Citations

ABSTRACTIntroductionThis study examined simultaneous pancreas–kidney transplant (SPKt) in Black and White patients to identify disparities in transplantation, days on the waitlist, and reasons for SPKt waitlist removal.MethodsUsing the United Network for Organ Sharing Standard Transplant Analysis and Research file, patients between January 1, 2009, and May 31, 2021, were included. Three cohorts (overall, SPKt recipients only, and those not transplanted) were selected using propensity score matching. Conditional logistic regression was used for categorical outcomes. Days on the waitlist were compared using negative binomial regression.ResultsBlack patients had increased odds of receiving a SPKt (OR, 1.25 [95% CI, 1.11–1.40], p < 0.001). White patients had increased odds of receiving a kidney‐only transplant (OR 0.48 [95% CI, 0.38–0.61], p < 0.001), and specifically increased odds of receiving a living donor kidney (OR 0.34 [0.25–0.45], p < 0.001).ConclusionThis study found that Black patients are more likely to receive a SPKt. Results suggest that there are opportunities for additional inquiry related to patient removal from the waitlist, particularly considering White patients received or accepted more kidney‐only transplants and were more likely to receive a living donor kidney‐only transplant.

e16301 Background: Outcomes for patients with Stage 3 pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remain poor with a mean overall survival (OS) of 11 months. Irreversible electroporation (IRE) is a method of local tumor ablation that causes cell death by disrupting homeostasis in the cell membrane. Previous research suggests IRE can be useful in the multi-disciplinary treatment of Stage 3 PDAC. The present study was designed to assess the effectiveness and safety of IRE for Stage 3 PDAC in a real-world setting after induction chemotherapy. Methods: Patients with Stage 3 PDAC treated with IRE were prospectively enrolled in a multicenter registry study. Enrollment required 3 months of active multi-agent chemotherapy, with no progression before IRE treatment. Endpoints were 30- and 90-day mortality from enrollment and the new onset of an adverse event (AE). Results: 87 patients were enrolled in the registry between May 2019 and May 2023. Mean age was 64.0 ± 8.4 years, 57.5% were female and mean tumor diameter was 2.2 ± 0.7 cm. Mean time from diagnosis to IRE treatment was 8.9 ± 4.9 months. All subjects underwent induction chemotherapy with the most common being FOLFIRINOX alone, gemcitabine with albumin-bound paclitaxel, or a combination of both in 47 (54.0%) patients. Thirty-seven (42.5%) patients had prior radiation therapy. All procedures were performed using an open approach with 50 (57.5%) for in-situ tumor ablation and 37 (42.5%) with the intent of margin accentuation in combination with resection. Major adjunctive procedures were performed for 70 (80.5%) patients. Common adjunctive surgeries were cholecystectomy (33.3%), Whipple procedure (28.7%) and either distal or subtotal pancreatectomy (11.4%). Mean IRE delivery time was 55.7 ± 54.5 minutes with an average of 3.1 probes (range 2 to 6) used per procedure. There was a mean of 1031.1 ± 882.1 pulses delivered per procedure. The 30- and 90-day mortality was 3/87 (3.4%) and 4/82 (4.9%) respectively. There were 21 (24.1%) patients who developed AEs related to IRE treatment during the 90-day post-procedure period (9 patients had AEs that were definitely related to IRE, 5 probably and 7 possibly). Of these related events, only three were Grade 4 or higher (arterial hemorrhage, cardiac arrest, and septic shock). Overall, gastrointestinal related AEs were the most common representing 16 of the 28 (57.1%) of all AEs associated with the IRE procedure. One patient died within 30 days of the procedure due to an intraperitoneal arterial hemorrhage that was deemed to be definitely related to the IRE treatment. Conclusions: The use of IRE for curative intent tumor ablation alone or in combination with resection following induction chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced Stage 3 PDAC has acceptable safety and is associated with acceptable morbidity and mortality rates in appropriately selected patients. Clinical trial information: NCT03899649 .

