Citations

Abstract CCGA [NCT02889978] is the largest study of cfDNA-based early cancer detection; the first CCGA learnings from multiple cfDNA assays are reported here. This prospective, multi-center, observational study has enrolled 10,012 of 15,000 demographically-balanced participants at 141 sites. Blood was collected from participants with newly diagnosed therapy-naive cancer (C, case) and participants without a diagnosis of cancer (noncancer [NC], control) as defined at enrollment. This preplanned substudy included 878 cases, 580 controls, and 169 assay controls (n=1627) across 20 tumor types and all clinical stages. All samples were analyzed by: 1) Paired cfDNA and white blood cell (WBC)-targeted sequencing (60,000X, 507 gene panel); a joint caller removed WBC-derived somatic variants and residual technical noise; 2) Paired cfDNA and WBC whole-genome sequencing (WGS; 35X); a novel machine learning algorithm generated cancer-related signal scores; joint analysis identified shared events; and 3) cfDNA whole-genome bisulfite sequencing (WGBS; 34X); normalized scores were generated using abnormally methylated fragments. In the targeted assay, non-tumor WBC-matched cfDNA somatic variants (SNVs/indels) accounted for 76% of all variants in NC and 65% in C. Consistent with somatic mosaicism (i.e., clonal hematopoiesis), WBC-matched variants increased with age; several were non-canonical loss-of-function mutations not previously reported. After WBC variant removal, canonical driver somatic variants were highly specific to C (e.g., in EGFR and PIK3CA, 0 NC had variants vs 11 and 30, respectively, of C). Similarly, of 8 NC with somatic copy number alterations (SCNAs) detected with WGS, 4 were derived from WBCs. WGBS data revealed informative hyper- and hypo-fragment level CpGs (1:2 ratio); a subset was used to calculate methylation scores. A consistent “cancer-like” signal was observed in <1% of NC participants across all assays (representing potential undiagnosed cancers). An increasing trend was observed in NC vs stages I-III vs stage IV (nonsyn. SNVs/indels per Mb [Mean±SD] NC: 1.01±0.86, stages I-III: 2.43±3.98; stage IV: 6.45±6.79; WGS score NC: 0.00±0.08, I-III: 0.27±0.98; IV: 1.95± 2.33; methylation score NC: 0±0.50; I-III: 1.02±1.77; IV: 3.94±1.70). These data demonstrate the feasibility of achieving >99% specificity for invasive cancer, and support the promise of cfDNA assay for early cancer detection. Additional data will be presented on detected plasma:tissue variant concordance and on multi-assay modeling. Citation Format: Alexander A. Aravanis, Geoffrey R. Oxnard, Tara Maddala, Earl Hubbell, Oliver Venn, Arash Jamshidi, Ling Shen, Hamed Amini, John A. Beausang, Craig Betts, Daniel Civello, Konstantin Davydov, Saniya Fazullina, Darya Filippova, Sante Gnerre, Samuel Gross, Chenlu Hou, Roger Jiang, Byoungsok Jung, Kathryn Kurtzman, Collin Melton, Shivani Nautiyal, Jonathan Newman, Joshua Newman, Cosmos Nicolaou, Richard Rava, Onur Sakarya, Ravi Vijaya Satya, Seyedmehdi Shojaee, Kristan Steffen, Anton Valouev, Hui Xu, Jeanne Yue, Nan Zhang, Jose Baselga, Rosanna Lapham, Daron G. Davis, David Smith, Donald Richards, Michael V. Seiden, Charles Swanton, Timothy J. Yeatman, Robert Tibshirani, Christina Curtis, Sylvia K. Plevritis, Richard Williams, Eric Klein, Anne-Renee Hartman, Minetta C. Liu. Development of plasma cell-free DNA (cfDNA) assays for early cancer detection: first insights from the Circulating Cell-Free Genome Atlas Study (CCGA) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2018; 2018 Apr 14-18; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(13 Suppl):Abstract nr LB-343.

