Citations

Clear

407 citation(s) found for "Jones, David T".

Factors impacting oncologic outcomes after sublobar pulmonary resection: Results from ACOSOG Z4032 (Alliance), a randomized trial for high-risk operable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
Landreneau, Rodney J., Mandrekar, Sumithra J. , Nichols, Francis C., DiPetrillo, Thomas A., Meyers, Bryan F., Heron, Dwight E. , Daly, Benedict D.T., Tan, Angelina D., Kent, Michael Sean , Meyers, Bryan F. , Putnam, Joe B. , Jones, David R. , Starnes, Sandra Lynne , Fernando, Hiran C.

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Clinical Oncology | March 11, 2020 | Volume: 31 | Issue: 15_suppl | Pages: 7524-7524

10.1200/jco.2013.31.15_suppl.7524 Get It

7524 Background: A multicenter study (Z4032) compared sublobar resection (SR) to sublobar resection with brachytherapy (SRB) for stage I NSCLC. Local recurrence (LR) and overall survival (OS) rates at 3-years (3-yr) were similar between arms (see abstract 113613). This analysis combines arms, and evaluates the effect of factors previously reported to impact oncological outcomes after SR. Methods: 213 patients (pts) were evaluable for analysis. LR was defined as recurrence at the staple line (local progression), same lobe away from the staple line, or within hilar nodes. Factors assessed for impact on 3-yr outcomes were: resection type (wedge/segmentectomy), margin size (<1cm /≥1cm), margin:tumor ratio (<1/ ≥1), tumor size (≤2cm/>2cm) and staple line cytology (+/-). Results: LR occurred in 27/213 (12.6%) pts and included local progression in 12/213 (5.6%). OS rate at 3-yr was 152/213 (71.4%). Trends favored the use of segmentectomy, margin:tumor ratio≥1, tumor size ≤2cm and negative staple line cytology; no factor reached statistical significance at 3-yr. The only factor significantly (p=0.02) associated with decreased 3-yr LR was margin size ≥1cm (8.3%) compared to margin<1cm (19.3%). Conclusions: SR is a good option for high-risk pts with NSCLC. The 3-yr OS rate of 71.4% and local progression rate of 5.6% are useful benchmarks to compare to other therapies. A resection margin of at least 1 cm is desirable. Clinical trial information: NCT00107172. [Table: see text]
Impact of brachytherapy on local recurrence after sublobar resection: Results from ACOSOG Z4032 (Alliance), a phase III randomized trial for high-risk operable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
Landreneau, Rodney J., Mandrekar, Sumithra J. , Nichols, Francis C., Hillman, Shauna L., Heron, Dwight E. , Meyers, Bryan F., DiPetrillo, Thomas A., Tan, Angelina D., Daly, Benedict D.T., Fernando, Hiran C. , Meyers, Bryan F. , Jones, David R. , Starnes, Sandra Lynne , Putnam, Joe B.

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Clinical Oncology | March 11, 2020 | Volume: 31 | Issue: 15_suppl | Pages: 7502-7502

