Citations

Clear

395 citation(s) found for "Cha, Y".

Oversensing of transthoracic excitation stimuli in contemporary pacemakers
Ryan, J. , Tempel, Nathan D., Engle, Dean D., Hayes, David L. , Cha, Yong‐Mei , Asirvatham, Samuel J. , Ryan, James D , Asirvatham, Samuel J

Mayo Clinic

Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology | January 10, 2018 | Volume: 41 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 161-166

10.1111/pace.13269 | PMID 29315719 Get It

AbstractBackgroundTransthoracic impedance measurements (TIM) is primarily used for minute ventilation rate adaptive sensors in pacemakers. With elevated impedance, the TIM electrical signal itself is oversensed, causing device malfunction.ObjectiveWe report an increased incidence of TIM oversensing.MethodRetrospective chart review. We review existing records of 18 patients who have demonstrated device malfunction with TIM oversensing.ResultsWe have found a 1.8% incidence of TIM‐related oversensing in our patient population of 959 patients with contemporary Boston Scientific (Marlborough, MA, USA) pacemakers and cardiac resynchronization therapy pacemakers. One patient experienced a syncopal episode.ConclusionOversensing with pacing inhibition is apparent with the potential of adverse effects to patients.
Mortality and Cerebrovascular Events After Heart Rhythm Disorder Management Procedures
Lee, Justin Z. , Ling, Jayna, Diehl, Nancy N. , Hodge, David O. , Padmanabhan, Deepak , Killu, Ammar M. , Madhavan, Malini , Cha, Yong‐Mei , Deshmukh, Abhishek , Shen, Win-Kuang, Friedman, Paul A. , Munger, Thomas M. , Asirvatham, Samuel J. , Packer, Douglas L. , Mulpuru, Siva K. , Kapa, Suraj , Asirvatham, Samuel J , Noseworthy, Peter A. , McLeod, Christopher J. , Srivathsan, Komandoor , Kusumoto, Fred

Mayo Clinic

Circulation | October 18, 2017 | Volume: 137 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 24-33

10.1161/circulationaha.117.030523 | PMID 29046320 Get It

Background: Recognition of rates and causes of hard, patient-centered outcomes of death and cerebrovascular events (CVEs) after heart rhythm disorder management (HRDM) procedures is an essential step for the development of quality improvement programs in electrophysiology laboratories. Our primary aim was to assess and characterize death and CVEs (stroke or transient ischemic attack) after HRDM procedures over a 17-year period. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of all patients undergoing HRDM procedures between January 2000 and November 2016 at the Mayo Clinic. Patients from all 3 tertiary academic centers (Rochester, Phoenix, and Jacksonville) were included in the study. All in-hospital deaths and CVEs after HRDM procedures were identified and were further characterized as directly or indirectly related to the HRDM procedure. Subgroup analysis of death and CVE rates was performed for ablation, device implantation, electrophysiology study, lead extraction, and defibrillation threshold testing procedures. Results: A total of 48 913 patients (age, 65.7±6.6 years; 64% male) who underwent a total of 62 065 HRDM procedures were included in the study. The overall mortality and CVE rates in the cohort were 0.36% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.31–0.42) and 0.12% (95% CI, 0.09–0.16), respectively. Patients undergoing lead extraction had the highest overall mortality rate at 1.9% (95% CI, 1.34–2.61) and CVE rate at 0.62% (95% CI, 0.32–1.07). Among patients undergoing HRDM procedures, 48% of deaths directly related to the HDRM procedure were among patients undergoing device implantation procedures. Overall, cardiac tamponade was the most frequent direct cause of death (40%), and infection was the most common indirect cause of death (29%). The overall 30-day mortality rate was 0.76%, with the highest being in lead extraction procedures (3.08%), followed by device implantation procedures (0.94%). Conclusions: Half of the deaths directly related to an HRDM procedure were among the patients undergoing device implantation procedures, with cardiac tamponade being the most common cause of death. This highlights the importance of the development of protocols for the quick identification and management of cardiac tamponade even in procedures typically believed to be lower risk such as device implantation.
PET/MRI: Where might it replace PET/CT?
Ehman, Eric C. , Johnson, Geoffrey B. , Leynes, Andrew P. , Johnson, Geoffrey B , Villanueva-Meyer, Javier E. , Cha, Soonmee , Larson, Peder E. Z. , Hope, Thomas A.

