Citations

Abstract Abstract 2568 Background: Obesity is associated with an increased risk of development of adult AML (Relative Risk approx. 2-fold) (Ross J, Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2004;13:1810) and significantly higher mortality in pediatric AML (Lange B, JAMA 2005;293:203). We therefore examined the association of obesity with presenting characteristics in 2 recent large ECOG phase III adult AML trials to determine whether there was a unique clinical and genetic phenotype, and also the impact of obesity on clinical outcomes (complete remission - CR; early death - ED; overall survival - OS) in association with other known risk factors. The impact of obesity on receiving full-dose daunorubicin (D) was also evaluated in these studies. We included patients (pts) from E1900 receiving standard infusional cytarabine with intensified D (45 vs. 90mg/m2) in adults age ≤60 yrs (NEJM 2009;361:1249), and from E3999 receiving conventional intensive chemotherapy +/− the MDR-inhibitor zosuquidar in adults age >60 yrs (Blood 2010;116:4077). Obesity was defined as Body Mass Index (BMI) >30kg/m2. Methods: Pt baseline characteristics were compared using Fisher's exact (categories variables) or Wilcoxon rank sum tests (continuous variables). Logistic regression models were used to examine the association between obesity and CR or ED; Cox models stratified on induction treatment arms were used to examine the association between obesity and OS. Multivariate models to examine the effect of Obesity controlled for known prognostic factors (including cytogenetics & secondary AML - sAML). Results: A total of 1089 pts (E1900, n=651; E3999, n=438) with available BMI data were included, the median follow-up of living pts is 4.7 yrs. Obesity was prevalent, with n=359 (33%) of pts with a BMI>30 at presentation. For all patients, median BMI was 27.1 (range 16.7–93.0); for non-obese patients median BMI was 25.0 (range 16.7–29.96) while for obese patients the median BMI was 34.0 (range 30.0–93.0). Obese pts were older (p=0.06), and significantly more likely female gender (p=0.05), ECOG PS>0 (p=0.01), & Intermediate Risk cytogenetics (p=0.006) but not sAML (14% overall, p=ns). Genotyping for FLT3 & MLL was performed in E1900 pts (age ≤60yrs): there was no difference in incidence of FLT3-ITD, but lower incidence of MLL-PTD was observed (p=0.08) in obese pts (not performed in E3999) (See Table). Overall, only 3.7% of pts received <90% of intended D dose. However obesity was significantly associated with receiving <90% intended D dose: in E1900, 11% of obese pts received <90% intended D (45mg/m2 cohort, p<0.001; 90mg/m2 cohort p=0.002), while in E3999 4% obese pts received <90% intended D (45mg/m2, p=0.07). There was no clear difference in toxicity/adverse events during initial induction therapy reported in obese vs. non-obese pts. On multivariate analysis obesity was not significantly associated with achieving CR (p=0.09), and had no direct independent association with ED (p=0.38). Kaplan-Meier plots of OS are shown in Figure. On multivariate analysis, age (p<0.001); ECOG PS (p<0.001); cytogenetic risk group (p<0.001); sAML (p=0.03); gender (p=0.05); and peripheral blasts (p=0.003) but not obesity were significantly associated with OS. Receiving <90% intended D dose was marginally associated with increased hazard ratio for OS (HR 1.50, 95%CI 0.98–2.28, p=0.06). Conclusion: Obesity is associated with specific presenting clinical characteristics in adult AML (female, older, PS>0, Int. risk cytogenetics, less frequent MLL-PTD), but has no direct impact on CR, ED or OS in the setting of a controlled therapeutic trial. Obese pts are at risk of receiving <90% intended D dose, which may impact OS. This analysis suggests that factors that predispose to adult AML may present with a unique clinical phenotype. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract Background: Relapse after ATRA-based induction therapy is relatively uncommon in patients with acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL). Long term follow up studies have estimated a 15-25% relapse rate. Autologous and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) has been used as an effective salvage strategy. We present a single institution study of the outcomes of patients with relapsed APL that underwent HCT. Methods: After due IRB approval, the Mayo Clinic Transplant Database was retrospectively reviewed to identify all patients across three Mayo Clinic sites with relapsed APL that underwent HCT from 1995-2013. Data was abstracted at diagnosis and at relapse. The aims of this study were to report the descriptive characteristics of patients, with a focus on HCT outcomes. Results: Baseline Patient Characteristics A total of 15 patients (9 (60%) males) with relapsed APL that underwent HCT were identified. Median age was 36 years (range: 19-63) and median follow up from diagnosis was 8.8 years (range: 1.7-17). 2 (13%) deaths (1 from relapse) were recorded. 14 (93%) received ATRA and anthracycline-based induction therapy and 1 received anthracycline-based induction without ATRA. All relapsed patients achieved a complete remission (CR) after induction. Median time to relapse was 1.6 years (range: 0.6-3.9). 10 (67%) patients had a medullary relapse (hematologic-7(70%), cytogenetic -2 (20%) and molecular-1(10%)), 3 (20%) had additional extramedullary (EM) disease (CNS-2, myeloid sarcoma-1), while 2 (13%) presented with EM disease only (CNS-2). Salvage regimens included ATRA in 5 (33%) patients and arsenic trioxide (ATO) in 8 (53%) patients. 12 (80%) patients were transplanted in CR2 and 1 in CR3 (7%), while 2 (13%) had persistent disease (PD) at time of HCT. Allogeneic HCT 4 (27%) patients with a median age of 37 years (range: 33-49) underwent allogeneic HCT. 2 (50%) patients received myeloablative (MA) conditioning and 2 received reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC). 