Citations

1037 Background: TBCRC041, a randomized phase 2 trial of alisertib (A) ± fulvestrant (F) in women with HR+/HER2- MBC demonstrated promising clinical activity for alisertib (1). Interrogation of baseline (PreC1) and end of cycle 1 (EOC1) cfDNA and CTCs may identify biomarkers associated with response to A±F. Methods: Plasma cfDNA was sequenced using the Guardant INFINITY platform, which includes genomic and methylated tumor fraction (mTF) analysis. Pathogenic variants were determined using publicly available databases and Mayo Clinic annotation pipelines. CTCs were identified as nucleated, EpCAM+/ cytokeratin+/ CD45- cells and assessed for ER/HER2 staining (RareCyte, Seattle). PFS was defined as the time from randomization to progression or death. EOC1-PFS differs from PFS as time starts at C2D1. Stratified log-rank tests and conditional Cox modeling were used to assess whether PFS or EOC1-PFS differed by mutations in ESR1 or PIK3CA, pre-CTC ≥ 5, or mTF>1%. Results: Of the 91 eligible pts, 84 progressed, and 73 were deceased. In the 86 pts with PreC1-cfDNA results, variants were identified in ESR1 (42; 48.8%), PIK3CA (36; 41.9%), AKT1 (7; 8.1%), PTEN(7; 8.1%), BRCA1 (4; 4.7%), and BRCA2 (7; 8.1%). Pts with a PIK3CAmut had significantly decreased PFS (HR 1.8; 95%CI: 1.1 -2.9, p=0.014) but not by ESR1mut status (p=0.583). PreC1 and EOC1-mTF were determined for 78 and 76 pts, respectively. PreC1-mTF was 0-1% in 21; 1.1-10.0% in 27; and 10.1-100% in 30. mTF levels remained between 0-1% in 17 pts fell to 0-1% in 11 pts, and was 0-1% in 5 pts without a preC1-mTF determination. PFS did not differ with respect to PreC1-mTF (p=0.210), but EOC1-PFS was worse in pts with mTF >1% (HR 3.0; 95%CI: 1.6 -5.2, p<0.001). PreC1 and EOC1-CTC were determined for 78 and 76 pts. 36 (46.2%) pts had a PreC1 CTC count ≥ 5. EOC1-CTC levels remained at (n=17) or increased to (n=1) ≥ 5 and was ≥ 5 in 2 pts without a preC1-CTC determination. EOC1-PFS was not significantly different for EOC1-CTC ≥ 5 (p=0.065), but was significantly decreased in pts with PreC1-CTC≥5 (HR=1.8; 95%CI: 1.1-3.0; p=0.018). Broader cfDNA NGS panel and CTC-derived ER/HER2 staining results will be presented at the meeting. Conclusions: Among patients receiving A±F, PFS varied based on the PIK3CAmutation status. cfDNA and CTC assessment PreC1 and EOC1 provided complementary information. Further validation in larger datasets is needed. 1. JAMA Oncol 2023;9:815. Clinical trial information: NCT02860000 .

