Citations

Background— The multicenter PROTECT AF study (Watchman Left Atrial Appendage System for Embolic Protection in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation) was conducted to determine whether percutaneous left atrial appendage closure with a filter device (Watchman) was noninferior to warfarin for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation. Methods and Results— Patients (n=707) with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation and at least 1 risk factor (age >75 years, hypertension, heart failure, diabetes, or prior stroke/transient ischemic attack) were randomized to either the Watchman device (n=463) or continued warfarin (n=244) in a 2:1 ratio. After device implantation, warfarin was continued for ≈45 days, followed by clopidogrel for 4.5 months and lifelong aspirin. Study discontinuation rates were 15.3% (71/463) and 22.5% (55/244) for the Watchman and warfarin groups, respectively. The time in therapeutic range for the warfarin group was 66%. The composite primary efficacy end point included stroke, systemic embolism, and cardiovascular death, and the primary analysis was by intention to treat. After 1588 patient-years of follow-up (mean 2.3±1.1 years), the primary efficacy event rates were 3.0% and 4.3% (percent per 100 patient-years) in the Watchman and warfarin groups, respectively (relative risk, 0.71; 95% confidence interval, 0.44%–1.30% per year), which met the criteria for noninferiority (probability of noninferiority >0.999). There were more primary safety events in the Watchman group (5.5% per year; 95% confidence interval, 4.2%–7.1% per year) than in the control group (3.6% per year; 95% confidence interval, 2.2%–5.3% per year; relative risk, 1.53; 95% confidence interval, 0.95–2.70). Conclusions— The “local” strategy of left atrial appendage closure is noninferior to “systemic” anticoagulation with warfarin. PROTECT AF has, for the first time, implicated the left atrial appendage in the pathogenesis of stroke in atrial fibrillation. Clinical Trial Registration:— URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT00129545.

Background— There are evidence-based guidelines for staging of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), but we are not aware of any evidence comparing the strategy of complete revascularization (CR) with PCI in the index admission versus the strategy of staging in a subsequent admission for patients with coronary artery disease without STEMI. Methods and Results— PCI patients without STEMI undergoing PCI in New York between 2007 and 2009 were separated into 2 groups: those with acute coronary syndrome but no STEMI, and those without acute coronary syndrome. For each group, patients who underwent CR in the index admission were then propensity matched to patients staged within 60 days to obtain CR based on 17 patient risk factors related to longer-term mortality, and 3-year mortality rates were compared for the propensity-matched groups. Outcomes were also compared for preselected subgroups. For propensity-matched patients without acute coronary syndrome, the all-cause mortality rates at 3 years for patients who underwent CR in the index hospitalization and patients staged for CR within 60 days of discharge were 5.62% and 5.97%, P =0.93, respectively. For propensity-matched patients with acute coronary syndrome but without STEMI, the all-cause mortality rates at 3 years for patients who underwent CR in the index hospitalization and patients staged for CR within 60 days of discharge were 6.59% and 5.92%, P =0.41, respectively. Conclusions— Patients with coronary artery disease without STEMI do not have significantly lower 3-year mortality rates with staged PCI than when they undergo CR in the index admission.

Background— The clinical efficacy of alcohol septal ablation for obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) has been demonstrated, but the long-term effects of the procedure remain uncertain. This study examined the survival of patients after septal ablation performed in a tertiary HCM referral center. Methods and Results— We examined 177 patients (mean age, 64 years; 68% women) who underwent septal ablation at our institution. Over a follow-up of 5.7 years, survival free of all mortality was no different than the expected survival for a comparable general population, and similar to that of age- and sex-matched patients who underwent isolated surgical myectomy (8-year survival estimate, 79% versus 79%; P =0.64). For the end point of documented sudden cardiac death or unknown cause of death, the incidence per 100 person-year follow-up was 1.31 (95% confidence interval, 0.60–2.38). Residual left ventricular outflow tract gradient after ablation was an independent predictor of long-term survival free of any death. Conclusions— In this nonrandomized study of carefully selected patients undergoing septal ablation by experienced operators in a tertiary referral HCM center, long-term survival was favorable and similar to that of an age- and sex-matched general population, and to patients undergoing surgical myectomy, as well, without an increased risk of sudden cardiac death.

We present the case of a patient who underwent repeated ablations for atrial fibrillation and presented with recurrent dyspnea, elevated left atrial pressure with large V waves in the absence of mitral regurgitation. This case provides an example of “stiff left atrial syndrome” as has been described in patients with mitral valve replacement and only recently in patients with radiofrequency ablations for atrial fibrillation. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

