Citations

Background: The rising incidence of PCNSL in the elderly represents an unmet need with an undefined standard approach [Villano Br J Cancer 2011]. High-dose methotrexate-based (HD-MTX) therapy is feasible and effective in older patients, but outcomes in this population remain poor. Despite high response rates to HD-MTX induction therapy, poor candidacy for intensive consolidative therapy results in transient disease control that may benefit from maintenance strategies [David Am J Hematol 2023]. Lenalidomide (len) has demonstrated activity in PCNSL even at low doses and represents a potential alternative to consolidation considering its extensive use in maintenance settings [Vu Br J Haematol 2019]. Anecdotal activity in PCNSL by checkpoint inhibitors such as nivolumab (nivo) has been reported [Nayak Blood 2017], and its immune response may be enhanced by len [Görgün Clin Cancer Res 2015]. A051901 evaluates the feasibility of the addition of len and nivo to rituximab (R) and HD-MTX as first line induction therapy followed by len-nivo maintenance in elderly patients with PCNSL not eligible for intensive consolidation. Study Design and Methods: This is a single-arm phase 1 multicenter US study (NCT04609046) conducted by the Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology with a traditional 3+3 design. Eligible patients are 18 years of age or older with untreated diffuse large B-cell lymphoma PCNSL diagnosed through brain biopsy or resection, or cerebrospinal (CSF) or vitreous fluid not considered candidates for high dose chemotherapy consolidation. This study is available to all eligible patients, regardless of race, gender, or ethnic origin. Patients must have adequate end-organ function including creatinine clearance of at least 50 mL/min. Use of systemic corticosteroids for disease control to be tapered after initiation of therapy is allowed. Induction consists of six 14-day cycles with rituximab 500 mg/m2 i.v. on day 1, HD-MTX 3g/m2 i.v. on day 2. In the most recent treatment schedule, a 5-day course of lenalidomide PO at different dose levels (dose level (DL) 1 = 10 mg, DL2 = 15 mg, DL3 = 20 mg) is initiated immediately after adequate clearance of HD-MTX. Once a maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of len is defined, a subsequent cohort will evaluate the addition of nivo 240 mg i.v. to the day 14 of the induction cycle of R-HD-MTX plus len at the MTD. Patients who present any clinical benefit from induction with at least stable disease by International PCNSL Collaborative Group response criteria are eligible for maintenance - twelve 28-day cycles of therapy with len 15 mg PO from day 1 to day 21 (regardless of dose during induction) +/- nivo 480 mg i.v. on day 1 (for those who received len and nivo during induction). The primary endpoint of the induction therapy is the MTD of len when given in combination with R-HD-MTX; the primary endpoint of maintenance is its feasibility, defined as the proportion of patients able to remain on maintenance for at least 6 cycles. As of July 2024, 16 patients have been enrolled with a maximum expected sample size of 47 patients with the assumption of 75% of patients being eligible to proceed with maintenance and 50% of those who begin maintenance not progressing in the first 6 cycles. Overall response, adverse events, progression-free and overall survival will be evaluated in all eligible patients with a focus on the outcome of patients treated at the MTD. For patients who consent to biobanking, diagnostic tissue, peripheral blood and CSF from different timepoints are collected and banked with planned exploratory analyses including whole exome sequencing, circulating tumor DNA, proteomics, metabolomics. Support: U10CA180821, U10CA180882. https://acknowledgments.alliancefound.org.