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging | October 13, 2017 | Volume: 46 | Issue: 5 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/jmri.25872 Get It

Super-response to cardiac resynchronization therapy reduces appropriate implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy
Killu, Ammar M. , Mazo, Anna, Grupper, Avishay , Madhavan, Malini , Webster, Tracy L., Brooke, Kelly L., Hodge, David O. , Asirvatham, Samuel J. , Friedman, Paul A. , Glikson, Michael , Cha, Yong‐Mei , Webster, Tracy, Asirvatham, Samuel J , Glikson, Michael

Mayo Clinic

EP Europace | August 4, 2017 | Volume: 20 | Issue: 8 | Pages: 1303-1311

10.1093/europace/eux235 | PMID 29016821 Get It

Abstract 778: Identifying, subtyping and classifying tumor associated circulating endothelial cells in patients with solid tumors
Alpaugh, R. Katherine , Martin, Stuart S. , Chumsri, S, Tang, Cha‐Mei , Adams, Daniel L. , Lin, Steven H. , Marks, Jeffrey R. , Bergan, Raymond C. , Cristofanilli, Massimo , Stefansson, Steingrimur

Mayo Clinic

Cancer Research | July 31, 2017 | Volume: 77 | Issue: 13_Supplement | Pages: 778-778

10.1158/1538-7445.am2017-778 Get It

Abstract Background: Tumor endothelial cells (ECs) are a population of stromal cells required for tumor growth that cooperate with tumors to form angiogenic structures. In blood, circulating ECs (CECs) are normal constituents of healthy individuals, although a Cancer Associated Vascular Endothelial cell (CAVE) subtype has been observed in cancer patients. The CAVE population has been isolated and identified using their large size or multicellular clustering and a pooled mixture of classical EC markers (i.e. CD31 and CD146). However, there has been no attempt to differentiate CAVEs from the many EC subtypes. This is not surprising as in-depth phenotyping of ECs requires an array of biomarkers that until recently has not been feasible. A multi-phenotypic screening of EC markers was tested on CAVEs from 116 blood samples in 3 types of solid tumors. This data suggests that CAVEs exist as a common and diverse subtype of tumor derived CECs that may express cytokeratin (CK) and various EC biomarkers, correlating to disease stage. Methods: Peripheral blood samples from 116 cancer patients (stage I-IV) were drawn from 2012-2014 including breast (n=42), lung (n=39) and prostate (n=35), as well as blood from 34 healthy controls. Blood was processed by an established filtration approach, i.e. the CellSieveTM microfiltration technique (Creatv MicroTech), filtering blood by size exclusion and staining cells for CK 8, 18 & 19, EpCAM and CD45. After identification and imaging, the QUAS-R (Quench, Underivatize, Amine-Strip and Restain) technique was used to remove fluorescence signal and restain all cells with CD31, CD146, CD144, & DAPI. After reimaging, QUAS-R was again used to remove fluorescence and restain the cells for CD14, CD105, CD34, & DAPI. Results: Out of 116 patient samples, we identified CAVEs in 63 patients (54%) based on positivity of CD31, CD144 or CD146, but none were found in healthy controls. CAVEs per 7.5mL sample in patients averaged 5.1 (breast), 5.6 (prostate) and 7.9 (lung). Presence of CAVEs appeared related to stage with 26% in stage 1, 61% in stage 2, 68% in stage 3, and 74% in stage 4 patients. No CAVEs were positive for CD14 or CD45. CD31 was the most present marker, found on 93% of CAVEs, followed by CD144 (85%), CD34 (64%), CD146 (45%), & CD105 (4%). In contrast with the previous study on this topic, CK was found in 67% of CAVEs, but was not a universal marker. Conclusions: It has been reported that CK+ and CD45- CECs are isolated from the blood of cancer patients in colon and lung cancers, prompting some to classify them as circulating tumor cells. However, subtyping these CECs is incomplete when characterized with only 3-4 biomarkers. A multi-phenotypic subtyping technique was used to properly identify and subtype these CECs in cancer patients. This data suggest that a subset of CECs, e.g. CAVEs, are found in circulation as CK+/CD45-, but exist as a heterogeneous population of cancer specific circulating cells that require further study. Citation Format: Daniel L. Adams, R. Katherine Alpaugh, Steven H. Lin, Jeffrey R. Marks, Raymond Bergan, Stuart S. Martin, Sarany Chumsri, Massimo Cristofanilli, Cha-Mei Tang, Steingrimur Stefansson. Identifying, subtyping and classifying tumor associated circulating endothelial cells in patients with solid tumors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2017; 2017 Apr 1-5; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 778. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-778
Abstract 3798: Multiplex phenotyping of circulating cancer associated macrophage-like cells in patients with solid tumors
Alpaugh, R. Katherine , Martin, Stuart S. , Chumsri, Saranya , Tang, Cha‐Mei , Adams, Daniel L. , Ho, Thai H. , Lin, Steven H. , Marks, Jeffrey R. , Bergan, Raymond C. , Cristofanilli, Massimo

