Citations

Abstract Purpose: The relevance of inherited pathogenic variants in cancer predisposition genes to pancreatic cancer (PC) is not well understood. Several small studies have identified pathogenic variants in 4% to 14% of unselected PC patients using multigene panels of predisposition genes, but only BRCA2, ATM, and PALB2 have been clearly implicated in this disease. We aimed to assess the clinical and molecular characteristics of PC patients referred for hereditary cancer genetic testing, and to estimate the risk of PC associated with pathogenic variants in panel-based cancer predisposition genes. Methods: PC patients (n=1,819) were ascertained from a large cohort of over 140,000 patients undergoing multigene panel testing (MGPT) of predisposition genes between March 2012 and June 2016 at a single diagnostic laboratory. Clinical histories and molecular results were reviewed and summarized. Gene-level variant frequencies among PC cases were compared to those from the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC) to calculate gene-specific pancreatic cancer risk ratios. Results: PC patients were predominantly Caucasian (76.5%) and female (58.9%), with a median age at diagnosis of 61 years (51.7). Of these, 33.5% reported additional cancer primaries, and 44.8% reported a family history of PC. Overall, 15.4% of PC patients were found to have at least one pathogenic/likely pathogenic variant in panel-based predisposition genes. Genes with the highest frequencies of pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants included BRCA2 (3.9%), ATM (3.6%), CHEK2 (excluding p.Ile157Thr) (2.0%), PALB2 (1.5%), VHL (1.4%), CDKN2A (1.2%), BRCA1 (0.8%), and MSH6 (0.8%). 21.8% of BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers did not meet BRCA1/2 testing criteria and 61.5% of MSH6 carriers did not meet Lynch syndrome testing criteria. No CDKN2A families met diagnostic criteria for familial atypical multiple mole melanoma syndrome, and 44% did not report any personal or family history of melanoma. To estimate associations between pathogenic variants and pancreatic cancer, Caucasian PC cases were compared to non-Finnish European, non-TCGA ExAC reference controls. Pathogenic variants in ATM, BRCA2, CDKN2A, MSH6, and PALB2 were significantly associated with high PC risks. Pathogenic variants in BRCA1 were associated with a moderate risk of PC (RR=2.7). Conclusions: These findings shed light on the spectrum of mutations that can be expected for PC patients referred for cancer predisposition testing. The results confirm the associations of CDKN2A and BRCA2 variants with PC, and expand on the phenotypic spectrum associated with these variants. Furthermore, these results suggest that ATM, PALB2, and MSH6 may be high-risk PC genes, warranting further investigation in case-control and family-based studies. Citation Format: Holly LaDuca, Chunling Hu, Hermela Shimelis, Eric Polley, Jenna Lilyquist, Mary Helen Black, Brigette Tippin Davis, David E. Goldgar, Jill Dolinsky, Fergus J. Couch. What have we learned from pancreatic cancer patients undergoing multigene panel testing [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2017; 2017 Apr 1-5; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 4286. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-4286

Abstract A better understanding of gene-specific risks for development of breast cancer will lead to improved screening, prevention, and therapeutic strategies for individuals identified to carry germline mutations. We performed targeted massively-parallel sequencing to identify mutations and large genomic rearrangements in 26 known or proposed breast cancer susceptibility genes in 2134 BRCA-negative women with familial breast cancer (FBC). A case-control analysis was performed comparing the frequency of internally classified mutations identified in FBC cases to that in non-Finnish European controls from the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC) excluding samples from The Cancer Genome Atlas. Including large genomic rearrangements, mutations were identified in 8.2% of FBC cases compared to 6.2% of ExAC controls, including mutations in high-penetrance genes (0.6% in cases vs. 0.1% in controls), moderate-penetrance genes (3.7% vs 1.7%), and seven cases with two mutations (0.3%). The remainder of FBC cases and ExAC controls had mutations in proposed breast cancer genes (1.6% of cases vs 2.4% of controls), Lynch syndrome genes (0.5% vs. 0.5%) or were heterozygous MUTYH carriers (1.5% vs. 1.5%). Case-control analysis demonstrated significant associations with FBC for ATM, PALB2, and TP53 mutations (OR>3.0, p<10-4), BARD1 mutations (OR=3.2, p=0.012), and CHEK2 truncating mutations (OR=1.6, p=0.041). Our results therefore demonstrate that only approximately 4% of BRCA1/2 negative FBC patients have mutations in genes definitively associated with breast cancer at this time. Large case-control studies are needed to fully evaluate the breast cancer risks associated with moderate penetrance and proposed breast cancer susceptibility genes. Citation Format: Kara N. Maxwell, Thomas Paul Slavin, Jenna M. Lilyquist, Joseph Vijai, Susan L. Neuhausen, Steven N. Hart, Vignesh Ravichandran, Tinu Thomas, Ann Maria, Kasmintan A. Schrader, Raymond Moore, Chunling Hu, Brad Wubbenhorst, Brandon M. Wenz, Kurt D'Andrea, Susan M. Domchek, Mark E. Robson, Paulo Peterlongo, Paolo Radice, James M. Ford, Judy E. Garber, Csilla Szabo, Kenneth Offit, Katherine L. Nathanson, Fergus J. Couch, Jeffrey N. Weitzel. Risks of familial breast cancer associated with known and proposed breast cancer susceptibility genes [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2017; 2017 Apr 1-5; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 4265. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-4265

