Citations

Clear

479 citation(s) found for "Barnes, J N".

Molecular and Pathology Features of Colorectal Tumors and Patient Outcomes Are Associated with Fusobacterium nucleatum and Its Subspecies animalis
Borozan, Ivan , Zaidi, Syed Hassan Ejaz , Harrison, Tabitha A. , Phipps, Amanda I. , Zheng, Jiayin , Lee, Stephen Dongsoo , Trinh, Quang M. , Steinfelder, Robert S. , Adams, Jeremy , Banbury, Barbara L. , Berndt, Sonja I. , Bullman, Susan , Cao, Yin , Figueiredo, Jane C. , Giannakis, Marios , Luo, Xuemei , Nishihara, Reiko , Papadopoulos, Nickolas , Reid, Emma , Thibodeau, Stephen N. , Harlid, Sophia , Gsur, Andrea , Gallinger, Steven, Ferretti, Vincent , Peters, Ulrike , Lee, Stephen , Brezina, Stefanie , Buchanan, Daniel D , Farris, Alton B , Figueiredo, Jane C , Mardis, Elaine R. , Harlid, Sophia , Um, Caroline Y , Hsu, Li , Gsur, Andrea , Campbell, Peter T , Ogino, Shuji , Sun, Wei , Hudson, Thomas J , Peters, Ulrike , Zheng, Yingye , Cao, Yin , Harrison, Tabitha A , Trinh, Quang M , Brezina, Stefanie , Buchanan, Daniel D. , Farris, Alton B. , Heisler, Lawrence E. , Hopper, John L. , Lin, Yi , Qu, Conghui , Reid, Emma E.G., Um, Caroline Y. , Campbell, Peter T. , Newcomb, Polly A. , Sun, Wei

Mayo Clinic

Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention | November 4, 2021 | Volume: 31 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 210-220

10.1158/1055-9965.epi-21-0463 | PMID 34737207 Get It

Abstract Background: Fusobacterium nucleatum (F. nucleatum) activates oncogenic signaling pathways and induces inflammation to promote colorectal carcinogenesis. Methods: We characterized F. nucleatum and its subspecies in colorectal tumors and examined associations with tumor characteristics and colorectal cancer–specific survival. We conducted deep sequencing of nusA, nusG, and bacterial 16s rRNA genes in tumors from 1,994 patients with colorectal cancer and assessed associations between F. nucleatum presence and clinical characteristics, colorectal cancer–specific mortality, and somatic mutations. Results: F. nucleatum, which was present in 10.3% of tumors, was detected in a higher proportion of right-sided and advanced-stage tumors, particularly subspecies animalis. Presence of F. nucleatum was associated with higher colorectal cancer–specific mortality (HR, 1.97; P = 0.0004). This association was restricted to nonhypermutated, microsatellite-stable tumors (HR, 2.13; P = 0.0002) and those who received chemotherapy [HR, 1.92; confidence interval (CI), 1.07–3.45; P = 0.029). Only F. nucleatum subspecies animalis, the main subspecies detected (65.8%), was associated with colorectal cancer–specific mortality (HR, 2.16; P = 0.0016), subspecies vincentii and nucleatum were not (HR, 1.07; P = 0.86). Additional adjustment for tumor stage suggests that the effect of F. nucleatum on mortality is partly driven by a stage shift. Presence of F. nucleatum was associated with microsatellite instable tumors, tumors with POLE exonuclease domain mutations, and ERBB3 mutations, and suggestively associated with TP53 mutations. Conclusions: F. nucleatum, and particularly subspecies animalis, was associated with a higher colorectal cancer–specific mortality and specific somatic mutated genes. Impact: Our findings identify the F. nucleatum subspecies animalis as negatively impacting colorectal cancer mortality, which may occur through a stage shift and its effect on chemoresistance.
Question Prompt List as a Communication Tool for Adults With Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease
Kamal, A. N. , Achkar, Edgar, Carlson, Dustin A. , Clarke, John O. , Gyawali, C. Prakash , Katzka, David A. , Patel, Dhyanesh A. , Rezaie, Ali , Savarino, Edoardo , Shaheen, Nicholas J. , Clarke, J , Gyawali, C P , Savarino, Edoardo , Kamal, Afrin, Fass, Ronnie , Penagini, Roberto , Roman, Sabine , Triadafilopoulos, George

