Citations

Abstract Background. Locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) and inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) remain difficult challenges despite progress in multimodality treatment. The SWOG trial S0800 (clinicaltrial.gov NCT00856492) compared bevacizumab in combination with weekly nab-paclitaxel followed by dose-dense AC to nab-paclitaxel followed or preceded by AC as neoadjuvant treatment for HER2-negative IBC/LABC. The rationale was based on the proposed role of angiogenesis, potential role of improved flow and oxygenation in enhancing the delivery of chemotherapy agents, and the proapoptotic effect with certain chemotherapeutic agents, particularly taxanes. Methods. This was a randomized open-label Phase II trial with an accrual goal of 200 patients equally allocated to either bevacizumab (Arm 1) or no bevacizumab.Two patients were ineligible and five withdrew consent leaving 208 for analysis. The no bevacizumab group was further randomized to two sequences (Arm 2: nab-paclitaxel - AC+PEG-G versus Arm 3: AC+PEG-G- nab-paclitaxel) with 50 patients expected in each sequence. The primary endpoint of this study was pathologic complete response (pCR) defined as no evidence of invasive tumor at the primary site and axillary lymph nodes in the surgical specimen. The power for the primary comparison of bevacizumab (bev) versus no bevacizumab (no bev) ignoring sequence was 80% with a 1-sided α = 0.10. Randomization was stratified by hormone receptor status and type of disease (IBC or LABC). Results 215 patients were accrued May 2010 - September 2012. Most had LABC (88%) versus IBC (12%) and most tumors were hormone-receptor (HR) positive (67%). Fourteen (7%) patients had no definitive surgery (included as no pCR); 135 (65%) had residual disease (no pCR) and 59 (28%) had pCR. The bevacizumab pCR rate was higher (35/96; 38%) than that in the non-bevacizumab arms (24/112; 21%) (exact p=0.021; stratified p=0.015). In HR-positive disease there was slight improvement that was not statistically significant (bev 25% vs. non-bev 18%; p=0.41) while the difference was larger in HR-negative disease (bev 59% vs. non-bev 28%; p=0.014). In LABC the overall pCR rate was 29% with a higher rate in the bevacizumab patients (37% vs. 22%; p=0.035). For IBC there was improvement (30% vs. 14%), but not statistically significant (p=0.61) in a small sample. Overall, Grade 3 and 4 events were common in both (bev 67%; non-bev 65%), but did not differ by treatment. There were 21 deaths with 3-year overall survival (OS) of 87% and 83% for bevacizumab and non-bevacizumab, respectively (log-rank p=0.57). Conclusion Compared with combination anthracycline-taxane neoadjuvant chemotherapy, the Bev-Nab-paclitaxel-AC regimen significantly improved pCR rate overall, primarily for triple negative (TNBC) patients. This neoadjuvant regimen could be a good choice for TNBC/IBC . The observed pCR rate in ER negative disease (59%) suggests that the addition of bevacizumab to a standard chemotherapy backbone may improve outcome in this subset, and justifies further testing of such an approach. Correlative science studies to further delineate the biology of TNBC and the effects of bevacizumab are ongoing. Citation Format: Zeina A Nahleh, William E Barlow, Daniel F Hayes, Anne F Schott, Julie R Gralow, Edith A Perez, William M Sikov, Sudhathi Chennuru, Hamid Mirshahidi, Sarah Vidito, Danika L Lew, Lajos Pusztai, Robert B Livingston, Gabriel N Hortobagyi. S0800: Nab-paclitaxel, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, and pegfilgrastim with or without bevacizumab in treating women with inflammatory or locally advanced breast cancer (NCI CDR0000636131) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Seventh Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2014 Dec 9-13; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(9 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-11-16.