LBA8501 Background: Plasma cfDNA genomic analysis is used widely for the care of advanced lung cancer, but its suitability for early stage lung cancer detection is not well established. CCGA (NCT02889978) is a prospective, multi-center, observational study launched for the development of a noninvasive assay for cancer detection. Methods: Blood was prospectively collected (N = 1627) from 749 controls (no cancer diagnosis) and 878 participants (pts) with newly-diagnosed untreated cancer in this preplanned substudy, including 127 pts with lung cancer. Three prototype sequencing assays were performed: paired cfDNA and white blood cell (WBC) targeted sequencing (507 genes, 60,000X) for single nucleotide variants/indels; paired cfDNA and WBC whole genome sequencing (WGS) for copy number variation (30X); and cfDNA whole genome bisulfite sequencing (WGBS) for methylation (30X). For each assay, a classification model using 10-fold cross-validation was developed for all pts with cancer, then evaluated in the pts with lung cancer; sensitivity was estimated at 95% specificity. Results: We evaluated pts with lung cancer (127) and a subset of controls (580) with similar ages (mean±SD yrs: 67±9, 60±13), 85% and 43% were ever-smokers, and 46% and 22% were men, respectively. Of 3055 nonsynonymous mutations detected across 122 evaluable pts with lung cancer, > 50% were detected in WBC consistent with clonal hematopoiesis (CH). Accounting for CH, sensitivity in 63 stage I-IIIA pts evaluable across all 3 assays was 48% (35-61, targeted), 54% (41-67, WGS), and 56% (43-68, WGBS); in 54 stage IIIB-IV pts it was 85% (73-93, targeted), 91% (80-97, WGS), and 93% (82-98, WGBS) . Similar sensitivities were observed across histological subtypes (adenocarcinoma, squamous cell, small cell). Comparison to tumor WGS and multi-assay classification will be reported. Conclusions: Early stage lung cancers are detectable in cfDNA using a genome-wide sequencing approach. For lung cancer detection using targeted assays, CH must be accounted for to minimize false positives. Assay optimization is ongoing to allow further clinical development in the intended use population. Clinical trial information: NCT02889978.

370 Background: The Phase 1 portion of a Phase 1/2 trial of Necuparanib (“Necu”) combined with nab-paclitaxel (nabP) + gemcitabine (gem) in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT01621243) showed acceptable safety and tolerability and encouraging signals of activity and established a dose for the randomized, placebo (PBO)-controlled Phase 2 portion. Methods: In Phase 2, patients received daily s.c. injections of either 5 mg/kg Necu daily or PBO, combined with i.v. 125 mg/m2 nabP and 1000 mg/m2 gem (Days 1, 8, 15 of each 28-day cycle). The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS); other endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), response rates, safety, and CA19.9 levels. An interim futility analysis was conducted in July 2016 once 57 deaths (50% of the target number of 114 events required for trial completion) had occurred. Results: The analysis was conducted on data from 120 randomized patients (62 Necu, 58 PBO). The Z-score for futility was -0.42 (prespecified boundary of -0.148 was crossed as actual score was lower). Median OS was Necu = 10.71 and PBO = 9.99 months; hazard ratio (HR) = 1.12 (favoring PBO); OS curves were intertwined. PFS was Necu = 5.52 and PBO = 6.93 months; HR = 0.97. RECIST response rates were comparable between arms: complete response, Necu = 0%, PBO = 3%; partial response, Necu = 26%, PBO = 26%; stable disease, Necu = 31%, PBO = 34%; disease control rate, Necu = 56%, PBO = 64%. The most common Grade 3+ adverse events (AEs) were neutropenia (Necu = 33%, PBO = 33%), thrombocytopenia (Necu = 27%, PBO = 5%), and anemia (Necu = 22%, PBO = 11%). There were lower rate of serious AEs with Necu (48%) vs. PBO (60%). Modest increases in APTT, AST, and ALT were noted following Necu relative to PBO. 23% of Necu and 5% of PBO patients were IgG positive with an anti-heparin/PF4 antibody titer of ≥ 0.4 at any time. There were no treatment differences for decreases in CA19.9. Conclusions: No new safety signals were observed and the toxicity profile was considered manageable; however, Necu in combination with nabP and gem did not show a sufficient level of efficacy in metastatic pancreatic cancer to warrant continued enrollment. Clinical trial information: NCT01621243.

