Citations

Abstract Systemic mastocytosis (SM) is a rare hematologic neoplasm characterized by abnormal growth and accumulation of tissue mast cells (MC) in various organ systems, including bone marrow (BM). Indolent and advanced forms of SM have been described. Whereas patients with ISM have a normal or near normal life-expectancy, patients with advanced SM, including those suffering from mast cell leukemia (MCL) have a poor prognosis. In these patients, neoplastic MC are usually resistant against conventional drugs and various targeted drugs. In rapidly progressive aggressive SM (ASM) and MCL, polychemotherapy followed by allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHCT) has been proposed. However, outcome of alloHCT in advanced SM is unknown, and it also remains uncertain whether clinically relevant graft-versus-SM (GVSM) effects may occur in these patients, as only sporadic case reports have been published. We performed a retrospective multi-center analysis to evaluate the outcome of alloHCT in patients with advanced SM. Fifty-four advanced SM patients receiving SCT in 32 transplantation centers in Europe and America were identified between 1990 and 2013. The median patient age was 45 years. Donors were: HLA identical siblings (31), unrelated donors (URD) (15), umbilical cord blood donors (UCB) (2), and haploidentical donors (1). In 5 patients, stem cell source was not defined (5). Thirty-four patients received myeloablative conditioning (MAC) and 18 received reduced intensity conditioning regimens (RIC). In 2 patients, conditioning regimen was not specified. Indications for alloHCT were SM with an associated clonal hematologic non-mast cell lineage disease (SM-AHNMD) (n=32), MCL (n=13, including one with MCL-AHNMD), 8 with ASM and 1 with myelomastocytic leukemia (MML). The most prevalent AHNMD was acute myeloid leukemia (AML, n=16). With follow-up of 35-6180 (median 365) days, SM responses (defined as ≥50% decrease in BM mast cells ± decrease in serum tryptase ± regression of other organ manifestations) were observed in 39 patients (72%), including complete responses (CR) documented in 12 patients (22%). Eleven patients had stable disease, whereas 4 patients (7%) progressed immediately after alloHCT (primary resistance). In addition, 10 patients progressed (5 of them within 100 days) after an initial response. Progression was most frequently seen in MCL patients (n=6, 50%). In the AHNMD group, only 8 patients relapsed/progressed (25%). The overall survival (OS) and SM progression-free survival (PFS) at 1 year were 63% and 50% for all patients, 77% and 68% for SM-AHNMD, 63% and 50% for ASM, and 25% and 17% for MCL, respectively. The strongest predictive variable associated with inferior survival was a diagnosis of MCL. Other factors associated with poor outcome were: Karnofsky performance status ≤70%, ≥2 SM regimens given before alloHCT (e.g., steroids, cladribine, chemotherapy, tyrosine kinase inhibitor), donor source (alternative donors-UCB and haploidentical compared to sibling or URD), SM progression within the first 100 days, normal cytogenetics (compared to t(8;21) (q22;q22), and RIC (compared to MAC). The following variables were not associated with poor outcome: patient and donor age, recipient-donor sex match status, graft source (BM vs. peripheral stem cells), BM mast cell percentage at time of alloHCT, and CR status of AML or SM response at time of alloHCT. This largest multi-center analysis of results in advanced SM provides evidence for clinical efficacy of alloHCT, presumably because of a GVSM effect of alloHCT (achieving CR, and response to donor-lymphocyte infusions and RIC alloHCT). However, responses varied among different SM categories: while patients with SM-AHNMD enjoyed excellent outcomes, the OS for MCL patients in general, was poor. Nevertheless it is remarkable that 3 of 13 patients with MCL – an otherwise fatal disease with a median survival of <12 months – became long-term survivors after alloHCT. In summary, our results support development of a prospective alloHCT study, with the aim to optimize therapy and to improve overall outcome in advanced SM. Based on our pilot study, alloHCT should also be considered in practice for eligible and fit patients with SM-AHNMD (if treatment of AHNMD component needs alloHCT or SM component is aggressive), rapidly progressing ASM, MCL and MML when a suitable HLA-matched sibling donor or URD is available. Disclosures: Vercellotti: Sangart Inc.: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding. Akin:Novartis: Consultancy. Valent:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding.

