Citations

Abstract Cancer cells can resist the effects of DNA-damaging therapeutic agents via utilization of DNA repair pathways, suggesting that DNA repair capacity (DRC) measurements in cancer cells could be used to identify patients most likely to respond to treatment. However, the limitations of available technologies have so far precluded adoption of this approach in the clinic. We recently developed fluorescence-based multiplexed host cell reactivation (FM-HCR) assays to measure DRC in multiple pathways. Here we apply a mathematical model that uses DRC in multiple pathways to predict cellular resistance to killing by DNA-damaging agents. This model, developed using FM-HCR and drug sensitivity measurements in 24 human lymphoblastoid cell lines, was applied to a panel of 12 patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models of glioblastoma to predict glioblastoma response to treatment with the chemotherapeutic DNA-damaging agent temozolomide. This work showed that, in addition to changes in O6-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) activity, small changes in mismatch repair (MMR), nucleotide excision repair (NER), and homologous recombination (HR) capacity contributed to acquired temozolomide resistance in PDX models and led to reduced relative survival prolongation following temozolomide treatment of orthotopic mouse models in vivo. Our data indicate that measuring the combined status of MMR, HR, NER, and MGMT provided a more robust prediction of temozolomide resistance than assessments of MGMT activity alone. Cancer Res; 77(1); 198–206. ©2016 AACR.

AbstractBackgroundGlioblastoma (GBM) exhibits profound intratumoral genetic heterogeneity. Each tumor comprises multiple genetically distinct clonal populations with different therapeutic sensitivities. This has implications for targeted therapy and genetically informed paradigms. Contrast-enhanced (CE)-MRI and conventional sampling techniques have failed to resolve this heterogeneity, particularly for nonenhancing tumor populations. This study explores the feasibility of using multiparametric MRI and texture analysis to characterize regional genetic heterogeneity throughout MRI-enhancing and nonenhancing tumor segments.MethodsWe collected multiple image-guided biopsies from primary GBM patients throughout regions of enhancement (ENH) and nonenhancing parenchyma (so called brain-around-tumor, [BAT]). For each biopsy, we analyzed DNA copy number variants for core GBM driver genes reported by The Cancer Genome Atlas. We co-registered biopsy locations with MRI and texture maps to correlate regional genetic status with spatially matched imaging measurements. We also built multivariate predictive decision-tree models for each GBM driver gene and validated accuracies using leave-one-out-cross-validation (LOOCV).ResultsWe collected 48 biopsies (13 tumors) and identified significant imaging correlations (univariate analysis) for 6 driver genes: EGFR, PDGFRA, PTEN, CDKN2A, RB1, and TP53. Predictive model accuracies (on LOOCV) varied by driver gene of interest. Highest accuracies were observed for PDGFRA (77.1%), EGFR (75%), CDKN2A (87.5%), and RB1 (87.5%), while lowest accuracy was observed in TP53 (37.5%). Models for 4 driver genes (EGFR, RB1, CDKN2A, and PTEN) showed higher accuracy in BAT samples (n = 16) compared with those from ENH segments (n = 32).ConclusionMRI and texture analysis can help characterize regional genetic heterogeneity, which offers potential diagnostic value under the paradigm of individualized oncology.

