Citations

Clear

338 citation(s) found for "Suman, VJ".

Abstract 1033: Estrogen receptor gene fusions drive endocrine therapy resistance in estrogen receptor positive breast cancer
Shao, Jieya , Iglesia, Michael D. , Chan, Doug W. , Matsunuma, Ryoichi , He, Xiaping , Singh, Purba , Kosaka, Yoshimasa , Crowder, Robert J., Haricharan, Svasti , Kavuri, Shyam M. , Phommaly, Chanpheng, Gonçalves, Rodrigo , Romalho, Susana, Lai, W. Victoria , Rogers, Anna , Tobias, Ethan, Parikh, P.J., Cynthia, X. , Thompson, Aubrey, Creighton, Chad J. , Lei, Jonathan T. , Zhang, Jin , Hoog, Jeremy , Hampton, Oliver , Davies, Sherri R. , Suman, Vera J. , Hunt, Kelly K. , Watson, Mark A. , Hoadley, Katherine A. , Perou, Charles M. , Maher, Christopher G. , Ellis, Matthew J.

Mayo Clinic

Cancer Research | July 31, 2017 | Volume: 77 | Issue: 13_Supplement | Pages: 1033-1033

10.1158/1538-7445.am2017-1033 Get It

Abstract Dysregulation of estrogen receptor gene (ESR1) is an established mechanism of inducing endocrine therapy resistance. We previously discovered a chromosomal translocation event generating an estrogen receptor gene fused in-frame to C-terminal sequences of YAP1 (ESR1-YAP1) that contributed to endocrine therapy resistance in estrogen receptor positive (ER+) breast cancer models. This current study compares functional and pharmacological properties of additional ESR1 gene fusion events of both early stage (ESR1-NOP2) and advanced endocrine therapy resistant (ESR1-YAP1 and ESR1-PCDH11x) breast cancers. The YAP1 and PCDH11x fusions conferred estrogen-independent and fulvestrant-resistant growth in T47D, an ER+ breast cancer cell line in vitro and in vivo, in contrast to the NOP2 fusion which was sensitive to hormone deprivation. Immunohistochemical (IHC) staining of mouse lungs revealed significantly higher numbers of micrometastatic ER+ cells from the T47D tumors expressing the YAP1 and PCDH11x fusions than YFP control and NOP2 fusion. Estrogen response element (ERE) reporter and pull down assays revealed that although all ESR1 fusions studied bound EREs, only the YAP1 and PCDH11x caused ERE activation. Cell lines containing these “canonical” ESR1 fusions upregulated expression of ER responsive genes such as TFF1 and GREB1 in hormone deprived conditions. In contrast, the NOP2 fusion neither induced ERE activity nor upregulated TFF1 and GREB1 gene expression. The proliferative ability of canonical fusion-containing T47D cells was inhibited by palbociclib, a CDK4/6 inhibitor, in a dose-dependent manner. In vivo growth of patient-derived xenograft tumors naturally harboring the ESR1-YAP1 fusion (WHIM18) was significantly reduced in mice fed palbociclib-containing chow. Mice transplanted with WHIM18 also formed lung micrometastases, with an ER IHC staining pattern similar to lungs from YAP1 and PCDH11x fusion expressing T47D xenografts. In conclusion, in-frame ERE activating canonical fusions occur in end-stage, drug resistant, advanced breast cancer and can be added to ESR1 point mutations as a class of somatic mutation that may cause acquired resistance. Endocrine therapy resistant growth induced by these fusions can be treated with CDK4/6 inhibition, using an FDA approved drug, palbociclib, which could potentially improve outcomes in patients with ESR1 translocated tumors. Citation Format: Jonathan T. Lei, Jieya Shao, Jin Zhang, Michael Iglesia, Doug W. Chan, Ryoichi Matsunuma, Xiaping He, Purba Singh, Yoshimasa Kosaka, Robert Crowder, Svasti Haricharan, Shyam Kavuri, Jeremy Hoog, Chanpheng Phommaly, Rodrigo Goncalves, Susana Romalho, Wei-Chu Lai, Oliver Hampton, Anna Rogers, Ethan Tobias, Poojan Parikh, Sherri Davies, Cynthia Ma, Vera Suman, Kelly Hunt, Mark Watson, Katherine A. Hoadley, Aubrey Thompson, Charles Perou, Chad J. Creighton, Chris Maher, Matthew J. Ellis. Estrogen receptor gene fusions drive endocrine therapy resistance in estrogen receptor positive breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2017; 2017 Apr 1-5; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 1033. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-1033
Serum Soluble Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Concentrations Decrease in Postmenopausal Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients Treated with Letrozole
Lafky, Jacqueline M., Cora, Elsa M., Perez, Edith A. , Maihle, Nita J. , Baron, Andre T. , Hillman, David W. , Suman, Vera J. , Ingle, James N.

