Citations

Clear

43 citation(s) found for "Kim, George".

Real-world comparative economics of a 12-gene assay for prognosis in stage II colon cancer.
Behrens, Robert J. , Renfro, Lindsay A. , Srivastava, Geetika , Soori, Gamini S. , Dakhil, Shaker R. , Mowat, Rex B., Kuebler, J. Phillip, Kim, George P., Mazurczak, Miroslaw, Hornberger, John , Alberts, Steven R. , Yu, Tiffany Hui‐Kuang

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Clinical Oncology | February 24, 2017 | Volume: 31 | Issue: 4_suppl | Pages: 391-391

10.1200/jco.2013.31.4_suppl.391 Get It

391 Background: Prior economic analysis of a 12-gene assay (Oncotype DX), compared with patterns of care reported in the NCCN database of patients with stage II, T3, DNA mismatch repair proficient (MMR-P) colon cancer, predicted that the assay would save medical costs and improve patient well-being (Hornberger et al., Value Health, 2012). This study assessed the validity of those findings with actual adjuvant chemotherapy (aCT) recommendations. Methods: Outcomes and costs were estimated for patients with stage II, T3, MMR-P colon cancer using a Markov model. A study of 141 patients from 17 sites in the Mayo Clinic Cancer Research Consortium collected data on aCT recommended before and after knowledge of the 12-gene assay results (Srivastava et al. abstract). Quality-adjusted life years (QALY) and medical resource use after recurrence were computed using guideline-validated state-transition probability estimation methods. Risk of progression and incidence of adverse events with different aCT regimens were based on published literature. Drug and administration costs for aCT were obtained from 2012 Medicare fee schedules. One-way sensitivity analyses were conducted to evaluate parameter influence on economic impact. Results: After receiving the 12-gene assay results, physician recommendations in favor of aCT decreased 22% (95% CI 11%-32%; McNemar test p<0.001) from 73 (52%) to 42 (30%) patients. Oxaliplatin aCT and 5-FU monotherapy recommendations each declined 11%. Average aCT costs decreased $5,738 for drugs, $668 for administration, and $3,268 for adverse events management. Overall, average total direct medical costs decreased $4,203. The net effect on average patient well-being was a gain of 0.083 QALYs. Total medical costs are most influenced by change in aCT recommendations, 5-FU monotherapy efficacy, and oxaliplatin drug acquisition cost. Savings are expected to persist even if the cost of oxaliplatin dropped by >75% due to generic substitution. Conclusions: The 12-gene assayhas been shown to alter aCT recommendations for patients with stage II, T3, MMR-P colon cancer. This study provides real-world confirmation that these changes in aCT reduce direct medical costs and improve patient well-being.
Phase II consortium (P2C) study of gemcitabine and tanespimycin (17AAG) for metastatic pancreatic cancer.
Foster, Nathan R. , Erlichman, Charles , Kim, George P., McWilliams, Robert R. , Wang‐Gillam, Andrea

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Clinical Oncology | February 24, 2017 | Volume: 31 | Issue: 4_suppl | Pages: 245-245

10.1200/jco.2013.31.4_suppl.245 Get It

245 Background: Gemcitabine (GEM) monotherapy for PDA has modest activity. 17-N-Allylamino-17-demthoxygeldanamycin (Tanespimycin/17AAG), is an HSP90 inhibitor, which results in degradation of a number of client proteins such as RAF and Akt. Arlander et al (J Biol Chem. 2003 278:52572-7) have demonstrated that 17AAG targeting of HSP90 leads to Chk1 degradation. Chk1 is upregulated with GEM treatment which affects cell survival (Karnitz et al. Mol Pharmacol. 2005 68:1636-44). In vitro, the combination demonstrated in vitro synergy. Thus the potential clinical activity in pancreatic cancer of the combination was explored. Methods: A phase II multicenter prospective study was performed using GEM 750 mg/m2 d1,8 and 17AAG 154 mg/m2 d2,9 on a 21 day cycle, as defined in a previous phase I trial. Patients with stage IV PDA, with adequate liver, kidney function and counts, ECOG 0-2 and no prior therapy for metastatic disease were eligible. The primary endpoint of 60% overall survival at 6 months was considered of clinical interest. Sixty-six patients were planned for accrual, and an interim analysis was planned after 25 evaluable patients. Informed, written consent was obtained from all pts. Results: Due to lack of drug availability and failure to achieve the planned endpoint, accrual was halted at 21 pts, enrolled from 5/08 to 9/10, of which 20 were evaluable (1 cancelled prior to treatment). Median age was 61.5 yrs., 55% were male, PS 0 (50%), 1 (45%), 2 (5%); 95% were non-Hispanic white, 1 was African American. Two had received adjuvant therapy for PDA. Tolerability was moderate, with 13 pts (65%) having > grade 3 adverse event (AE), with 15% gr 4 AEs and 0% gr 5. Nausea (20%), vomiting (20%), constipation (15%), dehydration (15%), and anorexia (10%), were the most common non-heme AEs. Lymphopenia (15%), leukopenia (10%) and neutropenia (10%) were common grade 3 hematologic AEs. No complete or partial responses were seen. 40% of patients were alive at 6 months, with a median OS of 5.4 months. Conclusions: HSP 90 inhibitor 17AAG in combination with GEM does not show activity for treatment of PDA. Further trials should not be pursued with this combination. Supported by N01-CM-62205. Clinical trial information: NCT00577889.
Survival and toxicity with intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and chemotherapy for esophageal carcinoma, with or without surgery.
Kowalchik, Kristin, Kim, George P., Smith, C. Daniel , Paryani, Nitesh N., Johnson, Elizabeth Anne , Kim, Siyong , Ko, Stephen J.