Abstract Microtubule-targeting agents (MTA) have been employed in the treatment of many cancers for decades. BAL101553 is a highly soluble prodrug of BAL27862, a novel, small molecule, microtubule-depolymerizing agent that induces tumor cell death by activating the ‘spindle assembly checkpoint’. Given intravenously or orally, the drug penetrates the brain and has anti-cancer activity in diverse tumor models refractory to standard MTA or radiotherapy (RT). In this study, BAL101553 was evaluated in orthotopic xenografts from 16 GBM PDX models; 7 of 16 lines demonstrated significant (p<0.01) increases in median survival with BAL101553 versus placebo (range in median survival extension 24-87%). The combination of BAL101553 with conventional therapies for GBM (RT and temozolomide (TMZ) was then evaluated in select lines. In the MGMT methylated GBM12 line, combination of RT with TMZ increased survival compared to placebo (median survival 80 days vs. 23 days, respectively; p<0.001). Extended BAL101553 monotherapy provided a short but significant extension in survival (median survival 31 days, p<0.001), while extended BAL101553 dosing during and after RT/TMZ (median survival 85 days) did not extend survival relative to RT/TMZ alone (p = 0.56). In contrast, in the MGMT unmethylated GBM6 line, combination of RT and extended BAL101553 increased survival (median 90 days, p<0.001) relative to either treatment alone (median survival BAL101553 63 days; RT 69 days) or placebo (46 days). Additionally, the combination of BAL101553 with TMZ (median survival 70 days) was more effective than TMZ alone (median survival 60 days; p = 0.009). Consistent with the unmethylated MGMT status, the TMZ/RT combination (median survival 66 days) was similar to RT alone (p = 0.62), but the combination of extended BAL101553 with RT/TMZ (median survival 101 days; p<0.001 compared to other combination groups) was significantly more effective. To further evaluate whether BAL101553 is a true radiosensitizer, a second GBM6 study was performed. Also here, combination of RT (20Gy, 2wks) with extended BAL101553 dosing (median survival 66 days) significantly extended survival compared to RT alone (median survival 54 days; p = 002). Interestingly, when BAL101553 dosing was limited to 2 weeks with RT, there was no increase in median survival (58 days; p = 0.16). To evaluate effects on tumor repopulation during RT, the efficacy of an extended RT schedule (36 Gy, 6 wks) with or without 6 weeks of BAL101553 was evaluated. In this case, BAL101553 given during the RT schedule (median survival 78 days) extended median survival as compared to RT alone (61 days; p<0.001). Collectively, these data demonstrate that BAL101553 has broad single agent activity across a panel of GBM PDX models and suggests that combination with RT/TMZ therapy may provide additional benefits for survival extension. Citation Format: Ann C. Mladek, Jenny L. Pokorny, Heidi Lane, Felix Bachmann, Mark A. Schroeder, Katrina K. Bakken, Brett L. Carlson, Paul A. Decker, Jeanette E. Eckel-Passow, Jann N. Sarkaria. The novel tubulin-binding ‘tumor checkpoint controller’ BAL101553 has anti-cancer activity alone and in combination treatments across a panel of GBM patient-derived xenografts. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 107th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2016 Apr 16-20; New Orleans, LA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(14 Suppl):Abstract nr 4781.

Abstract BACKGROUND: Talazoparib (TAL) is a potent poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor that robustly enhances in vitro sensitivity to temozolomide (TMZ) in several tumor models. We assessed the in vitro and in vivo efficacy of TAL combined with TMZ in glioblastoma (GBM) models. METHODS: Established glioma cell lines (T98G, U251) and the GBM12 patient derived xenograft (PDX) line were treated in vitro with TAL (1-10 nM) ± TMZ (2-300 μM). Antitumor efficacy was assessed with CyQUANT, clonogenic and primary neurosphere assays; cell cycle analysis with flow cytometry; DNA damage signaling with phospho-specific western blots for pKap1, pChk1, pChk2 and fluorescent immunocytochemistry for γH2AX and replication protein A foci. Brain and plasma concentrations of TAL in wild-type (WT), Mdr1a/b(-/-), Bcrp(-/-) and Mdr1a/b(-/-)Bcrp(-/-) knockout (KO) mice were assessed with LC-MS/MS. The tolerability of TAL (0.05 - 0.30 mg/kg/day orally, divided twice daily (div. bid)) and TMZ (5-50 mg/kg/day orally) was tested in athymic nude mice. Subsequently, in vivo combination TAL/TMZ efficacy was assessed with survival analyses in intracranial and flank GBM12 PDX models. RESULTS: TAL 1-3 nM sensitizes the TMZ resistant T98G glioma cell line to TMZ at high TMZ concentrations (30-300 μM) and is associated with G2 cell cycle arrest and enhanced DNA damage signaling. TAL 1-3 nM also enhances the cytotoxic efficacy of lower concentrations of TMZ (10-30 μM) in the TMZ sensitive U251 cell line. At least 3 nM TAL is required to enhance the in vitro efficacy of low TMZ concentrations (2-10 μM) in the TMZ sensitive GBM12 PDX line. PK studies in non-tumor bearing WT FVB mice treated with a single dose of TAL 0.15 mg/kg revealed mean brain and plasma concentrations of 0.49 ng/g (1.3 nM) and 25.5 ng/ml (67.1 nM) respectively at 2 hours. The mean brain/plasma ratio at 2 hours was unchanged in Bcrp(-/-) KO mice compared to WT mice (1.2% vs. 2.0%), but was significantly increased in Mdr1a/b(-/-) KO mice (22.8%) and Mdr1a/b(-/-)Bcrp(-/-) KO mice (23.9%). Standard doses of TMZ (50 mg/kg/day, days 1-5) combined with low doses of TAL (0.05 mg/kg/day, div. bid) were toxic in nude mice. Higher doses of TAL (0.30 mg/kg/day, div. bid) required substantial TMZ dose reductions (5 mg/kg/day, days 1-5) for tolerability. The addition of TAL (0.30 mg/kg/day, div. bid) to low-dose TMZ (5 mg/kg/day) prolonged tumor stasis in flank GBM12 xenografts (median time to endpoint 76 vs. 50 days, p = 0.005). However this regimen was ineffective in intracranial GBM12 xenografts (median survival 37 vs. 30 days, p = 0.93). CONCLUSIONS: TAL is a potent PARP inhibitor that enhances the efficacy of TMZ in both in vitro GBM models and flank GBM12 PDX models, but not in the corresponding GBM12 intracranial xenografts. This lack of intracranial efficacy is associated with limited brain distribution due to active efflux mediated by Mdr1 at the blood-brain barrier. Citation Format: Sani H. Kizilbash, Kenneth Chang, Shiv K. Gupta, Ryo Kawashima, Karen Parrish, Ann C. Mladek, Brett L. Carlson, Katrina K. Bakken, Mark A. Schroeder, Gaspar J. Kitange, Paul A. Decker, Yuqiao Shen, William F. Elmquist, Jann N. Sarkaria. Talazoparib enhances low-dose temozolomide efficacy in flank glioblastoma models, but intracranial efficacy is constrained by limited brain distribution. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 107th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2016 Apr 16-20; New Orleans, LA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(14 Suppl):Abstract nr 340.

