Citations

AbstractObjectiveIn X‐raycomputed tomography (CT), many important clinical applications may benefit from a fast acquisition speed. The helical scan is the most widely used acquisition mode in clinical CT, where a fast helical pitch can improve the acquisition speed. However, on a typical single‐source helical CT (SSCT) system, the helical pitch p typically cannot exceed 1.5; otherwise, reconstruction artifacts will result from data insufficiency. The purpose of this work is to develop a deep convolutional neural network (CNN) to correct for artifacts caused by an ultra‐fast pitch, which can enable faster acquisition speed than what is currently achievable.MethodsA customized CNN (denoted as ultra‐fast‐pitch network (UFP‐net)) was developed to restore the underlying anatomical structure from the artifact‐corrupted post‐reconstruction data acquired from SSCT with ultra‐fast pitch (i.e., p ≥ 2). UFP‐net employed residual learning to capture the features of image artifacts. UFP‐net further deployed in‐house‐customized functional blocks with spatial‐domain local operators and frequency‐domain non‐local operators, to explore multi‐scale feature representation. Images of contrast‐enhanced patient exams (n = 83) with routine pitch setting (i.e., p < 1) were retrospectively collected, which were used as training and testing datasets. This patient cohort involved CT exams over different scan ranges of anatomy (chest, abdomen, and pelvis) and CT systems (Siemens Definition, Definition Flash, Definition AS+, Siemens Healthcare, Inc.), and the corresponding base CT scanning protocols used consistent settings of major scan parameters (e.g., collimation and pitch). Forward projection of the original images was calculated to synthesize helical CT scans with one regular pitch setting (p = 1) and two ultra‐fast‐pitch setting (p = 2 and 3). All patient images were reconstructed using the standard filtered‐back‐projection (FBP) algorithm. A customized multi‐stage training scheme was developed to incrementally optimize the parameters of UFP‐net, using ultra‐fast‐pitch images as network inputs and regular pitch images as labels. Visual inspection was conducted to evaluate image quality. Structural similarity index (SSIM) and relative root‐mean‐square error (rRMSE) were used as quantitative quality metrics.ResultsThe UFP‐net dramatically improved image quality over standard FBP at both ultra‐fast‐pitch settings. At p = 2, UFP‐net yielded higher mean SSIM (> 0.98) with lower mean rRMSE (< 2.9%), compared to FBP (mean SSIM < 0.93; mean rRMSE > 9.1%). Quantitative metrics at p = 3: UFP‐net—mean SSIM [0.86, 0.94] and mean rRMSE [5.0%, 8.2%]; FBP—mean SSIM [0.36, 0.61] and mean rRMSE [36.0%, 58.6%].ConclusionThe proposed UFP‐net has the potential to enable ultra‐fast data acquisition in clinical CT without sacrificing image quality. This method has demonstrated reasonable generalizability over different body parts when the corresponding CT exams involved consistent base scan parameters.

PurposeTo develop a convolutional neural network (CNN) that can directly estimate material density distribution from multi‐energy computed tomography (CT) images without performing conventional material decomposition.MethodsThe proposed CNN (denoted as Incept‐net) followed the general framework of encoder–decoder network, with an assumption that local image information was sufficient for modeling the nonlinear physical process of multi‐energy CT. Incept‐net was implemented with a customized loss function, including an in‐house‐designed image‐gradient‐correlation (IGC) regularizer to improve edge preservation. The network consisted of two types of customized multibranch modules exploiting multiscale feature representation to improve the robustness over local image noise and artifacts. Inserts with various densities of different materials [hydroxyapatite (HA), iodine, a blood–iodine mixture, and fat] were scanned using a research photon‐counting detector (PCD) CT with two energy thresholds and multiple radiation dose levels. The network was trained using phantom image patches only, and tested with different‐configurations of full field‐of‐view phantom and in vivo porcine images. Furthermore, the nominal mass densities of insert materials were used as the labels in CNN training, which potentially provided an implicit mass conservation constraint. The Incept‐net performance was evaluated in terms of image noise, detail preservation, and quantitative accuracy. Its performance was also compared to common material decomposition algorithms including least‐square‐based material decomposition (LS‐MD), total‐variation regularized material decomposition (TV‐MD), and U‐net‐based method.ResultsIncept‐net improved accuracy of the predicted mass density of basis materials compared with the U‐net, TV‐MD, and LS‐MD: the mean absolute error (MAE) of iodine was 0.66, 1.0, 1.33, and 1.57 mgI/cc for Incept‐net, U‐net, TV‐MD, and LS‐MD, respectively, across all iodine‐present inserts (2.0–24.0 mgI/cc). With the LS‐MD as the baseline, Incept‐net and U‐net achieved comparable noise reduction (both around 95%), both higher than TV‐MD (85%). The proposed IGC regularizer effectively helped both Incept‐net and U‐net to reduce image artifact. Incept‐net closely conserved the total mass densities (i.e., mass conservation constraint) in porcine images, which heuristically validated the quantitative accuracy of its outputs in anatomical background. In general, Incept‐net performance was less dependent on radiation dose levels than the two conventional methods; with approximately 40% less parameters, the Incept‐net achieved relatively improved performance than the comparator U‐net, indicating that performance gain by Incept‐net was not achieved by simply increasing network learning capacity.ConclusionIncept‐net demonstrated superior qualitative image appearance, quantitative accuracy, and lower noise than the conventional methods and less sensitive to dose change. Incept‐net generalized and performed well with unseen image structures and different material mass densities. This study provided preliminary evidence that the proposed CNN may be used to improve the material decomposition quality in multi‐energy CT.