Introduction: Inotuzumab ozogamicin (INO) is an antibody targeting CD22 conjugated with a cytotoxic antitumor antibiotic (calicheamicin) approved for treatment of relapsed/refractory CD22 positive B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) (Kantarjian et al. NEJM 2017). CD22 is expressed on the surface of lymphoblasts in ALL (~95%). Young adult patients (pts) 18-39 years (yrs) treated on the pediatric regimen CALGB 10403 resulted in a 3-yr event-free survival (EFS) of 59% (95% CI: 52-67%) and an estimated 3-yr overall survival (OS) of 73% (95% CI: 68-78%) (Stock et al. Blood 2019). Alliance A041501(NCT03150693), a phase 3 NCTN sponsored cooperative group trial was conducted to determine if the addition of INO to the CALGB 10403 pediatric regimen would significantly improve EFS. Methods: Eligibility included pts 18-39 years with newly diagnosed CD22 positive ALL, defined as baseline expression in > 20% of lymphoblasts by local institution. Pts with Burkitt-type ALL, BCR::ABL1 positive ALL, or Down syndrome were excluded. Eligible pts received the CALGB 10403 regimen modified to omit extended induction, include dexamethasone as opposed to prednisone as steroid backbone, cap the pegaspargase dose to 3750 units, and adding rituximab for pts with CD20 expression (> 20%). An amendment added blinatumomab for minimal residual disease (MRD) positivity. Pts achieving a complete remission (CR/CRi) or partial remission (PR) were eligible for randomization. Following a 6 pt safety run-in with INO, pts were randomized 1:1 to receive INO or continue CALGB 10403 backbone. Two cycles of INO (1.5 mg/m2/cycle) were administered following induction in the experimental arm. Pts were stratified by age, disease status post induction (M0/M1 vs M2), CD20 status, and LDA Card, which tests for the Ph-like status. The primary endpoint was to determine if the addition of INO would improve the EFS of the pediatric regimen CALGB 10403 without censoring for stem cell transplant (SCT). Key secondary endpoints included the impact of INO on disease-free survival (DFS), OS, and MRD. The Alliance Data and Safety Monitoring Board halted enrollment after 273 out of a planned 341 pts were registered because of increased grade (gr) 5 events in the INO arm compared with the control arm. Results: 273 pts were enrolled between 6/15/2018, and 5/24/2022. Median age was 27.0 yrs, 65.2% were White, 30.4% were Hispanic, and 63.4% were male. Baseline CSF analysis revealed 14% with CNS-2/3 disease. The overall CR rate was 86.8% (82.8-90.8%). 46 pts were not randomized due to death (5), withdrawal (6), ineligibility (3), toxicity (5), receipt of non-protocol therapy (8), progression (5), and other (14). 227 eligible pts were randomized 1:1 to receive INO (N=111) or not (N=116)). For randomized pts, 92.5% achieved M0/M1 marrow status, 48.9% had a positive LDA Card defining Ph-like ALL, 50.7% were CD20 positive. Only 36 pts (13%) received a SCT. With a median follow up of 28.3 months for randomized pts, 3-yr EFS was 69.0% (59.1-80.5%) for the INO arm and 66.7% (57.1-78.1%) for the control (HR=0.97; 0.58-1.63). Similarly, the 3-yr OS was 79.4% (71.0-88.7%) for the INO arm and 80.3% (71.9-89.6%) for the control (HR=1.05; 0.55-2.01). The MRD undetectable rate at Course II Day 56 was 80.6% in the INO arm and 74.2% in the control arm. Univariate analysis suggests improved EFS with INO in pts with a positive LDA card (Ph-like ALL) and of Hispanic ethnicity. There were 22 gr 5 events, 7 occurred prior to randomization. Of the 15 gr 5 events on the randomized cohort, 12 were reported in the INO arm and 3 in the control arm. Of the 12 gr 5 events in the INO arm, all occurred during intensive consolidation courses complicated by prolonged pancytopenia infection/sepsis (8), hepato-biliary in setting of infection (2), multi-organ failure (1), or post-surgical complication (1). These events occurred after INO during Course II (3), Course III (5), or Course IV (4). Conclusions: Although this trial did not meet the primary EFS endpoint for the addition of INO to the pediatric regimen CALGB 10403, these data provide compelling evidence for continued use of pediatric regimens in young adults with ALL as the EFS and OS compares favorably with prior published results. INO may still be efficacious if late toxicity can be mitigated. A pilot study is planned that will decrease INO dose, add 2 cycles of blinatumomab and strict infectious prophylaxis guidelines. Support: U10CA180821, U10CA180882

The NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) for acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) provide recommendations for management of ALL, with a focus on the classification of ALL subtypes based on immunophenotype and cytogenetic/molecular markers; risk assessment and stratification for risk-adapted therapy; treatment strategies for Philadelphia chromosome (Ph)-positive and Ph-negative ALL for both adolescent and young adult and adult patients; and supportive care considerations. This selection from the NCCN Guidelines for ALL focuses on treatment recommendations for adults with newly diagnosed Ph-negative ALL based on current evidence.