Abstract Abstract 606 Multiple myeloma is a complex malignancy with multiple underlying genetic events. Our group has spent considerable effort over the last 15 years to elucidate the genetic underpinnings of myeloma. Most recently, we used array-based comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) as a discovery tool in 62 myeloma patients and 46 myeloma cell lines. In that preliminary screen using the Agilent 44B aCGH platform (∼70kb resolution) we identified a diverse array of abnormalities, which resulted in constitutive activation of the NF-kB pathways. That initial analysis concentrated on the 43 genes we identified as potential targets of the 13 homozygous deletion events detected in the patient samples. A pathway analysis of these genes revealed a single pathway involving TRAF3, TRAF2, BIRC2, BIRC3, and CYLD. This first analysis focused exclusively on abnormalities present in the patient samples as we worried some abnormalities identified exclusively in the cell lines might not be relevant to the pathogenesis of myeloma in patients. However, several abnormalities were equally or more frequent overall but occurred exclusively in cell lines including CDKN2C (14 samples), CDKN1B (4 samples), KDM6A/UTX (4 samples), RB1 (3 samples), TP53 (3 samples). Given the fact that KDM6A/UTX deletions were as frequent as many of the best-described tumor suppressors it seemed like a good candidate but in the absence of patient events or a known function at the time it was not prioritized for further study. Recently, as part of the Multiple Myeloma Research Consortium (MMRC) Genomics Initiative, we have completed the analysis of a cohort of 250 myeloma patient samples by aCGH using the Agilent 244A aCGH platform (∼15kb resolution) and gene expression profiling using the Affymetrix U133Plus2.0 genechip. In this cohort with a significantly improved aCGH platform we identified 17 genes that are recurrently inactivated by homozygous deletions including DIAPH2 (15 samples), CDKN2C (14 samples), TRAF3 (11 samples), CYLD (8 samples), BIRC2/3 (7 samples), KDM6A/UTX (6 samples), and RB1 (5 samples). Based on the significant improvement in resolution and data quality achieved with the Agilent 244A aCGH platform we rescreen all of the cell lines on this improved platform. This significantly changed the frequency of several homozygous deletions in this population with the most frequently targeted genes now being CDKN2C (20 samples), KDM6A/UTX (13 samples), DIAPH2 (7 samples), RB1 (4 samples), TP53 (4 samples), CDKN1B (4 samples), and TRAF3 (4 samples). Moreover, as part of the genomic characterization of a spontaneous myeloma mouse model that we have developed, Vk*-Myc, we have identified recurrent (∼50%) homozygous deletions of Kdm6a/Utx. Therefore, one of the genes most commonly targeted by a homozygous deletion in human and mouse myeloma is KDM6A/UTX. In late 2007 after we had identified the first patients with KDM6A/UTX deletions it was shown that UTX is a functional histone demethylase that removes methyl groups from histone H3 lysine 27 (H3K27me). Given the high incidence of deletions and the fact that MMSET, the overexpressed target gene of t(4;14) in myeloma, is predicted to methylate H3K27, H3K36, and/or H4K20 by evolutionary conservation we developed the hypothesis that myeloma is characterized by abnormalities that result in excessive H3K27me (typically a repressive chromatin mark). Given the extensive whole genome sequencing occurring in the MMRC genomics initiative we elected to focus our resequencing efforts on the cell lines exclusively. These studies identified an additional 4 samples with LOH and an inactivating mutation bringing the total percentage of inactivated cell lines to 33%. Clearly, in the expanded patient and cell line cohorts the inactivation of KDM6A/UTX is not independent of MMSET overexpression suggesting they may act independently or synergistically. We are currently attempting to identify the genes controlled by KDM6A/UTX inactivation to better understand the functional consequences of this highly recurrent event. However, in the mouse model unlike the patient or cell lines, the gene expression profiling has identified a gene expression signature that differentiates UTX inactivated and functional samples suggesting an oncogenic function of inactivation. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract Abstract 53 Prior studies have demonstrated a graft-versus-malignancy effect following allogeneic HSCT that is variably linked to acute or chronic GVHD. Although a graft vs. Myeloma (MM) effect has been shown after myeloablative allogeneic HSCT, a higher treatment related mortality (TRM) risk leads to inferior survival compared with autologous HSCT. Non-myeloablative (NMA) and reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) approaches are used to reduce the risk of TRM while preserving the graft vs. MM effect. The clinical benefit of lower intensity conditioning regimens is thus especially dependent on the impact of acute or chronic GVHD on graft vs. MM effect and TRM. We analyzed the outcomes of 177 matched sibling allogeneic HSCT recipients reported to