SummaryThe cardiac effects of hypercalcaemia are usually manifest as a shortening of the QT-interval. Hypercalcaemia is infrequently associated with a clinically manifest arrhythmia. However, concomitant therapy with digoxin or underlying cardiac disease can potentiate the arrhythmogenic effects of hypercalcaemia, leading to a symptomatic rhythm disorder. We describe a symptomatic arrhythmia, which developed in a patient with hypercalcaemia secondary to squamous cell carcinoma of the bronchus. The patient was on digoxin therapy at the time. The arrhythmia did not recur after discontinuation of digoxin therapy and correction of the hypercalcaemia. Because of its effect on cardiac conduction, hypercalcaemia should be considered in the evaluation of any patient with an unexplained bradyarrhythmia. Conversely, patients with hypercalcaemia should discontinue digoxin therapy and be evaluated for the presence of rhythm disorders while receiving appropriate treatment for hypercalcaemia.

Background— Prompt recognition of underlying cardiovascular implantable electronic device (CIED) infection in patients presenting with Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (SAB) is critical for optimal management of these cases. The goal of this study was to identify clinical predictors of CIED infection in patients presenting with SAB and no signs of pocket infection. Methods and Results— All cases of SAB in CIED recipients at Mayo Clinic from 2001 to 2011 were retrospectively reviewed. We identified 131 patients with CIED who presented with SAB and had no clinical signs of device pocket infection. Forty-five (34%) of these patients had underlying CIED infection based on clinical or echocardiographic criteria. The presence of a permanent pacemaker rather than an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (odds ratio, 3.90; 95% confidence interval, 1.65–9.23; P =0.002), >1 device-related procedure (odds ratio, 3.30; 95% confidence interval, 1.23–8.86; P =0.018), and duration of SAB ≥4 days (odds ratio, 5.54; 95% confidence interval, 3.32–13.23; P <0.001) were independently associated with an increased risk of CIED infection in a multivariable model. The area under the receiver operating characteristics curve for the multivariable model was 0.79, indicating a good discriminatory capacity to distinguish SAB patients with and without CIED infection. Conclusions— Among patients presenting with SAB and no signs of pocket infection, the risk of underlying CIED infection can be calculated based on the type of device, number of device-related procedures, and duration of SAB. We propose that patients without any of these high-risk features have a low risk of underlying CIED infection and may be monitored closely without immediate device extraction. Prospective studies are needed to validate this risk prediction model.

Background— Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is a nonatherosclerotic acute coronary syndrome for which optimal management remains undefined. Methods and Results— We performed a retrospective study of 189 patients presenting with a first SCAD episode. We evaluated outcomes according to initial management: (1) revascularization versus conservative therapy and (2) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) versus conservative therapy stratified by vessel flow at presentation. Demographics were similar in revascularization versus conservative (mean age, 44±9 years; women 92% both groups), but vessel occlusion was more frequent in revascularization (44/95 versus 18/94). There was 1 in-hospital death (revascularization) and 1 late death (conservative). Procedural failure rate was 53% in those managed with PCI. In the subgroup of patients presenting with preserved vessel flow, rates of PCI failure were similarly high (50%), and 6 (13%) required emergency coronary artery bypass grafting. In the conservative group, 85 of 94 (90%) had an uneventful in-hospital course, but 9 (10%) experienced early SCAD progression requiring revascularization. Kaplan–Meier estimated 5-year rates of target vessel revascularization and recurrent SCAD were no different in revascularization versus conservative therapy (30% versus 19%; P =0.06 and 23% versus 31%; P =0.7). Conclusions— PCI for SCAD is associated with high rates of technical failure even in those presenting with preserved vessel flow and does not protect against target vessel revascularization or recurrent SCAD. A strategy of conservative management with prolonged observation may be preferable.

Femoral ExtractionLaser and radiofrequency energy–assisted lead extraction has greatly facilitated this complex procedure. Although success rates are high, in some instances alternate methods of extraction are required. In this review, we discuss techniques for femoral extraction of implanted leads and retained fragments. The major tools available, including commonly used snares and delivery tools, are discussed. We briefly describe combined internal jugular and femoral venous extraction approaches, as well as complimentary utilization of more than one technique via the femoral vein. Animated and procedural sequences are included to help the reader visualize the key components of these techniques.