Abstract Drug resistance and frequent tumor relapses are the major obstacles in glioblastoma therapy, and recurrent tumors are practically incurable. We previously reported that insulin receptor substrate 1 (IRS-1), which is a typical signaling molecule for insulin and insulin-like growth factor 1 receptors, can translocate to nucleus, and that nuclear IRS-1 (nIRS-1) was found in different tumor cells, including glioblastomas. To unravel its function, we employed glioblastoma cell culture, animal models, and clinical samples. Using confocal imaging, molecular cloning, subcellular fractionation, mass spectrometry, gene expression analysis, and different approaches to verify protein-protein interactions, we demonstrate for the first time that nIRS-1 can form complex nuclear structures in a restricted number of cancer cells in glioblastoma biopsies and in intracranial glioblastoma xenografts. We also demonstrated the formation of highly organized ring-like structures in several cell lines, following ectopic expression of IRS-1 cloned in frame with nuclear localization signal (NLS-IRS-1). In these nuclear structures IRS-1 localizes at the periphery, and the core of the structure harbors a key autophagy protein, LC3; however, other autophagy proteins or biological membranes were not detected. In living cells expressing NLS-IRS-1-GFP fusion protein, IRS-1/LC3 structures are highly dynamic. They rapidly exchange IRS-1 molecules with nucleoplasm and interact with other nuclear complexes including BMI1-positive Polycomb bodies, PML bodies and Cajal bodies. Importantly, clones and mixed populations of cells expressing the NLS-IRS-1 and capable of forming the IRS-1/LC3 ring-like structures undergo extensive remodeling of gene expression, which suggests a transition to stem-like phenotype and associated resistance to several different anticancer drugs, including temozolomide. This is the first demonstration of IRS-1/LC3 nuclear complexes, which are highly dynamic and may play a role in epigenetic remodeling of glioblastoma cells towards stemness. Further studies are required to determine detailed molecular composition and to explain how these new nuclear structures function. Citation Format: Adam Lassak, Dorota Wyczechowska, Anna Wilk, Adriana Zapata, Mathew Dean, Luis DelValle, Jann N. Sarkaria, Augusto Ochoas, Francesca Peruzzi, Krzysztof Reiss. IRS-1/LC3 nuclear structures and glioblastoma drug resistance. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 107th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2016 Apr 16-20; New Orleans, LA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(14 Suppl):Abstract nr 2520.

