Citations

PURPOSE Remote symptom monitoring using patient-reported outcomes (PROs) has been shown to improve symptom control and physical function among patients with advanced cancer. However, it is unclear whether these benefits are similar across demographic groups. This exploratory analysis of the PRO-TECT trial examined whether the effects of electronic symptom monitoring varied by race, age, sex, and educational attainment. METHODS PRO-TECT was a cluster randomized trial conducted across 52 US community oncology practices comparing weekly electronic symptom monitoring with usual care (UC). Adult patients with metastatic solid tumors receiving systemic therapy were enrolled (N = 1,191). Participants in the PRO arm completed weekly symptom surveys including the PRO-CTCAE, triggering alerts to the care team for severe or worsening symptoms. Patients chose whether to complete weekly PROs online or via telephone-based interactive voice response not requiring Internet access. Outcomes were measured using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30 symptom control and physical function scales. Subgroup analyses were performed by race (Black v White), age (<65 v ≥65 years), sex (male v female), and educational attainment (≤high school v >high school). RESULTS From baseline to 3 months, PRO participants showed greater improvements in symptom control (+2.37 v −0.20, P = .002) and physical function (+1.54 v −0.93, P = .02) versus UC. Benefits were most pronounced among younger, female, Black, and less educated participants. Black participants in the PRO arm were more likely to report that symptom reporting made them feel more in control of their care compared with White participants. CONCLUSION Electronic symptom monitoring improved quality-of-life outcomes overall, including among groups who have historically experienced higher symptom burden or barriers to communication. Remote PRO systems may represent an equitable strategy to enhance cancer care delivery.

ABSTRACT Background and Objective Despite growing interest in mindfulness‐based interventions for adolescents with chronic pain, the data have not been systematically summarized. We conducted a systematic review and meta‐analyses to estimate the effect of mindfulness‐based interventions on pain intensity, catastrophizing, acceptance and interference; functioning, quality of life, and anxiety and depression in youth with chronic pain. Databases and Data Treatment Electronic databases CINAHL, CCTR, Embase, Medline, PsycINFO, Scopus and Web of Science were systematically searched to January 2, 2025. Studies were included if they were in English, included > 5 patients, were not part of intensive interdisciplinary pain treatment and included pre‐post outcomes from mindfulness‐based interventions delivered to adolescents with chronic pain. Risk of bias was assessed with the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale. Results Fourteen studies including a total of 323 adolescents were identified. There were significant within group improvements in pain intensity, pain catastrophizing, pain acceptance, pain interference, functioning, depression, anxiety, and quality of life, with results maintained or increased at follow‐up effect sizes at follow‐up were moderate to large (e.g., quality of life SMD = 0.33; pain intensity SMD = −0.73; pain interference SMD = −1.44). Heterogeneity of results was generally moderate to high. Compared to standardized long interventions, variable length interventions showed greater pre‐post changes in functioning, pain intensity, and pain catastrophizing. The certainty in the estimates was generally low, due to risk of bias and pre‐post designs. Conclusions Although adolescents with chronic pain report improvements after participating in mindfulness‐based interventions, rigorous RCTs are needed to substantiate these results. Significance Statement Chronic pain in youth is common and difficult to treat. Previous interventions have largely been based on cognitive‐behavioural therapy and not successful for all. This is the first systematic review and meta‐analysis in paediatric chronic pain to focus on mindfulness‐based interventions, highlighting an alternative and potentially effective intervention approach. This study informs clinicians about an effective intervention approach and assists researchers in identifying gaps for further research.