Mayo Clinic

Cancer Research | July 21, 2017 | Volume: 65 | Issue: 8 | Pages: 3059-3062

10.1158/0008-5472.can-05-0067 | PMID 15833834 Get It

Abstract Previous studies have implicated estrogen as a regulator of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) expression in breast tumors. We therefore speculated that estrogen might modulate serologic soluble EGFR (sEGFR) concentrations in breast cancer patients. Accordingly, we measured serum sEGFR concentrations in postmenopausal women with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) treated with letrozole, an aromatase inhibitor that blocks estrogen synthesis. Serum specimens were obtained prior to and following 1 and 3 months of letrozole therapy. We report that sEGFR concentrations do not differ between MBC patients prior to letrozole treatment and age- and postmenopause-matched healthy women (P = 0.468). In contrast, however, sEGFR concentrations decreased significantly in 76% of MBC patients after both 1 month (P = 0.006) and 3 months (P = 0.003) of letrozole therapy versus pretreatment concentrations. Within the limitations of this study, we found no evidence for an association between pretreatment sEGFR concentrations or decreased treatment sEGFR concentrations and either progression-free or overall survival. Nonetheless, we conclude that future prospective studies are warranted to determine if baseline and/or longitudinal serum sEGFR concentrations may be useful for predicting disease progression and survival, and/or for monitoring responsiveness to aromatase inhibitors or other endocrine therapies in breast cancer patients.
Newly Diagnosed Bulbar Urethral Strictures: Etiology and Outcome of Various Treatments
Stormont, Thomas J., Oesterling, Joseph E., Suman, Vera J.

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Urology | June 30, 2017 | Volume: 150 | Issue: 5 Part 2 | Pages: 1725-1728

10.1016/s0022-5347(17)35879-2 | PMID 8411459 Get It

Preoperative Androgen Deprivation Therapy: Artificial Lowering of Serum Prostate Specific Antigen without Downstaging the Tumor
Oesterling, Joseph E., Andrews, Paul E. , Zincke, Horst, Myers, Robert P., Suman, Vera J.

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Urology | June 30, 2017 | Volume: 149 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 779-782

10.1016/s0022-5347(17)36206-7 | PMID 7681117 Get It

HER2 testing by local, central, and reference laboratories in the NCCTG N9831 Intergroup Adjuvant Trial
Perez, Edith A. , Davidson, Nancy E. , Martino, Silvana, Lingle, Wilma L., Flynn, Patrick J. , Visscher, Daniel W., Jenkins, Robert B. , Suman, Vera J. , Kaufman, Peter A. , Ingle, James N.

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Clinical Oncology | April 5, 2017 | Volume: 22 | Issue: 14_suppl | Pages: 567-567

10.1200/jco.2004.22.90140.567 Get It

A phase II study of aerosolized GM-CSF in the treatment of metastatic melanoma to the lung
Dalton, Robert J., Allred, Jacob B., Nevala, Wendy K. , Fitch, Tom R., Egner, James R., Ebbert, Larry P., Markovic, Svetomir N. , Suman, Vera J. , Celis, Esteban , Alberts, Steven R.