294 Background: CX-4945 is a first-in-class casein kinase-2 (CK2) threonine kinase small molecule inhibitor. CK2 is pleiotropic and regulates key cellular processes such as proliferation and DNA damage repair, and has been shown to enhance efficacy of gemcitabine (G) and cisplatin (C) in cell line and xenograft CCA model systems. A Phase IB study of G+C with CX-4945 was conducted in advanced cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) patients. Methods: A multi-center “3+3” dose escalation study was conducted in advanced CCA patients. Eligible patients had ECOG PS 0-1 and adequate hematologic, hepatic, and renal function. Primary endpoints were maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D). Secondary endpoints included pharmacokinetic (PK) analyses, overall toxicity evaluation and preliminary assessment of efficacy. Routine clinical dosing for G (1000 mg/m2) and C (25 mg/m2), both on days 1 and 8 every 21 days, was used. Dose escalation cohort were CX-4945 given twice daily on days 0,1,2 and 7,8,9 at 200 mg (DL1), 400mg (DL2), 600 mg (DL3), 800 mg (DL4) and 1000 (DL5) mg. NCI CTCAE v4.03 was used for toxicity assessment and RECIST v1.1 for efficacy evaluation. Results: Nineteen patients were enrolled (DL1:n = 3; DL2:n = 4 DL3:n = 3; DL4:n = 4; DL5:n = 5). No dose limiting toxicities were encountered. MTD and RP2D were ascertained to be DL5. No grade 3 or 4 toxicities at prevalence > 10% were encountered and the overall toxicity profile of the combination was reflective of standard G+C toxicity profile. At data cut-off, preliminary efficacy evaluation demonstrated disease control rate (CR+PR+SD) of 64% (PR:32%, SD:32% and CR:0%), along with median progression-free survival (PFS) of 5 months (range 0-14 months). PK analyses showed no evidence of drug-drug interactions between G, C and CX-4945. Conclusions: RP2D for G+C with CX-4945 is DL5 (CX-4945 dosed on days 0,1,2 and 7,8,9 at 1000 mg PO bid with standard G and C dosing). Preliminary clinical efficacy and tolerability of the regimen support planned controlled, randomized Phase 2 evaluation. Clinical trial information: NCT02128282.

Abstract Purpose: To determine the MTD and to assess the safety, tolerability, and potential activity of LB-100, a first-in-class small-molecule inhibitor of protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A) in adult patients with progressive solid tumors. Experimental Design: LB-100 was administered intravenously daily for 3 days in 21-day cycles in a 3 + 3 dose escalation design. Results: There were 29 patient entries over 7 dose escalations. One patient stopped treatment after one dose because of an acute infection and was reenrolled after recovery; each course was analyzed as a separate patient entry. Two patients had dose-limiting toxicity (reversible increases in serum creatinine or calculated serum creatinine clearance) at the 3.1 mg/m2 level. Probable or possible study drug-related grade 3 adverse events occurred in 6 (20.7%) patients [anemia (n = 2), decreased creatinine clearance, dyspnea, hyponatremia, and lymphopenia]. Ten (50%) of 20 response-evaluable patients had stable disease for four or more cycles. One patient with pancreatic adenocarcinoma had a partial response noted after 10 cycles, which was maintained for five additional cycles. The other patients achieving stable disease had one of the following: fibrosarcoma, chondrosarcoma, thymoma, atypical carcinoid of lung, or ovarian, testicular, breast (n = 2), and prostate cancer. The recommended phase II dose of LB-100 is 2.33 mg/m2 daily for 3 days every 3 weeks. Conclusions: The safety, tolerability, preliminary evidence of antitumor activity, and novel mechanism of action of LB-100 support its continued development alone and in combination with other therapies. Clin Cancer Res; 23(13); 3277–84. ©2016 AACR.

