skeletal related events. Key eligibility criteria: suitable organ and neurological function for D; adjuvant ADT ≤ 24 mos and no progression within 12 mos of adjuvant ADT. OS was the primary endpoint and the study was powered to assess for a 33.3% improvement in median OS (80% power and 1-sided alpha=2.5%). Projected median OS for ADT alone: HV-33 mos; LV-67 mos. Results: 790 men were accrued from 7/28/06 to 11/21/2012: ADT N=393; ADT + D: N=397; balanced for demographic, stratification and disease factors. Median age: 63 years (range: 36 to 91); 98% ECOG PS 0 or 1; 89% Caucasian; 24% prior radiotherapy, 24% prior prostatectomy; HV 64% on ADT and 67% on ADT + D. Data released after 4th interim analysis in Sept 2013 when O’Brien Fleming upper boundary was crossed with 53.1% information. This report reflects 1/16/2014 data with median follow-up of 29 mos with 137 deaths on ADT alone vs. 104 deaths on ADT+D. ADT+D: Grade (G) 3/4 Neutropenic fever: 4%/2%; G3 neuropathy: 1% sensory, 1% motor; 1 death due to treatment (no deaths due to treatment on ADT). Efficacy data is in the table below. After disease progression, 123 pts on ADT alone and 45 pts on ADT + D received docetaxel. Conclusions: ADT + D improves OS over ADT alone in men with HV mPrCa. Longer follow-up is needed for men with LV mPrCa. Clinical trial information: NCT00309985. [Table: see text]

347 Background: 9,704 was the first phase 3 pancreatic cancer trial to validate the prognostic value of postresection CA19-9 for overall survival (OS), with values > 90/180 associated with worse OS. All pts received adjuvant gemcitabine or 5-FU and chemo-radiotherapy (RT). This analysis evaluates patterns of disease failure. Methods: SMS was negative, positive, or unknown. CA19-9 was analyzed at cut points 90, 180 and continuously. LRF and DF were estimated by cumulative incidence and Gray’s test compared. Cox hazard models were used for multivariate analyses (MVA) and included treatment, tumor site, size and nodal status. To adjust for multiple comparisons a p-value < 0.01 is statistically significant and 0.01 to < 0.05 a trend. Results: 538 pts accrued, with 451 eligible and analyzable for SMS and 385 for CA19-9. For CA19-9, 132 (34%) were Lewis Antigen negative (no CA19-9 expression), 200 (52%) < 90 and 220 (57%) < 180. 188 (42%) had negative margins, 152 (34%) positive and 111 (25%) unknown (i.e., no margin comment in path report; shown to have outcomes similar to negative margin pts). Pts with CA19-9 ≥ 180 were more likely to have tumors ≥ 3 cm and pts with positive SMS more likely to have KPS 60 - 80, T3/T4, or N1 disease. On univariate analysis (UVA) CA19-9 cut at 90 was associated with significant increases in both LRF (trend) and DF; in the gemcitabine arm this was seen in DF, not in LRF; in the 5-FU arm it was seen in both. Results were similar at the 180 cut point and continuously. SMS on UVA was not associated with increase in LRF/DF; see Table. On MVA, CA19-9 > 90 was significantly associated with LRF and DF; positive SMS showed only a trend for DF. Conclusions: Postresection CA19-9 has significant association with both LRF and DF not seen with SMS. These findings support continued use of RT in trials and consideration of dose intensification among pts with elevated postresection CA19-9. Grants: NCI U10, CA21661, CA37422, CA180868, CA180822. Clinical trial information: 0000000. [Table: see text]

TPS482 Background: Two combination chemotherapy regimens have emerged as standard of care options for first-line treatment of mPAC: 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/leucovorin (LV) + irinotecan + oxaliplatin (FOLFIRINOX), and nab-paclitaxel + gemcitabine. Nal-IRI (MM-398) is a nanoliposomal formulation of irinotecan. In a randomized phase 3 study (NAPOLI-1), of patients with mPAC who had been previously treated with gemcitabine-based therapy, nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV demonstrated its safety and significant clinical activity, increasing overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) relative to 5-FU/LV. The goal of this current study is to determine the preliminary safety and efficacy of nal-IRI+ + 5-FU/LV with or without oxaliplatin as compared to nab-paclitaxel + gemcitabine in previously untreated patients with mPAC. Methods: This open-label, phase 2 comparative study will be conducted in two parts. Part 1 is a safety run-in of a nal-IRI+5-FU/LV + oxaliplatin regimen. The safety run-in will enroll small cohorts of patients following a traditional 3 + 3 dose escalation design to confirm the target dose of oxaliplatin (n = ~6-18). The primary objective of Part 1 is the safety and tolerability of nal-IRI + 5FU/LV + oxaliplatin. Part 2 is a randomized, efficacy study of a nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV + oxaliplatin regimen (Arm 1), the nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV combination that previously demonstrated efficacy in the NAPOLI-1 trial (Arm 2), versus a nab-paclitaxel + gemcitabine control arm (Arm 3) (n = ~156-168). The primary objective of Part 2 is to assess the efficacy of nal-IRI-containing regimens in first-line mPAC patients compared to nab-paclitaxel + gemcitabine using the progression-free survival (PFS) rate at 24 weeks as the primary endpoint. Secondary of part 1 is a PK study and Part 2 secondary endpoints will include OS, PFS, objective response rate (per RECIST, v1.1), decrease in CA19-9 levels and quality of life assessments. Clinical trial information: NCT02551991.

TPS474 Background: In pts with APC, the distal common bile duct is frequently obstructed, which can lead to elevated bilirubin levels. Normalization of bilirubin by stenting can take weeks, so treatment options that could be initiated in pts with elevated bilirubin are desirable. In a phase III trial of pts with metastatic PC, nab-P + Gem demonstrated superior efficacy vs Gem alone for all endpoints, including overall survival (OS; median, 8.7 vs 6.6 months; hazard ratio, 0.72; P < 0.001). This study will be the first to analyze safety and PK profiles of nab-P + Gem in pts with APC and CH secondary to bile duct obstruction. Methods: Treatment-naive pts (≈ 12 to 40) with APC, Karnofsky performance status ≥ 70, and CH due to bile duct obstruction are eligible. Pts with a biliary stent must have 2 stable (within 20% of each other) bilirubin readings within 48 to 72 hours of each other taken between 5 and 21 days after stenting. Exclusion criteria consist of brain metastases, any other active malignancy, infection requiring systemic therapy, a history of myocardial infarction, or current use of medications known to be strong inducers of CYP3A4 and CYP2C8. Pts will enter 1 of 2 cohorts based on bilirubin level: cohort 1, > 1.5 to 3 × upper limit of normal (ULN), or cohort 2, > 3 to 5 × ULN. Cohort 2 will proceed only after review of safety and PK data from cohort 1 by a safety monitoring committee (SMC) and a decision has been made to proceed. The starting doses are nab-P 100 mg/m2 and Gem 800 mg/m2 for cohort 1 and nab-P 75 mg/m2 and Gem 600 mg/m2 for cohort 2. Treatment will be administered on days 1, 8, and 15 of each 28-day cycle. Doses in each cohort will be modified according to tolerability as determined by the SMC. The primary endpoints are determination of maximum tolerated dose for each cohort and PK profile. Secondary endpoints include investigator-assessed objective response rate, progression-free survival, OS, PK profile of Gem, and safety. The exploratory endpoint is change in serum CA19-9 level from baseline. Enrollment is ongoing. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02267707. Clinical trial information: NCT02267707.