Citations

Abstract Background: Endocrine therapy (ET) with aromatase inhibitors (AIs) plus ovarian function suppression (OFS) is a standard endocrine strategy for premenopausal women with ER+/HER2- breast cancer. However, poor tolerability to AI+OFS limits its use, leaving tamoxifen as the only alternative. Prospective studies demonstrated that premenopausal women treated with neoadjuvant ET whose tumors exhibit Ki-67 ≤ 10% following 4 weeks of therapy achieve 5-year distant disease-free survival > 96%. Problematically, only 41% of patients reach this threshold with tamoxifen compared to 78% with AI+OFS (Nitz JCO 2022). (Z)-endoxifen (ENDX) is a potent selective estrogen receptor modulator that dually targets ERα and PKCβ1. At plasma concentrations of 3-5 ng/mL, it inhibits ERα; at ≥ 500 ng/mL, it targets PKCβ1, leading to AKT suppression. The EVANGELINE trial aims to examine endocrine sensitivity in terms of Week 4 Ki-67 in premenopausal women whose baseline Ki-67 > 10%, and objective response rate after 24 weeks of ENDX + goserelin in premenopausal women with baseline Ki-67≤ 10%. Methods: EVANGELINE (NCT05607004) is a multicenter, open-label, Phase 2 study comprised of three parts. Eligible patients are premenopausal women with Stage IIA/IIB ER+/HER2- breast cancer. • Part 1 (PK Run-in): assessed 40mg vs 80mg ENDX (+/- OFS) in 22 patients. • Part 2: patients with baseline Ki-67 >10% were randomized to 40 mg ENDX + goserelin or exemestane + goserelin for 6 months with the primary objective being 4-week ESD rate. Patients with a baseline Ki-67 ≤10% were assigned to a single-arm cohort of 40 mg ENDX monotherapy (no OFS) to evaluate the 24-week endocrine sensitivity disease rate. • Part 3 (replaces Part 2): all patients are treated with ENDX 40mg daily + goserelin every 28 days. A two stage Phase II design was chosen to assess outcomes as follows: Part 3a: Up to 45 patients with baseline Ki-67> 10% to assess Week 4 Ki-67≤ 10% rate is at least 65%. If 9 or more of these patients have a Week 4 Ki-67>10%, enrollment will be stopped due to futility. Otherwise, enrollment will continue. Part 3b: Up to 20 patients enrolled with baseline Ki-67≤ 10% to assess Week 24 objective response rate. Ki-67 levels are determined by central laboratory and images are centrally reviewed. Secondary objectives include safety, tolerability, surgical outcomes, and biomarker analysis using paired biopsies (baseline, week 4) and surgical specimens. Results: The PK run-in (completed Fall 2024) enrolled 22 patients and assessed ENDX doses (40 mg daily vs 80 mg daily (+/-OFS)). The Week 4 Ki-67 ≤ 10% rate with ENDX was 86% and did not differ according to dose. Early safety, PK, efficacy and compliance data supported the selection of 40 mg ENDX daily as the optimal dose. Enrollment in Part 2 began in May 2025. Part 3 will replace Part 2 with simplification of the trial design. Conclusions: EVANGELINE is the first trial to evaluate (Z)-endoxifen + OFS as neoadjuvant therapy in premenopausal ER+/HER2- breast cancer. By targeting both ER and PKC pathways, ENDX may offer a well-tolerated alternative to AI-based regimens and expand endocrine therapy options for this population. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT05607004 Citation Format: M. P. Goetz, V. J. Suman, C. Lopez, H. Erickson, L. Beaulieu, S. S. Hammer, L. Mina, R. Leon-Ferre, K. N. Hunt, M. Piltin, A. Degnim, J. N. Ingle, J. C. Boughey, B. A. Sarah, J. M. Reid, M. Schellenberg, J. R. Hawse, P. Advani, K. Giridhar, F. Batalini, D. Flora, J. M. Jones, N. A. Bagegni, J. Jakub, V. Abramson, V. Dabak, W. J. Irvin, E. Sima, K. Seema, S. C. Quay. A Phase 2 Trial of (Z)-endoxifen + Goserelin as Neoadjuvant Treatment for Premenopausal Women with ER+, HER2-, Breast Cancer (EVANGELINE) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS5-12-16.