Mayo Clinic

Cancer Research | July 31, 2017 | Volume: 77 | Issue: 13_Supplement | Pages: 3798-3798

10.1158/1538-7445.am2017-3798 Get It

Abstract Background: Circulating cancer associated macrophage-like cells (CAMLs) are cancer specific giant cells circulating in the blood of patients with solid tumors. Since their discovery, few studies have been done to elucidate their lineage or phenotypic identity. The difficulty in classifying CAMLs is exemplified by their expression of multiple heterogeneous markers that defy conventional identification. Recently, we described a restaining method (QUAS-R) to screen individual cells using an array of up to 15 biomarkers. We used this method to screen CAMLs isolated from 152 cancer patient samples in 4 types of solid tumors to classify CAMLs by phenotypic immunostaining. These data suggest that CAMLs are a morphologically diverse and phenotypically heterogeneous population of cancer specific giant cells with overlapping myeloid, epithelial, and endothelial phenotypes. Methods: This multi-institutional study used peripheral blood samples from 152 cancer patients (stage I-IV) from breast (n=42), lung (n=39), renal cell carcinoma (36) and prostate (n=35). Blood was processed by the CellSieve™ microfiltration technique at 5 institutions and stained for cytokeratin 8, 18 & 19, EpCAM, and CD45. After identification/imaging, the QUAS-R (Quench, Underivatize, Amine-Strip and Restain) technique was used to quench fluorescence signal of cells and then restain with vimentin/CD146/CD144, CD14/CD11b/CD41, CD11c/CD68/TIE2, or CD34/CD41/CD61. After staining, QUAS-R was again used to remove the fluorescence and samples restained with a third panel. Each patient sample was stained, quenched and restained with the above mentioned panels. Results: In agreement with a number of studies, CAMLs were found in 86% of cancer patients (n=131/152), with increased detection from stage 1 (71%), followed by stage 2 (94%), stage 3 (88%) to stage 4 (88%). Breast cancer had the most CAMLs per sample (14.1 cells/7.5mL), followed by prostate (6.8), renal cell carcinoma (4.9) and lung (3.2). CD34 was most prevalent, found on 88% of CAMLs, followed by cytokeratin (81%), CD41 (79%), CD61 (78%), CD45 (75%), CD14 (72%), vimentin (63%), EpCAM (56%), CD146 (53%), CD68 (44%), CD11c (38%), TIE-2 (25%) and CD11b (0%). Based on our results, CAMLs seem to express overlapping phenotypes from a variety of lineages i.e. macrophage (CD14/CD68/CD11c), epithelial (cytokeratin/EpCAM), endothelial (CD146/TIE-2) and megakaryocyte (CD41/CD61). Conclusions: Although identification of CAMLs is straightforward by morphological criteria (size and nuclear profile), their identification and lineage remains undetermined. We report the first mass screening of CAMLs to determine phenotypic expression. These data suggest that CAMLs cannot be grouped into any known cell subtype based on their expression profiles and represent a heterogeneous and variably differentiated population whose biological consequences in cancer remain under investigation. Citation Format: Daniel L. Adams, R Katherine Alpaugh, Thai H. Ho, Steven H. Lin, Jeffrey R. Marks, Raymond Bergan, Stuart S. Martin, Saranya Chumsri, Cha-Mei Tang, Massimo Cristofanilli. Multiplex phenotyping of circulating cancer associated macrophage-like cells in patients with solid tumors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2017; 2017 Apr 1-5; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 3798. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-3798
Left Ventricular Septal Hypertrophy in Elderly Patients With Aortic Stenosis
Katayama, Minako , Panse, Prasad M., Kendall, Christopher B., Daniels, John R., Cha, Stephen S., Fortuin, F. David , Sweeney, John P., DeValeria, Patrick A. , Lanza, Louis A., Bëlohlávek, Marek , Chaliki, Hari P. , Cha, Stephen S.