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology | October 18, 2021 | Volume: 56 | Issue: 7 | Pages: 565-570

10.1097/mcg.0000000000001613 | PMID 34653066 Get It

Background: Question prompt lists (QPLs) are structured sets of disease-specific questions intended for patient use, enhancing the patient-physician communication by encouraging patients to ask relevant questions during a consultation. Recently, a preliminary 78 question gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) specific QPL was created by 12 esophageal experts through a modified Delphi (RAND/University of California, Los Angeles) technique. Patients’ perspectives and opinions on each question, however, had not been accounted for in the preliminary expert’ version. Aim: The aim was to modify a preliminary experts’ QPL, specific to adults with GERD, following patient perspectives and opinions. Methods: A preliminary GERD QPL was modified through patient input and opinions. Thirty-eight patients with a clinical diagnosis of GERD followed at Stanford University Esophageal Clinic between January and November 2019 were consented to modify the preliminary 78 question expert QPL version. After receiving the QPL in Qualtrics (Provo, UT) by a direct e-mail invitation, patients independently rated questions on a 5-point Likert scale, where 1=“should not be included,” 2=“unimportant,” 3=“don’t know/depends,” 4=“important,” and 5=“essential.” Questions were accepted for inclusion in the QPL with an a priori interagreement of 80% ranking in the range of 4 to 5. At the end, patients were encouraged to propose additional questions to incorporate into the QPL by open-endedly asking “Are there questions we didn’t ask, that you think we should?” Results: Twenty-three patients with GERD (19 female, median age 64) fully participated and modified the existing QPL (60.5%). Of the 78 questions from the preliminary GERD QPL, 66 questions (84.6%) were accepted for inclusion. The question with the highest agreement among patients rating a question as essential consisted of “what habits, food, and drinks do I have to avoid?” (82.6%). Questions eliminated because of disagreement included “What is the natural history of GERD,” “Do I have a high chance to die from my Barrett’s?,” and “Why are you prescribing an antidepressant to treat my GERD?” Nine patients suggested additional questions totaling to 16 separate questions, including “What type of surgeries are there to help GERD?,” “What stage is my GERD?,” “What are the odds/percentage of getting cancer from GERD?” Incorporating the suggested questions, the final GERD QPL—created by esophageal experts and modified by patients—consisted of 82 questions. Conclusion: Esophageal experts and GERD patients have a high level of agreement on important questions, though there is some variation in perspective. Future studies can simplify this list and measure the impact of a shared GERD QPL on patients’ decisional conflict and perceived involvement in care.
The Role of Specialty Palliative Care for Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
Sethi, Anish , Everett, Elyse A. , Mehta, Ambereen K. , Besbris, Jessica, Burke, Christa, Pedowitz, Elizabeth , Kilpatrick, Molly, Foster, Laura A. , Maiser, Sam

Mayo Clinic

American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine® | September 28, 2021 | Volume: 39 | Issue: 7 | Pages: 865-873