the CIBMTR between 1997 and 2005 following NMA (n=120) or RIC (n=57) performed within 18 months of diagnosis. Median age was 50 (range 24-69) years and 62% were Durie-Salmon Stage III. Tandem autologous followed by allogeneic HSCT (autologous+ allogeneic) recipients (n=105) were more likely to receive NMA conditioning vs. recipients of an upfront allogeneic HSCT (n=72). Majority (98%) received peripheral blood stem cell grafts. Outcomes at a median follow-up of 36 (3 - 98) months are summarized in table 1. In order to assess the impact of GVHD on outcomes, Cox proportional hazards regression models were built with GVHD as the main effect treating it as a time dependent covariate (Table 2). Other covariates in the multivariate models included age, sex, performance status, IgG vs. non IgG myeloma, disease status and chemosensitivity, prior lines of chemotherapy, donor-recipient sex match, NMA vs. RIC and year of transplant. AGVHD was associated with an increased risk of TRM. Tandem autologous + allogeneic HSCT was associated with reduced relapse risk (RR= 0.49, p=0.008). AGVHD had no impact on relapse/progression of MM while cGVHD was associated with a reduced risk of relapse (Figure. 1). The protective effect of cGVHD on relapse was significant in the non IgG MM subgroup. AGVHD had no impact on PFS whereas cGVHD was associated with superior PFS and lower risk of treatment failure. Later year of HSCT was also associated with superior PFS. Overall survival was not affected by cGVHD while recipients of tandem autologous + allogeneic HSCT had a higher mortality in the presence of aGVHD (RR=3.60, p= 0.01). After matched sibling allogeneic HSCT for MM, aGVHD is associated with a higher risk of TRM whereas cGVHD decreases the risk of relapse and improves PFS. The effect of cGVHD may vary with the type of MM with greater impact in non IgG MM. Further study to identify subtypes of MM susceptible to an immune mediated graft vs. MM effect is suggested. Disclosures: Lonial: Celgene: Consultancy; Millennium: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Gloucester: Research Funding.

Abstract Abstract 3605 CLL is a malignant B-cell disorder characterized by the accumulation of small B lymphocytes with a mature appearance in blood, marrow and lymph nodes. Despite effective treatment options, all patients with CLL will eventually relapse after therapy. This could be due in part to the presence of subclones of the CLL cell population that harbor genetic abnormalities, which confer resistance to treatment. The aims of this study were to investigate the clonal evolution in longitudinal samples of CLL patients and to identify genetic alterations associated with disease progression and resistance to therapy. Sequential analyses were performed in 51 samples from 23 patients who were included in a previously reported clinical trial of pentostatin, cyclophosphamide and rituximab (PCR) given every 3 weeks for 6 cycles in previously untreated CLL (Blood 109:2007). In all cases the first sample analyzed was prior to therapy. In 5 of 23 patients, three time points were analyzed: >6 months prior to entry onto PCR trial (time point A), just before starting with the PCR regimen (time point B), and the time of relapse after PCR trial (time point C). Seven patients were analyzed at time points A and B; 9 at time points B and C and 2 at time points A and C. The median time between points A and B was 17.5 months (range 8–48 months) and between points B and C was 20.5 months (7–60 m). All samples were examined by array-based comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) using the Agilent Sureprint G3 (1 million probe) array. aCGH findings were confirmed by interphase FISH using probes for D13S319 (MIR16–1/MIR15A), RB1, MDM2, CEP12, CEP6, MYB, TP53, NFKBIA, PERP and FGFR1 loci. Overall, we observed a small increase in the number of copy-number abnormalities (CNA) with disease progression. Twenty-two of the 23 patients with paired samples harbored at least one CNA that persisted in all samples, indicating clonal relationship between the sequential samples. In 15 of the 23 patients the tumor clone was stable and no CNA differences between time points were identified. Conversely, genomic evolution was found in 8 patients. In 3 cases the genetic differences were observed pre treatment (between time points A and B) and in the other 5 cases, the observed changes were found after therapy (between time points A and C or between B and C). One remarkable case with genome evolution exhibited two subclones sharing trisomies 12 and 19, but with several unique CNA confined to each subclone. The first subclone was characterized by deletions of 6q, RB1, MIR16-1/MIR15A and 3 other losses, while the second subclone showed homozygous deletion of MIR16–1/MIR15A and 5 other monoallelic deletions. The first subclone was predominant at time points A and B (60–70% of cells), but was present in only 10–20% of cells at time point C as confirmed by FISH. Conversely, the second subclone was observed in ~20% of cells at time points A and B and became predominant after therapy, found in ~80% of cells at time point C. Another case was