Citations

Abstract In an effort to enhance the trustworthiness of its clinical practice guidelines, the Endocrine Society has recently adopted new policies and more rigorous methodologies for its guideline program. In this Clinical Practice Guideline Communication, we describe these recent enhancements—many of which reflect greater adherence to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach to guideline development—in addition to the rationale for such changes. Improvements to the Society’s guideline development practices include, but are not limited to, enhanced inclusion of nonendocrinologist experts, including patient representatives, on guideline development panels; implementation of a more rigorous conflict/duality of interest policy; a requirement that all formal recommendations must be demonstrably underpinned by systematic evidence review; the explicit use of GRADE Evidence-to-Decision frameworks; greater use and explanation of standardized guideline language; and a more intentional approach to guideline updating. Lastly, we describe some of the experiential differences our guideline readers are most likely to notice.

ABSTRACT The development of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines has proceeded at an unprecedented pace, with numerous trials conducted simultaneously across the world as a result of massive technological and financial resource expenditures. With multiple vaccines having now received regulatory approval, public health efforts to promote widespread vaccine dissemination are currently underway. There has been particular emphasis placed on vaccination of older populations, the age group in which COVID-19 infection has been most lethal. However, such widespread vaccination approaches have necessarily raised important questions related to potential interactions with underlying diseases and concomitant treatments among persons to be vaccinated. Osteoporosis is a chronic condition marked by reduced bone strength and an associated increased risk for fracture that generally requires sustained medical intervention(s). Osteoporosis is neither associated with a higher risk of COVID-19 infection nor by more pronounced disease severity following infection, such that individuals with osteoporosis need not be more highly prioritized for COVID-19 vaccination. Osteoporosis therapies do not interfere with the efficacy or side effect profiles of COVID-19 vaccines and should not be stopped or indefinitely delayed because of vaccination. Depending on the specific drug profile within an anti-osteoporosis medication category, minor adjustments to the timing of drug administration may be considered with respect to the patient's COVID-19 vaccination schedule. Herein we provide practical recommendations for the care of patients requiring treatment for osteoporosis in the setting of COVID-19 vaccination. © 2021 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR).

AbstractBackgroundTertiary hyperparathyroidism following kidney transplantation is most commonly characterized by 4‐gland hyperplasia, but single and double adenomatous disease has been demonstrated in this population as well. It is unknown whether preoperative imaging can assist in identifying patients who may qualify for focused surgery for adenomatous disease.Materials and methodsWe performed a retrospective review of our patient database from 1998–2018 for patients with tertiary hyperparathyroidism following renal transplant. Patient charts were reviewed for patient demographics, laboratory values, preoperative imaging, operative findings, pathology, and complications.ResultsWe identified 113 patients with tertiary hyperparathyroidism following renal transplant who underwent parathyroidectomy. There were 51 females and 62 males with a mean age of 53.4 ± 13.4 years. Median preoperative calcium and PTH were 10.9 mg/dl (IQR 10.3–11.2) and 228 pg/ml (IQR 118–305). Preoperative ultrasound was performed in 60 patients. Of these, 11 (18%) were negative, 38 (63%) showed 1–2 adenomas, and 11 (18%) showed ≥ 3 adenomas. 99mTc‐sestamibi parathyroid scintigraphy was performed in 101/113 patients. Of these, 11 (11%) were negative, 62 (61%) showed 1–2 areas of discordant sestamibi uptake, and 28 (28%) showed ≥ 3 areas of discordant uptake. Ultimately, 19 (17%) patients had a single adenoma removed, 16 (14%) had 2 adenomas removed, and (69%) had multi‐gland disease. There were 26 ectopic glands found in 21 patients, 42.3% of which were identified on preoperative imaging. 94.1% of patients were eucalcemic at last follow‐up, mean (± SD) 5.8 ± 3.6 years. Adenomas that were visualized on ultrasound were larger on pathology than those non‐visualized (997 ± 120 mg (mean ± SE) vs. 388 ± 109 mg, p = 0.0003). This was also true for parathyroid scintigraphy (647 ± 41 mg vs. 355 ± 51 mg, p = 0.0001).ConclusionIn patients with tertiary hyperparathyroidism, preoperative imaging can aid in predicting which patients will have 1–2 gland disease. In patients with 1–2 gland disease on congruent ultrasound and nuclear medicine imaging studies, the accuracy increases to 59%. Preoperative imaging can help identify ectopic glands. Larger adenomas are more likely to be identified on both imaging modalities.

