Citations

The emergence of immunotherapy has ushered in a new era in the management of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Various immune check point inhibitors have demonstrated significant benefit in the management of locally advanced NSCLC that are treated with either surgery or concurrent chemoradiation. We provide a comprehensive and up-to-date review of data from key studies, discuss the challenging clinical issue regarding the timing and duration of immunotherapy in patients undergoing surgery, and highlight the unmet needs and future directions of immunotherapy in NSCLC.

e20588 Background: MET exon 14 skipping mutations are seen in about 3% of patients (pts) with NSCLC, with 2 FDA approved METi for pts with stage IV NSCLC harboring it. Besides the original clinical trials, there is a paucity of real-world data about their outcomes, and adverse events (AE). Our aim was to compare and analyze the utilization of capmatinib (cap) and tepotinib (tep) in this population. Methods: We performed a retrospective chart review of the electronic medical records of all pts with stage IV NSCLC treated with METi between the date of FDA-accelerated approval of these drugs, 5/6/20 for cap and 2/3/21 for tep, and 12/1/23. All pts were treated at the Mayo Clinic Health System. We collected data about baseline characteristics, diagnosis, AE, and outcomes. Chi-squared test was used to compare the frequency of AE, while Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate median progression free survival (mPFS). Results: A total of 49 pts were treated with METi. Cap was used in 45 pts, 14 received tep, and 10 pts received both, with tep following cap. In the cap group, median age of diagnosis was 74 years (y), 42.22% were male, and the median number of previous lines of therapy (mPLT) was 0. In the tep group, median age of diagnosis was 72 y, 21.43% were male, and the mPLT was 2. Median ECOG at the time of diagnosis was 1 in both groups. There was no statistically significant difference between AE in both groups. Peripheral edema occurred in 75.56% pts who received cap, and in 64.29% with tep (p = 0.41). Pneumonitis happened in 4.44% with cap, and 7.14% with tep (p = 0.69). Creatinine elevation was seen in 37.78% with cap, while 42.86% with tep (p = 0.73), grade 3 elevation was seen in 5.88% and 16.67% respectively. Abnormality in liver function tests occurred in 35.56% of pts in the cap group, and 28.57% in the tep group (p = 0.63), grade 3/4 abnormality occurred in 31.25% and 0% respectively. Finally, pancreatic enzymes elevation was seen in 33.33% of patients in each group (p = 0.67), with none being grade 3/4. Cap was discontinued in 20% of pts due to AE, while it happened in 28.57% of pts with tep. Dose reduction happened in 64.44% of pts who received cap, and 42.86% who received tep. The mPFS was 12.03 months (m) in the cap group, and 8.94 m in the tep group, which was not statistically significant (p = 0.18). Similarly, the mPFS in those treated with tep following cap was 8.94 m. Conclusions: We performed the first real-word comparison between cap and tep. The results demonstrated similar outcomes with both drugs, and no significant differences in AE, suggesting these agents can be employed equivalently. Importantly, rates of therapy discontinuation and dose reduction were high with both, indicating the importance of closely monitoring these pts. The retrospective nature and small sample size are initial limitations that can be overcome with future multi-centric prospective studies.