AbstractIntroductionRelapsed or refractory (r/r) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) or lymphoblastic lymphoma (LL) remains a therapeutic challenge. Preclinical data in both B‐ and T‐ALL suggests synergy of venetoclax (VEN) with vincristine (VCR). We designed a phase I/II trial (EA9152) of the combination of L‐VCR and VEN for patients with r/r B‐or T‐cell ALL or LL. Here, we report the safety and efficacy outcomes of the phase I portion of this trial (NCT03504644).MethodsIn a 3+3 dose escalation design, r/r ALL subjects were given single‐agent VEN doses reaching 400, 600, or 800 mg for the three respective dose levels. Weekly L‐VCR at 2.25 mg/m2 IV was started on D15 of cycle 1. The primary phase I objective was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of the combination.ResultsAmong the 18 patients in phase I, grade ≥ 3 treatment‐related adverse events were reported in 89% of treated patients. Two patients (two of three) at dose level 3 experienced dose‐limiting toxicities. Therefore, the MTD of the combination was determined to be dose level 2 (VEN 600 mg). Twenty‐two percent of evaluable patients (N = 4) achieved a complete response, with two of them showing no evidence of measurable residual disease (MRD).ConclusionThe combination of VEN and L‐VCR was found to be safe for patients with r/r ALL and encouraging preliminary efficacy, including MRD negative responses. With the removal of L‐VCR from the US market, the phase 2 portion of this trial is actively enrolling with vincristine sulfate.

Abstract Clonal cytopenia of undetermined significance (CCUS) represents a distinct disease entity characterized by myeloid-related somatic mutations with a variant allele fraction of ≥2% in individuals with unexplained cytopenia(s) but without a myeloid neoplasm (MN). Notably, CCUS carries a risk of progressing to MN, particularly in cases featuring high-risk mutations. Understanding CCUS requires dedicated studies to elucidate its risk factors and natural history. Our analysis of 357 patients with CCUS investigated the interplay between clonality, cytopenia, and prognosis. Multivariate analysis identified 3 key adverse prognostic factors: the presence of splicing mutation(s) (score = 2 points), platelet count of <100 × 109/L (score = 2.5), and ≥2 mutations (score = 3). Variable scores were based on the coefficients from the Cox proportional hazards model. This led to the development of the clonal cytopenia risk score (CCRS), which stratified patients into low- (score of <2.5 points), intermediate- (score of 2.5 to <5), and high-risk (score of ≥5) groups. The CCRS effectively predicted 2-year cumulative incidence of MN for low- (6.4%), intermediate- (14.1%), and high-risk (37.2%) groups, respectively, by the Gray test (P < .0001). We further validated the CCRS by applying it to an independent CCUS cohort of 104 patients, demonstrating a c-index of 0.64 (P = .005) in stratifying the cumulative incidence of MN. Our study underscores the importance of integrating clinical and molecular data to assess the risk of CCUS progression, making the CCRS a valuable tool that is practical and easily calculable. These findings are clinically relevant, shaping the management strategies for CCUS and informing future clinical trial designs.

7012 Background: DLBCL with expression of MYC and BCL2 (double expressor lymphoma, DEL), has an adverse prognosis. Venetoclax, an inhibitor of BCL2, was previously studied in combination with R-CHOP. A051701 is a phase II/III randomized trial of chemoimmunotherapy +/- venetoclax in DEL and double hit lymphoma cohorts. Here we report initial phase II results from the DEL cohort. Methods: Patients (pts) age ≥ 18 years (y) with untreated DEL were randomized 1:1 to R-CHOP (Arm 1) or R-CHOP-venetoclax (Arm 2). DEL was defined as MYC expression ≥40% and BCL2 expression ≥50%, without double hit cytogenetics. Enrollment was based on local pathology results that were centrally confirmed. Venetoclax 800 mg was given orally days 4-8 of cycle 1 and days 1-5 of subsequent cycles for up to 6 cycles. All cycles were supported by GCSF or peg-GCSF. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) with 84% power to detect a HR of 0.518 corresponding to 2y PFS rate of 65% in Arm 1 and 80% in Arm 2 (1-sided α=0.20). Results: 119 DEL pts were enrolled: 60 Arm 1; 59 Arm 2. Analyses were performed for the modified intent-to-treat population, defined as eligible pts with confirmed DEL histology (n=113; 56 Arm 1, 57 Arm 2). Median age was 64 y (range 22-85); baseline demographic factors were well balanced except for advanced stage (more common in Arm 1; (77% vs 60%, p=0.051). Most pts were non-germinal center B cell-like by immunohistochemistry (Arm 1 72%, Arm 2 58%), high-intermediate/high risk IPI (Arm 1 54%, Arm 2 51%) and ECOG performance status 0-1 (Arm 1 95%, Arm 2 86%). BCL2 rearrangements were detected in 25% and 33% of pts on Arm 1 and Arm 2, respectively. Most pts completed therapy per protocol (84% Arm 1, 75% Arm 2). Median follow up is 27 months (m). No difference in PFS was observed with 12-m PFS estimates of 77% in Arm 1, 76% in Arm 2 [HR = 0.98 (95% CI: 0.48 – 2.01), p=0.95]. The end of treatment (EOT) overall and complete response rates among patients with an EOT assessment were 87.5% and 70% in Arm 1, and 90% and 82% in Arm 2. Overall survival (OS) was not statistically significantly different with 12-mo OS estimates of 94% in Arm 1 and 79% in Arm 2 [HR = 1.27 (95% CI: 0.57 – 2.79), p=0.56]. Grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs) occurred more frequently in Arm 2 (42% vs 76%). The most commonly increased grade ≥3 AEs included neutropenia (20% vs 47%), anemia (4% vs 25.5%), thrombocytopenia (5.5% vs 24%), febrile neutropenia (7% vs 16%) and fatigue (0% vs 11%). No grade 5 AEs on treatment were reported on Arm 1, and 3 were reported on Arm 2 (lung infection and sudden death NOS, both possibly related; respiratory failure, unlikely related). Conclusions: Adding venetoclax to R-CHOP in DEL pts did not improve PFS and resulted in increased toxicity. The study did not meet its primary endpoint in phase II, and so did not proceed to phase III. Clinical trial information: NCT03984448 .

Abstract A041202 (NCT01886872) is a phase 3 study comparing bendamustine plus rituximab (BR) with ibrutinib and the combination of ibrutinib plus rituximab (IR) in previously untreated older patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). The initial results showed that ibrutinib-containing regimens had superior progression-free survival (PFS) and rituximab did not add additional benefits. Here we present an updated analysis. With a median follow-up of 55 months, the median PFS was 44 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 38-54) for BR and not yet reached in either ibrutinib-containing arm. The 48-month PFS estimates were 47%, 76%, and 76% for BR, ibrutinib, and IR, respectively. The benefit of ibrutinib regimens over chemoimmunotherapy was consistent across subgroups of patients defined by TP53 abnormalities, del(11q), complex karyotype, and immunoglobulin heavy chain variable region (IGHV). No significant interaction effects were observed between the treatment arm and del(11q), the complex karyotype, or IGHV. However, a greater difference in PFS was observed among the patients with TP53 abnormalities. There was no difference in the overall survival. Notable adverse events with ibrutinib included atrial fibrillation (afib) and hypertension. Afib was observed in 11 patients (pts) on BR (3%) and 67 pts on ibrutinib (18%). All-grade hypertension was observed in 95 pts on BR (27%) and 263 pts on ibrutinib (55%). These data show that ibrutinib regimens prolong PFS compared with BR for older patients with treatment-naïve CLL. These benefits were observed across subgroups, including high-risk groups. Strikingly, within the ibrutinib arms, there was no inferior PFS for patients with abnormalities in TP53, the highest risk feature observed in CLL. These data continue to demonstrate the efficacy of ibrutinib in treatment-naïve CLL.

