Citations

Abstract Reprogramming of aged donor tissue cells into induced pluripotent stem cells (A-iPSC) preserved the epigenetic memory of aged-donor tissue, defined as genomic instability and poor tissue differentiation in our previous study. The unbalanced expression of RNA exosome subunits affects the RNA degradation complex function and is associated with geriatric diseases including premature aging and cancer progression. We hypothesized that the age-dependent progressive subtle dysregulation of EXOSC2 (exosome component 2) causes the aging traits (abnormal cell cycle and poor tissue differentiation). We used embryonic stem cells as a tool to study EXOSC2 function as the aging trait epigenetic memory determined in A-iPSC because these aging traits could not be studied in senesced aged cells or immortalized cancer cells. We found that the regulatory subunit of PP2A phosphatase, PPP2R5E, is a key target of EXOSC2 and this regulation is preserved in stem cells and cancer.

Abstract Background: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is associated with obesity and cardiovascular risk. Results from the SURMOUNT-OSA studies demonstrated significant reduction of a number of cardiometabolic risk measures in participants with OSA and obesity following treatment with tirzepatide. Objectives: Systematically analyze all tirzepatide treatment related changes of cardiometabolic risk measures in SURMOUNT-OSA studies and investigate to what extent these changes were mediated by reductions in weight and/or OSA-related measures. Methods: The SURMOUNT-OSA master protocol comprised two 52-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled Phase 3 studies. Study 1 (N=234) and 2 (N=235) included participants with moderate-to-severe OSA and obesity, who at screening reported not using, or using positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy, respectively. The design and rationale of the studies have been published previously (1). The current analysis investigated the association of treatment with tirzepatide or placebo with SURMOUNT-OSA pre-specified cardiometabolic risk measures including blood pressure, and levels of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP), HDL-C, non-HDL-C, triglycerides, fasting insulin. Further analyses included change in HOMA-IR with tirzepatide compared to placebo, and mediation analysis to determine the proportion of observed changes attributable to reductions in body weight, apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) and sleep apnea-specific hypoxic burden (SASHB). Results: In Study 1, participants experienced greater difference in change from baseline with tirzepatide compared to placebo in SBP (-7.9 mmHg; 95% CI -11.0 to -4.9; p<0.001), and DBP (-3.2 mmHg; 95% CI -5.4 to -1.0; p=0.005) at 48 weeks, and hsCRP (-28.9±8.2%; p=0.003), HDL-C (7.2±2.1%; p<0.001), non-HDL-C (-13.0±3.1%; p<0.001), triglycerides (-32.2±3.7%; p<0.001), fasting insulin (-41.4±5.0%; p<0.001), and HOMA-IR (-48.0±4.9%; p<0.001) at 52 weeks. In Study 2, participants experienced greater differences in change from baseline following tirzepatide compared to placebo in SBP (-4.3 mmHg; 95% CI -7.3 to -1.2; p=0.007) at 48 weeks, and hsCRP (-45.1±8.0%; p<0.001), HDL-C (10.0±2.8%; p<0.001), non-HDL-C (-14.3±2.5%; p<0.001), triglycerides (-31.5±3.7%; p<0.001), fasting insulin (-45.4±5.4%; p<0.001), and HOMA-IR (-54.8±5.0%; p<0.001) at 52 weeks. Statistically significant independent mediation effect of changes in OSA metrics was observed on hsCRP, HOMA-IR and triglycerides. In addition, the combination of changes in weight and OSA metrics, but not weight or OSA improvements alone, had a significant mediation effect on non-HDL-C. There was no significant mediation effect of weight or OSA metrics observed on DBP. Conclusions: In the SURMOUNT-OSA program trials, tirzepatide appeared to have significant cardiometabolic benefits for patients with moderate-to-severe OSA and obesity. Based on the mediation analysis, treating both sleep-disordered breathing and obesity is likely required to optimize cardiometabolic benefits for patients with OSA and obesity.

Background: Cognitive change is an important factor in understanding dementia. Estimating effects of exposures on cognitive change requires choosing an analytical timescale, typically time on study or current age. There is limited consensus regarding timescale choice in epidemiologic cognitive aging research. Methods: Using a coordinated analytic approach in 10 cohorts of older adults, we evaluated whether estimated effects of two exposures on memory change differed depending on timescale (time on study or current age). We modeled effects of apolipoprotein-E (APOE) ε4 genotype (a time-invariant exposure) and diabetes (a potentially time-varying/acquired exposure evaluated at baseline) using mixed-effects models with linear and nonlinear time specifications for both timescales. Results: Among APOE ε4 carriers, model-estimated memory scores at baseline (time on study timescale) or at each cohort’s median baseline age (current age timescale) were lower, and the average rate of decline was faster than among APOE ε4 noncarriers. Model-estimated memory scores at baseline or at median baseline age were generally similar across baseline diabetes status, with variability across cohorts in the diabetes-memory change association. In some cohorts, trends in diabetes-memory change associations differed in direction across timescales. Conclusions: Timescale was largely inconsequential for estimated effects of APOE genotype, but yielded differences in estimated diabetes effects, raising questions about the appropriate scale. The current age scale may be problematic because diabetes was measured heterogeneously in age across individuals, a common issue in aging cohorts. Our work demonstrates approaches to evaluate alternative timescales, including in multicohort analyses, and highlights potential implications for estimated exposure effects on cognitive change.