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine | July 25, 2017 | Volume: 37 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 217-224

10.1002/jum.14320 | PMID 28741721 Get It

ObjectivesLeft ventricular (LV) septal hypertrophy in aortic stenosis raises diagnostic and therapeutic questions. However, the etiology and clinical consequences of this finding have not been well studied. The aim of this study was to perform a morphologic evaluation of the LV in aortic stenosis and to investigate the contributing factors and consequences of septal hypertrophy.MethodsPatients with moderate or severe aortic stenosis were prospectively enrolled. Patients with previous myocardial infarction, wall motion abnormalities, at least moderate valvular regurgitation, known cardiomyopathy, an LV ejection fraction of less than 50%, and age younger than 65 years were excluded.ResultsForty‐one patients underwent a final analysis. Septal hypertrophy (LV septal wall thickness ≥15 mm) was confirmed in 21 of 41 patients. The septal hypertrophy group had higher peak aortic valve velocity, a higher diabetes mellitus rate, and a higher rate and longer duration of hypertension than those without septal hypertrophy. The peak aortic valve velocity (odds ratio, 7.1; 95% confidence interval, 1.4–37.1) and diabetes mellitus (odds ratio, 7.4; 95% confidence interval, 1.2–46.2) were the significant factors associated with septal hypertrophy by multivariate analysis. Intraventricular conduction disturbance on electrocardiography was more frequent in the septal hypertrophy group (P = .021).ConclusionsLeft ventricular septal hypertrophy was commonly observed in elderly patients with aortic stenosis, and a higher aortic valve velocity, hypertension, and diabetes mellitus were associated factors. Intraventricular conduction disturbance occurred more often in patients with septal hypertrophy than those without, which implies the pathophysiologic consequence. Further studies are needed to determine the impact of septal hypertrophy and intraventricular conduction disturbance on the prognosis of patients after aortic valve interventions.
Right ventricular pacemaker lead position is associated with differences in long‐term outcomes and complications
Witt, Chance M. , Lenz, Charles J., Shih, Henry, Ebrille, Elisa , Rosenbaum, Andrew , Zyl, Martin van , Aung, Htin , Manocha, Kevin K. , Deshmukh, Abhishek , Hodge, David O. , Mulpuru, Siva K. , Cha, Yong‐Mei , Espinosa, Raúl E. , Asirvatham, Samuel J. , McLeod, Christopher J. , Asirvatham, Samuel J

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology | May 25, 2017 | Volume: 28 | Issue: 8 | Pages: 924-930