10.1200/jco.2013.31.15_suppl.7502 Get It

7502 Background: Prior studies suggest that adjuvant brachytherapy reduces local recurrence (LR) after sublobar resection (SR) for NSCLC. A multicenter randomized study was undertaken in patients (pts) with stage I NSCLC ≤3cm comparing SR to SR with brachytherapy (SRB). Methods: High-risk operable patients with NSCLC were randomized to SR or SRB. Brachytherapy involved placement of I125 seeds incorporated into Vicryl sutures or into Vicryl mesh placed over the staple line. Wedge or segmental resection was allowed. The primary endpoint was time to local recurrence (LR) defined as recurrence within the primary tumor lobe at the staple line (local progression), away from the staple line or within hilar nodes. The trial was designed to have 90% power to detect a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.315 in favor of the SRB arm using a one-sided α of 0.05 with a sample size of 100 eligible pts per arm. Follow-up CT scans were obtained serially for 36 months. Results: 224 pts were randomized; 213 (109 SR,104 SRB) were eligible. Median (range) age was 71 (49-87) yrs; 94 (44%) were male. No differences were found in baseline characteristics. Adverse events, previously reported, were not different between arms. Median (range) follow-up was 4.06 (0.04, 5.0) yrs. There was no difference between arms in time to LR (HR = 0.87; 5% CI: 0.41, 1.86, p=0.72) or to LR or death (LRD) (HR = 0.81, 95% CI: 0.50, 1.32, p=0.40). There was no difference between arms in pattern of LR (table). In subgroups of pts with potentially compromised surgical margin (margin < 1cm; margin:tumor ratio <1; positive staple line cytology) SRB did not reduce LR or LRD at 3-yrs. Overall 3-yr survival was similar for SR (71%) and SRB (72%) (p=0.81). Conclusions: LR remains a concern after sublobar resection. However, local progression at the staple line was low. This trial demonstrated that adjuvant brachytherapy does not impact oncologic outcomes. Clinical trial information: NCT00107172. [Table: see text]
Accuracy of FDG-PET to diagnose lung cancer in the ACOSOG Z4031 trial.
Grogan, Eric L. , Deppen, Stephen A. , Andrade, Gabriela M., Verdail, Francys C, Aldrich, Melinda C. , Chen, Heidi , Decker, Paul , Harpole, David H., Keenan, Robert J. , D’Amico, Thomas A., Shrager, Joseph B. , Meyers, Bryan F., Ballman, Karla V. , Cerfolio, Robert J. , Jones, David R. , Meyers, Bryan F. , Putnam, Joe B.

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Clinical Oncology | March 11, 2020 | Volume: 30 | Issue: 15_suppl | Pages: 7008-7008

10.1200/jco.2012.30.15_suppl.7008 Get It

7008 Background: Fluoro-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) is recommended for diagnosis and staging of known or suspected NSCLC. Meta-analyses examining the accuracy of FDG-PET to diagnose lung cancer demonstrated high sensitivity 94% and specificity 83% but were performed in select centers. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the accuracy of FDG-PET to diagnose NSCLC and examine enrolling site differences in the national prospective ACOSOG Z4031 trial. Methods: 1,074 patients with clinical stage I (cT1-2N0M0) known or suspected NSCLC were enrolled between 2004 and 2006 in the Z4031 study and underwent surgical resection. The final diagnosis was determined by pathological examination. FDG-PET results were abstracted from radiology interpretations included in the case report forms. FDG-PET avidity was categorized based on either radiologist description or reported maximum standard uptake value (SUV). The four categories were: not avid and not cancerous (SUV=0), low avidity and likely not cancerous (SUV>0 and <2.5), avid and probably cancerous (SUV>2.5 and <5) and highly avid and likely cancerous (SUV>5). Sensitivity analysis of FDG-PET diagnostic accuracy was performed for varying levels of avidity and by preoperative lesion size. Differences in accuracy by enrolling site were examined. Results: There were 51 enrolling sites in 39 cities with 969 eligible participants. Preoperative FDG-PET results were available for 682 participants. Lung cancer prevalence was 83%. FDG-PET sensitivity was 82% (95% CI: 79-85), and specificity was 31% (95% CI: 23-40). Positive and negative predictive values were 85% and 26%, respectively and accuracy improved with lesion size. There were 80 false positive scans and 69% were granulomas. False negative scans occurred in 101 patients (11were ≤10mm) with adenocarcinoma, squamous, bronchoalveolar cell and neuroendocrine tumors responsible for 64%, 12%, 10% and 8% of false negative results, respectively. Specificity did not differ between the 8 sites with >25 patients (p=0.74). Conclusions: In a national surgical population with clinical stage I NSCLC, FDG-PET to diagnose lung cancer performed poorly compared to published studies. Reasons for poor test performance should be explored.
Number of lymph nodes harvested from a mediastinal lymphadenectomy: Results of the randomized, prospective ACOSOG Z0030 trial
Darling, Gail , Decker, Paul A. , Malthaner, R, Inculet, Richard , McKenna, R. , Landreneau, Rodney J., Allen, Mark S. , Decker, Paul A. , Putnam, Joe B. , Jones, David R.