10.1177/10499091211049386 | PMID 34583569 Get It

Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) is a progressive and incurable neurodegenerative disease resulting in the loss of motor neurons, eventually leading to death. ALS results in complex physical, emotional, and spiritual care needs. Specialty Palliative Care (SPC) is a medical specialty for patients with serious illness that provides an extra layer of support through complicated symptom management, goals of care conversations, and support to patients and families during hard times. Using MEDLINE, APA Psychinfo, and Dynamed databases, we reviewed the literature of SPC in ALS to inform and support an expert opinion perspective on this topic. This manuscript focuses on several key areas of SPC for ALS including insurance and care models, advance care planning, symptom management, quality of life, caregiver support, and end-of-life care. Recommendations to improve specialty palliative care for patients with ALS are reviewed in the discussion section.
Radiomics Derived Brain Age Predicts Functional Outcome After Acute Ischemic Stroke
Bretzner, Martin , Bonkhoff, Anna K. , Schirmer, Markus D. , Hong, Sung‐Min , Donahue, Kathleen, Etherton, Mark R. , Rist, Pamela M. , Nardin, Marco, Regenhardt, Robert W. , Leclerc, X. , Gautherot, Morgan , Wang, Clinton, Benavente, Oscar, Donatti, Amanda , Heitsch, Laura , Jiménez-Conde, Jordi , Kittner, Steven J. , McArdle, Patrick, Rolfs, Arndt , Schmidt, Reinhold, Sharma, Pankaj , Słowik, Agnieszka , Sousa, Alessandro Viana Oliveira e, Strbian, Daniel , Wassélius, Johan , Woo, Daniel , Worrall, Bradford B. , Maguire, Jane , Golland, Polina , Kuchcinski, Grégory , Rost, Natalia S. , Bretzner, Martin , Strbian, Daniel , Regenhardt, Robert W , Dalca, Adrian Vasile , Giese, Anne‐Katrin , Lopes, Renaud , Cole, John W. , Griessenauer, Christoph J. , Holmegaard, Lukas , Jood, Katarina , Lemmens, Robin , Levi, Christopher , McDonough, Caitrin W. , Meschia, James F. , Phuah, Chia‐Ling , Ropele, Stefan , Rosand, Jonathan M. , Roquer, Jaume , Rundek, Tatjana , Sacco, Ralph L. , Sousa, Alessandro Augusto Viana Oliveira e, Stanne, Tara M. , Tatlisumak, Turgut , Thijs, Vincent , Vagal, Achala , Wu, Ona , Zand, Ramin , Lindgren, Arne G. , Jern, Christina

Mayo Clinic

No container title available | September 24, 2021 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.21203/rs.3.rs-923769/v1 Get It

Abstract While chronological age is one of the most influential determinants of post-stroke outcomes, little is known of the impact of neuroimaging-derived biological brain age. We here first examine whether radiomics analysis of the texture of brain T2-FLAIR MRI images can be used to predict brain age in stroke patients. We then assess the clinical determinants of accelerated brain aging and, finally, its impact on post-stroke functional outcomes. Leveraging a multisite cohort of 4,163 ischemic stroke patients, we show that older-appearing patients have more hypertension, diabetes mellitus, prior strokes, and smoking history and are more likely to develop worse post-stroke outcomes than their younger-appearing counterparts. Our results strengthen the importance of preventive medicine for maintaining brain health in stroke patients as they age and suggest a novel methodology to capture previously undescribed prognostic information available on commonly acquired MRI sequences during routine stroke care.
NCCN Guidelines® Insights: Uterine Neoplasms, Version 3.2021
Abu‐Rustum, Nadeem R. , Yashar, Catheryn M. , Bradley, Kristin , Campos, Susana M. , Chino, Junzo , Chon, Hye Sook, Damast, Shari , Diver, Elisabeth , Fisher, Christine M. , Frederick, Peter J., Gaffney, David K. , Giuntoli, Robert , Han, Ernest , Howitt, Brooke E. , Huh, Warner K. , Mariani, Andrea , Nekhlyudov, Larissa , Podoll, Mirna, Remmenga, Steven W., Reynolds, R. Kevin, Salani, Ritu , Sisodia, Rachel , Soliman, Pamela T. , Ueda, Stefanie , Urban, Renata R. , Wyse, Emily , Zanotti, Kristine , McMillian, Nicole R., Motter, Angela D., Chu, Christina , Cohn, David E. , Crispens, Marta Ann , George, Suzanne , Lea, Jayanthi Sivasothy , Mutch, David G. , Tanner, Edward J. , Wethington, Stephanie L.