Abstract Background Few antiviral therapies have been studied in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and kidney impairment. Herein, the efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of remdesivir, its metabolites, and sulfobutylether-β-cyclodextrin excipient were evaluated in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 and severe kidney impairment. Methods In REDPINE, a phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, participants aged ≥12 years hospitalized for COVID-19 pneumonia with acute kidney injury, chronic kidney disease, or kidney failure were randomized 2:1 to receive intravenous remdesivir (200 mg on day 1; 100 mg daily up to day 5) or placebo (enrollment from March 2021 to March 2022). The primary efficacy end point was the composite of the all-cause mortality rate or invasive mechanical ventilation rate through day 29. Safety was evaluated through day 60. Results Although enrollment concluded early, 243 participants were enrolled and treated (remdesivir, n = 163; placebo, n = 80). At baseline, 90 participants (37.0%) had acute kidney injury (remdesivir, n = 60; placebo, n = 30), 64 (26.3%) had chronic kidney disease (remdesivir, n = 44; placebo, n = 20), and 89 (36.6%) had kidney failure (remdesivir, n = 59; placebo, n = 30); and 31 (12.8%) were vaccinated against COVID-19. Composite all-cause mortality or invasive mechanical ventilation rates through day 29 were 29.4% and 32.5% in the remdesivir and placebo group, respectively (P = .61). Treatment-emergent adverse events were reported in 80.4% for remdesivir versus 77.5% for placebo, and serious adverse events in 50.3% versus 50.0%, respectively. Pharmacokinetic plasma exposure to remdesivir was not affected by kidney function. Conclusions Although the study was underpowered, no significant difference in efficacy was observed between treatment groups. REDPINE demonstrated that remdesivir is safe in patients with COVID-19 and severe kidney impairment. Clinical Trials Registration EudraCT 2020-005416-22; Clinical Trials.gov NCT04745351.

Abstract Background White matter (WM) abnormalities have been implicated in clinically relevant functional decline in multiple system atrophy (MSA). Objective To identify the WM and gray matter (GM) abnormalities in MSA and assess the utility of longitudinal structural and diffusion changes as surrogate markers for tracking disease progression in MSA. Methods Twenty‐seven participants with early MSA [15 with clinically predominant cerebellar (MSA‐C) and 12 with clinically predominant parkinsonian features (MSA‐P)] and 14 controls were enrolled as a part of our prospective, longitudinal study of synucleinopathies. Using structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and diffusion MRI (diffusion tensor and neurite orientation and dispersion density imaging), we analyzed whole and regional brain changes in these participants. We also evaluated temporal imaging trajectories based on up to three annual follow‐up scans and assessed the impact of baseline diagnosis on these imaging biomarkers using mixed‐effect models. Results MSA patients exhibited more widespread WM changes than GM, particularly in the cerebellum and brainstem, with greater severity in MSA‐C. Structural and diffusion measures in the cerebellum WM and brainstem deteriorated with disease progression. Rates of progression of these abnormalities were similar in both MSA subtypes, reflecting increasing overlap of clinical features over time. Conclusion WM abnormalities are core features of MSA disease progression and advance at similar rates in clinical MSA subtypes. Multimodal MRI imaging reveals novel insights into the distribution and pattern of brain abnormalities and their progression in MSA. Selected structural and diffusion measures may be useful for tracking disease progression in MSA clinical trials.

TPS3633 Background: For patients with oligometastatic colorectal cancer (CRC), aggressive local therapy of isolated metastases, particularly in the liver, has been associated with long-term progression-free and overall survival (OS) primarily based on retrospective evidence. However, in patients with limited metastatic CRC that is deemed inoperable or those with additional disease outside of the liver or lungs, the role of local ablative therapies, including microwave ablation (MWA) and stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), to render patients disease free is less clear. Further, despite the long history of treating oligometastatic CRC with local therapy, which is provider biased and not evidence based, questions remain regarding the benefit of extending the paradigm of metastatic directed therapy to patients with more extensive disease. This trial seeks to use a pragmatic multimodality approach that mirrors the current clinical dilemma. This study is designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of adding total ablative therapy (TAT) of all sites of disease to standard of care systemic treatment in those with limited metastatic CRC. Methods: A022101/NRG-GI009 is a National Clinical Trials Network randomized phase III study planned to enroll 364 patients with newly diagnosed metastatic CRC (BRAF wild-type, microsatellite stable) with ≤4 sites of metastatic disease on baseline imaging. Liver-only metastatic disease is not permitted, and lesions must be amenable to any combination of surgical resection, MWA, and/or SBRT with SBRT required for at least 1 lesion. Patients receive first-line systemic therapy for 16-26 weeks and are then randomized 1:1, stratified by number of metastatic organ sites (1-2 vs. 3-4), timing of metastatic disease diagnosis (de novo vs. secondary), and presence of metastatic disease outside the liver/lungs in at least 1 site. Patients in Arm 1 will receive TAT consisting of treatment of all metastatic sites with SBRT ± MWA ± surgical resection followed by standard of care systemic therapy. Patients in Arm 2 will continue with standard of care systemic therapy alone. The primary endpoint is OS. Secondary endpoints include event-free survival, treatment-related toxicities, and local recurrence with exploratory biomarker analyses. The study needs 346 evaluable patients combined in the 2 arms to demonstrate an improvement in OS with a hazard ratio of 0.7 to provide 80% power with a one-sided alpha of 5%. The trial utilizes a group sequential design with two interim analyses (25% and 50% of events) for futility. The trial activated in January 2023 and recruitment is ongoing. Support: U10CA180821, U10CA180882; https://acknowledgments.alliancefound.org. U10CA180820 (ECOG-ACRIN); U10CA180868 (NRG); U10CA180888 (SWOG); Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT05673148 Clinical trial information: NCT05673148 .

