Citations

Introduction: Median nerve ultrasound shows increased cross‐sectional area (CSA) in carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) and diabetic peripheral neuropathy (PN). The role of ultrasound in diagnosing CTS superimposed on diabetic PN is unknown. The objective of this study is to evaluate ultrasound for diagnosis of CTS in diabetic PN. Methods: Prospective recruitment of diabetics with electrodiagnostically proven PN, subdivided into cases (with CTS) or controls (without CTS). The gold standard for CTS was clinical diagnosis. NCS were correlated with blinded median nerve CSA ultrasound measurements. Results: Eight cases (CTS) and eight controls (no CTS) were recruited. Nerve conduction studies (NCS): Median nerve distal latencies (antidromic sensory; palmar; lumbrical motor; and lumbrical motor to ulnar interosseous difference) were significantly prolonged in CTS cases. No ultrasound measurement (distal median CSA, wrist‐forearm ratio, wrist‐forearm difference) reached significance to detect CTS. Area under the curve was greatest for lumbrical distal latency by receiver operator characteristic analysis (0.85). Conclusions: In this pilot study, NCS may be superior to ultrasound for identification of superimposed CTS in diabetic PN patients, but larger numbers are needed for confirmation. Muscle Nerve 47: 437–439, 2013

Background Congenital hyposensitivity to pain or hereditary sensory and autonomic neuropathy represents a variety of disorders characterized by decreased perception of nociception, loss of other modalities of sensation, and variable expression of autonomic dysfunction. Sensory loss, especially that of pain, is associated with self-mutilations that may require frequent operations. Little is known about the safety of anesthesia for these patients. Methods The authors performed a computerized search of the Mayo Clinic medical records database between January 1996 and November 2005 for patients with congenital hyposensitivity to pain and related disorders who underwent general anesthesia. Medical records were reviewed for demographics, anesthetic techniques and agents, use of opioids, and perioperative complications. In addition, the authors conducted a comprehensive review of the literature to summarize the current knowledge regarding anesthesia for patients with congenital hyposensitivity to pain, and compared it with the patients with hyposensitivity to pain identified at the Mayo Clinic. Results The authors identified seven patients with hereditary sensory and autonomic neuropathy II, IV, or V and undefined variants of congenital pain hyposensitivity who generated 17 anesthesia records: 12 for orthopedic operations, 3 for sural nerve biopsies, and 2 for ophthalmologic procedures. In all patients, standard doses of volatile agents were used during anesthesia. Small amounts of opioids were used during the course of eight operations. Most patients experienced mild hypothermia (lowest temperature 34.7 degrees C), and none experienced hyperthermia. All patients were hemodynamically stable during otherwise uneventful anesthesia. During recovery from anesthesia, opioids were given to only one patient, a single dose of 1 mg morphine. Even after major orthopedic operations, the patient did not require additional analgesia. Conclusions The patients with profound congenital hyposensitivity to pain underwent anesthesia without any adverse events. The authors found that despite reduced pain perception, the requirements for volatile anesthetics were within the expected range for population with normal pain perception, but they did not require opioids postoperatively. Intraoperative mild hypothermia was easily managed by adjustment of environmental temperature.