Citations

Background: Musculoskeletal disorders (MSKDs) are the leading cause of disability worldwide. The associations between socioeconomic and lifestyle factors and MSKDs have been widely studied in Europe and North America. However, little data are available about their relationship in Latin America. Objectives: To estimate the prevalence of chronic MSKDs in Brazil and assess their relationship with socioeconomic and lifestyle factors. Design: This is a cross-sectional study, based on a subanalysis of the open-access database from the Brazilian National Health Survey 2019. This survey was a nationwide, cross-sectional, door-to-door study that included 87,648 adults and was conducted between 2019 and 2020. Methods: Prevalence estimates were based on weighted sample strata, and the relationship between MSKD and socioeconomic and lifestyle factors was examined through network analysis and weighted Poisson regression models with robust variance. Results: The weighted prevalence of chronic MSKDs was estimated at 26.1% (95% confidence interval, 25.5%–26.8%). In the network analysis, including all socioeconomic and lifestyle variables, MSKDs prevalence was notably linked to higher body mass index, drinking, smoking, and low income. In the regression models, MSKD prevalence was associated with obesity, sleep disorders, smoking, alcohol consumption, and depression, and inversely associated with physical activity, even after controlling for the sociodemographic disparities. Conclusion: This study identifies specific socioeconomic and lifestyle factors associated with MSKDs and highlights the need for immediate national health promotion programs focused on MSKDs prevention through targeted lifestyle modifications, especially in populations belonging to the lower-income strata in Brazil.

Abstract Background We examined how the COVID-19 pandemic influenced influenza vaccination, healthcare engagement, and patient satisfaction. Methods We retrospectively analyzed influenza vaccination records and patient experience surveys of adult primary care patients in southeastern Minnesota during two 3-year phases: Prepandemic (1 January 2017–28 February 2020) and Pandemic-Plus (1 March 2020–31 December 2023). Vaccination status was defined as “always vaccinated” (AV), “never vaccinated” (NV), or “intermittently vaccinated” (IV) for seasonal influenza. Results During the Pandemic-Plus phase, 7.0% (n = 3556) of the Prepandemic AV and 48.7% (n = 16 710) of the Prepandemic IV patients never received another influenza vaccine. Compared to AV, IV and NV patients were more likely to reside in areas with greater socioeconomic deprivation (odds ratio [OR], 1.58 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 1.53–1.62] and 1.99 [1.94–2.05], respectively), have a high school education or less (2.86 [2.74–2.98] and 3.38 [3.23–3.53]), and report healthcare disengagement (1.59 [1.55–1.64] and 4.21 [4.09–4.33]). After adjusting for Area Deprivation Index and medical comorbidities, healthcare disengagement increased among the NV versus AV between phases (3.33 [3.24–3.41] and 4.23 [4.10–4.35]). In a subgroup analysis those with severe comorbidities were less likely AV (NV vs AV: 1.21 [1.14–1.27]) and more dissatisfied with care (NV vs AV: 1.25 [1.18–1.33]). Conclusions The COVID-19 pandemic altered vaccination behaviors and healthcare satisfaction, especially among those at high risk of developing influenza-related complications. Medical providers and public health officials should be aware of factors associated with vaccine refusal to better target interventions.

Background Given the low haemorrhagic risk of intracranial low-grade dural arteriovenous fistulas (dAVFs), the benefits of routine intervention remain controversial. This study compares patient outcomes treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) versus conservative management. Method Multicentre retrospective analysis of the Consortium for Dural Arteriovenous Fistula Outcomes Research and the International Radiosurgery Research Foundation data. Inclusion criteria were (1) intracranial low-grade dAVF diagnosed by catheter-based angiography, (2) no prior dAVF-related haemorrhage and (3) management with upfront SRS (intervention group) or conservative management (observation group). The primary outcome was symptomatic improvement. Secondary outcomes included dAVF obliteration, up-conversion, haemorrhage, improvement and favourable modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at follow-up. Results 304 patients with a mean age of 56 years (SD 13.5) and a follow-up of 46.7 months (SD 45.5) were included. 135 (44.4%) were managed conservatively and 169 (55.6%) had upfront SRS. Compared with the observation group, symptomatic and mRS Score improvement (≥1-point decrease in baseline score) was more likely in the intervention group (95.1% vs 58.5%; OR=13.75 (5.61–33.69) and 37.0% vs 24.0%; OR=1.85 (1.09–3.15), respectively). These findings remained significant after multiple imputation and propensity score matching. Remaining outcomes were similar between groups. The all-cause mortality rate was 5.4% (n=16), unrelated to the dAVF or treatment. Five (3.0%) SRS-related complications were reported and resolved during the follow-up period. Conclusions SRS was associated with increased symptomatic and mRS Score improvement for low-grade dAVFs compared with conservative management. SRS had a low complication risk and did not appear to alter dAVF obliteration or haemorrhage. Future prospective trials on SRS as a first-line intervention for symptomatic low-grade dAVFs should be considered.