TPS2700 Background: Though immunotherapy with anti-PD-1 immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has led to improvements in clinical outcomes in patients with cancer, when used as monotherapy in the advanced setting, only 18-25% of patients respond to ICI. Notably, ICI frequently lacks anti-tumor activity in immune-cold cancers where T cell priming is missing. Recent breakthroughs in identifying personal neoantigens via a comprehensive analysis of cancer sequencing data have brought increased attention to neoantigen cancer vaccines. Personalized cancer vaccines targeting neoantigens have shown early promise. While neoantigens have recently been investigated in some cancer types, the current neoantigen prediction algorithms have often focused on the MHC class-I subtype, single nucleotide mutations (SNM), small insertions and deletions (INDEL). We recently developed an informatics workflow, REAL-neo, for the identification, quality control (QC), and prioritization of both class-I and class-II human leukocyte antigen (HLA) bound neoantigens that arise from somatic SNM, INDEL, aberrant RNA splicing, and gene fusions, generating much more potent neoantigen candidates. Furthermore, we demonstrated robust T-cell response and prolonged survival by combining ICI and cancer vaccines in preclinical models. This single-arm phase I clinical trial is in progress to assess the safety, feasibility, and immunogenicity of personalized neoantigen vaccines in combination with pembrolizumab in patients with advanced solid cancers. Methods: The vaccine consists of up to 20 peptides (15-30 mer) comprising patient-specific neoantigens identified from tumor DNA and mRNA sequencing data using REAL-neo and delivered with GM-CSF as an adjuvant. The first cohort of three patients will be treated at dose level 1 consisting of 4 or 5 peptides at 300 mcg/peptide and GM-CSF 125 mcg per injection site in each of four limbs. After Cohort 1 is deemed safe, the study will expand to cohort 2, when patients will be enrolled at the same dose level for vaccine plus Pembrolizumab 200 mg i.v. Neoantigen vaccine will be given via subcutaneous injection on days 1, 4, 8, 15, and 21 (cohorts 1 and 2) and weeks 5 and 8 (booster dose for cohort 2 only). Cohort 1 has been completed without dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). Enrollment in Cohort 2 began in January 2024. AEs are assessed according to CTCAE v5. and safety findings are reviewed by data safety medical board (DSMB). Key eligibility criteria include 1) histologically confirmed locally advanced or metastatic solid malignancies and 2) cancer progression after at least one line of the standard-of-care (SOC) systemic treatment. For cohort 2, patients must be eligible to receive pembrolizumab per SOC or the treating physician’s judgment. Clinical trial information: NCT05269381 .

Genomic mutations impact non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) biology. The influence of sex and age on the distribution of these alterations is unclear. We analyzed circulating-tumor DNA from individuals with advanced NSCLC from March 2018 to October 2020. EGFR, KRAS, ALK, ROS1, BRAF, NTRK, ERBB2, RET, MET, PIK3CA, STK11, and TP53 alterations were assessed. We evaluated the differences by sex and age (<70 and ≥70) using Fisher’s exact test. Of the 34,277 samples, 30,790 (89.83%) had a detectable mutation and 19,923 (58.12%) had an alteration of interest. The median age of the ctDNA positive population was 69 (18–102), 16,756 (54.42%) were female, and 28,835 (93.65%) had adenocarcinoma. Females had more alterations in all the assessed EGFR mutations, KRAS G12C, and ERBB2 ex20 ins. Males had higher numbers of MET amp and alterations in STK11 and TP53. Patients <70 years were more likely to have alterations in EGFR exon 19 del/exon 20 ins/T790M, KRAS G12C/D, ALK, ROS1, BRAF V600E, ERBB2 Ex20ins, MET amp, STK11, and TP53. Individuals ≥70 years were more likely to have alterations in EGFR L861Q, MET exon 14 skipping, and PIK3CA. We provided evidence of sex- and age-associated differences in the distribution of genomic alterations in individuals with advanced NSCLC.

