Citations

Abstract Osteoporosis is a serious complication of systemic glucocorticoid use. However, while glucocorticoids increase bone resorption in vitro and in vivo, the mechanism(s) of this effect are at present unclear. Recent studies have identified the osteoprotegerin (OPG) ligand (OPG-L) as the final effector of osteoclastogenesis, an action that is opposed by the soluble neutralizing receptor, OPG. Thus, we assessed glucocorticoid regulation of OPG and OPG-L in various human osteoblastic lineage cells using Northern analysis, RT-PCR, and ELISA. Dexamethasone inhibited constitutive OPG messenger RNA (mRNA) steady-state levels by 70–90% in primary (MS) and immortalized stromal cells (hMS), primary trabecular osteoblasts (hOB), immortalized fetal osteoblasts (hFOB), and osteosarcoma cells (MG-63). In hFOB cells, dexamethasone inhibited constitutive OPG mRNA steady-state levels in a dose- and time-dependent fashion by 90%, and also suppressed cytokine-stimulated OPG mRNA steady-state levels. Dexamethasone-induced inhibition of OPG mRNA levels was not affected by the protein synthesis inhibitor, cycloheximide, and was shown to be due to inhibition of OPG gene transcription using a nuclear run-on assay. Moreover, dexamethasone also dose dependently (10−10m–10−7m) inhibited constitutive OPG protein concentrations in the conditioned medium of hFOB cells from 2.59 ± 0.02 ng/ml (control) to 0.30 ± 0.01 ng/ml (88% inhibition; P < 0.001 by ANOVA). Concurrently, dexamethasone stimulated OPG-L mRNA steady-state levels in MS and hFOB cells by 2- and 4-fold, respectively. Treatment of murine marrow cultures with conditioned medium harvested from dexamethasone-treated MG-63 cells increased tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP) activity by 54% (P < 0.005) compared with medium harvested from control-treated cells (in the presence of OPG-L and macrophage colony-stimulating factor). Moreover, dexamethasone (10−8m) promoted osteoclast formation in vitro, as assessed by a 2.5-fold increase of TRAP activity in cell lysates (P < 0.001) and the appearance of TRAP-positive multinucleated cells. Our data are thus consistent with the hypothesis that glucocorticoids promote osteoclastogenesis by inhibiting OPG and concurrently stimulating OPG-L production by osteoblastic lineage cells, thereby enhancing bone resorption.

Bone marrow‐derived macrophages (BMMs) treated with granulocyte‐macrophage colony‐stimulating factor (GM‐CSF) or macrophage colony‐stimulating factor (M‐CSF), differentiate into GM‐CSF‐induced mouse bone marrow‐derived macrophages (GM‐BMMs) or M‐CSF‐induced mouse bone marrow‐derived macrophages (M‐BMMs), which have an M1 or M2 profile, respectively. GM‐BMMs produce large amounts of proinflammatory cytokines and mediate resistance to pathogens, whereas M‐BMMs produce antiinflammatory cytokines that contribute to tissue repair and remodeling. M‐BMMs stimulated with lipopolysaccharide (LPS) are in an antiinflammatory state, with an IL‐12lowIL‐10high phenotype. However, the regulation of this process remains unclear. Klf10 belongs to the family of Krüppel‐like transcription factors and was initially described as a TGF‐β inducible early gene 1. IL‐12p40 is upregulated in LPS‐stimulated M‐BMMs from Klf10‐deficient mice, but downregulated during Klf10 overexpression. Klf11, another member of the Krüppel‐like factor family, can also repress the production of IL‐12p40. Furthermore, Klf10 binds to the CACCC element of the IL‐12p40 promoter and inhibits its transcription. We have therefore identified Klf10 as a transcription factor that regulates the expression of IL‐12p40 in M‐BMMs.

