Citations

Abstract Abstract 2486 In patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL), deletion of 17p13 (17p-) resulting in loss of one allele of TP53 and 11q22 (11q-) resulting in loss of one allele of ATM predicts a significantly poorer prognosis. These lesions are nearly always monoallelic in patients with CLL and their consequences are considerably influenced by the integrity of the remaining allele. A dysfunctional mutation in the remaining allele, resulting in more aggressive disease, ultimately occurs in most patients with 17p- (> 80%) but fewer patients with 11q- (30%). Because ATM and TP53 are integral components of the p53 pathway, we hypothesize that patients with clonal 17p- and 11q- in the same CLL cell would have a worse prognosis than patients with only one of these deletions. To test this hypothesis, we compared the clinical outcomes (overall survival (OS) and time to treatment (TTT)) of patients with 17p- and 11q- in the same cell to patients with either 17p- or 11q- or neither defect. Methods: We used the Mayo Clinic CLL Database and the Cytogenetics laboratory database to identify all CLL patients seen in the Division of Hematology from 1/1/1995-3/29/2012 who had FISH analysis. Data was extracted on demographics, date of first (sentinel) occurrence of 11q- and 17p-, treatment, and vital status. FISH studies were performed on uncultured blood or bone marrow by standard methods using the Mayo Clinic CLL FISH panel of centromere specific control probes and probes for 6q (MYB), 11q (ATM), 13q14, and 17p (TP53) deletions, trisomy 12 and IGH. Patients with both 11q- and 17p- were further tested with the Abbott Molecular (Des Plaines, IL) ATM/TP53 combination probe set, to determine if the 11q and 17p deletions were present in the same cells. Patients were grouped into 4 cohorts: 1) clonal 17p- and 11q-; 2) 17p- only; 3) 11q- only; and 4) neither 17p- nor 11q-. OS and TTT were calculated and Kaplan-Meier curves were drawn from sentinel FISH date until their last known alive date or death date for OS and until treatment or last known untreated date for TTT. We censored all data on 3/29/2012 and analyzed using log-rank tests from date of sentinel FISH. Sanger sequencing of exons 4–9 of TP53 was done in samples from 15 patients with clonal 17p- and 11q- with an available sample collected within 1 year of the sentinel FISH test and without treatment in that interval. All mutations were confirmed by a repeat assay and analyzed for their predicted effect using the UMD p53 database. Results: We studied 2234 CLL patients with a median follow-up of 4.8 years (range 0 – 29.6 years). Twenty (1%) patients had clonal 17p- and 11q-, 159 (7%) had 17p-, 251 (11%) had 11q-, and 1804 (81%) had neither 17p- nor 11q-. Median OS from sentinel FISH study (Figure 1) was significantly shorter in the clonal 17p- and 11q- group (1.9 years), 17p- group (3.2 y), and 11q- group (4.7 y) compared to the patients with neither 17p- nor 11q- (9.2 y) (p < 0.0001). OS was significantly shorter in the patients with clonal 17p- and 11q- cells vs those with 17p- (p=0.048). TTT was also significantly different among the 4 groups (p<0.0001) with median time to treatment of 0.07 y in the clonal 17p- and 11q-, 0.2 y in 17p-, 0.7 y in 11q-, and 5.6 y in the neither 17p- nor 11q- group. TP53 analysis performed in samples from 15 patients with clonal 17p- and 11q- showed that 10 patients had mutations in the remaining TP3 allele predicted to be deleterious to normal p53 protein function. Median OS was 2.1 years for those with TP53 mutations and 0.9 years for those without mutations (p = 0.03) and median TTT was 0.25 years for those with TP53 mutations and 0.05 years for those without mutations (p = 0.049). Conclusion: “Double hit” clonal deletions of 17p and 11q occurred in 1% of this large cohort of CLL patients and were associated with a significantly poorer prognosis. We recommend that testing for this “double hit” phenomenon, by use of an ATM/TP53 combination probe set, should thus be performed in all patients with 17p- and 11q- on FISH analysis because these patients have a poorer prognosis than those with either 17p- or 11q- and could be candidates for novel therapies. The finding that dysfunctional TP53 mutations in the remaining allele did not worsen prognosis in patients with clonal 17p- and 11q- suggests that monoallelic deletion of both ATM and TP53 in a clone of CLL cells is sufficient to disable p53 pathway function in these patients. Future study of clonal 17p- and 11q- CLL could thus be informative in this regard. Disclosures: Kay: Celgene: Research Funding. Shanafelt:Genentech: Research Funding; Glaxo-Smith-Kline: Research Funding; Cephalon: Research Funding; Hospira: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Polyphenon E International: Research Funding. Zent:Biothera: Research Funding; Genzyme: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Research Funding.