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Clinical Oncology | March 6, 2020 | Volume: 25 | Issue: 18_suppl | Pages: 7555-7555

10.1200/jco.2007.25.18_suppl.7555 Get It

7555 Background: Lymph node status is a major determinant of stage and survival in patients with lung cancer; however, little information is available about the yield of a mediastinal lymphadenectomy done at the time of pulmonary resection. Methods: The ACOSOG Z0030 trial is a prospective, randomized trial of mediastinal lymph node sampling versus complete mediastinal lymphadenectomy during an operation for early stage lung cancer. Total enrollment from July 1999 to February 2004 was 1,111 patients, of which 1,023 were eligible and/or evaluable. There were 524 patients who underwent complete mediastinal lymph node resection after randomization to this arm that were declared eligible and/or evaluable with lymph node data available. The number of lymph nodes examined from each station was collected beginning in January 2002. Prospectively collected data from these patients was analyzed to determine the number of lymph nodes obtained. Results: Median age was 67 (range 37–87) and 267 (52%) were men. Histology was squamous cell in 141 (27%), adenocarcinoma in 227 (44%), large cell in 22 (4%), bronchoavelolar in 32 (6%) and other non-small cell in 99 (19%). There were 317 right sided cancers and 207 left sided cancers. For lymphadenectomy for cancers in the right lung the yield from station 2R was a median of 2 lymph nodes (range 1 to 15), station 4R was 2 (1 –17), station 7 was 2 (1–24), station 8 was 1 (1–5), station 9 was 1 (1–6) and station 10R was 1 (1–10). For lymphadenectomy for cancers on the left side the yield from station 2L was 2 (1–4), station 4L was 1 (1–12), station 5 was 2 (1–18), station 6 was 2 (1–11), station 7 was 2 (1–16), station 8 was 1 (1–3), station 9 was 1 (1–8) and 10L was 2 (1–12). The total number of lymph nodes or fragments obtained for right sided cancers was a median of 13.5 (range 1 to 56) and for left sided tumors 15 (range 4 to 81). Conclusions: Although high variability exists in the actual number of lymph nodes obtained from various nodal stations, a complete mediastinal lymphadenectomy should obtain one or more lymph nodes from each mediastinal station. Adequate mediastinal lymphadenectomy should include exploration and remove of lymph nodes from stations 2R, 4R, 7, 8, and 9 for right sided cancers and stations 4L, 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9 for left sided cancers. No significant financial relationships to disclose.
Comparison of sporadic and familial behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (FTD) in a North American cohort
Heuer, Hilary W. , Wang, P., Rascovsky, Katya, Bove, Jessica, Bordelon, Yvette , Brannelly, Patrick , Brushaber, Danielle , Caso, Christine, Coppola, Giovanni , Dickerson, Brad C., Dickinson, Susan, Domoto‐Reilly, Kimiko , Faber, Kelley , Ferrall, Jessica, Fields, Julie A. , Fishman, Ann, Forsberg, Leah K. , Gearhart, Debra, Ghazanfari, Behnaz, Ghoshal, Nupur , Graff‐Radford, Jonathan , Graff-Radford, N. R., Grant, Ian , Haley, Dana , Hsiung, Ging‐Yuek Robin , Huey, Edward D. , Irwin, David J. , Kantarci, Kejal , Karydas, Anna, Kaufer, Daniel , Kornak, John , Kramer, Joel H. , Kraft, Ruth, Kremers, Walter K. , Kukull, Walter A. , Ljubenkov, Peter A. , Mackenzie, Ian R. , Maldonado, Miranda, Manoochehri, Masood , McGinnis, Scott, McKinley, Emily , Mendez, Mario F. , Miller, Bruce L. , Onyike, Chiadi U. , Pantelyat, Alexander , Pearlman, Rodney , Petrucelli, Leonard , Rademakers, Rosa , Ramos, Eliana Marisa , Rankin, Katherine P. , Roberson, Erik D. , Rogalskı, Emily , Sengdy, Pheth, Shaw, Leslie M. , Syrjanen, Jeremy A. , Tartaglia, Maria Carmela , Tatton, Nadine , Taylor, Joanne, Trojanowski, John Q. , Weıntraub, Sandra , Wong, Bonnie , Rosen, Howard J. , Boxer, Adam L. , consortia, on behalf of the ARTFL and LEFFTDS, Irwin, David J , Hsiung, Gink-Yuek , Roberson, Erik , Miller, Bruce L , Kantarci, Kejal , Pantelyat, Alex , Tartaglia, Maria Carmela , Kremers, Walter K , Domoto-Reilly, Kimiko , Wolf, A., Appleby, Brian S. , Fong, Jamie , Foroud, Tatiana , Goldman, Jill , Grossman, Murray , Jones, David T. , Kerwin, Diana , Knopman, David S. , Litvan, Irene , Potter, M., Toga, Arthur W. , Wszołek, Zbigniew K. , Boeve, Bradley F. , consortia, on behalf of the ARTFL and LEFFTDS

