Citations

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The Management of Myelomeningocele Study established a role for maternal-fetal surgery for myelomeningocele (MMC) but was limited to patients with a maternal body mass index (BMI) less than 35 kg/m 2 . However, as the rate of obesity has increased globally, some centers have extended the Management of Myelomeningocele Study criteria to include patients with a BMI of 35 to 40 kg/m 2 . We used the Fetal MMC Consortium registry to analyze the complications associated with maternal-fetal surgery in patients with a maternal BMI < 35 kg/m 2 compared with 35 to 40 kg/m 2 . METHODS: The prospective observational Fetal MMC Consortium registry sponsored by the North American Fetal Therapy Network was used to extract deidentified “maternal complication” and “fetal/neonatal complication” data sets, corresponding to patients with complete entries related to maternal or fetal/neonatal complications, respectively. Demographics, clinical characteristics, and complications were recorded. Propensity score matching was conducted with a 2:1 algorithm, and outcomes were compared between patients with BMI < 35 kg/m 2 and those with BMI 35 to 40 kg/m 2 . RESULTS: Propensity score matching resulted in 156 patients with BMI < 35 kg/m 2 and 78 patients with BMI 35 to 40 kg/m 2 in the “maternal complication” data set, and 130 patients with BMI < 35 kg/m 2 and 65 patients with BMI 35 to 40 kg/m 2 in the “fetal/neonatal complication” data set. No significant differences in the median number of maternal (2.0 vs 2.0; P = .257) or median number of fetal/neonatal (1.0 vs 1.0; P = .409) complications were observed between the 2 cohorts. Furthermore, prematurity rates did not differ significantly between the BMI < 35 and BMI 35 to 40 cohorts. CONCLUSION: Maternal-fetal surgery for open neural tube defect closure is not associated with increased risks among patients with a maternal BMI of 35 to 40 kg/m 2 . Extending the initial inclusion criteria for prenatal MMC closure has the potential to expand access to patients with a higher risk for open neural tube defects.

Objectives: The role of femoral version (FV[MOU1] ) in the pre-arthritic hip pain remains increasingly recognized, including in femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). Increased femoral version or decreased femoral version may play a role in hip biomechanics contributing to hip instability or impingement, respectively. The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes of hip arthroscopy for FAI across different femoral version groups in a multicenter prospective cohort study. Methods: A prospective multicenter cohort study of 677 FAI patients undergoing primary hip arthroscopy was performed. The current study included 603 patients with low-dose CT performed preoperatively for measurement of femoral version from the larger cohort. Inclusion criteria were patients aged 14-45 years with idiopathic FAI. Exclusion criteria were previous ipsilateral hip procedures, associated disorders, or Tönnis 2 or greater osteoarthritis. Femoral version was measured on low-dose computed tomography (CT) utilizing the Yoshioka oblique method and was broken into five subgroups: <5° (decreased FV), 6-15° (normal FV), 16-25° (mildly increased FV), 26-35° (moderately increased FV), 35°+ (severely increased FV). Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were measured at a minimum one-year follow-up. The modified Harris hip score (mHHS) was assessed relative to the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of 8 and patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) of 74. Additional PROs included the HOOS Pain and Sports/Recreation subscores and the iHOT-12 score. Composite failure was defined as a reoperation for persistent symptoms or a failure to achieve either the mHHS MCID or PASS. Independent t-test (Mann-Whitney U) and ANOVA were utilized to compare groups. Results: Males had statistically lower femoral version than females (14.0° vs 18.0°; p<0.001). In females, 38.0% had mildly increased FV, 17.9% had moderately increased FV, and 3.6% had severely elevated FV. This is compared to 27.6%, 9.2%, and 1.8% in males, respectively (all p<0.001). Decreased FV was present in 7.1% of males, compared to 5.9% of females. Increased or decreased femoral versions appear to have similar outcomes to normal version when evaluated by PROs or outcome states. In fact, mildly increased and moderate increased FV group demonstrated the best outcomes. Changes in HOOS pain and sports subscores were significantly higher for these groups. Severely increased FV, >35°, was only present in 2.8% of patients but did demonstrate a higher rate of composite failure (15.4%) compared to moderately increased FV (3.1%). The decreased FV group had a composite failure of 10.4% compared to normal femoral version, 16-25° (10.2%). Conclusions: In a patient cohort undergoing hip arthroscopy for FAI, significant differences in FV between males and females were present. Overall, in a multicenter prospective cohort study, the outcomes of hip arthroscopy for FAI did not seem to differ between increased or decreased femoral versions but were superior in mild to moderately increased FV. Future research with longer-term follow-up is still needed to definitively establish the longevity of outcomes of hip arthroscopy relative to FV.