2598 Background: GI-102 (CD80-IL2v3) is a novel immunocytokine designed to direct IL-2v3 to immune cells and tumor cells. IL-2v3 of GI-102 abolished affinity to IL-2Rα minimizing the impact of IL-2 on Treg cells. Preferential targeting of immune cells and further inhibition of CTLA-4 and PD-L1 via CD80 synergize with potent activity of IL-2v3, resulting in robust proliferation and activation of CD8+ T and NK cells. Here we report preliminary safety and efficacy data of GI-102 from a phase 1/2a trial in patients with metastatic solid tumors. Methods: NCT05824975 is an ongoing, dose escalation (3+3 design) and expansion study to evaluate safety, tolerability, PK, PD and anti-tumor activity of GI-102. Each dose level allows to enroll additional 7 patients to fully inform the safety, PK and PD at that dose level. GI-102 was administered intravenously every 3 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicities. Disease was assessed every 6 weeks using RECIST v1.1. Results: As of 12 Jan 2024, 32 patients were treated in dose escalation: 8 at dose level 0.06 mg/kg, 10 at 0.12 mg/kg, 9 at 0.24 mg/kg and 5 at 0.45 mg/kg. Patients had received median of 3 [1-7] prior lines of therapy, including 25.0% (8/32) who had received ≥ 5 lines and 68.8% (22/32) had experienced immune checkpoint blockade (ICB). No dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were observed until the highest dose of 0.45 mg/kg Q3W. The most common treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs, ≥ 10%) were pyrexia [43.8%] and chills [34.4%]. 5 patients [15.6%] had ≥ Grade 3 TRAEs and no patient reported TRAEs leading to discontinuation of GI-102. In 23 patients (7 cutaneous melanoma, 4 non-small cell lung cancer, 3 ovarian cancer and others) who had at least 1 post-treatment tumor assessment, objective responses were observed in 17.4% (4/23). In patients with metastatic melanoma who previously experienced ICB, overall response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) was 42.9% (3/7) and 85.7% (6/7), respectively, including 3 confirmed partial responses (cPR). The median time to response (TTR) was 6 weeks and duration of response (DoR) was 6.0+, 2.4+ and 1.7+ month, respectively. In patients with metastatic ovarian cancer, ORR and DCR were 33.3% (1/3) and 66.7% (2/3), respectively, including 1 cPR [TTR of 6 weeks; DoR 1.9+ month]. Preliminary PK profile showed target-mediated drug disposition with a half-life of ~48 hours. 0.24 mg/kg of GI-102 resulted in a significant expansion of peripheral lymphocytes, CD8+ T cells (effector & memory) and NK cells, by 4.4 [2.1-9.6], 3.9 [2.0–5.7] and 20.4 [9.5–32.6]-fold change from baseline, respectively. There was no meaningful increase in Treg cells. Conclusions: GI-102 was well tolerated up to dose of 0.45 mg/kg Q3W with meaningful monotherapy activity, regardless of previous ICB experience, in patients who failed on standard of care. The dose-escalation is currently ongoing to identify RP2D. Clinical trial information: NCT05824975 .

e15046 Background: ctDNA assays can be used to assess molecular residual disease, and the value of ctDNA monitoring in disease surveillance and treatment response assessment has been demonstrated in colon, breast, lung, and bladder cancers. However, the data of ctDNA in rare cancers has been lacking. We conducted this retrospective study to investigate the potential roles of ctDNA monitoring in rare tumors in both surveillance and response evaluation. Methods: ctDNA assay results of 12 patients (pts) with rare cancers including adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) (4 pts), salivary gland cancers (3 pts), pleural or peritoneal malignant mesothelioma (4 pts), and anaplastic thyroid cancer (ATC) (1pt) undergoing treatment or surveillance in 2023 at Mayo Clinic Florida were analyzed. The trends of ctDNA levels were correlated with radiographic images findings. Results: Among the 12 patients, ctDNA was detected in at least one time point in 9 (75%) pts, including 1 (100%) ATC pt, 2 (66%) salivary gland pts, 3 (75%) malignant mesothelioma pts, and 3 (75%) ACC pts. Among these 9 pts, 5 pts had ctDNA collected at more than one timepoints, and the trends of ctDNA levels were consistent with image findings in all 5 pts. Among these 5 pts, one pt received definitive surgery for ACC with clearance of ctDNA after the surgery and one salivary gland cancer pt was undergoing surveillance and later developed disease progression. The other 3 pts were undergoing palliative systemic therapy and had responded to treatments. Conclusions: ctDNA was detectable in majority of the patients with rare malignancies reviewed in this study, including ACC, ATC, pleural or peritoneal malignant mesothelioma, and salivary gland cancers. Further study is warranted to investigate the role of ctDNA monitoring in surveillance and treatment response evaluation in rare malignancies.