Abstract While the population-based risk for breast cancer in males remains relatively low (1:1000), inherited predisposition can significantly raise this to as high as 10%, in men who carry a mutation in the BRCA2 gene. Lifetime breast cancer risks of 1-2% have also been reported in men who carry a mutation in BRCA1. These risks, as well as elevated risks of prostate, pancreatic, and melanoma cancers, are important to discuss in families diagnosed with Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Syndrome, which is often viewed as being clinically relevant only to the women in an affected family. However, beyond the BRCA1/2 genes, limited data is available on hereditary predisposition to male breast cancer. We analyzed clinical histories and molecular results from multi-gene panel testing for hereditary cancer predisposition in a cohort of 715 men affected by breast cancer. A total of 708 male breast cancer patients were eligible for inclusion in the final analysis. Molecular testing included analysis of 5 to 59 genes for DNA coding sequence and copy number variants by next-generation sequencing and microarray. Genetic variants identified were classified according to a 5-tier system using previously validated algorithms1,2. Only those variants classified as pathogenic or likely pathogenic were included in the analyses as positive for a mutation. Overall, a mutation was detected in 18% of these men. Four subjects carried a mutation in two different breast cancer predisposition genes. BRCA2 and CHEK2 were the most frequently mutated genes. The risk of breast cancer was significantly elevated compared to public controls in individuals with a mutation in BRCA2 (odds ratio (OR)=13.9; p=1.92x10-16), CHEK2 (OR=3.8; p=6.24x10-24) and PALB2 (OR=6.6, p=0.01). Average age was similar amongst men with (63.5±2.7 years) and without (62.3±1.2 years) mutations, as were clinical and family histories of additional cancers. The high overall diagnostic yield suggests the utility of testing all male breast cancer patient regardless of age or family history by multigene panel testing, and provides data to support risk-based counseling and medical recommendations for screening and/or prevention in male mutation carriers. 1. 1. LaDuca et al. Genet Med. 2014 Nov;16(11):830-7 2. 2. Richards et al. Genet Med. 2015 May;17(5):405-24 Citation Format: Elizabeth C. Chao, Mary Pritzlaff, Summerour Pia, Rachel McFarland, Shuwei Li, Jill Dolinsky, David Goldgar, Hermela Shimelis, Fergus Couch, LaDuca Holly. Hereditary risks of male breast cancer in a multi-gene panel testing cohort [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2017; 2017 Apr 1-5; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 3406. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-3406

Abstract Familial studies were among the first to indicate that breast cancer prognosis has a heritable component. Subsequently many variants associated with prognosis have been identified using a range of techniques including genome-wide association studies (GWAs). Despite these advances, much of the heritability remains unexplained. In young women, breast cancer is characterised by a higher incidence of adverse pathological features, unique tumour gene expression profiles and worse survival. In addition, the association of risk with conventional epidemiological exposures is less clear in women with early onset. We hypothesise that some of these difference between early and late onset could be influenced by germline variation. To identify additional variants that influence breast cancer prognosis we conducted a two stage meta-analysis of four GWAs consisting of 6,042 patients from the UK (POSH), Finland (HEBCS), Germany (SUCCESS-A) and Australia (ABCFS). Cox-regression analyses were used to investigate overall survival (OS, n=1,101 events) and disease-free survival (DFS, n=1,316 events) with correction for oestrogen status (ER). These survival analyses were repeated in a subset of patients with early onset (aged ≤40 at diagnosis, n=2,315 patients, OS n=604 events, DFS n=716 events). Meta-analysis identified two intronic SNPs in ADAMTSL1 that were associated exclusively with early onset DFS, rs715212 (Pmeta=3.54x10-5) and rs10963755 (Pmeta=3.91x10-4) without heterogeneity between cohorts. Multivariable Cox-regression demonstrated that the effect of these SNPs were independent of the classical prognostic factors. Most importantly, rs715212 reached genome-wide significance (Pmultivariate=5.37x10-8) in the multivariate model. ADAMTSL1 encodes a glycoprotein that forms part of the extracellular matrix (ECM) and may function in cell-cell or cell-matrix interactions or may regulate other ADAMTS proteases. Previous studies have shown that ADAMTSL1 is hypermethylated in ER positive breast cancer tumours. Using GTEx to perform eQTL analysis, we found that rs715212 is associated with the expression of several biologically relevant genes AREG (P=0.035), TNF (P=0.015), FASLG (P=0.0031) and EGF (P=0.0018) in breast mammary tissue. Interestingly, separate studies have shown that AREG is overexpressed in ER-positive breast tumours from pre-menopausal women versus post-menopausal women. Furthermore, AREG is differentially expressed between parous and non-parous mammary glands and is persistently downregulated by parity, which suggests it may contribute to the susceptibility of the nulliparous gland to breast cancer. We conclude that rs715212 is associated with an increased risk of disease progression in patients with early onset and speculate that this could be due to an interaction with the expression of AREG. Note: This abstract was not presented at the meeting. Citation Format: Latha Kadalayil, Sofia Khan, Heli Nevanlinna, Peter A. Fasching, Fergus J. Couch, John Hopper, Jianjun Liu, Tom Maishman, Lorraine Durcan, Carl Bloomqvist, Andy Collins, Dianna Eccles, William Tapper. A meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies identifies novel loci that influence breast cancer prognosis [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2017; 2017 Apr 1-5; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 1322. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-1322

