Citations

Clear

35 citation(s) found for "Smith, Timothy L".

International consensus statement on allergy and rhinology: rhinosinusitis 2021
Orlandi, Richard R. , Kingdom, Todd T. , Smith, Timothy L. , Bleier, Benjamin S. , DeConde, Adam S., Luong, Amber , Poetker, David M., Welch, Kevin C. , Wise, Sarah K. , Adappa, Nithin D. , Anselmo‐Lima, Wilma Terezinha , Bachert, Claus , Baroody, Fuad M. , Batra, Pete S., Bernal‐Sprekelsen, Manuel , Bhattacharyya, Neil , Chang, Eugene H., Chowdhury, Naweed I. , Citardi, Martin J. , Cohen, Noah , Conley, David B. , DelGaudio, John M. , Desrosiers, Martin , Douglas, Richard , Eloy, Jean Anderson , Gray, Stacey T. , Gudis, David A. , Hamilos, Daniel L. , Han, Joseph K., Harvey, Richard J. , Hellings, Peter W. , Hopkins, Claire , Hwang, Peter H. , Javer, Amin R. , Kennedy, David W. , Kern, Robert C. , Lee, Heung‐Man , Lee, Jivianne T. , Levy, Joshua M. , Lin, Sandra Y. , Lund, Valerie, McMains, Kevin C. , Metson, Ralph, Naclerio, Robert M. , Oakley, Gretchen M. , Otori, Nobuyoshi , Parikh, Sanjay R., Patel, Zara M. , Peters, Anju T. , Philpott, Carl , Roh, Hwan‐Jung , Rudmik, Luke , Sacks, Raymond , Schlosser, Rodney J. , Sedaghat, Ahmad R. , Senior, Brent A. , Sindwani, Raj , Smith, Kristine A. , Stewart, Michael G. , Suh, Jeffrey D. , Tan, Bruce K. , Drunen, Cornelis M. van , Woodworth, Bradford A. , Wormald, Peter‐John , Wright, Erin D. , Yan, Carol H. , Zhang, Luo , Zhou, Bing , Chang, Michael T. , Bleier, Benjamin , Alt, Jeremiah A , Beswick, Daniel , Eloy, Jean Anderson , Gudis, David A , Holbrook, Eric H , Hopkins, Claire , Javer, Amin R , Jiang, Rong-San , Lal, Devyani , Lee, Heung-Man , Levy, Joshua M , Patel, Zara , Philpott, Carl , Ramakrishnan, Vijay R , Smith, Kristine , Yan, Carol , Zhang, Luo , Schlosser, Rodney J , Harvey, Richard J , Hwang, Peter H , Chang, Michael T , Soler, Zachary M. , Adappa, Nithin D. , Alt, Jeremiah A. , Beswick, Daniel M. , Chandra, Rakesh Kumar , Chang, Eugene H., Chiu, Alexander G. , Cohen, Noam A., Fokkens, Wytske Johanna , Holbrook, Eric H. , Laidlaw, Tanya M. , Lal, Devyani , Lane, Andrew P , Mullol, Joaquim , Passàli, Desiderio , Psaltis, Alkis J. , Ramanathan, Murugappan , Snidvongs, Kornkiat , Turner, Justin H. , Voegels, Richard Louis , Wang, De Yun

Mayo Clinic

International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology | November 25, 2020 | Volume: 11 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 213-739

10.1002/alr.22741 | PMID 33236525 Get It

I. Executive Summary Background The 5 years since the publication of the first International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Rhinosinusitis (ICAR‐RS) has witnessed foundational progress in our understanding and treatment of rhinologic disease. These advances are reflected within the more than 40 new topics covered within the ICAR‐RS‐2021 as well as updates to the original 140 topics. This executive summary consolidates the evidence‐based findings of the document. Methods ICAR‐RS presents over 180 topics in the forms of evidence‐based reviews with recommendations (EBRRs), evidence‐based reviews, and literature reviews. The highest grade structured recommendations of the EBRR sections are summarized in this executive summary. Results ICAR‐RS‐2021 covers 22 topics regarding the medical management of RS, which are grade A/B and are presented in the executive summary. Additionally, 4 topics regarding the surgical management of RS are grade A/B and are presented in the executive summary. Finally, a comprehensive evidence‐based management algorithm is provided. Conclusion This ICAR‐RS‐2021 executive summary provides a compilation of the evidence‐based recommendations for medical and surgical treatment of the most common forms of RS.
Addressing the Crisis of Diagnosis and Management of Migraine in Primary Care: A Summary of the American Headache Society FrontLine Primary Care Advisory Board
Minen, Mia T. , Robbins, Matthew S. , Loder, Elizabeth , Nahas, Stephanie J. , Gautreaux, Jessica , Litin, Scott C., Barch, Carol, Cook, Calli , Smith, Timothy R. , Powers, Scott W. , Hasan, Saba , Sbar, Evelyn, Stika, Catherine S. , Stone, Frederick H., Sprouse‐Blum, Adam, Blum, Adam , Litin, Scott, Robbins, Matthew S , Sprouse-Blum, Adam S , Minen, Mia T , Stone, Frederick