Mayo Clinic

Alzheimer's & Dementia | January 16, 2020 | Volume: 16 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 60-70

10.1002/alz.12046 | PMID 31914226 Get It

AbstractIntroductionBehavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) may present sporadically or due to an autosomal dominant mutation. Characterization of both forms will improve understanding of the generalizability of assessments and treatments.MethodsA total of 135 sporadic (s‐bvFTD; mean age 63.3 years; 34% female) and 99 familial (f‐bvFTD; mean age 59.9; 48% female) bvFTD participants were identified. f‐bvFTD cases included 43 with known or presumed chromosome 9 open reading frame 72 (C9orf72) gene expansions, 28 with known or presumed microtubule‐associated protein tau (MAPT) mutations, 14 with known progranulin (GRN) mutations, and 14 with a strong family history of FTD but no identified mutation.ResultsParticipants with f‐bvFTD were younger and had earlier age at onset. s‐bvFTD had higher total Neuropsychiatric Inventory Questionnaire (NPI‐Q) scores due to more frequent endorsement of depression and irritability.Discussionf‐bvFTD and s‐bvFTD cases are clinically similar, suggesting the generalizability of novel biomarkers, therapies, and clinical tools developed in either form to the other.
Utility of the global CDR® plus NACC FTLD rating and development of scoring rules: Data from the ARTFL/LEFFTDS Consortium
Miyagawa, Toji , Brushaber, Danielle , Syrjanen, Jeremy A. , Kremers, Walter K. , Fields, Julie A. , Forsberg, Leah K. , Heuer, Hilary W. , Kornak, John , Boxer, Adam L. , Rosen, Howard J. , Bordelon, Yvette , Bove, Jessica, Brannelly, Patrick , Caso, Christina, Coppola, Giovanni , Dever, Reilly, Dheel, Christina, Dickinson, Susan, Domínguez, S. Carbajal, Domoto‐Reilly, Kimiko , Faber, Kelley , Ferrell, Jessica, Fishman, Ann, Gavrilova, Ralitza H. , Gearhart, Debra, Ghazanfari, Behnaz, Ghoshal, Nupur , Graff‐Radford, Jonathan , Graff‐Radford, Neill R. , Grant, Ian , Haley, Dana , Hsiung, Ging‐Yuek Robin , Huey, Edward D. , Irwin, David J. , Jones, Lynne C. , Kantarci, Kejal , Karydas, Anna, Kaufer, Daniel , Kraft, Ruth, Kramer, Joel H. , Kukull, Walter A. , Lucente, Diane , Lungu, Codrin , Mackenzie, Ian R. , Maldonado, Miranda, Manoochehri, Masood , McGinnis, Scott, McKinley, Emily , Mendez, Mario F. , Miller, Bruce L. , Multani, Namita, Onyike, Chiadi U. , Padmanabhan, Jaya , Pantelyat, Alexander , Pearlman, Rodney , Petrucelli, Leonard , Potter, Madeline, Rademakers, Rosa , Ramos, Eliana Marisa , Rankin, Kate, Rascovsky, Katya, Roberson, Erik D. , Rogalskı, Emily , Sengdy, Pheth, Shaw, Leslie M. , Tartaglia, Maria Carmela , Tatton, Nadine , Taylor, Joanne, Toga, Arthur W. , Trojanowski, John Q. , Wang, Ping , Weıntraub, Sandra , Wong, Bonnie , Irwin, David J , Hsiung, Gink-Yuek , Roberson, Erik , Miller, Bruce L , Kantarci, Kejal , Pantelyat, Alex , Tartaglia, Maria Carmela , Kremers, Walter K , Domoto-Reilly, Kimiko , Knopman, David S. , Boeve, Bradley F. , Appleby, Brian S. , Dickerson, Bradford Clark , Fong, Jamie , Foroud, Tatiana , Goldman, Jill , Grossman, Murray , Jones, David T. , Jones, Lynne, Kerwin, Diana , Litvan, Irene , Wszołek, Zbigniew K.

