Citations

AbstractMulti‐energy computed tomography (MECT) offers the opportunity for advanced visualization, detection, and quantification of select elements (e.g., iodine) or materials (e.g., fat) beyond the capability of standard single‐energy computed tomography (CT). However, the use of MECT requires careful consideration as substantially different hardware and software approaches have been used by manufacturers, including different sets of user‐selected or hidden parameters that affect the performance and radiation dose of MECT. Another important consideration when designing MECT protocols is appreciation of the specific tasks being performed; for instance, differentiating between two different materials or quantifying a specific element. For a given task, it is imperative to consider both the radiation dose and task‐specific image quality requirements. Development of a quality control (QC) program is essential to ensure the accuracy and reproducibility of these MECT applications. Although standard QC procedures have been well established for conventional single‐energy CT, the substantial differences between single‐energy CT and MECT in terms of system implementations, imaging protocols, and clinical tasks warrant QC tests specific to MECT. This task group was therefore charged with developing a systematic QC program designed to meet the needs of MECT applications. In this report, we review the various MECT approaches that are commercially available, including information about hardware implementation, MECT image types, image reconstruction, and postprocessing techniques that are unique to MECT. We address the requirements for MECT phantoms, review representative commercial MECT phantoms, and offer guidance regarding homemade MECT phantoms. We discuss the development of MECT protocols, which must be designed carefully with proper consideration of MECT technology, imaging task, and radiation dose. We then outline specific recommended QC tests in terms of general image quality, radiation dose, differentiation and quantification tasks, and diagnostic and therapeutic applications.

Abstract Although the functions of tyrosine phosphatases in T‐cell biology have been extensively studied, our knowledge on the contribution of serine/threonine phosphatases in T cells remains poor. Protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A) is one of the most abundantly expressed serine/threonine phosphatases. It is important in thymocyte development and CD4 + T‐cell differentiation. Utilizing a genetic model in which its catalytic subunit alpha isoform (PP2A Cα) is deleted in T cells, we investigated its contribution to CD8 + T‐cell homeostasis and effector functions. Our results demonstrate that T‐cell intrinsic PP2A Cα is critically required for CD8 + T‐cell homeostasis in secondary lymphoid organs and intestinal mucosal site. Importantly, PP2A Cα–deficient CD8 + T cells exhibit reduced proliferation and survival. CD8 + T‐cell antibacterial response is strictly dependent on PP2A Cα. Expression of Bcl2 transgene rescues CD8 + T‐cell homeostasis in spleens, but not in intestinal mucosal site, nor does it restore defective antibacterial responses. Finally, proteomics and phosphoproteomics analyses reveal potential targets dependent on PP2A Cα, including mTORC1 and AKT. Thus, PP2A Cα is a key modulator of CD8 + T‐cell homeostasis and effector functions.

Importance Half of all carriers of inherited cancer-predisposing variants in BRCA1 and BRCA2 are male, but the implications for their health are underrecognized compared to female individuals. Germline variants in BRCA1 and BRCA2 (also known as pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants, referred to here as BRCA1/2 PVs) are well known to significantly increase the risk of breast and ovarian cancers in female carriers, and knowledge of BRCA1/2 PVs informs established cancer screening and options for risk reduction. While risks to male carriers of BRCA1/2 PVs are less characterized, there is convincing evidence of increased risk for prostate cancer, pancreatic cancer, and breast cancer in males. There has also been a rapid expansion of US Food and Drug Administration–approved targeted cancer therapies, including poly ADP ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors, for breast, pancreatic, and prostate cancers associated with BRCA1/2 PVs. Observations This narrative review summarized the data that inform cancer risks, targeted cancer therapy options, and guidelines for early cancer detection. It also highlighted areas of emerging research and clinical trial opportunities for male BRCA1/2 PV carriers. These developments, along with the continued relevance to family cancer risk and reproductive options, have informed changes to guideline recommendations for genetic testing and strengthened the case for increased genetic testing for males. Conclusions and Relevance Despite increasing clinical actionability for male carriers of BRCA1/2 PVs, far fewer males than female individuals undergo cancer genetic testing. Oncologists, internists, and primary care clinicians should be vigilant about offering appropriate genetic testing to males. Identifying more male carriers of BRCA1/2 PVs will maximize opportunities for cancer early detection, targeted risk management, and cancer treatment for males, along with facilitating opportunities for risk reduction and prevention in their family members, thereby decreasing the burden of hereditary cancer.

