Citations

BACKGROUNDThere are limited therapeutic options for treatment‐refractory pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), with a paucity of data to support the best option after progression on gemcitabine‐based regimens. The authors performed a meta‐analysis to determine the effectiveness of adding oxaliplatin (OX) or various irinotecan formulations to a fluoropyrimidine (FP) after first‐line treatment progression in patients with PDAC.METHODSDifferent databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane, were searched to identify randomized controlled trials comparing FP monotherapy versus FP combination therapy that included either oxaliplatin (FPOX) or various irinotecan formulations (FPIRI) in patients with PDAC who progressed after first‐line treatment. Secondary analyses were planned to assess the effectiveness of FPOX and FPIRI compared with FP. Outcomes of interest included overall survival (OS) and progression‐free survival (PFS).RESULTSFive studies with 895 patients were identified. Patients randomized to receive FPIRI/FPOX had a significantly improved PFS and a trend toward improved OS compared with those who received FP monotherapy. When comparing FPIRI with FP, there was an improvement in both PFS (hazard ratio, 0.64; 95% confidence interval, 0.47‐0.87; P = .005) and OS (hazard ratio, 0.70; 95% confidence interval, 0.55‐0.89; P = .004) in patients who received the combination. Conversely, FPOX produced only a modest improvement in PFS with no improvement in OS.CONCLUSIONSCombination chemotherapy with OX or various IRI formulations appears to improve PFS compared with single‐agent FP. FPIRI, but not FPOX, appears to confer an OS advantage. The combination of FP with irinotecan formulations appears to be the appropriate next line of treatment upon progression after gemcitabine‐based chemotherapy regimens. Cancer 2017;123:4680‐4686. © 2017 American Cancer Society.

Abstract Background: Dysregulation of fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) signaling by FGFR translocations and activating mutations is implicated in many cancers, including CCA. FGFR2 translocations are the most common FGFR alterations, which occur in ~13% of pts with intrahepatic CCA and involve a variety of fusion partners/breakpoints. INCB054828 is a novel, orally available, selective inhibitor of FGFR1, FGFR2, and FGFR3 tyrosine kinase activities (AACR 2015; Abstract 771). Methods: This phase 2, open-label trial will evaluate INCB054828 monotherapy in pts with advanced/metastatic or surgically unresectable CCA (Table; NCT02924376). Pts will be prescreened centrally for FGF/FGFR status and enrolled in the following cohorts prior to start of treatment: FGFR2 translocations (Cohort A); other FGF/FGFR alterations (Cohort B); no FGF/FGFR alterations (Cohort C; negative control for effects of FGF/FGFR alterations on objective response rate [ORR]). Pts must be aged ≥18 years, with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≤2, disease progression after ≥1 prior systemic therapy, and no prior use of selective FGFR inhibitors. Pts will self-administer INCB054828 orally at a starting dose of 13.5 mg once-daily on a 21-day cycle (2 weeks on; 1 week off); treatment will continue until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint will be ORR (complete or partial response per independent radiologic review committee using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors v1.1) in pts with FGFR2 translocations (Cohort A). Secondary endpoints will include ORR in pts positive or negative for any FGF/FGFR alterations and duration of response, progression-free survival, overall survival, and safety (all cohorts). The study is currently open for enrollment (estimated primary completion date, April, 2018). Study DesignPrescreen for FGF/FGFR Status• Adults with metastatic/surgically unresectable cholangiocarcinoma with disease progression after ≥1 previous systemic treatment- FGFR2 translocations → cohort A (n~60)- Other FGF/FGFR alterations → cohort B (n~20)- No FGF/FGFR alterations → cohort C (n~20)Screen for eligibility criteria and patient characteristics• Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≤2• Adequate hepatic function (total bilirubin ≤1.5 × upper limit of normal [ULN; ≤2.5 × ULN for Gilbert syndrome or disease involving liver]; aminotransferases <2.5 × ULN [<5 × ULN with liver metastases])• Adequate renal function (creatinine clearance ≥30 mL/min; serum phosphate >institutional ULN; serum calcium >institutional normal range; potassium >institutional lower limit of normal)• Life expectancy ≥12 weeksEnroll and initiate INCB054828 treatment• Oral once daily dosing: 21-day (2-weeks-on/1-week-off) cycleStart response assessment after cycle 2• Stable disease/partial or complete response → continue treatment with restaging after cycle 4; imaging assessments increase to every 3 cycles after cycle 4• Disease progression → discontinue treatment; safety and survival follow-up Citation Format: Mitesh J. Borad, S. Lindsey Davis, Maeve A. Lowery, Ekaterine Asatiani, Christine F. Lihou, Huiling Zhen, Ghassan K. Abou-Alfa. Phase 2, open-label, multicenter study of the efficacy and safety of INCB054828 in patients (pts) with advanced, metastatic, or surgically unresectable cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) with inadequate response to prior therapy [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2017; 2017 Apr 1-5; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(13 Suppl):Abstract nr CT063. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-CT063