5069 Background: Ra-223 improves the overall survival in patients with mCRPC to the bone. We assessed the safety of standard-of-care Ra-223 in combination with peposertib, a DNA-dependent protein kinase inhibitor, with or without avelumab, an anti-PD-L1 antibody. Methods: Patients with mCRPC and two or more skeletal metastases identified by bone scintigraphy with or without lymph node metastases up to 3 cm in size, but no visceral metastases, were eligible. Progression after progression after at least one androgen receptor pathway inhibitor or taxane was required. Phase 1 consisted of a two-step sequential safety lead-in using a 3+3 design. Step 1 combined 6 standard cycles of Ra-223 (55 kBq/kg), with increasing doses of peposertib: 50, 100, and 200 mg PO bid on days 3-26 of each cycle. Step 2 combined Ra-223 with the maximum tolerated dose of peposertib and added standard avelumab 800 mg IV every 14 days, starting at cycle 2 of Ra-223. Results: A total of 9 patients participated in Step 1, where the maximum tolerated peposertib dose of 200 mg PO bid with Ra-223 was deemed tolerable. A total of 6 patients participated in Step 2 and the combination of Ra-223, peposertib at 200 mg PO bid, and standard avelumab was deemed tolerable. Of the 15 patients in Phase 1, none experienced grade 4 or higher treatment-related toxicities, while 7 experienced grade 3 toxicities, including neutropenia (1), anemia (1), cardiac chest pain (1), fall (1), maculopapular rash (2), and lymphopenia (2). The median (Q1, Q3) PSA velocity from the beginning to the end of treatment was lower for Step 2 versus Step 1: 2.1 (-0.1, 4.6) versus 23.5 (18.6, 77.1) ng/mL/month (p = 0.0067). OS and PFS were calculated with the limitation that the Phase 1 was non-randomized. Median OS was not reached for Step 2, as only 1 of 6 patients had died, versus 15.2 months for Step 1, where 8 out of 9 patients had died (p = 0.0537). The patient who died in Step 2 discontinued therapy prematurely after 3 cycles due to progression and survived 15.2 months (the 5 alive completed all 6 cycles). The median radiographic PFS was 7 months for Step 2 versus 12.7 months for Step 1 (p = 0.8910). Conclusions: The combination of Ra-223 and peposertib, with or without avelumab was well tolerated. The triplet combination showed the most promising results at this early evaluation. We continue to accrue in the randomized Phase II portion of the trial. Clinical trial information: NCT04071236 .