Importance The clinical effects of risankizumab (a monoclonal antibody that selectively targets the p19 subunit of IL-23) for the treatment of ulcerative colitis are unknown. Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of risankizumab when administered as an induction and a maintenance therapy for patients with ulcerative colitis. Design, Setting, and Participants Two phase 3 randomized clinical trials were conducted. The induction trial was conducted at 261 clinical centers (in 41 countries) and enrolled 977 patients from November 5, 2020, to August 4, 2022 (final follow-up on May 16, 2023). The maintenance trial was conducted at 238 clinical centers (in 37 countries) and enrolled 754 patients from August 28, 2018, to March 30, 2022 (final follow-up on April 11, 2023). Eligible patients had moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis; a history of intolerance or inadequate response to 1 or more conventional therapies, advanced therapies, or both types of therapies; and no prior exposure to risankizumab. Interventions For the induction trial, patients were randomized 2:1 to receive 1200 mg of risankizumab or placebo administered intravenously at weeks 0, 4, and 8. For the maintenance trial, patients with a clinical response (determined using the adapted Mayo score) after intravenous treatment with risankizumab were randomized 1:1:1 to receive subcutaneous treatment with 180 mg or 360 mg of risankizumab or placebo (no longer receiving risankizumab) every 8 weeks for 52 weeks. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was clinical remission (stool frequency score ≤1 and not greater than baseline, rectal bleeding score of 0, and endoscopic subscore ≤1 without friability) at week 12 for the induction trial and at week 52 for the maintenance trial. Results Among the 975 patients analyzed in the induction trial (aged 42.1 [SD, 13.8] years; 586/973 [60.1%] were male; and 677 [69.6%] were White), the clinical remission rates at week 12 were 132/650 (20.3%) for 1200 mg of risankizumab and 20/325 (6.2%) for placebo (adjusted between-group difference, 14.0% [95% CI, 10.0%-18.0%], P < .001). Among the 548 patients analyzed in the maintenance trial (aged 40.9 [SD, 14.0] years; 313 [57.1%] were male; and 407 [74.3%] were White), the clinical remission rates at week 52 were 72/179 (40.2%) for 180 mg of risankizumab, 70/186 (37.6%) for 360 mg of risankizumab, and 46/183 (25.1%) for placebo (adjusted between-group difference for 180 mg of risankizumab vs placebo, 16.3% [97.5% CI, 6.1%-26.6%], P < .001; adjusted between-group difference for 360 mg of risankizumab vs placebo, 14.2% [97.5% CI, 4.0%-24.5%], P = .002). No new safety risks were detected in the treatment groups. Conclusion and Relevance Compared with placebo, risankizumab improved clinical remission rates in an induction trial and in a maintenance trial for patients with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis. Further study is needed to identify benefits beyond the 52-week follow-up. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifiers: NCT03398148 and NCT03398135

Abstract Objectives To examine the clinicopathologic features of patients with polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) who had thoracic aorta repair surgery. Findings were compared with those of a cohort of patients with giant cell arteritis (GCA) requiring thoracic aorta repair. Methods All patients evaluated at Mayo Clinic in Rochester, MN, with Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes for thoracic aorta repair surgery between 2000–2021 were identified. All patients were screened for prior PMR diagnosis. Patients with PMR and no signs of GCA were categorized as clinically isolated PMR. The medical records of all patients were manually reviewed, and pathologists re-examined all the aortic tissues. Results Of the 4621 patients with at least one CPT code for thoracic aorta repair surgery, 43 patients were diagnosed with clinically isolated PMR before the surgery. Detailed histopathological examination of the aortic tissues revealed active inflammation in 30/43 (70%) patients after a median (IQR) of 10.0 (4.7–13.3) years from the PMR diagnosis. When compared with aortic tissue from patients with a prior diagnosis of GCA, the aorta of patients with PMR had more severe inflammation (Grade 3: 15/30 [50%] vs 5/34 [15%], P = 0.002). Patients with PMR and thoracic aorta repair may experience a 40% increased risk of mortality compared with the general population, but this did not reach statistical significance (standardized mortality ratio: 1.40; 95% CI: 0.91–2.07). Conclusions Some patients with PMR have subclinical aortic inflammation that is detectable many years after initial diagnosis and may contribute to the development of aortic aneurysm.