Abstract Introduction: Ibrutinib has shown remarkable safety and efficacy in CLL. Due to CYP3A4 (3A4) metabolism, the concurrent use of 3A4 inhibitors/inducers with ibrutinib should be avoided. Ibrutinib is also associated with bleeding complications, in part due to effects on collagen-mediated platelet aggregation, thus caution is advised with the simultaneous use of anticoagulant (AC) and antiplatelet agents. It is unknown what proportion of CLL patients starting ibrutinib therapy in routine practice are on these medications. We conducted a retrospective study to evaluate these aspects in a large cohort of CLL pts treated with ibrutinib outside the context of clinical trials. Methods: Following IRB approval, consecutive CLL pts who initiated ibrutinib off-protocol at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN from November 2013 through July 2015 were evaluated. A medication review for drug-drug interactions was performed by a pharmacist on all pts. Baseline characteristics, concomitant medications, and toxicity were recorded. Time to toxicity and ibrutinib discontinuation were analyzed by Kaplan Meier and cumulative incidence methods accounting for competing risk of death, respectively. Results: Ninety-six CLL pts started ibrutinib. Median age was 66 years and 64 (67%) were male. Ibrutinib indications included: relapsed/refractory CLL (n=84), treatment-naïve CLL with del17p (n=8), and CLL with Richter's transformation (n=4). Approximately 80% had unmutated IGHV and 45% had del17p or del11q on FISH. Upon initial pharmacy consult prior to ibrutinib, the median number of concomitant medications was 9 (range, 1-31). Sixty (63%) pts were taking concurrent medications increasing their risk of ibrutinib toxicity and 4 (4%) pts were on drugs potentially reducing ibrutinib efficacy. At ibrutinib initiation, 16 (17%) pts were on concomitant 3A4 inhibitors. This included 9 (9%) on moderate 3A4 inhibitors (fluconazole, diltiazem, imatinib, cyclosporine) and 7 (7%) on strong 3A4 inhibitors (voriconazole, posaconazole, clarithromycin, itraconazole). In 4 pts, the 3A4 inhibitor was switched to another agent or discontinued to allow standard 420 mg daily dosing. Ibrutinib was initiated at 140 mg daily in 7 pts on moderate 3A4 inhibitors and at 140 mg every 48 hours in 5 pts on strong 3A4 inhibitors. Four (4%) pts were on strong 3A4 inducers (carbamazepine, rifampin, rifabutin) at the initiation of ibrutinib. The 3A4 inducer was discontinued prior to ibrutinib start in 3 pts, while the initial ibrutinib dose was decreased to 140 mg every 48 hours in the remaining patient (also on 2 strong 3A4 inhibitors). During the course of ibrutinib, an additional 8 (8%) pts were started on 3A4 inhibitors/inducers which necessitated dose modifications. Upon commencing ibrutinib, 9 (9%) pts were on concomitant AC (6 warfarin, 3 enoxaparin). Due to significant bleeding risk, warfarin was switched to enoxaparin in 2 pts, to aspirin (ASA) in 1 and warfarin was discontinued in 1. In 2 pts, an alternative AC could not be used so ibrutinib was begun at 140 mg daily and titrated upward. Twenty-nine (30%) pts were on ASA (3 [3%] also on clopidogrel) at ibrutinib initiation. Nineteen (20%) pts were on selective serotonin release inhibitors (SSRIs), and 9 (9%) were on NSAIDs. Thirteen (13%) pts were on fish oil and 24 (25%) were on herbal medications; all of which were discontinued prior to starting ibrutinib. Ten (10%) pts had clinically significant bleeding on ibrutinib including 4 (4%) requiring hospitalization (1 subdural hematoma). Of these 4 pts, 1 was on enoxaparin, 2 were on a SSRI and 1 a NSAID. Six pts had minor bleeding necessitating a dose reduction of ibrutinib to 140-280 mg daily. After 16 months follow-up, the risk of bleeding was 21% (95% CI: 1-37%, Figure). After a median follow-up of 7.6 months, 73 (76%) pts remain on ibrutinib. There was no difference in rates of discontinuation of ibrutinib between patients who were on 3A4 inhibitors/inducers versus those who were not. Conclusion: In the "real-world" setting, 2 out of 3 CLL patients commencing ibrutinib therapy is on a concomitant medication with a potentially clinically significant drug-drug interaction with ibrutinib. These findings have implications for the practicing hematologist who must maintain a high degree of vigilance when prescribing ibrutinib to CLL pts. We highly recommend a formal medication review by a clinical pharmacist in all patients initiating ibrutinib. Figure 1. Figure 1. Disclosures Ding: Merck: Research Funding. Kay:Hospira: Research Funding; Tolero Pharma: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Celgene Corporation: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Shanafelt:Glaxo-Smith_Kline: Research Funding; Pharmactckucs: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Cephalon: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Hospira: Research Funding; Polyphenon E Int'l: Research Funding.