567 Background: We proposed adjunctive statistical standardization of quantitated ER and PgR to improve inter-laboratory comparability of biomarker results and therapeutic management of breast cancer. Methods: We utilized CCTG MA.27 (NCT00066573), an adjuvant phase III trial of exemestane versus anastrozole in postmenopausal women with ER+ and/or PgR+ tumours. IHC ER and PgR HSCORE and % positivity (%+) were centrally assessed by machine image quantitation, and each statistically standardized to mean of 0, standard deviation of 1 following Box-Cox variance stabilization transformations of square for ER; for PgR, 1.) natural logarithm (0.1 added to 0 HSCOREs and 0 %+), 2.) square root. The primary endpoint was STEEP distant disease-free survival (DDFS) at the longest trial follow-up of median 4.1 years; a secondary endpoint was event-free survival (EFS). Survival was described with Kaplan-Meier plots and tested with the univariate Wilcoxon (Peto-Prentice) test statistic. We examined cut-points at standard deviations about mean of 0 (<-1; (-1,0]; (0,1]; >1) and explored single cut-points. Cox multivariate regressions were adjusted for age, T and N stage, grade, lymphovascular invasion, treatment, and baseline patient demographics; 2-sided Wald tests had nominal significance if p<0.05. Results: Of the 7576 women accrued, 3048 women had machine-quantitated image analysis results: 2900 (95%) for ER; 2726 (89%) for PgR. Statistically standardized HSCORE and %+ units differentiated both univariate DDFS and EFS; DDFS was significantly different by ER levels (p<0.001) and PgR levels (p<0.001). In multivariable assessments, ER HSCORE and %+ were not significantly associated (p=0.52-0.88) with the DDFS primary endpoint in models with PgR, while higher PgR HSCORE and %+ had significantly better DDFS (p=.001, in all instances) in models with ER. Conclusions: DDFS was superior for patients with higher ER and PgR standardized units compared with those with HSCOREs and %+ <-1. The adjunctive statistical standardization of ER and PgR performed here is similar to that mandated for clinical practice by the World Health Organization for BMD. [Table: see text]

513 Background: Adjuvant endocrine therapy (AET) improves overall survival (OS) in patients (pts) with hormone receptor (HR) positive early-stage breast cancer (BC). For pts with estrogen receptor (ER)-low BC (defined as ER 1-10%), there is controversy regarding AET benefit, given tumor heterogeneity (>40% basal; (1)), and similar chemotherapy response and prognosis to ER-negative (neg) BC. Current guidelines categorize ER-low BC as a separate entity and suggest equipoise regarding AET benefit. We previously determined that AET omission in chemotherapy-treated pts with ER+ BC resulted in a nearly 2-fold increase in death (2). However, the impact of AET omission in patients with ER-low BC is unknown. Methods: Beginning in 2018, the National Cancer Database (NCDB) began to abstract ER as a continuous variable, allowing classification of ER+ tumors as 1-10% or >10%. Therefore, we queried the NCDB 2018-2020 for patients with stage I-III ER+BC treated with neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy, as these pts have the highest risk of recurrence. ER was assessed as ER-neg (0%), low (1-10%) and ER >10%. OS was analyzed with AET as a time-dependent covariate using Cox proportional hazards regression. Results: 357,085 pts with stage I-III ER+BC were identified, with 10,396 (3%) classified as ER-low. Among pts with ER-low disease, 69% had PR-neg BC and 67% had HER2-neg BC. The majority (77%) were treated with chemotherapy (32% neoadjuvant, 44% adjuvant, 1% unknown timing) and formed our analysis cohort. Among these 7,956 pts, AET was omitted in 3,233 (41%). AET omission was more common for pts with tumors that were PR-neg vs positive (46% vs 30%, p<0.001), HER2-neg vs positive (44% vs 37%, p<0.001), and Ki67≥20% (44% vs 35%, p<0.001). With median follow-up of 3 years, 648 deaths were observed. OS was 94.3% (95% CI: 93.8-94.9%) at 2 years and 87.6% (95% CI: 86.5-88.7%) at 4 years. In unadjusted analysis, omission of AET was associated with worse OS (HR 1.40, 95% CI: 1.19-1.65, p<0.001), with similar effects regardless of PR, HER2, or Ki67 (each interaction test p>0.3). When controlling for age, comorbidity score, year of diagnosis, PR, HER2, and pathologic stage, the adjusted effect of AET omission on OS was HR 1.22 (95% CI: 1.00-1.48, p=0.05). Given assessment of OS was performed during pandemic years, with 1/3 of deaths occurring during the first year of follow-up, we performed a sensitivity analysis to analyze pts who survived to one year after definitive surgery. In this analysis, the adjusted effect of AET omission on OS was 1.24 (95% CI: 1.02-1.51, p=0.03). Conclusions: Omission of AET in pts treated with chemotherapy for ER-low, early-stage BC is associated with significantly worse OS. These data strongly suggest that pts with ER low BC should be counseled regarding the benefit of AET and practice guidelines should recommend AET in this setting. 1. Benefield JNCI 2020. 2. Choong SABCS 2022.