INTRODUCTION: Early neoplastic progression of Barrett's esophagus (BE) is often treated with endoscopic therapy. Although effective, some patients are refractory to therapy or recur after apparent eradication of the BE. The goal of this study was to determine whether genomic alterations within the treated BE may be associated with persistent or recurrent disease. METHODS: We performed DNA sequencing on pre-treatment esophageal samples from 45 patients who were successfully treated by endoscopic therapy and did not recur as well as pre-treatment and post-treatment samples from 40 patients who had persistent neoplasia and 21 patients who had recurrent neoplasia. The genomic alterations were compared between groups. RESULTS: The genomic landscape was similar between all groups. Patients with persistent disease were more likely to have pre-treatment alterations involving the receptor tyrosine kinase pathway ( P = 0.01), amplifications of oncogenes ( P = 0.01), and deletions of tumor suppressor genes ( P = 0.02). These associations were no longer significant after adjusting for patient age and BE length. More than half of patients with persistent (52.5%) or recurrent (57.2%) disease showed pre-treatment and post-treatment samples that shared at least 50% of their driver mutations. DISCUSSION: Pre-treatment samples were genomically similar between those who responded to endoscopic therapy and those who had persistent or recurrent disease, suggesting there is not a strong genomic component to treatment response. Although it was expected to find shared driver mutations in pre-treatment and post-treatment samples in patients with persistent disease, the finding that an equal number of patients with recurrent disease also showed this relation suggests that many recurrences represent undetected minimal residual disease.

Metabolic dysfunctions are among the best documented hallmarks of ageing. Cardiovascular disease, Alzheimer’s disease, cancer, type 2 diabetes mellitus, metabolic-dysfunction-associated steatosis liver disease, and fragility fractures are diseases of hyperinsulinaemia that reduce life and healthspan. We studied the effect of suppressing ketosis in 10 lean (BMI 20.5 kg/m2 ± 1.4), metabolically healthy, pre-menopausal women (age 32.3 ± 8.9 years) maintaining nutritional ketosis (NK) for an average of 3.9 years (± 2.3) who underwent three 21-day phases: nutritional ketosis (NK; P1), suppressed ketosis (SuK; P2), and returned to NK (P3). Ketosis suppression significantly increased insulin, 1.83-fold (p = 0.0006); glucose, 1.17-fold (p = 0.0088); homeostasis model assessment for insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), 2.13-fold (p = 0.0008); leptin, 3.35-fold (p = 0.0010); total osteocalcin, 1.63-fold (p = 0.0138); and uncarboxylated osteocalcin, 1.98-fold (p = 0.0417) and significantly decreased beta-hydroxybutyrate, 13.50-fold (p = 0.0012) and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1), 2.40-fold (p = 0.0209). Sustained NK showed no adverse health effects and may mitigate hyperinsulinemia. All biomarkers returned to basal P1 levels after removing the intervention for SuK, indicating that metabolic flexibility was maintained with long-term euketonaemia.