Background: The anti-apoptotic protein Mcl-1 contributes to the pathophysiology of certain B-cell malignancies and AML, and dependence on Mcl-1 is associated with resistance to venetoclax. Efforts to target Mcl-1 through direct inhibition have faced challenges due to cardiovascular toxicities. Voruciclib, a potent oral CDK9 inhibitor (CDK9i), was shown to indirectly downregulate Mcl-1 protein levels and synergize with venetoclax in preclinical models in lymphoid and myeloid malignancies. In solid tumors, voruciclib maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was defined as 350 mg with continuous daily dosing, and 600 mg when used on days 1-14 on a 21-day cycle. This phase 1 study is the first to evaluate the safety, dose-limiting toxicities (DLT), preliminary efficacy, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of voruciclib in R/R hematologic malignancies (NCT03547115). Methods: Patients (pts) with relapsed B-cell NHL, CLL, or AML aged ≥18 years who had ECOG performance status ≤1, disease progression after standard therapies, adequate hepatic and renal function, and no prior CDK9i were eligible. The study followed a 3+3 design and DLTs were assessed in Cycle 1. Voruciclib was administered daily continuously at a starting dose of 50 mg on a 28-day cycle (Cohort I). After 2 DLTs were observed at 100 mg in AML pts, dosing was changed to daily on days 1-14 on a 28-day cycle (Cohort II). Also, pts with prior allogeneic transplant were excluded and dose escalation (100, 150, 200 mg) proceeded separately in AML and B-cell malignancies. Disease response was assessed by investigators using the Lugano, 2008 iwCLL, and 2017 ELN criteria. Results: 40 pts were enrolled: 21 AML, 19 NHL (9 DLBCL, 3 CLL, 3 MCL, 3 FL and 1 MZL). Cohort I enrolled 16 pts, 8 each at 50 mg and 100 mg. Cohort II enrolled 24 pts (17 AML and 7 B-cell malignancies), including 6 at 100 mg, 7 at 150 mg, and 11 at 200 mg. Dose escalation in Cohort II did not reach the MTD and was stopped at 200 mg, a dose that achieved plasma concentrations sufficient for target inhibition. Median age was 70 years (range 40-90), 72.5% of pts were ≥65 years, and 77.5% had ECOG performance status = 1. Pts had a median of 3 prior therapies (range, 1-8). Median duration on drug was 5 weeks (range 1-22). Drug-related serious adverse events (AEs) were reported in Cohort I only. Two pts with AML had a DLT of Grade (Gr) 3 interstitial pneumonitis at 100 mg; both had had allogeneic transplant and active graft versus host disease, one of whom also had a concurrent Gr 3 differentiation syndrome. One pt with DLBCL at 50 mg had Gr 3 hypoxemic respiratory failure in Cycle 4. In Cohort II, no DLTs were observed and there were no non-hematologic Gr 3-5 drug-related AEs. In the overall population, the most common AEs were diarrhea (30%), nausea (25%), anemia (22.5%), fatigue (22.5%), constipation (17.5%), dizziness (15%) and dyspnea (15%) [Table 1). One pt with AML had Gr 3 hyperbilirubinemia. There was no evidence of drug-related neutropenia in pts with NHL. No significant cardiovascular AEs were observed. One pt with AML in Cohort I achieved a morphologic leukemia-free state. At 200 mg, 5 of 10 AML pts (50%) had stable disease. Voruciclib pharmacokinetics was dose proportional, mean accumulation ratio was 2.4, mean T max was 4 hours, and at 200 mg, steady state C max was 925 ng/mL and mean C trough was 442 ng/mL (~1 microM). Analysis of Mcl-1 protein expression in normal lymphocytes by flow cytometry showed a trend of decrease in on-treatment samples compared to pre-treatment. Consistent with this, RNA-Seq analysis of 3 paired CLL samples confirmed rapid (after 6 hours) downregulation of Mcl-1 mRNA transcript in the malignant B-cells. Furthermore, scRNA-Seq analysis of 2 longitudinal AML samples demonstrated downregulation of MYC transcriptional program and oxidative phosphorylation in circulating AML blasts, both evident 24 hours after start of voruciclib and ongoing at C1D15. Conclusions: Voruciclib at doses up to 200 mg administered on 14 consecutive days on a 28-day cycle was well tolerated, with no DLTs observed, and no cardiovascular toxicities. There was no significant myelosuppression in pts with B-cell malignancies. As the safety profile suggested non-overlapping toxicities with venetoclax, the study is now evaluating voruciclib in combination with venetoclax in pts with R/R AML to exploit dual inhibition of Bcl-2 and Mcl-1.