ObjectivesTo compare 2‐year outcomes (mortality, mortality/myocardial infarction (MI), target vessel PCI (TVPCI), and target lesion PCI (TLPCI)) for patients receiving EES and ZES.BackgroundThe utilization of drug‐eluting coronary stents (DES) among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) has increased dramatically in the last decade. Everolimus‐eluting stents (EES) and ENDEAVOR zotarolimus eluting stents (ZES) constitute the latest generation of approved DES in the United States, but little is known about their relative effectiveness.MethodsNew York patients undergoing EES and ZES revascularization without any other type of stent between 7/08 and 12/08 were propensity matched at the hospital level using multiple patient, operator, and hospital characteristics, and matched patients were followed through the end of 2010 to obtain comparative 2‐year outcomes.ResultsA total of 3286 patients were propensity‐matched. Patients receiving EES had a significantly lower TVPCI rate (9.0% vs. 11.9%, AHR = 1.31, 95% CI (1.04, 1.65)) and a significantly lower TLPCI rate (6.0% vs. 8.3%, AHR = 1.35, 95% CI (1.02, 1.79)). There was no significant difference between EES and ZES for mortality or MI/mortality.ConclusionsThere were no significant differences in the hard endpoints of death or MI between patients who received EES versus those who received ZES (ENDEAVOR). Patients with EES experienced lower repeat revascularization rates than patients with ZES at 24 months. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Abstract —Insulin and insulin-like growth factor (IGF) 1 affect coronary vasoactivity. Experimental hypercholesterolemia is associated with coronary atherogenesis and altered vasomotor regulation. Because the IGF axis is altered during atherogenesis, we postulated that experimental hypercholesterolemia is associated with an altered coronary vasoactive response to IGF-1 in vitro. Coronary arteries and arterioles from pigs fed either a normal or high-cholesterol diet for 10 weeks were contracted with endothelin-1 and relaxed with cumulative concentrations of insulin or IGF-1 (10 −12 to 10 −7 mol/L). Control arterioles were also incubated with the nitric oxide synthase inhibitor 10 −4 mol/L N G -monomethyl- l -arginine (L-NMMA) or the potassium channel blocker 10 −2 mol/L tetraethylammonium (TEA), contracted with endothelin-1, and relaxed with insulin or IGF-1. Experimental hypercholesterolemia (1) increased serum cholesterol (9.5±1.0 versus 1.9±0.08 mmol/L; P <0.0001), (2) caused coronary arterial and arteriolar endothelial dysfunction in vitro (attenuated vasorelaxation to bradykinin), (3) did not alter the epicardial response to either insulin ( P =0.80) or IGF-1 ( P =0.12), and (4) significantly attenuated the arteriolar response to IGF-1 (maximal relaxation of 79±6% versus 42±8%; P =0.01) but not insulin (43±6% versus 53±7%; P =0.99). Control arteriolar vasorelaxation to IGF-1 was attenuated by both L-NMMA ( P <0.001) and TEA ( P =0.01), whereas only L-NMMA attenuated insulin ( P <0.001). Staining for IGF-1 and IGF binding protein 2 was increased ( P <0.05) in arterioles of cholesterol-fed pigs. IGF-1 and insulin are therefore coronary arteriolar vasorelaxants through different mechanisms. Experimental hypercholesterolemia is associated with resistance to the coronary arteriolar vasorelaxing effects of IGF-1 but not insulin, in conjunction with increased ligand and binding-protein expression. The IGF axis may contribute to the altered coronary vasoactivity in hypercholesterolemia.

Abstract—Insulin and insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) may play a role in the modulation of coronary artery tone, yet there are few data regarding their vasoactive effects on the coronary vascular bed. We evaluated the vasorelaxation effects of insulin and IGF-I on porcine coronary epicardial vessels in vitro and elucidated possible mechanisms. Porcine epicardial arteries were contracted with 10−7mol/L endothelin-1 and relaxed with cumulative concentrations of either insulin or IGF-I (10−12to 10−7mol/L). The above experiments were repeated in vessels without endothelium. Vessels were also incubated with the nitric oxide synthase inhibitorNG-monomethyl-l-arginine (L-NMMA; 10−4mol/L) with and without 10−3.5mol/Ll-arginine, the potassium channel blocker tetraethylammonium (TEA; 10−2mol/L), and the guanylyl cyclase inhibitor 1H-[1,2,4]oxadiazolo[4,3,-α]quinoxalin-1-one (ODQ; 10−5.5mol/L); vessels were then contracted with endothelin-1 and relaxed with insulin or IGF-I. Insulin and IGF-I were also added after contraction with 60 mmol/L KCl. Insulin and IGF-I caused a similar decrease in coronary epicardial tension after contraction with endothelin-1 (relaxation of 28±4% [n=7] and 25±3% [n=8] with insulin and IGF-I, respectively;P<0.0001 for both peptides). Removal of the endothelium did not affect these responses. Incubation with L-NMMA, but not ODQ, attenuated the vasorelaxation response to insulin and IGF in vessels without endothelium.l-Arginine did not reverse this effect of L-NMMA. KCl and TEA attenuated the vasorelaxation effect of both insulin and IGF-I. Thus, both insulin and IGF-I caused non–endothelium-dependent coronary vasorelaxation in vitro, probably through a mechanism involving the activation of potassium channels. These findings suggest that insulin and IGF-I participate in the regulation of coronary vasomotor tone.

Background —Although 30-day survival is increased in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock who undergo coronary revascularization, the longer-term outcome in such patients and the duration of benefit from revascularization are unknown. Methods and Results —We analyzed 30-day survivors of acute myocardial infarction in the Global Utilization of Streptokinase and Tissue-Plasminogen Activator for Occluded Coronary Arteries (GUSTO-I) trial and identified 36 333 who had not had cardiogenic shock (systolic blood pressure <90 mm Hg for ≥1 hour, group 1) and 1321 patients who had shock (group 2). Group 2 patients were older and sicker. At 1 year, 97.4% of group 1 patients were alive versus 88.0% of group 2 ( P =0.0001). Among group 2 patients, 578 (44%) had undergone revascularization within 30 days (group 2A) and 728 (56%) had not (group 2B). Revascularization was not required by protocol but was selected by the attending physicians. At 1 year, 91.7% of group 2A patients were alive versus 85.3% of group 2B ( P =0.0003). With the use of multivariable logistic regression analysis to adjust for differences in baseline characteristics of shock patients alive at 30 days, revascularization within 30 days was independently associated with reduced 1-year mortality (odds ratio 0.6, [95% confidence interval 0.4, 0.9], P =0.007). Conclusions —Most patients (88%) with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock who are alive at 30 days survived at least 1 year. Shock patients who underwent revascularization within 30 days had improved survival at 1 year compared with shock patients who did not receive revascularization, even after adjustment for differences in baseline characteristics between the 2 groups.