Mayo Clinic

Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network | August 20, 2021 | Volume: 19 | Issue: 8 | Pages: 888-895

10.6004/jnccn.2021.0038 | PMID 34416706 Get It

The NCCN Guidelines for Uterine Neoplasms provide recommendations for diagnostic workup, clinical staging, and treatment options for patients with endometrial cancer or uterine sarcoma. These NCCN Guidelines Insights focus on the recent addition of molecular profiling information to aid in accurate diagnosis, classification, and treatment of uterine sarcomas.
NCCN Guidelines® Insights: Palliative Care, Version 2.2021
Dans, Maria, Kutner, Jean S. , Agarwal, Rajiv , Baker, Justin N. , Bauman, Jessica R. , Carey, Elise C. , Dalal, Shalini , Doberman, Danielle J. , Fecher, Leslie A. , Kapo, Jennifer, Lee, Richard T. , McCammon, Susan , Mitchell, William M. , Ogunseitan, Adeboye, Portman, Diane , Ramchandran, Kavitha , Sutton, Linda , Teply, Melissa , Terauchi, Stephanie , Walling, Anne M. , Zachariah, Finly , Bergman, Mary Anne, Ogba, Ndiya , Campbell, Mallory, Agarwal, Rajiv , Ramchandran, Kavitha J , Beck, Anna Catherine , Campbell, Toby C. , Case, Amy Allen , Epstein, Andrew S , Jones, Joshua , Loggers, Elizabeth T , Mitchell, William, Temel, Jennifer S. , Thomas, Jane deLima

Mayo Clinic

Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network | August 2, 2021 | Volume: 19 | Issue: 7 | Pages: 780-788