OBJECTIVE Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis is a common cause of back and leg pain influenced by factors like instability, disc degeneration, facet arthropathy, and psychosocial phenotype. Patients’ experience of high-severity pain is complex, with significant implications for surgical planning. The goal of this study was to assess the impact of back pain catastrophizing on long-term outcomes following lumbar spondylolisthesis surgery. METHODS This study uses the Quality Outcomes Database (QOD) lumbar spondylolisthesis dataset and includes prospectively collected data from the 12 highest-enrolling clinical sites participating in the QOD lumbar module. The authors reviewed patients undergoing single-segment surgery for grade 1 degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis. Severe baseline numeric rating scale for back pain (NRS-BP) scores (≥ 8) were classified as "catastrophizing," and mild to moderate pain scores (< 8) were classified as "non-catastrophizing." Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were compared for catastrophizing versus non-catastrophizing patients at 60 months. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to assess the impact of catastrophizing on PROs, with multivariate analysis controlling for variables initially reaching a p value < 0.10. RESULTS Of the 608 patients in this analysis, 260 (42.8%) experienced catastrophizing while 348 (57.2%) did not. Catastrophizing patients were significantly younger (59.9 ± 12.2 years vs 63.9 ± 11.7 years, p < 0.001), less often had ≥ 4 years of college education (31.2% vs 42.5%, p = 0.004), and more often used private insurance (58.8% vs 47.7%, p = 0.01). The catastrophizing cohort also had higher rates of depression (24.6% vs 17.0%, p = 0.02) and back pain predominance (45.4% vs 32.2%, p < 0.001). Surgical and perioperative characteristics did not significantly differ between cohorts. Although catastrophizing patients typically reported worse PRO scores at both baseline and 60 months, they demonstrated significantly greater improvement and minimal clinically important difference (MCID) achievement across almost all PROs at 60 months (p < 0.05). However, North American Spine Society (NASS) satisfaction scores at 60 months did not differ significantly between cohorts. Multivariate analysis found that catastrophizing significantly predicted 60-month NRS-BP change (β −1.45, 95% CI −1.81 to −1.09; p < 0.001) and MCID achievement (OR 1.98, 95% CI 1.52–2.58; p < 0.001) but not mean NRS-BP score or other metrics, including NASS satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS Despite presenting with worse baseline symptoms, patients with pain catastrophizing experienced substantial and clinically meaningful improvement following surgery for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis. Patient satisfaction was comparable between cohorts, reflecting a nuanced balance between greater absolute improvement and persistence of residual symptoms. These findings underscore that catastrophizing should not be viewed as a barrier to surgical success, while pointing to the need for proactive expectation setting and shared decision-making.

Abstract INTRODUCTION We investigated associations of plasma proteins with blood‐based amyloid/tau/neurodegeneration/inflammation (A/T/N/I) biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease (AD). METHODS Plasma proteomics and clinical data from the Indiana AD Research Center ( N = 498) were used. Association analysis of plasma proteins with blood A/T/N/I biomarkers as well as diagnosis was performed, followed by replication in an independent cohort ( N = 323), network analysis, pathway enrichment, and machine learning classification to identify proteins and pathways related to AD risk. RESULTS We identified 35 proteins associated with AD, 20 of which were replicated in the independent cohort. We identified 150, 448, and 219 proteins associated with T/N/I biomarkers, respectively, revealing biomarker‐specific pathways. Network analysis identified two modules associated with T/N/I biomarkers, preserved in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), and their enriched pathways. The classification model of proteins effectively differentiated AD (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.930). CONCLUSION Our findings suggest dysregulated plasma proteins and pathways in AD, enhancing our understanding of molecular mechanisms and diagnostic strategies for AD. Highlights Plasma proteins were identified as being associated with Alzheimer's disease (AD) and plasma biomarkers. The identified proteins were replicated in both plasma and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) proteomics. The identified proteins were associated with AD biomarker‐specific pathways. The identified proteins improved the performance of the AD classification. Protein network analysis identified network modules and their enriched pathways.

Abstract INTRODUCTION African American (AA) individuals are underrepresented in biomarker studies for Alzheimer's disease (AD). Biomarkers that reflect the heterogeneity of AD and achieve the greatest accuracy across populations are sorely needed. METHODS Untargeted proteome measurements were obtained using the SomaScan 7k platform to identify novel plasma biomarkers for AD in AA participants with clinical diagnoses of AD dementia ( n = 181) and cognitively unimpaired (CU, n = 142). Machine learning was used to identify a set of plasma proteins that yielded the best classification accuracy. RESULTS A set of 36 proteins achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.94 to classify AD dementia versus CU, a 16% improvement over age, sex, and apolipoprotein E ( APOE) . This finding was replicated in multiple plasma and brain datasets (AUCs 0.73–0.97). Our findings underscore the importance of matrisome and cerebrovascular dysfunction in AD pathophysiology. DISCUSSION This study demonstrates the potential of biomarker discovery through untargeted plasma proteomics and machine learning. Highlights Conducted large‐scale plasma proteomics in Alzheimer's disease (AD) versus cognitively unimpaired controls. Machine learning biomarker discovery was replicated in an independent cohort. Novel set of proteins distinguishes AD versus controls with high accuracy (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.94). Achieved reproducibility across multiple replication cohorts (AUC = 0.73–0.97). Network analyses implicates matrisome biology and cerebrovascular dysfunction.

OBJECTIVE Coexisting medical conditions are increasingly prevalent in surgical populations. The impact of multiple comorbidities on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and endotypes of frequently co-occurring conditions for cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) remain unclear. This study explores whether CSM patients with multimorbidity have worse baseline and postoperative PROs and less functional improvement after surgery compared to those with few or no comorbidities. The authors also investigated whether distinct comorbidity endotypes exist among CSM surgical patients and whether they influence postoperative outcomes. METHODS The prospective Quality Outcomes Database (QOD) was used to assess patients undergoing surgery for CSM. Multimorbidity was defined as ≥ 2 chronic conditions, including diabetes, coronary artery disease, peripheral vascular disease, arthritis, chronic renal disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, Parkinson’s disease, multiple sclerosis, depression, and anxiety. Baseline characteristics and 24-month PROs were assessed across multiple-comorbidity status, including modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association (mJOA), Neck Disability Index (NDI), visual analog scale for neck and arm pain, EQ-5D, and patient satisfaction scores. Clusters were identified from the full cohort using k-medoids, revealing subgroups with similar comorbidity endotypes. RESULTS The final cohort included 1141 CSM patients (83.1% reaching 24-month follow-up), with 761 (66.7%) having 0 or 1 comorbidity and 380 (33.3%) ≥ 2 comorbidities. The multimorbidity cohort was older (mean age 62.6 ± 11.2 vs 59.5 ± 12.0 years, p < 0.001), more likely to be female (52.9% vs 44.7%, p = 0.011), and had a higher BMI (mean 31.1 ± 6.7 vs 29.7 ± 6.2 kg/m 2 , p < 0.001). Multimorbidity patients exhibited worse mJOA, NDI, and EQ-5D scores at baseline and 24 months (p < 0.05). On multivariable analysis, the total number of comorbidities was not significantly associated with any PRO measures. Four comorbidity clusters were identified: low burden, arthritis, diabetes, and high burden. On one-way ANOVA, the baseline mJOA score was significantly different across clusters (p = 0.003). At 24 months, the mJOA score was significantly lower in the diabetes and high-burden endotypes. Twenty-four-month score change and minimal clinically important difference (MCID) achievement of all PROs remained similar across clusters (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS While patients with multimorbidity have worse baseline and postoperative PROs, they achieve similar functional and pain-related improvements following CSM surgery. Similarly, the comorbidity endotypes identified in this QOD cohort suggest that certain patterns of coexisting chronic conditions, such as overlapping diabetes and arthritis, are associated with different levels of disability but may not diminish the effectiveness of surgical intervention.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: There has been limited assessment between anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion (ACDF) and anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (ACCF) on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in the treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. We sought to compare PROMs from two-level ACDF with single-level ACCF procedures. We evaluate these results in the context of minimum clinically important difference (MCID) thresholds, which have not been performed previously. METHODS: This retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from the Quality Outcomes Database Spine Collaborative Research Study Group compared two-level ACDF and single-level ACCF at 3-, 12-, and 24 months postoperatively. PROMs included arm pain Numeric Rating Scale, neck pain Numeric Rating Scale, Neck Disability Index, and North American Spine Society Patient Satisfaction Index. Multivariate logistic regression was used to determine differences in perioperative outcomes, as well as the impact of two-level ACDF vs one-level ACCF on PROMs. MCID thresholds were based off previously established limits. RESULTS: Three hundred and thirty patients were included (236 ACDF, 94 ACCF), and the follow-up rate was 82% at 2 years. There was a significantly higher baseline age, American Society of Anesthesiologists grade, proportion of diabetes, osteoarthritis, ambulation dependence, and myelopathy severity in the ACCF cohort. On multivariable analysis, the ACCF group had greater average length of stay and estimated blood loss. There were no significant differences between reoperation rates or nonroutine discharge. There were similar rates of MCID achievement for PROMs at all time points. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that both ACDF and ACCF procedures for cervical spondylotic myelopathy are able to achieve similar, clinically meaningful improvements in PROMs by 2 years. Patients undergoing single-level ACCF have more estimated blood loss and longer length of stay, as well as worse baseline myelopathy. Both procedures have efficacious, durable outcomes. It is reasonable that other factors, such as radiographic characteristics and patient symptoms, may influence patient selection for ACDF vs ACCF.