characterized by deletion 11q32 (including ATM and others) as the sole abnormality at time point B. Significant genomic complexity was observed at time point C, including deletions of 11q32, 9p21 (CDKN2A), 9q12-q33, 14q13.2 (NFKBIA) and 17p (TP53), and gains of 2p16 (REL) and 9q34. Interestingly, the deletion 11q32 from both time points arose independently at each time point, as they exhibited different chromosomal breakpoints and copy number variants. Moreover, the other CNA found at relapse were not identified at diagnosis (confirmed by aCGH and FISH). For evolution of specific CNA, trisomy 12 was found in 5 cases at the first sample analyzed and was stable with no changes between time points. The frequency of deletions 13q14.3 (MIR16-1/MIR15A) and 17p increased at the later time points. Conversely, –6q decreased in frequency across time points (3 cases in time points A–B and 1 case in time point C). In summary, at least 35% of CLL patients exhibited clonal evolution and at least 9% showed evidence of multiple subclones. This subgroup of CLL patients provides an exceptional framework for comprehensive analysis of genome evolution during disease progression before and after therapy. Our observations also support the hypothesis of a common CLL progenitor cell can give rise to clonally related, but genetically evolving subpopulations of tumor cells. Finally, this study may bring novel information regarding the drug resistance pathways utilized by CLL B cell clones post therapy. Disclosures: Kipps: GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Research Funding; Genzyme: Research Funding; Memgen: Research Funding; Igenica: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi Aventis: Research Funding; Abbott Laboratories: Research Funding. Fonseca:Genzyme: Consultancy; Medtronic: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; AMGEN: Consultancy; Otsuka: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Intellikine: Consultancy; Cylene: Research Funding; Onyx: Research Funding; FISH probes prognostication in myeloma: Patents & Royalties.

Abstract Introduction: Anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CART19) and bi-specific anti-CD19/CD3 antibodies (blinatumomab) generate unprecedented complete response rates of 45-90% in relapsing/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia (r/r B-ALL). However, a subset of patients treated with these targeted approaches will relapse and a significant portion of these relapses are characterized by the loss of detectable CD19 (about 30% of relapses after blinatumomab and up to 50% after CART19), a clear manifestation of immunoediting. Hence, novel effective strategies are needed in order to be able to treat those patients and ideally prevent antigen-loss. CD123, the interleukin-3 receptor alpha, is involved in hematopoiesis and has been shown to be expressed in several hematologic neoplasms, including acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and more recently also B-ALL. Targeting CD123 with chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CART123) was shown to lead to deep and long-term responses in human primary AML xenografts. The goal of this study was to pre-clinically evaluate the impact of targeting CD123 and CD19 with chimeric antigen receptor T cells for the treatment and prevention of CD19-negative leukemia relapses occurring after CD19-directed therapies. Results: We analyzed the expression of CD123 in 42 r/r B-ALL samples and found that CD123 is highly and homogeneously expressed on the surface of most B-ALL blasts (81.75%, range: 5.1-99.6), making it a promising candidate for targeted therapy in B-ALL. Moreover, CD123 was also found to be expressed in the putative leukemia stem cells (LSC), identified as CD34-pos CD38-neg. Notably, in some Ph+ B-ALL samples we found CD19-ve CD123+ve cells with a BCR-ABL translocation by FISH, suggesting that these cells too are malignant. The expression of CD123 was detected in all (n=6) CD19-negative B-ALL blasts analyzed after relapse from CART19 treatment (Figure 1). These findings indicate that CD123 represents an ideal marker to target CD19-neg ALL blasts occurring after CART19 or blinatumomab. Therefore, we generated anti-CD123 chimeric antigen receptor T cells costimulated with 4-1-BB using a lentiviral vector (CART123). We then evaluated the CART123 anti-B-ALL efficacy both in vitro and in vivo against primary B-ALL and cell line (NALM-6). CART123 showed intense anti-B-ALL ex vivo activity, as defined by specific CD107a degranulation, cytokine production, cytotoxicity and proliferation, not statistically different from that of CART19. In order to test the role of CART123 to target CD19-negative relapses we developed a novel in vivo model, engrafting immunodeficient NSG mice with blasts obtained from a patient relapsing with CD19-ve disease after CART19 treatment. At day 14 mice were randomized to receive CART19, CART123 or control T cells (untransduced, UTD). CART19 and control T cell treated mice had no anti-tumor activity, while CART123 led to complete eradication of the disease and long-term survival. We next developed a murine model to test