Abstract Background The role of estrogen receptor alpha (ERα) in breast cancer has been studied extensively; yet, much less is known about full-length ERβ (ERβ1) and even less about its 4 variant forms (ERβ2-5). We have recently implicated a role for ERβ1 in sensitizing ERα expressing breast cancer cells to anti-estrogens. However, the ability of ERβ2-5 to modulate ERα and ERβ1 activity, and their association with cancer development, progression, and response to estradiol (E2) and anti-estrogens are not well understood. Here, we provide evidence that the presence of ERβ variants may be of diagnostic and clinical relevance for breast cancer patients and describe the development and characterization of a novel, highly specific monoclonal antibody (MC10) that is able to detect their expression in tumor biopsies. Methods: Transient transfection and luciferase assays were used to determine the transcriptional activity of ERβ2-5 in response to E2 and anti-estrogens alone or in combination with ERα and ERβ1. A novel monoclonal antibody targeting all ERβ variants (MC10) was developed and characterized. The sub-cellular localization of ERβ2-5 was determined via confocal microscopy. Finally, the MC10 antibody was used to assess ERβ positivity in breast tumors and was compared to that of another monoclonal antibody which only detects ERβ1. Results: Unlike ERβ1, ERβ2-5 do not activate an estrogen response element (ERE) in response to E2 and instead, slightly repress the activity of this reporter construct. Expression of ERβ2-5 does not significantly alter the transcriptional activity of ERβ1 following E2 treatment. However, ERβ2, 3 and 5, but not ERβ4, significantly enhance the E2-induced transcriptional activity of ERα. Interestingly, expression of ERβ3, 4 and 5, but not ERβ2, enhance the ability of anti-estrogens to block ERα mediated transcriptional activity. Confocal microscopy revealed that ERβ1 and 2 are almost exclusively localized to the cell nucleus. However, ERβ3-5 exhibit significant cytoplasmic and peri-nuclear localization. Immunohistochemistry of breast cancer biopsies using the MC10 antibody revealed multiple staining patterns including tumors which exhibit primarily nuclear staining and others primarily cytoplasmic, both in the presence and absence of ERα. These results are in contrast to the almost exclusive nuclear staining obtained on the same tumors with an ERβ1-specific antibody. Conclusions: ERβ variants exhibit variable sub-cellular localization patterns and can influence the function of ERα, both in response to E2 and anti-estrogens. Therefore, the differential expression of ERβ variants and their cellular localization may influence breast cancer progression and/or therapeutic responses. The use of ERβ antibodies which do not detect all ERβ variants, or the use of a single ERβ antibody which does not discriminate between ERβ1 and its variants, is unlikely to reveal the complete biological significance of total ERβ expression in breast cancer and may in part explain the conflicting studies which have been reported for ERβ in the field. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2011;71(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-02-03.

Abstract Background Commonly used endocrine therapies for breast cancer, such as aromatase inhibitors in postmenopausal women and tamoxifen in premenopausal women, have deleterious effects on bone mineral density. Therefore, the identification of novel cancer therapies which either maintain or improve bone mass are of clinical need. We have recently demonstrated that endoxifen is the most active tamoxifen metabolite with regard to inhibiting the growth of ERα+ breast cancer cells and these studies have led to the development of endoxifen as a novel anti-breast cancer drug for which first-in-human studies are now underway. At present, there are no data regarding endoxifen's effects on bone. Methods: The effects of endoxifen on osteoblast (OB) and osteoclast (OC) maturation and gene expression were monitored by cell differentiation assays and real-time PCR. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), peripheral Quantitative Computed Tomography (pQCT) and micro-Computed Tomography (μCT) were used to determine changes in bone density, mass and architecture following 45 days of oral endoxifen administration (50mg/kg/day) to 3-month-old ovariectomized (OVX) C57BL/6 mice relative to vehicle control treated animals. Alterations in the numbers and activity of OBs and OCs were determined by histomorphometry and serum levels of P1NP and CTX-1 respectively. Results: Endoxifen treatment of mouse derived bone marrow stromal cells and human OBs led to significant increases in the expression of critical bone marker genes such as Runx2, osterix, osteocalcin, osteoprotegerin and alkaline phosphatase in a dose dependent manner. Daily administration of endoxifen to OVX mice led to significant increases in total body bone mineral density (BMD) (6%) and content (BMC) (9%), which was accompanied by a 50% decrease in fat tissue mass as determined by DXA. pQCT analysis of the tibial metaphysis revealed dramatic increases in BMD (35%) and BMC (20%), as well as trabecular density (52%), cortical content (62%), cortical area (60%) and cortical thickness (78%). μCT analysis of the femoral metaphysis revealed increases in bone volume/total volume (200%), trabecular number (38%) and trabecular thickness (18%), as well as decreased trabecular spacing (29%). Interestingly, there was nearly a 50% increase in the numbers of OCs derived from endoxifen treated mice which was associated with elevated expression of OC marker genes such as NFATcl, RANK, c-fms and cathepsin-K compared to control treated animals. Approximately 4 times as many OBs and OCs were observed on the bone surfaces of endoxifen treated mice which correlated with nearly 2-fold increases in serum levels of the bone formation (P1NP) and resorption (CTX-1) markers. Conclusions: These data are the first to demonstrate that endoxifen has anabolic effects on the mouse skeleton which are similar to that of estrogen. Additionally, these data reveal that endoxifen's mechanism of action in bone is different than that reported for tamoxifen and other selective estrogen receptor modulators in mice as it increases, rather than decreases, bone formation and remodeling. Therefore, the use of endoxifen for the treatment of endocrine responsive breast cancer may avoid the detrimental skeletal effects of many conventional endocrine therapies. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2011;71(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-16-09.