Abstract Purpose: We previously reported that postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor-α–positive breast cancer receiving adjuvant anastrozole 1 mg/day (ANA1) with estrone (E1) ≥1.3 pg/mL and estradiol (E2) ≥0.5 pg/mL [inadequate estrogen suppression (IES)] had a threefold increased risk of a breast cancer event. The objective of this study was to determine if increasing anastrozole to 10 mg/day (ANA10) could result in adequate estrogen suppression (AES: E1 &lt;1.3 pg/mL and/or E2 &lt;0.5 pg/mL) among those with IES on ANA1. Patients and Methods: Postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor-α–positive breast cancer planning to receive adjuvant ANA1 were eligible. E1 and E2 were assessed pre- and post-8 to 10 weeks of ANA1. Those with IES were switched to 8- to 10-week cycles of ANA10 followed by letrozole 2.5 mg/day. E1 and E2 were assessed after each cycle. Anastrozole concentrations were measured post-ANA1 and post-ANA10. Primary analyses included patients who documented taking at least 80% of the planned treatment (adherent cohort). Results: In total, 132 (84.6%) of 156 eligible patients were ANA1 adherent. IES occurred in 40 (30.3%) adherent patients. Twenty-five (78.1%) of 32 patients who began ANA10 were adherent, and AES was achieved in 19 (76.0%; 90% confidence interval, 58.1%–89.0%) patients. Anastrozole concentrations post-ANA1 and post-ANA10 did not differ by estrogen suppression status among adherent patients. AES was maintained/attained in 21 (91.3%) of 23 letrozole-adherent patients. Conclusions: Approximately 30% of ANA1-adherent patients had IES. Among those who switched to ANA10 and were adherent, 76% had AES. Further studies are required to validate emerging data that ANA1 results in IES for some patients and to determine the clinical benefit of switching to ANA10 or an alternative aromatase inhibitor.

Abstract Background: Multiple studies have confirmed the central role of preexisting immune response measured by stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (sTILs) in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Emerging studies showed that not only the number of TILs but also the location of TILs is important. There are 3 distinct immune architectures described based on the amount and locations of TILs, namely immune enriched (IN), immune excluded (IE), and immune desert (ID). Here we evaluated outcomes and characteristics associated with each immune landscape. Methods: NanoString Digital Spatial Profiling (DSP) and CosMx, a spatial multi-omics single-cell imaging platform, were performed in 75 samples from the Mayo Clinic (MC) TNBC cohort (Leon-Ferre BCRT 2018). NanoString IO360 was performed in 114 samples from the FinXX trial ( NCT00114816) . Firstly, tumors with sTIL quantified by H&E ≤ 30% were classified as ID. The rest of the tumors with high sTIL &gt; 30% were categorized according to the intratumoral CD8 protein expression by DSP, with IE having intratumoral CD8 in the lower median and IN having intratumoral CD8 in the upper median. Chi-square test, gene set enrichment, Cox regression, and Kaplan-Meier analysis were used. Differential expression listed as log 2-fold change (FC) was estimated from the linear mixed model with significance defined as two-sided p&lt; 0.05. Results: ID is associated with low Ki67 &lt; 5% (23.3% vs. 9.6% ID, p 0.02) as well as apocrine (11/13, 84.6%) and metaplastic histology (10/12, 83%). In both univariate and multivariate analysis, patients with IN had significantly improved recurrence-free survival (RFS) compared to those with ID (HR 0.37, 95%CI 0.18-0.74, p 0.005). Despite having high sTILs, IE had poor outcomes similar to ID (HR 0.84, 95%CI 0.36-1.98). Strikingly, we identified that IE patients had significantly lower plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDCs) compared to IN (mean 0 vs. 0.26/100 tumor cells, 95%CI 0.08-0.43 , p 0.01). Using Gene Set Enrichment Analysis to evaluate differential hallmarks between IN and IE, we identified IF Nɑ and IFNγ (FDR &lt; 0.001) responses as significantly enriched in IN group, consistent wi th the function of pDCs, which are a subset of dendritic cells specialized in secreting high levels of type I interferon. To validate this finding, we further evaluated the 11 leading edge gene IFNɑ signature in the FinXX trial. A high IFNɑ signature score was associated with significantly improved outcomes in the FinXX trial (HR 0.21, 95%CI 0.09-0.51 , p &lt; 0.001). Similar findings were observed using Kaplan-Meier analysis in the FinXX trial with significantly improved RFS (p 0.0006) and overall survival (p 0.0001) in patients with high IFNɑ signature scores. Furthermore, we evaluated the differential gene expression unique to IN tumors in the Mayo cohort. Expressions of MHC class I and class II in tumor cells, including HLA-A, HLA-B, HLA-C, HLA-DRA, HLA-DRB1, HLA-DPA1, and HLA-E, were associated with IN and significantly improved outcomes (p &lt; 0.05) compared to ID and IE. Conclusions: Highlighting the importance of spatial context, we identified that patients with IE tumors had poor outcomes despite having high TILs. Moreover, u sing an in-depth analysis with spatially defined context, we identified the central role of pDC and the significance of IF Nɑ in TNBC. Support: Breast Cancer Research Foundation, Mayo Clinic Breast Cancer SPORE (P50CA116201-17) W81XWH-15-1-0292, P50CA015083, R35CA253187 Citation Format: Saranya Chumsri, Yi Liu, Yaohua Ma, Jodi Carter, Mark Gregory, Sarah Church, Jason Reeves, Heather Ann Brauer, Sarah Warren, Heikki Joensuu, Edith Perez, Roberto Leon-Ferre, David Hillman, Judy Boughey, James Ingle, Krishna Kalari, Fergus Couch, Matthew Goetz, Keith Knutson, E. Thompson. The spatially resolved single-cell atlas of the tumor immune architecture revealed the central role of IFN-alpha and plasmacytoid dendritic cells in triple-negative breast cancer in the Mayo Clinic cohort and FinXX trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PS03-03.

