Citations

Abstract Background The past two decades have witnessed a surge in the use of cervical spine joint procedures including joint injections, nerve blocks and radiofrequency ablation to treat chronic neck pain, yet many aspects of the procedures remain controversial. Methods In August 2020, the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine and the American Academy of Pain Medicine approved and charged the Cervical Joint Working Group to develop neck pain guidelines. Eighteen stakeholder societies were identified, and formal request-for-participation and member nomination letters were sent to those organizations. Participating entities selected panel members and an ad hoc steering committee selected preliminary questions, which were then revised by the full committee. Each question was assigned to a module composed of 4–5 members, who worked with the Subcommittee Lead and the Committee Chairs on preliminary versions, which were sent to the full committee after revisions. We used a modified Delphi method whereby the questions were sent to the committee en bloc and comments were returned in a non-blinded fashion to the Chairs, who incorporated the comments and sent out revised versions until consensus was reached. Before commencing, it was agreed that a recommendation would be noted with >50% agreement among committee members, but a consensus recommendation would require ≥75% agreement. Results Twenty questions were selected, with 100% consensus achieved in committee on 17 topics. Among participating organizations, 14 of 15 that voted approved or supported the guidelines en bloc, with 14 questions being approved with no dissensions or abstentions. Specific questions addressed included the value of clinical presentation and imaging in selecting patients for procedures, whether conservative treatment should be used before injections, whether imaging is necessary for blocks, diagnostic and prognostic value of medial branch blocks and intra-articular joint injections, the effects of sedation and injectate volume on validity, whether facet blocks have therapeutic value, what the ideal cut-off value is for designating a block as positive, how many blocks should be performed before radiofrequency ablation, the orientation of electrodes, whether larger lesions translate into higher success rates, whether stimulation should be used before radiofrequency ablation, how best to mitigate complication risks, if different standards should be applied to clinical practice and trials, and the indications for repeating radiofrequency ablation. Conclusions Cervical medial branch radiofrequency ablation may provide benefit to well-selected individuals, with medial branch blocks being more predictive than intra-articular injections. More stringent selection criteria are likely to improve denervation outcomes, but at the expense of false-negatives (ie, lower overall success rate). Clinical trials should be tailored based on objectives, and selection criteria for some may be more stringent than what is ideal in clinical practice.

AbstractBackgroundAdipocyte-derived adiponectin may play a role in the host inflammatory response to cancer. We examined the association of plasma adiponectin with the density of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in colon cancers and with vitamin D, clinicopathological features, and patient survival.MethodsPlasma adiponectin and 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] were analyzed by radioimmunoassay in 600 patients with stage III colon cancer who received FOLFOX-based adjuvant chemotherapy (NCCTG N0147 [Alliance]). TIL densities were determined in histopathological sections. Associations with disease-free survival (DFS), time to recurrence, and overall survival were evaluated by multivariable Cox regression adjusting for potential confounders (ie, body mass index, race, TILs, and N stage). All statistical tests were 2-sided.ResultsWe found a statistically significant reduction in adiponectin, but not 25(OH)D, levels in tumors with high vs low TIL densities (median = 6845 vs 8984 ng/mL; P = .04). A statistically significant reduction in adiponectin was also observed in obese (body mass index >30 kg/m2) vs nonobese patients (median = 6608 vs 12 351 ng/mL; P < .001), in men vs women (median = 8185 vs 11 567 ng/mL; P < .001), in Blacks vs Whites or Asians (median = 6412 vs 8847 vs 7858 ng/mL; P < .03), and in those with fewer lymph node metastases (N1 vs N2: median = 7768 vs 9253 ng/mL; P = .01). Insufficiency of 25(OH)D (<30 ng/mL) was detected in 291 (48.5%) patients. In multivariable analyses, neither adiponectin nor 25(OH)D were associated with a statistically significant difference in DFS, overall survival , or time to recurrence in models adjusted for potential confounders. We found a statistically significant association of TILs with prognosis, yet no such interaction was observed for the association of adiponectin with TILs for DFS.ConclusionsLower circulating adiponectin levels were associated with a statistically significant increase in TIL densities in colon cancers, indicating an enhanced antitumor immune response. In contrast to TILs, neither adiponectin nor 25(OH)D was independently prognostic.

3591 Background: Adiponectin is a peptide hormone exclusively secreted by adipocytes that plays a role in immune regulation and in the host inflammatory response to cancer. We examined postsurgical adiponectin levels in relationship to tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), clinicopathological features, vitamin D status, and patient survival in participants in a phase 3 trial of adjuvant chemotherapy. Methods: Plasma adiponectin and 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] were analyzed by radioimmunoassay in 600 patients with stage III colon carcinoma who received adjuvant FOLFOX +/- cetuximab. TIL densities were determined at light microscopy in routine histopathological sections. The associations between adiponectin and 25(OH)D, TILs, other factors were evaluated by Fisher’s Exact, Chi-squared, t-test, and Kruskal-Wallis tests where appropriate. The association between adiponectin or 25(OH)D with disease-free survival (DFS), time to recurrence (TTR) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated by multivariable Cox regression, adjusting for body mass index (BMI), race, T, N stage, performance status, tumor location, TILs, BRAF/KRAS, and mismatch repair status. Results: A statistically significant and inverse association between adiponectin level and BMI was observed with lower levels found with obesity (BMI > 30 kg/m2) [p < 0.001]. The level of adiponectin was significantly lower in men vs women (p < 0.001), in blacks vs whites or Asians (p < 0.032), and in patients with fewer regional lymph node metastases (N1 vs N2 stage, p = 0.011). A significantly lower level of adiponectin was found in patients whose tumors had high vs low TIL densities (p = 0.040), but was unrelated to 25(OH)D. Insufficiency of 25(OH)D ( < 30 ng/ml) was detected in 291 (49%) of patients and was not associated with TILs. By multivariable analysis, adiponectin was not associated significantly with patient DFS (HRadj= 0.98, 95% CI 0.74-1.29, padj= 0.88) nor with OS nor time-to-recurrence (TTR). TIL densities were significantly prognostic, but 25(OH)D was not (DFS: HRadj= 1.12, 95% CI 0.85-1.47, padj= 0.44). No significant interaction was observed for adiponectin with TILs for the association with DFS. Conclusions: Lower adiponectin levels were associated with significantly increased TIL densities in colon cancers, indicating an enhanced anti-tumor immune response. In contrast to TILs, adiponectin was not independently associated with patient outcome. Nearly one-half of stage III patients were vitamin D insufficient, although 25(OH)D was not prognostic.

This Practice Advisory presents a comprehensive and evidence-based set of position statements and recommendations for the use of contrast media in interventional pain procedures. The advisory was established by an international panel of experts under the auspices of 11 multinational and multispecialty organizations based on a comprehensive review of the literature up to December 31, 2019. The advisory discusses the risks of using gadolinium-based contrast agents. These include nephrogenic systemic fibrosis, gadolinium brain deposition/retention, and encephalopathy and death after an unintentional intrathecal gadolinium injection. The advisory provides recommendations on the selection of a specific gadolinium-based contrast agent in patients with renal insufficiency, those who had multiple gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging examinations, and in cases of paraspinal injections. Additionally, recommendations are made for patients who have a history of mild, moderate, or severe hypersensitivity reactions to contrast medium.

Summary Chronic pain causes significant suffering, limitation of daily activities and reduced quality of life. Infection from COVID ‐19 is responsible for an ongoing pandemic that causes severe acute respiratory syndrome, leading to systemic complications and death. Led by the World Health Organization, healthcare systems across the world are engaged in limiting the spread of infection. As a result, all elective surgical procedures, outpatient procedures and patient visits, including pain management services, have been postponed or cancelled. This has affected the care of chronic pain patients. Most are elderly with multiple comorbidities, which puts them at risk of COVID ‐19 infection. Important considerations that need to be recognised during this pandemic for chronic pain patients include: ensuring continuity of care and pain medications, especially opioids; use of telemedicine; maintaining biopsychosocial management; use of anti‐inflammatory drugs; use of steroids; and prioritising necessary procedural visits. There are no guidelines to inform physicians and healthcare providers engaged in caring for patients with pain during this period of crisis. We assembled an expert panel of pain physicians, psychologists and researchers from North America and Europe to formulate recommendations to guide practice. As the COVID ‐19 situation continues to evolve rapidly, these recommendations are based on the best available evidence and expert opinion at this present time and may need adapting to local workplace policies.

Background The past two decades have witnessed a surge in the use of lumbar facet blocks and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) to treat low back pain (LBP), yet nearly all aspects of the procedures remain controversial. Methods After approval by the Board of Directors of the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, letters were sent to a dozen pain societies, as well as representatives from the US Departments of Veterans Affairs and Defense. A steering committee was convened to select preliminary questions, which were revised by the full committee. Questions were assigned to 4–5 person modules, who worked with the Subcommittee Lead and Committee Chair on preliminary versions, which were sent to the full committee. We used a modified Delphi method, whereby the questions were sent to the committee en bloc and comments were returned in a non-blinded fashion to the Chair, who incorporated the comments and sent out revised versions until consensus was reached. Results 17 questions were selected for guideline development, with 100% consensus achieved by committee members on all topics. All societies except for one approved every recommendation, with one society dissenting on two questions (number of blocks and cut-off for a positive block before RFA), but approving the document. Specific questions that were addressed included the value of history and physical examination in selecting patients for blocks, the value of imaging in patient selection, whether conservative treatment should be used before injections, whether imaging is necessary for block performance, the diagnostic and prognostic value of medial branch blocks (MBB) and intra-articular (IA) injections, the effects of sedation and injectate volume on validity, whether facet blocks have therapeutic value, what the ideal cut-off value is for a prognostic block, how many blocks should be performed before RFA, how electrodes should be oriented, the evidence for larger lesions, whether stimulation should be used before RFA, ways to mitigate complications, if different standards should be applied to clinical practice and clinical trials and the evidence for repeating RFA (see table 12 for summary). Conclusions Lumbar medial branch RFA may provide benefit to well-selected individuals, with MBB being more predictive than IA injections. More stringent selection criteria are likely to improve denervation outcomes, but at the expense of more false-negatives. Clinical trials should be tailored based on objectives, and selection criteria for some may be more stringent than what is ideal in clinical practice.

Abstract Abstract 4723 Introduction: Combination G/A has been shown to be apromising investigational therapy for patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer. A randomized phase II trial was initiated to determine if ODSH, a low anticoagulant heparin derivative that blocks several pancreatic cancer cell survival pathways, would enhance the efficacy of G/A. Preliminary data from the first 10 patients administered ODSH demonstrated an unexpected and profound preservation of peripheral blood counts, despite the highly myelosuppressive G/A regimen they also received. Methods: Patients with previously untreated, metastatic pancreatic cancer were treated with G (1000 mg/m2) and A (125 mg/m2) on days 1, 8, and 15 every 28 days until either disease progression or unacceptable toxicities ensued. ODSH (4 mg/kg bolus followed by a 48 hr. continuous IV infusion at a dose of 0.375 mg/kg/hr for 48 hrs) was administered with each treatment. The first 10 patients received A/G plusODSH with plans for a randomized comparison between A/G with and without ODSH involving 50 patients. Patients were required to have ECOG 0–1 as well as adequate hematological and bilirubin level <1.5 ULN. G-CSF administration was permitted per investigator discretion. Here we present hematological data on the 10 patients treated with A/G plus ODSH. Results: 10 patients were administered up to 5 cycles of G/A plus ODSH. The patients had a median age of 66 years (range, 59 to 75 years) and 50% were male. The median platelet and neutrophil counts prior to each cycle are listed in Table 1. No patients had grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia during any of the cycles. Forty percent of patients had grade 3 neutropenia, but none had grade 4 during any of the cycles. Only 1 patient received 1 dose of G-CSF after day 15 in cycle #1. Conclusions: A previous trial of G/A in patients with previously untreated, metastatic pancreatic cancer reported grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia and neutropenia in 28% (19% grade 3 and 9% grade 4) and 75% (26% grade 3 and 49% grade 4) of patients, respectively (Von Hoff, J Clin Oncol, 2011). With the addition of ODSH to an equivalent chemotherapy regimen in a similar patient cohort, the current trial reported grade 3 thrombocytopenia and neutropenia in 0% and 40% of patients, respectively, with no patients having grade 4 thrombocytopenia or neutropenia. With successive cycles, median platelet counts were stable to improved and a trend existed for reduced neutropenia with ODSH treatment. An explanation for the apparent salutary effects of ODSH on marrow function may involve its interaction with platelet factor 4 (PF4). PF4 is released from the alpha-granules of injured megakaryocytes after chemotherapy delivery. Increased PF4 levels promote thrombocytopenia by inhibiting thrombopoietin production and megakaryopoiesis (Lambert, Blood, 2007; Lambert, Int J Radiation Oncology Biol Phys, 2011). The high molecular weight and strong negative charge of ODSH may result in avid binding to platelet factor 4 (PF4), possibly leading to decreased PF4 levels and more rapid post-chemotherapy platelet recovery (Joglekar, Thromb Haemost, 2012). PF4 may also facilitate neutrophil adhesion to endothelial cells, and reduced PF4 levels from ODSH binding may demarginate and preserve neutrophil values (Kasper, Blood, 2006). Further study of ODSH as a marrow protective agent in myelosuppressivechemotherapy regimens is warranted. Disclosures: Off Label Use: The use of nab-paclitaxel and ODSH in pancreatic cancer. Marcus:Paringenix: Employment, Equity Ownership. Quintana Diez:Paringenix, Inc.: Employment.

TPS475 Background: The prognosis of pancreas adenocarcinoma (PCA) remains poor. A chemotherapy backbone is the current standard of care in PCA. The choice of a chemotherapeutic backbone may impact the efficacy of anti-angiogenic therapy in PCA. Ramucirumab has increased activity with fluoropyrimidines (5FU) because 5FU increases VEGF expression. Methods: This is a double-blind, placebo controlled Phase II study. Subjects will receive either Ramucirumab or a placebo followed by mFOLFIRINOX every two weeks of a 28 day cycle until progression or discontinuation for other reasons. The primary endpoint of this clinical trial is nine month PFS defined as the time from enrollment to the time of progression or death. Among the key inclusion criteria, subjects must have recurrent or metastatic pancreas adenocarcinoma (PCA) with no prior first-line systemic treatment, ECOG PS 0-1, adequate organ function, no DVT, PE or other thromboembolism within three months of randomization. Total number of patient enrolled as of September 19, 2018 is 48 of 85 at eight sites; 27 male (56%), 42 Caucasians (87.5%), three African American (6.2%), one Asian (2%). Median age is 63 (40 - 76). Majority of patients (41) had de novo metastatic disease and six with recurrent disease after surgery. Regimen has been tolerated well with no unanticipated events. Clinical trial information: NCT02581215.

752 Background: Elderly patients (≥65 yrs) with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) are more likely to have comorbid conditions than younger patients ( < 65 yrs), limiting their therapeutic options. As previously reported (Mayer et al. J Clin Oncol 2017;35:abs 3559), FTD/TPI confirmed its clinical profile in mCRC in a real-world setting. Here, we report the safety and tolerability profile of FTD/TPI from the expanded-access program (EAP) in patients aged ≥65 yrs. Methods: Patients (≥18 yrs) with mCRC following ≥2 regimens of anticancer therapy and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1 were enrolled to this open-label EAP. Patients received FTD/TPI 35 mg/m2 twice daily for 5 days followed by 2 days’ rest for 2 weeks, with a 14-day rest period (28-day treatment cycle). Data were collected for therapy duration, treatment discontinuation, and adverse events (AEs). Results: Of 549 patients, 377 (68.7%) were aged < 65 and 172 (31.3%) were ≥65. The treatment duration of FTD/TPI was similar between < 65 and ≥65 yrs (Table). A lower proportion of those aged ≥65 had fatigue and nausea compared with < 65 (Table). However, the frequency of neutropenia and diarrhea was slightly increased in those ≥65 compared with < 65 (Table). One patient (0.6%) in the ≥65 group developed febrile neutropenia compared with 9 (2.4%) in the < 65 group, with no associated deaths in either group. Conclusions: This analysis from the EAP showed that the safety profile and treatment duration of FTD/TPI in patients aged ≥65 with mCRC were similar to those in patients aged < 65. FTD/TPI is well tolerated and can be considered in patients aged ≥65 with mCRC. Clinical trial information: NCT-02286492. [Table: see text]

3559 Background: A Phase 3 clinical trial (RECOURSE) showed that trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) was effective in the treatment of refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treated with standard chemotherapy and targeted-therapy drugs (Mayer et al. N Engl J Med 2015;372:1909-19). An expanded-access program (EAP) was started to provide access to FTD/TPI for patients with mCRC with similar eligibility and to further assess the safety of FTD/TPI in a “real-world” setting in US patients. Methods: Patients aged ≥18 years with refractory mCRC resistant to ≥2 regimens of standard chemotherapy with appropriate biologics and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1 were enrolled to this open-label EAP. Patients received FTD/TPI 35 mg/m2twice daily for 5 days followed by 2 days’ rest repeated twice followed by 14 days’ rest over a 28-day treatment cycle until drug discontinuation. Sites reported duration of therapy, discontinuation due to disease progression, and adverse events (AEs) for each patient. Results: 549 patients were enrolled; 53.2% were male. Median duration of FTD/TPI therapy was 9.7 weeks, which was similar to US patients from RECOURSE (8.9). 10.2% of patients died during the study period, 9.7% due to disease progression. 76.1% of patients discontinued treatment due to disease progression and 4% discontinued due to AEs. Drug-related clinically significant AEs (all grades) are summarized in the table. Conclusions: Patients with refractory mCRC in this EAP had a similar exposure duration to that reported in US patients from RECOURSE, with no unexpected safety concerns. While gastrointestinal toxicity was lower in this population, this may be due to reporting of “significant” events. The clinical profile of FTD/TPI is confirmed in this larger, non-randomized “real-world” experience. Sponsorship: Taiho Oncology, Inc. Editorial Assistance: Complete HealthVizion. Clinical trial information: NCT02286492. [Table: see text]