Mayo Clinic

Alzheimer's & Dementia | January 16, 2020 | Volume: 16 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 106-117

10.1002/alz.12033 | PMID 31914218 Get It

AbstractIntroductionWe created global rating scoring rules for the CDR® plus NACC FTLD to detect and track early frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) and to conduct clinical trials in FTLD.MethodsThe CDR plus NACC FTLD rating was applied to 970 sporadic and familial participants from the baseline visit of Advancing Research and Treatment in Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration (ARTFL)/Longitudinal Evaluation of Familial Frontotemporal Dementia Subjects (LEFFTDS). Each of the eight domains of the CDR plus NACC FTLD was equally weighed in determining the global score. An interrater reliability study was completed for 40 participants.ResultsThe CDR plus NACC FTLD showed very good interrater reliability. It was especially useful in detecting clinical features of mild non‐fluent/agrammatic variant primary progressive aphasia participants.DiscussionThe global CDR plus NACC FTLD score could be an attractive outcome measure for clinical trials in symptomatic FTLD, and may be useful in natural history studies and clinical trials in FTLD spectrum disorders.
Nonlinear Z‐score modeling for improved detection of cognitive abnormality
Kornak, John , Fields, Julie A. , Kremers, Walter K. , Farmer, Sara A., Heuer, Hilary W. , Forsberg, Leah K. , Brushaber, Danielle , Rindels, Amy, Weıntraub, Sandra , Besser, Lilah M., Bordelon, Yvette , Bove, Jessica, Brannelly, Patrick , Caso, Christina, Coppola, Giovanni , Dever, Reilly, Dheel, Christina, Dickerson, Bradford, Dickinson, Susan, Domínguez, S. Carbajal, Domoto‐Reilly, Kimiko , Faber, Kelley , Ferrall, Jessica, Fishman, Ann, Gavrilova, Ralitza H. , Gearhart, Deb, Ghazanfari, Behnaz, Ghoshal, Nupur , Graff‐Radford, Jonathan , Graff‐Radford, Neill R. , Grant, Ian , Haley, Dana , Hsiao, John , Hsiung, Ging‐Yuek Robin , Huey, Edward D. , Irwin, David J. , Jones, Lynne C. , Kantarci, Kejal , Karydas, Anna, Kaufer, Daniel , Kraft, Ruth, Kramer, Joel H. , Kukull, Walter A. , Ljubenkov, Peter A. , Lucente, Diane , Lungu, Codrin , Mackenzie, Ian R. , Maldonado, Miranda, Manoochehri, Masood , McGinnis, Scott, McKinley, Emily , Mendez, Mario F. , Miller, Bruce L. , Multani, Namita, Onyike, Chiadi U. , Pantelyat, Alexander , Pearlman, Rodney , Petrucelli, Len, Potter, Madeline, Rademakers, Rosa , Ramos, Eliana Marisa , Rankin, Katherine P. , Rascovsky, Katya, Roberson, Erik D. , Rogalski-Miller, Emily, Sengdy, Pheth, Shaw, Les, Staffaroni, Adam M. , Sutherland, Margaret , Syrjanen, Jeremy A. , Tartaglia, Maria Carmela , Tatton, Nadine , Taylor, Joanne, Trojanowski, John Q. , Wong, Bonnie , Boxer, Adam L. , Rosen, Howard J. , Farmer, Sara, Irwin, David J , Hsiung, Gink-Yuek , Roberson, Erik , Miller, Bruce L , Kantarci, Kejal , Pantelyat, Alex , Tartaglia, Maria Carmela , Kremers, Walter K , Domoto-Reilly, Kimiko , Dodge, Hiroko Hayama , Appleby, Brian S. , Fong, Jamie , Foroud, Tatiana , Gearhart, Deb, Goldman, Jill , Grossman, Murray , Jones, David T. , Jones, Lynne, Kerwin, Diana , Knopman, David S. , Lapid, Maria I. , Litvan, Irene , Padmanabhan, Jaya , Toga, Arthur W. , Wang, Ping , Wszołek, Zbigniew K. , Boeve, Bradley F.