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Clinical Oncology | February 24, 2017 | Volume: 31 | Issue: 4_suppl | Pages: 125-125

10.1200/jco.2013.31.4_suppl.125 Get It

125 Background: Treatment for locally advanced esophageal carcinoma is radiation and chemotherapy, with or without surgery. Radiation has traditionally been delivered with 3D conformal radiation therapy (3D CRT). This study evaluates late toxicity in patients treated with IMRT as well as early outcomes and acute toxicity. Methods: This is a retrospective review of 32 patients with esophageal carcinoma treated with IMRT at Mayo Clinic Florida from 2008 -2012. Pathology includes squamous cell and adenocarcinomas. Tumor sites include middle and lower thoracic and GE junction. Clinical stages are TX-T3, N0-3, M0-1. All patients received at least one cycle of concurrent chemotherapy. IMRT dose was 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions prescribed to a target volume including the tumor and regional lymphatics. IMRT plans utilized coplaner beams in a 7-9 beam arrangement or volumetric modulated arc therapy. Results: Median follow-up is 8.9 months (range 2.4-23.0) for all patients and 13.1 months (range 2.8-23.0 months) in surviving patients. Median patient age is 69 (range 46-87). Trimodality treatment was completed in 20 patients (62.5%). Surgery was either an open or minimally invasive esophagogastrectomy. The incidence of grade 3 or greater late toxicity at 1 year was 48% in surgery patients and 26% in non-surgery patients. The most common grade 3 or higher toxicity was esophageal strictures in 25%. The incidence of any grade 3 or greater acute toxicity was 65% in the surgery patients and 75% in the non-surgery patients. Overall survival (OS) for all patients at 18 months is 57% (CI 37-86%) and progression-free survival (PFS) is 60% (36-99%). OS and PFS for trimodality therapy at 12 months is 83% (66-100%) and 81% (63-100%) respectively and for bimodality therapy is 34% (12-93%) and 70% (33-100%) respectively. Conclusions: Increased late toxicity occurs in surgery patients, and increased acute toxicity in non-surgery patients. Lower survival in non-surgery patients may be due to early progression, morbidities which preclude surgery or improved survival with surgery. Overall, IMRT is a feasible treatment modality, which may be equally efficacious to 3D CRT for the treatment of esophageal carcinoma.
North Central Cancer Treatment Group phase II study of panitumumab (Pmab), chemotherapy, and external beam radiation (Chemo-RT) in patients with locally advanced (LA) pancreatic cancer.
Kim, George P., Foster, Nathan R. , Haddock, Michael G. , Bollinger, John, Dakhil, Shaker R. , Behrens, Robert J. , Flynn, Patrick J. , Steen, Preston D. , Bury, Martin J., Stella, Philip J., Alberts, Steven R.

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Clinical Oncology | February 23, 2017 | Volume: 30 | Issue: 4_suppl | Pages: 271-271

10.1200/jco.2012.30.4_suppl.271 Get It

271 Background: Epidermal growth factor inhibitors show some benefit in the treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer. A trial to evaluate the incorporation of Pmab into a conventional multimodality regimen and continuation as maintenance therapy was conducted in pts with LA disease. Methods: Pts with ECOG PS 0-1, preserved organ function and tumor encompassed within standard radiation fields were eligible. Pmab 6 mg/kg on days 1, 15, 29 and continuous infusion 5-FU 225 mg/m2/d or capecitabine 825 mg/m2 were given with RT. Pts then received weekly gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 and Pmab on days 1, 15 for three 4-week cycles. Maintenance Pmab was then continued for additional 6 months. RT consisted of 45 Gy to the tumor and regional nodes with a 5.4 Gy boost using conformal techniques. Primary endpoint of one-year survival (OS) with secondary endpoints progression-free survival (PFS), confirmed tumor response, and adverse events (at least possibly related) are reported. Results: 51 pts (23 M: 28 F) were enrolled with a median age of 65 (range: 43-84). Twenty-two pts (43%) received at least 1 cycle of post-chemo-RT, while 29 patients only received chemo-RT. All 51 pts have ended treatment with pts going off study because of: progression (39%), adverse events (27%), refusal (25%), and other reasons (8%). Frequently occurring maximum grade 3/4 AEs across the entire treatment course (chemo-RT + post-chemo-RT chemo) are shown below. With a median follow-up of 12.3 months, survival at 12 months is 50.2% (95% CI: 37.9-66.5%), median survival 12.1 mos (95% CI: 6.8-15.9) and median PFS 7.4 mos (95% CI: 3.7-8.6). Confirmed response rate was 5.9% (1-CR, 2-PR). Conclusions: The addition of Pmab to a conventional chemo-RT regimen provides benefit in terms of median survival. This is similar to reports of other EGFR inhibitors in LA disease. Adverse events, especially during the chemo-RT portion, were considerable and affected administration of subsequent systemic maintenance therapy. [Table: see text]
Combination epigenetic therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) with subcutaneous 5-azacitidine and entinostat: a phase 2 consortium/stand Up 2 cancer study
Azad, Nilofer S. , Yin, Jun , Oberg, Ann L. , Flynn, Patrick J. , Adkins, Douglas, Sharma, Anup , Weisenberger, Daniel J. , Brown, Thomas D. , Medvari, Prakriti, Jones, Peter A. , Easwaran, Hariharan , Kamel, Ihab R. , Bahary, Nathan , Kim, George , Pitot, Henry C., Erlichman, Charles , Donehower, Ross C. , Baylin, Stephen B. , Ahuja, Nita , El-Khoueiry, Anthony B. , Adkins, Douglas, Picus, Joel , Shen, Hui , Laird, Peter W. , Piekarz, Richard

Mayo Clinic

Oncotarget | February 7, 2017 | Volume: 8 | Issue: 21 | Pages: 35326-35338

10.18632/oncotarget.15108 | PMID 28186961 Get It

Phase I Study of DMOT4039A, an Antibody–Drug Conjugate Targeting Mesothelin, in Patients with Unresectable Pancreatic or Platinum-Resistant Ovarian Cancer
Weekes, Colin D. , Lamberts, Laetitia E., Voortman, Johannes, Diamond, Jennifer R. , Vries, Elisabeth G.E. de , Verheul, Henk M.W. , Kim, George P., Wang, Yulei , Scales, Suzie J. , Samineni, Divya , Brunstein, Flávia, Choi, YounJeong, Maslyar, Daniel, Colón‐Otero, Gerardo , McWilliams, Robert R. , Borad, Mitesh J. , Lieu, Christopher H. , de Vries, Elisabeth G E

Mayo Clinic

Molecular Cancer Therapeutics | January 29, 2016 | Volume: 15 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 439-447