Mayo Clinic

Headache: The Journal of Head and Face Pain | April 8, 2020 | Volume: 60 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 1000-1004

10.1111/head.13797 | PMID 32267961 Get It

Peripheral nerve repair throughout the body with processed nerve allografts: Results from a large multicenter study
Safa, Bauback , Jain, Sonu A. , Desai, Mihir J., Greenberg, Jeffrey A., Niacaris, Timothy, Nydick, Jason A. , Leversedge, Fraser J. , Megee, David M., Zoldos, Jozef, Rinker, Brian, McKee, Desirae , MacKay, Brendan J. , Ingari, John V. , Nesti, Leon J. , Cho, Mickey, Valerio, Ian L. , Kao, Dennis S. , El‐Sheikh, Yasser, Weber, Renata V., Shores, Jaimie T. , Styron, Joseph F. , Thayer, Wesley P. , Przylecki, Wojciech, Hoyen, Harry A. , Buncke, Gregory M.

Mayo Clinic

Microsurgery | February 26, 2020 | Volume: 40 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 527-537

10.1002/micr.30574 | PMID 32101338 Get It

AbstractBackgroundPeripheral nerve damage resulting in pain, loss of sensation, or motor function may necessitate a reconstruction with a bridging material. The RANGER® Registry was designed to evaluate outcomes following nerve repair with processed nerve allograft (Avance® Nerve Graft; Axogen; Alachua, FL). Here we report on the results from the largest peripheral nerve registry to‐date.MethodsThis multicenter IRB‐approved registry study collected data from patients repaired with processed nerve allograft (PNA). Sites followed their own standard of care for patient treatment and follow‐up. Data were assessed for meaningful recovery, defined as ≥S3/M3 to remain consistent with previously published results, and comparisons were made to reference literature.ResultsThe study included 385 subjects and 624 nerve repairs. Overall, 82% meaningful recovery (MR) was achieved across sensory, mixed, and motor nerve repairs up to gaps of 70 mm. No related adverse events were reported. There were no significant differences in MR across the nerve type, age, time‐to‐repair, and smoking status subgroups in the upper extremity (p > .05). Significant differences were noted by the mechanism of injury subgroups between complex injures (74%) as compared to lacerations (85%) or neuroma resections (94%) (p = .03) and by gap length between the <15 mm and 50–70 mm gap subgroups, 91 and 69% MR, respectively (p = .01). Results were comparable to historical literature for nerve autograft and exceed that of conduit.ConclusionsThese findings provide clinical evidence to support the continued use of PNA up to 70 mm in sensory, mixed and motor nerve repair throughout the body and across a broad patient population.
Pearls for Interpreting Neurosurgical Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: Lessons From a Collaborative Effort
Lu, Victor M. , Graffeo, Christopher S. , Perry, Avital , Link, Michael J., Meyer, Fredric B. , Dawood, Hassan Y. , Mekary, Rania A. , Smith, Timothy R. , Link, Michael J.

Mayo Clinic

Neurosurgery | January 24, 2020 | Volume: 87 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 435-441

10.1093/neuros/nyaa027 | PMID 32140720 Get It

Abstract Systematic reviews and meta-analyses in the neurosurgical literature have surged in popularity over the last decade. It is our concern that, without a renewed effort to critically interpret and appraise these studies as high or low quality, we run the risk of the quality and value of evidence-based medicine in neurosurgery being misinterpreted. Correspondingly, we have outlined 4 major domains to target in interpreting neurosurgical systematic reviews and meta-analyses based on the lessons learned by a collaboration of clinicians and academics summarized as 4 pearls. The domains of (1) heterogeneity, (2) modeling, (3) certainty, and (4) bias in neurosurgical systematic reviews and meta-analyses were identified as aspects in which the authors’ approaches have changed over time to improve robustness and transparency. Examples of how and why these pearls were adapted were provided in areas of cranial neuralgia, spine, pediatric, and neuro-oncology to demonstrate how neurosurgical readers and writers may improve their interpretation of these domains. The incorporation of these pearls into practice will empower neurosurgical academics to effectively interpret systematic reviews and meta-analyses, enhancing the quality of our evidence-based medicine literature while maintaining a critical focus on the needs of the individual patients in neurosurgery.
A Novel Mechanism of GLI2 Mediated Regulation of IgM Secretion in Waldenström Macroglobulinemia
Jackson, David A. , Amarsaikhan, Nansalmaa, Vrabel, Ann, Tolosa, Ezequiel J. , Almada, Luciana L. , Fernández-Zapico, Martín E. , Smith, Timothy D., Elsawa, Sherine F.