Abstract Background: Adjuvant breast cancer therapy is informed by whether a tumour is positive or negative for the biomarkers ER, PgR, and HER2, often without regard to level of positivity. Quantitation has been proposed to improve therapeutic management. Adjunctive statistical standardization has been proposed to improve inter-laboratory comparability of biomarkers results. Methods: This primary report utilized adjunctive statistical standardization of machine-quantitated image analysis biomarker assessments. CCTG MA.27 (NCT00066573) is an adjuvant phase III trial of exemestane versus anastrozole in postmenopausal women with ER+ and/or PgR+ tumours. IHC ER, PgR, and HER2 were centrally assessed, with FISH (HER2;HER2/CEP17) determinations for equivocal IHC HER2. HSCOREs were statistically standardized to a mean of 0, standard deviation of 1 following Box-Cox variance stabilization transformations of square for ER and natural logarithm for PgR (0.1 was added to 0 HSCOREs). The primary endpoint was STEEP distant disease-free survival (DDFS) at the longest trial follow-up of median 4.1 years. Survival was described with Kaplan-Meier plots. The univariate Wilcoxon (Peto-Prentice) test statistic was used with usual designation of negative/positive (0; &gt;0), and standardized cut-points at standard deviations about mean of 0(&lt;-1; (-1,0]; (0,1]; &gt;1). Cox multivariate regressions adjusted for age, T and N stage, grade, lymphovascular invasion, treatment, and baseline patient demographics, utilized likelihood ratio tests. Nominal significance was p=0.05. Results: Of the 7576 women accrued, 3048 had machine-quantitated image analysis results: 2900 (95%) for ER; 2726 (89%) for PgR. Only 8 women were ASCO/CAP ER- (HSCORE 0); PgR HSCORE was 0 for 533. Statistically standardized units differentiated DDFS ER levels (p&lt; 0.001) and PgR levels (p&lt; 0.001). In adjusted multivariate analyses, higher ER HSCORE was associated with better DDFS (p=0.05) with weak evidence of an association (p=0.11) for standardized HSCORE, and no significant association (respectively, p=0.28, p=0.54) in models with PgR. Higher PgR was associated with better DDFS (p=0.001) in all multivariate assessments, including those with ER. Conclusions: DDFS was superior for patients with higher ER and PgR standardized units compared with those with HSCOREs &lt;-1. Adjunctive statistical standardization, similar to that mandated for clinical practice by the World Health Organization for BMD, should improve inter-laboratory comparability of biomarker results for similar patient populations. Biomarker N DDFS DDFS 5-year (%) 95% CI ER total 2900 ER &lt;-1 506 86 (82, 91) ER (-1, 0] 934 94 (92, 96) ER ( 0, 1] 919 94 (92, 96) ER &gt;1 541 96 (93, 98) PgR total 2726 PgR &lt;-1 734 89 (86, 92) PgR (-1, 0] 439 92 (89, 95) PgR ( 0, 1] 967 95 (93, 96) PgR &gt;1.0 586 98 (97,100) Citation Format: Judy-Anne Chapman, Jane Bayani, Sandip SenGupta, John MS Bartlett, Tammy Piper, Mary Anne Quintayo, Shakeel Virk, Paul Goss, James Ingle, Matthew Ellis, George Sledge Jr, George Budd, Manuela Rabaglio, Rafat Ansari, Richard Tozer, David D'Souza, Haji Chalchal, Silvana Spadafora, Vered Stearns, Edith A. Perez, Karen Gelmon, Timothy Whelan, Catherine Elliott, Lois Shepherd, Bingshu Chen, Karen Taylor. Adjunctive statistical standardization of quantitated machine image analysis of Estrogen and Progesterone Receptors: CCTG MA.27 trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO1-27-10.

