Citations

Abstract Background Recurrent pericarditis (RP) is an IL-1-mediated chronic autoinflammatory disease (1,2). The phase 3 trial RHAPSODY demonstrated that rilonacept (IL-1α and IL-1β cytokine trap), the first and only FDA-approved treatment for RP, was effective in treating RP not only as a third-line agent (3L; after corticosteroids) but also as a second-line agent (2L; instead of corticosteroids) and reduced recurrence risk as monotherapy (3). The REgiStry Of the NAtural history of recurreNt periCarditis in pEdiatric and adult patients (RESONANCE) has been collecting long-term combined prospective and retrospective data from US-based pericardial-disease-dedicated programs since 2020 (4). Purpose To assess the efficacy of rilonacept in RP in a real-world setting, extending the clinical trial findings of RHAPSODY. Methods Database cut-off (DCO) was 05 February 2025. Data on RP management were collected and analyzed from pts with ≥2 years of observation in RESONANCE. Disease duration at DCO was defined as time from RP diagnosis to either disease resolution (no disease flares while off all RP treatments for ≥6 months before DCO) or last follow-up (for pts with ongoing treatment at DCO). Pericarditis recurrences (investigator-assessed) were confirmed based on RP symptom data and/or objective findings. Annualized recurrence rates were calculated per RP treatment regimen as total pericarditis recurrences divided by total patient-years (PY) while receiving that treatment. Wilcoxon signed-rank test was utilized to analyze the significance in change of annualized recurrence rates before and after rilonacept initiation. Results At DCO, 81 pts had ≥2 years of follow-up data in RESONANCE; mean (SD) age was 51.0 (16.8) years; most (66.7%) were female; 84% had idiopathic etiology; median (Q1-Q3) disease duration was 3.1 (2.6-3.7) years; and median observation was 2.93 (2.54-3.38) years. Patient-year treatment exposures per treatment were: NSAIDS ± colchicine (n=79; 187.8 PY), corticosteroids (n=30; 61.1 PY), anakinra (n=1; 1.2 PY) and rilonacept (n=35; 72.8 PY). Of the 35 pts treated with rilonacept for any duration (median observation: 3.2 years; median time on rilonacept: 2.08 years), the most common reason for rilonacept initiation was chest pain/recurrence on prior treatment (n=28). The annualized recurrence rate while receiving rilonacept was significantly lower versus all combined prior lines of treatment (4.00 vs. 0.02 events per PY; p=0.002); this outcome was consistent across line of treatment for rilonacept use (2L: 3.73 vs. 0.06 events per PY, p=0.02; 3L: 4.14 vs. 0 events per PY, p<0.001; Table 1). Conclusions This first report of real-world outcomes from RESONANCE shows that rilonacept-containing regimens for RP as 1st, 2nd, or 3rd line therapy reduced recurrence risk over long- term (>2 year) treatment, supporting prolonged management during RP natural history.