Mayo Clinic

Blood | October 11, 2019 | Volume: 124 | Issue: 21 | Pages: 3006-3006

10.1182/blood.v124.21.3006.3006 Get It

Abstract Immunoglobulin (Ig) secretion by terminally differentiated B-cells is important in the immune response to pathogens. Its over production is a defining characteristic of many B-cell malignancies, including Waldenström Macroglobulinemia (WM), where elevated IgM is associated with significant morbidity and poor prognosis. Thus, the identification and characterization of the mechanisms controlling Ig secretion are of great importance for the development of future therapeutic approaches for these diseases. Here, we define a novel pathway involving the oncogenic transcription factor, GLI2, modulating IgM secretion via regulation of IL-6 receptor alpha subunit (IL6Rα) expression in WM cells. We have previously identified components of the Hedgehog (HH)-GLI pathway as modulators of Ig secretion. Pharmacological (GANT61) and genetic (shRNA) inhibition of GLI proteins resulted in no significant effect on cell proliferation or viability, while there was a significant reduction in IgM secretion (60%) in BCWM.1 (p<0.0001), (55%) in MWCL-1 (p<0.0001) and (50%) in RPCI-WM1 (p<0.0001) cells. Interestingly, this occurred independent of HH signaling as manipulation of HH had no effect on IgM secretion, cell growth or viability. Screening for a mechanism identified IL6Rα as a downstream direct target of GLI activity. GANT61 treatment significantly reduces IL6Rα promoter activity in BCWM.1 (p=0.0002), MWCL-1 (P=0.0003) and RPCI-WM1 (p<0.0001) cells. GLI2 knockdown using two independent shGLI2 constructs resulted in reduced IL6Rα mRNA expression (p<0.0001) determined by qPCR, and IL6Rα protein expression examined by FACS analysis. Similarly, GLI2 knockdown diminished IL6Rα promoter activity in BCWM.1 (p=0.0218), MWCL-1 (p=0.0008) and RPCI-WM1 (p=0.0002) cells. Using bioinformatics analysis, we identified three candidate GLI2 binding sites in the IL6Rα promoter region. Using chromatin immunoprecipitation assay (ChIP) followed by qPCR, we confirmed that GLI2 directly binds to the IL6Rα promoter region (-1294 / -1065). Finally, we were able to rescue the reduction in IgM secretion in GLI2 knockdown group by overexpressing IL6Rα (p=0.0142). Taken together, these data reveal a novel mechanism where GLI2 modulates IgM secretion in WM through the regulation of IL6Rα expression. Given the poor prognosis associated with elevated IgM in WM patients, components of this new signaling axis could be important therapeutic targets. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
Surgical Outcomes of Endoscopic Versus Open Resection for Primary Sinonasal Malignancy: A Meta-analysis
Lu, Victor M. , Ravindran, Krishnan , Smith, Timothy R. , Donaldson, Angela M. , Quiñones‐Hinojosa, Alfredo , Mekary, Rania A. , Chaichana, Kaisorn L. , Phan, Kevin H. , Gompel, Jamie J. Van

Mayo Clinic

American Journal of Rhinology & Allergy | June 20, 2019 | Volume: 33 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 608-616