TPS511 Background: Despite decades of basic and clinical research, effective therapy for the treatment of patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains one of the greatest unmet clinical needs in oncology today. Albumin-bound paclitaxel (AP) and gemcitabine (G) reported on an improvement in overall survival in metastatic (m) PDAC [NEJM 2013; 369:1691-1703]. The addition of cisplatin (C) has shown promising clinical data in previously reported studies [Cancer Res 2015; 75(15 Suppl):Abstract nr LB-003]. Through further preclinical work, vitamin D analog therapy decreases myeloid derived suppressor cell (MDSC) and regulating T cells (Tregs) thus turning PDAC into a more immune friendly microenvironment. This trial combines AP/C/G with the vitamin D analog paricalcitol (P) and the antibody-PD-1 drug Nivolumab (N) as a combination therapy for individuals with previously untreated metastatic PDAC. This trial evaluates the efficacy and safety of NAPPCG in patients in that population (NCT02754726). Methods: Key eligibility criteria include Stage IV PDAC, no prior chemotherapy for systemic disease, KPS ≥ 70; life expectancy ≥ 12 weeks and measurable disease. Key exclusion criteria include prior PD-1 or PD-L1 therapy. Doses are AP 125 mg/m2 undiluted, G 1000 mg/m2 in 500 ml of normal saline (NS), each infused over 30 minutes with C 25mg/ m2 in 500 ml of NS infused over 60 minutes on days 1, 8, 22, and 29 of a 42 day cycle. N is given at a fixed dose of 240 mg as a 60 minute infusion on days 1, 15, and 29. P is given at a fixed dose of 25 µg IV on days 1,4,8,12,15,22,26,29,32,36,and 39. Primary objective is to determine the efficacy of the combination NAPPCG for patients with previously untreated metastatic PDAC through determining CR, ORR, PFS, and OS. The secondary objective is to evaluate the safety of NAPPCG in patients with previously untreated metastatic PDAC. The study initiated accrual in April of 2016. If 4 of the first 10 patients are determined to have a PR the trial will expand to a total of 25 patients. Clinical trial information: NCT02754726.