OBJECTIVE Improvement in treatment outcome for patients with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) requires a multifaceted approach due to dysregulation of numerous signaling pathways. The murine double minute 2 (MDM2) protein may fulfill this requirement because it is involved in the regulation of growth, survival, and invasion. The objective of this study was to investigate the impact of modulating MDM2 function in combination with front-line temozolomide (TMZ) therapy in GBM. METHODS The combination of TMZ with the MDM2 protein–protein interaction inhibitor nutlin3a was evaluated for effects on cell growth, p53 pathway activation, expression of DNA repair proteins, and invasive properties. In vivo efficacy was assessed in xenograft models of human GBM. RESULTS In combination, TMZ/nutlin3a was additive to synergistic in decreasing growth of wild-type p53 GBM cells. Pharmacodynamic studies demonstrated that inhibition of cell growth following exposure to TMZ/nutlin3a correlated with: 1) activation of the p53 pathway, 2) downregulation of DNA repair proteins, 3) persistence of DNA damage, and 4) decreased invasion. Pharmacokinetic studies indicated that nutlin3a was detected in human intracranial tumor xenografts. To assess therapeutic potential, efficacy studies were conducted in a xenograft model of intracranial GBM by using GBM cells derived from a recurrent wild-type p53 GBM that is highly TMZ resistant (GBM10). Three 5-day cycles of TMZ/nutlin3a resulted in a significant increase in the survival of mice with GBM10 intracranial tumors compared with single-agent therapy. CONCLUSIONS Modulation of MDM2/p53-associated signaling pathways is a novel approach for decreasing TMZ resistance in GBM. To the authors' knowledge, this is the first study in a humanized intracranial patient-derived xenograft model to demonstrate the efficacy of combining front-line TMZ therapy and an inhibitor of MDM2 protein–protein interactions.

Abstract Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common malignant primary brain cancer. With a median survival of about a year, new approaches to treating this disease are necessary. To identify signaling molecules regulating GBM progression in a genetically engineered murine model of proneural GBM, we quantified phosphotyrosine-mediated signaling using mass spectrometry. Oncogenic signals, including phosphorylated ERK MAPK, PI3K, and PDGFR, were found to be increased in the murine tumors relative to brain. Phosphorylation of CDK1 pY15, associated with the G2 arrest checkpoint, was identified as the most differentially phosphorylated site, with a 14-fold increase in phosphorylation in the tumors. To assess the role of this checkpoint as a potential therapeutic target, syngeneic primary cell lines derived from these tumors were treated with MK-1775, an inhibitor of Wee1, the kinase responsible for CDK1 Y15 phosphorylation. MK-1775 treatment led to mitotic catastrophe, as defined by increased DNA damage and cell death by apoptosis. To assess the extensibility of targeting Wee1/CDK1 in GBM, patient-derived xenograft (PDX) cell lines were also treated with MK-1775. Although the response was more heterogeneous, on-target Wee1 inhibition led to decreased CDK1 Y15 phosphorylation and increased DNA damage and apoptosis in each line. These results were also validated in vivo, where single-agent MK-1775 demonstrated an antitumor effect on a flank PDX tumor model, increasing mouse survival by 1.74-fold. This study highlights the ability of unbiased quantitative phosphoproteomics to reveal therapeutic targets in tumor models, and the potential for Wee1 inhibition as a treatment approach in preclinical models of GBM. Mol Cancer Ther; 15(6); 1332–43. ©2016 AACR.