Abstract Genome Wide Association Studies (GWAS) are designed to identify single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) mapping to genomic regions associated with a particular trait or disease. Currently, 19 genomic loci associated with risk for estrogen receptor negative breast cancer have been identified. However, for most of these loci the mechanisms driving susceptibility have remained elusive. The 2p23.2 locus, defined by SNP rs67073037 (p = 4.76 x 10-9), contains 79 SNPs exhibiting genome-wide significant associations as well as four candidate genes: SPDYA, TRMT61B, WDR43, and FAM179A. Post-GWAS functional analysis revealed two candidate causal regulatory elements: an enhancer-like element defined by SNP rs44017214 located in the first intron of the WDR43 gene; and a segment in the 3’-UTR region of WDR43 defined by SNPs rs11680458 and rs11331880 which are predicted to have allele specific binding of non-coding microRNAs miR-548 and miR-376, respectively. We validated allele specific transcription factor binding to rs44017214 using competitive binding of USF1/USF2 to the risk allele in both MCF10A and CAL51 cell lines in Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assays (EMSA). Additionally, rs44017214 was removed using CRISPR-cas9, and expression of neighboring genes was evaluated by qRT-PCR. No change in expression was found for any gene in a 2 Mb region surrounding the SNP, with the exception of PLB1. This suggests that the enhancer element in the intron of WDR43 has PLB1 as its target. To assess the miRNA binding site impact on WDR43 expression the pMIR-REPORT Luciferase allele-specific vector was co-transfected with miR-141/200, miR548, or miR-376 in MCF10A cells. The rs1131880 allele C in the WDR43 3’-UTR lead to the suppression of luciferase expression by miR-376 compared to the G allele. This study reveals two independent regulatory mechanisms within the 2p23.2 locus; (i) modulation of enhancer activity by allele specific binding of transcription factors USF1/USF2 to rs4401714, and (ii) decreasing the expression of WDR43 through the formation of a miR-376 binding site at the 3’-UTR of the WDR43 gene. Elucidating the functional significance of these common variants in the novel susceptibility loci 2p23.2 furthers our knowledge of the etiology of estrogen receptor negative breast cancer. Citation Format: Carly M. Harro, Gustavo Mendoza-Fandino, Nicholas T. Woods, Xueli Li, Fergus J. Couch, Alvaro N. Monteiro. Two distinct regulatory mechanisms underlie estrogen receptor negative breast cancer susceptibility at the 2p23.2 locus [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2017; 2017 Apr 1-5; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 1306. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-1306