Abstract Background: Combinations of antibody-drug conjugates and immunotherapy, such as trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) and rilvegostomig (rilve), respectively, offer promising efficacy but are associated with a heightened risk of drug-induced interstitial lung disease (ILD)/pneumonitis. Early detection and management are critical for optimizing patient safety, yet there are no standard protocols for real-time evaluation. We hypothesized that vigilant monitoring would enable early detection, prevent symptoms, and minimize the chance of treatment delays while testing novel therapeutic combinations that have a potential risk of ILD. Methods: We tested the combination of T-DXd and rilve administered every 3 weeks in the I-SPY2.2 phase 2 platform trial (NCT01042379), which enrolls patients with clinical stage II/III breast cancer commencing neoadjuvant systemic therapy. Given the potential risk of overlapping pulmonary toxicity of these two agents, we added rigorous monitoring with pulmonary function tests (PFTs), six-minute walk test (6MWT), and high-resolution chest CT (HRCT) scanning pretreatment and every 6 weeks thereafter. A real-time safety workflow was implemented, with pre-specified criteria for halting treatment and escalation to the next block of treatment. All abnormal findings reported on chest CT by site radiologist were centrally reviewed in real time by the study pulmonologist (T.K.) and cases of suspected ILD were adjudicated promptly by a safety committee consisting of the pulmonologist and several medical oncologists, enabling early study drug interruption and therapeutic interventions. Toxicity data were evaluated in the first 51 patients treated with T-DXd plus rilve, and a preplanned hold was initiated until safety was ascertained by the data and safety monitoring board. Results: Safety data were evaluated in the first 51 patients receiving T-DXd plus rilve. Eight ILD events were confirmed (15.68% incidence): 5 grade 1, 2 grade 2, and 1 grade 3. One patient had an early chest CT scan because of dyspnea. All cases were identified by HRCT scans; PFTs and 6MWT did not enhance early detection and were subsequently dropped from the monitoring protocol. No patient was symptomatic for more than 24 hours. Radiographic findings resolved within 14-55 days. Patients with grade 2 & 3 ILD were treated with corticosteroids. No cases of ILD required intensive care or escalated therapy beyond steroids. Early treatment escalation to the subsequent block of therapy occurred in 3 patients; all 3 patients were subsequently able to receive appropriate therapy. At the meeting, safety data from all 100 patients treated with this combination will be reported. Conclusion: Real-time, centralized monitoring and adjudication allowed for early detection and prompt management of ILD, which both mitigated severity and supported timely therapeutic management. Among the monitoring tools studied, HRCT scanning performed every 6 weeks proved most effective for early ILD identification; PFT and 6MWT did not enhance early detection. This approach offers a potential framework for future studies assessing pulmonary safety in regimens combining agents that have a known risk for inducing ILD. Citation Format: T. Kulkarni, R. Nanda, H. S. Rugo, C. C. OSullivan, K. M. Kalinsky, J. C. Boughey, P. R. Pohlmann, J. Perlmutter, D. Yee, A. Borowsky, F. Symmans, N. Hylton, L. Van ‘t Veer, C. Yau, L. Esserman. Real-time monitoring for drug-induced interstitial lung disease with Trastuzumab Deruxtecan and Rilvegostomig combination therapy prevents persistent, symptomatic disease: Safety insights from the I-SPY2.2 platform trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS1-01-09.