Motexafin gadolinium (MGd, Xcytrin®) is a novel anti-cancer drug that selectively concentrates in cancer cells and disrupts redox dependent pathways by targeting oxidative stress related proteins such as thioredoxin reductase and metallothioneins. MGd has been shown to generate reactive oxygen species and induce apoptosis in tumor cells. We initiated a study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of MGd in two B-cell malignancies, relapsed/refractory LG and relapsed/refractory CLL or CLL/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL). MGd was given intravenously (IV) at 6mg/kg/day for 3 days q 2 weeks for LG and 5mg/kg/day for 10 days q 3 weeks for CLL/SLL. Ten patients (pts) with LG (2 grade 1, 5 grade 2, 1 grade 3 follicular, 2 marginal zone), 2 pts with CLL/SLL and 1 pt with CLL have been enrolled. Median age was 64.5 yrs (range 44–77), median prior treatment regimens was 3.5 (range 1–6) and median time from diagnosis to treatment was 52 mo. Many LG pts had failed prior aggressive treatment regimens including: CHOP (4), ICE (1), HyperCVAD(1), auto-bone marrow transplant (1); all failed rituxamab and 6 failed Zevalin. CLL/SLL and CLL pts had failed rituxamab (3), fludarabine (2), and R-CHOP (1). MGd related adverse events included skin and urine discoloration (6 and 4 pts), diarrhea, nausea, vesiculobullous rash, peripheral neuropathy (3 pts each). MGd related ≥gr 3 adverse events included skin rash (3 pts), fatigue, neuropathy, photosensitivity (1 pt each). Importantly, no MGd-related myelosuppression was observed. In 12 evaluable pts, there have been three PRs of 2+, 5+ and 8 months duration (2 follicular, 1 CLL). Two pts had SD (follicular, SLL) one of these had resolution of lymphoma related autoimmune hemolytic anemia. Responses occurred after ≤2 cycles of therapy and were seen in patients after extensive prior treatment (mean 4.3 prior regimens, range 3–7). MGd is a non-myelosuppressive drug with single agent activity in LG and CLL/SLL.

Abstract Abstract 3606 Background: Cytogenetic abnormalities are important prognostic indicators in CLL. At Mayo Clinic, CLL FISH analyses are derived from buffy coat samples not purified for lymphocytes. Scoring is therefore performed on consecutive qualifying nuclei regardless of cell size, shape or morphology. This scoring may not reflect the percent of abnormal nuclei of the affected cell type, but rather the entire population of cells present in the sample. We sought to determine whether the percent abnormal nuclei in only the affected cell type (e.g. lymphocytes) of patients with CLL differed from that of the general cell population. Scoring only B-lymphocytes could increase the sensitivity of the test in patients with low B-cell counts, either early in their disease or after treatment. Cell sorting techniques could be used to reach this goal but can be expensive, labor intensive and add to completion time. We propose a “Poor Man's Cell Sorting” technique based on cell morphology when stained with 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI). In CLL samples, both round and so called “lobed” cells are seen by DAPI staining but we hypothesize that the CLL B-cells typically present as perfectly round in shape (Fig. 1). Thus our hypothesis: if only the round cells are scored for a genetic defect, would this more accurately represent the malignant leukemic B-cell population and allow for enhanced disease status by FISH? Methods: After IRB approval, we identified 87 CLL patients (75% male; 25% female, mean age 62.4 y, range 43–89 y) in the Mayo Clinic CLL Database, who were seen at Mayo Clinic between March, 2002 - July, 2010. We selected patients known to have low level FISH abnormalities and who therefore should have a significant population of both lymphocytes and neutrophils. Selection criteria included <20×106 B-cells per microliter (by flow cytometry) of peripheral blood and ≤40% of interphase nuclei expressing a specific FISH abnormality. Although most of the 87 patients exhibited more than one FISH abnormality, we focused on only one FISH defect per patient for this study. The original specimen (slide or fixed cell pellet) was rescored for % abnormal nuclei among 100 consecutive round and 100 consecutive lobed (or multilobular) nuclei, using DAPI to identify nuclear architecture. These scores were compared to each other and to the original clinical FISH analysis (scored for 200 consecutive nuclei and not selected for nuclear morphology). Results: Among 87 cases, FISH signals were scored for 6q-(1), 11q-(9), +12(15), 13q-(58), 17p-(2) and 2 IGH rearrangements. In 86/87 cases, the abnormal lobed nuclei did not have FISH defects. One patient exhibited 35% +12 by clinical assay, 52% +12 in the round nuclei, and 11% by lobed nuclei. For all cases, the mean percentage of abnormal nuclei was greater in the round cells (46%) vs original scoring (23.6%). In 79/87 patients (91%), the % of abnormal nuclei was greater in the round cells vs original FISH (mean increase 24.3%; range 1.5–57%). One patient's score was the same in round cells vs original, and 7 patients exhibited fewer abnormal nuclei in the round cells vs original. For these 7 cases, the mean % abnormal nuclei was 5.6% for round nuclei vs 8.4% for original score (score differences ranged from 1 – 5.5%). Overall, by univariate regression analysis, round cells (p=0.0043) have a better correlation with % B-cells, ascertained by flow cytometry, than either the current clinical approach (p=0.0462) or the lobed-cell approach (p=0.4058). Discussion: In virtually all cases (99%), the abnormal FISH patterns were confined to the round nuclei, and the lobed nuclei were virtually always normal by FISH. For patients with <20×106 lymphocytes, selecting for round nuclei uniformly resulted in identification of a higher percentage of abnormal cells. Further studies, including comparison of our round nucleus approach to CLL FISH analysis to actual sorted B-lymphocyte cell selection and the association of this leukemic restricted estimation of abnormal FISH levels to clinical outcome are necessary. Given our findings, we believe that estimating FISH defects restricted to the leukemic B-cell population will become an important adjunct to cytogenetic analysis for patients with low lymphocyte counts, including those in clinical remission and those with minimal residual disease. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract Background: Over the last two decades several phenotypic, molecular, and chromosomal markers have been identified that are significantly associated with the prognosis of CLL patients. Therefore, clinicians managing CLL patients would benefit from a simplified prognostic index. Methods: We analyzed prospectively collected data from 337 Binet A CLL patients enrolled in Italian the O-CLL1-GISL protocol with the aim of developing scores capable of predicting treatment free survival (TFS). Factors independently associated with TFS were included in the prognostic indexes. To account for differences in the magnitude of the association between the individual independent factors and TFS, we assigned a weighted risk score to each factor based on ranges of their corresponding hazard ratios (HRs) (i.e., 1 point for HR 1.1-1.9; 2 points for HR 2.0-2.9, etc.). The total risk score was then calculated by the sum of the ratings of each factor on individual basis. Risk groups were identified combining risk categories with a non-statistically different TFS. Results: We developed two scores based on weighted multivariable models: the first included clinical and laboratory parameters [clinical score (c-score)], while the second was based on biological markers [biological score (b-score)] (Table 1). The c-score allowed to predict the TFS of patients through the combination of Rai stage, b2-microglobulin and absolute lymphocyte count (ALC), while the b-score predicted TFS by IGHV mutational status and CD38 expression. The c-score showed a C-statistic of 0.72, while the b-score was 0.67, although cases stratified according to the b-score showed a more specific mRNA/microRNA profile. When the two scores were forced in a multivariate analysis, both showed an independent predictive value on TFS with a similar HR, demonstrating their complementarity. Thus, we attempted to integrate the two scores performing a further multivariate analysis in which all parameters, significantly associated with TFS at univariate analysis, were tested (Table 1). ALC, Rai stage, b2-microglobulin together with IGHV mutational status, resulted independently associated with TFS. We constructed a weighted score [comprehensive score (co-score)], including all the above 4 variables, which allowed the identification of 3 different risk groups with significantly different TFS (Figure 1). The C-statistic of the g-score was 0.75, showing a better concordance than the other two scores. Moreover, its validity was externally validated in a series of 297 newly diagnosed Binet A CLL patients from the Mayo Clinic, USA. Conclusions: Using this multistep process and external validation, we developed a score with high discriminatory power and predictive significance on the individual patient level. Table 1. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional Hazards Models Variable Univariate analysis Multivariate analysis Clinical model Biological model Comprehensive model HR (95% CI) P HR (95% CI) P score HR (95% CI) P score HR (95% CI) P score Age (years) <60/>60 1.12 (0.73-1.74) 0.59 - - - - - - - - - Sex Male/Female 0.93 (0.6-1.44) 0.93 - - - - - - - - - Rai stage 0/I-II 2.30 (1.47-3.50) <0.0001 2.13 (1.24-3.03) 0.004 0/2 - - - 1.76 (1.11-2.78) 0.015 0/1 ALC (109/L) <10/>10 3.43 (1.99-5.92) <0.0001 2.91 (1.85-5.20) <0.0001 0/2 - - - 2.70 (1.54-4.72) 0.001 0/2 b-2 microglobulin normal/elevated 3.04 (1.96-4.70) <0.0001 2.78 (1.79-4.30) <0.0001 0/2 - - - 2.65 (1.66-4.21) <0.0001 0/2 LDH normal/elevated 1.25 (0.57-2.71) 0.57 - - - - - - - - - CD38 negative/positive 3.22 (2.06-5.02) <0.0001 - - - 2.11 (1.15-3.16) 0.02 0/2 1.40 (0.80-2.42) 0.24 - ZAP-70 negative/positive 2.34 (1.51-3.61) <0.0001 - - - 1.21 (0.70-2.16) 0.485 - 1.0 (0.98-1.01) 0.72 - IGHV mutated/unmutated 3.57 (2.32-5.50) <0.0001 - - - 2.10 (1.12-3.90) 0.019 0/2 2.39 (1.27-4.50) 0.007 0/2 FISH risk low+int/high 2.93 (1.46-5.90) 0.002 - - - 1.65 (0.76-3.34) 0.216 - 1.80 (0.84-3.88) 0.13 - Abbreviations: ALC: absolute lymphocyte count; CI: confidential interval; HR: hazard ratio. Figure 1. TFS according to comprehensive progression risk score. Figure 1. TFS according to comprehensive progression risk score. Disclosures Shanafelt: Cephalon: Research Funding; Glaxo-Smith-Kline: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Hospira: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Jannsen: Research Funding; Polyphenon E International: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding. Kay:Genentech: Research Funding; Celgene Corporation: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Hospira: Research Funding; Tolero Pharma: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding.

