Citations

Clear

2966 citation(s) found for "Go, Ronald S".

IC‐02‐03: CSF biomarker and PIB‐PET–derived beta‐amyloid signature predicts metabolic, grey matter and cognitive changes in nondemented subjects
Ewers, Michael , Jagust, William J. , Shaw, Leslie M. , Trojanowski, John Q. , Aisen, Paul , Petersen, Ronald, Schuff, Norbert, Weiner, Michael P. , Insel, Philip S.

Mayo Clinic

Alzheimer's & Dementia | August 1, 2011 | Volume: 7 | Issue: 4S_Part_1 | Pages: No page available

10.1016/j.jalz.2011.05.010 Get It

IC‐P‐014: Seed‐based characterization of intrinsic connectivity networks for distinguishing dementia
Jones, David , Przybelski, Scott A. , Gunter, Jeffrey L. , Whitwell, Jennifer , Josephs, Keith A. , Petersen, Ronald C. , Vemuri, Prashanthi , Machulda, Mary M. , Knopman, David S. , Boeve, Bradley F. , Jack, Clifford R.

Mayo Clinic

Alzheimer's & Dementia | August 1, 2011 | Volume: 7 | Issue: 4S_Part_1 | Pages: No page available

10.1016/j.jalz.2011.05.031 Get It

IC‐P‐101: Effect of Amyloid‐Beta load on cognition is modified by the APOE status in a population‐based sample of cognitively normal older adults
Lowe, Val J. , Przybelski, Scott A. , Weigand, Stephen D. , Ivnik, Robert J., Preboske, Gregory M., Roberts, Rosebud O., Petersen, Ronald C. , Kantarci, Kejal , Senjem, Matthew L. , Geda, Yonas E. , Boeve, Bradley F. , Knopman, David S. , Jack, Clifford R.

Mayo Clinic

Alzheimer's & Dementia | August 1, 2011 | Volume: 7 | Issue: 4S_Part_2 | Pages: No page available

10.1016/j.jalz.2011.05.066 Get It

O1‐04‐05: CSF biomarker and PIB‐PET—derived beta‐amyloid signature predicts Brain metabolism, grey matter and cognitive changes in non‐demented subjects
Ewers, Michael , Aisen, Paul , Jagust, William J. , Schuff, Norbert, Weiner, Michael W. , Trojanowski, John Q. , Shaw, Leslie M. , Petersen, Ronald, Insel, Philip S.

Mayo Clinic

Alzheimer's & Dementia | August 1, 2011 | Volume: 7 | Issue: 4S_Part_3 | Pages: No page available

10.1016/j.jalz.2011.05.252 Get It

The Alzheimer's Association external quality control program for cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers
Mattsson, Niklas , Andréasson, Ulf , Batish, Sat Dev, Bernardini, Sergio , Bocchio‐Chiavetto, Luisella , Blankenstein, Marinus A. , Carrillo, María C. , Chalbot, Sonia, Coart, Els, Chiasserini, Davide , Cutler, Neal E., Dahlfors, Gunilla, Duller, Stefan, Fagan, Anne M. , Frisoni, Giovanni B. , Galimberti, Daniela , Hampel, Harald , Handberg, Aase , Heneka, Michael T. , Herskovits, A. Zara , Herukka, Sanna‐Kaisa , Humpel, Christian , Iqbal, Khalid , Kaeser, Stephan A. , Kaiser, Elmar, Kapaki, Elisabeth, Kidd, Daniel, Klivènyi, Péter , Knudsen, Cindy Soendersoe, Kummer, Markus P. , Lui, James, Lladó, Albert , Li, Qiao‐Xin , Martins, Ralph N. , Masters, Colin L. , McAuliffe, John C., Mercken, Marc, Moghekar, Abhay , Molinuevo, José Luís , Montine, Thomas J. , Nowatzke, William, O’Brien, Richard , Otto, Markus , Parnetti, Lucilla , Petersen, Ronald C. , Prvulovic, David, Reus, Herman P.M. de, Scarpini, Elio , Stefani, Alessandro , Schröder, Johannes , Shaw, Leslie M. , Skinningsrud, Anders, Skrogstad, Brith, Spreer, Annette, Trojanowski, John Q. , Tumani, Hayrettin , Umek, Robert M., Broeck, Bianca Van, Vanderstichele, Hugo, Vécsei, László , Blennow, Kaj , Frisoni, Giovanni B. , Persson, Staffan , Arai, Hiroyuki N. , Forlenza, Orestes Vicente , Galasko, Douglas , Holtzman, David M. , Hyman, Bradley T. , Jucker, Mathias , Lewczuk, Piotr , Paraskevas, George P. , Rissman, Robert A. , Soininen, Hilkka S. , Talib, Leda Leme , Teunissen, Charlotte E. , Verbeek, Marcel M. , Windisch, Manfred , Zhang, Jing , Zetterberg, Henrik , Parnetti, Lucilla , Molinuevo, José Luis , Masters, Colin L , Otto, Markus , Galimberti, Daniela