10.6004/jnccn.2021.0033 | PMID 34340208 Get It

Palliative care has evolved to be an integral part of comprehensive cancer care with the goal of early intervention to improve quality of life and patient outcomes. The NCCN Guidelines for Palliative Care provide recommendations to help the primary oncology team promote the best quality of life possible throughout the illness trajectory for each patient with cancer. The NCCN Palliative Care Panel meets annually to evaluate and update recommendations based on panel members’ clinical expertise and emerging scientific data. These NCCN Guidelines Insights summarize the panel’s recent discussions and highlights updates on the importance of fostering adaptive coping strategies for patients and families, and on the role of pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic interventions to optimize symptom management.
Breast and Prostate Cancer Risks for MaleBRCA1andBRCA2Pathogenic Variant Carriers Using Polygenic Risk Scores
Barnes, Daniel R. , Silvestri, Valentina , Leslie, Goska , McGuffog, Lesley, Yang, Xin , Adlard, Julian , Agnarsson, Bjarni A. , Ahmed, Munaza, Aittomäki, Kristiina, Andrulis, Irene L. , Arason, Aðalgeir , Azzollini, Jacopo , Barkardóttir, Rósa B. , Barrowdale, Daniel , Belotti, Muriel, Berthet, Pascaline, Boonen, Susanne E. , Borg, Åke , Brady, Angela F., Brewer, Carole, Brunet, Joan , Bucalo, Agostino, Caldés, Trinidad , Cassingham, Hayley , Christensen, Lise Lotte , Cini, Giulia , Claes, Kathleen , Collaborators, GEMO Study, Collaborators, EMBRACE, Cortesi, Laura , Damante, Giuseppe , Darder, Esther , Davidson, Rosemarie, Leeneer, Kim De , Putter, Robin De , Valle, Jesús Del , Ding, Yuan Chun , Donaldson, Alan , Eason, Jacqueline , Eeles, Rosalind A. , Engel, Christoph , Evans, D. Gareth , Feliubadaló, Lídia , Frone, Megan N. , Frost, Debra, Gehrig, Andrea, Giraud, Sophie , Glendon, Gord , Goldgar, David E. , Greene, Mark H. , Gregory, Helen , Groß, Eva, Hahnen, Eric, Hamann, Ute, Hansen, Thomas van Overeem , Hanson, Helen , Horváth, Judit , Investigators, KConFab, Investigators, HEBON, Izatt, Louise , James, Paul A. , Janavičius, Ramūnas , Jensen, Uffe Birk , Johannsson, Oskar T., John, Esther M. , Kramer, Gero , Kroeldrup, Lone , Kruse, Torben A. , Lautrup, Charlotte Kvist , López‐Fernández, Adrià , Mai, Phuong L, Manoukian, Siranoush , Mátrai, Zoltán , Matricardi, Laura , Mebirouk, Noura, Meindl, Alfons , Montagna, Marco , Monteiro, Álvaro N.A. , Morrison, Patrick J. , Muranen, Taru , Nathanson, Katherine L. , Niederacher, Dieter , Oláh, Edith , Olopade, Olufunmilayo I. , Pedersen, Inge Søkilde , Peissel, Bernard , Peterlongo, Paolo , Petersen, Annabeth Høgh , Pinto, Pedro, Porteous, Mary, Pottinger, Caroline , Pujana, Miquel Angel, Ramser, Juliane, Rantala, Johanna, Rogers, Mark T., Rønlund, Karina, Abajo, A.M. SÁnchez De, Shah, Payal D. , Sharif, Saba , Side, Lucy, Stadler, Zsofia, Steele, Linda , Sutter, Christian , Tan, Yen Y. , Teixeira, Manuel R. , Teulé, Àlex , Thull, Darcy L. , Trainer, Alison H., Tripathi, Vishakha , Valentini, Virginia , Viel, Alessandra , Walker, Lisa, Wang‐Gohrke, Shan , Wappenschmidt, Barbara , Whaite, Anna , Offit, Kenneth, Thomassen, Mads , Schmutzler, Rita K., Simard, Jacques , Easton, Douglas F. , Chenevix‐Trench, Georgia , Antoniou, Antonis C. , Pujana, Miguel Ángel , Dennis, Joe , Yang, Xin , Adlard, Julian , Agnarsson, Bjarni A , Andrulis, Irene L , Arason, Adalgeir , Arnold, Norbert , Auber, Bernd , Azzollini, Jacopo , Barkardottir, Rosa B , Barrowdale, Daniel , Benitez, Javier , Boonen, Susanne E , Bozsik, Aniko , Brennan, Paul , Brunet, Joan , Bucalo, Agostino , Caligo, Maria A , Campbell, Ian G , Cassingham, Hayley , Cini, Giulia , Claes, Kathleen B M , Coppa, Anna , Cortesi, Laura , Darder, Esther , de la Hoya, Miguel , de Putter, Robin , Del Valle, Jesús , Domchek, Susan M , Donaldson, Alan , Eason, Jacqueline , Engel, Christoph , Fostira, Florentia , Frone, Megan , Glendon, Gord , Godwin, Andrew K. , Greene, Mark H , Hahnen, Eric , Hanson, Helen , Izatt, Louise , Izquierdo, Angel , James, Paul , John, Esther M , Kroeldrup, Lone , Kruse, Torben A , Lazaro, Conxi , Lesueur, Fabienne , Matrai, Zoltan , Montagna, Marco , Monteiro, Alvaro N , Morrison, Patrick J , Muranen, Taru A , Nathanson, Katherine L , Neuhausen, Susan L. , Nevanlinna, H , Nguyen-Dumont, Tu , Niederacher, Dieter , Palli, Domenico , Parsons, Michael T , Perez-Segura, Pedro , Peterlongo, Paolo , Pinto, Pedro , Pottinger, Caroline , Radice, Paolo , Robson, Mark , Rump, Andreas , Sharif, Saba , Steele, Linda , Stoppa-Lyonnet, Dominique , Teixeira, Manuel R , Thull, Darcy L , Tischkowitz, Marc D. , Toland, Amanda Ewart , Tommasi, Stefania , Toss, Angela , Tripathi, Vishakha , Valentini, Virginia , van Asperen, Christi J , Venturelli, Marta , Viel, Alessandra , Joseph, Vijai , Whaite, Anna , Simard, Jacques , Easton, Doug , Chenevix-Trench, Georgia , Ottini, Laura , Barnes, Daniel R , Leslie, Goska , Pujana, Miquel Angel , Eeles, Rosalind A , Evans, D Gareth , Matricardi, Laura , Olopade, Olufunmilayo I , Silvestri, Valentina , De Leeneer, Kim , Feliubadaló, Lidia , Hansen, Thomas van Overeem , Manoukian, Siranoush , Arnold, Norbert , Auber, Bernd , Balmañà, Judith , Barwell, Julian , Benı́tez, Javier , Bozsik, Anikó , Brady, Angela F., Buys, Saundra S. , Caligo, Maria A. , Campbell, Ian , Collaborators, GEMO Study, Collaborators, EMBRACE, Cook, Jackie A , Hoya, Miguel de la , Dı́ez, Orland , Domchek, Susan M. , Gallagher, David James , Hentschel, Julia , Investigators, KConFab, Investigators, HEBON, Izquierdo, Á. , Lázaro, Conxi , Lesueur, Fabienne , Mai, Phuong L, Maxwell, Kara N. , Meindl, Alfons , Nevanlinna, Heli , Nguyen‐Dumont, Tú , Palli, Domenico , Parsons, Michael T. , Radice, Paolo , Robson, Mark E. , Rump, Andreas , Singer, Christian F. , Stoppa‐Lyonnet, Dominique , Asperen, Christi J. van , Vijai, Joseph , Zanna, Ines , Couch, Fergus J. , Ottini, Laura