294 Background: CX-4945 is a first-in-class casein kinase-2 (CK2) threonine kinase small molecule inhibitor. CK2 is pleiotropic and regulates key cellular processes such as proliferation and DNA damage repair, and has been shown to enhance efficacy of gemcitabine (G) and cisplatin (C) in cell line and xenograft CCA model systems. A Phase IB study of G+C with CX-4945 was conducted in advanced cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) patients. Methods: A multi-center “3+3” dose escalation study was conducted in advanced CCA patients. Eligible patients had ECOG PS 0-1 and adequate hematologic, hepatic, and renal function. Primary endpoints were maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D). Secondary endpoints included pharmacokinetic (PK) analyses, overall toxicity evaluation and preliminary assessment of efficacy. Routine clinical dosing for G (1000 mg/m2) and C (25 mg/m2), both on days 1 and 8 every 21 days, was used. Dose escalation cohort were CX-4945 given twice daily on days 0,1,2 and 7,8,9 at 200 mg (DL1), 400mg (DL2), 600 mg (DL3), 800 mg (DL4) and 1000 (DL5) mg. NCI CTCAE v4.03 was used for toxicity assessment and RECIST v1.1 for efficacy evaluation. Results: Nineteen patients were enrolled (DL1:n = 3; DL2:n = 4 DL3:n = 3; DL4:n = 4; DL5:n = 5). No dose limiting toxicities were encountered. MTD and RP2D were ascertained to be DL5. No grade 3 or 4 toxicities at prevalence > 10% were encountered and the overall toxicity profile of the combination was reflective of standard G+C toxicity profile. At data cut-off, preliminary efficacy evaluation demonstrated disease control rate (CR+PR+SD) of 64% (PR:32%, SD:32% and CR:0%), along with median progression-free survival (PFS) of 5 months (range 0-14 months). PK analyses showed no evidence of drug-drug interactions between G, C and CX-4945. Conclusions: RP2D for G+C with CX-4945 is DL5 (CX-4945 dosed on days 0,1,2 and 7,8,9 at 1000 mg PO bid with standard G and C dosing). Preliminary clinical efficacy and tolerability of the regimen support planned controlled, randomized Phase 2 evaluation. Clinical trial information: NCT02128282.

We characterized the effect of systemic therapy given after portal vein embolization (PVE) and before hepatectomy on hepatic tumor and functional liver remnant (FLR) volumes. All 76 patients who underwent right PVE from 2002–2016 were retrospectively studied. Etiologies included colorectal cancer (n = 44), hepatocellular carcinoma (n = 17), cholangiocarcinoma (n = 10), and other metastases (n = 5). Imaging before and after PVE was assessed. Chart review revealed systemic therapy administration, SNaPshot genetic profiling, and comorbidities. Nine patients received systemic therapy; 67 did not. Tumor volume increased 28% in patients who did not receive and decreased −24% in patients who did receive systemic therapy (p = 0.026), with no difference in FLR growth (28% vs. 34%; p = 0.645). Among 30 patients with genetic profiling, 15 were wild type and 15 had mutations. Mutations were an independent predictor of tumor growth (p = 0.049), but did not impact FLR growth (32% vs. 28%; p = 0.93). Neither cirrhosis, hepatic steatosis, nor diabetes impacted changes in tumor or FLR volume (p > 0.20). Systemic therapy administered after PVE before hepatic lobectomy had no effect on FLR growth; however, it was associated with decreasing tumor volumes. Continuing systemic therapy until hepatectomy may be warranted, particularly in patients with genetic mutations.

463 Background: The genomic assessment of cancer has been revolutionized by next-generation sequencing and is increasingly being applied in the clinic to guide therapeutic decision-making. Time to reporting of results, specimen quantity, and analyte quality have constrained initial clinical applications to gene panels and whole exome based strategies. Methods: Patients underwent surgical resection, excisional or core biopsies, or bone marrow biopsy. Samples were analyzed by whole genome or exome sequencing and RNA sequencing, bioinformatics analysis, and therapeutic target prioritization by a multi-disciplinary Clinical Genomics Board. All prioritized targets were CLIA validated using Sanger sequencing, RT-qPCR, FISH, or IHC as appropriate. Treatment was delivered using off-label FDA approved drugs, clinical trials, or single patient INDs. Results: We have enrolled 40 patients with advanced, treatment-refractory cancers of whom sequencing data is available on 33. The initial 6 patients were evaluated in a non-CLIA pilot phase and 27 in the CLIA enabled phase. Upon availability of the initial report, identified targets of putative therapeutic relevance were then prioritized by the CGB in 22/27 patients (81%) for subsequent CLIA validation. Eleven patients have been treated with genomically selected therapy with partial response in 3/10 assessed patients. A testicular cancer patient had aberrations in two testes specific genes, a copy number gain in TSSK6 and a novel gene fusion between thyroid hormone receptor associated protein 3 (THRAP3) and Tektin 2 (TEKT2). Additionally, a case of papillary renal cell carcinoma had an amplification of YAP1 and a previously unreported P287T mutation in CCND1, suggesting potential benefit with a CDK4/6 inhibitor. Treatment is ongoing and results will be reported. Conclusions: Integrated whole genome analysis in a CLIA setting is feasible. Integration of SNV, copy number and transcriptional data may allow for selection of putative driver genes to enhance targeted therapy decisions. Barriers for future broader implementation include the need for reduced time from biopsy to report and availability of therapies.