Background: The timing of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in patients with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) may critically impact clinical outcomes, yet the ideal surgical window remains unclear. We aimed to evaluate the association between time-to-CABG and in-hospital outcomes among NSTEMI admissions undergoing CABG. Methods: This retrospective cohort study utilized the US National Inpatient Sample database from 2017 to 2021 to evaluate the association between time-to-CABG and key in-hospital outcomes, including mortality, cardiac arrest, cardiogenic shock, ischemic stroke, acute kidney injury, and blood transfusion rates, while assessing length of stay (LOS) and hospital charges exclusively among survivors. Adult admissions with principal diagnosis of NSTEMI who underwent CABG without prior interhospital transfer were grouped by the calendar day of CABG from admission (0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and ≥7). Multivariate regression models were used to assess the outcomes across these eight groups. Results: Of 142,200 included admissions, same-day CABG (hospital day 0) was associated with the highest rates of in-hospital mortality, cardiac arrest, cardiogenic shock, and ischemic stroke. The adjusted odds of mortality, cardiac arrest, and cardiogenic shock were lower among admissions undergoing CABG between days 2 and 5. Likewise, the adjusted odds of ischemic stroke were lowest when CABG occurred on days 2 to 4. The odds of AKI increased when CABG was delayed beyond day 6, whereas blood transfusion rates showed no statistically significant association with time-to-CABG. Among survivors, LOS and hospital charges progressively increased with delayed CABGs. Conclusions: Among NSTEMI admissions undergoing CABG, CABG performed on hospital days 2 to 4 was associated with lower adjusted odds of several adverse in-hospital outcomes compared with same-day CABG. Further prospective studies are needed to validate these results and guide clinical decision-making.

Background/Objectives: KRAS G12C mutations define a clinically actionable subset of solid tumors, particularly non–small cell lung cancer. Clinical responses to approved covalent inhibitors remain limited by intrinsic and acquired resistance, highlighting the need for structurally distinct inhibitor scaffolds to expand therapeutic options. The objective of this study was to identify novel covalent binders targeting the KRAS G12C switch-II pocket through large-scale in silico screening and experimental validation. Methods: More than 1.9 million small molecules from diverse commercial libraries were screened using covalent docking, followed by multi-stage refinement incorporating molecular dynamics simulations, MM/GBSA free-energy estimation, and cancer-focused QSAR modeling. Results: This integrated workflow yielded 50 prioritized compounds spanning several chemically distinct scaffold classes. These candidates displayed favorable predicted binding energetics, stable ligand-protein interactions over extended simulation timescales, and low structural similarity to clinically approved KRAS G12C inhibitors sotorasib and adagrasib. Benchmarking against these clinical agents, using identical computational parameters, yielded comparable predicted binding energies for several candidate molecules. In cellular NanoBRET target-engagement assays, selected scaffolds, including K788-7251 and AN-989/14669131, exhibited sub-micromolar engagement of KRAS G12C with minimal endothelial cytotoxicity. Conclusions: Collectively, these findings identify structurally distinct, KRAS G12C inhibitor chemotypes and provide tractable starting points for the development of next-generation targeted therapies.