Abstract Emerging evidence demonstrates that proangiogenic cells (PACs) originate from the BM and are capable of being recruited to sites of ischemic injury where they contribute to neovascularization. We previously determined that among hematopoietic progenitor stem cells, common myeloid progenitors (CMPs) and granulocyte-macrophage progenitor cells (GMPs) differentiate into PACs and possess robust angiogenic activity under ischemic conditions. Herein, we report that a TGF-β1–responsive Krüppel- like factor, KLF10, is strongly expressed in PACs derived from CMPs and GMPs, ∼ 60-fold higher than in progenitors lacking PAC markers. KLF10−/− mice present with marked defects in PAC differentiation, function, TGF-β responsiveness, and impaired blood flow recovery after hindlimb ischemia, an effect rescued by wild-type PACs, but not KLF10−/− PACs. Overexpression studies revealed that KLF10 could rescue PAC formation from TGF-β1+/− CMPs and GMPs. Mechanistically, KLF10 targets the VEGFR2 promoter in PACs which may underlie the observed effects. These findings may be clinically relevant because KLF10 expression was also found to be significantly reduced in PACs from patients with peripheral artery disease. Collectively, these observations identify TGF-β1 signaling and KLF10 as key regulators of functional PACs derived from CMPs and GMPs and may provide a therapeutic target during cardiovascular ischemic states.