Abstract Background Nearly 40,000 people in the U.S. experience recurrent pericarditis with up to 90% of cases having no identifiable cause, often making the journey to diagnosis arduous. Understanding the challenges that patients and health care professionals (HCP) face will help address gaps and barriers in patient diagnosis and care. In addition, the lack of U.S. based guidelines for recurrent pericarditis clinical care, coupled with the time lapse from the last published European guideline, has created an opportunity to discover workflow solutions for U.S. based healthcare professionals. Purpose The American Heart Association’s (AHA) Addressing Recurrent Pericarditis Initiative is a three-year effort utilizing a quality improvement approach to address gaps/barriers in patient care, educate HCPs, and develop patient education resources to improve diagnosis, treatment, and quality of life. To accomplish this, the lived experiences and challenges patients face on their journey to diagnosis was integrated into the qualitative research process. Methods To assess quality improvement opportunities, the AHA engaged HCPs with recurrent pericarditis experience from 15 diverse health systems to participate in a learning collaborative strategy for quality improvement and implementation to share successful strategies, provide input on professional education topics, and participate in process mapping. Data collection strategies include 1:1 consultations, quarterly learning collaborative calls, surveys and questionnaire completion. To assess patient education needs, the AHA Market Research Team held 1-hour video interviews with ten diverse patients. Results AHA-led HCP interviews produced process maps of clinical workflows and identified opportunities for standardization to improve clinical workflow and patient outcomes (Figure 1). From these data collection methods, preliminary results include care coordination across clinical settings, exploring treatment options, standardization of follow-up cadence, and provider awareness of misdiagnoses/underdiagnosis rates. The patient interviews revealed that there is a lack of symptom recognition, persistent rate of misdiagnosis, delay in accurate diagnosis and treatment, and discrepancies in diagnosis and treatment for various demographics including female and younger adult patients (Figure 2). Conclusion(s) In Year 2 of this three-year initiative, we will continue to refine identified areas of opportunities to improve patient outcomes by creating and disseminating educational materials and launch awareness campaigns, while also producing a national education series for HCPs that provide guidance for system-level quality improvement to emphasize consistency in care and reductions in health inequities. Key findings from this study highlight the care coordination involved in the treatment of patients with recurrent pericarditis and the need to provide multidiscipline educational approaches to achieve this goal.Figure. 1 Summary of care pathway Figure. 2 Summary of patient interviews

Abstract Metabolic disorders such as obesity, type 2 diabetes, and dyslipidaemia are major drivers of cardiovascular risk and have reached epidemic levels in Western populations. Recent advances in clinical research have uncovered unexpected and often beneficial effects of pharmacological classes of metabolic drugs on cardiovascular outcomes, revealing complex interactions between metabolism and cardiac pathology. Despite their clinical efficacy, the molecular and cellular mechanisms through which many of these agents act remain only partially understood. This gap in knowledge underscores the urgent need for fundamental research that not only dissects the biology of metabolic disorders and cardiovascular disease but also reveals the mechanistic basis of existing and emerging therapies, thereby enabling rational therapeutic development. This scientific statement, developed by researchers from the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Council on Basic Cardiovascular Science and several ESC Working Groups, provides a state-of-the-art overview of the emerging molecular and cellular pathways linking metabolic abnormalities with vascular and cardiac disease. By illuminating these critical connections and unresolved questions, this article aims to catalyse innovation in the prevention and management of cardiovascular disease in the context of metabolic dysfunction and to suggest new directions for future research.

PURPOSE There is growing scientific interest in incorporating patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in early phase dose-finding oncology trials (DFOTs) to assess tolerability, inform dose selection, and guide later stage trial design. However, research indicates that PRO objectives in DFOTs are often unclear. The Incorporating Patient-Reported Outcomes in Dose-Finding Trials-Research Objectives Recommendations (OPTIMISE-ROR) project was established to support trialists to effectively incorporate PROs into DFOTs. METHODS Using the Enhancing Quality and Transparency of Health Research (EQUATOR) Network's methodological framework, guideline development included the following: (1) a methodological review of published DFOTs incorporating PROs; (2) candidate item generation, refined through expert consultation; (3) a two-round international multistakeholder Delphi survey (N = 109 in Round 1 [October 2024]; N = 96 in Round 2 [December 2024]); and (4) an independently chaired virtual consensus meeting (N = 31; January 2025) where multidisciplinary, international experts reviewed and voted to finalize items for inclusion. RESULTS Consensus was reached on six recommendations emphasizing three core PRO tolerability concepts: overall side effect impact, symptomatic adverse events, and overall health-related quality of life. The integration of PROs to inform final dose recommendations in dose escalation and optimization trials should be considered, regardless of trial design. The recommendations highlight the importance of PRO data analysis over time and across dose levels, defining PRO research objectives as descriptive or statistically powered, and assessing PRO-related end points to guide end point selection for subsequent studies. CONCLUSION This foundational guidance outlines key PRO research objectives in DFOTs. By facilitating the systematic integration of PROs, this guidance supports the utilization of patient-centered evidence for the tolerability and efficacy assessment of therapies to inform dose escalation, optimization, and regulatory evaluation—ultimately contributing to the development of safer, more effective therapies.