Importance Standard treatment for human papillomavirus (HPV)–associated oropharyngeal carcinoma (OPC) often includes 7 weeks of intensive chemoradiotherapy with substantial toxic effects. Lowering the radiation dose to gross disease may maintain cancer control with fewer toxic effects. Objective To evaluate long-term oncologic outcomes among patients with HPV-associated OPC treated with definitive deintensified (chemo)radiotherapy. Design, Setting, and Participants This cohort study evaluated consecutive patients treated with (chemo)radiotherapy between September 2014 and August 2022 at multiple institutions under one academic hospital system. Eligible patients had p16-positive OPC with a clinical stage from T0 to T3 and N0 to N2c (according to the American Joint Committee on Cancer [AJCC] Staging Manual, seventh edition ) and favorable smoking history. Data were analyzed between August 2023 and October 2025. Interventions Treatment was 60-Gy intensity-modulated radiotherapy with first-choice concurrent chemotherapy of weekly cisplatin, 30 mg/m 2 , or weekly cisplatin, 40 mg/m 2 . Patients with OPC with a clinical stage from T0 to T2 and N0 to N1 (according to AJCC, seventh edition ) were recommended 60-Gy radiotherapy alone. Main Outcomes and Measures Evaluation of locoregional recurrence was the primary outcome. Distant recurrence, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were secondary outcomes. Results A total of 240 patients received definitive deintensified (chemo)radiotherapy (207 receiving prospective protocol-adherent treatment and 33 receiving non–protocol-adherent treatment). Mean (SD) patient age was 60.3 (9.9) years (range, 33.0-84.0 years); 206 (85.8%) were male, and 34 (14.2%) were female. The cohort included 139 never smokers (57.9%) and 101 former smokers (42.1%) (median smoking history, 9.0 pack-years [range, 0.25-50.0 pack-years]). Concurrent chemotherapy was prescribed for 205 patients (85.4%), with 185 (77.1%) receiving cisplatin, and 165 (68.8%) receiving weekly cisplatin, 30 mg/m 2 . Median follow-up for surviving patients was 6.5 years (range, 0.44-11.0 years; 208 of 210 [99.0%] with minimum 2-year follow-up). Outcomes were as follows: 2-year OS was 97.9% (95% CI, 96.1%-99.7%), and 5-year OS, 92.4% (95% CI, 89.0%-96.0%); 2-year PFS, 94.1% (95% CI, 91.2%-97.2%), and 5-year PFS, 86.5% (95% CI, 82.1%-91.0%); 2-year locoregional recurrence, 1.3% (95% CI, −0.2% to 2.7%), and 5-year locoregional recurrence, 3.4% (95% CI, 1.1%-5.8%); 2-year distant recurrence, 4.6% (95% CI, 1.9%-7.3%), and 5-year distant recurrence, 7.3% (95% CI, 3.9%-10.7%). The median time to progression events was 1.9 years (range, 0.3-5.1 years); 12 of 26 recurrences (46.2%) occurred after 2 years. Thirty-three patients with low-risk disease (clinical stage T0-T2, N0-N1, according to AJCC, seventh edition ) received radiotherapy alone, which resulted in a 5-year PFS of 93.8%, with no patients experiencing a locoregional recurrence. Conclusions and Relevance In this cohort study, modest dose deintensification of 60-Gy radiotherapy in patients with HPV-associated OPC shows favorable rates of locoregional control. These findings provide support for ongoing investigations of deintensified radiotherapy.

Abstract Background: [212Pb]VMT-a-NET is a novel, next generation alpha therapy agent for advanced somatostatin receptor 2 positive (SSTR2+) neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). Here, we present safety and efficacy update from the dose-finding phase 1/2a clinical trial (NCT05636618). Methods: Adults with well-differentiated unresectable or metastatic NETs, who were peptide receptor radionuclide therapy-naïve, showed progressive disease after at least one prior line of systemic therapy and demonstrated SSTR2-expression on PET images were treated with up to four cycles of study therapy at the assigned dose level. Participants were followed for dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) observation up to 42 days after the first dose. Efficacy was evaluated by investigators according to RECIST criteria v1.1. Results: As of 10-Dec-2025 (data cut-off [DCO]) a total of 56 participants were enrolled into Cohorts 1, 2 and 3, and received at least 1 dose of [212Pb]VMT-a-NET (n=2 in Cohort 1, n=46 in Cohort 2, and n=8 in Cohort 3 at a dose level of 2.5 mCi, 5 mCi, and 6 mCi, respectively). For data analysis purposes, participants were categorized into two different groups: a safety group