Citations

Background The Woven EndoBridge (WEB) device is an effective treatment for wide‐neck aneurysms (WNA). This study aims to identify and compare anatomical and procedural factors that predicts the aneurysm occlusion, both adequate and inadequate after WEB device treatment. Methods A systematic review and meta‐analysis were conducted using PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science, including studies up to October 25, 2024. Data on angiographic outcomes of WEB occlusion were extracted and analyzed using R version 4.4.2 Results Nine studies (790 patients) were included. Female patients were 1.64 times more likely to achieve adequate occlusion than males (OR: 1.64, 95% CI: [1.06, 2.52], p = 0.026). Regular‐shaped aneurysms had a 2.44‐fold higher likelihood of adequate occlusion compared to irregular ones (OR: 0.41, 95% CI: [0.23, 0.74]). Aneurysm neck size was significantly smaller in the adequate occlusion group (3.9 mm vs. 4.4 mm, MD: ‐0.48 mm, 95% CI: [‐0.78, ‐0.18], p = 0.002). Maximum aneurysm diameter was also smaller in the adequate occlusion group (5.7 mm vs. 6.8 mm, MD: ‐1.13 mm, 95% CI: [‐1.69, ‐0.57], p < 0.001). Aneurysm height was also significantly lower than the inadequate occlusion group (5.4 mm vs. 6.3 mm, MD: ‐0.92 mm, 95% CI: [‐1.55, ‐0.29], p = 0.004). Conclusion Smaller aneurysm dimensions, regular shape, and female gender were associated with higher adequate occlusion rates after WEB treatment. These findings may guide patient selection strategies for optimizing aneurysm occlusion. Further high‐quality studies are needed to confirm these associations. image image

Background Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) is a well-established treatment for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) due to large vessel occlusion (LVO). However, its role in cervical artery dissection-related (CeAD) LVO remains debated due to anatomical complexities and procedural challenges. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to evaluate the safety, efficacy, and clinical outcomes of MT in patients with AIS due to CeAD-related LVO compared with other AIS etiologies. Methods PubMed, Embase, and Scopus were systematically searched from inception to March 2025. Comparative observational studies evaluating the use of MT in adult patients with AIS due to LVO were included, specifically those comparing outcomes in patients with CeAD versus non-CeAD etiologies. Results MT for CeAD-related AIS showed no statistically significant difference in successful recanalization compared with non-CeAD cases (OR 0.81 (95% CI 0.63 to 1.04), P=0.10). However, patients with CeAD-related AIS had significantly higher rates of 90-day functional independence (modified Rankin Scale score 0–2) (OR 2.17 (95% CI 1.55 to 3.05), P<0.01) and lower 90-day mortality (OR 0.34 (95% CI 0.22 to 0.53), P<0.01). Rates of distal embolization (OR 1.60 (95% CI 0.69 to 3.70), P=0.27), symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (OR 0.84 (95% CI 0.51 to 1.38), P=0.49), or iatrogenic dissection (OR 1.58 (95% CI 0.59 to 4.22), P=0.36) did not differ significantly between patient groups. Conclusions MT in patients with CeAD-related LVO is safe, effective, and associated with improved functional outcomes and lower mortality compared with patients with non-CeAD acute ischemic causes.

Background For large vessel occlusion (LVO) ischemic strokes, three major techniques of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) have demonstrated efficacy. Here we compare the safety and efficacy of stent retrievers (SR), contact aspiration (Asp), and a combined mechanical thrombectomy (cMT) for LVO ischemic stroke. Methods Using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, we queried the PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, and Web of Science databases for studies published prior to December 2024 describing patients with ischemic stroke who underwent MT using SR, Asp, or cMT. Results Twnety-four studies comprising a total of 12 845 patients were included in the analysis. Compared with cMT, Asp was associated with a lower rate of first pass effect (FPE) (risk ratio (RR) 0.67; 95% CI 0.46 to 0.96), shorter procedure duration (mean difference (MD) −13.35 min; 95% CI −20.83 to –5.87), and lower risk of arterial dissection (RR 0.50; 95% CI 0.29 to 0.87). Additionally, SR use was linked to a higher procedure duration compared with Asp (MD 13.39 min; 95% CI 5.55 to 21.22) and a lower symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage rate (RR 0.75; 95% CI 0.59 to 0.96). No significant differences were observed between groups in terms of number of passes, successful recanalization, 90-day functional outcomes, mortality, arterial perforation, or embolization to new territory. Conclusions All three techniques demonstrated similar recanalization rates and functional outcomes. However, Asp was associated with shorter procedure times and fewer arterial dissection complications, while cMT showed a higher FPE. Given the comparable overall efficacy, the choice of technique should be guided by the physician’s preference, expertise, and confidence, tailored to the individual patient’s profile.

Purpose Large aneurysms have a higher rupture risk, yet no available in vivo animal model consistently produces large aneurysms for testing endovascular therapies. Recent research suggests that adding calcium chloride (CaCl 2 ) to elastase yields larger aneurysms in a surgical rabbit model. We evaluated whether this effect translates to an endovascular approach by comparing aneurysm sizes created using elastase alone versus a CaCl 2 –elastase combination. Methods Aneurysms were created in the right common carotid artery of New Zealand rabbits. One group received 1 mL porcine elastase; the other received elastase plus 0.055 g CaCl 2 (0.5 M). After four weeks, patency was confirmed via digital subtraction angiography. Two blinded co-authors measured the neck, width, and height of the aneurysms. Aneurysm volumes were estimated using AngioCalc.com. Statistical analyses were performed using either the Mann–Whitney U -test or t -test based on data distribution. Results Twenty-nine (29) New Zealand rabbits were included in the study: six in the CaCl 2 and elastase groups, 23 in the elastase-alone group. All induced aneurysms remained patent at follow-up. Mean neck size was significantly larger in the CaCl 2 + elastase group than in the elastase-alone group (4.4 ± 1.1 mm vs 3.5 ± 0.95 mm; respectively, p = 0.02). Differences in width (4.1 ± 0.92 mm vs 3.4 ± 0.36 mm; p = 0.06), height (9.0 ± 1.1 mm vs 9.1 ± 2.1 mm; p = 0.46), and volume (83.5 ± 38.35 mm ³ vs 53.0 ± 16.94 mm³; p = 0.11) were not significant between CaCl 2 + elastase and elastase-alone, respectively. Conclusions CaCl 2 modestly increased neck size but did not significantly enlarge overall aneurysm dimensions. Further studies are needed to assess its utility in endovascular aneurysm models.