Mayo Clinic

Alzheimer's & Dementia | July 25, 2011 | Volume: 7 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 386

10.1016/j.jalz.2011.05.2243 | PMID 21784349 Get It

BackgroundThe cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers amyloid β (Aβ)‐42, total‐tau (T‐tau), and phosphorylated‐tau (P‐tau) demonstrate good diagnostic accuracy for Alzheimer's disease (AD). However, there are large variations in biomarker measurements between studies, and between and within laboratories. The Alzheimer's Association has initiated a global quality control program to estimate and monitor variability of measurements, quantify batch‐to‐batch assay variations, and identify sources of variability. In this article, we present the results from the first two rounds of the program.MethodsThe program is open for laboratories using commercially available kits for Aβ, T‐tau, or P‐tau. CSF samples (aliquots of pooled CSF) are sent for analysis several times a year from the Clinical Neurochemistry Laboratory at the Mölndal campus of the University of Gothenburg, Sweden. Each round consists of three quality control samples.ResultsForty laboratories participated. Twenty‐six used INNOTEST enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay kits, 14 used Luminex xMAP with the INNO‐BIA AlzBio3 kit (both measure Aβ‐(1‐42), P‐tau(181P), and T‐tau), and 5 used Meso Scale Discovery with the Aβ triplex (AβN‐42, AβN‐40, and AβN‐38) or T‐tau kits. The total coefficients of variation between the laboratories were 13% to 36%. Five laboratories analyzed the samples six times on different occasions. Within‐laboratory precisions differed considerably between biomarkers within individual laboratories.ConclusionsMeasurements of CSF AD biomarkers show large between‐laboratory variability, likely caused by factors related to analytical procedures and the analytical kits. Standardization of laboratory procedures and efforts by kit vendors to increase kit performance might lower variability, and will likely increase the usefulness of CSF AD biomarkers.
Assessment of cognition in early dementia
Silverberg, Nina, Ryan, Laurie, Petersen, Ronald C. , Posner, Holly, Hilsabeck, Robin C. , Rizzo, Albert, Ott, Brian R. , Albert, Marilyn S. , Wagster, Molly V., Schinka, John A., Cullum, C. Munro , Farias, Sarah Tomaszewski , Balota, David A., Budson, Andrew E. , Strutt, Adriana M. , Gollan, Tamar H. , Babcock, Debra, Kramer, Joel H. , Carrillo, María C. , Sperling, Reisa Anne , Snyder, Peter J. , Gallagher, Michela , Raber, Jacob , Possin, Katherine L. , King, Jonathan W. , Kaye, Jeffrey , Rao, Stephen M. , Loewenstein, David , Brandt, Jason , Manly, Jennifer J. , Barnes, Lisa L. , Ganguli, Mary , Litvan, Irene , Ferman, Tanis J.

Mayo Clinic

Alzheimer's & Dementia | July 25, 2011 | Volume: 7 | Issue: 3 | Pages: No page available

10.1016/j.jalz.2011.05.001 | PMID 23559893 Get It

Better tools for assessing cognitive impairment in the early stages of Alzheimer's disease (AD) are required to enable diagnosis of the disease before substantial neurodegeneration has taken place and to allow for detection of subtle changes in the early stages of progression of the disease. The National Institute on Aging and the Alzheimer's Association convened a meeting to discuss state‐of‐the art methods for cognitive assessment, including computerized batteries, as well as new approaches in the pipeline. Speakers described research using novel tests of object recognition, spatial navigation, attentional control, semantic memory, semantic interference, prospective memory, false memory, and executive function as among the tools that could provide earlier identification of individuals with AD. In addition to early detection, there is a need for assessments that reflect real‐world situations so as to better assess functional disability. It is especially important to develop assessment tools that are useful in ethnically, culturally, and linguistically diverse populations as well as in individuals with neurodegenerative disease other than AD.
Trajectories of brain and hippocampal atrophy in FTD with mutations in MAPT or GRN
Whitwell, Jennifer L. , Weigand, Stephen D. , Gunter, Jeffrey L. , Rademakers, Rosa , Baker, Matt , Petersen, Ronald C. , Jack, Clifford R. , Josephs, Keith A. , Boeve, Bradley F. , Knopman, David S. , Wszołek, Zbigniew K. , Jack, Clifford R

Mayo Clinic

Neurology | July 14, 2011 | Volume: 77 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 393-398

10.1212/wnl.0b013e318227047f | PMID 21753165 Get It

Low Testosterone Associated With Obesity and the Metabolic Syndrome Contributes to Sexual Dysfunction and Cardiovascular Disease Risk in Men With Type 2 Diabetes
Jackson, Graham, Jones, T. Hugh , Matsumoto, Alvin M. , Nehra, Ajay, Perelman, Michael A. , Traish, A., Zitzmann, Michael , Cunningham, Glenn R. , Wang, Christina , Swerdloff, Ronald S.