Introduction: AutoHCT is an effective therapy for patients (pts) with DLBCL who are refractory or relapse following first-line chemotherapy, but long term outcomes remain suboptimal. The BTK inhibitor ibrutinib has shown promising activity in pts with ABC-DLBCL (Wilson et al, Nat Med 2015). In 2016 we launched a randomized phase III clinical trial to evaluate the addition of ibrutinib to AutoHCT as part of conditioning and as consolidation therapy for pts with relapsed/refractory ABC-DLBCL. Patients and Methods: Following assessment of open-label treatment in a safety cohort of 6 pts, we randomly assigned pts with chemotherapy-sensitive persistent or relapsed ABC-DLBCL to receive ibrutinib 560 mg [Arm A] or placebo [Arm B] concurrently with conditioning on days -6 to -1 of AutoHCT (Cycle 1). Following count recovery and resolution of acute toxicities, pts continued ibrutinib 560 mg in Arm A or placebo in Arm B for 12 additional 28-day cycles. Crossover to Arm A using single agent ibrutinib was allowed for pts progressing on Arm B. Central pathology review was performed for disease confirmation and subtype assignment. Initially, ABC subtype assignment was performed using the Nanostring Lymphoma Subtyping Test (LST) but the study was amended to use the IHC-based Hans classifier for non-GCB on 8/15/19. Other key eligibility criteria included receipt of no more than 3 prior regimens, no active CNS involvement, no need for long-term anticoagulation, and no prior progression on Ibrutinib. Pts were stratified by time to relapse (<=12 mos vs >12 mos), type of conditioning (BEAM or CBV) and prior ibrutinib use. The original design required 296 patients with 82% power to detect a difference in 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) rates of 67% vs. 50% with a two-sided alpha of 0.05. A revised statistical design allowed an interim futility analysis to be conducted after 40 pts were enrolled and followed for 2 years. Even though the study met criteria to continue accrual to a target of 160 pts, we decided to close it early due to declining accrual on 12/20/2022. We hereby present the primary analysis of the evaluable patients enrolled (data as of 07/17/2023). Results: Between 2/6/17 and 8/24/18, we screened 255 pts but enrolled only 34 (13%) largely due to long assay turnaround times and performance characteristics with the LST. Following the switch to the IHC-based Hans classifier (after 8/15/19), 60 out of 110 pts screened were enrolled (54%) in line with our a priori expectation. In total, 45 pts were randomized to Arm A vs. 43 to Arm B, with 39 and 38, respectively, being evaluable for the primary endpoint at this time. Median age was 61 years (range 20-75 years), median number of prior lines of therapy was 2, 46% of the pts were female, 21% were refractory or had early relapse, 94% were planned to receive BEAM conditioning. Overall, 87% of pts in Arm A and 88% in Arm B underwent conditioning while 70% and 67% respectively, started maintenance therapy. The median number of cycles received was 6 in Arm A vs. 5 in Arm B. The primary endpoint of 2-year PFS was 57.6% (95% CI: 42.1%, 78.8%) in Arm A vs. 40.8% (95% CI: 26.5, 62.8%) in Arm B (HR=0.54; 95% CI: 0.26, 1.10; log-rank p = 0.087). Median PFS was 26.5 months (95% CI: 10.2, not reached [NR]) in Arm A vs. 8.1 months (95% CI: 5.4, NR) in Arm B. Only one pt crossed over to Arm A after progression on Arm B. The most common grade 3-4 AEs in each of the arms were: neutropenia (A: 14%, B: 14%), febrile neutropenia (A: 11%, B: 9%), and thrombocytopenia (A: 11%, B: 7%). Rates of any grade atrial fibrillation were similar between arms (12.8% in Arm A vs. 10.5% in Arm B); one patient had grade 3 and one patient had grade 4 atrial fibrillation, both in Arm B. Six pts had reported grade 5 events (Arm A: 2 sepsis, 1 COVID-19, 1 respiratory failure and 1 disease progression and Arm B: 1 disease progression) but only one grade 5 event (sepsis, Arm A) was deemed probably related to treatment. Conclusions: Despite an early high rate of screen failures and declining accruals due to competition with CAR-T cell therapy, the primary analysis suggests that ibrutinib with and following AutoHCT in relapsed/refractory ABC-DLBCL is well-tolerated and may improve PFS in this high-risk patient population. This trial was supported by: U10CA180821, U10CA180882, U24CA196171; U10CA180820, UG1CA233234 (ECOG-ACRIN); U10CA180868 (NRG); U10CA180888 (SWOG) ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02443077 https://acknowledgments.alliancefound.org