10.1177/1945892419856976 | PMID 31219311 Get It

Background Endoscopic resection (ER) for uncommon sinonasal malignancies (SNMs) has been reported to confer superior surgical outcomes compared to open resection (OR) based on indirect comparisons of limited evidence. Objective The aim of this study was to pool all direct comparative studies in the literature to validate this potential superior association. Methods Systematic searches of 7 electronic databases from their inception to April 2019 were conducted following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. There were 1001 articles identified for screening. Outcomes of interest were pooled as risk ratios (RRs) and mean difference (MD) and analyzed using a random-effects model. Results There were 10 studies included in this meta-analysis, with 900 SNM patients in total where ER and OR were utilized in 399 (44%) and 501 (56%) cases, respectively. Compared to OR, random-effects (RE) modeling indicated ER resulted in statistically comparable complications (RR = 0.68; P-effect = .12) and recurrence (RR = 0.84; P-effect = .35). ER was associated with significantly shorter length of stay (LOS) compared to OR (MD = −2.9 days; P-effect <.01). Conclusions The use of ER to manage SNM was associated with significantly favorable reduction in LOS compared to OR. However, with respect to other surgical outcomes and recurrence, the current literature does not indicate either ER or OR as statistically superior. Therefore, until greater validation of these associations can be proven, expectations that ER for SNMs confers superior surgical outcomes compared to OR should be tempered.
A framework for quality measurement in the presurgical care of chronic rhinosinusitis: a review from the Quality Improvement Committee of the American Rhinologic Society
Mattos, José L. , Rudmik, Luke , Manes, Peter R., Lee, Jivianne, Schneider, John S. , Setzen, Michael, Parasher, Arjun K. , Smith, Timothy L. , Stokken, Janalee K., Stokken, Janalee K. , Smith, Timothy L , Carlson, Matthew L , Mattos, Jose , Soler, Zachary M. , Higgins, Thomas S , Lee, Jivianne T.

Mayo Clinic

International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology | September 3, 2018 | Volume: 8 | Issue: 12 | Pages: 1380-1388

10.1002/alr.22154 | PMID 30175899 Get It

BackgroundQuality improvement (QI) in the management of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is garnering increasing attention. Defining frameworks and metrics to assess the quality of key components in CRS management could assist in reducing unwarranted practice variation and increase high‐quality care.MethodsA panel of the American Rhinologic Society (ARS) QI committee reviewed the literature to determine important presurgical components of CRS care that warrant QI. The evidence was organized into 4 categories: (1) diagnosis, (2) medical management, (3) appropriate patient selection for surgery, and (4) patient‐centered discussion. The combination of these categories was used to develop a framework termed the CRS Appropriate Presurgical Algorithm (CAPA).ResultsPrior to offering surgery for CRS, the best available evidence support the following quality metrics: (1) a guideline‐based diagnosis should be confirmed; (2) appropriate medical management, including a minimum of topical corticosteroid therapy and saline irrigations, should have been attempted (assuming patient tolerance); (3) a computed tomography (CT) scan should be obtained (to confirm the presence of sinus inflammation and for surgical planning); and (4) a patient‐centered discussion regarding treatment options for refractory CRS (ie, alternative medical therapies vs surgery vs observation) while focusing on risks and benefits, the need for long‐term medical compliance, and understanding of patient preferences and expectations.ConclusionDefining metrics that assess key components to CRS care prior to offering surgery has the potential to further improve upon an already successful treatment paradigm, reduce unwarranted practice variation, and to ensure that patients are receiving a similar level of high‐quality care.
Oversight and Ethical Regulation of Conflicts of Interest in Neurosurgery in the United States
DiRisio, Aislyn C. , Muskens, Ivo S. , Coté, David J. , Babu, Maya , Gormley, William B. , Smith, Timothy R. , Moojen, Wouter A. , Broekman, Marike L. D.

Mayo Clinic

Neurosurgery | May 2, 2018 | Volume: 84 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 305-312

