Citations

Introduction: NGS is increasingly being utilized to identify pathogenic somatic and targetable variants in patients with newly diagnosed AML and MDS. Patients with high-risk disease are typically recommended to undergo allo-HCT as consolidation, upon achieving morphological complete remission (CR). But, despite achieving hematologic CR, patients often have detectable somatic variants pre allo-HCT that predict for increased risk of disease relapse. Longitudinal monitoring of somatic variants via NGS at diagnosis, pre-allo-HCT and post allo-HCT can assist in prognostication and identify patients that remain at high risk of relapse despite allo-HCT. Methods: Patients with AML or MDS who underwent a first allo-HCT and completed NGS testing at day +100 between years 2016 to 2021 were identified from the transplant registry of Mayo Clinic in Florida. The primary aim of the study was to evaluate the prognostic impact of detectable variants via NGS at day +100 days post allo-HCT on the following outcomes: 1) overall survival (OS), 2) relapse, 3) progression-free survival (PFS), and 4) non-relapse mortality (NRM). Disease risk was assessed based on European Leukemia Network (ELN) 2022 risk classification for AML and Revised International Prognostic Scoring System (R-IPPS) for MDS. Baseline variables were compared between patients with and without mutation at day +100 days post allo-HCT using Wilcoxon rank sum test for continuous variables and Fisher's exact test for categorical variables. Kaplan-Meier (KM) method was used to estimate freedom from events at different time points and draw corresponding survival curves. Results: 105 patients who underwent allo-HCT for AML and MDS and completed NGS testing at day +100 were included in the study population. Median age of the study population was 63 years (22-74) and 58% were of the male gender. Median HCT comorbidity score (HCT-CI) and KPS Karnofsky performance score (KPS) were 3 (0-8) and 90 (60-100), respectively. Matched unrelated donor (50%) and peripheral blood stem cells (98%) were the most common donor and graft source, respectively. Median number of lines of therapy pre allo-HCT was 1(0-6) and 52 (50%) patients had detectable variants after completion of chemotherapy and prior to allo-HCT. Seventeen (16%) had detectable variants via NGS on day +100. Eleven (65%) of these 17 had variants pre-allo-HCT and amongst the 88 patients with no variants post allo-HCT, 41 (47%) had detectable variants pre allo-HCT. There was no significant difference in baseline characteristics between patients with detectable variants at day+100 versus those who did not except for a higher KPS in patients with no variants at Day +100 of 90 (60-100) vs. 80 (60-100) (p=0.003). At a median follow up of 1.4 years (0.1-5.5), presence of a variant at day +100 was associated with inferior 4-year OS (32% vs. 69%, p<0.001) and higher relapse risk (64% vs. 23%, p<0.001). In univariate models, a lower KPS and presence of variants post allo-HCT were significantly associated with inferior OS, high relapse risk and worse PFS. Presence of variants pre allo-HCT was associated with an inferior PFS but did not impact OS or relapse risk. In multivariate models, KPS remained significant for OS, PFS and NRM; presence of variants at day +100 post allo-HCT approached significance for OS (p=0.06) and PFS (p=0.08) and was significant for relapse risk (p=0.002) (Table1) (Figure 1). Data regarding longitudinal evolution of variants and impact of individual variants on long term outcomes will be included at the time of presentation. Conclusion: These results indicate that presence of detectable somatic variants at day +100 is associated with poor long-term outcomes and predicts for high risk of disease relapse. Longitudinal monitoring of somatic variants via NGS should be consistently incorporated in the management of patients with high-risk AML and MDS undergoing allo-HCT. Patients with detectable somatic variants post allo-HCT should be considered for additional intervention to mitigate relapse risk.