Abstract Background: Ovarian function suppression (OFS) combined with tamoxifen (TAM) or an aromatase inhibitor (AI) is standard for premenopausal (PM) ER+, HER2- breast cancer (BC). However, &gt; 40% PM patients (pts) are intolerant of OFS. For these pts, TAM is the only FDA approved option. In the neoadjuvant endocrine setting, pts with endocrine sensitive disease (ESD) (Ki-67 ≤ 10% at 4 weeks) have 5yr dDFS &gt; 97%; however, only 45% of TAM pts vs &gt;75% with AI+OFS achieve 4 wk ESD (Nitz JCO 2022). (Z)-endoxifen (ENDX) is a potent anti-estrogen superior to TAM and AI in xenograft models and with antitumor activity in endocrine-resistant postmenopausal pts. ENDX additionally targets protein kinase C beta 1 (PKCβ1) at concentrations &gt;500 ng/mL, resulting in AKT inhibition and apoptosis (Jayaraman npj Breast Cancer 2023). We hypothesize that ENDX dual targeting of ERα and PKCβ1 will obviate the need for OFS and be non-inferior to AI plus OFS for PM pts with ER+/HER2- BC. Methods: EVANGELINE (NCT05607004) is an ongoing phase 2 multicenter neoadjuvant study with pharmacokinetic (PK) run-in assessing ENDX in PM women with ER+/HER2- BC. The primary objective for the PK run-in is to identify a dose (40 or 80 mg/day) resulting in ENDX steady state concentrations (Css) of 500-1000 ng/mL (to target both ERα and PKCβ1) without significant toxicity. Following PK run-in, the randomized phase II goal is to assess whether the ESD rate with ENDX is non-inferior to exemestane plus goserelin. Women with ESD at wk4 continue treatment for 24 weeks followed by surgery. Here we report the results from the 40 mg/day PK run-in. Results: Seven PM women (6 White, 1 Asian) aged 28-51 (median 46) received ENDX 40 mg/day. Pt characteristics on study were: ER &gt; 90% (all pts), median Ki-67 = 13 (range 4-33%), cTstage (cT2: 6 pts, cT3: 1 pt), and tumor grade (G1: 1 pt, G2: 6 pts). The median ENDX 28 day Css (ng/mL) was 263.6 (range 180.3-376.6). One pt discontinued due to wk4 Ki-67 remaining &gt; 10%. The remaining 6 had ESD, with either wk4 Ki-67 remaining ≤ 10% (3 pts) or decreasing to ≤ 10% (3 pts) and after 24 wks underwent surgery with surgical Ki-67 ≤ 3% (range 0-3%). MRI central review (wk12 and wk24) demonstrated target lesion decreases in all pts with 1 CR, 1 PR and 4 SD (RECIST). Treatment related toxicities included grade 3 headache (n=1), grade 2 amenorrhea (n=1), and grade 2 hot flashes (n=1). The median (range) baseline estrone (n=5) was 54 pg/mL (19-114) with median (range) fold increase from baseline of 9.0 (1.3-23.2) at wk4 and 4.7 (0.4 - 25.9) at wk24. The median baseline estradiol level (n=5) was 29 pg/mL (19-209) with median fold increases from baseline of 17.9 (0.4-57.0) at wk4 and 8.1 (0.04 - 56.6) at wk24. Additional surgical and blood biomarker data will be presented at the meeting. Conclusions: ENDX (40 mg/day) exhibits promising antitumor activity for PM ER+/HER2- BC but with ENDX Css below target. Enrollment is ongoing to the 80 mg/day dose level. Citation Format: Matthew P. Goetz, Vera J. Suman, Heather Fraser, Lida Mina, Pooja Advani, Roberto Leon-Ferre, Karthik Giridhar, Felipe Batalini, Katie N. Hunt, Swaathi Jayaraman, James Jakub, Patricia Cronin, Mara Piltin, Amy Degnim, James N. Ingle, Judy C. Boughey, Sarah Buhrow, Joel Reid, Matthew Schellenberg, John Hawse, Steven Quay. Neoadjuvant (Z)-endoxifen in premenopausal ER+, HER2- breast cancer: Evaluation of the first pharmacokinetic cohort of the EVANGELINE trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 2 (Late-Breaking, Clinical Trial, and Invited Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(7_Suppl):Abstract nr CT205.