Mayo Clinic

Alzheimer's & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring | December 5, 2019 | Volume: 11 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 797-808

10.1016/j.dadm.2019.08.003 | PMID 31872042 Get It

AbstractIntroductionConventional Z‐scores are generated by subtracting the mean and dividing by the standard deviation. More recent methods linearly correct for age, sex, and education, so that these “adjusted” Z‐scores better represent whether an individual's cognitive performance is abnormal. Extreme negative Z‐scores for individuals relative to this normative distribution are considered indicative of cognitive deficiency.MethodsIn this article, we consider nonlinear shape constrained additive models accounting for age, sex, and education (correcting for nonlinearity). Additional shape constrained additive models account for varying standard deviation of the cognitive scores with age (correcting for heterogeneity of variance).ResultsCorrected Z‐scores based on nonlinear shape constrained additive models provide improved adjustment for age, sex, and education, as indicated by higher adjusted‐R2.DiscussionNonlinearly corrected Z‐scores with respect to age, sex, and education with age‐varying residual standard deviation allow for improved detection of non‐normative extreme cognitive scores.
Tau‐positron emission tomography correlates with neuropathology findings
Lowe, Val J. , Lundt, Emily S. , Albertson, Sabrina M., Min, Hoon‐Ki , Fang, Ping , Przybelski, Scott A. , Senjem, Matthew L. , Kantarci, Kejal , Reichard, R. Ross , Tranovich, Jessica F., Al‐Shaikh, Fadi S. Hanna , Petersen, Ronald C. , Murray, Melissa E. , Hanna Al-Shaikh, Fadi S, Min, Hoon-Ki Paul , Senjem, Matthew L , Kantarci, Kejal , Murray, Melissa E , Schwarz, Christopher G. , Boeve, Bradley F. , Jones, David T. , Knopman, David S. , Jack, Clifford R. , Dickson, Dennis W. , Lundt, Emily S

Mayo Clinic

Alzheimer's & Dementia | November 26, 2019 | Volume: 16 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 561-571