3040 Background: EVEREST-2 is a first-in-human, phase 1/2 trial to assess the safety and efficacy of A2B694, an autologous, logic-gated Tmod CAR T therapy targeted to MSLN, which is normally expressed in the mesothelium and can be upregulated in many solid tumors. A2B694 is designed to overcome challenges of on-target, off-tumor toxicity that have limited other MSLN-targeted approaches by combining a CAR-activating receptor targeting MSLN with a blocker CAR that recognizes HLA-A*02, to distinguish between normal and tumor cells (Tokatlian, et al. J Immunother Cancer. 2022). Methods: Adults with recurrent unresectable, locally advanced, or metastatic cancers with MSLN expression who have progressed after standard-of-care therapy are eligible for EVEREST-2. Enrollment to EVEREST-2 and collection of T-cells occurs through the ongoing prescreening study BASECAMP-1 (NCT04981119). When clinically appropriate, A2B694 is manufactured from cryopreserved T cells, and patients undergo lymphodepletion before A2B694 infusion. The dose-escalation phase is evaluating the safety and tolerability of A2B694 to identify the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D). Dose escalation was started at 1x10 8 Tmod positive cells (dose level [DL] 1) and will increase up to 14x10 8 in combination with low-dose IL-2 (DL 5). The dose-expansion phase will confirm RP2D and collect biomarker data to further characterize A2B694. Results: As of January 15, 2025, 5 participants (median age: 60 years; range, 50-84) have enrolled on EVEREST-2 and received A2B694 at DLs 1-2; participants had ovarian cancer (n = 3), pancreatic cancer (n = 1), and non-small cell lung cancer (n = 1) and had received a median of 4 prior lines of therapy (range, 1-7). Lymphodepleting chemotherapy was well tolerated with no significant cytopenias observed. The most common adverse events were lymphopenia (7 [14.6%]) and decreased appetite (6 [12.5%]). There were no dose-limiting toxicities, cytokine release syndrome, nor related neurotoxicity. One participant was admitted to the hospital for decreased appetite. No long-term toxicities have been noted up to 7.5 months post-infusion. Of the participants who have received A2B694, 5 were efficacy evaluable at DLs 1-2. A2B694 was detected post-infusion in the peripheral blood in all patients. Additionally, A2B694 was detected in an abdominal tumor biopsy from a patient with pancreatic cancer 42 days post-infusion. Conclusions: The logic-gated approach was successful at reducing toxicity seen with prior MSLN-targeted CAR T therapies, and A2B694 showed successful CAR T expansion and tumor infiltration. The maximum tolerated dose has not been reached, and results from the dose-escalation phase continue to determine the RP2D. Clinical trial information: NCT06051695 .

12011 Background: Patients (pts) with high HCT-Comorbidity Index scores (HCT-CI of ≥3), older age (≥65 years), and/or who are frail per gait speed (<0.8 meters/second) have increased morbidity and mortality after allo-HCT compared to younger and healthier counterparts. We report the phase II analysis (PIIA) and interim phase III primary outcome analysis (PIIIA) of a seamless phase II/III prospective, randomized clinical trial conducted at 11 transplant centers to test new approaches to improve quality of life (QOL) in this population. Methods: Phase II compared specialist-administered supportive and palliative care (SPC), patient-administered management of comorbidities (MC, e.g. physical exercise, stress reduction, etc), both (SPC+MC), and usual care (UC) for change in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy – Bone Marrow Transplantation (FACT-BMT) QOL scores from baseline to day 90 (D90). Pts deceased prior to D90 were assigned FACT-BMT score=0. The winning phase II arm moved forward versus UC in phase III. Results: PIIA was done after enrolling 35 pts to each of the 4 study arms. Calculating the difference between FACT-BMT scores on D90 minus baseline, excluding missing data, indicated that only SPC resulted in a small improvement in QOL compared to either MC or SPC+MC (Table); hence SPC was the winning phase II arm. The PIIIA was conducted after enrolling 158 SPC pts and 153 UC pts. The SPC and UC arms were well balanced with median age (both 68 years), HCT-CI ≥3 (49% vs 55%), frailty per gait speed (13% vs 12%), female sex (41% vs 34%), non-white race (9.5% vs 11.5%), and Hispanic or unreported ethnicity (7.7% vs 5.7%), respectively. After median follow-up of 362 days, 45 pts had died in each arm. The mean QOL difference between D90 and baseline was 2.83 for SPC and 4.27 for UC (difference of differences, -1.44, 95% CI of difference, -5.03 to 2.14, p=0.43). Fitting a generalized linear model that included baseline, D30, and D90 values and testing the null hypothesis that the slope of scores differs between SPC and UC resulted in p=0.85. Using the Kaplan Meier method, no difference in survival was observed across arms (HR 1.13 [0.75-1.73]). Conclusions: Specialist-administered palliative care showed no meaningful improvement in QOL, nor a survival advantage, compared to usual care in frail, older and comorbid allo-HCT recipients, resulting in the cessation of this Phase II/III trial. Analysis of the whole patient population for primary and secondary outcomes is in progress. Clinical trial information: NCT03870750 . Change in FACT-BMT (D90 value minus baseline value) comparing the 4 arms of phase II. Group Mean difference (sd) Median difference (range) SPC (n=28) -2.93 (28.52) 0.25 (-102 to 38.22) CM (n=18) -18.37 (33.80) -9.50 (-98.33 to 11) SPC+CM (n=27) -15.76 (32.69) -7.67 (-90 to 32)