TPS4205 Background: Multiple lines of evidence support the use of platinum-based chemotherapy for patients with homologous recombination deficiency-associated pancreatic adenocarcinoma (HRD PDAC; 15-20%). However, the impact of the specific platinum agent used remains uncertain. Mechanistically, oxaliplatin and cisplatin act distinctly on cancer cells, reflected in disparate toxicity profiles and target disease indications; furthermore, preclinical studies have shown that BRCA2-deficient cell lines and mice demonstrate significantly greater sensitivity to cisplatin compared to oxaliplatin. While oxaliplatin, part of the FOLFIRINOX regimen, represents the most commonly used platinum analogue for PDAC, clinical data shows that cisplatin (in combination with gemcitabine) can produce robust response rates (~70%) specifically in patients with germline BRCA/PALB2-mutated metastatic PDAC. We therefore designed a randomized clinical trial (PLATINUM) through the Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology cooperative group to assess the optimal chemotherapy regimen in patients with HRD-associated metastatic PDAC following front-line FOLFIRINOX and to test the hypothesis that a platinum switch strategy will be beneficial. Methods: The study consists of a seamless phase II/III design, with the primary endpoint of the phase III component being overall survival. Eligible patients will have metastatic PDAC, a confirmed pathogenic BRCA1/2 or PALB2 mutation (somatic or germline), and demonstrated disease progression on front-line FOLFIRINOX, with or without subsequent PARP inhibitor maintenance. Patients will be randomized 1:1 to receive (1) the de facto standard of gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel; or (2) the experimental 3-drug combination of gemcitabine, nab-paclitaxel, and cisplatin (NABPLAGEM), which has been previously studied in non-biomarker-selected patients with advanced biliary tract cancer (SWOG1815) and metastatic PDAC. Both treatment arms will use a once every other week dosing schedule. A total of 100 patients will be enrolled, which provides 90% power to detect an effect size of hazard ratio 0.5 (median OS of 18 vs 9 months) at a one-sided alpha of 0.05. Reports containing efficacy, adverse events, and administrative information will be provided to the Alliance DSMB every 6 months. Planned correlatives include ctDNA analysis for BRCA reversion mutations in all patients, as well as whole genome and transcriptome sequencing in an optional biopsy cohort. This study was activated in December 2023. Clinical trial information: NCT06115499 .

TPS2682 Background: Myeloid cells are actively recruited to the solid tumor microenvironment (TME) and have the potential to mediate tumor control via phagocytosis, TME remodeling, and T cell activation. We previously developed human chimeric antigen receptor macrophages (CAR-M) and have shown potent anti-tumor activity in pre-clinical solid tumor models. The anti-HER2 CAR-M cell therapy product, CT-0508, is currently being evaluated in a Phase I trial as a monotherapy and in combination with pembrolizumab. Early clinical data have shown feasibility, safety, and validated the mechanism of action. We have developed a next-generation CAR monocyte (CAR-Mono) platform to increase the dose, improve tumor trafficking and engraftment, and shorten the manufacturing and vein-to-vein time as compared to CAR-M therapy. CT-0525 is an autologous anti-HER2 CAR-Mono cell therapy based on CD14+ monocytes engineered with an Ad5f35 adenoviral vector to express an anti-HER2 CAR. Pre-clinical studies have demonstrated the feasibility, phenotype, pharmacokinetics, durable CAR expression, cellular fate, antigen specificity, and anti-tumor activity of CT-0525. Pre-clinical studies have shown that CT-0525 differentiated into pro-inflammatory CAR-M in vivo and controlled tumor growth. The CT-0525 manufacturing process takes one day and enables the production of up to 10 billion cells from a single apheresis. CT-0525 is being investigated in a first-in-human, open-label, multi-center, Phase I study in patients with HER2 overexpressing solid tumors. Methods: This Phase 1, first-in-human study evaluates the feasibility, safety, tolerability, trafficking, TME activation, and preliminary evidence of efficacy of the investigational CAR-Mono product CT-0525 in 6 participants (pts) with locally advanced unresectable/metastatic solid tumors overexpressing HER2. Pts previously treated with anti-HER2 therapies are eligible. Filgrastim mobilized autologous CD14+ monocytes are collected by apheresis, followed by manufacturing and cryopreservation. The 1st cohort of pts (n=3) will receive 3 x 109 CT-0525 CAR positive monocytes administered IV in one infusion. If tolerated as per the modified toxicity probability interval algorithm (mTPI), the 2nd cohort of pts (n=3) will receive up to 10 x 109 CT-0525 CAR positive monocytes in one infusion. CT-0525 will be administered without conditioning chemotherapy. Primary endpoints include assessment of safety and tolerability, as well as manufacture feasibility. Correlative assessments include pre- and post-treatment biopsies and blood samples for safety, immunogenicity, pharmacokinetics, tumor trafficking, TME modulation, epitope spreading, and other translational biomarkers. Clinical trial information: NCT06254807 .