Abstract Germline pathogenic variants in BRCA1 and BRCA2 account for 10% of ovarian cancer (OC), including ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal carcinomas. Pathogenic variants in BRIP1, RAD51C, RAD51D, and other cancer predisposition genes have been observed in another 2% to 5% of OCs. However, the specific genes associated with OC and estimates of risk associated with pathogenic variants in the individual genes are not well defined. We sought to determine the relevance of multigene panel testing results for OC cases. The study was focused on 140,449 individuals, including 10,233 OC cases, receiving clinical panel testing of cancer predisposition genes. Standardized relative risks (SRR) for pathogenic variants in 18 cancer predisposition genes were estimated using reference controls from the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC). The median (range) age at diagnosis of OC was 57 (21-90) years. OC cases were 76.2% Caucasian, 3.6% African American, 4.6% Asian, 4.7% Hispanic, and 10.9% unknown/other. Among the 10,233 OC cases, 1391 (13.6%) had pathogenic mutations, including 1032 pathogenic mutations among the 7793 Caucasian OC cases (13.2%). Using the non-Finnish European ExAC (excluding TCGA samples) reference controls, the allele frequency for all pathogenic variants in each gene was summed and compared to the frequency of mutations in the Caucasian OC cases. Pathogenic variants in the known OC predisposition genes: BRCA1, BRCA2, BRIP1, MSH2, MSH6, RAD51C, and RAD51D were associated with a high risk of OC (SRR>4.0). Additionally, significant associations were observed for pathogenic variants in suspected OC risk genes ATM and PALB2 (SRR=2.06 and 2.78, respectively). This study identified several genes routinely screened on multigene panel testing that confer high or moderate risks of OC. Associations with known OC predisposition genes were confirmed. In addition, this study provides evidence that PALB2 is a moderate risk OC gene, and that ATM may confer lower to moderate risks of OC. If confirmed in future studies, these risks should be carefully considered in future screening and management of OC patients. In contrast, BARD1 and genes in the MRN complex were not associated with clinically relevant risks of OC. Citation Format: Jenna Lilyquist, Holly LaDuca, Eric Polley, Hermela Shimelis, Chunling Hu, Raymond Moore, Steven N. Hart, Fergus J. Couch, Jill Dolinsky, David E. Goldgar. Multigene panel testing and risk estimates in 10,233 ovarian cancer cases [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2017; 2017 Apr 1-5; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 1287. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-1287

Investigating the most likely causal variants identified by fine‐mapping analyses may improve the power to detect gene–environment interactions. We assessed the interplay between 70 single nucleotide polymorphisms identified by genetic fine‐scale mapping of susceptibility loci and 11 epidemiological breast cancer risk factors in relation to breast cancer. Analyses were conducted on up to 58,573 subjects (26,968 cases and 31,605 controls) from the Breast Cancer Association Consortium, in one of the largest studies of its kind. Analyses were carried out separately for estrogen receptor (ER) positive (ER+) and ER negative (ER–) disease. The Bayesian False Discovery Probability (BFDP) was computed to assess the noteworthiness of the results. Four potential gene–environment interactions were identified as noteworthy (BFDP < 0.80) when assuming a true prior interaction probability of 0.01. The strongest interaction result in relation to overall breast cancer risk was found between CFLAR‐rs7558475 and current smoking (ORint = 0.77, 95% CI: 0.67–0.88, pint = 1.8 × 10−4). The interaction with the strongest statistical evidence was found between 5q14‐rs7707921 and alcohol consumption (ORint =1.36, 95% CI: 1.16–1.59, pint = 1.9 × 10−5) in relation to ER– disease risk. The remaining two gene–environment interactions were also identified in relation to ER– breast cancer risk and were found between 3p21‐rs6796502 and age at menarche (ORint = 1.26, 95% CI: 1.12–1.43, pint =1.8 × 10−4) and between 8q23‐rs13267382 and age at first full‐term pregnancy (ORint = 0.89, 95% CI: 0.83–0.95, pint = 5.2 × 10−4). While these results do not suggest any strong gene–environment interactions, our results may still be useful to inform experimental studies. These may in turn, shed light on the potential interactions observed.

Background We previously showed that the BRCA1 variant c.5096G>A p.Arg1699Gln (R1699Q) was associated with an intermediate risk of breast cancer (BC) and ovarian cancer (OC). This study aimed to assess these cancer risks for R1699Q carriers in a larger cohort, including follow-up of previously studied families, to further define cancer risks and to propose adjusted clinical management of female BRCA1*R1699Q carriers. Methods Data were collected from 129 BRCA1*R1699Q families ascertained internationally by ENIGMA (Evidence-based Network for the Interpretation of Germline Mutant Alleles) consortium members. A modified segregation analysis was used to calculate BC and OC risks. Relative risks were calculated under both monogenic model and major gene plus polygenic model assumptions. Results In this cohort the cumulative risk of BC and OC by age 70 years was 20% and 6%, respectively. The relative risk for developing cancer was higher when using a model that included the effects of both the R1699Q variant and a residual polygenic component compared with monogenic model (for BC 3.67 vs 2.83, and for OC 6.41 vs 5.83). Conclusion Our results confirm that BRCA1*R1699Q confers an intermediate risk for BC and OC. Breast surveillance for female carriers based on mammogram annually from age 40 is advised. Bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy should be considered based on family history.