Abstract Purpose: Rearranged during transfection (RET) alterations are oncogenic drivers across solid tumors. Selective RET inhibitors (SRI) selpercatinib and pralsetinib have transformed outcomes for patients with RET-altered malignancies. Limited knowledge exists on genomic mechanisms of resistance to SRI. Experimental Design: We established “RETgistry,” a global consortium of patients with advanced RET-altered solid tumors who received SRI and underwent postprogression tissue or plasma biopsies assessed by next-generation sequencing. Frequencies of secondary RET resistance mutations and acquired non-RET gene alterations were determined. Progression-free survival (PFS) and time to treatment discontinuation (TTD) on first SRI were estimated with the Kaplan–Meier method. Results: RETgistry included 109 patients with RET-altered advanced solid tumors (lung, n = 94; thyroid, n = 15) who underwent 143 post-SRI progression biopsies (tissue, 91; plasma, 52). The median PFS and TTD were 13.9 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 10.1–16.6] and 17.3 months (95% CI, 14–20.2), respectively. Secondary RET mutations were detected in 20 (14%) biopsies [lung cancer, 15 (12.4%) and thyroid carcinoma, 5 (22.7%)]. Common acquired off-target alterations involved MET (18.2%; amplification, 15%), TP53 (8.2%), APC (7.6%), KRAS (7.1%), KEAP1 (5.9%), and CDKN2A/B (5.3%). MET alterations were enriched in post-SRI versus pre-SRI specimens (full cohort, 17.6% vs. 2.0%, P = 0.022; lung cancer, 19.1% vs. 2.1%, P = 0.022). Conclusions: The prevalence of secondary RET mutations after SRI was low, underscoring a greater role for off-target resistance. Recurrent acquired alterations involving tumor suppressor genes or upstream regulators of MAPK and PI3K pathways were identified, most commonly MET amplification. Continued efforts to characterize SRI resistance biology are critical to guide the development of novel therapeutic strategies.

Abstract Aims Left bundle branch block (LBBB) is associated with mechanical dyssynchrony, heterogeneous perfusion, and adverse left ventricular (LV) remodeling. However, not all patients with LBBB develop cardiomyopathy, and dyssynchrony can occur without conduction defects. The role of microvascular dysfunction remains uncertain. We aimed to assess how mechanical dyssynchrony and perfusion heterogeneity relate to LV remodeling and function in patients with and without LBBB. Methods and results We retrospectively analyzed 233 patients with isolated LBBB and 932 matched controls who underwent PET myocardial perfusion imaging, assessing mechanical dyssynchrony (phase entropy), myocardial blood flow (MBF), coronary vascular resistance (CVR), myocardial flow reserve (MFR), septal-to-lateral MBF ratio (SLR) for perfusion heterogeneity, LV volumes, and ejection fraction (EF). Compared to controls, patients with LBBB had greater dyssynchrony (56% vs. 40%), larger LV volumes, and lower EF (54% vs. 67%) (all p <0.001), and had higher stress CVR (37 vs. 34 mmHg/mL·min⁻¹·g⁻¹), lower stress MBF (2.4 vs. 2.6 mL/min/g), reduced MFR (2.4 vs. 2.6), and lower SLR (0.95 vs. 1.00) (all p <0.05). Among patients with dyssynchrony, SLR<1.0 identified those with more adverse remodeling. In multivariable regression, phase entropy and SLR independently predicted LV volumes and EF, with adverse effects of SLR reduction amplified in LBBB (interaction p <0.01). In the Cox proportional hazards analysis, phase entropy (HR:1.02, p =0.01), MFR (HR:0.62, p <0.001), and LVEF (HR:0.97, p <0.001) were independently associated with mortality and heart failure hospitalization, whereas LBBB was not. Conclusions Mechanical dyssynchrony and perfusion heterogeneity independently predict adverse LV remodeling, irrespective of LBBB. Integrated imaging enhances cardiomyopathy stratification.