Mayo Clinic

JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute | July 26, 2021 | Volume: 114 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 109-122

10.1093/jnci/djab147 | PMID 34320204 Get It

AbstractBackgroundRecent population-based female breast cancer and prostate cancer polygenic risk scores (PRS) have been developed. We assessed the associations of these PRS with breast and prostate cancer risks for male BRCA1 and BRCA2 pathogenic variant carriers.Methods483 BRCA1 and 1318 BRCA2 European ancestry male carriers were available from the Consortium of Investigators of Modifiers of BRCA1/2 (CIMBA). A 147-single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) prostate cancer PRS (PRSPC) and a 313-SNP breast cancer PRS were evaluated. There were 3 versions of the breast cancer PRS, optimized to predict overall (PRSBC), estrogen receptor (ER)–negative (PRSER-), or ER-positive (PRSER+) breast cancer risk.ResultsPRSER+ yielded the strongest association with breast cancer risk. The odds ratios (ORs) per PRSER+ standard deviation estimates were 1.40 (95% confidence interval [CI] =1.07 to 1.83) for BRCA1 and 1.33 (95% CI = 1.16 to 1.52) for BRCA2 carriers. PRSPC was associated with prostate cancer risk for BRCA1 (OR = 1.73, 95% CI = 1.28 to 2.33) and BRCA2 (OR = 1.60, 95% CI = 1.34 to 1.91) carriers. The estimated breast cancer odds ratios were larger after adjusting for female relative breast cancer family history. By age 85 years, for BRCA2 carriers, the breast cancer risk varied from 7.7% to 18.4% and prostate cancer risk from 34.1% to 87.6% between the 5th and 95th percentiles of the PRS distributions.ConclusionsPopulation-based prostate and female breast cancer PRS are associated with a wide range of absolute breast and prostate cancer risks for male BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers. These findings warrant further investigation aimed at providing personalized cancer risks for male carriers and informing clinical management.
TNFRSF13B genotypes control immune-mediated pathology by regulating the functions of innate B cells
Barbosa, Mayara Garcia de Mattos , Lefferts, Adam R. , Huynh, Daniel , Liu, Hui , Zhang, Yu , Barnes, Jenna , Samaniego, Milagros , Bram, Richard J. , Geha, Raif , Shikanov, Ariella , Farkash, Evan A. , Platt, Jeffrey L. , Samaniego-Picota, Milagros , Fu, Beverly, Geha, Raif , Prak, Eline T. Luning , Cascalho, Marília

