Citations

Clear

48 citation(s) found for "Cha, Stephen".

Health Care Outcomes and Advance Care Planning in Older Adults Who Receive Home-Based Palliative Care: A Pilot Cohort Study
Chen, Christina Y. , Cha, Stephen S., Hanson, Gregory J. , Rahman, Parvez, Naessens, James M. , Takahashi, Paul Y. , Thorsteinsdottir, Bjorg , Cha, Stephen S., Peterson, Stephanie M. Peck , Takahashi, Paul

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Palliative Medicine | November 6, 2014 | Volume: 18 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 38-44

10.1089/jpm.2014.0150 | PMID 25375663 Get It

Identifying Patients in the Acute Psychiatric Hospital Who May Benefit From a Palliative Care Approach
Burton, M. Caroline , Warren, Mark, Cha, Stephen S., Stevens, Maria , Blommer, Megan, Kung, Simon , Cha, Stephen S., Lapid, Maria I.

Mayo Clinic

American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine® | October 16, 2014 | Volume: 33 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 228-232

10.1177/1049909114554795 | PMID 25318929 Get It

Identifying patients who will benefit from a palliative care approach is the first critical step in integrating palliative with curative therapy. Criteria are established that identify hospitalized medical patients who are near end of life, yet there are no criteria with respect to hospitalized patients with psychiatric disorders. The records of 276 consecutive patients admitted to a dedicated inpatient psychiatric unit were reviewed to identify prognostic criteria predictive of mortality. Mortality predictors were 2 or more admissions in the past year ( P = .0114) and older age ( P = .0006). Twenty-two percent of patients met National Hospice and Palliative Care Organization noncancer criteria for dementia. Palliative care intervention should be considered when treating inpatients with psychiatric disorders, especially older patients who have a previous hospitalization or history of dementia.
Effects of Different Hormone Therapies on Breast Pain in Recently Postmenopausal Women: Findings from the Mayo Clinic KEEPS Breast Pain Ancillary Study
Files, Julia A. , Miller, Virginia M. , Cha, Stephen S., Pruthi, Sandhya , Cha, Stephen S.

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Women's Health | September 30, 2014 | Volume: 23 | Issue: 10 | Pages: 801-805

10.1089/jwh.2014.4871 | PMID 25268853 Get It

Evaluation of the Effect of Decision Support on the Efficiency of Primary Care Providers in the Outpatient Practice
Hankey, Ronald A., Decker, Lindsay K. , Cha, Stephen S., Greenes, Robert A. , Chaudhry, Rajeev , Wagholikar, Kavishwar B. , Cha, Stephen S., Liu, Hongfang

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Primary Care & Community Health | August 26, 2014 | Volume: 6 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 54-60

10.1177/2150131914546325 | PMID 25155103 Get It

Background: Clinical decision support (CDS) for primary care has been shown to improve delivery of preventive services. However, there is little evidence for efficiency of physicians due to CDS assistance. In this article, we report a pilot study for measuring the impact of CDS on the time spent by physicians for deciding on preventive services and chronic disease management. Methods: We randomly selected 30 patients from a primary care practice, and assigned them to 10 physicians. The physicians were requested to perform chart review to decide on preventive services and chronic disease management for the assigned patients. The patients assignment was done in a randomized crossover design, such that each patient received 2 sets of recommendations—one from a physician with CDS assistance and the other from a different physician without CDS assistance. We compared the physician recommendations made using CDS assistance, with the recommendations made without CDS assistance. Results: The physicians required an average of 1 minute 44 seconds, when they were they had access to the decision support system and 5 minutes when they were unassisted. Hence the CDS assistance resulted in an estimated saving of 3 minutes 16 seconds (65%) of the physicians’ time, which was statistically significant ( P < .0001). There was no statistically significant difference in the number of recommendations. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that CDS assistance significantly reduced the time spent by physicians for deciding on preventive services and chronic disease management. The result needs to be confirmed by performing similar studies at other institutions.
Medical Students Familiarity, Experience and Attitudes Towards Complementary and Alternative Medicine
Wahner‐Roedler, Dietlind L. , Loehrer, Laura L., Cha, Stephen , Bauer, Brent A.