ABSTRACT Introduction Positron emission tomography (PET) myocardial flow reserve (MFR) is a robust indicator of coronary vascular health and a strong predictor of cardiovascular risk. Clinical guidelines typically use fixed MFR thresholds (e.g., <2.0) to stratify risk, yet this approach overlooks individual variation, particularly by age and sex. We aimed to establish age- and sex-adjusted MFR percentiles and to evaluate their prognostic and predictive performance for cardiovascular risk assessment, in comparison with conventional fixed-threshold MFR approach. Methods Using data from the REFINE PET registry (24,820 patients from 12 sites), we measured PET MFR and derived age- and sex-adjusted MFR reference percentiles using quantile regression in patients without known coronary artery disease. All patients were categorized into percentile-based quartile groups. The primary outcome for prognostic and prediction analyses was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), defined as all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, or heart-failure hospitalization. Time-to-event associations were evaluated using covariate-adjusted survival models, with cumulative incidence and hazard ratios (HR) estimated at 1 and 5 years in the derivation dataset, an independent but similar validation dataset A, and a high-risk validation dataset B. Predictive performance for MACE was assessed using discrimination, calibration, and reclassification metrics, comparing percentile-based models with models using a fixed MFR threshold (<2.0). Results Among participants (mean age 66.5 years; median follow-up 3.6 years), age- and sex-adjusted MFR quartile groups were strong independent predictors of MACE, with adjusted HR increasing stepwise across quartile groups at both early and later follow-up. At 1 year, HR (95% CI) comparing the lowest to the highest quartile group were 4.06 (3.41–4.82) in the derivation cohort, 3.31 (2.32–4.71) in validation cohort A, and 2.35 (2.05–2.70) in validation cohort B. At 5 years, the corresponding HR were 2.18 (1.86–2.56), 1.77 (1.31–2.40), and 1.59 (1.36–1.86). Percentile-based models demonstrated consistently higher discrimination, better calibration, and greater net reclassification for MACE at both time points compared with fixed-threshold MFR models. Although 67.2% of patients had preserved MFR (>2.0), cardiovascular risk increased steadily across MFR percentiles even within this range. Conclusion Age- and sex-adjusted MFR percentiles provide a reliable, clinically actionable measure of vascular health, improving cardiovascular risk stratification by better capturing age- and sex-related heterogeneity in vascular risk. Compared with traditional fixed-threshold approaches, MFR percentiles demonstrate improved predictive performance for cardiovascular risk assessment across diverse patient populations. CLINICAL PERSPECTIVE What is new? In a large, multinational real-world registry of more than 24,000 patients undergoing PET MPI, we derived age- and sex-adjusted myocardial flow reserve (MFR) percentiles, establishing a lifespan-based reference framework with age-specific reference values. Age- and sex-adjusted MFR percentiles showed a strong, graded association with 1- and 5-year cardiovascular risk and demonstrated improved prognostic and predictive performance compared with fixed MFR thresholds and models without MFR across independent derivation and validation datasets, including a higher-risk cohort. Lower adjusted MFR percentiles were consistently associated with higher risk of major adverse cardiovascular events, including all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, and heart-failure hospitalization. What are the clinical implications? Age- and sex-adjusted MFR percentiles provide a personalized, dynamic measure of coronary vascular health that improves cardiovascular risk stratification by accounting for age- and sex-related heterogeneity. A percentile-based approach may help clinicians better identify patients at elevated cardiovascular risk who may warrant closer monitoring or intensified preventive strategies, while avoiding unnecessary intervention in lower-risk individuals. By integrating macrovascular and microvascular dysfunction, age- and sex-adjusted MFR percentiles offer a clinically interpretable marker of vascular aging that may inform future research on aging biomarkers, novel therapeutics and cardiovascular risk assessment across the spectrum of atherosclerotic and microvascular disease.