2 patients who underwent MA HCT had PD at time of transplant, while 1 patient in CR3 received a RIC. 2 (50%) patients developed acute GVHD while 2 (50%) had extensive stage chronic GVHD. At a median follow up of 2.6 years (range: 0.3-10.9), 3 (75%) patients remain alive and disease-free. 1 patient died of infectious complications within 100 days of transplant. Autologous Transplantation 11 (73%) patients with a median age of 40 years (range: 23-68) underwent autologous HCT with MA conditioning. 7 (64%) patients were in molecular remission at time of HCT, 3 (27%) patients transplanted before 2004 were in cytogenetic remission and information about type of remission was unavailable in 1 patient. At a median follow up of 6.8 years (range: 0.5-16) since HCT, 1 (9%) patient had a documented relapse at 175 days after HCT and died of disease-related complications. 10 (91%) are alive and in remission. Conclusions: Our single-institution study reaffirms the efficacy of HCT for APL patients with medullary and EM relapse. Autologous HCT has excellent long-term results in selected patients in CR2. Allogeneic HCT was mainly reserved for patients with high risk disease (CR3) and persistent disease at time of HCT. Table 1: Baseline Patient Characteristics N (%) Number of patients 15 Follow up (years) (median, range) 8.8 (1.7-17) Age at diagnosis (years) (median, range) 36 (19-53) Gender Male 9 (60%) Female 6 (40%) Sanz risk score High 4 (29%) Intermediate 8 (57%) Low 2 (14%) Induction Regimen ATRA + anthracycline 14 (93%) Anthracycline-based 1 (7%) Response to induction therapy CR 15 (100%) Time from diagnosis to relapse (years) (median, range) 1.6 (0.6 - 3.9) Type of relapse Hematologic 7 (47%) Cytogenetic 2 (13%) Molecular 1 (7%) Hematologic and EM 3 (20%) CNS only 2 (13%) Salvage regimen ATRA-based 5 (33%) ATO-based 8 (53%) Chemotherapy only 2 (13%) Table 2: Outcomes at HCT N (%) Age at HCT (years) (median, range) 38 (23-68) Disease status at HCT CR2 12 (80%) CR3 1 (7%) PD 2 (13%) Type of HCT Allogeneic 4 (27%) Autologous 11 (73%) Conditioning regimen Myeloablative 13 (87%) Non-myeloablative 2 (13%) Follow up since HCT (years) (median, range) 4.5 (0.3 - 16.3) Disease status at last follow up CR 13 (86%) Relapsed disease 1 (7%) Unable to assess 1 (7%) Alive at last follow up 13 (87%) Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract Abstract 3816 Background: The hypomethylating agent (HMA) azacitidine (AZA) significantly improves survival compared to conventional care regimens for patients (pts) with “higher risk” MDS (including both Int-2 & High-Risk according to IPSS) (Lancet Oncol 10:223, 2009 – first presented Dec 2007); a more recent trial of the HMA decitabine (DEC) vs. best supportive care in pts with similar IPSS failed to show a significant survival advantage (JCO 29:1987, 2011 – first presented Dec 2008). Since 2006 the immunomodulatory drug lenalidomide (LEN) has been FDA-approved for treatment of anemia in lower-risk MDS pts & deletion of chromosome 5q (Del5q). However, no phase III survival data have been presented with LEN in patients with higher risk MDS, nor is it an expert consensus 1st-line treatment recommendation in higher risk setting (NCCN Guidelines 2011). We sought to evaluate the change in 1st-line treatment preference with these 3 approved agents for higher risk MDS among AHOP's from 2006–2010 in relation to pertinent survival data as it became available. Methods: Between 2006–10 we studied time dependent prescribing preferences of n=1960 AHOP's in a prospective annual research series. Approx. 330–450 individual AHOP's participated in any given year. AHOP demographic data was available from 2007–10 (n=1510); they were predominantly male (77%), working in Community setting (79% vs. 21% Academic), & in small group practice (≤5 providers −59%, including 18% “solo practice”). All regions were represented (NE 23%; SE 22%; Central 19%; SW 13%; West 23%). Most (57%) were >10yrs out from training, and only 18% were <5yrs out from training. A total sample was studied using an extensively tested, live, case-based, market research vehicle to anonymously acquire data. AHOP's were presented with a scenario of an older pt with higher risk MDS (High-Risk 2006–09; Int-2 in 2010) & specific cytogenetic abnormalities, then indicated their preferred treatment from up to 10 relevant available/emerging 1st-line therapeutic options. In each, the scenario was of a pt age 63 yrs (2006–08) or 68–70 yrs (2009–10); with symptomatic anemia & pancytopenia; no response to darbepoietin; with RAEB-2 - excess Bone Marrow blasts 11% (2006–09) to 16% (2010); complex (2006–09) or normal cytogenetics (2010); and both without and then with Del5q in same scenario (2008–10). The distribution of treatment choices was compared over time & according to Del5q status using a chi-square test. Results are shown in Table below. In NON-Del5q scenario, a clear & significant shift toward greater AZA preference by almost 2-fold (from 40% to 78%) was apparent after 2007 (P<0.0001). For same scenario With Del5q (2008–2010), treatment preferences changed significantly over time (P<0.0001), with lower 1st-line AZA and greater DEC & LEN preference (the latter >40% after 2008). In addition, a marked and significant increase in 1st-line LEN preference was observed when AHOP's were presented with the same higher-risk scenario each yr but With-Del5q vs. NON-Del5q (p<0.0001). For “Non Del 5q” vs. “With Del 5q” scenarios, p-values result from a chi-square test, testing for any difference in the distribution of treatment choices over time. *(p<0.0001) - LEN With-Del5q vs. NON-Del5q in higher-risk scenario each year, 2008–2010. Conclusions: Significant changes in 1st-line treatment preferences of