Background/Objectives: Idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) often features dural venous sinus stenosis; venous sinus stenting (VSS) improves venous outflow and intracranial pressure, but most stents are off-label, and few are engineered for intracranial venous anatomy. The aim was to synthesize animal models relevant to IIH/VSS, catalogue stents used clinically for VSS and summarize corresponding animal data, appraise current preclinical VSS research, and propose a pragmatic preclinical evaluation framework. Methods: We performed a targeted search (PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus; through to May 2025), dual-screened the records in Nested Knowledge, and extracted the model/device characteristics and outcomes as per the predefined criteria. Results: We identified 65 clinical VSS studies; most were retrospective and used off-label carotid/peripheral/biliary stents (Precise, Zilver, and Wallstent were the most frequent). Recent dedicated systems (River, BosStent) have limited animal evidence; VIVA has GLP porcine venous peripheral data demonstrating its patency, structural integrity, and benign healing outcomes. Rodent models reproduce obesity/androgen drivers with modest, sustained ICP elevation; large animal models show the technical feasibility of in sinus implantation, but no chronic focal venous stenosis model fully mirrors the IIH condition. Conclusions: Despite broad clinical uptake, the translational underpinnings of VSS in IIH remain incomplete: most devices lack intracranial venous-specific preclinical validation, and there is no existing animal model that recapitulates both IIH biology and focal sinus stenosis.

Background Guide catheter (GC) placement, whether distal or proximal, may influence the efficacy and safety of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) due to large vessel occlusion (LVO). However, definitions of placement and procedural strategies vary across studies, limiting clarity. Methods We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science from inception to September 1, 2024. Comparative studies of adult patients with anterior circulation AIS-LVO undergoing MT that reported GC placement were included. Both balloon GCs (BGCs) and non-BGCs were eligible. Data were pooled using random-effects models in R. Outcomes included functional independence (modified Rankin Scale 0–2 at 90 days), successful reperfusion (modified thrombolysis in cerebral infarction ≥2b or expanded thrombolysis in cerebral infarction ≥2c), first-pass recanalization (FPR), mortality, puncture-to-recanalization (PTR) time, and complications. Subgroup analyses were performed by thrombectomy technique and catheter type. Results Seven retrospective studies comprising 2148 patients (1042 proximal, 1106 distal) were analyzed. Distal placement was associated with higher rates of functional independence (risk ratio (RR): 1.25, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.10–1.42), successful reperfusion (RR: 1.13, 95% CI: 1.04–1.22), and FPR (RR: 1.35, 95% CI: 1.15–1.58), as well as lower 90-day mortality (RR: 0.52, 95% CI: 0.28–0.82). PTR time was shorter with distal placement (mean difference: −7.7 min, 95% CI: −10.8 to −4.6). No significant differences were observed for symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (RR: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.55–1.65) or emboli to new territory (RR: 0.84, 95% CI: 0.28–2.52). Benefits were consistent across both BGCs and non-BGCs. Heterogeneity existed in outcome definitions and techniques, and publication bias could not be excluded. Conclusions Distal GC placement is associated with improved reperfusion, efficiency, and functional outcomes in MT for anterior circulation AIS-LVO, without increased complications. Given the retrospective nature of included studies, anatomic confounding, and inconsistent outcome definitions, findings should be considered preliminary. Multicenter trials are needed to confirm whether catheter position independently predicts MT outcomes.

Purpose Aneurysmal rupture and subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) have an exceptionally high mortality and morbidity burden. The aim of this study was to develop interpretable machine learning models for predicting short-term poor outcomes defined by the National Inpatient Sample Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Outcome Measure (NIS-SOM). Methods The National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database was queried from 2008 to 2018 to identify patients diagnosed with SAH who had undergone endovascular coiling or clipping for intracranial aneurysm. Demographic, comorbidity, risk factor, and hospital characteristic variables were recorded. Variables were preprocessed, and the feature space was reduced to include the most important features. To predict poor outcomes, machine learning models were trained and cross-validated before being evaluated on a separate testing set. Shapley Additive exPlanations of the best performing model was used for general and local model interpretation. Results Among 18,149 admissions (mean age 55 ± 14 years, 68.8% women), 52.9% had a poor outcome. Test-set AUCs ranged 0.74–0.80; a multilayer perceptron performed best (AUC 0.80, precision 0.74, recall 0.82). SHAP ranked the ten most influential variables: age, neurological comorbidity, paralysis, Medicare insurance, smoking status, Elixhauser burden, fluid-electrolyte disorders, weight loss, arrhythmia, and heart failure. Conclusions The modeling predicted nationwide aSAH prognosis with decent accuracy and highlighted clinical, socioeconomic, and system-level drivers of determinants of poor short-term outcome. These results support the potential of explainable ML tools as complementary tools for early risk stratification, guiding resource allocation, and informing prospective multi-center validation and implementation studies.