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Clinical Oncology | April 5, 2017 | Volume: 22 | Issue: 14_suppl | Pages: 7571-7571

10.1200/jco.2004.22.90140.7571 Get It

Abstract PD2-06: Mismatch repair deficiency induces endocrine therapy resistance in breast cancer
Haricharan, Svasti , Schmelz, Jacob , Schmidt, Cecilia, Singh, Purba , Holloway, K, Suman, VJ, Olson, JA, Bainbridge, MN, Ellis, MJ, Anurag, Meenakshi , Hunt, K

Mayo Clinic

Cancer Research | March 1, 2017 | Volume: 77 | Issue: 4_Supplement | Pages: PD2-06-PD2-06

10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs16-pd2-06 Get It

Abstract Estrogen receptor positive (ER+) breast cancer accounts for the majority of breast cancers diagnosed worldwide but fortunately, outcomes are markedly improved by pharmacological interventions that interrupt ER function. Unfortunately, suppression of relapse risk from early stage disease with endocrine therapy (anti-estrogens or aromatase inhibitors) is only ∼50%, and for advanced disease, pan endocrine therapy resistance is almost inevitable. While many mechanisms for intrinsic and acquired endocrine resistance have been explored, links between defects in DNA repair, the fundamental drivers of cancer pathogenesis, and endocrine therapy resistance have been understudied. Here we link mismatch repair (MMR) deficiency to poor clinical outcomes in ER+ breast cancer using whole exome DNA sequencing data and mRNA expression analysis. We subsequently demonstrate that MMR deficiency bypasses ER dependent cell cycle regulation through disruption of Chk2/p21-mediated feedback inhibition of CDK4 in breast cancer cell lines and tumor samples, as well as through correlations with human clinical data. We also show that pharmacological targeting of CDK4 significantly inhibits growth of MMR-deficient ER+ breast cancer cells in vitro and in vivo. This mechanism provides a new explanation for why endocrine therapy resistant ER+ breast cancers can respond to CDK inhibition and suggests that primary tumors exhibiting MMR deficiency are good candidates for adjuvant CDK4 inhibitor treatment. Citation Format: Haricharan S, Schmelz J, Schmidt C, Singh P, Holloway K, Anurag M, Suman V, Olson JA, Hunt K, Bainbridge MN, Ellis MJ. Mismatch repair deficiency induces endocrine therapy resistance in breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2016 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2016 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD2-06.
Abstract PD2-03: Recurrent functionally diverse in-frame ESR1 gene fusions drive endocrine resistance in breast cancer
Lei, JT, Shao, Juntao , Zhang, J, Iglesia, Michael D. , Cao, Jin , He, Xiaoping , Kosaka, Yoshimasa , Schmidt, Cecilia, Matsunuma, Ryoichi , Haricharan, Svasti , Crowder, RJ, Hoog, J, Phommaly, Chanpheng, Gonçalves, Rodrigo , Ramalho, Susana , Lai, W-C, Rogers, Anna , Tobias, Ethan, Parikh, Poojan A., Davies, S. J. , Hunt, Katie N. , Watson, Mark , Hoadley, KA, Thompson, Alastair M. , Chen, X , Perou, CM, Creighton, CJ, Maher, CA, Ellis, MJ, Maher, Christopher G. , Chan, David W. , Hampton, Oliver , Ma, C, Suman, Vera J. , Watson, M, Hoadley, Katherine A.

Mayo Clinic

Cancer Research | March 1, 2017 | Volume: 77 | Issue: 4_Supplement | Pages: PD2-03-PD2-03