and an efficacy group. The safety group included all participants treated by the DCO (n=56), while the efficacy group included only the Cohort 1 participants (n=2) and the first half of participants treated in Cohort 2 (n=23). Among all participants treated with at least 1 dose of [212Pb]VMT-a-NET (n=56), no DLTs, no grade 5 adverse events (AEs), no treatment-related discontinuations, no serious renal complications, no dysphagia and no clinically significant treatment-related myelosuppression were observed. Median follow-up time for all patients treated was 40 weeks (range: 6-97). Among the 25 participants followed for efficacy (n=2 in Cohort 1 and n=23 in Cohort 2), 19 out of 25 were with no progression as of the DCO. Median follow-up time for participants included in the efficacy group was 49 weeks (range: 6-97). Investigator-assessed RECIST v1.1 objective responses were observed in 9 out of 23 participants (39%) enrolled in the first half of Cohort 2 (8 confirmed). The 2 patients enrolled in Cohort 1 at 2.5 mCi still have stable disease after 2 years of follow up. Updated safety outcomes for all participants along with updated efficacy findings for participants in Cohorts 1 and 2 with sufficient maturity will be presented during the congress. Conclusions: Treatment with [212Pb]VMT-α-NET continues to be well-tolerated among all patients treated (n=56), and to show promising efficacy at the dose levels of 2.5 mCi and 5 mCi. The study is ongoing with Cohort 3 (6 mCi) currently open for enrollment. Citation Format: Thorvardur R. Halfdanarson, Richard L. Wahl, Vineeth Sukrithan, Brandon R. Mancini, Seyed A. Mosallaie, Savitha Balaraman, Gregory S. Sibley, Jason Starr, Lowell B. Anthony, Chih Y. Liao, Samuel H. Mehr, Jared Weiss, Robert A. Ramirez, Lucia Baratto, Wenjing Yang, Alaa Hanna, Stephen M. Keefe, Markus Puhlmann, Vikas Prasad. [212Pb]VMT-a-NET in advanced SSTR2+ neuroendocrine tumors: safety and preliminary efficacy results from dose-finding cohorts 1,2 and 3 [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 2 (Late-Breaking, Clinical Trial, and Invited Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(8_Suppl):Abstract nr CT088.

Abstract Background: Zedoresertib (zedo) and lunresertib (lunre) are oral, highly selective WEE1 and PKMYT1 inhibitors, respectively. Inhibition of these targets leads to premature mitotic entry, and in the presence of high replication stress causes mitotic catastrophe. In preclinical models, the combination of the zedo and lunre is synthetically lethal, supporting this first-in-class trial combination (NCT04855656). Methods: In this Phase 1 trial, patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors with CCNE1 amplification (amp), or FBXW7 or PPP2R1A deleterious mutations (mut) were treated with zedo (daily dosing) plus lunre (3 days on/4 days off), guided by preclinical modelling of the pharmacological contributions of WEE1 and PKMYT1 inhibition in achieving tumor regression. Objectives included safety, tolerability, recommended doses (RD), pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PDy), antitumor activity and molecular response rate (MRR; ≥50% decline in circulating tumor DNA). Results: As of 18 Nov 2025, 54 pts (55.6% female ; prior lines of therapy 1 - 9, main cancer types: ovarian (OC) (35.2%), colorectal (31.5%), pancreatic (7.4%) and breast (5.6%)) were treated at 5 dose levels (DL) from 150 mg to 260 mg of zedo plus 60 mg or 80 mg of lunre. The most common ≥G3 treatment related adverse events (TRAEs) were anemia (9.3%), neutropenia (7.4%) and Palmar Plantar Erythrodysesthesia (PPE) (7.4%). There were no G5 TRAEs. 4 (9.3%) of 54 pts had a dose-limiting toxicity (G3 pain in extremity and G1 rash in same pt (zedo 150 mg / lunre 60 mg), G3 rash (200 mg / 80 mg), G3 PPE (260 mg / 60 mg), G3 vomiting (260 mg / 60 mg)). PK/PDy analyses showed dose-dependent exposures for both zedo and lunre and target engagement in most pts, with reductions in pCDK1 Thr14 and Tyr15 and yH2AX induction. 