AHOPs for pts with higher-risk MDS are apparent in the findings from 2008–10, the time frame following the availability of randomized phase III data demonstrating a survival advantage for AZA therapy. When the presence of a Del5q abnormality is added to the same higher-risk scenario, treatment preferences change dramatically with a significantly increased preference for LEN (despite no available ph III survival data supporting this approach) and for DEC (despite a “negative” ph III trial). These findings suggest important educational gaps concerning the available phase III survival data supporting first line prescribing preferences for patients with higher risk MDS. Efforts to address this gap via evidence-based approaches are warranted. Disclosures: Foran: Celgene: Honoraria; Xcenda: Honoraria. Williams:Xcenda: Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Independent DSMB member, Research Funding. Willey:Xcenda: Employment; Celgene: Business relationship; Eisai: Business relationship. Green:Xcenda: Employment; Celgene: Business relationship; independent DSMB; Eisai: Business relationship.

Abstract Background: Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is a potentially curative treatment for primary myelofibrosis (PMF). Reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) allows otherwise ineligible patients to proceed with HSCT. Host factors in PMF such as bone marrow (BM) fibrosis, massive splenomegaly, and transfusion related allo-immunization increase the risk of engraftment failure, especially with RIC. Spleen directed therapy (SDT) is often used in PMF patients with splenomegaly to help with engraftment, however little data exists supporting this practice. This study was carried out to investigate the role for SDT and the predictors of outcomes with RIC HSCT for PMF. Methods :After IRB approval, the Mayo Clinic HSCT registry was queried for patients with PMF that underwent RIC allo-HSCT from 2005-2014. Disease and transplant related data were retrospectively abstracted and analyzed for HSCT related outcomes. SDT was defined as a therapeutic strategy with specific intent to overcome an enlarged spleen prior to HSCT and included splenectomy, splenic artery embolization, splenic irradiation, or JAK inhibitor therapy that was stopped <30 days before HSCT. Survival estimates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and means were compared using the log-rank test. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed using Cox regression modeling. Results :51 patients (67% males) with WHO defined PMF with palpable splenomegaly that underwent RIC allo-HSCT were included in the study; median age 57 years (range, 35-68). The median follow-up was 12.2 months, and at last follow up, 19 deaths (37%) and 4 relapses (8%) were documented. The median OS for the group was not reached (mean 34.2 months); 88% at 100 days and 60% at 2 years. 17 deaths were attributed to non-relapse mortality (NRM). There were 3 engraftment failures (6%). 32 patients (63%) developed acute GVHD (grades II-IV) and 24 patients (47%) developed chronic GVHD (all grades). Twenty-one patients (41%) received SDT; 10 (48%) splenectomy, 2 (9%) splenic irradiation, and 9 (43%) JAK inhibitor therapy (ruxolitinib). The SDT group had a median spleen size of 14.5 cm (range, 1-29 cm) below the left costal margin (LCM) and 13 patients (62%) with spleen size >10 cm below LCM, while the no SDT group had a median spleen size of 7 cm (range, 1-19 cm) and 12 patients (40%) with spleen size >10 cm below LCM; p = 0.01. Seven (64%) of 11 patients receiving splenic irradiation (n = 1) or JAK inhibitor therapy (n = 6) were eligible for IWG-MRT spleen response, and 2 (29%) responded (both in JAK inhibitor group). Of the remaining 5 patients, 2 had a response not meeting IWG-MRT criteria. There were no differences in age (p = 0.09), gender (p = 1.0), DIPSS + score (p = 0.35), or HCT-CI (p = 0.61) between the two groups. There was a statistically significant difference in engraftment failure, with all 3 engraftment failures occurring in the SDT group (2 splenectomy patients, 1 splenic irradiation patient; p = 0.02). Engraftment failures were not attributable to insufficient cell dose, donor specific antibodies, or identifiable host factors. The patient with engraftment failure who underwent splenic irradiation had persistent massive splenomegaly. There were similar outcomes with regards to relapse rates, NRM, and acute and chronic GVHD. In the SDT group, the median OS was 13.3 months; 81% at 100 days and 33% at 2 years. In the no SDT group, the median OS was not reached; 94% at 100 days and 68% at 2 years; p=0.13. In a univariate survival analysis that included age, gender, SDT, DIPSS+ score, HCT-CI, CMV status, ABO status, HLA matching, donor source, graft source, engraftment status, and acute and chronic GVHD, predictors of survival were engraftment failure (p = 0.02) and major/bidirectional ABO incompatibility (p = 0.02). Similar results were obtained when JAK inhibitor therapy was considered separately from other forms of SDT. In a multivariate analysis, engraftment failure (HR 8.2, 1.8-27.2; p = 0.01) and major/bidirectional ABO incompatibility (HR 4.1, 1.4-10.9; p = 0.009) retained independent prognostic significance. Discussion:In patients with PMF and splenomegaly, there was no demonstrable benefit from SDT. Predictors of post-HSCT survival included engraftment failure and major/bidirectional ABO incompatibility. These findings need validation in a larger cohort of patients. Disclosures Al-Kali: Celgene: Research Funding. Mesa:Gilead: Research Funding; Incyte Corporation: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; CTI Biopharma: Research Funding; Promedior: Research Funding; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Consultancy; NS Pharma: Research Funding.