10.1111/jce.13256 | PMID 28543771 Get It

AbstractIntroductionCardiac pacing from the right ventricular apex is associated with detrimental long‐term effects and nonapical pacing locations may be associated with improved outcomes. There is little data regarding complications with nonapical lead positions. The aim of this study was to assess long‐term outcomes and lead‐related complications associated with differing ventricular lead tip position.Methods and resultsAll adult patients who underwent dual‐chamber pacemaker implantation from 2004 to 2014 were included if they had postprocedure chest radiographs amenable to lead position determination. Long‐term outcomes and lead‐related complication rates were recorded. These were compared at 5 years between: (1) apical and septal leads, (2) apical and nonseptal nonapical (NSNA), and (3) apical and septal with >40% ventricular pacing. We retrospectively evaluated 3,450 patients, which included 238 with a septal position and 733 with NSNA lead positions. Septal lead position was associated with a lower mortality compared to apical leads (24% vs. 31%, P = 0.02). In patients with greater than 40% pacing, septal leads were associated with significantly higher rates of incident atrial fibrillation compared to apical leads (49% vs. 34%, P = 0.04). NSNA positions were associated with a significantly higher rate of lead dislodgement (4% vs. 2%, P = 0.005) and need for revision (8% vs. 5%, P = 0.005).ConclusionsSeptal pacemaker lead position is associated with a lower mortality compared to apically placed leads, but a higher incidence of atrial fibrillation with higher percentage ventricular pacing. NSNA lead locations are associated with more complications and should be avoided.
C5 Palsy After Cervical Spine Surgery: A Multicenter Retrospective Review of 59 Cases
Thompson, Sara E., Smith, Zachary A. , Hsu, Wellington K. , Mroz, Thomas E., Fish, David E., Wang, Jeffrey C. , Fehlings, Michael G. , Tannoury, Chadi , Tannoury, Tony , Tortolani, P. Justin, Traynelis, Vincent C. , Gokaslan, Ziya L. , Hilibrand, Alan S. , Isaacs, Robert E., Mummaneni, Praveen V. , Chou, Dean , Qureshi, Sheeraz A. , Cho, Samuel K. , Baird, Evan O., Sasso, Rick C., Buser, Zorica , Bydon, Mohamad , Giacomo, Anthony F. De, Derakhshan, Adeeb , Jobse, Bruce C., Lord, Elizabeth L. , Massicotte, Eric M. , Steinmetz, Michael P. , Smith, Gabriel A. , Pace, Jonathan , Corriveau, Mark, Lee, Sung‐Ho , Cha, Peter I., Chatterjee, Dhananjay, Gee, Erica L., Mayer, Erik N. , McBride, Owen J., Roe, Allison K. , Yanez, Marisa Y., Stroh, D. Alex, Than, Khoi D. , Nassr, Ahmad , Mroz, Thomas E. , Arnold, Paul M. , Clarke, Michelle J. , Lubelski, Daniel , Cha, Peter I., Riew, Kiehyun Daniel , Fehlings, Michael G , Tannoury, Chadi

Mayo Clinic

Global Spine Journal | April 19, 2017 | Volume: 7 | Issue: 1_suppl | Pages: 64S-70S

10.1177/2192568216688189 | PMID 28451494 Get It

Study Design: A multicenter, retrospective review of C5 palsy after cervical spine surgery. Objective: Postoperative C5 palsy is a known complication of cervical decompressive spinal surgery. The goal of this study was to review the incidence, patient characteristics, and outcome of C5 palsy in patients undergoing cervical spine surgery. Methods: We conducted a multicenter, retrospective review of 13 946 patients across 21 centers who received cervical spine surgery (levels C2 to C7) between January 1, 2005, and December 31, 2011, inclusive. P values were calculated using 2-sample t test for continuous variables and χ 2 tests or Fisher exact tests for categorical variables. Results: Of the 13 946 cases reviewed, 59 patients experienced a postoperative C5 palsy. The incidence rate across the 21 sites ranged from 0% to 2.5%. At most recent follow-up, 32 patients reported complete resolution of symptoms (54.2%), 15 had symptoms resolve with residual effects (25.4%), 10 patients did not recover (17.0%), and 2 were lost to follow-up (3.4%). Conclusion: C5 palsy occurred in all surgical approaches and across a variety of diagnoses. The majority of patients had full recovery or recovery with residual effects. This study represents the largest series of North American patients reviewed to date.