Abstract Abstract 54 B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is characterized by the progressive accumulation of CD5+ B-lymphocytes in the peripheral blood, lymphoid organs and bone marrow. Despite aggressive therapy, CLL is still incurable partly because of intrinsic defect in apoptosis induction. Deregulated expression of protein kinases by gene deletion, mutation, or amplification has been found to be important for tumor initiation and progression involving cancer cell proliferation, survival, motility, and invasiveness as well as tumor angiogenesis and chemotherapy resistance. Because of their critical functions in oncogenesis, protein kinases have been at the forefront of targeted cancer therapy development since the 1980s. A novel receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) Axl has been reported to be overexpressed in several types of human cancers including colon, prostatic, thyroid, breast, gastric, renal and lung. Indeed, our recent investigation (ASH 2009, Abstract #2368) identified Axl to be constitutively phosphorylated in CLL B-cells obtained from a majority of CLL patients. We wished to examine whether the constitutively phosphorylated Axl plays a pivotal role in regulating leukemic CLL B-cell survival and could be a potential target to treat this disease. We used freshly isolated purified CLL B-cells after obtaining informed written consent from the patients. Expression status of various kinases in relation to Axl expression and their functional involvement with this novel RTK to drive downstream cell survival signaling pathway(s) were analyzed in CLL B-cell lysates by immunoprecipitation/Western blot analyses using specific antibodies. Finally, we evaluated the functional importance of Axl in CLL by employing two RTK inhibitory agents (Bosutinib [SKI-606] and R428) of different specificity and affinity for receptor tyrosine kinases in order to target Axl and determined the impact on apoptotic/cytotoxic effects on CLL B-cells by flow cytometric analysis. In some experiments, we used bone marrow stromal cells to evaluate if they could diminish the impact of the RTK agent R428. To further our initial examination of Axl status in CLL, we assessed the expression of phosphorylated-Axl (P-Axl) in freshly isolated CLL B-cells by Western blot analysis. Indeed, we detected differential levels of P-Axl in CLL B-cells (n=10). Further analysis revealed that the expression of P-Axl was associated with co-expression of other constitutively phosphorylated kinases/enzymes including Src family kinases (SFKs), PI3K, SyK/ZAP70 and PLC-g2 in CLL B-cells. Importantly, we found by immunoprecipitation of Axl and subsequent Western blotting that these intracellular signaling molecules were complexed with P-Axl in primary CLL B-cells. Further analysis using a siRNA approach targeting Axl suggests that phosphorylation of Axl is an upstream event of SFK-activation in CLL B-cells indicating a pivotal role of Axl in regulating CLL B-cell survival. Finally, when Axl and Src kinases were targeted by a Src/Abl kinase inhibitor, SKI-606 (dose range 2.5–20mM) or the specific-inhibitor of Axl, R428 (dose range 0.5–10 mM) robust induction of CLL B-cell apoptosis was observed in both a dose- and time-dependent manner (Figure). Although both RTK inhibitory agents showed clear induction of apoptosis in CLL B-cells, R428 was found to be the most potent in inducing apoptosis exhibiting an IC50 ∼4-fold lower than SKI-606. Furthermore, we have observed that R428 could target P-Axl resulting in inhibition of SFK-activation further suggesting that Axl regulates SFK-activity in CLL B-cells. Interestingly, R428-induced apoptosis in CLL B-cells (doses of 1.0 mM and 2.5 mM) was significantly inhibited when these leukemic cells were co-cultured with bone marrow stromal cells, but when we tested a higher dose (5 mM) of R428 this stroma-mediated protection was overcome. Further studies are underway to test R428 in combination other chemotherapeutic agents. Thus, we have identified a novel RTK, Axl, in CLL B-cells which appears to work as a docking site for multiple non-RTKs and drives cell survival signals. These findings indicate a unique therapeutic target for CLL treatment. Importantly, there are currently several Axl inhibitory agents that are available to be tested in CLL patients. Disclosures: Holland: Rigel: Employment.

Abstract BACKGROUND: Consistent with the advanced age at diagnosis (median age ~70 years), most patients with CLL have co-existent health problems. These co-morbidities influence the ability of many CLL patients to tolerate aggressive chemotherapy-based treatment and can also contribute to treatment-related side effects. The recent development of novel signaling inhibitors, particularly the Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitor ibrutinib, has been a major treatment advance for patients with CLL. While these agents generally have favorable toxicity profiles relative to standard chemotherapy-based treatments, they are chronic therapies which patients typically stay on for an extended period. Preliminary data suggests ibrutinib may be associated with an increased risk of atrial fibrillation (Afib). In one randomized trial comparing ibrutinib to ofatumumab in patient with relapsed CLL, incident grade 3+ Afib occurred in 3% of ibrutinib treated patients compared to 0% of ofatumumab treated patients (NEJM 371:213). Despite these observations, the baseline frequency of Afib in patients with CLL is not well described - particularly incident atrial fibrillation acquired during the course of the disease. METHODS: We used the Mayo Clinic CLL database to evaluate the prevalence of Afib at the time of CLL diagnosis as well as the incidence of Afib during follow-up. All patients with a new diagnosis of CLL after January 1995 who were seen at Mayo within 12 months of diagnosis were included in the analysis. Afib was identified by chart review and by billing search using ICD9 codes. Data on co-morbid conditions associated with risk of Afib was also abstracted (e.g. hypertension, coronary artery disease [CAD], valvular heart disease, cardiomyopathy, diabetes mellitus, pulmonary disease). RESULTS: A total of 2444 patients with newly diagnosed and previously untreated CLL were seen at Mayo Clinic within 12 