10.1093/neuros/nyy227 | PMID 29850841 Get It

Abstract BACKGROUND Developmental incentives are fundamental to surgical progress, yet financial and professional incentives inherently create conflicts of interest (COI). Understanding how to manage COI held by neurosurgeons, industry, hospitals, and journal editors, without thwarting progress and innovation is critical. OBJECTIVE To present an overview of COI associated with innovation in neurosurgery, and review ways to manage these in an ethically sound manner. METHODS A review of the literature was performed to assess conflicts of interest that affect neurosurgical innovation, and review ways to manage COI of various parties while adhering to ethical standards. RESULTS COI are inherent to collaboration and innovation, and are therefore an unavoidable component of neurosurgery. The lack of a clear distinction between clinical practice and innovation, ability to use devices off-label, and unstandardized disclosure requirements create inconsistencies in the way that conflicts of interest are handled. Additionally, lack of requirements to compare innovation to the standard of care and inherent bias that affects study design and interpretation can have profound effects on the medical literature. Conflicts of interest can have both direct and downstream effects on neurosurgical practice, and it is possible to manage them while improving the quality of research and innovation. CONCLUSION Conflicts of interest are inherent to surgical innovation, and can be handled in an ethically sound manner. Neurosurgeons, device companies, hospitals, and medical journals can take steps to proactively confront bias and ensure patient autonomy and safety. These steps can preserve public trust and ultimately improve evidence-based neurosurgical practice.
Developing drugs for treatment of atopic dermatitis in children (≥3 months to
Siegfried, Elaine C. , Jaworski, Jennifer C., Eichenfield, Lawrence F. , Altman, Emily , Arena, Charles, Block, Julie, Boguniewicz, Mark , Chen, Suephy C. , Hanna, Diane , Horii, Kimberly A., Hultsch, Thomas , Lio, Peter , Milner, Joshua D. , Omachi, Theodore A. , Schneider, Lynda C. , Sidbury, Robert , Smith, Timothy W. , Sugarman, Jeffrey, Taha, Sharif, Tofte, Susan, Tollefson, Megha M. , Tom, Wynnis L. , Whitney, Lucinda , Zane, Lee T., Tollefson, Megha, Paller, Amy S. , Hebert, Adelaide Ann , Simpson, Eric Lawrence , Blauvelt, Andrew , Cordoro, Kelly M. , Lee, James , Leung, Donald Y.M. , Schneider, Christine B. , Sugarman, Jeffrey, West, Dennis Paul

Mayo Clinic

Pediatric Dermatology | March 30, 2018 | Volume: 35 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 303-322

10.1111/pde.13452 | PMID 29600515 Get It

AbstractAtopic dermatitis is the most common chronic skin disease, and it primarily affects children. Although atopic dermatitis (AD) has the highest effect on burden of skin disease, no high‐level studies have defined optimal therapy for severe disease. Corticosteroids have been used to treat AD since the 1950s and remain the only systemic medication with Food and Drug Administration approval for this indication in children, despite published guidelines of care that recommend against this option. Several clinical trials with level 1 evidence have supported the use of topical treatments for mild to moderate atopic dermatitis in adults and children, but these trials have had little consistency in protocol design. Consensus recommendations will help standardize clinical development and trial design for children. The Food and Drug Administration issues guidance documents for industry as a source for “the Agency's current thinking on a particular subject.” Although they are nonbinding, industry considers these documents to be the standard for clinical development and trial design. Our consensus group is the first to specifically address clinical trial design in this population. We developed a draft guidance document for industry, Developing Drugs for Treatment of Atopic Dermatitis in Children (≥3 months to <18 years of age). This draft guidance has been submitted to the Food and Drug Administration based on a provision in the Federal Register (Good Guidance Practices).
Modulation of the IL-6 Receptor α Underlies GLI2-Mediated Regulation of Ig Secretion in Waldenström Macroglobulinemia Cells
Jackson, David A. , Amarsaikhan, Nansalmaa, Han, Weiguo , Neil, Matthew S , Boi, Shannon K. , Vrabel, Anne M., Tolosa, Ezequiel J. , Almada, Luciana L. , Fernández-Zapico, Martín E. , Elsawa, Sherine F. , Elsawa, Sherine F , Smith, Timothy D

Mayo Clinic

The Journal of Immunology | August 4, 2015 | Volume: 195 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 2908-2916

10.4049/jimmunol.1402974 | PMID 26238488 Get It

Abstract Ig secretion by terminally differentiated B cells is an important component of the immune response to foreign pathogens. Its overproduction is a defining characteristic of several B cell malignancies, including Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM), where elevated IgM is associated with significant morbidity and poor prognosis. Therefore, the identification and characterization of the mechanisms controlling Ig secretion are of great importance for the development of future therapeutic approaches for this disease. In this study, we define a novel pathway involving the oncogenic transcription factor GLI2 modulating IgM secretion by WM malignant cells. Pharmacological and genetic inhibition of GLI2 in WM malignant cells resulted in a reduction in IgM secretion. Screening for a mechanism identified the IL-6Rα (gp80) subunit as a downstream target of GLI2 mediating the regulation of IgM secretion. Using a combination of expression, luciferase, and chromatin immunoprecipitation assays we demonstrate that GLI2 binds to the IL-6Rα promoter and regulates its activity as well as the expression of this receptor. Additionally, we were able to rescue the reduction in IgM secretion in the GLI2 knockdown group by overexpressing IL-6Rα, thus defining the functional significance of this receptor in GLI2-mediated regulation of IgM secretion. Interestingly, this occurred independent of Hedgehog signaling, a known regulator of GLI2, as manipulation of Hedgehog had no effect on IgM secretion. Given the poor prognosis associated with elevated IgM in WM patients, components of this new signaling axis could be important therapeutic targets.