Abstract Introduction: AC plus a taxane is standard neoadjuvant therapy for high-risk early breast cancer, but AC may be unnecessary for pathologic complete response (pCR) in many patients. I-SPY2 is a phase 2 trial evaluating the use of 12 weeks of paclitaxel +/- an investigational drug followed by AC. Serial measurements of Functional Tumor Volume (FTV) by MRI, inter-regimen biopsies and pathology from surgery were used to determine the contribution of AC to reduction in FTV or pCR. Methods: 1187 patients enrolled between 2010-2022 had serial measurements of FTV. 150 patients received an inter-regimen biopsy. The primary endpoint of I-SPY2 is pCR. To determine how much AC contributed to the reduction in FTV, we calculated the total FTV decrease between pre-treatment and pre-surgery, and then computed the percentage (%) of the total FTV decrease seen after 12 weeks of paclitaxel regimen. We attributed pCRs observed among patients for whom taxane contributed <90% FTV reduction to AC and estimated the % patients achieving pCR from AC. For the subset with inter-regimen biopsy, we estimated the percentage achieving pCR from those patients with invasive cancer present at inter-regimen biopsy. Results: We found that by week 12 (end of taxane), 64% (763/1187) of patients had achieved ≥90% of their total FTV reduction. In 424/1187 (36%) patients had with taxane <90% response, and subsequent AC contributed to more than 10% of the total decrease in FTV. 90 pCRs (21%) were observed among these 424 patients or, overall, approximately 8% of patients achieved pCR from AC after taxane. Of note, 54/1187 (4.5%) patients had no response to a taxane regimen and had decreased in FTV due to AC alone. Of the 54/1187 responding to AC only, there were 11 pCRs. These results varied by response predictive subtypes as shown. When the subpopulation with post-paclitaxel biopsy was examined, 63/150 (42%) patients had invasive cancer at this timepoint. 47 patients received AC and 4/47 (8.5%) achieved a pCR after AC. 13/47 (28%) achieved RCB 0/1. Conclusions: Serial measurements of FTV identifies patients who had a favorable response to a taxane regimen. For those with a suboptimal response, AC provided some contribution to further decrease in tumor volume. However, only a small fraction achieved a complete response. Immune positive and HER2+ (non-luminal) had the biggest benefit, with only 3-6% of other subtypes achieved pCR. Thus, AC can be reserved for those patients with suboptimal response to the initial taxane therapy. I-SPY2.2 utilizes these data to avoid AC by allowing patients to proceed to surgery after serial MRI and biopsy predict a pCR at an early timepoint. While AC remains the standard of care in many neoadjuvant regimens, the low response rates seen in I-SPY2 suggests that more active regimens need to be developed for patients with disease resistant to a taxane based therapy. Citation Format: D. Yee, C. Yau, P. Norwood, D. M. Wolf, P. R. Pohlmann, N. Onishi, L. van 't Veer, A. Borowsky, W. F. Symmans, J. Perlmutter, J. C. Boughey, E. Price, W. Li, I-SPY Investigators, N. Hylton, L. J. Esserman. Quantifying the Contribution of Doxorubicin and Cyclophosphamide (AC) to Pathologic Response Following Neoadjuvant Taxane Therapy: Analysis of the I-SPY2 TRIAL [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD6-09.

Importance Many patients are diagnosed with benign breast lesions; however, evidence- and consensus-based guidelines for the management of benign breast disease (BBD) are limited. Observations The American Society of Breast Surgeons (ASBrS) and the Society of Breast Imaging (SBI) developed guidelines for the management of benign fibroepithelial lesions (FELs) using a modified Delphi consensus methodology and public comment. There was strong consensus that core biopsy–proven concordant fibroadenomas without atypia only require excision if they were symptomatic, patient preferred, attained a certain size, or demonstrated substantive growth over time on clinical examination. There was strong consensus that when removing a fibroadenoma, complete excision without transection of the mass is recommended and surgeons should consider aesthetics, sensation, and other factors when selecting incision placement. Patients with core biopsy–proven concordant fibroadenomas do not require imaging follow-up and may return to age-appropriate screening. Many benign phyllodes tumors (BPTs) present as an FEL on core biopsy, and these lesions along with any lesions with suspicion of or concern for phyllodes tumors (PTs) require surgical excisional biopsy with complete excision of the mass. Re-excision of a BPT is not required for patients with a positive margin for BPT, but a margin re-excision may be considered if the mass was transected or there is concern of residual disease after excisional biopsy. Patients with BPT who have undergone excision do not require follow-up imaging and may return to age-appropriate screening. Conclusions and Relevance Evidence-informed, consensus and expert opinion-based guidelines for the management of benign FELs of the breast were developed. These guidelines provide clarification on the controversial management of benign FELs of the breast. Any practicing clinicians who treat patients with benign FELs should integrate these guidelines into treatment of their patients.

BACKGROUND: Significant disparities persist in timely, guideline-concordant breast cancer treatment across the US, impacting cancer outcomes. The influence of both patient-level and facility-level socioeconomic status (SES) on adherence to Commission on Cancer quality measures remains incompletely understood. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the National Cancer Database to assess associations between patient and facility SES and concordance with timeliness of 3 Commission on Cancer breast cancer quality measures: surgery, multiagent chemotherapy, and radiotherapy, among patients diagnosed from 2018 to 2022. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to evaluate predictors of concordant care, including a composite measure of facility-level social risk. RESULTS: The analytic cohorts included 471,425 patients for surgery, 82,734 for chemotherapy, and 311,523 for radiotherapy. Black race, uninsured status, and lower educational attainment were each independently associated with lower odds of receiving guideline-concordant care across all measures. Patients treated at low-SES facilities had higher odds of receiving timely surgery (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.27, 95% CI 1.24 to 1.31) but lower odds of receiving timely chemotherapy (OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.79 to 0.91) and radiotherapy (OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.92 to 0.97) compared with those at other institutions. Facility type, fragmented care, and comorbidities also contributed to variation in concordance. CONCLUSIONS: Significant disparities in guideline-concordant breast cancer care persist by race, insurance, education, and facility-level social risk, highlighting intervention opportunities to improve outcomes for these already vulnerable populations. These findings highlight the importance of policy and institutional strategies that address both patient- and facility-level barriers to ensure equitable access to high-quality multidisciplinary treatment.

