Citations

AbstractThe severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) represents a new public health problem, with a total of 10.577.263 documented COVID‐19 cases worldwide and 513.441 deaths up to the present date. Few cases of disease‐related cutaneous manifestations have been reported in the literature, and such manifestations are scarce. Integumentary manifestations from COVID‐19 include exanthemas and papular dermatoses, urticarial eruptions, atopic dermatitis, vesiculobullous lesions and skin signs of hypercoagulable states, such as acral ischaemia, livedo and retiform purpura. Most common extracutaneous manifestations from the disease include headache, cough, anosmia, ageusia, fever, dyspnoea, nausea, diarrhoea and cardiovascular events. The objectives of this review were to discuss the role of human cell receptors described as interaction targets of SARS‐CoV‐2, as well to understand the current state of knowledge on skin expression of these receptors, in order to substantiate future research. The authors present a thorough literature review on SARS‐CoV‐2 and its possible interaction with cell receptors and human tissues including the skin. They discuss a molecular hypothesis to explain the lower prevalence of dermatological manifestations from direct SARS‐CoV‐2 infection. Distinct human cell receptors binding the virus appear to be less expressed in the skin compared to other organs. Additionally, the presence of resolvins and the disintegrin metalloprotease ADAM17 provide a putative protection to the skin, explaining the majority of COVID‐19 manifestations to be extracutaneous. This review represents an excellent opportunity for future studies using skin biopsies from COVID‐19 patients to investigate molecular expression in the pathophysiology of cutaneous manifestations of the disease.

Glossopharyngeal neuralgia (GN) is a rare pain syndrome caused by compression of the glossopharyngeal nerve. It is typically idiopathic and often goes misdiagnosed because of its similarities to trigeminal neuralgia. Vago-glossopharyngeal neuralgia, an even rarer subset of GN, occurs when the pain is accompanied by syncope and/or arrhythmia. Here, we present the case of a 54-year-old man with oropharyngeal cancer that metastasised to areas within his left carotid sheath. He presented with numerous intermittent episodes of pain, accompanied by vagal episodes. While this presentation is similarly described in prior case reports, our case is unique in that the syndrome occurred as a direct sequelae of a metastatic tumour completely encasing the left internal carotid artery.

BACKGROUNDAndrogenic alopecia (AGA) is a common hair loss disorder. Studies have demonstrated successful treatment with platelet-rich plasma (PRP) in men, but studies in women are few.OBJECTIVETo evaluate PRP in the treatment of AGA in women, compared with topical minoxidil.MATERIALS AND METHODSTwenty women with AGA received topical minoxidil for 12 weeks and injectable PRP for 12 weeks in a randomized crossover design with an 8-week washout between treatments. Standardized TrichoScan analysis and quality-of-life questionnaires were assessed at baseline and 12-week follow-up for each treatment.RESULTSAfter PRP, significant increases from baseline to Week 12 in TrichoScan analysis hair count (p= .002) and vellus hair density (p= .009) occurred. However, minoxidil resulted in significant increases in hair count (p< .001), vellus hair density (p= .03), terminal hair density (p= .004), and cumulative thickness (p= .004). Several quality of life responses improved from baseline to Week 12 after PRP treatment, whereas no improvements were noted after minoxidil.CONCLUSIONPlatelet-rich plasma is an effective treatment for hair regrowth in female AGA, although not as effective as minoxidil. However, the improved quality of life responses after PRP, but not minoxidil, suggest a potential overall greater degree of satisfaction with PRP.LEVELS OF EVIDENCEI.CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATIONNCT03488108.

AbstractThis viewpoint highlights major, partly controversial concepts about the pathogenesis of pemphigus. The monopathogenic theory explains intra‐epidermal blistering through the “desmoglein (Dsg) compensation” hypothesis, according to which an antibody‐dependent disabling of Dsg 1‐ and/or Dsg 3‐mediated cell–cell attachments of keratinocytes (KCs) is sufficient to disrupt epidermal integrity and cause blistering. The multipathogenic theory explains intra‐epidermal blistering through the “multiple hit” hypothesis stating that a simultaneous and synchronized inactivation of the physiological mechanisms regulating and/or mediating intercellular adhesion of KCs is necessary to disrupt epidermal integrity. The major premise for a multipathogenic theory is that a single type of autoantibody induces only reversible changes, so that affected KCs can recover due to a self‐repair. The damage, however, becomes irreversible when the salvage pathway and/or other cell functions are altered by a partnering autoantibody and/or other pathogenic factors. Future studies are needed to (i) corroborate these findings, (ii) characterize in detail patient populations with non‐Dsg‐specific autoantibodies, and (iii) determine the extent of the contribution of non‐Dsg antibodies in disease pathophysiology.