269 Background: There are strong data showing that patients (pts) with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) receiving chemotherapy experience better quality of life (QOL) and longer overall survival (OS) when palliative care (PC) services are integrated early in their treatment course. Therefore, at our cancer center, pts with stage IV NSCLC have been referred to PC by oncology providers. In this study, we evaluated the uptake of PC services, specifically in pts with NSCLC who received immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). ICIs have been considered to have less severe or less frequent adverse effects as compared to chemotherapy, possibly leading to fewer referrals to PC. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of all pts at the Mayo Clinic Cancer Center in Florida who received single-agent ICI therapy for the treatment of stage IV NSCLC at any point between July 1, 2015, and July 1, 2022. The primary aim was to evaluate the uptake of PC services before or during treatment with ICIs. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize pt demographics and outcomes. Results: 129 pts were identified. 53.4% were male, and 46.6% were female. The majority of pts (84.4%) were white. 62 pts (48.0%) were seen by a PC provider before or during ICI treatment; 41 of these (31.7%) were seen by PC after starting ICI therapy. When grouped by year of ICI initiation, 30/73 pts (41.0%) treated between 2015 and June 2018 were seen by a PC provider, as compared to 15/31 pts (48.3%) treated between July 2018 and June 2020 and 17/25 pts (68.0%) treated between July 2020 and July 2022. Interestingly, the majority of pts who received PC services in the 2020-2022 group (12/17, or 70.5%) were seen by a PC provider for the first time prior to ICI initiation, whereas the majority of pts who received PC services prior to July 2020 (37/45, or 82.2%) were seen by a PC provider for the first time after ICI initiation. The mean number of PC visits increased from 1.59 in the 2015-2018 group to 1.84 in the 2018-2020 group and 4.96 in the 2020-2022 group. Conclusions: Uptake of PC services in pts with stage IV NSCLC receiving single-agent ICIs at our cancer center has increased over time, which is encouraging. Nevertheless, the numbers remain suboptimal, with less than 70% of pts receiving PC services. We plan to develop a multidisciplinary quality improvement project involving implementation of a mechanism to ensure that most patients with stage IV NSCLC, regardless of the type of systemic treatment they receive, are receiving PC services.

e21161 Background: Patients with stage IV NSCLC undergo frequent restaging scans (RS). While vital to assess treatment response, RS add anxiety and financial burdens to patients. The ideal frequency of RS is unclear. The numerous treatment options available, such as targeted therapy (TT) and immunotherapy (IO), and the variability in frequency of RS in the trials that led to their approval reflect this uncertainty. Due to the lack of clear guidelines about their ideal interval in daily practice, we reviewed the heterogeneity in frequency of RS in those trials, comparing it to the reported progression-free survival (PFS). Methods: In this study, we reviewed the FDA-approved drugs for stage IV NSCLC since 10/18/2016 and selected the TT and IO. Each trial that led to approval was reviewed, collecting the frequency of RS and the median PFS for the intervention (IA) and control arms (CA). Results: 18 TT drugs and 12 IO regimens, with and without chemotherapy (chemo), were found. Among them, the frequency of RS varied from every 4 to 9 weeks (w) upfront, later modified to every 6 to 12 w until disease progression. The median PFS for both groups in the IA ranged from 2.8 to 19.4 months (m), and from 3.0 to 12.4 m in the CA. The TT group had drugs directed at 7 different mutations, and it presented more discrepancy in terms of restaging frequency. The period between RS varied from every 4 to 8 w initially, later modified to every 6 to 12 w. However, 11 of 18 trials had an interval of every 6 w. The shortest median PFS in the IA arm was 5.4 m, and 5.6 m in the CA. While the longest median PFS was 19.4 m in the IA and 12.4 m in the CA. The IO group included 5 regimens with chemo and 7 without. The interval between RS varied from 6 to 9 w originally, to every 8 to 12 w later. Yet, 8 of 12 regimens’ trials scanned patients every 6 w initially. The median PFS in the IA ranged from 2.8 to 10.3 m, and between 3.0 to 6.5 m in the CA. Conclusions: We observed notable heterogeneity among trials regarding the frequency of RS in patients treated for stage IV NSCLC. When comparing these intervals to the median PFS, we noted the shortest PFS reported is longer than most adopted intervals. This may indicate RS were obtained more frequently than needed. The increased frequency of RS raises a burden for patients and the medical system, while contributing to disparities. This finding, coupled with further comparisons between the frequency of RS in trials and in daily practice, may pave the way for prospective studies analyzing the ideal interval for RS. This can lead to a more efficacious and less burdensome strategy for patients. [Table: see text]