BACKGROUND: To reduce technical variation in cancer surgery, the Commission on Cancer (CoC) recently implemented 6 operative standards as part of its national cancer center accreditation process. CoC sites are evaluated for compliance with these standards through scheduled visits conducted by trained site reviewers. We characterized site reviewers’ perspectives on the implementation of the operative standards. STUDY DESIGN: Twenty interviews were conducted with CoC site reviewers using a semistructured interview guide based on the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance framework. Themes were identified using thematic analysis mapped to the updated Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. RESULTS: Site reviewers viewed the operative standards as an effective starting point for improving technical quality and were optimistic the standards would lead to positive change. Compliance was associated with supportive site leadership, effective interdisciplinary communication, and the availability of adequate personnel and institutional resources. In contrast, resistance from surgeons was identified as a key barrier. CoC site reviewers interpret their role as extending beyond assessing compliance, viewing themselves as advocates, educators, and partners to the sites. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, CoC site reviewers perceive the operative standards favorably. To enhance implementation of the operative standards, efforts should focus on modifiable institutional and individual-level factors, such as leadership support and surgeon engagement. Additionally, the multifaceted role of the site reviewers presents a valuable opportunity to improve compliance by formalizing the supportive relationship between reviewers and sites.

Abstract: Lymphedema is a prevalent, incurable, and morbid condition with the potential to degrade the health and quality of life of patients living with cancer and beyond cancer. Effective long term control requires coordination by an interdisciplinary team to ensure that lymphedema progression, complications, and related disablement are detected and appropriately addressed. This review provides an overview of lymphatic function and lymphedema pathogenesis with focused discussion of the unique characteristics of cancer related lymphedema (CRL) including natural history, clinical presentation, and risk factors for onset and progression. Surgical practice changes and supportive evidence for lymph node sparing and lymphatic reconstruction for CRL prevention are described. The review outlines evaluations to diagnose, stage, and monitor CRL, and characterizes evidence for current CRL prevention and management practices, including surgeries to restore lymphatic function. Multimodal management with complete decongestive therapy remains first line treatment for CRL, though patient-specific customization might be required to optimize patients’ clinical response and quality of life as outlined in the review.

PURPOSE Neoadjuvant immunotherapy (IO) has become the standard of care for early-stage triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), but not yet for other subtypes. We previously developed a clinical-grade mRNA-based immune classifier (ImPrint) predicting response to IO that is now being used in I-SPY2.2 as part of the response predictive subtypes. We report the performance of ImPrint in hormone receptor–positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–negative (HR+HER2–) patients from five IO arms. METHODS A total of 204 HR+HER2– (MammaPrint high-risk) patients from five IO arms (anti–PD-1, anti–PD-L1/poly [ADP-ribose] polymerase inhibitor combination, anti–PD-1/toll-like receptor 9 dual-IO combination, and anti–PD-1 ± lymphocyte activation gene 3 dual-IO combination) and 191 patients from the chemotherapy-only control arm were included in this analysis. Patients were classified as ImPrint+ (likely sensitive) versus ImPrint– (likely resistant), using pretreatment mRNA. Performance of ImPrint for predicting pathologic complete response (pCR) to IO-containing arms was characterized and compared with tumor grade (III), MammaPrint (ultra) High2 risk (MP2), and estrogen receptor (ER)-low (ER ≤ 10%). RESULTS Overall, the pCR rate across the five IO arms was 33%. 26% of HR+HER2– patients were ImPrint+, and pCR rates with IO were 75% in ImPrint+ versus 17% in ImPrint–, with the highest pCR rate >90% in a dual-IO arm. In the control arm, pCR rates were 33% in ImPrint+ and 8% in ImPrint–. Tumor grade (III), MP2, and ER-low showed pCR rates in IO of 45%, 56%, and 63%, respectively, with lower pCR odds ratios (OR < 7.5) compared with ImPrint (OR = 14.5). CONCLUSION Using an accurate selection strategy, HR+HER2– patients could achieve pCR rates similar to what is seen with best neoadjuvant therapies in TNBC and HER2+ (ie, pCR rate >65%-70%). ImPrint, an Food and Drug Administration IDE-enabled assay, may represent a way to identify HR+HER2– patients for IO that best balances likely benefit versus risk of serious immune-related adverse events.