PurposeThis work aims to develop a new framework of image quality assessment using deep learning‐based model observer (DL‐MO) and to validate it in a low‐contrast lesion detection task that involves CT images with patient anatomical background.MethodsThe DL‐MO was developed using the transfer learning strategy to incorporate a pretrained deep convolutional neural network (CNN), a partial least square regression discriminant analysis (PLS‐DA) model and an internal noise component. The CNN was previously trained to achieve the state‐of‐the‐art classification accuracy over a natural image database. The earlier layers of the CNN were used as a deep feature extractor, with the assumption that similarity exists between the CNN and the human visual system. The PLSR model was used to further engineer the deep feature for the lesion detection task in CT images. The internal noise component was incorporated to model the inefficiency and variability of human observer (HO) performance, and to generate the ultimate DL‐MO test statistics. Seven abdominal CT exams were retrospectively collected from the same type of CT scanners. To compare DL‐MO with HO, 12 experimental conditions with varying lesion size, lesion contrast, radiation dose, and reconstruction types were generated, each condition with 154 trials. CT images of a real liver metastatic lesion were numerically modified to generate lesion models with four lesion sizes (5, 7, 9, and 11 mm) and three contrast levels (15, 20, and 25 HU). The lesions were inserted into patient liver images using a projection‐based method. A validated noise insertion tool was used to synthesize CT exams with 50% and 25% of routine radiation dose level. CT images were reconstructed using the weighted filtered back projection algorithm and an iterative reconstruction algorithm. Four medical physicists performed a two‐alternative forced choice (2AFC) detection task (with multislice scrolling viewing mode) on patient images across the 12 experimental conditions. DL‐MO was operated on the same datasets. Statistical analyses were performed to evaluate the correlation and agreement between DL‐MO and HO.ResultsA statistically significant positive correlation was observed between DL‐MO and HO for the 2AFC low‐contrast detection task that involves patient liver background. The corresponding Pearson product moment correlation coefficient was 0.986 [95% confidence interval (0.950, 0.996)]. Bland–Altman agreement analysis did not indicate statistically significant differences.ConclusionsThe proposed DL‐MO is highly correlated with HO in a low‐contrast detection task that involves realistic patient liver background. This study demonstrated the potential of the proposed DL‐MO to assess image quality directly based on patient images in realistic, clinically relevant CT tasks.

Objective The aims of this study were to quantitatively assess two new scan modes on a photon-counting detector computed tomography system, each designed to maximize spatial resolution, and to qualitatively demonstrate potential clinical impact using patient data. Materials and Methods This Health Insurance Portability Act–compliant study was approved by our institutional review board. Two high–spatial-resolution scan modes (Sharp and UHR) were evaluated using phantoms to quantify spatial resolution and image noise, and results were compared with the standard mode (Macro). Patients were scanned using a conventional energy-integrating detector scanner and the photon-counting detector scanner using the same radiation dose. In first patient images, anatomic details were qualitatively evaluated to demonstrate potential clinical impact. Results Sharp and UHR modes had a 69% and 87% improvement in in-plane spatial resolution, respectively, compared with Macro mode (10% modulation-translation-function values of 16.05, 17.69, and 9.48 lp/cm, respectively). The cutoff spatial frequency of the UHR mode (32.4 lp/cm) corresponded to a limiting spatial resolution of 150 μm. The full-width-at-half-maximum values of the section sensitivity profiles were 0.41, 0.44, and 0.67 mm for the thinnest image thickness for each mode (0.25, 0.25, and 0.5 mm, respectively). At the same in-plane spatial resolution, Sharp and UHR images had up to 15% lower noise than Macro images. Patient images acquired in Sharp mode demonstrated better delineation of fine anatomic structures compared with Macro mode images. Conclusions Phantom studies demonstrated superior resolution and noise properties for the Sharp and UHR modes relative to the standard Macro mode and patient images demonstrated the potential benefit of these scan modes for clinical practice.

PurposeThe task‐based assessment of image quality using model observers is increasingly used for the assessment of different imaging modalities. However, the performance computation of model observers needs standardization as well as a well‐established trust in its implementation methodology and uncertainty estimation. The purpose of this work was to determine the degree of equivalence of the channelized Hotelling observer performance and uncertainty estimation using an intercomparison exercise.Materials and MethodsImage samples to estimate model observer performance for detection tasks were generated from two‐dimensional CT image slices of a uniform water phantom. A common set of images was sent to participating laboratories to perform and document the following tasks: (a) estimate the detectability index of a well‐defined CHO and its uncertainty in three conditions involving different sized targets all at the same dose, and (b) apply this CHO to an image set where ground truth was unknown to participants (lower image dose). In addition, and on an optional basis, we asked the participating laboratories to (c) estimate the performance of real human observers from a psychophysical experiment of their choice. Each of the 13 participating laboratories was confidentially assigned a participant number and image sets could be downloaded through a secure server. Results were distributed with each participant recognizable by its number and then each laboratory was able to modify their results with justification as model observer calculation are not yet a routine and potentially error prone.ResultsDetectability index increased with signal size for all participants and was very consistent for 6 mm sized target while showing higher variability for 8 and 10 mm sized target. There was one order of magnitude between the lowest and the largest uncertainty estimation.ConclusionsThis intercomparison helped define the state of the art of model observer performance computation and with thirteen participants, reflects openness and trust within the medical imaging community. The performance of a CHO with explicitly defined channels and a relatively large number of test images was consistently estimated by all participants. In contrast, the paper demonstrates that there is no agreement on estimating the variance of detectability in the training and testing setting.