Citations

AbstractBackgroundDue to a substantial decline in pancreas transplantation (PT) across the United States over the past 15 years, we sought to understand the perceptions and practices of US PT programs.MethodsSurveys were sent to members of the American Society of Transplantation Surgeons and the American Society of Transplantation by email and professional society postings between August 2019 and November 2019.ResultsOne hundred twenty three responses were recorded from 56 unique programs. Program characteristics were obtained from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients. Respondents were transplant surgeons (71%), transplant nephrologists (17%), trainees (9%), and allied professionals (3%). Programs were defined according to annual volume as: low (<5 PT/year), intermediate (6–20), or high (>20). High‐volume programs reported that these factors were most important for increased PT: expansion of recipient selection, more aggressive donor utilization, and hiring of PT program‐specific personnel. At both the program and national level, the vast majority (82% and 79%, respectively) felt the number of PTs currently performed are not in balance with patients' needs.ConclusionsOverall, programs reported that the option of PT is not offered adequately to diabetic patients and that strategies to maintain higher PT volume are most evident at intermediate, and especially, high‐volume programs.

Background: Lower patient survival has been observed in sickle cell disease (SCD) patients who go on to receive a kidney transplant. This study aimed to assess the post-transplant outcomes of SCD kidney transplant recipients in the contemporary era. Methods: We used the OPTN/UNOS database to identify first-time kidney transplant recipients from 2010 through 2019. We compared patient and allograft survival between recipients with SCD (n = 105) vs. all other diagnoses (non-SCD, n = 146,325) as the reported cause of end-stage kidney disease. We examined whether post-transplant outcomes improved among SCD in the recent era (2010–2019), compared to the early era (2000–2009). Results: After adjusting for differences in baseline characteristics, SCD was significantly associated with lower patient survival (HR 2.87; 95% CI 1.75–4.68) and death-censored graft survival (HR 1.98; 95% CI 1.30–3.01), compared to non-SCD recipients. The lower patient survival and death-censored graft survival in SCD recipients were consistently observed in comparison to outcomes of recipients with diabetes, glomerular disease, and hypertension as the cause of end-stage kidney disease. There was no significant difference in death censored graft survival (HR 0.99; 95% CI 0.51–1.73, p = 0.98) and patient survival (HR 0.93; 95% CI 0.50–1.74, p = 0.82) of SCD recipients in the recent versus early era. Conclusions: Patient and allograft survival in SCD kidney recipients were worse than recipients with other diagnoses. Overall SCD patient and allograft outcomes in the recent era did not improve from the early era. The findings of our study should not discourage kidney transplantation for ESKD patients with SCD due to a known survival benefit of transplantation compared with remaining on dialysis. Urgent future studies are needed to identify strategies to improve patient and allograft survival in SCD kidney recipients. In addition, it may be reasonable to assign risk adjustment for SCD patients.

Abstract Background The vancapticins are modified vancomycin derivatives developed by adding membrane targeting motifs to the C-terminus of vancomycin. We determined the in vitro activity of a lead vancapticin candidate against periprosthetic joint infection-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in the planktonic and biofilm states, and the effect of adding 0.002% polysorbate 80 (P-80; Sigma-Aldrich) on vancapticin susceptibility testing. Methods Thirty-seven clinical isolates of MRSA collected at Mayo Clinic (Rochester, Minnesota) were studied. Vancapticin minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined using Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institutes guidelines. Minimum biofilm bactericidal concentrations (MBBCs) were determined using a pegged lid microtiter plate assay. Vancapticin MIC and MBBC values were assessed with and without P-80. Vancapticin, vancomycin, and dalbavancin biofilm time-kill assays were performed using biofilms formed by 10 MRSA isolates on Teflon coupons. Results Vancapticin MICs with and without P-80 ranged from 0.015 to 0.12 μg/mL and 0.25 to 1 μg/mL, respectively. Vancapticin MBBCs with and without P-80 ranged from 0.25 to 4 μg/mL and 1 to 8 μg/mL, respectively. Reductions of biofilm bacterial densities on Teflon coupons after 8 and 24 hours of incubation with vancapticin, vancapticin with P-80, vancomycin, or dalbavancin with P-80 were less than 3-log10 cfu/cm2 for all isolates tested. Conclusion Vancapticin has promising in vitro activity against planktonic MRSA and MRSA in a pegged lid biofilm assay, but was not bactericidal against biofilms on Teflon coupons. P-80 decreased vancapticin MICs and MBBCs. Disclosures Mark A. Blaskovich, PhD, MAB Consulting (Consultant)The University of Queensland (Employee, Grant/Research Support, Other Financial or Material Support, Inventor on patent) Robin Patel, MD, Accelerate Diagnostics (Grant/Research Support)CD Diagnostics (Grant/Research Support)Contrafect (Grant/Research Support)Curetis (Consultant)GenMark Diagnostics (Consultant)Heraeus Medical (Consultant)Hutchison Biofilm Medical Solutions (Grant/Research Support)Merck (Grant/Research Support)Next Gen Diagnostics (Consultant)PathoQuest (Consultant)Qvella (Consultant)Samsung (Other Financial or Material Support, Dr. Patel has a patent on Bordetella pertussis/parapertussis PCR issued, a patent on a device/method for sonication with royalties paid by Samsung to Mayo Clinic, and a patent on an anti-biofilm substance issued.)Selux Dx (Consultant)Shionogi (Grant/Research Support)Specific Technologies (Consultant)

Introduction. Marfan syndrome is an autosomal dominant disorder caused by a mutation in the FBN1 gene which affects connective tissue. The features of Marfan syndrome include many musculoskeletal abnormalities which require orthopaedic surgical intervention. Given the expansive phenotypic variations and comorbidities associated with Marfan syndrome, knowledge of perioperative risk factors and potential complications is essential. Case. In this case report, the authors describe a patient with Marfan syndrome who underwent spinal instrumentation and fusion from T3 to L4 for correction of syndromic scoliosis. The patient had a complicated perioperative course requiring significant fluid resuscitation and vasoactive medications to support blood pressure. He required intensive care unit level care for continued hemodynamic instability despite resuscitation in the postoperative period. Common causes of postoperative hypotension such as hypovolemic shock, sepsis, ongoing hemorrhage, and prolonged effects of anesthesia were diagnostically ruled out. Ultimately, the patient’s refractory hypotension was determined to be from mechanical compression, both from prolonged intraoperative prone positioning exacerbated by pectus excavatum and from the surgically corrected spine decreasing the diameter of his thoracic cavity (as referenced by his postoperative Haller index). Conclusion. Mechanical compression of thoracic contents as a result of a worsening chest wall deformity can be a complication of spinal deformity correction.

Trichorhinophalangeal syndrome (TRPS) is a genetic disorder that may pose anesthetic challenges. We present a case of airway management for urgent surgery in a 56-year-old female with TRPS and difficult airway (macroglossia, narrow glottic opening, and hypoplastic epiglottis). Intubation was successful with video laryngoscopy using a size 2.5 pediatric blade and size 5.0 endotracheal tube. During emergence, she experienced bronchospasm and persistent urosepsis, necessitating intensive care unit (ICU) admission. Her pulmonary reserve was hindered by a Morgagni hernia causing lung compression. Our case demonstrates challenges in TRPS including challenging airway, decreased pulmonary reserve, and joint laxity introducing potential for spinal cord injury.