10.1158/1535-7163.mct-15-0693 | PMID 26823490 Get It

Abstract DMOT4039A, a humanized anti-mesothelin mAb conjugated to the antimitotic agent monomethyl auristatin E (MMAE), was given to patients with pancreatic and ovarian cancer every 3 weeks (0.2–2.8 mg/kg; q3w) or weekly (0.8–1.2 mg/kg). A 3+3 design was used for dose escalation followed by expansion at the recommended phase II dose (RP2D) to evaluate safety and pharmacokinetics. Antitumor response was evaluated per RECIST 1.1 and serum CA19-9 or CA125 declines. Tumor mesothelin expression was determined by IHC. Seventy-one patients (40 pancreatic cancer; 31 ovarian cancer) were treated with DMOT4039A. For the q3w schedule (n = 54), the MTD and RP2D was 2.4 mg/kg, with dose-limiting toxicities of grade 3 hyperglycemia and grade 3 hypophosphatemia at 2.8 mg/kg. For the weekly schedule (n = 17), the maximum assessed dose was 1.2 mg/kg, with further dose escalations deferred because of toxicities limiting scheduled retreatment in later cycles, and therefore the RP2D level for the weekly regimen was determined to be 1 mg/kg. Across both schedules, the most common toxicities were gastrointestinal and constitutional. Treatment-related serious adverse events occurred in 6 patients; 4 patients continued treatment following dose reductions. Drug exposure as measured by antibody-conjugated MMAE and total antibody was generally dose proportional over all dose levels on both schedules. A total of 6 patients had confirmed partial responses (4 ovarian; 2 pancreatic) with DMOT4039A at 2.4 to 2.8 mg/kg i.v. q3w. DMOT4039A administered at doses up to 2.4 mg/kg q3w and 1.0 mg/kg weekly has a tolerable safety profile and antitumor activity in both pancreatic and ovarian cancer. Mol Cancer Ther; 15(3); 439–47. ©2016 AACR.
Abstract B102: A phase 2, open-label study of the PARP inhibitor rucaparib in patients with pancreatic cancer and a known deleterious BRCA mutation
Hendifar, Andrew , Shroff, Rachna T. , Leichman, Lawrence, Epelbaum, Ron, Geva, Ravit , Kim, George , Wolff, Robert A. , Allen, Andrew R., Giordano, Heidi, Raponi, Mitch , Isaacson, Jeff, Rolfe, Lindsey, Vonderheide, Robert H. , Domchek, Susan M. , McWilliams, Robert R. , Alberts, Steven R. , Isaacson, Jeffrey D., Biankin, Andrew V.

Mayo Clinic

Cancer Research | October 5, 2015 | Volume: 75 | Issue: 13_Supplement | Pages: B102-B102

10.1158/1538-7445.panca2014-b102 Get It

Abstract Background: Despite the recent progress made with front-line treatment for advanced pancreatic cancer (PC), most patients (pts) will either relapse or be refractory to treatment. Others may not even be eligible due to the toxicity profile of the available options or due to clinical deterioration. Once the disease progresses following front-line treatment, there is no accepted standard of care. Treatment options are clearly needed for patients with refractory disease. Approximately 5% of unselected PC pts, 10% of PC patients of Ashkenazi Jewish descent, and up to 19% of familial PC cases, harbor a germline BRCA mutation. Though less well characterized to date, somatic BRCA mutations also appear to play a significant role in PC. Clinical data have shown that pts with BRCA-mutant (BRCAmut) tumors, including those with PC, respond to treatment with a PARP inhibitor (PARPi). Early data suggest that other genomic characteristics may be surrogate biomarkers of homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) and define a larger group of responders than just BRCA mutation(s) alone. Rucaparib, an oral PARPi, is being developed for treatment of cancers associated with HRD due to a BRCA mutation or other homologous recombination pathway defect. Rucaparib has a desirable PK profile, is well tolerated, and has demonstrated clinical activity (RECIST and/or CA-125 responses) in patients with BRCAmut pancreatic, ovarian, or breast cancer in an ongoing Phase 1/2 study (NCT01482715). Three studies are currently ongoing in ovarian cancer and a trial in BRCAmut pancreatic cancer is now planned. The clinical activity of PARPi, including rucaparib, in BRCAmut PC, combined with the paucity of active 2nd-line therapies, support evaluation of rucaparib in PC pts with a BRCA mutation. Methods: Study CO-338-023 (NCT02042378) is a single-arm, open-label Phase 2 trial of continuous monotherapy rucaparib in up to 100 pts with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (or related subtype) who are known to harbor a deleterious BRCA mutation (germline or somatic). Pts must have received at least 1, but no more than 2, prior regimens for locally advanced or metastatic disease and have relapsed / progressive disease confirmed by radiologic assessment, or are no longer able to tolerate chemotherapy due to toxicity, and radiologic assessment confirms stable or progressive disease. Other key inclusion criteria include measurable disease, ECOG Performance Status 0 or 1, and adequate organ function. Pts with endocrine tumors or who received prior PARPi treatment are excluded. Pts will take 600 mg BID rucaparib continuously and be evaluated for safety every 2–4 wks, disease status (CT scans, CA19–9) every 4–8 wks until disease progression, and then for survival every 4 wks. Blood and archival tumor tissue (if available) will be collected from all pts. The primary endpoint is ORR by RECIST v1.1. Key secondary endpoints include duration of response, PFS, OS, and safety. Exploratory analyses include gene sequence and structural rearrangements of tumor DNA and evaluation of circulating tumor DNA. A group sequential interim monitoring plan will be implemented to stop the study early for either superior efficacy or futility. Interim analyses will occur after every 10th patient enrolled has sufficient disease assessment data available. If robust activity is observed in the BRCAmut PC population, the trial may be broadened to include PC pts with HRD due to other than a BRCA mutation. The trial will be open to enrollment at clinical sites in the US and Israel in 2Q 2014. Citation Format: Susan M. Domchek, Robert McWilliams, Andrew Hendifar, Rachna T. Shroff, Lawrence Leichman, Ron Epelbaum, Ravit Geva, George Kim, Steven R. Alberts, Robert A. Wolff, Andrew Allen, Heidi Giordano, Mitch Raponi, Jeff Isaacson, Lindsey Rolfe, Andrew Biankin, Robert H. Vonderheide. A phase 2, open-label study of the PARP inhibitor rucaparib in patients with pancreatic cancer and a known deleterious BRCA mutation. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on Pancreatic Cancer: Innovations in Research and Treatment; May 18-21, 2014; New Orleans, LA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(13 Suppl):Abstract nr B102.
Use of Adjuvant Cisplatin-Based Versus Carboplatin-Based Chemotherapy in Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Findings From the Florida Initiative for Quality Cancer Care
Lee, Ji‐Hyun , Fulp, William J. , Schreiber, Fred, Brown, R. H. , Levine, Richard M., Cartwright, Thomas H. , Abesada‐Terk, Guillermo, Kim, George P., Alemany, Carlos, Faig, Douglas, Sharp, Philip, Markham, Merry Jennifer , Malafa, Mokenge P. , Jacobsen, Paul B. , Tanvetyanon, Tawee , Brown, Richard H, Abesada-Terk, Guillermo, Sharp, Philip V, Malafa, Mokenge, Brown, Richard H., Markham, Merry J

