Citations

Background: The patient/caregiver experience during CAR-T therapy is stressful, overwhelming, terrifying, and often a patient’s last treatment option. The Mayo Clinic Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery Innovation and Design team has worked with the CAR-T therapy clinical team to develop a patient experience that provides patients with a sense of caring, supportive environment, timely knowledge, and realistic expectations. Using a human-centered design approach, the Innovation and Design team worked with patients and caregivers to understand latent and unspoken needs in order to develop an ideal CAR-T therapy patient journey. Methods: With qualitative interviewing techniques, patient observation, and low fidelity experimentation, 21 patients/caregiver pairs were interviewed throughout their CAR-T therapy experience in 2018. Patients were interviewed at several touch points as well as encouraged to reach out to the Innovation and Design team at any point with reflections on their experiences. Patients were recruited as they began their evaluation phase for CAR-T therapy. The interviews were unscripted to allow for a breadth of discovery by not constraining the conversations to previously developed themes. As themes emerged from patient/caregiver interviews, artifacts and interventions were designed to alleviate pain points and improve the patient/caregiver experience. These artifacts and interventions were integrated into the clinical processes in real time and patient/caregivers were interviewed to understand the impact of these activities. Results: Several themes emerged from qualitative interviews with patients and caregivers. From the themes, interventions were developed. We were able to demonstrate a qualitative improvement in patient/caregiver experience through these interventions (Figure 1). Conclusions: Patients/caregivers undergoing CAR-T therapy have unique issues surrounding the logistics of care, emotional burden, and physical effects of treatment. We implemented processes to address these issues and observed a qualitative improvement via patient interviews/feedback. Ongoing work includes optimizing remote monitoring, digital platforms for patient education, and a quantitative study looking at patient reported outcomes (PROs) in such patients. To our knowledge, this is the first report for care delivery optimization in real-world practice for this new therapy.

7058 Background: The 2016 WHO classification includes myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasms, unclassifiable (MDS/MPN-U), as an MDS/MPN overlap syndrome not meeting criteria for well-defined entities such as CMML. No standard prognostication or treatment guidelines exist for such patients. Methods: We retrospectively identified MDS/MPN-U cases from 1990-2016 through our myeloid malignancies database. All bone marrow reports were reviewed to ensure compliance with 2016 WHO criteria. Clinical & cytogenetic parameters at diagnosis were assessed & compared with treatment outcomes. Results: Eighty nine patients met study criteria, with a median age of 69 years (range: 37-93); 58 (65%) males. Median follow-up was 22.2 months (range: 0-172), with 41 (46%) deaths & 13 (15%) leukemic transformations. Median OS was 24.8 months (range: 0-172). 43 (53%) patients had an abnormal karyotype, with common abnormalities being trisomy 8 (12%), complex karyotype (9%) & del (20q) (6%). Given the fewer types of abnormalities identified, the IPSS cytogenetic stratification was more effective than IPSS-R, with risk categorization including; 45 good (55%), 20 intermediate (25%) & 16 high risk (20%) respectively (8 unavailable). On univariate analysis, increased age (p = 0.05), decreased hemoglobin (p = 0.02), higher ANC (p = 0.03), circulating immature myeloid cells (p = 0.02), higher LDH (p = 0.009), absence of bone marrow ring sideroblasts (p = 0.001) & higher risk (intermediate & high) IPSS cytogenetic categories (p = 0.01) adversely impacted OS. In a multivariate model that included the aforementioned variables, higher risk IPSS cytogenetics retained a negative prognostic impact (p = 0.04). 28 patients received a median of 6 cycles (range: 1-21) of hypomethylating agent therapy (HMA), with an overall response rate of 18% (CR-3, PR-2). All responders had an abnormal karyotype (p = 0.01). However, HMA did not affect either OS or LFS. Conclusions: Intermediate & high risk IPSS cytogenetic categories independently & adversely impact survival in WHO defined MDS/MPN-U patients. HMA use did not impact OS; however, patients with abnormal karyotypes were more likely to respond.

e18091 Background: Allogeneic HCT is a potentially curative option for certain patients with AML. However, in-hospital outcomes and cost haven't been described. We use the NIS, a nationally weighted sample of hospital discharges in the US, to examine these outcomes. Methods: Years 2002-2013 of the NIS were queried for adults with a primary diagnosis of AML undergoing HCT. Mortality, length of stay, hospital charges, and complications were analyzed and predictors of increased charges and mortality were determined with multivariate regression analysis. Results: From 2002-2013 19,965 adults with AML were admitted for HCT. Donor sources included peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCTs) (79%); bone marrow (BMTs) (15%); umbilical cord blood (6%). In hospital mortality was 8%. Major complications included stomatitis (36%), total parenteral nutrition (TPN) (17%), neutropenic fever (14%), bacteremia (12%), mechanical ventilation (6%), and dialysis (3%). Median charges per hospitalization increased (p<0.01) from $161,894 (2002) to $324,765 (2013); median length of stay (27 days) remained stable over time. Multivariable regressions are depicted (Table). Umbilical cord blood transplants were associated with increased mortality (OR 2.25, p<0.01) and charges ($69,105, p<0.01) relative to PBSCTs. Conclusions: This study demonstrates increasing cost of BMT on a national level as well as increased cost and mortality with umbilical cord transplants. [Table: see text]