TPS2677 Background: Despite the success in hematologic malignancies, CAR T therapies face significant challenges in solid tumors due to the lack of tumor-specific targets that distinguish cancer from normal cells. EGFR plays a critical role in oncogenesis across several cancers and is often upregulated (TCGA 2022). While monoclonal antibodies targeting EGFR have demonstrated efficacy, these approaches are often limited by on-target, off-tumor toxicities, such as skin rash, which constrains dose escalation and efficacy (Macdonald, et al. J Am Acad Dermatol . 2015). A2B395 is an allogeneic, logic-gated, EGFR-targeted Tmod CAR T therapy designed to address these limitations and provide a convenient and consistent off-the-shelf option. This therapy incorporates 2 CARs: an activator targeting EGFR, and a blocker targeting HLA-A*02. The activator recognizes EGFR on both tumor and normal cells, while the blocker inhibits CAR T activity against normal cells with preserved HLA expression and decreases the risk for graft-versus-host disease (Hamburger, et al. Mol Immunol . 2020). To address potential host-vs-graft response, an shRNA expression module targeting B2M is included in the Tmod construct, which significantly reduces major histocompatibility complex class I levels and subsequent host immune response (DiAndreth, et al. Clin Immunol. 2022). Importantly, the Tmod system is modular and adaptable to multiple targets. Initial data on autologous Tmod CAR T therapy suggest reduced off-tumor toxicity and encouraging clinical efficacy (Grierson, et al. SITC 2024. Abstract 588). A2B395 represents a novel approach for EGFR-expressing solid tumors with HLA-A*02 LOH. Methods: DENALI-1 (NCT06682793) is a phase 1/2, open-label, nonrandomized study evaluating the safety and efficacy of A2B395 in adults. Patients are enrolled through BASECAMP-1 (NCT04981119), a master prescreening study that identifies patients with HLA LOH at any time in the course of their disease via next-generation sequencing (Tempus AI, Inc.). Key inclusion criteria include histologically confirmed recurrent unresectable, locally advanced, or metastatic cancers associated with EGFR expression, including colorectal, non-small cell lung, squamous cell head and neck, triple negative breast, and renal cell cancers. Patients must have received ≥1 line of prior therapy, such as a checkpoint inhibitor, molecular targeted therapy, or chemotherapy. The primary objective of phase 1 is to evaluate safety, tolerability, and the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) using a Bayesian optimal interval design for dose escalation. The dose-expansion phase will confirm RP2D and collect biomarker data. Phase 2 will assess overall response rate per RECIST v1.1. Clinical trial information: NCT06682793 .