months of diagnosis between 1/1995 and 4/2015.Median age at diagnosis was 65 years and 1626 (66.5%) patients were men. A history of Afib was present at the time of CLL diagnosis in 148 (6.1%) patients. Four additional patients had Afib documented in the record but the precise date of onset (e.g. prior to or after CLL diagnosis date) could not be determined. Age, male sex and history of CAD, valvular heart disease, cardiomyopathy, hypertension, and diabetes were associated with a greater likelihood of having a history of Afib at the time of CLL diagnosis (all p&lt;0.01). Among the 2292 patients without a history of Afib at CLL diagnosis, 139 (6.1%) had incident Afib during the course of follow-up for their CLL. The incidence of Afib among patients without a history of Afib at diagnosis was approximately 1%/year (Figure 1A). Considering both Afib present at the time of CLL diagnosis or acquired during the course of the disease, 291 (11.9%) of the 2444 patients in this cohort experienced Afib (median follow-up: 59 months). Among patients without Afib at the time of CLL diagnosis, the following characteristics at the time of CLL diagnosis were associated with an increased risk of incident Afib on multivariate analysis: older age (age 65-74 HR=2.4, p&lt;0.001; age ≥75 HR=3.6, p&lt;0.001), male sex (HR=1.8, p=0.004); valvular heart disease (HR=2.4, p=0.007), and hypertension (HR=1.5; p=0.02). A predictive model for acquired Afib was subsequently constructed based on the independent factors in the Cox regression model. An individual weighted risk score was assigned to each independent factor based on the regression coefficients of the HRs. The Afib risk score (range 0-7) was defined as the sum of the scores of these independent factors. The risk of incident Afib among patients with risk scores of 0-1, 2-3, 4, and 5+ is shown in Figure 1B. Rates for these 4 groups were significantly different (p&lt;0.001), with the 10-year Afib rates (95% C.I.) for those with a score of 0-1, 2-3, 4, and 5+: 4% (2-6%), 9% (6-13%), 17% (11-23%), and 33% (20-43%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: A history of Afib is present in approximately 1 out of every 16 patients with newly diagnosed CLL. Among patients without Afib at diagnosis, the incidence rate of Afib is ~1%/year. The risk of incident Afib in newly diagnosed CLL patients can be predicted based on age, sex, and co-morbid health conditions present at diagnosis. These data provide context to help interpret data on the frequency of Afib in CLL patients treated with ibrutinib and other novel agents. Disclosures Shanafelt: Janssen: Research Funding; Polyphenon E Int'l: Research Funding; Glaxo-Smith_Kline: Research Funding; Cephalon: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Hospira: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Pharmactckucs: Research Funding. Ding:Merek: Research Funding. Kay:Tolero Pharm: Research Funding; Hospira: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

Abstract Introduction: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved ibrutinib in February 2014 based on results from a pivotal phase 2 clinical trial that enrolled 85 patients with relapsed/refractory CLL. A subsequent phase 3 trial confirmed the superior progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of ibrutinib compared to ofatumumab in 391 CLL patients. However, there is no information on the efficacy and safety of ibrutinib in CLL patients treated outside the context of clinical trials. Additionally, it is unclear if the reasons for discontinuation of ibrutinib differ in routine clinical practice from those described in patients treated on clinical trials. We conducted a retrospective study to evaluate these aspects in a large cohort of CLL patients treated with ibrutinib off-protocol. Methods: After IRB approval, CLL patients seen at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, and treated with commercial ibrutinib from November 2013 through July 2015 were evaluated. The baseline characteristics, time to therapy discontinuation, reasons for discontinuation and survival following discontinuation were abstracted. Results: One hundred thirty-five patients with CLL were treated during the study interval; 124 received ibrutinib for relapsed/refractory CLL and 11 received ibrutinib for treatment-naïve CLL with TP53 disruption (either del17p on FISH or TP53 mutation). Patients with relapsed/refractory CLL (n=124) Patients were high-risk, with a median of 3 prior therapies (range, 1-15), 81% had unmutated IGHV, and 38% had either del11q or del17p on FISH testing. After a median follow-up of 6.4 months, 101 remain on ibrutinib therapy. The estimated proportion of patients continuing ibrutinib at 6 months was 84% (95% CI: 77-92%) and at 12 months was 70% (95% CI: 59-83%). Of the 23 who discontinued ibrutinib therapy, 8 discontinued for progressive disease (2 progressive CLL; 6 Richter's transformation). The remaining 15 discontinued therapy for reasons other than progression, including: infection (n=3), bleeding (n=3), diarrhea (n=1), atrial fibrillation (n=1), rash (n=1), immune thrombocytopenia (n=1), renal dysfunction (n=1), severe edema (n=1), MDS (n=1) and physician preference (n=2). Table 1 shows the reasons for discontinuation of ibrutinib in patients treated on clinical trials (Maddocks, JAMA Oncology, 2015) compared to the current cohort of patients. The estimated cumulative incidence of discontinuation of ibrutinib therapy due to CLL progression/Richter's transformation at 6 and 12 months was 9% (95% CI: 4-17%) and 12% (95% CI: 5-23%), respectively. The estimated cumulative incidence of ibrutinib discontinuation due to reasons other than progression at 6 and 12 months was 10% (95% CI: 5-17%) and 22% (12-34%), respectively (Figure). The median survival after discontinuation of ibrutinib for patients who had CLL progression was 3.5 months, not reached in patients who developed Richter's transformation and not reached in those patients who discontinued ibrutinib due to reasons other than progression. Patients with treatment-naïve CLL (n=11) All patients had evidence of TP53 disruption (9 had del17p, 3 had TP53 mutation, and 1 had both). After a median follow-up of 2.8 months, no patient has had progression of CLL, and 2 patients have discontinued ibrutinib