24 (55.5%) of 44 RECIST v1.1 evaluable pts showed tumor shrinkage (3 cCR, 5 uPR, 15 SD and 1 PD). Of 16 evaluable pts with advanced OC (12 platinum resistant , 2 unknown and 2 platinum sensitive) with CCNE1 amp (13 pts) or FBXW7 mut (3 pts), 13 (81.3%) showed tumor shrinkage (3 cCR, 3 uPR and 7 SD); clinical benefit rate (pts with CR, PR or SD) was 93.8%; 7 (43.8%) OC pts were on treatment for at least 16 weeks; 4 (25%) OC pts achieved GCIG CA-125 responses. Of 23 pts with a post baseline ctDNA analysis, a MRR of 39% was seen across all DLs. Conclusion: We report the first disclosure of clinical data of the first-in-field synthetic lethal combination of WEE1 and PKMYT1 inhibitors in a molecularly defined pt population. The safety profile of zedo and lunre was expected and manageable. Promising antitumor activity was observed in pts with CCNE1 amp or FBXW7 mut solid tumors, especially pts with OC. Further dose optimization of this combination is ongoing. Citation Format: Timothy A. Yap, Rahul Aggarwal, Elisa Fontana, Martin Hojgaard, Benedito A. Carneiro, Linda Duska, Patricia LoRusso, Siddhartha Yadav, Stephanie Lheureux, Cara Mathews, Ryan H. Moy, Nehal Lakhani, Mia Weiss, Joan Tymon-Rosario, Gerardo Colon-Otero, Ignacio Garrido-Laguna, Elisabeth K. Lee, Esteban Rodrigo Imedio, Jonathan Wessen, Luke Piggott, Vito Dozio, Noemie Luong, Christophe Mas, Alison M. Schram. First data disclosure of the Phase I trial of the first in class combination of WEE1 inhibitor zedoresertib with PKMYT1 inhibitor lunresertib in patients with advanced solid tumors harboring CCNE1, FBXW7, or PPP2R1A genomic alterations [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 2 (Late-Breaking, Clinical Trial, and Invited Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(8_Suppl):Abstract nr CT022.

Background: Stable osteochondritis dissecans (OCD) lesions are primarily treated nonoperatively. Nonoperative treatment includes several recommendations, including the use of an unloader brace. However, little is known about the clinical effectiveness of unloader bracing and its influence on OCD healing, return to sports, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs). The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate the impact of unloader bracing on patients with stable medial femoral condyle (MFC) OCD lesions treated nonoperatively. Purpose: To investigate the influence of valgus unloader bracing on the success of treating stable MFC OCD with nonoperative treatment strategies. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. Methods: The authors used a prospective cohort of patients receiving nonoperative care for stable MFC knee OCD lesions. The primary variable of interest was the efficacy of bracing. The primary outcomes were transition from nonoperative care to surgical intervention, return-to-play (RTP) clearance, and PROs. Bivariate testing was used to determine if there were differences between groups. Chi-square testing was used to determine if there were differences in rates of transition to surgery by group. The timing of the transition by each group was assessed using a Wilcoxon rank-sum test, given the nonparametric nature of the data. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to calculate time at risk, incidence rate, and survival times for each group. Results: A total of 185 knees (bracing group: 123 [66.5%] knees; no-bracing group: 62 [33.5%] knees) were analyzed. Overall, 142 (76.8%) knees were successfully treated nonoperatively. Transition to surgery occurred in 43 (23.2%) knees. There were no differences in transition to surgery by groups, with no differences seen by group. Of the knees that did not transition to surgical care, 65 (71.4%) in the bracing group and 38 (74.5%) in the no-bracing group received RTP clearance ( P = .693). PRO scores were similar between the 2 groups at the time of RTP clearance. Conclusion: The inclusion of an unloader brace in the nonoperative treatment for stable MFC OCD lesions did not decrease the likelihood of patients undergoing surgical intervention or improve their PRO scores at the time of RTP clearance. Registration: NCT02771496 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier).

