Citations

Importance Many patients are diagnosed with atypical lesions or lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS); however, evidence- and consensus-based guidelines for the management of many of these lesions are limited. Observations The American Society of Breast Surgeons, in collaboration with the Society of Breast Imaging and College of American Pathology, assembled a steering group to create guidelines for the management of atypical lesions and LCIS, inclusive of flat epithelial atypia (FEA), atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH), atypical lobular hyperplasia (ALH), classic LCIS (C-LCIS), and the variant LCIS forms pleomorphic LCIS (P-LCIS) and florid LCIS (F-LCIS). The natural history of ADH, ALH, and C-LCIS suggests that these lesions are associated with an elevated future breast cancer risk; therefore, patients diagnosed with these lesions should be recommended to undergo comprehensive risk assessment and counseling about breast cancer risk-reducing strategies. The magnitude of future breast cancer risk associated with P-LCIS and F-LCIS remains uncertain, yet if these lesions are determined to be hormone receptor positive, risk-reducing medications should be considered. There is no evidence that FEA is associated with an elevated future breast cancer risk. A second pathology review confirmation is recommended for ADH, should be considered for FEA, and is not necessary for ALH or LCIS. Currently available evidence supports the need to diagnostically excise most ADH, P-LCIS, and F-LCIS cases identified on core biopsy, although some ADH cases fulfilling strict criteria and multidisciplinary consensus can be observed. P-LCIS and F-LCIS require a negative margin, but ADH does not. ALH and C-LCIS can be safely observed if the core biopsy diagnosis is concordant with imaging features (ie, radiographic-pathologic concordance is established). Provided radiologic-pathologic concordance is confirmed, diagnostic excision is generally not indicated after a diagnosis of FEA alone. Conclusions and Relevance These guidelines provide evidence-informed, consensus-based recommendations for the management of atypical lesions of the breast, including ADH, ALH, FEA, C-LCIS, P-LCIS, and F-LCIS. Practicing clinicians who treat patients with atypical breast lesions or LCIS should consider integrating these guidelines into clinical management.

Abstract Purpose Validate the semiquantitative (SQ)-MRI score for chronic pancreatitis (CP) diagnosis in an independent, multicenter cohort. Methods We analyzed MRIs performed at baseline in 337 participants with acute (AP) or recurrent AP (RAP) and 67 with non-calcific chronic pancreatitis (NCCP) enrolled in the PROCEED study from 6/2017 to 3/2023. MRIs were performed at multiple clinical centers using site-specific clinical protocols and a variety of MRI vendors to evaluate the SQ-MRI score in a real-world setting. The SQ-MRI score was calculated using the T1 signal intensity ratio of the pancreas to the spleen (T1 score), arteriovenous enhancement ratio (AVR), and pancreatic body diameter (PBD). We adjusted for confounding by participant characteristics via propensity score weighting. Results Median AVR was higher in AP/RAP (1.18, IQR: 0.97–1.44) than in the NCCP group (1.03, IQR: 0.78–1.22, p = 0.007). Pancreatic body diameters were larger in AP/RAP than in the NCCP group − 7–14 mm (10% vs 25%), 14–20 mm (40% vs 54%), and > 20 mm (50% vs 21%), respectively ( p < 0.01). Median T1 score was higher in AP/RAP (1.18, IQR: 0.96–1.40) than in the NCCP group (1.04, IQR: 0.86–1.32, p = 0.10). Median SQ-MRI score in the AP/RAP group was significantly lower, 1.91 (IQR: 0.97, 2.95), than in the NCCP group, 2.74 (IQR: 2.04–4.03) ( p < 0.001). The propensity score-adjusted AUC for SQ-MRI to distinguish AP/RAP from NCCP was 0.64, which was higher than for individual parameters. Conclusion We have validated the SQ-MRI score in a multicenter cohort using an independent, real-world MRI dataset.