Mayo Clinic

JCI Insight | July 20, 2021 | Volume: 6 | Issue: 17 | Pages: No page available

10.1172/jci.insight.150483 | PMID 34283811 Get It

Host genes define the severity of inflammation and immunity but specific loci doing so are unknown. Here we show that TNF receptor superfamily member 13B ( TNFRSF13B ) variants, which enhance defense against certain pathogens, also control immune-mediated injury of transplants, by regulating innate B cells’ functions. Analysis of TNFRSF13B in human kidney transplant recipients revealed that 33% of those with antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) but fewer than 6% of those with stable graft function had TNFRSF13B missense mutations. To explore mechanisms underlying aggressive immune responses, we investigated alloimmunity and rejection in mice. Cardiac allografts in Tnfrsf13b- mutant mice underwent early and severe AMR. The dominance and precocity of AMR in Tnfrsf13b -deficient mice were not caused by increased alloantibodies. Rather, Tnfrsf13b mutations decreased “natural” IgM and compromised complement regulation, leading to complement deposition in allografted hearts and autogenous kidneys. Thus, WT TNFRSF13B and Tnfrsf13b support innate B cell functions that limit complement-associated inflammation; in contrast, common variants of these genes intensify inflammatory responses that help clear microbial infections but allow inadvertent tissue injury to ensue. The wide variation in inflammatory reactions associated with TNFRSF13B diversity suggests polymorphisms could underlie variation in host defense and explosive inflammatory responses that sometimes enhance morbidity associated with immune responses.
Abstract 219: Health Literacy and Numeracy in Patients Considering a Left Ventricular Assist Device: Findings From the DECIDE-LVAD Trial
Raymer, David S., Thompson, Jocelyn S. , Leister, Erin, Fairclough, Diane L., LaRue, Shane , Allen, Larry A. , Matlock, Daniel D. , McIlvennan, Colleen Kelley , Dunlay, Shannon M.

Mayo Clinic

Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes | July 3, 2021 | Volume: 11 | Issue: suppl_1 | Pages: No page available