Abstract Glioblastoma (GB) is the highest grade and most common form of primary adult brain tumors. Despite surgical removal followed by concomitant radiation and chemotherapy with the alkylating agent temozolomide, GB tumors develop treatment resistance and ultimately recur. Impaired response to treatment occurs rapidly, conferring a median survival of just fifteen months. Thus, it is necessary to identify the genetic and signaling mechanisms that promote tumor resistance to develop targeted therapies to combat this refractory disease. Previous observations indicated that SGEF (ARHGEF26), a RhoG-specific guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF), is overexpressed in GB tumors and plays a role in promoting TWEAK-Fn14–mediated glioma invasion. Here, further investigation revealed an important role for SGEF in glioma cell survival. SGEF expression is upregulated by TWEAK-Fn14 signaling via NF-κB activity while shRNA-mediated reduction of SGEF expression sensitizes glioma cells to temozolomide-induced apoptosis and suppresses colony formation following temozolomide treatment. Nuclear SGEF is activated following temozolomide exposure and complexes with the DNA damage repair (DDR) protein BRCA1. Moreover, BRCA1 phosphorylation in response to temozolomide treatment is hindered by SGEF knockdown. The role of SGEF in promoting chemotherapeutic resistance highlights a heretofore unappreciated driver, and suggests its candidacy for development of novel targeted therapeutics for temozolomide-refractory, invasive GB cells. Implication: SGEF, as a dual process modulator of cell survival and invasion, represents a novel target for treatment refractory glioblastoma. Mol Cancer Res; 14(3); 302–12. ©2016 AACR.

Abstract Purpose: Aberrant activation of EGFR is a hallmark of glioblastoma. However, EGFR inhibitors exhibit at best modest efficacy in glioblastoma. This is in sharp contrast with the observations in EGFR-mutant lung cancer. We examined whether activation of functionally redundant receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) conferred resistance to EGFR inhibitors in glioblastoma. Experimental Design: We collected a panel of patient-derived glioblastoma xenograft (PDX) lines that maintained expression of wild-type or mutant EGFR in serial xenotransplantation and tissue cultures. Using this physiologically relevant platform, we tested the abilities of several RTK ligands to protect glioblastoma cells against an EGFR inhibitor, gefitinib. Based on the screening results, we further developed a combination therapy cotargeting EGFR and insulin receptor (InsR)/insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor (IGF1R). Results: Insulin and IGF1 induced significant protection against gefitinib in the majority of EGFR-dependent PDX lines with one exception that did not express InsR or IGF1R. Blockade of the InsR/IGF1R pathway synergistically improved sensitivity to gefitinib or dacomitinib. Gefitinib alone effectively attenuated EGFR activities and the downstream MEK/ERK pathway. However, repression of AKT and induction of apoptosis required concurrent inhibition of both EGFR and InsR/IGF1R. A combination of gefitinib and OSI-906, a dual InsR/IGF1R inhibitor, was more effective than either agent alone to treat subcutaneous glioblastoma xenograft tumors. Conclusions: Our results suggest that activation of the InsR/IGF1R pathway confers resistance to EGFR inhibitors in EGFR-dependent glioblastoma through AKT regulation. Concurrent blockade of these two pathways holds promise to treat EGFR-dependent glioblastoma. Clin Cancer Res; 22(7); 1767–76. ©2015 AACR.

Abstract PARP inhibition can enhance the efficacy of temozolomide and prolong survival in orthotopic glioblastoma (GBM) xenografts. The aim of this study was to evaluate the combination of the PARP inhibitor rucaparib with temozolomide and to correlate pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies with efficacy in patient-derived GBM xenograft models. The combination of rucaparib with temozolomide was highly effective in vitro in short-term explant cultures derived from GBM12, and, similarly, the combination of rucaparib and temozolomide (dosed for 5 days every 28 days for 3 cycles) significantly prolonged the time to tumor regrowth by 40% in heterotopic xenografts. In contrast, the addition of rucaparib had no impact on the efficacy of temozolomide in GBM12 or GBM39 orthotopic models. Using Madin-Darby canine kidney (MDCK) II cells stably expressing murine BCRP1 or human MDR1, cell accumulation studies demonstrated that rucaparib is transported by both transporters. Consistent with the influence of these efflux pumps on central nervous system drug distribution, Mdr1a/b−/−Bcrp1−/− knockout mice had a significantly higher brain to plasma ratio for rucaparib (1.61 ± 0.25) than wild-type mice (0.11 ± 0.08). A pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic evaluation after a single dose confirmed limited accumulation of rucaparib in the brain is associated with substantial residual PARP enzymatic activity. Similarly, matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometric imaging demonstrated significantly enhanced accumulation of drug in flank tumor compared with normal brain or orthotopic tumors. Collectively, these results suggest that limited drug delivery into brain tumors may significantly limit the efficacy of rucaparib combined with temozolomide in GBM. Mol Cancer Ther; 14(12); 2735–43. ©2015 AACR.