Abstract Neuroblastoma (NB) accounts for 10% of pediatric cancer-related deaths. High-risk NB is frequently metastatic at diagnosis and has a poor 5-year survival rate (&lt;50%) despite aggressive treatment. GD2, a disialoganglioside glycolipid that is expressed in nearly all NBs, has been validated as a promising immunotherapy target. Although GD2-CAR-T cells have been clinically evaluated, their efficacy has been limited by poor tumor infiltration and the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME), highlighting the need for alternative immune-based strategies. With inherent capacity of macrophages to infiltrate tumors, phagocytose cancer cells, and modulate TME, they represent a promising alternative strategy for immunotherapy in NB. In this study, we developed and evaluated GD2-CAR-macrophages (GD2-CAR-Ms) as a novel therapeutic approach for NB. GD2-specific CAR constructs were designed, validated, and introduced into multiple human and murine monocyte/macrophage cell lines via lentiviral transduction. Fluorescent microscopy and flow cytometry confirmed a significant enhancement in the phagocytosis of GD2-high NB cells by GD2-CAR-Ms containing Hu3F8 single-chain variable fragment (scFv). A strong positive correlation was observed between GD2 expression levels on the target cells and phagocytosis efficiency of GD2-CAR-Ms, indicating that the phagocytic activity of GD2-CAR-Ms is antigen-specific. Anti-tumor efficacy was further evaluated in vivo using an immunocompetent Mycn-expressing NB non-genetically engineered mouse model (MYCN-NGEMM). Mice treated with GD2-CAR-Ms exhibited significantly reduced tumor burden and prolonged survival compared to control groups. Notably, treatment of mice bearing GD2-high tumors resulted in markedly improved survival, including one complete remission among ten treated animals, underscoring the therapeutic potential of GD2-targeted macrophage therapy. Histological analysis showed increased deposition of connective tissues and decreased tumor cells density, suggesting TME remodeling. Furthermore, immunohistochemistry reveals increased immune cell infiltration, particularly of macrophages, neutrophils and T cells, indicating a favorable shift in the immune TME from “cold” to “hot” following GD2-CAR-M treatment. Additionally, inhibition of tumor growth was also observed in our zebrafish NB model after GD2-CAR-Ms treatment, further supporting their therapeutic potential. Together, our findings demonstrate that GD2-CAR-Ms exhibit potent antitumor activity and reshape the tumor immune microenvironment, supporting their translational potential as a therapeutic strategy for high-risk NB. Citation Format: Ke-En Tan, Kok Siong Yeo, Cheng Zhang, Caleb Baker, Shyang Hong Tan, Alexis M. Sosic, Yat-Yuen Lim, Choong-Yong Ung, Cristina Correia, Stephanie F. Polites, Yi Lin, William A. Weiss, Hu Li, Shizhen Zhu. Engineering macrophages as a novel therapeutic approach for high-risk neuroblastoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(7 Suppl):Abstract nr 7810.

Abstract Purpose Consensus recommendations and guidelines for reporting quantitative research in health professions education (HPE) research are lacking. This study synthesizes available quantitative reporting recommendations and guidelines to present a harmonized framework and derive quantitative standards for reporting HPE research. Method The authors identified existing standards, recommendations, and guidelines from peer-reviewed scientific journals in medicine, education, and social sciences by searching PubMed, Web of Science, and Google from August 2006 through April 2025. The authors also requested input from experts in HPE (scholars and journal editors) via electronic communication over 6 months (November 2024 to April 2025). The articles identified were then used to synthesize and generate an initial list of standards for reporting quantitative research in HPE. Two authors reviewed each article to rate its alignment with HPE research. All authors independently evaluated the full list of standards and discussed them as a group for their relevance and alignment for reporting in HPE; all authors also made recommendations for each standard (to report as is, report but modify, or drop). The group subsequently reviewed and collectively reached consensus on the final set of quantitative reporting standards. Results The authors reviewed a total of 34 articles, with 19 identified as having alignment with HPE quantitative research standards. Mean interrater agreement among author pairs was 98% (kappa = .96). Authors initially generated 40 reporting standards, of which 18 (45%) were modified and 1 (3%) was identified to be dropped. The final set of quantitative guidelines consisted of 39 standards, with each standard nested in one of 28 topic areas. Conclusions The quantitative reporting standards identified in this study provide guidance to ensure rigor in reporting expectations for HPE research. These standards may also facilitate critical appraisal of articles and enhance the quality and impact of quantitative HPE research.