Abstract Background: Large case-control studies have identified common epidemiologic exposures associated with risk of AML development, including obesity [BMI ≥30 kg/m2] associated with 2-fold increase risk. However it is not known whether individual risk factors are associated with unique AML genetic lesions. We have recently identified a significant association of some common exposures including obesity with unique disease cytogenetic subgroups in a cohort of n=295 consecutive AML patients diagnosed and treated at Mayo Clinic [Cancer Epidemiol 39:1084, 2015]. Aberrant DNA methylation is a hallmark of cancer and has been reported in AML, and we therefore performed an analysis of global DNA methylation in patients in this cohort to determine whether specific epidemiologic exposures are associated with a unique pattern of DNA methylation. Methods: Patients in the initial cohort were previously reported. An available baseline AML bone marrow cytogenetic pellet from diagnosis was identified for n=148 patients (50.2%). Following IRB approval and using previously reported techniques [Leukemia 24:1283, 2010], leukemia DNA was isolated from the remnant diagnostic cytogenetic samples and processed on the HumanMethylation450 BeadChip array (Illumina). Individual CpG dinucleotides were assigned a Beta value (i.e. methylation value) ranging from 0 (unmethylated) to 1 (methylated). We excluded those with minor methylation changes (<0.2 between any two samples), resulting in 383,524 CpG's. For the purposes of this first analysis we have focused only on CpG's with an inter-quartile range (IQR, i.e. difference between 75th and 25th percentiles) of greater than 0.25, comprising a total of 39,657 CpG's. An unsupervised cluster analysis of differential methylation was generated ("Heatmap", Figure). Univariate and multivariable analyses were performed adjusting for age as a continuous variable to determine the association of individual exposures with unique methylation clusters (primary endpoint), and we also evaluated the association of clinical characteristics and clinical outcomes after therapy (secondary endpoint). The median age of patients was 69 yrs (range 19-89), male 65%, and Caucasian 89%. The median BMI was 27.2 (range 16.9-59.9), and n=47 patients (32%) had BMI ≥30. Standard cytogenetic risk groups were applied [favorable (n=8), normal (n=61), intermediate abnormal (n=32) and poor (n=47)]. Results: We identified 4 distinct methylation clusters (Figure: Cluster #1, Black horizontal bar; Cluster #2, Green; Cluster #3, Blue; and Cluster #4, Red). Multivariate analysis of select variables is shown in Table. Patients in cluster #1 were significantly more likely to have a BMI ≥30 [Odds Ratio (OR) 2.49, p=0.017] and more likely to have favorable risk cytogenetics although this was not statistically significant [OR 6.71, p=0.088], while those in cluster #2 were significantly more likely to be have a history of regular NSAID use [OR 3.26, p=0.03] and less likely to have normal [OR 0.40, p=0.044] and possibly intermediate abnormal cytogenetics [OR 0.34, p=0.051]. Those in cluster #3 were significantly younger [median age 48 yrs, p<0.001] and were also more likely to have prior history MDS although this was not statistically significant [OR 3.7, p=0.082]. Cluster #4 was not correlated with any distinct exposure apart from possible decreased alcohol use [OR 0.3, p=0.079]. History of past or current tobacco use, regular acetaminophen use, documented myelotoxin exposure, family history, and secondary AML did not correlate with a unique methylation cluster. There was no independent association of methylation cluster with overall survival (p=0.46), although among patients receiving intensive therapy cluster #2 was associated with lower complete remission rate [OR 0.28 (95% CI 0.09-0.86), p=0.026]. Conclusion: This first analysis of AML molecular epidemiology and clinical outcome suggests that specific disease risk factors (esp. obesity and age) are associated with unique leukemia DNA methylation clusters. In addition, aberrant methylation is associated with some clinical features and with outcome after therapy, suggesting that epidemiologic risk factors may have a prognostic impact. This provides novel insight into leukemogenesis, and will guide prospective studies of AML epidemiology and outcome. Figure. Figure. Disclosures Foran: medscape: Honoraria; pfizer: Honoraria; Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding; novartis: Honoraria; karyopharm: Honoraria; boehringer ingelheim: Research Funding; agios: Research Funding; Cellerant: Research Funding.