Abstract Background Protein phosphatase (PP2A) is a multifunctional protein involved in regulation of cell cycle, DNA-damage response, and apoptosis. LB-100, a novel small molecule inhibitor of PP2A, inhibits the growth of a broad spectrum of leukemic and solid tumor cell lines. In addition, LB100 potentiates the effectiveness of cytotoxic drugs (cisplatin, docetaxel, doxorubicin, temozolomide) and radiation without significant increases in toxicity. The predominant mechanisms responsible for potentiation are inhibition of mitotic exit and homologous recombination repair. Methods This is an open label, first-time-in-human, multicenter, phase 1 study of LB-100 in patients with advanced cancer refractory to standard therapies. The first part of the study determines the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of LB-100 as a single agent when given intravenously days 1-3 every 21 days. Utilizing a standard 3+3 design, patients (pts) are evaluated for dose limiting toxicities (DLT) through 2 cycles. Once the single agent MTD is determined, the dose will be reduced by 2 dose levels (DL) and combined with docetaxel given on day 2. Escalation will continue until the MTD of the combination is determined. Plasma sampling for pharmacokinetics of LB-100 will be collected on days 1 and 3 of cycle 1 in the MTD confirmation cohort. Results The starting dose of LB-100 was 0.25 mg/m2 and 21 pts have enrolled in part 1 of the study through six dose levels. At DL6, pts received 2.33 mg/m2 and no DLTs have been observed. One pt with metastatic colon cancer at DL6 had a grade 2 creatinine after 2 doses that resolved with hydration. This was related to LB-100 and the study was amended to increase the volume and infusion time. One pt on DL3 with stage 4 pancreas cancer had stable disease through 15 cycles of treatment and another pt on DL5 with metastatic thymoma remains on treatment through 8 cycles. Stable disease for 4-6 cycles was also observed in breast, ovarian, carcinoid and testicular cancer patients. Conclusions Rb and p53 mutations are common in malignancies leading to chromosomal instability and overexpression of the mitotic checkpoint gene Mad2. PP2A inhibition results in synthetic lethality of cancer cells overexpressing Mad2 which may be a biomarker for LB100 responsiveness. Through 6 DLs, LB-100 has been well tolerated without any DLTs and early activity has been observed with stabilization of disease in a wide variety of cancers. Correlative studies for biomarkers of response are planned. Clinical trial identifier: NCTO1837667 Citation Format: Vincent Chung, Donald Richards, Fadi Braiteh, John S. Kovach, Aaron Scott Mansfield. A phase 1 study of a novel inhibitor of protein phosphatase 2A alone or in combination with docetaxel. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR-NCI-EORTC International Conference: Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics; 2015 Nov 5-9; Boston, MA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Ther 2015;14(12 Suppl 2):Abstract nr A175.

Purpose To compare the progression-free survival (PFS) using a treatment regimen selected by molecular profiling (MP) of a patient's tumor with the PFS for the most recent regimen on which the patient had experienced progression (ie, patient as his own control). Patients and Methods Patients with refractory metastatic cancer had tissue samples submitted for MP in two formats including formalin-fixed tissue for immunohistochemistry and fluorescent in situ hybridization assays and immediately frozen tissue for oligonucleotide microarray (MA) gene expression assays (all performed in a Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments [ CLIA ] –certified laboratory). The MP approach was deemed of clinical benefit for the individual patient who had a PFS ratio (PFS on MP-selected therapy/PFS on prior therapy) of ≥ 1.3. Results In 86 patients who had MP attempted, there was a molecular target detected in 84 (98%). Sixty-six of the 84 patients were treated according to MP results. Eighteen (27%) of 66 patients had a PFS ratio of ≥ 1.3 (95% CI, 17% to 38%; one-sided, one-sample P = .007). Therefore, the null hypothesis (that ≤ 15% of this patient population would have a PFS ratio of ≥ 1.3) was rejected. Conclusion It is possible to identify molecular targets in patients' tumors from nine different centers across the United States. In 27% of patients, the MP approach resulted in a longer PFS on an MP-suggested regimen than on the regimen on which the patient had just experienced progression. Issues to be considered in interpretation of this study include limited prior experience with patients as their own controls as a study end point and overall patient attrition.