AbstractINTRODUCTIONPremenopausal bilateral oophorectomy (PBO) is associated with later‐life cognition, but the underlying brain changes remain unclear. We assessed the impact of PBO and PBO age on white matter integrity.METHODSFemale participants with regional diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) metrics of fractional anisotropy (FA) and mean diffusivity (MD) were included (22 with PBO < 40 years; 43 with PBO 40‐45 years; 39 with PBO 46‐49 years; 907 referents without PBO < 50 years). Linear regression models adjusted for age and apolipoprotein E (APOE) genotype.RESULTSFemales with PBO < 40 years, compared to referents, had lower FA and higher MD in the anterior corona radiata, genu of the corpus collosum, inferior fronto‐occipital fasciculus, superior occipital, and superior temporal white matter. Females who underwent PBO between 45 and 49 also had some changes in white matter integrity.DISCUSSIONFemales who underwent PBO < 40 years had reduced white matter integrity across multiple regions in later‐life. These results are important for females considering PBO for noncancerous conditions.Highlights Females with premenopausal bilateral oophorectomy (PBO) < 40 years had lower FA versus referents. Females with PBO < 40 years had higher MD in many regions versus referents. Adjusting for estrogen replacement therapy use did not attenuate results. Females with PBO 45‐49 years also had some white matter changes versus referents.

AbstractBackground and ObjectivesThe SARS‐COVID‐19 pandemic significantly limited healthcare access. We sought to evaluate whether California's lockdown in March 2020 affected staging and time to treatment of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). We hypothesized that patients diagnosed after the lockdown would have longer time to treatment and higher stage at presentation.MethodsWe retrospectively identified and categorized 1294 patients presenting to five University of California healthcare systems with a new diagnosis of PDAC into “pre‐lockdown” and “post‐lockdown” groups based on timing of pathologic diagnosis.ResultsIn the 12 months pre‐lockdown, 835 patients were diagnosed with PDAC, and 459 patients in the 6 months post‐lockdown. Demographics, staging, and treatment type were similar between eras. There was a decreased male:female ratio post‐ versus pre‐lockdown (0.97 vs. 1.25; p = 0.03). Time from symptom onset to first treatment was significantly increased among females post‐lockdown (p = 0.001). However, overall time from diagnosis to first treatment was shorter in the post‐lockdown era (median 23 vs. 26 days, p < 0.001).ConclusionsThe COVID‐19 lockdown did not significantly delay initial presentation, diagnosis, or treatment of newly diagnosed PDAC patients. Time from diagnosis to first treatment was shorter post‐lockdown. Reduced healthcare utilization for minor complaints and increased telehealth utilization may have contributed.

Abstract Background Despite advances in cardiovascular (CV) care, African American adults experience worse CV disease (CVD) outcomes than White adults, warranting the investigation of CVD prediction biomarkers. Plasma ceramides are bioactive lipids that are biomarkers of adverse cardiovascular risk for both primary and secondary prevention. However, racial/ethnic differences in ceramide levels and their link to CV health (CVH) in African American adults remain underexplored. Purpose This study aimed to: 1) assess the association between ceramide scores and CVH and atherosclerotic CVD (ASCVD) risk among African American adults and 2) compare ceramide scores between African American and White adults. Methods Health surveys and ceramides measurements were conducted for African American and White adults, both recruited from population-based observational study cohorts. Ten-year pooled cohort risk ASCVD scores were calculated based on American College of Cardiology guidelines. CVH was assessed using Life’s Essential 8 (LE8) scores, as per American Heart Association rubrics. CV risk factors in the two cohorts were compared using Chi-squared tests. Linear regression and Pearson correlation assessed the association between ceramide, LE8, and ASCVD risk scores. Linear regression, adjusted for age and sex, compared ASCVD risk and ceramide scores between the two cohorts. Results In total, 58 African American (mean age [SD] 54.5 [11.9] years, 67.9% women) and 1103 White (mean age [SD] 64.5 [11.9] years, 52.1% women) adults were included (Table 1). Compared to White adults, African American adults had a higher prevalence of overweight/obesity (92.9% vs 33.6%; p&lt;0.001), hypertension (69.6% vs 42.5%; p&lt;0.001), diabetes (30.4% vs 12.2%; p&lt;0.001), and hyperlipidaemia (42.9% vs 30.0%; p=0.03). No difference in mean ASCVD risk was observed between the African American (12.8% [SD 10.4]) and White (12.6% [SD 11.1]) cohorts (p= 0.91). African American adults had lower 18:0 (0.08 [0.03] vs 0.10 [0.04] μmol/L) and 24:1 (0.91 [0.31] vs 1.17 [0.33] μmol/L) ceramides compared to White adults (p&lt;0.001). Ceramide scores among African American adults were not associated with LE8 scores (p=0.077) or ASCVD risk scores (r=-0.12, p=0.428). Adjusting for age and sex, African American adults had lower ceramide scores compared to White adults (mean [SD] 1.90 [1.97] vs 3.48 [2.88], p=0.006). Conclusions In our study comparing African American and White adults in the community, the association observed between ceramide scores and CVH or ASCVD risk scores in the African American cohort did not reach statistical significance. Interestingly, despite a more suboptimal cardiometabolic profile, African American adults had lower ceramide scores compared to White adults. Our findings suggest that ceramide profiles may not accurately reflect cardiovascular risk in African American adults, warranting further exploration of alternative sphingolipid biomarkers of risk for this population.