Abstract Background: A major issue surrounding the use of therapeutic drugs for the treatment of breast cancer is the eventual development of resistance. Endoxifen, the most potent tamoxifen metabolite, is being developed as a novel endocrine therapy for the treatment of endocrine responsive breast cancer patients. While numerous studies have investigated the process of tamoxifen resistance, no such data exist regarding the mechanism by which cells develop resistance to endoxifen. Here, we describe the development and characterization of a novel endoxifen resistant MCF7 breast cancer cell line and the identification of a specific treatment to effectively target these resistant cells. Methods: MCF7 cells were chronically exposed to concentrations of endoxifen previously demonstrated to be associated with the greatest reductions in estrogen stimulated proliferation and transcription (1000 nM). Changes in the physiological and molecular properties of these cells were monitored during the course of resistance using a wide range of techniques. Results: Following 15 months of endoxifen exposure, an epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT) was induced in MCF7 cells, characterized by loss of E-cadherin expression, up-regulation of fibronectin and vimentin expression and increased responsiveness to TGFβ. Resistant cells exhibit a 7-fold increase in their proliferation rates relative to parental cells and display basal like properties (triple negative) due to silencing of ERα , progesterone receptor and CD24 expression. Resistant cells were confirmed to be estrogen insensitive through the use of cell proliferation and gene expression studies. Wound healing and cell migration assays revealed that resistant cells are highly aggressive with a significant level of metastatic potential. Microarray analysis revealed over 7500 genes to be differentially expressed in the resistant cell line relative to parental cells using a 2-fold cutoff, of which only 52 genes (0.7%) were determined to be up-regulated. Interestingly, a number of the most highly altered genes have previously been implicated in the development of EMT and/or resistance including Twist2, IGF binding protein 5, GATA and β-tubulin. Based on the identification of P-tubulin as the most up-regulated gene in resistant cells, 2-methoxyestradiol (2ME2) was recognized as a candidate drug to specifically target this resistant cell line due to it known roles in blocking tubulin polymerization. Indeed, 2ME2 exposure resulted in the induction of apoptosis and significant cell death in vitro. Conclusions: Chronic exposure of MCF7 cells to high concentrations of endoxifen led to induction of EMT with cells that are basal like, estrogen and SERM insensitive, highly TGFP responsive with significantly increased proliferation rates and metastatic potential relative to parental cells. These findings suggest that the mechanisms of resistance to endoxifen may differ from those observed with long term exposure to tamoxifen and have identified 2ME2 as a potentially successful alternative therapy for endoxifen resistant breast cancer cells. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2010;70(24 Suppl):Abstract nr PD05-11.

Abstract Background: The role of estrogen receptor alpha (ERα) in breast cancer has been studied extensively, and its protein expression is prognostic and a primary determinant of endocrine sensitivity; however, much less is known about the role of ERß. In vitro studies demonstrate a tumor suppressive function for ERß, and we have recently implicated a role for ERα in sensitizing ERα expressing breast cancer cells to the anti-estrogenic effects of endoxifen. However, the in vivo relevance of ERα remains unclear due to conflicting reports. Here, we provide evidence that some of this controversy may be explained by variability in antibody specificity. In addition, we describe the development and characterization of a novel, highly specific monoclonal antibody and provide data regarding ERα expression in human breast cancers. Methods: Five commercially available ERα antibodies were screened for their sensitivity and specificity using western blotting, immunoprecipitation, immunofluorescence and immunohistochemistry in known ERα negative and positive cell lines as well as in normal human tissue samples. A novel monoclonal ERα antibody (C10) was developed and characterized in the same manner. Following identification of two specific antibodies, ERα expression was assessed in 66 breast tumors collected prior to adjuvant therapy. Samples were scored separately for nuclear and cytoplasmic staining. Results: In depth analysis of commercially available ERα antibodies reveled that the majority were non-specific with substantial cross-reactivity to ERα . Only one commercial antibody (PPG5/10), which solely recognizes full-length ERß, and our newly developed monoclonal antibody, which recognizes full-length and all 4 ERα variants, were determined to be sensitive and specific for ERα expression. These same two antibodies resulted in strong staining for endogenous levels of ERα protein in normal prostate tissue by immunohistochemistry. We further assessed these two antibodies in a set of breast tumors. Preliminary analysis revealed significant differences for ERα positivity between these two antibodies. Based on nuclear staining, 92% of tumors were ERα positive using the PPG5/10 antibody while only 34% were positive with C10. Approximately 50% of all tumors exhibited cytoplasmic staining with both antibodies. Conclusions: Our studies demonstrate that the majority of commercially available ERα antibodies are either non-specific or insensitive for the detection of ERα via immunohistochemistry. The present data call into question the relevance of prior studies which tested the association between clinical outcome and ERα expression and demonstrate the need to further analyze the role of ERα in breast cancer using highly specific and validated antibodies. While both the PPG5/10 and C10 antibodies are highly specific for ERß, the significant discrepancy in nuclear staining between them in breast tumors may be due to changes in epitope availability as a result of post-translational processing. Our newly developed C10 antibody could provide additional discriminatory features which may be useful in predicting response to therapy and/or associations with other clinicopathological factors and such studies are currently underway. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2010;70(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-09-25.