Background/Objective: The COVID-19 pandemic led to a widespread transition to online learning. Yet, it is unclear how this shift in learning format impacted school attendance in adolescents with chronic pain, a group that struggles with school absenteeism. This study compared school attendance and format (e.g., in-person, online) in patients with chronic pain attending an Intensive Interdisciplinary Pain Treatment Program (IIPT) before the pandemic to an age- and gender-matched sample of youth attending the program after the pandemic. Methods: Participants were 226 school aged adolescents (13–18 years; M age = 15.89, SD = 1.46) enrolled in an IIPT before and after the COVID-19 pandemic. Patients admitted before March 2020 (pre-pandemic group; n = 113) were compared to an age- and gender-matched group of patients who were admitted to the IIPT from November 2021 to November 2023 (post-pandemic group = 113). Upon admission to the program, participants completed validated measures of internalizing symptoms and functional disability. They also completed structured questions related to pain and school history. Results: Significantly more patients in the post-pandemic group were attending school through online and home-schooling options (p < 0.01). Youth who attended the IIPT after the pandemic missed fewer school days (p < 0.05) than those who attended before the pandemic. The groups did not differ in functional disability or internalizing symptoms. However, participants in the post-pandemic group who attended online school missed more school days (p < 0.01) and experienced greater functional disability (p < 0.05) than those who attended in person. Conclusions: The findings highlight how the COVID-19 pandemic may lead to sustained changes in the way adolescents with chronic pain attend school, with implications for increased functional disability and school dropout among this vulnerable population.

Importance The choice of induction agent during rapid sequence intubation (RSI) of critically ill adults may affect clinical outcomes. Although ketamine and etomidate are frequently used for RSI, their comparative effectiveness remains controversial. Objective To compare the safety of etomidate vs ketamine for emergency RSI in critically ill adults. Design, Setting, and Participants This cohort study used a target trial emulation with observational data collected between March 1, 2022, and April 30, 2024, from 18 emergency departments across Brazil, with data from the Brazilian Airway Registry Cooperation. Adults who underwent RSI and received either etomidate or ketamine as a sole hypnotic agent were included; those with preintubation cardiac arrest or immediate postintubation transfer were excluded. Exposure Administration of etomidate or ketamine as the induction agent for RSI. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was 28-day in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included 7-day in-hospital mortality, first-attempt intubation success, and major adverse events (new hemodynamic instability, severe hypoxemia, and cardiac arrest) within 30 minutes after intubation. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to adjust for confounding. Risk ratios (RRs) and risk differences (RDs) with 95% CIs were used to compare outcomes between groups. Results Among 1810 patients (median age, 64 years [IQR, 50-74 years]; 1048 men [57.9%]), 514 received ketamine and 1296 received etomidate. The median shock index was higher in the ketamine group than the etomidate group (0.81 [IQR, 0.65-1.01] vs 0.76 [IQR, 0.59-0.99]), and preintubation vasopressor use was more common in the ketamine group than the etomidate group (191 of 514 [37.2%] vs 391 of 1296 [30.2%]). Weighted 28-day mortality was higher with etomidate than ketamine (60.5% [95% CI, 57.2%-63.8%] vs 54.4% [95% CI, 45.0%-63.9%]; RR, 1.14 [95% CI, 1.03-1.27]; RD, 7.6% [95% CI, 2.0%-13.3%]). Seven-day mortality was also higher with etomidate than ketamine (35.2% [95% CI, 32.0%-38.3%] vs 30.1% [95% CI, 23.5%-36.7%]; RR, 1.19 [95% CI, 1.04-1.35]). New hemodynamic instability within 30 minutes after intubation was more frequent with ketamine (24.2% [95% CI, 20.4%-28.0%] vs 18.9% [95% CI, 16.7%-21.0%]; RR, 0.78 [0.64-0.95]). There were no statistically significant differences in the other secondary outcomes. Conclusions and Relevance In this cohort study of critically ill adults undergoing RSI, etomidate use was associated with higher in-hospital mortality at 7 and 28 days compared with ketamine. These findings highlight the need for definitive randomized clinical trials to compare both agents.