Abstract Background. Sarcopenia (i.e. skeletal muscle loss) and physical frailty are significant contributors to adverse clinical outcomes in lung cancer patients. Nutritional intake and physical activity influence skeletal muscle mass and strength. We determined the impact of lung cancer on clinical outcomes in hospitalized patients with sarcopenia, frailty, or sarcopenia+frailty. Design. The Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) (years 2018-2020) from the United States was analyzed to study adult hospitalized patients with a diagnosis of lung cancer. Sarcopenia and frailty were defined by ICD10 codes that have been previously validated. Multivariate regression models were generated to determine the clinical impact of sarcopenia, frailty, or sarcopenia+frailty in patients with a diagnosis of lung cancer as compared to a general medical population (GMP) without lung cancer. Age was restricted to &gt;40 years old for both cohorts because lung cancer is rare in those less than 40 years old. Models were adjusted for age, race, sex, and comorbidities (cardiovascular disease, anemia, coagulopathy, HIV, depression, diabetes mellitus, and COPD). Results. Compared to the GMP (n=126,099), patients with lung cancer (n=241,913) were older (mean+SD age: 69.6+10.0 vs. 67.6+13.3 years, p&lt;0.001), and had a higher prevalence of sarcopenia (22.5% vs 9.0%, p&lt;0.001), frailty (53.4% versus 49.8%, p&lt;0.001), and sarcopenia+frailty (15.3% versus 6.8%, p&lt;0.001). COPD was common and found in 52.3% of lung cancer patients and 20.2% of the GMP. In lung cancer patients, the most common medical reasons for admission were sepsis, pneumonia, and COPD exacerbation. In GMP patients, the most common medical reasons for admission were sepsis, congestive heart failure, and acute kidney injury. In lung cancer patients, frailty had the greatest association with mortality (unadj OR 3.12, 95% CI: 3.02-3.23; adj OR 3.04, 95% CI: 2.91-3.17). Sarcopenia+frailty was most associated with greater healthcare utilization including greater healthcare cost (unadj OR 1.31, 95% CI: 1.29-1.32; adj OR 1.28, 95% CI: 1.26-1.30) and length of stay (unadj OR 1.57, 95% CI: 1.55-1.58; adj OR 1.50, 95% CI: 1.48-1.52). Sarcopenia+frailty were more likely to require additional healthcare facilities upon discharge and were the least likely to be discharged to home (unadj OR 0.32, 95% CI: 0.32-0.33; adj OR 0.35, 95% CI: 0.33-0.36). (see Table 1). Conclusion. While frailty was most associated with in-hospital mortality in lung cancer patients, sarcopenia+frailty was most associated with greater healthcare utilization. Our findings highlight the need to develop targeted interventions to improve clinical outcomes in lung cancer patients with sarcopenia and/or frailty.

Abstract Background. Sarcopenia (i.e. skeletal muscle loss) is a significant contributor to adverse clinical outcomes in patients with COPD. Nutritional intake and physical activity influence sarcopenia and frailty. There is increasing recognition that social determinants of health (SDOH) play critical roles in nutritional status. We evaluated the impact of SDOH on clinical outcomes in hospitalized patients with COPD and sarcopenia and/or frailty. Design. The Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) (years 2018-2020) was analyzed to study adult hospitalized patients with a primary diagnosis of COPD (J43, J44). SDOH was defined by ICD-10 Z-codes as a composite sum of problems related to housing and economic status, unemployment, occupation, psychosocial, family, and healthcare access. Sarcopenia and frailty were defined by a composite of ICD10 codes that have been previously validated in the literature. Multivariate regression models were generated to determine the impact of sarcopenia, frailty, and sarcopenia+frailty on clinical outcomes in COPD patients, which were adjusted for age, race, sex, SDOH, and comorbidities (cardiovascular disease, anemia, coagulopathy, HIV, depression, diabetes mellitus). Results. Of the 282,164 COPD patients that were analyzed, 7254 (2.6%) had codes related to SDOH, 21,035 (7.5%) had sarcopenia, 106,995 (37.9%) had frailty, and 11,293 (4%) had both sarcopenia and frailty. The predominant SDOH code was related to housing (70.9%) followed by social environment (11.5%). SDOH codes were more prevalent in patients with sarcopenia alone (3.6%), compared with frailty (2.5%) or sarcopenia+frailty (2.6%) (p&lt;0.001). When adjusted for demographics including age, race, and sex, SDOH was associated with greater odds of sarcopenia (adj OR 1.64, 95% CI: 1.51-1.79), frailty (adj OR 1.17, 95% CI: 1.11-1.24), and sarcopenia+frailty (adj OR 1.72; 95% CI: 1.54-1.90). COPD patients with sarcopenia+frailty had the greatest association with adverse clinical outcomes (i.e. in-hospital mortality, higher healthcare cost, and higher length of stay), followed by frailty alone, and sarcopenia alone (Table 1). Conclusion. In COPD patients, SDOH increased the odds for a diagnosis of sarcopenia, frailty, and sarcopenia+frailty. Sarcopenia+frailty had the greatest association with adverse outcomes in COPD patients, followed by frailty alone, and sarcopenia alone.