Abstract Background: Previous studies demonstrated that obesity is associated with poor outcomes and significantly worse pathological complete response (pCR) in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) treated with conventional chemotherapy. Emerging studies described a phenomenon termed the obesity paradox, which referred to improved outcomes observed in obese patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Our study aimed to determine distinct immune features in TNBC across body mass index (BMI). Methods: Characteristics and outcomes of TNBC patients treated with neoadjuvant pembrolizumab-based chemotherapy at Mayo Clinic were collected. Normal BMI was defined as 18-25 kg/m2, overweight 25-30, and obese BMI ≥ 30. NanoString CosMx, a spatial multi-omics single-cell imaging (SMI), was performed in 75 samples from the Mayo Clinic TNBC cohort (Leon-Ferre BCRT 2018). Differential expression as log 2-fold change (FC) was estimated from the linear mixed model with significance defined as two-sided p&lt; 0.05. Results: Between 2021-2023, there were 108 TNBC patients treated with neoadjuvant pembrolizumab. 25.9% were obese, 32.4% were overweight, and 41.7% had normal BMI. In contrast to previous studies with conventional chemotherapy, obese patients numerically had a higher pCR rate of 71.4% with pembrolizumab-based chemotherapy compared to 55.6% in normal and 62.9% in overweight patients. However, this difference did not reach statistical significance (obese vs. normal weight, OR 2.26, 95%CI 0.89-6.06, p 0.094). We further evaluated spatially-resolved immune features associated with obesity using CosMx SMI in 75 samples from the MC TNBC cohort. Obese patients had significantly higher intratumoral B cells (log2FC 1.88, p 0.017), stromal B cells (log2FC 2.79, p 0.001), stromal plasmablasts (log2FC 1.94, p 0.047), and stromal macrophages (log2FC 1.80, p 0.017) compared to patients with normal BMI. Obese patients also had significantly lower intratumoral myeloid dendritic cells (mDC) (log2FC -1.27, p 0.037). Similar trends were observed after standardizing cell counts per 100 tumor or stromal cells, including higher intratumoral B cells (log2FC 3.00, p 0.001), intratumoral plasmablasts (log2FC 2.00, p 0.006), intratumoral natural killer (NK) cells (log2FC 1.66, p 0.044), and stromal B cells (log2FC 1.50, p 0.008). Differential gene analyses for intratumoral B cells revealed that genes (CD74, HLA-C, HLA-DRB1, HLA-DRA, HLA-DRB) associated with the positive regulation of type 2 immune or chemokine response were upregulated. Conclusions: Using in-depth analysis with spatially defined context, our study showed that obese TNBC patients had significantly higher B cell infiltration, which is associated with improved outcomes with ICIs. Future research on how obesity alters the immune microenvironment is needed to identify potential pathways to improve outcomes with ICIs in TNBC. Citation Format: Songhan Pang, Yi Liu, Yaohua Ma, Zhuo Li, Roberto A. Leon-Ferre, David Zahrieh, David W. Hillman, Judy C. Boughey, James N. Ingle, Krishna R. Kalari, Fergus J. Couch, Matthew P. Goetz, Keith L. Knutson, Saranya Chumsri, E. Aubrey Thompson. Tumor-immune microenvironment associated with obesity in triple-negative breast cancer in the Mayo Clinic cohort [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 1162.