therapy for reasons other than CLL progression (atrial fibrillation, n=2). The estimated proportion of patients continuing ibrutinib at 6-months was 71% (95% CI: 45-100%). All 11 are still alive, and no patient has undergone allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Conclusion: This is the first study that describes the outcomes of a large cohort of CLL patients treated with ibrutinib outside the context of clinical trials. Patients treated in routine practice appear more likely to discontinue ibrutinib for reasons other than progression of disease, compared to those participating in clinical trials. Our results confirm the poor survival of CLL patients who progress on ibrutinib. Table 1. Comparative analysis of reasons for discontinuation of ibrutinib in patients with relapsed/refractory CLL: Characteristic Current Study (%) Maddocks (JAMA Oncology 2015) (%) No. of patients 124 308 Median follow-up (months) 6.4 20 Reasons for Discontinuation Progression of disease CLL 2 (2) 13 (4) Richter's transformation 6 (5) 15 (5) Non-progression of disease Infection 3 (2) 28 (9) Other 12 (10) 17 (5) Figure 1. Figure 1. Disclosures Ding: Merek: Research Funding. Kay:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Hospira: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Tolero Pharm: Research Funding. Shanafelt:Cephalon: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Glaxo-Smith_Kline: Research Funding; Polyphenon E Int'l: Research Funding; Hospira: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Pharmactckucs: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding.

Abstract ROR1 is a type-1 tyrosine kinase-like orphan-receptor that ordinarily is expressed during embryogenesis, but that also is found on leukemia cells of patients (pts) with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). In prior studies we found ROR1 served as a receptor for Wnt5a, which could promote survival/growth of CLL cells. We found Wnt5a in the plasma is significantly higher in pts with CLL (3.2±1.6 ng/ml (mean ±S.D.), N = 36) than in healthy adults (0.14±0.16 ng/ml, N=14, p<0.01) and also may be elaborated by accessory cells in the CLL microenvironment. On the other hand, reducing expression of ROR1 on CLL cells via siRNA adversely affected leukemia-cell survival. We hypothesized that expression of ROR1 in CLL could play a role in the pathogenesis and/or progression of this disease. Early studies failed to define differences in the expression level of ROR1 on CLL cells of different pts in a small cohort. However, upon further analyses, we observed heterogeneity in the expression levels of ROR1 among samples of different pts in larger cohort. We investigated whether the level of ROR1 expression was associated with disease progression in a cohort of 1,568 CLL pts followed by CLL Research Corium (CRC). CLL samples were uniformly examined for the expression of ROR1 using the same preparation of an Alexa-647-conjugated anti-ROR1 mAb (4A5) and a standardized procedure by the CRC Tissue Core. We used 10 CLL cases, and tested ROR1 expression at 3 different time-points for each case. We found ROR1 expression was stable over time in all CLL cases. Then, we randomly segregated pt samples into either of two cohorts, one a training set of 797, and the other a validation set of 773 cases. For the 797 cases in the training dataset, we used the profile-likelihood method in a Cox regression model of treatment-free survival (TFS) from diagnosis to determine the optimal threshold level of ROR1 expressionthat could segregate pts into 2 subgroups. In the training cohort, 294 pts were stratified into a "ROR1-Low" subgroup and 503 pts were assigned to a "ROR1-High" subgroup, defining a threshold absolute mean fluorescence intensity of CLL cells stained for ROR1 of 29. The subgroup of pts in the ROR1- High subgroup had a median TFS of 6.0 years, whereas those pts in the ROR1-Low subgroup had a median TFS of 11.0 years. We applied this threshold to segregate the 773 samples of the validation cohort into ROR1-High and ROR1-Low subgroups. We found that high-level expression of ROR1retained its strong predictive adverse effect on TFS in this validation set. The subgroup of pts in the ROR1- High subgroup had a median TFS of 5.7 years, whereas those pts in the ROR1-Low subgroup had a median TFS of 11.8 years. The immunoglobulin heavy-chain variable region (IGHV) mutation status was known for 593 of the 797 samples in the training set (74%) and 586 of the 773 samples in the validation set (76%). A significantly lower percentage of the ROR1-Low cases (34%, or 69 of 203) used unmutated IGHV than did the ROR1-High cases (54%, or 209 of 390) (p<0.001). Nonetheless, using a multivariate Cox regression model with either a non-delayed entry or a delayed entry, we observed that high-level expression of ROR1 had predictive value for short TFS (non-delayed entry HR 1.4, p<0.05; delayed entry HR 1.9, p<0.001) even when the IGHV mutation status was taken into consideration (non-delayed entry HR 2.8, p<0.001; delayed entry HR 2.7, p<0.001). Taken together, this study demonstrates that there is heterogeneity in the expression of ROR1 on CLL B cells. Furthermore, we find that a high level expression of ROR1 is associated with early disease progression in pts with CLL. Table 1. Number of cases with high versus low ROR1 and mutated versus unmutated IGHV in the training and validation cohort Training Dataset Validation Dataset ROR1 MFI distribution (Median) 0~475 (35.5) 0~424(34.6) ROR1Low with Mutated IGHV 139 132 ROR1Low with Unmutated IGHV 64 84 ROR1High with Mutated IGHV 181 156 ROR1High with Unmutated IGHV 209 214 Total With Known IGHV Mutation Status 593 586 Disclosures Keating: Celgene Corp.: Consultancy; Glaxo-Smith-Kline Inc.: Other: Advisory board. Kay:Celgene Corporation: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Tolero Pharma: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Hospira: Research Funding; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Byrd:Acerta Pharma BV: Research Funding. Gribben:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Roche/Genentech: Honoraria; Pharmacyclics: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria. Kipps:Pharmacyclics Abbvie Celgene Genentech Astra Zeneca Gilead Sciences: Other: Advisor.