Mayo Clinic

Diabetes Care | June 28, 2011 | Volume: 34 | Issue: 7 | Pages: 1669-1675

10.2337/dc10-2339 | PMID 21709300 Get It

Restenosis after balloon angioplasty. A practical proliferative model in porcine coronary arteries.
Schwartz, Robert S., Murphy, Joseph G. , Edwards, William D. , Camrud, Allan R., Vliestra, Ronald E., Holmes, David R.

Mayo Clinic

Circulation | June 17, 2011 | Volume: 82 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 2190-2200

10.1161/01.cir.82.6.2190 | PMID 2146991 Get It

A model of proliferative human restenosis was developed in domestic pigs by using deep injury to the coronary arterial media. Metal wire coils were delivered percutaneously to the coronary arteries of 11 pigs with an oversized, high-pressure (14 atm) balloon and were left in place for times ranging from 28 to 70 days. During placement, the balloon expanded the coils and delivered them securely within the arterial lumen. Light microscopic examination of the vessels confirmed fracture of the internal elastic lamina by the coil. An extensive proliferative response occurred in 10 of the 11 pigs and was associated with a luminal area narrowing of at least 50% in all but one pig. The histopathologic features of the proliferative response were identical to those observed in human cases of restenosis after angioplasty. Immunohistochemical studies confirmed the prominence of smooth muscle cells in the proliferative tissue. A similar response was obtained in two of five porcine coronary arteries in which balloon inflation only was performed, without coil implant. This model is practical and inexpensive and closely mimics the proliferative portion of human restenosis both grossly and microscopically. Thus, it may be useful for understanding human restenosis and for testing therapies aimed at preventing restenosis after balloon angioplasty or other coronary interventional procedures.
Myocardial Infarction After Carotid Stenting and Endarterectomy
Blackshear, Joseph L., Cutlip, Donald E. , Roubin, Gary S., Hill, Michael D. , Leimgruber, Pierre P., Begg, Richard J., Eidt, John F. , Narins, Craig R. , Prineas, Ronald J. , Glasser, Stephen P. , Voeks, Jenifer H. , Brott, Thomas G. , Investigators, for the CREST, Cohen, David Jonathan , Investigators, for the CREST, Hill, Michael D

Mayo Clinic

Circulation | May 24, 2011 | Volume: 123 | Issue: 22 | Pages: 2571-2578

10.1161/circulationaha.110.008250 | PMID 21606394 Get It

Background— The Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy Versus Stenting Trial (CREST) found a higher risk of stroke after carotid artery stenting and a higher risk of myocardial infarction (MI) after carotid endarterectomy. Methods and Results— Cardiac biomarkers and ECGs were performed before and 6 to 8 hours after either procedure and if there was clinical evidence of ischemia. In CREST, MI was defined as biomarker elevation plus either chest pain or ECG evidence of ischemia. An additional category of biomarker elevation with neither chest pain nor ECG abnormality was prespecified (biomarker+ only). Crude mortality and risk-adjusted mortality for MI and biomarker+ only were assessed during follow-up. Among 2502 patients, 14 MIs occurred in carotid artery stenting and 28 MIs in carotid endarterectomy (hazard ratio, 0.50; 95% confidence interval, 0.26 to 0.94; P =0.032) with a median biomarker ratio of 40 times the upper limit of normal. An additional 8 carotid artery stenting and 12 carotid endarterectomy patients had biomarker+ only (hazard ratio, 0.66; 95% confidence interval, 0.27 to 1.61; P =0.36), and their median biomarker ratio was 14 times the upper limit of normal. Compared with patients without biomarker elevation, mortality was higher over 4 years for those with MI (hazard ratio, 3.40; 95% confidence interval, 1.67 to 6.92) or biomarker+ only (hazard ratio, 3.57; 95% confidence interval, 1.46 to 8.68). After adjustment for baseline risk factors, both MI and biomarker+ only remained independently associated with increased mortality. Conclusions— In patients randomized to carotid endarterectomy versus carotid artery stenting, both MI and biomarker+ only were more common with carotid endarterectomy. Although the levels of biomarker elevation were modest, both events were independently associated with increased future mortality and remain an important consideration in choosing the mode of carotid revascularization or medical therapy. Clinical Trial Registration— URL: http://www.ClinicalTrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT00004732.