Mayo Clinic

The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine | May 7, 2014 | Volume: 20 | Issue: 5 | Pages: A77-A77

10.1089/acm.2014.5202.abstract Get It

Ia Diastolic Dysfunction: An Echocardiographic Grade
Pandit, Anil , Mookadam, Farouk , Hakim, Fayaz A., Mulroy, Eoin , Saadiq, Rayya A. , Doherty, Mairéad, Cha, Stephen, Seward, James B., Wilansky, Susan

Mayo Clinic

Echocardiography | April 4, 2014 | Volume: 32 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 56-63

10.1111/echo.12600 | PMID 24698472 Get It

ObjectiveTo demonstrate that a distinct group of patients with Grade Ia diastolic dysfunction who do not conform to present ASE/ESE diastolic grading exists.Method and ResultsEchocardiographic and demographic data of the Grade Ia diastolic dysfunction were extracted and compared with that of Grades I and II in 515 patients. The mean of age of the cohort was 75 ± 9 years and body mass index did not differ significantly between the 3 groups (P = 0.45). Measurements of left atrial volume index (28.58 ± 7 mL/m2 in I, 33 ± 10 mL/m2 in Ia, and 39 ± 12 mL/m2 in II P < 0.001), isovolumic relaxation time (IVRT) (100 ± 17 msec in I, 103 ± 21 msec in Ia, and 79 ± 15 msec in II P < 0.001), deceleration time (248 ± 52 msec in I, 263 ± 58 msec in Ia, and 217 ± 57 msec in II P < 0.001), medial E/e′ (10 ± 3 in I, 18 ± 5.00 in Ia, and 22 ± 8 in II), and lateral E/e′ (8 ± 3 in I, 15 ± 6 in Ia, and 18 ± 9 in II P < 0.001) were significantly different in grade Ia compared with I and II. These findings remained significant even after adjusting for age, gender, diabetes, and smoking.ConclusionPatients with echocardiographic characteristics of relaxation abnormality (E/A ratio of <0.8) and elevated filling pressures (septal E/e′ ≥15, lateral E/e′ ≥12, average E/e′ ≥13) should be graded as a separate Grade Ia group.
Vitamin D levels and left ventricular diastolic function
Pandit, Anil , Mookadam, Farouk , Boddu, Sailaja, Pandit, Aashrayata Aryal, Tandar, Anwar , Chaliki, Hari P. , Cha, Stephen, Lee, Howard R., Aryal Pandit, Aashrayata, Chaliki, Hari

Mayo Clinic

Open Heart | February 18, 2014 | Volume: 1 | Issue: 1 | Pages: e000011

10.1136/openhrt-2013-000011 | PMID 25332778 Get It

Objective To determine the association between serum vitamin D level and left ventricular (LV) diastolic dysfunction. Background Vitamin D deficiency has been shown in observational and prospective studies to be associated with cardiovascular diseases including coronary artery disease, LV hypertrophy and systolic heart failure. Even though diastolic LV dysfunction is an early manifestation of cardiac disease, there is no study that examines whether a deficiency of vitamin D is associated with LV diastolic dysfunction. Method A retrospective observational review of 1011 patients (679 women) was conducted to examine if low 25-OH-vitamin D levels were associated with LV diastolic dysfunction. Results All the LV diastolic dysfunction parameters: left atrial volume index, E/e', e' velocity, LV mass index and deceleration time were not significantly different between patients with 25-OH vitamin D level ≤20 ng/mL vs 25-OH vitamin D level >20 ng/mL. Conclusions Despite growing medical literature suggesting vitamin D deficiency is associated with cardiovascular disease, in this present study there is no significant association of vitamin D levels and LV diastolic performance, including left atrial volume index.
Self-Report of Tobacco Use Status: Comparison of Paper-Based Questionnaire, Online Questionnaire, and Direct Face-to-Face Interview—Implications for Meaningful Use
Steffen, Mark W., Murad, M. Hassan , Hays, J. Taylor , Molella, Robin G., Cha, Stephen S., Hagen, Philip T., Newcomb, Richard D. , Cha, Stephen S., Murad, M Hassan

Mayo Clinic

Population Health Management | January 29, 2014 | Volume: 17 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 185-189