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Oncology Practice | July 17, 2015 | Volume: 11 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 332-337

10.1200/jop.2014.001750 | PMID 25991639 Get It

In this study, academic practice status and treatment year predicted use of adjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy.
Florida Initiative for Quality Cancer Care: Changes in Psychosocial Quality of Care Indicators Over a 3-Year Interval
Jacobsen, Paul B. , Lee, Ji‐Hyun , Fulp, William J. , Siegel, Erin M. , Shibata, David , Laronga, Christine , Gray, Jhanelle E. , Schreiber, Fred, Brown, R. H. , Levine, Richard M., Cartwright, Thomas H. , Abesada‐Terk, Guillermo, Kim, George , Alemany, Carlos, Faig, Douglas, Sharp, Philip, Markham, Merry Jennifer , Malafa, Mokenge P. , Fulp, William, Gray, Jhanelle, Tanvetyanon, Tawee , BROWN, RICHARD, Levine, Richard, Cartwright, Thomas, Abesada-Terk, Guillermo, Malafa, Mokenge, Markham, Merry J

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Oncology Practice | February 26, 2015 | Volume: 11 | Issue: 1 | Pages: e103-e109

10.1200/jop.2014.001525 | PMID 25352389 Get It

Findings suggest that more intensive efforts than audit and feedback will be required to improve the quality of psychosocial care, and that greater recognition of problems with emotional well-being may tax the ability of practices to link patients with appropriate services.
Changes in the Care of Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer After Audit and Feedback: The Florida Initiative for Quality Cancer Care
Lee, Ji‐Hyun , Fulp, William J. , Schreiber, Fred, Brown, R. H. , Levine, Richard M., Cartwright, Thomas H. , Abesada‐Terk, Guillermo, Kim, George P., Alemany, Carlos, Faig, Douglas, Sharp, Philip, Markham, Merry Jennifer , Malafa, Mokenge P. , Jacobsen, Paul B. , Tanvetyanon, Tawee , Brown, Richard H, Abesada-Terk, Guillermo, Sharp, Philip V, Malafa, Mokenge, Markham, Merry J

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Oncology Practice | July 18, 2014 | Volume: 10 | Issue: 4 | Pages: e247-e254

10.1200/jop.2013.001275 | PMID 24737876 Get It

This study is among the first to report on the use of audit and feedback to improve medical oncology practices specifically for the processes of care in NSCLC. A modest but important improvement was observed between 2006 and 2009.