Importance Anemia is a common complication of surgery and acute illness that is associated with adverse clinical outcomes. The role of anemia prevention and treatment strategies in this setting remains unclear. Objective To evaluate the effect of a multifaceted anemia management bundle vs standard care on posthospitalization hemoglobin recovery and multidimensional functional outcomes in survivors of acute illness. Design, Setting, and Participants This parallel group randomized clinical trial, known as the Practical Anemia Bundle for Sustained Blood Recovery, was conducted at postsurgical and medical intensive care units at a large US medical center. Critically ill patients (aged ≥18 years) with moderate to severe anemia (hemoglobin concentration &amp;lt;10 g/dL) were enrolled between March 2022 and November 2023. Participants were randomly assigned 1:1 to the intervention or standard care group. Intention-to-treat analyses were performed between July 2024 and January 2025. Intervention The intervention bundle was delivered throughout the duration of hospitalization and included optimized phlebotomy practices, clinical decision support, and pharmacological anemia treatment with intravenous iron. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was the mean difference in hemoglobin concentration at 1 month after hospital discharge. Results A total of 100 patients (median [IQR] age, 68 [61-72] years; 57 men [57.0%]; 65 [65.0%] with postsurgical admission to the intensive care unit) were enrolled during acute illness. Forty-nine patients (49.0%) were assigned to receive the intervention, and 51 (51.0%) were assigned to receive standard care. Hemoglobin concentration at 1 month after discharge was greater in patients receiving the intervention vs standard care (median [IQR], 12.2 [11.8-13.0] g/dL vs 11.5 [10.2-12.6] g/dL; adjusted mean difference, 0.69 [95% CI, 0.13-1.20] g/dL; P = .02). Conclusions and Relevance This randomized clinical trial found that a multifaceted anemia prevention and treatment bundle was feasible, was well tolerated, and improved posthospitalization hemoglobin concentrations up to 3 months in critically ill adults. These findings can inform the design of future trials. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05167734

Abstract Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) is potentially curative for older adults with hematologic malignancies. Concerns on nonrelapse mortality (NRM) in older adults limit allo-HCT utilization. We executed a prospective, observational study BMT-CTN 1704 (Blood and Marrow Transplant Clinical Trials Network) enrolling allo-HCT recipients aged ≥60 years from 49 centers in the United States. We analyzed associations between 13 measurements of older adult health and NRM within 1 year to construct a comprehensive health assessment risk model (primary-CHARM) using multivariate Fine-Gray model and grouped penalized variable selection. Two machine learning (ML) models (Cox and pseudo-value boosting) were also explored. Models’ performances were compared using area under the curve (AUC), with bootstrap and cross-validation sampling to correct for optimism, decision curve analysis (DCA), calibration, and Brier scores. Among 1105 patients with median age of 67 (range, 60-82) years who received allo-HCT, NRM was 14.4% and overall survival (OS) 71.7% at 1 year. Factors statistically selected for inclusion in primary-CHARM were higher comorbidity burden, lower albumin, higher C-reactive protein, older age, higher weight-loss percentage, lower patient-reported performance score, and cognitive impairment. Primary-CHARM scores were independently associated with higher NRM (hazard ratio [HR], 2.72; P &lt; .0001) and worse OS (HR, 2.09; P &lt; .0001). Bootstrap bias–corrected AUC for primary-CHARM was 0.591. Comparing primary-CHARM with HCT-comorbidity index and 2 ML-CHARM models, calibration, Brier score, and DCA analysis favored primary-CHARM. Primary-CHARM, with mostly simple and readily available parameters, risk stratifies older adults for allo-HCT. Adopting primary-CHARM in practice may promote broader use of HCT by quantifying risk and enhance the design of strategies to improve outcomes. This trial was registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov as #NCT03992352.

Erdheim–Chester disease (ECD) is a rare non-Langerhans cell histiocytosis characterised by multiorgan pathological histiocytic infiltration. Cardiac involvement occurs in 40–75% of patients and increases mortality. A 55-year-old woman with chest pain and dyspnoea was found to have an interatrial septal mass and aortitis suspicious for ECD without other organ involvement. After two inadequate transcatheter interatrial biopsies were obtained using ultrasound guidance alone, diagnostic samples were successfully obtained using intraprocedural frozen section examination. The patient started genotype-targeted treatment with good response. Biopsy confirmation of ECD is required to guide treatment; however, cardiac biopsies are uncommonly performed when other organs are affected. Our unique case of isolated cardiovascular involvement highlights how frozen sectioning with multimodal intraprocedural imaging guidance can improve diagnostic yield of endomyocardial biopsies. It also highlights how diagnosis of rare conditions requires careful multidisciplinary evaluation of affected organs, procedural risk and diagnostic yield. The use of frozen sectioning can improve diagnostic yield of endomyocardial biopsies.