Polycythemia vera is characterized by erythrocytosis and increased risk of thrombosis. Sapablursen is an antisense oligonucleotide that suppresses transmembrane serine protease 6 (TMPRSS6), increases hepcidin production, and reduces iron availability for erythropoiesis. IMPRSSION; an ongoing phase 2a, randomized, open-label study includes patients meeting 2016 WHO criteria for polycythemia vera, requiring ≥3 phlebotomies within 6 months of screening and ≥1 phlebotomy within the last 12 weeks. Cohort A (120 or 80 mg) and Cohort B (40 mg) received sapablursen subcutaneously once every 4 weeks (Q4W). The primary efficacy endpoint was the reduction in phlebotomy frequency from baseline to weeks 17-37 in patients who received ≥1 dose. Forty-nine patients received ≥1 sapablursen dose (median age 61 years; 82% male). The baseline mean±SD weekly phlebotomy rate was 0.15±0.07 in Cohort A; 0.17±0.07 in Cohort B and was reduced by -0.10 (95%CI, -0.13, -0.07; n=32;p&lt;0.0001) in Cohort A; -0.10 (95%CI, -0.14, -0.06; n=17;p=0.0001) in Cohort B. Sapablursen reduced the median (IQR) number of phlebotomies from 5.0 (3.0-6.0,Cohort A; 3.5-6.5,Cohort B) at baseline (26-weeks) to 0 (0-1.0) in the efficacy evaluation window (20-weeks) in Cohort A and 1.5 (0-2.5) in Cohort B. Most adverse events were mild or moderate; anemia and fatigue were most common. The mean change in MPN-SAF-TSS at week 37 was -6.21 points (95%CI: -10.56, -1.85, p=0.0052) in Cohort A; -2.71 points in Cohort B (95% CI: -8.33, 2.91, p=0.34). Sapablursen reduced phlebotomy need, improved symptoms, and was safe and well-tolerated in patients with polycythemia vera. (Funded by Ionis Pharmaceuticals; ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05143957)

The NCCN Guidelines for Survivorship offer guidance for health care providers who care for survivors of adult-onset cancer. These guidelines include screening, evaluation, and treatment recommendations for common physical and psychosocial problems resulting from cancer and its treatment and provide a framework for care coordination. They also present guidance for helping cancer survivors to enhance their wellness and maintain a healthy lifestyle. This article summarizes the panel’s current recommendations and recent updates regarding anxiety, depression, distress, and trauma in cancer survivors.

Mesothelioma is a rare cancer that originates from the mesothelial surfaces of certain sites within the body. Pleural mesothelioma is the most common type and represents approximately 85% of mesotheliomas. The NCCN Guidelines for Mesothelioma: Pleural provide recommendations for evaluation and treatment in patients with pleural mesothelioma. The NCCN Guidelines will continue to be updated annually based on available clinical evidence and panel consensus.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Medical management options for nontraumatic subdural hematoma (SDH) remain limited, with only atorvastatin demonstrating benefit in a single phase 2 randomized clinical trial and mixed evidence for dexamethasone. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) may benefit SDH outcomes. The objective of this study was to evaluate the association between GLP-1 RA use and rescue surgery rates and mortality in patients with medically managed nontraumatic SDH. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the TriNetX database from 2016 to 2025, including adults with SDH who were managed conservatively without surgical evacuation or middle meningeal artery embolization. Patients prescribed GLP-1 RAs were compared with nonusers. After propensity matching, rescue surgical evacuation, all-cause mortality at 1 year, and GLP-1 RA–associated adverse events were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 134 901 patients with conservatively managed nontraumatic SDH were identified, of whom 1470 (1.1%) were GLP-1 RA users. After propensity score matching, 2922 patients remained, with 1461 in each group. At 1 year, GLP-1 RA users experienced significantly lower rates of rescue surgery (2.23% vs 3.51%; P = .046), culminating in an overall 38% reduction in relative hazard. All-cause mortality was also significantly lower for GLP-1 RA users at 1 year (16.1% vs 23.7%, P < .001), reflecting a 33% reduction in hazards. GLP-1 RA users did not experience different rates of adverse events, such as pancreatitis, gallbladder disease, or ileus/bowel obstruction (all P > .05). CONCLUSION: Among patients with medically managed nontraumatic SDH, GLP-1 RA use was associated with significantly lower rates of rescue surgery and all-cause mortality without significantly increased risk of common GLP-1 RA–related complications.