10.1161/circoutcomes.11.suppl_1.219 Get It

Introduction: The DECIDE-LVAD Trial demonstrated the benefit of a decision support tool for patients considering destination-therapy left ventricular assist device (DT LVAD) implantation. We hypothesized that patients with low health literacy or numeracy may have benefited most from the intervention. Methods: We used the Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Medicine (REALM-R) and the Subjective Numeracy Scale (SNS) to assess patients’ health literacy and numeracy, respectively. A REALM-R score of six or less out of eight identified patients at risk for poor literacy based on the original measure validation. An SNS score less than four out of six identified patients with poor subjective numeracy based on the mean score of the DECIDE-LVAD cohort. We assessed the effect of the decision support tool on LVAD knowledge and values-treatment concordance—concordance between patients’ stated values and their treatment outcome of LVAD or continued medical therapy—and their interaction with health literacy and numeracy. This interaction was assessed using linear mixed models for LVAD knowledge and the difference in Kendall’s tau correlation coefficient for values-treatment concordance. Results: Of the 248 DECIDE-LVAD patients, 228 with complete literacy and numeracy data were analyzed: 51% (116) had high literacy and numeracy; 18 (8%) had low literacy and high numeracy; 55 (25%) had high literacy and low numeracy; 39 (17%) had low scores for both measures. Average age was 63, 15% were female, 19% were racial/ethnic minorities. Patients with high scores for both measures were older, had more formal education, and higher total household income compared to the other 3 groups. Patients with low literacy and/or numeracy had significantly lower LVAD knowledge scores at baseline. In all groups, LVAD knowledge improved over time. The difference in LVAD knowledge between those with low literacy and high literacy decreased over time (baseline difference 9.4%, p=0.002; 6 month follow-up difference 1.4%, p=0.65). In those with high literacy, the decision support tool intervention increased the LVAD knowledge score by 4.2% relative to the control (p=0.15), while in those with low literacy, the intervention increased the score by 10.6% (p=0.04). For patients with low literacy, values-treatment concordance improved with use of the decision support tool (control vs. intervention tau: 0.234 vs 0.673, p=0.028). We did not observe differences in the effect of the intervention by participant numeracy score. Conclusion: All patient groups in the DECIDE-LVAD cohort of patients considering DT LVAD had improved LVAD knowledge with the use of the decision support tool. We did not observe a differential effect of the intervention by numeracy score. Compared to those with higher health literacy, patients with low health literacy improved their LVAD knowledge and values-treatment concordance after the intervention.
Abstract 2578: Acceleration and Deceleration Slope of Longitudinal Early Mitral Annulus Velocity Distinguishes Primary from Secondary Constrictive Pericarditis
Dal‐Bianco, Jacob P. , Bellavia, Diego , Oh, Jae K. , Ling, Lieng Hsi , Barnes, Marion E.

Mayo Clinic

Circulation | July 3, 2021 | Volume: 116 | Issue: suppl_16 | Pages: No page available

10.1161/circ.116.suppl_16.ii_570-c Get It

Background: Assessment of coexisting pericardial and myocardial disease in constrictive pericarditis (CP) remains a diagnostic challenge and decision for pericardiectomy depends on the degree of pericardial versus myocardial restraint limiting left ventricular (LV) filling. Early diastolic longitudinal mitral annulus velocity (Ea) can help to differentiate CP from restrictive cardiomyopathy. Recently, acceleration rate of Ea has been shown to be an index of LV myocardial relaxation. We therefore assessed acceleration (Ea-AR) and deceleration (Ea-DR) rate of Ea in patients with CP before and after pericardiectomy. Methods: We retrospectively studied patients (n=42) with surgically confirmed CP who underwent radical pericardiectomy between 2003–2006 at Mayo Clinic Rochester. Ea-AR and Ea-DR slopes were measured before (pre-Echo) and after (post-Echo) pericardiectomy. Patients were divided into primary CP (idiopathic & acute pericarditis with presumed normal myocardial function) and secondary CP (cardiac surgery & chest irradiation with presumed abnormal myocardial function). Results: Ea-AR and Ea-DR changed significantly after pericardiectomy in primary CP patients, however remained similar in secondary CP patients. Diagnostic accuracy of Ea-AR, Ea-DR and Ea to discriminate primary versus secondary CP by ROC analysis was 0.88, 0.80 and 0.81 respectively. Conclusion: Assessment of Ea-AR and Ea-DR in patients with CP is useful to discriminate primary from secondary CP and may help to predict coexistence of myocardial disease: Prepericardiectomy Ea-AR and Ea-DR appear to reflect the interaction of intrinsic myocardial relaxation with enhanced early LV filling. The lack of decrease of Ea-AR and Ea-DR in patients with secondary CP seems to indicate a primarily restrictive component. The significant decrease of Ea-DR in patients with primary CP after pericardiectomy could reflect abolition of a predominant pericardial limitation to LV filling. Early Diastolic Longitudinal Mitral Annulus Motion before and after Pericardiectomy