551 Background: Sorafenib inhibits various pro-angiogenesis pathways including PDGFR-B, a factor associated with resistance to anti-VEGF therapy. A previous phase II trial in patients with chemorefractory metastatic CRC demonstrated a 63% disease control rate with a combination of bevacizumab (BEV) and sorafenib. This phase I trial sought to determine the MTD of BEV and sorafenib combined with standard cytotoxic therapy for advanced gastrointestinal (GI) cancers. Methods: Patients with advanced GI malignancies appropriate for irinotecan-based therapy were enrolled (14 with CRC, 3 gastroesophageal). A standard 3 + 3 design was used with 3 escalating sorafenib dose levels (DL): (1) 200 mg po daily, days 3-7, 10-14; (2) 200 mg po twice daily, days 3-6, 10-13; and (3) 200 mg po twice daily, days 3-7, 10-14. FOLFIRI: irinotecan 180 mg/m2 d1, leucovorin 400 mg/m2 d1, 5-fluorouracil (FU) bolus 400 mg/m2 d1, 5-FU infusion 2400 mg/m2d1-2 and BEV 5 mg/kg d1. 1 cycle = 14 days. Results: Seventeen pts were enrolled, median age of 56 (range 32 and 81). Two pts were replaced, as they did not complete DLT evaluation, leaving 15 evaluable pts. Four evaluable pts at DL1 and 6 pts at DL2 had no DLTs. At DL 3, the first cohort of 3 pts did not experience any DLTs. In the second cohort of 3 pts, 2 pts experienced DLTs (asymptomatic G3 hypophosphatemia, G3 dehydration and diarrhea). MTD was determined to be DL2: sorafenib 200 mg PO twice daily, days 3-6, 10-13 combined with FOLFIRI and BEV at standard doses. Of the 15 evaluable pts, 4 pts had PR, 8 pts had SD as best response, 1 pt had PD, and 2 pts discontinued treatment prior to first tumor assessment. The median number of cycles was 10 (range 1-37). Three pts with CRC had disease control > 12 months. Conclusions: The MTD of this regimen is sorafenib 200 mg PO twice daily, days 3-6,10-13 combined with standard doses of FOLFIRI and BEV. Dual VEGF inhibition combined with cytotoxic therapy may provide prolonged disease stabilization for select patients with advanced GI malignancies. Supported by CA69912 and CA15083. Clinical trial information: NCT01383343.