Breast biopsy markers have evolved from simple metallic devices to sophisticated multimaterial tools that have become essential for breast cancer care, demonstrating their clinical benefits in surgical planning, radiation targeting, and cost reduction.

ABSTRACT Background Post‐pancreatectomy exocrine insufficiency is common after resection for pancreatic cancer and requires pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy (PERT). We sought to determine the out‐of‐pocket cost of PERT and the association between PERT and survival. Methods The SEER‐linked Medicare database was queried for patients with pancreatic cancer who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) or distal pancreatectomy (DP) from 2010 to 2019. Cumulative out‐of‐pocket costs were calculated and stratified by procedure and radiation. Results 11,854 Medicare beneficiaries with resected pancreatic cancer were identified, 4,653 (39%) required PERT and 7,201 (61%) did not. Median age was 73.0, 50.6% were female and 83.6% White. 25.9% underwent DP and 74.1% underwent PD; 7% received neoadjuvant radiation while 23.5% received adjuvant radiation. Logistic regression demonstrated that female sex (OR 1.25, 95% CI 1.16‐1.35, p < 0.001), neoadjuvant radiation (OR 1.93, 95% CI 1.67‐2.24, p < 0.001), and PD (OR 2.45, 95% CI 2.23‐2.7, p < 0.001) were risk factors for requiring PERT. Patients without subsidies who underwent DP paid a cumulative $4,736 out‐of‐pocket for PERT after 5 years, those who underwent PD paid $5,601 out‐of‐pocket. Conclusions Nearly 40% of Medicare beneficiaries took PERT after resection for pancreatic cancer and paid thousands in out‐of‐pocket costs. While a conservative estimate, these findings highlight the importance of addressing this financial burden to patients.

Abstract: Background Artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted colonoscopy reduces costs in colorectal cancer screening, but its incremental value relative to non-AI resect-and-discard (RD) strategies for diminutive polyps (≤ 5 mm) remain unclear. We aimed to compare the clinical, economic, and environmental outcomes of AI-assisted and non-AI RD strategies with standard of care (SoC). Methods In our Markov model simulating 6 million individuals aged ≥45 years undergoing screening colonoscopy, 4 strategies were evaluated: SoC, non-AI RD, CADe-assisted RD (CADe-RD), and CADe+CADx-assisted RD (CADe+CADx-RD). The primary outcome was total quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), with secondary outcomes including cost and carbon dioxide (CO₂) emissions. Results Non-AI RD achieved the lowest total cost ($36.6B) and carbon emissions (0.90 million kg CO₂), while yielding the highest QALYs (51.37 million), although differences in QALYs across strategies were small (<0.01%). CADe-RD and CADe+CADx-RD remained cost-saving relative to SoC ($36.9B and $37.4B vs $37.8B, respectively) but were associated with higher costs than non-AI RD. CADe modestly increased adenoma detection without improving QALYs, while the addition of CADx increased costs and emissions and resulted in slightly lower QALYs. Sensitivity analysis showed that CADe+CADx-RD matched or exceeded CADe-RD QALYs only within a limited region of high diagnostic performance. At currently reported CADx performance levels, CADe+CADx-RD yielded lower QALYs and higher costs than CADe-RD. CADe+CADx-RD achieved non-inferiority in QALYs relative to CADe-RD only within a limited region of high diagnostic performance. Conclusions In our non-deterministic model, non-AI RD provided the optimal balance of clinical benefit, cost savings, and lowest environmental impact.