the hypothesis that a combined approach simultaneously targeting CD123 and CD19 could treat and prevent CD19-negative relapses. NSG mice were injected with a mixture of primary CD19-neg and CD19-pos blasts from the same patient that were labeled with different click beetle luciferases (red or green) in order to be able to track the respective clones in vivo. Mice were then randomized to receive UTD, CART19 or the combination of CART19 and CART123 (same total dose of T cells). As shown in Figure 2, mice treated with UTD had progression of both leukemic clones (CD19-pos and CD19-neg) while CART19 showed rapid progression mostly of the CD19-neg disease (red luciferase); on the contrary only mice treated with the combination of CART123 and CART19 showed rapid clearance of the disease, with improved overall survival (64 days for CART19, not reached for CART19+CART123). As a final strategy, we expressed both CAR19 and CAR123 in the same T cells and showed potent anti-leukemia activity (CD107a degranulation 81.7%). Conclusions: Here we demonstrate that CD123 is expressed in CD19-negative B-ALL relapses occurring after CD19-directed therapies, and that combining CART123 cells with CART19 cells is an effective therapy for the treatment and prevention of antigen-loss relapses in B-ALL murine xenografts. Disclosures Ruella: Novartis: Patents & Royalties, Research Funding. Kenderian:Novartis: Patents & Royalties, Research Funding. Scholler:Novartis: Patents & Royalties. Lacey:Novartis: Patents & Royalties, Research Funding. Melenhorst:Novartis: Patents & Royalties, Research Funding. Hunter:Surface Oncology - SAB: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Porter:Novartis: Patents & Royalties, Research Funding. June:University of Pennsylvania: Patents & Royalties: financial interests due to intellectual property and patents in the field of cell and gene therapy. Conflicts of interest are managed in accordance with University of Pennsylvania policy and oversight; Novartis: Research Funding. Grupp:Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding. Gill:Novartis: Patents & Royalties, Research Funding.

Abstract Abstract 1923 Our understanding of the genetic abnormalities associated with the development of multiple myeloma has increased significantly in the last decade. However, very little is known about how, or if, myeloma tumor genomes change with time and if therapeutic interventions influence these events. To address these issues we studied a cohort of 29 patients for whom at least two serial samples (1-65 months, median 19 months) were available for analysis. Each serial pair was analyzed by both array-based comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) and microarray gene expression profiling (GEP) to identify DNA copy number abnormalities (CNA) at a 25kb resolution and gene expression differences present in the bulk of the tumor mass. Though this does not address the intra-clonal heterogeneity that may exist at a given time point, it does answer if the bulk of the tumor mass is changing with time. This study has unearthed several surprising and clinically relevant findings. First, myeloma tumor genomes are not as unstable as previous cytogenetic analyses suggest. In 40% of patients we observed no detectable CNA changes (1-37 months, median 12 months). In 24% of patients we observed the exclusive acquisition of new CNA (1-12, median 3.5) (3-22 months, median 18 months). In 36% of patients we observed both the loss (1-20, median 3) and gain (1-33, median 21) of CNA (5-43 months, median 20 months). Because time was not a significant influence on the detection of stable or unstable genomes we compared CNA changes with TC class and found patients with the high-risk 4p16 and maf IgH translocations were over-represented in the latter subset of patients. These observations raise the question of what happens between multiple rounds of therapy and if different regimens influence these phenotypes differently. For two patients with no CNA changes between the first two time points there was an additional sample that extended the follow-up by 52 and 12 months. Again no CNA changes were seen between diagnosis and these final samples taken 63 and 50 months later. For one patient with CNA changes (5 shared, 29 lost, and 32 gained) we have a detailed time course of 5 samples from diagnosis through to end-stage plasma cell leukemia. This patient received continuous lenalidomide-dexamethasone (Rd) for 20 months and progessed with a clone containing a BIRC2/3 deletion, which activates the NFKB pathway. The patient received single agent PR-171 and a bortezomib containing regimen and unexpectedly, the tumor genome observed in the third sample was almost identical (32 shared, 2 lost, and 4 gained CNA) to the first time point, including two copies of BIRC2/3. Subsequently, the patient received melphalan-prednisone-bortezomib (MPV) and the tumor genome observed in the fourth and fifth samples, which were identical, were similar to that seen in the second sample (24 shared, 13 lost, and 39 gained CNA). To understand these observations better we performed FISH to ascertain if the observed clones