325 Background: TH-302 is a hypoxia-targeted drug with a hypoxia-triggered 2-nitroimidazole component designed to release the DNA alkylator, bromo-isophosphoramide mustard (Br-IPM), when reduced in severe hypoxia. A randomized Phase 2B study (NCT01144455) was conducted to assess the benefit of G+T to standard dose G as first-line therapy of PAC. Methods: An open-label multi-center study of two dose levels of TH-302 (240 mg/m2 or 340 mg/m2) in combination with G versus G alone (randomized 1:1:1). G (1,000 mg/m2) and T were administered IV over 30-60 minutes on Days 1, 8 and 15 of a 28-day cycle. Patients on the G could crossover after progression and be randomized to a G+T arm. The primary efficacy endpoint was a comparison of PFS between the combination arms and G alone (80% power to detect 50% improvement in PFS with one-sided alpha of 10%). Overall survival (OS) was a secondary endpoint. Results: 214 pts were treated; 163 (76%) Stage IV and 51 (24%) Stage IIIB. Median age 65 (range 29-86); 126 M/88 F; 38% ECOG 0/62% ECOG 1. Receiving 6 or more cycles: 32% G; 45% G+T240; 55% G+T340. Median PFS was 3.6 mo in G vs 5.6 mo in G+T240 (p=0.06) and 6.0 mo in G+T340 (p=0.01). Median OS was 6.9 mo in G vs 8.7 in G+T240 (p=0.83) vs 9.2 mo in G+T340 (p=0.80). 6-mo OS was 57% in G vs 69% in G+T240 (p=0.12) and 73% in G+340 (p=0.04); 12-mo OS was 26% in G vs 37% in G+T240 (p=0.18) and 38% in G+340 (p=0.13). RECIST best response was 10% in G vs 17% in G+T240 and 26% in G+T340. 14 and 12 pts in G crossed over to T240 and T340, respectively. Median post crossover PFS was 1.8 mo in T240 vs 2.9 mo in T340 (p=0.13). Median post crossover OS was 2.6 mo in T240 vs 13.4 mo in T340 (p=0.01). AEs leading to discontinuation were: 16% G, 17% G+T240 and 12% G+T340. Rash (47% in G+T340) and stomatitis (42% in G+T340) were greater in combination, 3 pts Grd 3 rash. Grd 3/4 thrombocytopenia were 11% G, 39% G+T240 and 63% G+T340 and Grd 3/4 neutropenia were 31% G, 56% G+T240 and 60% G+T340. Conclusions: The combination of G plus TH-302 improved the PFS of G. Skin and mucosal toxicity and myelosuppression were the most common TH-302 related AEs with no increase in treatment discontinuation. A phase 3 study of TH-302 (340 mg/m2) in combination with G is planned with OS as the primary efficacy endpoint. Clinical trial information: NCT01144455.

284 Background: ODSH, a low anticoagulant heparin derivative, interferes with several important pancreatic cancer cell survival pathways. A randomized phase II trial was initiated to determine if ODSH improves the activity of G/A, a promising pancreatic cancer investigational therapy. Preliminary data are presented here for the first 10 patients administered ODSH as part of an initial run-in phase prior to patient randomization. Methods: Patients with previously untreated, metastatic pancreatic cancer were treated with G (1,000 mg/m2) and A (125 mg/m2) plus ODSH (4 mg/kg bolus followed by a 48 hr. continuous IV infusion at a dose of 0.375 mg/kg/hr) on days 1, 8, and 15 every 28 days until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients were required to have ECOG ≤ 1 and appropriate blood and liver function levels. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Results: 10 patients (median age, 66 years) were administered up to 5 cycles of G/A plus ODSH. Per RECIST criteria, a partial response (PR) was achieved in 5 patients (50%) and the median PFS will exceed 6 months. Disease control (PR or stable disease for > 16 weeks) occurred in all 10 patients. Of 9 patients with baseline elevated CA 19-9 levels, 8 had > 60% reduction. ODSH was well tolerated and unexpectedly appeared to preserve marrow function as no patients had grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia or grade 4 neutropenia during any of the cycles. Conclusions: Although G/A and FOLFIRINOX are important advances, additional progress is necessary for metastatic pancreatic cancer patients. ODSH may interfere with pancreatic cancer invasion, metastasis, and chemo-resistance by inhibiting P- and L-selectins, heparanase, and the HMGB1-RAGE axis, respectively, suggesting that ODSH may enhance chemotherapy activity. This preliminary analysis in a small number of patients is encouraging and consistent with a previous report for this regimen (Von Hoff, J Clin Oncol, 2011). ODSH has also been very well tolerated and early data suggests that it may preserve platelet and neutrophil levels. Further follow-up of the ongoing randomized phase II trial is warranted. Clinical trial information: NCT01461915.