Abstract Abstract 3610 Purpose Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) is incurable with conventional chemotherapy treatments. Nurturing of leukemic CLL B cells by marrow microenvironment appears to be one important method of chemoresistance (NEJM 2005). Epigallocatechin 3 gallate (EGCG), the major catechin in green tea, induces caspase-dependent death CLL B-cells and down regulates anti-apoptotic proteins (Mcl-1; XIAP) critical for enhanced apoptosis resistance of CLL B-cells (Blood 2004). In Phase I and II clinical testing, we found EGCG induced a decline in absolute lymphocyte count and/or lymphadenopathy in the majority of Rai stage 0-II CLL patients (JCO 2009; ASCO 2010). In these phase I/II studies, trough plasma EGCG levels as high as 8 mM were achieved. Since it does not cause myelosuppression, EGCG has the potential to be combined with other chemotherapeutic agents used for CLL. We previously reported that pharmacologically achievable plasma levels of EGCG have an additive or synergistic effect when combined with fludarabine (F), chlorambucil (C), and FC in the majority of patients (ASH 2009). In this study, we evaluated i) the effect of pharmacologically achievable doses of EGCG when combined with bendamustine (B) and ii) the ability of pharmacologically achievable doses of EGCG to overcome in vitro stromal rescue of CLL B-cells exposed to B or FC. Methods We first evaluated the effects of EGCG combined with B to establish if this partnership would be additive or synergistic. Primary CLL cells were treated with B (12.5-100 mM) with or without 4 uM EGCG. After 48 hours cells were stained with annexin/PI, and viability analyzed by flow cytometry. Data were analyzed using the CalcuSyn program (Chou & Talay method) to determine the combination index (indicating antagonistic, additive or synergistic effects). Next, we evaluated the ability of 4 mM EGCG to overcome stromal rescue of CLL cells treated with B or FC. To eliminate the cytotoxic effects of FC and B on stromal cells, we treated CLL cells with FC or B for 24 hours, washed with PBS, and then cultured these drug exposed cells directly on the HS-5 human stromal cell line with or without 4 mM EGCG for 48 hours (FC) or 24 hours (B). Cells were harvested and viability of CD19+ cells was assessed by annexin/PI staining. To specifically evaluate the ability of 4 mM EGCG to overcome stromal protection, co-culture samples in which no stromal protection was observed were excluded. Similar experiments were conducted using primary bone marrow mesenchymal stromal cells (MSC) from CLL patients (Leuk Res, 2007). In these experiments the fludarabine/chlorambucil combination was used as an approximation of fludarabine/cyclophosphamide since the active form of cyclophosphamide (4-hydroxycyclophosphamide) rapidly breaks down in aqueous buffer and is not readily available for in vitro use and. Results We previously observed additive or synergistic FC and EGCG interactions in a majority of patient samples (ASH 2009). 4 mM EGCG was less consistently beneficial when combined with increasing doses of B in the absence of stroma. Synergistic or mixed synergistic/additive effect was seen in 5 patients, mixed additive/antagonistic effects in 3, and antagonistic effects in 2. Given previously observed synergy with FC and additive/synergistic interactions with at least some B treated samples, we next explored the effects of EGCG on stromal cell rescue. Co-culture with HS-5 stromal cells significantly reduced both B and FC mediated cell death. However the addition of 4 μM EGCG significantly attenuated stromal cell rescue of CLL B-cells exposed to B and FC therapy (Fig. 1A and 1B respectively). Remarkably in the case of FC, 4 mM EGCG almost completely abrogated stromal rescue. Experiments using primary bone marrow MSC cultures from CLL patients yields similar results (n=3, data not shown). Conclusions Pharmacologically achievable doses of EGCG appear to reduce stromal rescue of CLL cells treated with B or combinations of purine nucleoside analog/alkylating agents. This occurs in the absence of detectable stromal cell kill by EGCG. These findings, coupled with the favorable toxicity profile and lack of myelosuppression in phase I/II trials of EGCG make it an attractive agent to test in combination with bendamustine or purine analogue/alkylating agent chemo-immunotherapy for patients with CLL. Disclosures: Shanafelt: Polyphenon Pharma: Research Funding.