were detectable earlier, albeit at a low frequency. These experiments proved that the two dominant subclones observed at time points 1 and 3 versus 2, 4, 5 were mutually exclusive at the single cell level. Moreover, both of these clones were detectable at diagnosis with 12% of the tumor mass being the second subclone that eventually evolved into plasma cell leukemia. Interestingly, we assayed 5 of the 39 unique CNA observed in the final two samples and only one, the 17p13 deletion, was detectable earlier. This suggests the MPV regimen effectively eliminated a clone that was previously sensitive to Rd and selected for a dramatically evolved subclone that was previously sensitive to two different proteasome inhibitors. Although it is clear that the high-risk patients are enriched in the subset with the most changes, it is not clear if the specific drugs used (Melphalan vs IMID vs proteasome inhibitor) or intervention strategy (Cycled vs continuous/maintenance) and perhaps the response achieved (PR vs CR) influences these events. These observations do highlight two important clinical concepts that need to be considered in the future. First, the meaning of a partial response needs further investigation as this may reflect effective elimination of one subclone but not another. Second, because some patients are not changing or can revert back to a previous subclone we need to consider re-chanllenging patients with previously effective regimens when patients progress. Disclosures: Fonseca: Genzyme: Consultancy; Medtronic: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; AMGEN: Consultancy; Otsuka: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Intellikine: Consultancy; Cylene: Research Funding; Onyx: Research Funding; FISH probes prognostication in myeloma: Patents & Royalties. Stewart:Millennium: Consultancy; Celgene: Honoraria. Bergsagel:Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genentech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millennium: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Speakers Bureau.

Abstract In an attempt to identify novel genetic abnormalities in multiple myeloma (MM) we analyzed 68 MM patient samples and 42 human myeloma cell lines (HMCL) with high-resolution (60kb) array-based comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH). We concentrated on bi-allelic genomic deletions with the expectation that these regions might contain novel tumor suppressor genes and identified a common abnormality at 14q32. Fine mapping of the 14q32 microdeletion by PCR demonstrated a 45 kb minimal deletion encompassing two genes; TRAF3, a negative regulator of the non-canonical NF-kB pathway, and AMN. To determine the frequency of copy number abnormalities of this region a cohort of 161 patients were screened with a FISH probe mapping to the minimally deleted region. This identified 7 (4.4%) patients with bi-allelic deletion and 19 (11.8%) patients with a single copy of the target region. Sequencing of all TRAF3 coding exons in 62 patients and 42 HMCL identified inactivating mutations in 9 patient samples and 4 HMCL. Overall, the incidence of TRAF3 inactivation, bi-allelic deletion or mutation, is 7/42 (16.7%) in HMCL and 12/62 (19.4%) in patients, making it one of the most common genetic abnormalities identified in MM. Importantly, dysregulation of NF-kB pathways is a common event in MM, but the mechanism for this dysregulation is largely unknown. Although TRAF3 is a negative regulator of the non-canonical NF-kB pathway it has not previously been implicated in cancer. Therefore, we tested the tumor suppressor function of TRAF3 by reintroducing TRAF3 into HMCL harboring TRAF3 abnormalities using an adenovirus gene transfer system. Expression of TRAF3 in HMCL with TRAF3 abnormalities rapidly reversed cellular processing of NFKB2 from p100 (an inactive isoform) to p52 (active) and additionally led to a 60% reduction in cellular proliferation (range, 10–89%) associated with Go/G1 cell cycle arrest and induction of cell death by apoptosis. At 48 hrs post infection the proportion of cells entering S-phase or G2/M declined by 31% (range, 8.1–56.1) and the proportion undergoing apoptosis increased by 28% (range 11.7–47.4%). In contrast, over-expression of TRAF3 in control HMCL without TRAF3 abnormalities had no effect. Overall, TRAF3 is identified as a novel tumor suppressor that regulates the non-canonical NF-kB pathway and is inactivated in ~ 20% of MM patients. Given the involvement of the NF-kB pathway in multiple human malignancies and the near constitutive expression of TRAF3 we propose that inactivation of TRAF3, a novel tumor suppressor identified for the first time in this study, may occur in other cancers. In this regard, we have recently identified a Burkitt lymphoma cell line that does not express TRAF3 and thus has constitutive processing of p100 to p52. The clinical and therapeutic consequences of this finding and its frequency in other tumor types are currently the focus of further investigation. In conclusion, the abnormalities identified in this study represent the first mutations identified that cause constitutive NF-kB activation in MM.