Abstract Context The diagnosis of osteoporosis and assessment of fracture risk prior to a sentinel fracture was transformed by the widespread clinical use of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) for the assessment of bone mineral density (BMD). Evidence Acquisition This review is based on a collection of primary and review literature gathered from a PubMed search of “dual energy X-ray absorptiometry,” “trabecular bone score,” and “atypical femur fracture” among other keywords. PubMed searches were supplemented by the authors’ prior knowledge of the subject. Evidence Synthesis While uncertainty exists for some aspects of osteoporosis care, patient and clinician familiarity with BMD assessment for screening and monitoring is firmly established. Beyond BMD, lateral spine images obtained with DXA can diagnose osteoporosis and refine fracture risk through the detection of unrecognized vertebral fractures. In addition, analysis of DXA lumbar spine images can reflect changes in trabecular bone microarchitecture, a component of bone “quality” that predicts risk of fracture independent of BMD. Finally, monitoring of bone health by DXA may be extended to include assessment of the femoral cortices for rare but serious adverse effects associated with antiresorptive therapies. Conclusions Increasing technologic sophistication requires additional consideration for how DXA imaging is performed, interpreted and applied to patient care. As with any test, clinicians must be familiar with DXA performance, pitfalls in analysis, and interpretation within each clinical context in which DXA is applied. With this perspective, care providers will be well positioned to contribute to continuous improvement of DXA performance and, in turn, quality of osteoporosis care.

Abstract Context Reduced bone material strength index (BMSi) and increased cortical porosity (CtPo) have emerged as potentially contributing to fracture risk in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients. Objective To determine whether BMSi or CtPo are related to other diabetic complications. Design Cross-sectional observational study. Setting Subjects recruited from a random sample of southeast Minnesota residents. Participants A total of 171 T2DM patients (mean age, 68.8 years) and 108 age-matched nondiabetic controls (mean age, 67.3 years). Main Measures Bone material strength index was measured using microindentation, skin advanced glycation end-products (AGEs) measured using autofluorescence, high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography at the distal radius and tibia, assessment of diabetic microvascular complications including urine microalbuminuria, retinopathy, neuropathy, and vascular disease (ankle brachial index and transcutaneous oxygen tension [TcPO2]). All analyses were adjusted for age, sex, and body mass index. Results Skin AGEs were negatively correlated with the BMSi in both T2DM (r = -0.30, P < 0.001) and control (r = -0.23, P = 0.020) subjects. In relating diabetic complications to CtPo, we found that T2DM patients with clinically significant peripheral vascular disease (TcPO2 ≤ 40 mm Hg) had higher (+21.0%, P = 0.031) CtPo at the distal tibia as compared to controls; in these subjects, CtPo was negatively correlated with TcPO2 at both the distal tibia (r = -0.39, P = 0.041) and radius (r = -0.41, P = 0.029). Conclusions Our findings demonstrate that bone material properties are related to AGE accumulation regardless of diabetes status, while CtPo in T2DM patients is linked to TcPO2, a measure of microvascular blood flow.

ABSTRACT Osteoporosis is a chronic condition that reflects reduced bone strength and an associated increased risk for fracture. As a chronic condition, osteoporosis generally requires sustained medical intervention(s) to limit the risks for additional bone loss, compromise of skeletal integrity, and fracture occurrence. Further complicating this issue is the fact that the abrupt cessation of some therapies can be associated with an increased risk for harm. It is in this context that the COVID-19 pandemic has brought unprecedented disruption to the provision of health care globally, including near universal requirements for social distancing. In this Perspective, we provide evidence, where available, regarding the general care of patients with osteoporosis in the COVID-19 era and provide clinical recommendations based primarily on expert opinion when data are absent. Particular emphasis is placed on the transition from parenteral osteoporosis therapies. It is hoped that these recommendations can be used to safely guide care for patients with osteoporosis until a return to routine clinical care standards is available. © 2020 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