10.1016/j.jalz.2019.09.079 | PMID 31784374 Get It

AbstractIntroductionComparison of tau (flortaucipir) positron emission tomography (FTP‐PET) to autopsy is important to demonstrate the relationship of FTP‐PET to neuropathologic findings.MethodsAutopsies were performed on 26 participants who had antemortem FTP‐PET. FTP‐PET standardized uptake value ratios (SUVRs) were compared to autopsy diagnoses and Braak tangle stage. Quantitative tau burden was compared to regional FTP‐PET signal.ResultsParticipants with Braak stages of IV or greater had elevated FTP‐PET signal. FTP‐PET was elevated in participants with Alzheimer's disease. An FTP‐PET SUVR cut point of 1.29 was determined to be optimal. Quantitative measurements of hippocampal and temporal lobe tau burden were highly correlated to FTP‐PET signal (rho's from 0.61 to 0.70, P ≤ .02).DiscussionElevated FTP‐PET reflects Braak IV or greater neuropathology. Participants with primary age‐related tauopathy and hippocampal sclerosis did not show elevated FTP‐PET signal. Secondary neuropathologic diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease neuropathologic change can lead to borderline elevated FTP‐PET signal.
Clinical and volumetric changes with increasing functional impairment in familial frontotemporal lobar degeneration
Olney, Nicholas , Ong, Elise, Goh, Sheng‐Yang M., Bajorek, Lynn, Dever, Reilly, Staffaroni, Adam M. , Bock, Meredith , Chiang, Kevin, Ljubenkov, Peter A. , Kornak, John , Heuer, Hilary W. , Rascovsky, Katya, Wolf, Amelia, Bove, Jessica, Bordelon, Yvette , Brannelly, Patrick , Brushaber, Danielle , Caso, Christine, Coppola, Giovanni , Dickinson, Susan, Domoto‐Reilly, Kimiko , Faber, Kelly, Ferrall, Jessica, Fields, Julie A. , Fishman, Ann, Foroud, Tatiana M., Forsberg, Leah K. , Gearhart, Debra, Ghazanfari, Behnaz, Ghoshal, Nupur , Graff‐Radford, Jonathan, Graff‐Radford, Neill R. , Grant, Ian , Haley, Dana , Hsiung, Ging‐Yuek Robin , Huey, Edward D. , Irwin, David J. , Kantarci, Kejal , Karydas, Anna M., Kaufer, Daniel , Kramer, Joel H. , Kraft, Ruth, Kremers, Walter K. , Kukull, Walter A. , Mackenzie, Ian R. , Maldonado, Miranda, Manoochehri, Masood , McGinnis, Scott M., McKinley, Emily , Mendez, Mario F. , Miller, Bruce L. , Onyike, Chiadi U. , Pantelyat, Alexander , Pearlman, Rodney , Petrucelli, Len, Potter, Madeleine, Rademakers, Rosa , Ramos, Eliana Marisa , Rankin, Katherine P. , Roberson, Erik D. , Rogalskı, Emily , Sengdy, Pheth, Shaw, Leslie M. , Syrjanen, Jeremy A. , Tartaglia, Maria Carmela , Tatton, Nadine , Taylor, Joanne, Trojanowski, John Q. , Weıntraub, Sandra , Wong, Bonnie , Boxer, Adam L. , Rosen, Howard J. , consortia, on behalf of the ARTFL and LEFFTDS, Gearhart, Debra J, Boeve, Brad F, Irwin, David J , Hsiung, Gink-Yuek , Roberson, Erik , Miller, Bruce L , Kantarci, Kejal , Pantelyat, Alex , Tartaglia, Maria Carmela , Kremers, Walter K , Domoto-Reilly, Kimiko , Cobigo, Yann , Wang, Ping , Appleby, Brian S. , Dickerson, Bradford Clark , Fong, Jamie , Goldman, Jill , Graff‐Radford, Jonathan , Grossman, Murray , Jones, David T. , Kerwin, Diana , Knopman, David S. , Lapid, Maria I. , Litvan, Irene , Potter, Madeleine, Toga, Arthur W. , Wszołek, Zbigniew K. , Boeve, Bradley F. , consortia, on behalf of the ARTFL and LEFFTDS

Mayo Clinic

Alzheimer's & Dementia | November 26, 2019 | Volume: 16 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 49-59

10.1016/j.jalz.2019.08.196 | PMID 31784375 Get It

AbstractIntroductionThe Advancing Research and Treatment in Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration and Longitudinal Evaluation of Familial Frontotemporal Dementia Subjects longitudinal studies were designed to describe the natural history of familial‐frontotemporal lobar degeneration due to autosomal dominant mutations.MethodsWe examined cognitive performance, behavioral ratings, and brain volumes from the first time point in 320 MAPT, GRN, and C9orf72 family members, including 102 non–mutation carriers, 103 asymptomatic carriers, 43 mildly/questionably symptomatic carriers, and 72 carriers with dementia.ResultsAsymptomatic carriers showed similar scores on all clinical measures compared with noncarriers but reduced frontal and temporal volumes. Those with mild/questionable impairment showed decreased verbal recall, fluency, and Trail Making Test performance and impaired mood and self‐monitoring. Dementia was associated with impairment in all measures. All MAPT carriers with dementia showed temporal atrophy, but otherwise, there was no single cognitive test or brain region that was abnormal in all subjects.DiscussionImaging changes appear to precede clinical changes in familial‐frontotemporal lobar degeneration, but specific early clinical and imaging changes vary across individuals.