Abstract Background Myeloid neoplasms (MN) occurring secondary to treatment of non-malignant disease, especially autoimmune diseases (AID), and the overlap between them, is an increasing clinically important observation. Confounding variables for myeloid transformation include the nature of autoimmune disease as an incessant, chronically activated inflammatory cascade that has been associated with an increased risk of myeloid malignancy, and disease modifying therapies, often with cytotoxic and immunosuppressive drugs. Thus, the addition of therapeutic agents for treatment of AID theoretically amplifies the opportunity for MN to develop in genetically susceptible individuals. To our knowledge, there is no large study evaluating a comprehensive primary AID population that developed MDS or AML with detailed assessment of therapeutic interventions for AID. The presented study queries the association of cytotoxic, anti-inflammatory, and immune-modulating agents to treat AID as risk factors for developing myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) or acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Methods In a 10-year period from 2004-2014, a total of 40,011 patients with an ICD-9 coded diagnosis of AID were seen at Mayo Clinic Arizona and Florida campuses; 311 patients from this population had a concomitant coded diagnosis of MDS and/or AML. In an IRB approved, retrospective chart review, we confirmed 86 cases meeting strict inclusion criteria for AID and confirmed MDS or AML. We performed a case-control match from the same primary autoimmune population for age, gender, and autoimmune specific diagnosis at a 2:1 ratio querying for therapeutic interventions. Results Myeloid neoplasm specifics in our case cohort of 86 patients were 55 MDS, 21 de novo AML, and 10 AML with history of MDS. Average age was 72 years with a slight male predominance (57%). Rheumatoid arthritis (26.4%), psoriasis (20.7%), systemic lupus (13.8%), was the most common autoimmune profiles. Median onset of autoimmune disease to diagnosis of myeloid neoplasm was 6 years (range 1-54 years). Up to 26% controls documented no systemic agent for treatment of autoimmune disease and similarly 12.8% of the case cohort (p=0.142). Case and control populations treated with systemic therapies had similar exposures by category for immune-modulating agents (33.7% and 37.8% respectively) and cytotoxic therapies (47.7 and 44.8% respectively). A total of 57/86 cases (66.3%) received either a cytotoxic or immune-modulating agent. In comparison, 105/172 (61.1%) controls received either agent; p=0.495. Azathioprine was the only statistically significant agent exposure observed more frequently in the study cohort than controls with an OR of 7.05 (p= < 0.001). There was no increased incidence of MDS or AML in TNF-antagonist treated patients. No significant correlation for duration of agent exposure by drug category was observed. Discussion In a large primary AID population, azathioprine exposure was associated with a 7 fold risk of MDS or AML (p=< 0.001). Notable, but not statistically significant case cohort trends among cytotoxic agents was exposure to cyclophosphamide (OR 3.58) followed by mitoxantrone (OR 2.73). Methotrexate, mercaptopurine, and mycophenolate had favorable odd ratios, but these were not statistically significant. No association was found for TNF-inhibitory agents. Finally, there was no association of drug exposure time to the incidence in development of MDS or AML. Disclosures Dueck: Bayer: Honoraria. Mesa:Gilead: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy; Celgene: Research Funding; Incyte Corporation: Research Funding; Galena: Consultancy; Ariad: Consultancy; CTI: Research Funding; Promedior: Research Funding. Al-Kali:Onconova Therapeutics, Inc.: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding. Foran:Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding; novartis: Honoraria; karyopharm: Honoraria; medscape: Honoraria; pfizer: Honoraria; boehringer ingelheim: Research Funding; agios: Research Funding; Cellerant: Research Funding.