e21157 Background: Atezolizumab is superior to docetaxel for patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who are pretreated with platinum-based chemotherapy based on the POPLAR and OAK trials. However, patients who received prior immunotherapy (IO) were excluded from these trials. The preferred subsequent therapy for these patients remains to be docetaxel +/- ramucirumab. The efficacy and safety of atezolizumab as a subsequent therapy in IO-pretreated patients are unknown. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of all patients with locally advanced/metastatic NSCLC who were pretreated with IO at Mayo Clinic Florida/Rochester in 2016 - 2022. Patients who received subsequent therapy of atezolizumab alone (Atezo), docetaxel (Doce), or docetaxel + ramucirumab (Doce+Ram) were included. Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test were used for survival analysis. Results: Among 169 patients included, 51.5% were female, 91.7% were Caucasian. The median age was 67 (35 – 92). The histology was predominantly adenocarcinoma (76.3%). The most common metastatic sites were bone (51.5%), followed by CNS (44.4%). The median number of prior therapies was 2 (1 – 8). Pembrolizumab was the most used prior IO (87%), followed by durvalumab (10.7%) and nivolumab (8.3%). 13.6% (n = 23), 49.1% (n = 83), and 37.2% (n = 63) patients received subsequent Atezo, Doce, and Doce+Ram, respectively. PFS was improved in the Atezo group compared with Doce group (median PFS 3.9 vs. 3.7 months, HR 0.57, 95% CI 0.37 – 0.87, p = 0.015*). Notably, a prominent percentage of patients in the Atezo group appear to have long-term PFS benefits, demonstrated by 1-year PFS rates of 26.1%, 3.6%, and 4.8% (p = 0.003**), and 2-year PFS rates of 17.4%, 0%, and 0% (p = 0.002**), in the Atezo, Doce, and Doce+Ram groups, respectively. The median OS (months) in the Atezo, Doce, and Doce+Ram groups were 17.5, 7.6, and 11.5, respectively; and were 29.5, 7.2, and 6.9, respectively in the PD-L1 > 50% subgroups. The Atezo group showed significantly greater OS improvement compared with the Doce group (HR 0.42, 95% CI 0.26 – 0.66, p = 0.001**). This benefit appears greater and remains statistically significant in the PD-L1 > 1% (HR 0.39, 95% CI 0.22 – 0.71, p = 0.005**) and PD-L1 > 50% (HR 0.37, 95% CI 0.15 – 0.91, p = 0.022*) subgroups. 5 of 23 (21.7%) patients in the Atezo group developed immune-related adverse events. 3 patients were grade 3 or 4. No grade 5 event. Conclusions: We observed statistically significant and clinically meaningful PFS and OS benefits of atezolizumab monotherapy compared with docetaxel in patients with advanced NSCLC who were pretreated with IO. The OS benefits of atezolizumab over docetaxel +/- ramucirumab was greater in PD-L1 > 1% and PD-L1 > 50% subgroups. Atezolizumab appears to be tolerable in IO-pretreated patients. These findings need to be verified in a prospective study.