Abstract Relapsing/refractory (r/r) B-cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL) is associated with a poor prognosis in both pediatric and adult patients. Novel therapies targeting CD19 on leukemic blasts, such as anti-CD19 Chimeric Antigen Receptor T cells (CART19, CTL019) or bi-specific anti-CD19/CD3 antibodies (blinatumomab) induce significant responses in this population. However, CD19-negative relapses have been reported in 5-10% of patients following CART19 or blinatumomab therapies. This is likely due to selective pressure on leukemia sub-clones by these potent anti-CD19 agents. Hence, novel effective immunotherapies are needed in order to treat these patients. In order to identify potential additional B-ALL antigens, samples from 20 r/r patients (including two that relapsed with CD19-negative disease after treatment with CART19 therapy) were screened using a custom Quantigene RNA panel (Affymetrix) and expression on cell surface was confirmed by multiparametric flow cytometry. The IL-3 receptor α (CD123) was one of the most highly and homogeneously expressed antigens in the blasts of 16/20 r/r ALL patients, and 2/2 CD19-negative relapses. Therefore, we sought to investigate the role of CART targeting CD123 (CART123) against r/r B-ALL, focusing on treating patients with CD19-negative relapses after prior anti-CD19 directed therapy. CART123 was shown to be effective in eradicating acute myeloid leukemia in xenograft mouse models but its role in ALL has not been investigated (Gill et al, Blood, 2014). We used a 2nd generation CAR123 construct that comprised a 4-1BB (CD137) co-stimulatory domain. T cells were lentivirally transduced and expanded using anti-CD3/CD28 beads. Head-to-head in vitro comparisons between CART123 and CART19 revealed similar rates of proliferation, CD107a degranulation, cytokine production and cytotoxicity when CART were co-cultured with the CD19+CD123+ B-ALL cell line NALM-6 and with primary B-ALL blasts. For in vivo evaluation, we utilized the primary ALL model that was developed by our group (Barrett et al, Blood, 2011). In this model, primary blasts obtained from ALL patients were passaged in NOD-SCID-γ chain KO (NSG) mice, and transduced with GFP/luciferase. We injected NSG mice with 2 million primary ALL blasts i.v. (CD19+, CD123+) and after engraftment, mice were treated with CART19, CART123 or control untransduced T cells (1 million i.v.). Mice treated with control T cells succumbed quickly to disease, while mice treated with either CART19 or CART123 showed tumor eradication and long term survival (Figure 1). We then evaluated the role of CART123 in the treatment of leukemia obtained from an ALL patient that relapsed with CD19-negative disease after CART19 treatment. Both CART123 and CART19 were incubated with CD19-negative ALL blasts; CART123, but not CART19 resulted in significant degranulation, robust cytokine production, and potent cytotoxicity. To confirm these results in vivo, we established a unique model of CD19-negative B-ALL xenograft. We used primary CD19-negative blasts obtained from a pediatric patient that relapsed after CART19 therapy; CD19-negative blasts were passaged in vivo in NSG mice and stably transduced with GFP/luciferase. Importantly, the blasts retained their CD19-negative phenotype. After engraftment, mice were treated with CART19, CART123 or control T cells. CART19 and control T cells had no anti-tumor activity, while CART123 resulted in a complete eradication of the disease and long term survival in these mice (Figure 2). In conclusion, CART123 represents an important additional approach to treating B-ALL, in particular due to its activity against CD19-negative relapses. Since we have previously shown that treatment with CART123 can lead to myelosuppression, CART123 should be employed to eradicate disease prior to allogeneic transplantation. Future direction may include combining CART123 with CART19 preemptively in order to avoid CD19 antigen escapes. Figure 1 Figure 1. Figure 2 Figure 2. Disclosures Ruella: Novartis: Research Funding. Kenderian:Novartis: Research Funding. Shestova:Novartis: Research Funding. Scholler:Novartis: Research Funding. Lacey:Novartis: Research Funding. Melenhorst:Novartis: Research Funding. Nazimuddin:Novartis: Research Funding. Kalos:Novartis: CTL019 Patents & Royalties, Research Funding. Porter:Novartis: Research Funding. June:Novartis: Patents & Royalties, Research Funding. Grupp:Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding. Gill:Novartis: Research Funding.