Abstract Background: Dysregulated Notch signalling contributes to breast cancer development and progression, but validated tools to measure the level of Notch signalling in breast cancer subtypes and in response to systemic therapy are largely lacking. A transcriptomic signature of Notch signalling would thus be warranted, and in this report, we have established such a classifier. Methods: To generate the signature, we first identified Notch-regulated genes from six basal-like breast cancer cell lines subjected to elevated and reduced Notch signalling by culturing on immobilized Notch ligand Jagged1 or blockade of Notch by g-secretase inhibitors, respectively. From this cadre of Notch-regulated genes, we developed candidate transcriptomic signatures that were trained on a breast cancer patient dataset (the TCGA-BRCA cohort) and a broader breast cancer cell line cohort and sought to validate in independent data sets. Results: An optimal 20-gene transcriptomic signature was selected. We validated the signature on two independent patient datasets (METABRIC and Oslo2) and it showed an improved coherence score and tumour specificity compared with previously published signatures. Furthermore, the signature score was particularly high for basal-like breast cancer, indicating an enhanced level of Notch signalling in this subtype. The signature score was increased after neoadjuvant treatment in the PROMIX and BEAUTY patient cohorts, and a lower signature score generally correlated with better clinical outcome. Conclusions: The 20-gene transcriptional signature has the potential to better stratify patients and to evaluate the response of future Notch-based therapies for breast cancer. Citation Format: Eike-Benjamin Braune, Felix Geist, Xiaojia Tang, Krishna Kalari, Judy Boughey, Liewei Wang, Roberto A. Leon-Ferre, Antonino B. D’Assoro, James N. Ingle, Matthew P. Goetz, Kang Wang, Theodoros Foukakis, Anita Seshire, Dirk Wienke, Urban Lendahl. Identification of a Notch transcriptomic signature for breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR-NCI-EORTC Virtual International Conference on Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics; 2023 Oct 11-15; Boston, MA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Ther 2023;22(12 Suppl):Abstract nr B013.

581 Background: Several studies have established the crucial role of preexisting immune response measured by tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Emerging studies showed that not only the number of TILs but also the location of TILs is as critical. There are 3 distinct immune landscapes described based on the locations of TILs, namely immune enriched (IN), immune excluded (IE), and immune desert (ID), which are associated with outcomes in TNBC treated with immune-checkpoint inhibitors. Here we evaluated characteristics associated with each immune landscape. Methods: NanoString IO360, Digital Spatial Profiling (DSP), and CosMx, a spatial multi-omics single-cell imaging platform, were used. DSP was used to quantify 39 immune-related proteins in stromal and tumor-enriched segments from 44 TNBC samples from the FinXX trial (NCT00114816) and 276 samples from the Mayo Clinic (MC) TNBC cohort (Leon-Ferre BCRT 2018). CosMx was performed in 75 samples from the MC TNBC cohort. First, tumors with TIL quantified by H&E ≤ 30% were classified as ID. The rest of the tumors were categorized according to the intratumoral CD8 protein expression by DSP, with IE having intratumoral CD8 in the lower median and IN having intratumoral CD8 in the upper median. Differential expression listed as log fold change (FC) was estimated from the linear mixed model with significance defined as two-sided p < 0.05. Results: Using DSP in the FinXX trial, intratumoral and stromal higher HLA-DR (FC 1.68, p = 0.001), B2M (FC 0.8, p = 0.005), CD4 (FC 0.74, p = 0.01), and CD40 (FC 1.56, p = 0.001) were associated with IN compared to ID. When comparing IE and IN, higher intratumoral CD11c (FC 0.97, p = 0.01) and stromal CD4 (FC 0.89, p = 0.047), CD20 (FC 0.85, p = 0.016), CD40 (FC 0.95, p = 0.045), and CD27 (FC 0.84, p = 0.024) were associated with IN. Similar findings were observed in the MC cohort. Moreover, intratumoral NY-ESO-1 expression (FC 0.55, p = 0.03) was associated with IN. Using GSEA with IO360 in the FinXX trial, PI3K-Akt signaling was associated with ID compared to IN (p = 0.01). We further evaluated the differential gene expression in a spatially resolved manner using CosMx with single-cell sequencing in the MC cohort. Expressions of MHC class I and class II in tumor cells, including HLA-A, HLA-B, HLA-C, HLA-DRA, HLA-DRB1, HLA-DPA1, and HLA-E, were associated with IN compared to ID and IE. Conclusions: Using an in-depth analysis with spatially defined context, we identified characteristics associated with distinct immune landscapes in TNBC. Our study highlights the potential future implications of intratumoral MHC expression, CD40, and PI3K-AKT as biomarkers and therapeutic targets. Clinical trial information: NCT00114816 .