Purpose The predominant pattern of relapse for patients with B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) who undergo anti-CD19 Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-cell Therapy (CART) involves sites previously involved by NHL. Bridging radiotherapy (BRT) has shown to be an effective bridging treatment with excellent local control rates. Our previous work defined limited/oligometastatic lymphoma as disease involving <5 sites. This study is the first to report on the role of BRT for patients with limited (<5 involved sites) disease prior to CART. Methods Following Institutional Review Board approval, a retrospective review from 2018 to 2023 across 3 Mayo Clinic sites (Arizona, Florida, and Minnesota) was performed and identified 139 patients with relapsed/refractory (r/r) B-cell NHL without bone marrow involvement who received CART and had <5 disease sites prior to leukapheresis. Ann Arbor staging was used to define the number of involved disease sites. An involved disease site included the Ann Arbor anatomical lymph node region(s) harboring the pathological lymph node(s) or any extranodal lesion. Bridging treatment (radiation and/or systemic therapy) was defined as treatment administered between leukapheresis and CART infusion. The primary endpoint was event-free survival (EFS),defined from CART infusion to any disease progression or initiation of post-CART consolidative/salvage therapy. Secondary endpoints included progression -free survival (PFS),defined from CART infusion to any disease progression, and overall survival (OS), defined from CART infusion to death. Results Prior to CART infusion, 44 (32%) patients received BRT and 95 (68%) did not. Bridging systemic therapy was given to 5 (11%) and 34 (36%) patients in the BRT and no BRT groups, respectively (p=0.003). The median number of involved disease sites prior to leukapheresis was 2 (range: 1-4). There was no significant difference in the baseline characteristics prior to CART infusion between the BRT and no BRT groups, except for extranodal involvement that was more common in the BRT group (Table 1). The median equivalent 2 Gy dose was 27 Gy (Interquartile range 23-34), and the most common BRT regimen was 20 Gy in 5 fractions. Among the 44 BRT patients, 34 received radiation to all visible PET-avid disease sites, and 10 received radiation to some but not all disease sites. The median follow-up was 20 months. The rate of grade ≥2 cytokine release syndrome was 41% in both groups (p=0.99). The rate of grade ≥2 immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome was 21% and 37% in the BRT and no BRT groups, respectively (p=0.059). There were no observed grade ≥3 BRT-related toxicities. Objective response rate by PET 5 point scale was higher in the BRT group (93% versus 79%; p=0.036). Crude rates of progression were 30% in BRT and 55% in no BRT patients, with 9/13 (69%) and 43/52 (83%) patients relapsing in pre-existing sites of disease present prior to CART infusion in the BRT and no BRT group, respectively. Seven (16%) BRT patients relapsed in the radiation field. The 2-year EFS was 50% in the BRT group and 39% in the no BRT group (p=0.01). The 2-year PFS was 55% in the BRT group and 45% in the no BRT group (p=0.017). The 2-year OS was 55% in the BRT group and 62% in the no BRT group (p=0.7). Intriguingly, patients who received BRT to all visible PET-avid disease sites (n=34) had further improvement in 2-year EFS (67% vs 39%, p=0.003) and 2-year PFS (71% vs 46%, p=0.008) compared to no BRT or patients who received BRT to some but not all visible disease sites (n=105). Nine patients (2 in BRT and 7 in no BRT groups) received consolidative radiotherapy for day 30 residual disease with only one patient subsequently experiencing progression. Twenty-five patients (6 in BRT and 19 in no BRT groups) received salvage/palliative RT for post-CART relapsed disease. Thirty-seven (39%) patients in the no BRT group remained without disease progression and did not receive radiation in the bridging, consolidative or salvage/palliative setting. Conclusion Bridging radiotherapy prior to CART infusion for patients with limited (<5 involved disease sites) r/r NHL appears to improve response rate, EFS, and PFS without causing significant toxicities. Approximately one third of patients who do not receive BRT will require subsequent post-CART radiation, and another third will remain free of radiation and disease progression.

Availability of haploidentical donors has broadened utilization of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT). Peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) are being used with increased frequency in haploidentical allo-HCT. We evaluated extent of HLA disparity (2–3/8 versus 4/8 HLA antigen mismatches) on post-allograft outcomes when using T-cell replete PBSC from haploidentical donors for acute myeloid leukemia in first complete remission. Primary objectives entailed assessing cumulative incidence of grade 2–4 acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and chronic GVHD (any grade). A total of 645 patients received a haploidentical allo-HCT from a donor with either 2–3 of 8 HLA antigen mismatches (n = 180) or with 4 of 8 HLA antigen mismatches (n = 465). Presence of 2–3 of 8 versus 4 of 8 HLA mismatches did not affect the incidence of acute GVHD (grade 2–4) and chronic GVHD (any grade). Overall survival (OS), leukemia-free survival (LFS) relapse incidence (RI), nonrelapse mortality and the composite endpoint of GVHD-free relapse-free survival were also similar among the groups. Pertaining to HLA-B leader matching effect, our analysis did not discern any difference in aforementioned post-allograft outcomes for this variable. However, in univariate analysis, absence of an antigen mismatch in HLA-DPB1 showed a trend for better OS. Notwithstanding inherent limitations associated with registry data, our results did not show an advantage of selecting a haploidentical donor with 2–3 of 8 HLA antigen mismatches over one with 4 of 8 HLA antigen mismatches when using PBSC as the cell source. Adverse cytogenetics remains a major adverse determinant of inferior OS and LFS and a higher RI. Using reduced-intensity conditioning yielded worse OS and LFS.

Abstract Intravascular lymphoma (IVL) is a rare extranodal non‐Hodgkin lymphoma. We performed a retrospective analysis of 55 IVL patients who were treated at our institution 2003–2018. Median age at diagnosis was 68 years, and 64% were males. The most frequent presenting symptoms were skin rash 43% and weight loss 30%. MRI brain on IVL patients with CNS involvement (CNS‐IVL) showed multifocal involvement in 76% (13/17). 89% (17/19) of non‐CNS‐IVL patients with abnormal FDG‐PET had biopsy of an avid lesion resulting in definitive diagnosis. The top diagnostic biopsy site was the bone marrow (45%). 56% had multiorgan involvement. Based on CNS involvement, 36.5% (20/55) had CNS‐IVL and 63.5% (35/55) had non‐CNS‐IVL. CNS‐IVL group consists of clinically isolated CNS involvement (CNS‐only IVL) (22%;12/55) and mixed clinical CNS and peripheral site involvement (M‐IVL) (14.5%; 8/55). Non‐CNS‐IVL group consists of clinically isolated skin involvement (skin‐only IVL) (9%; 5/55) and peripheral IVL with or without skin involvement (P‐IVL); (54.5%; 30/55). Skin involvement was predominantly in the lower extremities. Pathologically, 89% (48/54) were B‐cell IVL. Rituximab + high‐dose methotrexate‐based regimen were used in 75% (12/16) of CNS‐IVL patients and RCHOP in 60% (17/28) of non‐CNS‐IVL patients. Estimated 5‐year progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) for the entire cohort were 38.6% and 52%, respectively. Skin‐only IVL was associated with excellent survival. Platelet count <150x10 9 /L, age > 60Y, and treatment without Rituximab were poor prognostic factors. Further research is necessary to identify novel therapies.