Abstract Background: International Working Group (IWG) has set criteria in 2003 for response assessment in patients with AML; at which time intensive chemotherapy was the main therapy (Cheson, JCO 2003). Hypomethylating agents (HMA) were approved shortly after for the treatment of elderly AML (Fenaux, JCO 2009; Dombret et al Blood 2015). Although few patients achieve a deep response, the majority will have stable disease (SD), some of which could last several months while patients continue to receive HMA and gain clinical benefit. We hereby describe outcomes for patients who achieve SD with HMA for the treatment of elderly unfit AML patients. Methods: A total of 56 AML patients' data from Feb 2007 to June 2015 at Mayo Clinic were reviewed after appropriate IRB approval was obtained. All cases had their bone marrow slides reviewed at our institution. Patients were considered for our study if they received HMA as frontline therapy for their AML. Patients who received HMAs after induction chemotherapy failure or for their MDS were excluded. Response was identified based on 2003 IWG AML response criteria. Patients with SD were categorized into short-lasting (<6 cycles of HMA, cohort 1) or long-lasting (≥6 cycles of HMA, cohort 2) SD.Prognostic factors were analyzed by univariate and multivariate analyses. Survival estimates were calculated using Kaplan-Meier curves and univariate and multivariate analyses was based on log-rank testing using JMP software version 10. Results: i) Characteristics: Fifty six AML patients were treated with HMA as frontline therapy with median age of 76 years (range, 59-91), 68% of which were males. Therapy related AML (T-AML) was seen in 2% of the cases. Cytogenetics were favorable risk in 2%, intermediate in 62%, and poor in 36%. Complete remission (CR) was found in 10 (18%) patients, CR with incomplete count recovery in 3 (5%), partial remission (PR) in 3 (5%) patients. Forty patients were non-responders (SD). ii) Characteristics of HMA SD cohorts: Upon comparison of cohort 1 versus cohort 2 there was no statistical significance in median age, white blood count, absolute neutrophil count, platelets, peripheral blood and bone marrow blasts, bone marrow cellularity and sex. Median number of cycles was expectedly higher in cohort 2 vs 1 (9 vs 2, p<0.0001). Intermediate cytogenetic risk was more common in cohort 2 vs 1 (90% vs 43%, p=0.006), while poor risk was more common in cohort 1 vs 2 (57% vs 10%, p=0.006). Only 10% had complex karyotype in cohort 2 compared to 50% in cohort 1 (p=0.017). NPM1 mutation was absent in all cases, while FLT3 mutation was present 30% in cohort 1 and 25% in cohort 2 (p = 0.9). Decitabine was more commonly given in cohort 1 vs cohort 2 (80% vs 50%, p =0.07). iii) Clinical outcome of HMA SD cohorts : Median overall survival was higher in long-lasting SD patients (cohort 2) vs short-lasting SD (18 vs 4 months, p = 0.0002). Upon multivariate analysis, both age (p <0.0001) and long-lasting SD (p =0.01) were statistically significant for overall survival but not cytogenetics risk grouping nor type of HMA administered. Conclusions: Standard response criteria for AML by IWG were developed for intensive chemotherapy and do not apply to newer agents, specifically HMA. Stable disease (SD) could be meaningful to some elderly AML patients when treated with HMA. Intermediate cytogenetics and azacitidine use were more frequent in patients with long-lasting SD. Long-lasting SD did confer a survival benefit in elderly AML patients. Newer response criteria for assessing novel agents' efficacy are needed in this population. Figure Figure. Disclosures Tibes: Italfarmaco S.p.A.: Consultancy, Honoraria. Foran:pfizer: Honoraria; Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding; medscape: Honoraria; karyopharm: Honoraria; novartis: Honoraria; boehringer ingelheim: Research Funding; agios: Research Funding; Cellerant: Research Funding. Al-Kali:Novartis: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding.

Abstract Background: Persistence of minimal residual disease (MRD) after induction, consolidation and salvage therapies is an independent poor prognostic marker in AML. The bone marrow (BM) microenvironment is a protective niche that promotes chemotherapy resistance of leukemia cells. This residual subset of chemotherapy-resistant cells present during remission eventually contributes to the leukemia relapse/persistence. Adhesion of AML cells to BM stroma is dependent on the CXCR4 receptor binding to its ligand CXCL12. High levels of CXCR4 expression correlate with poor survival in AML. It is postulated that blocking the CXCL12/CXCR4 axis will dislodge AML cells from the protective microenvironment and, when combined with chemotherapy, may improve the response to therapy. BL-8040 (BKT140) is a short peptide which inhibits the binding of CXCR4 to CXCL12, resulting in mobilization of leukemic blasts from the BM to the peripheral blood (PB). BL-8040 has strong affinity for the CXCR4 receptor with long receptor occupancy and as a single agent induces differentiation and apoptosis of leukemia cells in preclinical models. A clinical trial assessing the safety and efficacy of BL-8040 in combination with cytarabine (Ara-C) for the treatment of relapsed/refractory AML patients was recently completed (NCT01838395). Here we report results from correlative studies done on samples from patients who participated in this trial. Objective: To assess BL-8040 single agent anti leukemia effects in relapsed/refractory AML. Method: Patients received a once daily SC dose of BL-8040 monotherapy on days 1-2 followed by the same dose of BL-8040 plus Ara-C (1.5g/m2 for patients ≥60; 3g/m2 for patients <60) per day on days 3-7. Six dose levels of BL-8040 (0.5 - 2.0 mg/kg) were tested. PD parameters such as mobilization of leukemic blasts and induction of differentiation and apoptosis were assessed after monotherapy with BL-8040 using frequent PB sampling and BM aspirates at baseline and on day 3 prior to Ara-C administration. Results: 45 patients (including 3 receiving compassionate use BL-8040) with a median age of 61 yrs were treated. The majority of patients had poor risk disease with 24% secondary AML and 17% with prior allogeneic stem-cell transplantation. Most patients were heavily pretreated with 19% relapsing after a short first remission (CR1 ≤12 months), 17% had ≥2 relapses and 45% refractory to 1-2 inductions. The CR+CRi rate was 38% in subjects receiving BL-8040 dose ≥1.0 mg/kg (n=39). Ongoing follow-up (FU) of responding patients (expansion phase; N=19) shows median EFS of 9.3 months (range 4.3-12.8 months). At the time of this analysis 10/19 patients are alive with a FU range of 0.96 - 12.8 months. FACS analysis