Abstract Background Acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is a major cause of non-relapse mortality (NRM) after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). High-dose steroids are standard first-line therapy for grade II–IV acute GVHD, whereas systemic treatment (tx) is generally not recommended for grade I. However, in practice many patients (pts) with grade I GVHD receive systemic steroids. A prior GITMO randomized trial (n=173) of grade I GVHD to either systemic steroid tx or “watch and wait” found that preemptive steroid tx reduced progression to grade II but not grade III/IV GVHD, increased serious infections, and resulted in similar chronic GVHD, NRM and survival (Bacigalupo, Haematologica 2017). In this study we analyzed real world evidence for early systemic steroid use and the potential impact of serum biomarkers in grade I GVHD. Methods We analyzed clinical data and serum samples from pts with grade I acute GVHD at 24 Mount Sinai Acute GVHD International Consortium (MAGIC) centers between 2014 and 2022 who were treated according to physician discretion. Pts were divided into a preemptive steroid tx group or a watch-and-wait group (systemic steroids administered only if progression to grade II–IV GVHD). Preemptive steroid use was treated as a time-dependent covariate and a frailty proportional hazards model with random effects was used to adjust for center effects to account for possible heterogeneity in clinical practices across transplant centers. Serum samples collected at the diagnosis of grade I GVHD were analyzed for ST2 and REG3α to calculate validated Ann Arbor (AA) scores (1, 2, 3). Results Grade I GVHD was diagnosed in 1143 pts; 591 (52%) received preemptive tx and 552 (48%) were treated by a watch-and-wait strategy. In the preemptive tx group, steroids were initiated at a median of 0 days and within 7 days for &gt;90%. The median initial dose of steroids was 1 mg/kg of prednisone or its equivalent. In the watch and wait group, only 184 pts (33%) required systemic steroids for progression to grade II-IV GVHD at a median of 14 days from grade I diagnosis. Preemptive steroid tx reduced the risk of grade II–IV acute GVHD (HR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.56–0.89; P=0.003), but not the risk of grade III/IV acute GVHD (HR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.69–1.52; P=0.899) or chronic GVHD (HR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.69–1.52; P=0.899), consistent with the GITMO trial. The 12-month incidence of NRM was higher for preemptive tx vs. watch and wait (13% vs 7%, P=0.002). In multivariate analysis preemptive steroid use independently predicted an increased risk of NRM (HR, 1.63; 95% CI, 1.06–2.50; P=0.026) as did several other known risk factors (older recipient age, umbilical cord blood donor, HCT-CI ≥3, and myeloablative conditioning). Greater NRM in the preemptive tx group was driven primarily by 3-fold more infectious deaths; deaths due to uncontrolled GVHD were similar for both tx groups. The risk for relapse was unexpectedly lower in the preemptive tx group (HR 0.64; 95% CI 0.47-0.88; P=0.006) and overall survival was therefore not different between groups, but risk factors for relapse such as minimal residual disease status were not available precluding further analysis of this finding. Serum was collected in 871 (76%) pts at onset of grade I GVHD for retrospective biomarker analysis. AA scores were AA1 (80%), AA2 (15%), and AA3 (5%). AA scores were highly predictive of progression to grade III/IV GVHD (AA1 vs AA2 vs AA3: 9% vs 14% vs 44%, all P&lt;0.001) and the risk of 12-month NRM (8% vs 16% vs 39%, all P&lt;0.001); this pattern was observed in both tx groups. The negative effect of preemptive steroid tx was most pronounced in pts with grade I/AA1 GVHD who experienced 5-fold more infectious related deaths compared to pts managed with a watch and wait approach. Conclusion Treatment of grade I GVHD with systemic steroids did not reduce the incidence of grade III/IV GVHD or deaths due to uncontrolled GVHD and instead increased the risk of NRM from infections compared to pts who were treated only after GVHD progressed. Importantly, 2/3 of the watch and wait pts never needed systemic steroid tx. These findings remained robust after adjusting for multiple confounders, including center effects, and were consistent with the GITMO trial. MAGIC biomarkers at the onset of grade I GVHD predicted outcomes and a watch and wait strategy may be best for the 80% of pts with AA1 GVHD. Better treatment options are needed for the 20% of pts with grade I and AA2/3 GVHD.