Abstract Patients with Type 2 Diabetes (T2D) are at higher fracture risk despite having relatively normal or even increased BMD by DXA. Increased cortical porosity has emerged as a potential factor contributing to fragility fractures in T2D. However, there is conflicting evidence whether T2D patients have increased cortical porosity. We hypothesized that microvascular complications have an important role in cortical porosity. Thus, we performed high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography imaging at the distal radius and tibia to evaluate bone microarchitecture in men with T2DM age ≥ 50 yrs or postmenopausal women with T2DM and nondiabetic controls. Comprehensive diabetic complications were assessed in all patients including urine microalbuminuria, retinopathy, neuropathy (touch, temperature, and vibration sensation), ankle brachial index (ABI) and transcutaneous oxygen tension (TcPO2). Percent differences between groups were obtained from linear regression models adjusting for age, BMI, and sex. Relationships between variables were assessed using adjusted Spearman correlations. A total of 164 T2D patients (mean age 68.9 ±7.8 yrs.; 56.7% men; HbA1C=7.7 ±0.9%; mean diabetes duration 15.2 yrs.) and 107 nondiabetic controls (mean age 67.3±8.8 yrs.; 42.1% men; HbA1C =5.4 ±0.3%) were recruited to the study. Overall, there was a trend for increased cortical porosity at the distal tibia in the T2D group (+12.2%; p=0.063) compared with nondiabetic controls. Of note, TcPO2 was negatively correlated with cortical porosity at the distal radius (r= -0.17; p= 0.039) and distal tibia (r= -0.15; p= 0.073). In particular, the Low TcPO2 (≤40 mmHg) group (n=29) had greater cortical porosity at the distal tibia (+19.6 %; p=0.037) compared with the High TcPO2 (>40 mmHg) group (n=133). In addition, the low TcPO2 group had a significant increase in cortical porosity in the distal tibia (+24.8% p=0.020) compared with nondiabetic controls. In conclusion, this is the first evidence in humans indicating that TcPO2, a measure of microvascular blood flow, is linked to cortical porosity in the distal radius and tibia in T2D patients. Our findings may explain the conflicting findings regarding cortical porosity in T2D because only T2D patients with impaired microvascular blood flow have increased cortical porosity. Collectively, our data indicate that cortical porosity is a microvascular complication of longstanding T2D.

Abstract Patients with Type 2 Diabetes (T2D) are at increased fracture risk despite having relatively normal or even increased BMD by DXA. The critical aspect of bone quality deterioration in T2D patients could explain this clinically important discrepancy. Material composition is a component of bone quality that has emerged as a potential factor contributing to fragility fractures in T2D patients. However, there is sparse evidence regarding whether T2D patients have decreased bone material properties compared with non-diabetic controls. We hypothesized that increased production of advanced glycation endproducts (AGEs) has an important role in reducing bone material strength in patients with and without diabetes. Thus, we used the OsteoProbe®, a bone microindentation device that provides an index of cortical bone material properties (Bone Material Strength index – BMSi) in men with T2D age ≥ 50 yrs or postmenopausal women with T2D and nondiabetic controls. We also utilized a non-invasive measure of skin AGEs (AGE Reader®) to evaluate AGEs accumulation through skin autofluorescence. Linear regression models were used to assess group differences with and without adjusting for age, Body Mass Index (BMI), and sex. Relationships between variables were assessed using adjusted Pearson correlations. A total of 152 T2D patients (mean age 68.5 ±7.6 yrs.; 59.2% men; HbA1C=7.7 ±1.0%; mean diabetes duration 15.5 yrs.) and 105 non-diabetic controls (mean age 67.2±8.8 yrs.; 41.0% men; HbA1C =5.4 ±0.3%) were recruited to the study. Overall, there was no difference in BMSi between T2DM and control subjects: unadjusted (p= 0.636); adjusted (p= 0.695). However, skin AGEs were negatively correlated with BMSi (r= -0.23, p <0.001). In subgroup analyses, skin AGEs were also negatively associated with BMSi in both T2DM (r= -0.23, p=0.004) and control (r= -0.21, p=0.033) subjects. In conclusion, these findings demonstrate that a higher burden of AGEs is associated with worse bone quality. Our findings may explain the conflicting findings regarding reductions in BMSi in T2D because only T2D patients with a high level of AGEs accumulation have impaired BMSi. Moreover, the association of skin AGEs with BMSi in non-diabetic subjects emphasizes the important role of AGEs in decreasing bone quality and potentially contributing to fracture risk. Collectively, our data indicate that non-invasive skin AGEs measurement could be used as a tool to evaluate bone quality in patients with T2D as well as in the non-diabetic population.