revealed that BL-8040 monotherapy triggered an average 4.3-fold increase of immature AML blasts (CD45+Low/CD34+/CD117+/HLA-DR+) in PB (i.e., mobilization). Response to treatment was associated with more robust mobilization of AML blasts following BL-8040 monotherapy (responders 9.5 vs non-responders 1.7 fold median). Preferential mobilization of AML blasts over normal cells (4.7 fold vs. 1.4 fold, respectively) was confirmed by FISH analysis in a subset of patients with informative cytogenetic abnormalities. Induction of granulocytic differentiation of immature leukemia progenitors (2.5 fold) in the BM following BL-8040 monotherapy was noted. Finally, induction of AML blasts apoptosis (40% increase) by BL-8040 alone was evident by FACS in day 3 (pre-araC) bone marrow biopsies. Conclusions: The data demonstrate that sustained blockade of the CXCR4-CXCL12 axis with BL-8040 is safe and well tolerated and when given in combination with Ara-C improves the response rate achieved historically with Ara-C alone. In addition, treatment with BL-8040 as a single agent rapidly and efficiently induces mobilization, differentiation and cell death of AML blasts. This selective effect on chemotherapy-resistant cells may be translated into reduction of residual disease arguing for incorporation into front-line trials and such studies are ongoing. Disclosures Foran: Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding; medscape: Honoraria; karyopharm: Honoraria; pfizer: Honoraria; novartis: Honoraria; boehringer ingelheim: Research Funding; agios: Research Funding; Cellerant: Research Funding. DiPersio:Incyte Corporation: Research Funding. Peled:Biokine Therapeutics: Employment. Abraham:Biokine Therapeutics Ltd: Employment. Pereg:BioLineRx Ltd: Employment. Vainstein:BioLineRx Ltd.: Employment. Oberkovitz:BioLineRx Ltd.: Employment. Aharon:BioLineRx Ltd.: Employment. Cortes:ARIAD: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Teva: Research Funding.

Background: Although 5-azacitidine (5-AZA) is the standard of care for patients with higher-risk patients with Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) almost all patients will fail 5-AZA therapy with the majority of patients progressing within 2 years. Two-year survival for MDS patients refractory to 5-AZA is only 15%. There is a need for more effective therapies for these patients with higher-risk MDS. The Inhibitors of Apoptosis (IAP) Proteins are a family of molecules that suppress apoptotic cell death. Expression of IAPs is dysregulated in MDS, supporting potential as therapeutic targets. SMAC (second mitochondrial activator of caspases) is an IAP antagonist, resulting in caspase activation, inhibition of the pro-survival transcription factor NF-kB and increased apoptosis leading to tumor cell death. Birinapant is a potent bivalent SMAC mimetic in clinical development for the treatment of several cancers. Pre-clinical data support its investigation in myeloid malignancies, specifically MDS. Methods: This Phase 1b study was designed to determine the MTD and recommended Phase 2 dose and schedule of birinapant in combination with 5-AZA in patients with higher-risk MDS who are naïve to or have relapsed or are refractory to 5-AZA. Secondary objectives included determining the clinical activity of the combination of birinapant plus 5-AZA, and assessing the pharmacokinetics (PK) and exploratory biomarkers. Results: Twenty-one patients were enrolled, of whom 15 had high/very high risk MDS, with median IPSS score of 3 (range, 1.5-8). Median age (range) was 73 years (48-84 years). Eight patients were therapy-naïve. All patients received 5-AZA, administered either intravenous (IV; 13 patients) or subcutaneous (SC; 8 of whom 4 later switched to IV), at 75 mg/m2 for 7 days of a 28-day cycle in combination with birinapant. Birinapant was administered IV twice weekly (Days 1 and 4) at 13 mg/m2 for either 3 of 4 weeks (15 patients; Cohort 1 and Expansion Cohort) or 4 of 4 weeks (6 patients; Cohort 2) in 28-day cycles. No cycle 1 dose-limiting toxicities were observed. Adverse events ≥Grade 3 observed in two or more patients were thrombocytopenia (9 patients); pneumonia (including fungal pneumonia; 8); anemia (8); leukopenia (7); febrile neutropenia (7) neutropenia (5); fatigue (4); respiratory failure (3); cellulitis or soft tissue necrosis (3); and nausea, vomiting, or hypoxia (2 patients each). SAEs seen in more than one patient included pneumonia (6 patients, including fungal pneumonia); febrile neutropenia (4); sepsis (3) and cellulitis or soft tissue necrosis (3). Grade 3 abdominal soft tissue necrosis occurred in the area of subcutaneous injections of 5-AZA, and two events of Grade 3 cellulitis were judged related to treatment. These local injection site reactions were more severe than expected with SC 5-AZA, and were not observed with subsequent IV administration. These events were not considered DLTs. Treatment-related suppression of NF-k B activity was evident in circulating blast cells from patients in Cohort 1 suggesting pharmacodynamic activity of birinapant at this dose and schedule. Based on this, the Phase 2 dosing regimen has been recommended as birinapant administered at 13 mg/m2 IV twice weekly for 3 weeks of a 28-day cycle in combination with 5-AZA at 75 mg/m2 IV daily for 7 days of a 28-day cycle. Although not a primary endpoint, evidence of clinical activity, as demonstrated by significant reduction in marrow blast percentages, was seen, including 3 patients considered relapsed or refractory to prior therapy. Nine patients of 20 evaluable (45%) demonstrated either a ≥50% decrease in marrow blast count, or a blast count of ≤5% at the end of Cycle 1 or 2. Two additional patients (10%) demonstrated hematological improvement in one or more peripheral cell lineages without transfusions. In addition, 2 patients, one of whom had previously received 5-AZA, could be bridged to stem cell transplant subsequent to response with birinapant plus 5-AZA. Several patients remain in active follow-up. Conclusion: This Phase 1b trial confirms the acceptable safety profile of the combination of birinapant administered with IV 5-AZA. Evidence of clinical activity in both 5-AZA naïve and refractory patients provide the rationale for an ongoing global randomized, blinded Phase 2 study comparing birinapant in combination with 5-AZA vs. 5-AZA alone in patients with higher-risk MDS in the front-line setting. Disclosures Wang: Immunogen: Research Funding. Rakkar:TetraLogic Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Minderman:TetraLogic Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Burns:TetraLogic Pharmaceuticals: Employment. Tibes:TetraLogic Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding.