10.1089/pop.2013.0051 | PMID 24476559 Get It

Identifying tobacco use status is essential to address use and provide resources to help patients quit. Being able to collect this information in an electronic format will become increasingly important, as the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services has included the assessment of tobacco use as part of its Stage 1 Meaningful Use criteria. The objective was to compare the accuracy of online vs. paper assessment methods to ascertain cigarette smoking status using a face-to-face structured interview as the gold standard. This was a retrospective analysis of a stratified opportunity sample of consecutive patients, reporting in 2010 for a periodic health evaluation, who completed either a scannable paper-based form or an online questionnaire and underwent a standardized rooming interview. Compared with face-to-face structured interview, the overall observed agreement and kappa coefficient for both methods combined (paper and online) were 97.7% and 0.69 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.51–0.86) . For the online form they were 97.4% and 0.61 (95% CI 0.33–0.90), and for the paper form they were 97.9% and 0.75 (95% CI 0.54–0.96). There was no statistically significant difference in agreement between the online and paper-based methods ( P =0.76) compared with a face-to-face structured interview. Online assessment of tobacco use status is as accurate as a paper questionnaire, and both methods have greater than 97% observed agreement with a face-to-face structured interview. The use of online assessment of tobacco use status has several advantages and more widespread use should be explored. ( Population Health Management 2014;17:185–189)
Comparison of Clinical Risk Stratification for Predicting Stroke and Thromboembolism in Atrial Fibrillation
Aakre, Christopher A. , Cha, Stephen S., Tsang, Teresa S.M. , McLeod, Christopher J. , Cha, Stephen S., Lip, Gregory Y H , Gersh, Bernard J.

Mayo Clinic

Stroke | December 6, 2013 | Volume: 45 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 426-431

10.1161/strokeaha.113.002585 | PMID 24309585 Get It

Background and Purpose— Several accepted algorithms exist to characterize the risk of thromboembolism in atrial fibrillation. We performed a comparative analysis to assess the predictive value of 9 such schemes. Methods— In a longitudinal community-based cohort study from Olmsted County, Minnesota, 2720 residents with atrial fibrillation were followed up for 4.4±3.6 years±SD from 1990 to 2004. Risk factors were identified using a diagnostic index integrated with the electronic medical record. Thromboembolism and cardiovascular event data were collected and analyzed. Results— We identified 350 validated thromboembolic events in our cohort. Multivariable analysis identified age >75 years (odds ratio, 2.08; P <0.0001), female sex (odds ratio, 1.45; P =0.0015), history of hypertension (odds ratio, 3.07; P <0.0001), diabetes mellitus (odds ratio, 1.58; P =0.0003), and history of heart failure (odds ratio, 1.50; P =0.0102) as significant predictors of clinical thromboembolism. The Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation (SPAF; hazard ratio, 2.75; c =0.659), CHADS 2 -revised (hazard ratio, 3.48; c =0.654), and CHADS 2 -classical (hazard ratio, 2.90; c =0.653) risk schemes were most accurate in risk stratification. The low-risk cohort within the CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc scheme had the lowest event rate among all low-risk cohorts (0.11 per 100 person-years). Conclusions— A direct comparison of 9 risk schemes reveals no profound differences in risk stratification accuracy for high-risk patients. Accurate prediction of low-risk patients is perhaps more valuable in determining those unlikely to benefit from oral anticoagulation therapy. Among our cohort, CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc performed best in this purpose.
“Safe Harbor”: Evaluation of a professionalism case discussion intervention for the gross anatomy course
Spampinato, Christine, Wittich, Christopher M. , Beckman, Thomas J. , Cha, Stephen S., Pawlina, Wojciech, Spampinato, Christine M, Cha, Stephen S.

Mayo Clinic

Anatomical Sciences Education | August 26, 2013 | Volume: 7 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 191-198

10.1002/ase.1395 | PMID 24039220 Get It

Medical professionalism is a multifaceted paradigm and is an essential component of medical education. Gross anatomy is a laboratory to teach professionalism, and promoting critical reflection in medical students is a prerequisite to furthering professionalism. The aim of this study was to determine if professionalism case discussions during a Gross Anatomy course improve students' reflections using a validated reflection instrument (12 items; five‐point Likert scale where 1 = Disagree, 2 = Disagree with reservation, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree with reservation, 5 = Agree). Four facilitated reflection sessions were aimed at fostering reflective capacity through reflection on elements of professionalism. Results did not show a significant change between pre‐and postintervention reflection scores (3.45 ± 0.61 vs. 3.48 ± 0.51; P = 0.82). Historical control students were found to have significantly higher reflection scores when compared with postintervention students (3.91 ± 0.53 vs. 3.48 ± 0.51; P < 0.001). However, the historical control students were found to have significantly higher professionalism scores (P = 0.001) as compared with the intervention students. Student satisfaction was high, with 25 of 28 (89.2%) students reporting that the sessions should be included as a component of future anatomy courses. While reflection scores were not significantly increased as a result of the intervention, students expressed appreciation for the opportunity to discuss professionalism issues related to the dissection of cadavers. Additionally, the intervention students had both lower professionalism scores and lower reflection scores, which supports the idea that highly professional students are more capable of reflecting on professionalism. Future studies should determine whether this case discussion intervention improves objective measures of professionalism. Anat Sci Educ 7: 191–198. © 2013 American Association of Anatomists.