Abstract Background: Pancreatic cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related death globally. Risk factors for pancreatic cancer include common genetic variants and potentially heavy alcohol consumption. We assessed if genetic variants modify the association between heavy alcohol consumption and pancreatic cancer risk. Methods: We conducted a genome-wide interaction analysis of single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) by heavy alcohol consumption (more than three drinks per day) for pancreatic cancer in European ancestry populations from genome-wide association studies. Our analysis included 3,707 cases and 4,167 controls from case–control studies and 1,098 cases and 1,162 controls from cohort studies. Fixed-effect meta-analyses were conducted. Results: A potential novel region of association on 10p11.22, lead SNP rs7898449 (interaction P value (Pinteraction) = 5.1 × 10−8 in the meta-analysis; Pinteraction = 2.1 × 10−9 in the case–control studies; Pinteraction = 0.91 in the cohort studies), was identified. An SNP correlated with this lead SNP is an expression quantitative trait locus for the neuropilin 1 gene. Of the 17 genomic regions with genome-wide significant evidence of association with pancreatic cancer in prior studies, we observed suggestive evidence that heavy alcohol consumption modified the association for one SNP near LINC00673, rs11655237 on 17q25.1 (Pinteraction = 0.004). Conclusions: We identified a novel genomic region that may be associated with pancreatic cancer risk in conjunction with heavy alcohol consumption located near an expression quantitative trait locus for neuropilin 1, a protein that plays an important role in the development and progression of pancreatic cancer. Impact: This work can provide insights into the etiology of pancreatic cancer, particularly in heavy drinkers.

Objectives: To evaluate the relationship between Framingham Stroke Risk Profile (FSRP) score and rate of white matter hyperintensity (WMH) progression and cognition. Methods: Consecutive patients enrolled in the Mayo Clinic Florida Familial Cerebrovascular Diseases Registry (2011-2020) with 2 brain-MRI scans at least 1 year apart were included. The primary outcome was annual change in WMH volume (cm3/year) stratified as fast versus slow (above vs. below median). Cognition was assessed using a Mini-Mental State Exam (MMSE, 0-30). FSRP score (0 to 8) was calculated by summing the presence of age 65 years or older, smoking, systolic blood pressure greater than 130 mmHg, diabetes, coronary disease, atrial fibrillation, left ventricular hypertrophy, and antihypertensive medication use. Linear and logistic regression analyses were performed to examine the association between FSRP and WMH progression, and cognition. Results: In all, 207 patients were included, with a mean age of 60±16 y and 54.6% female. FSRP scores risk distribution was: 31.9% scored 0 to 1, 36.7% scored 2 to 3, and 31.4% scored ≥4. The baseline WMH volume was 9.6 cm3 (IQR: 3.3-28.4 cm3), and the annual rate of WMH progression was 0.9 cm3/year (IQR: 0.1 to 3.1 cm3/year). A higher FSRP score was associated with fast WMH progression (odds ratio, 1.45; 95% CI: 1.22-1.72; P<0.001) and a lower MMSE score (23.6 vs. 27.1; P<0.001). There was a dose-dependent relationship between higher FSRP score and fast WMH progression (odds ratios, 2.20, 4.64, 7.86, 8.03 for FSRP scores 1, 2, 3, and ≥4, respectively; trend P<0.001). Conclusions: This study demonstrated an association between higher FSRP scores and accelerated WMH progression, as well as lower cognition.