Abstract Background: Current tumor profiling analytics provide some insight into the various molecular abnormalities and their individual consequences on oncogenic signaling. However, these analyses are limited by their lack of integration where the combined effect of individual mutations, gene copy number variations and chromosomal aberrations are not consolidated to create the global molecular architecture that supports neoplastic growth, particularly in the context of drug resistance. Consequentially, identities of the preferential oncogenic pathway(s) tumor cells employ to oppose the effects of targeted therapies remain cryptic and unactionable. Here we present a simulation-based method, which not only replicates the molecular architecture of ibrutinib-resistant Waldenstroms Macroglobulinemia (WM, for which ibrutinib is the only FDA-approved agent) in silico, but also predicts cell sensitivity towards existing drugs, which we validated experimentally for potential clinical translation. Materials: We used the newly established human WM cell line, RPCI-WM1/IR, as a surrogate model of ibrutinib-refractory WM. Genomic data including whole exome sequencing (WES) and copy number analysis (CNA) was utilized for the creation of an avatar of RPCI-WM1/IR, which through simulation identified the salient and prominently dysregulated cellular pathways. Importantly, illustrating these pathways highlights common convergence points on increased proliferation and viability. These convergence points were then directly and indirectly targeted by simulated testing of a library of FDA approved drugs and those impacting these dysregulated pathways were nominated. Importantly, this simulation avatar approach not only looks for agents acting on the specific gene mutation, but also predicts the convergence points to be attacked. The personalized simulation avatar technology is a comprehensive functional proteomics representation of the WM physiology network. A standardized library of equations models all the biological reactions such as enzymatic reactions, allosteric binding and protein modulation by phosphorylation, de-phosphorylation, ubiquitination, acetylation, prenylation and others. Results: Several genomic aberrations were used to create the RPCI-WM1/IR simulation avatar. Functional activity (based on mutation or copy number alteration) of several ibrutinib targets or transcription factors associated with BTK activity such as FYN, SP1, BMX and FRK were predicted to be lost. Increased expression of CAV1, which also inhibits BTK mediated signaling, was increased. An increase in CSNK2B, which activates PU.1- a transcriptional target of BTK, was also observed. Of note, no CXCR4 mutations, which have been shown to impact ibrutinib response, were observed. Next, the cytotoxic potential of over 150 FDA approved drug (and some in experimental stages) were simulated individually and in combination on the RPCI-WM1/IR avatar. In silico modeling predicted aberrant activity of aurora kinase A (AURKA) and its associated signaling partners, which could be disrupted with the (AURKA) inhibitor, tozasertib. AURKA activation was predicted as upregulated due to alterations in several genes: RASA1 loss and SOS1 increase --> increased ERK --> increased ETS1 --> increased AURKA. High beta-catenin signaling (high CTNNB1 and FZD1/4 and low AXIN1 and GSK3B) was also shown to increase AURKA. The simulation predictions were experimentally validated in vitro where AURKA inhibition with tozasertib significantly inhibited proliferation of RPCI-WM1/IR cells (IC50~14nM) as well as inducing apoptosis (48hr, 20nM treatment) and cell-cycle arrest. Conclusions: Our data demonstrates the potential of in silico modeling in predicting novel drug targets, allowing guidance in 1.) Delineating operational oncogenic circuits in an ibrutinib-resistant state by reanimation of the molecular architecture in silico, 2.) Calculating the impact of individual genomic abnormalities and their collective influence on maintaining tumor survival and 3.) Performing a rapid in-silico drug-sensitivity screen directed by the pathway analyses, which can be validated experimentally using standard assays. This novel approach holds tremendous potential in creating highly personalized therapies for ibrutinib-refractory WM patients based on unique genetic signatures. Disclosures Vali: Cellworks Group, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Kumar:Cellworks Group, Inc.: Employment. Singh:Cellworks Group, Inc.: Employment. Abbasi:Cellworks Group, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership.