Citations

Abstract Background Management of acute cardiogenic shock for post-cardiotomy and post-transplant patients remains challenging. The use of veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) for circulatory support is a key intervention, yet the optimal cannulation strategy—central vs. peripheral—remains debated. This study evaluates outcomes associated with each approach to inform clinical decision-making. Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on 319 patients who received VA-ECMO for CS intraoperatively or within 24 hours postoperatively at Mayo Clinic (2010–2023). Patients were categorized into central (n=241) and peripheral (n=78) ECMO groups. Propensity score (PS) weighting using stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting was applied to minimize baseline imbalances. Outcomes included in-hospital mortality, bleeding requiring reoperation, limb ischemia, prolonged ventilation (>7 days), and sepsis. Results The median age at ECMO initiation was 68.5 years, with 37.3% female patients. Right ventricular (RV) dysfunction was the predominant indication for ECMO initiation (p<0.001). After PS weighting, no significant difference was observed in in-hospital mortality (49.8% vs. 44.5%, p=0.416) or other major complications between central and peripheral ECMO (see Table 1). Stroke was more frequent in central ECMO (P = 0.159), though not statistically significant. Reoperation for bleeding occurred significantly more often in central ECMO in the unweighted analysis (P = 0.047), but the difference lost statistical significance after weighting (P = 0.071). Renal failure was comparable between groups (P = 0.888). Notably, sternal infection rates were comparable between groups (P=0.921). Acute limb ischemia was more common in the peripheral group (P = 0.209). Limb ischemia associated with central ECMO was not caused by the ECMO cannulas but was instead related to concomitant use of femoral intra-aortic balloon pump. Conclusions After propensity score weighting, analysis showed no significant differences in mortality or complications between central ECMO and peripheral ECMO for post-cardiotomy and post-transplant cardiogenic shock.

OBJECTIVE: Volatile anesthetics (VAs) are gaining renewed interest as a sedation strategy in the intensive care, offering an alternative to traditional IV agents. VAs provide several pharmacologic advantages, including rapid onset and offset, minimal systemic metabolism, and favorable recovery profiles. Advances in delivery systems enabled the safe and practical administration of volatile agents in the ICU. Thus, we aimed to describe the pharmacology and safety aspects of inhaled agents as well as the systems designed to deliver VAs in the ICU. DATA SOURCES: Relevant literature was identified through PubMed and MEDLINE databases. STUDY SELECTION: Original research, review articles, commentaries, and guidelines addressing safety, efficacy, and use of VAs in adult ICU patients were included. DATA EXTRACTION: Studies were reviewed by the authors, with key findings summarized and organized by pharmacologic properties, delivery systems, and safety domains. DATA SYNTHESIS: VAs are halogenated hydrocarbons whose mechanism of action is not fully understood. Although the CNS is the primary site of action, the end-tidal concentration of exhaled anesthetic is used to monitor clinical effects such as immobility to a noxious stimulus. Inhaled agents have unique pharmacokinetics, minimal metabolisms, and distinct recovery. The side effect profile is also unique, with malignant hyperthermia being the most feared, yet rare complication. Two systems for inhalational sedation delivery are available internationally, with one currently under evaluation in the United States. The systems are composed of a miniature vaporizer, delivery controller, and a monitor. The systems have distinct safety considerations, such as tidal volume limits. CONCLUSIONS: VAs can be used as sedative agents in the ICU. This article comprehensively reviews the pharmacology of VAs along with their safety profile and describes the structure and function of miniature vaporizers currently available on the world market.