INTRODUCTION: Endoscopic surveillance guidelines in Barrett’s esophagus (BE) to detect progression to high grade dysplasia (HGD) or esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) are based solely on dysplasia grade. Given low rates of progression, identification of predictors (and scores) of progression may help to focus surveillance or intervention in those at higher risk. We aimed to assess predictors of progression and externally validate the Progression in Barrett’s (PIB) score in an independent multicenter prospective BE and EAC cohort. METHODS: The EA and Barrett’s esophagus (EABE) registry is a prospective cohort of patients recruited from three medical centers. Progressors were defined as those with the development of HGD or EAC more than 12 months after initial diagnosis. Demographic and clinical variables were abstracted. The annual incidence rate and predictors of progression were assessed using univariate and multivariable Cox proportional hazards analysis. The ability of the PIB score (incorporating weighted scores for male gender, smoking (ever versus never), BE length and confirmed LGD) to risk stratify the cohort into low (0-10 points), intermediate (11-20 points) and high risk (> 20 points) groups was assessed. RESULTS: 429 patients were included. 84% were men, with a mean (SD) age of 61.5 (9.9) years. 65% were ever smokers and most (76.7%), had NDBE at diagnosis. Mean (SD) maximal BE segment length was 5.9 (3.2) cm. Eighty-two patients (19.1%) progressed to HGD (n = 65) or EAC (n = 17) over a median (IQR) follow up of 7.5 (3.7, 12.5) years. Annual incidence rates of progression to EAC and EAC/HGD were 0.5% and 2.0% respectively. Univariate and multivariable predictors of progression are displayed in Table 1. The PIB score divided patients into three groups (Table 2) with progressively increasing rates of progression. The risk in the high risk group was three fold higher than the low risk group ( P = 0.024). The risk in the intermediate group was twofold higher but not statistically significantly higher ( P = 0.13). The PIB score had a c-statistic score of 0.76 in the original cohort. In this cohort the c-statistic value was lower at 0.64, suggesting moderate performance. CONCLUSION: Male sex and BE length predicted progression in this independent multicenter cohort. The PIB score was also able to risk-stratify patients in this validation cohort with the high risk cohort being 3x more likely to progress compared to the low risk cohort.

INTRODUCTION: The difference in long-term outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) and endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) for Barrett’s related superficial neoplasia remains unclear. We aimed to compare the rates of local and metachronous recurrence of ESD and EMR in patients with clinically staged BE-associated high-grade dysplasia (HGD) and T1a esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). METHODS: Multicenter study at six academic hospitals in the U.S. including patients who underwent ESD for BE-HGD or T1a EAC. Primary outcome was a composite of metastasis and local recurrence rate. A time-to-event analysis was performed to evaluate recurrence. A Kaplan-Meier plot was constructed, and a log-rank test was used to compare the groups. A Cox hazard ratio regression analysis was performed to identify predictors of recurrence. RESULTS: A total of 241 patients were included. 154 underwent EMR, while 84 underwent ESD (Table 1). ESD had higher en bloc (96% vs 33%, P < 0.0001), R0 (76% vs 54%, P = 0.0009) and curative resection rates (75% vs 32%, P < .0001) when compared to EMR. The 24-month local recurrence rate for EMR and ESD was 43% and 11%, respectively ( P = 0.0007) (Figure 1). Significantly more endoscopic resection procedures were required to treat recurrence after EMR compared to after ESD (Table 1). EMR, piecemeal resection, positive margins, and non-curative resection were identified as predictors of recurrence on univariate analysis. En bloc resection remained significant after multivariate analysis (Table 2). CONCLUSION: This multicenter study showed that ESD results in more definitive treatment of BE-associated early neoplasia than EMR, with significant lower recurrence rates and less need for repeat endoscopic therapeutic procedures than EMR.