10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs16-pd2-03 Get It

Abstract Background. We previously reported an alternative ESR1 somatic gain-of-function chromosomal translocation event in a patient presenting with aggressive, endocrine therapy resistant estrogen receptor (ER) positive disease, producing an in-frame fusion gene consisting of N-terminal ESR1 and the C-terminus of the Hippo pathway coactivator YAP1 (ESR1-YAP1). We recently identified another ESR1 fusion through RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) in advanced stage ER+ disease from a chest wall recurrence in a male patient that was refractory to multiple lines of treatment. Two examples of fusions discovered in primary breast cancer samples include ESR1 fused in-frame to C-terminal sequences from NOP2 (ESR1-NOP2), identified in a resistant cohort from a RNA-seq screen focused on 81 primary breast cancers from aromatase inhibitor clinical trials, and a second ESR1 fusion, fused in-frame to the entire coding sequence of POLH (ESR1-POLH), that was identified from RNA-seq analysis of 728 Cancer Genome Atlas breast samples. This current study extends our previous characterization of ESR1-YAP1 by comparing functional and pharmacological properties of these three additional ESR1 gene fusion events of both early stage and advanced breast cancers. Methods. In vitro and in vivo experiments were conducted to test ESR1 fusions to induce therapeutic resistance, and metastasis. The transcriptional and binding properties of each fusion was also examined. Pharmacological inhibition with Palbociclib, a cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor, was utilized to assess drug sensitivity in ESR1 fusion containing breast cancer cells and in a patient derived xenograft (PDX) model expressing ESR1-YAP1 (WHIM18). Results. The YAP1 and PCDH11x fusions conferred estrogen-independent and fulvestrant-resistant growth. Immunohistochemistry revealed significantly higher numbers of ER+ cells in lungs of mice xenografted with T47D cells expressing the YAP1 and PCDH11x fusions compared to YFP control, NOP2 and POLH fusions. Results from ChIP-seq and microarray studies suggest that these two fusions promote proliferation and metastasis through genomic action by binding estrogen response elements (ERE) and subsequent gene activation. We thereby define these fusions as “canonical” fusions compared to “non-canonical” NOP2 and POLH fusions, which demonstrated dramatically decreased genomic binding ability. The non-canonical fusions induced genes associated with basal-like breast cancer and promoted HER2, EGFR, and MAPK gene expression signatures in contrast to genes associated with cell cycle/proliferation induced by canonical fusions. The proliferative ability of canonical fusion-containing ER+ cells was inhibited by Palbociclib in a dose-dependent manner. In vivo WHIM18 tumors in mice fed with Palbociclib-containing chow demonstrated significantly reduced tumor volume, growth rate, and weight compared to tumors in mice on control chow. Conclusions. In-frame ERE activating canonical fusions occur in end-stage drug resistant advanced breast cancer and can be added to ESR1 point mutations as a class of recurrent somatic mutation that may cause acquired resistance. Growth induced by these fusions can be antagonized by Palbociclib and is potentially clinically helpful. Citation Format: Lei JT, Shao J, Zhang J, Iglesia M, Cao J, Chan DW, He X, Kosaka Y, Schmidt C, Matsunuma R, Haricharan S, Crowder R, Hoog J, Phommaly C, Goncalves R, Ramalho S, Lai W-C, Hampton O, Rogers A, Tobias E, Parikh P, Davies S, Ma C, Suman V, Hunt K, Watson M, Hoadley KA, Thompson A, Chen X, Perou CM, Creighton CJ, Maher C, Ellis MJ. Recurrent functionally diverse in-frame ESR1 gene fusions drive endocrine resistance in breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2016 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2016 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD2-03.
Abstract P2-02-03: Optimized prediction of deleterious missense mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes
Hart, SN, Lindor, NM, Monteiro, Augusta , Iversen, Edwin S. , Goldgar, DE, Couch, FJ, Hoskin, Tanya L. , Shimelis, Hermela , Feng, Bing , Suman, Vera J.

Mayo Clinic

Cancer Research | March 1, 2017 | Volume: 77 | Issue: 4_Supplement | Pages: P2-02-03-P2-02-03

10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs16-p2-02-03 Get It

Abstract Approximately 15% of genetic screens for mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 identify Variants of Uncertain Significance (VUS). Primarily missense mutations, VUS are often difficult to interpret, leading to either uncertainty in how to properly counsel a patient or an unnecessary prophylactic surgery. Given the paucity of data for which missenses are classified as truly pathogenic, computational deleterious missense prediction (DMP) algorithms are used to predict whether a mutation is likely deleterious or neutral. Accuracy of DMPs can vary considerably and have only been calibrated on a relatively small number of missense mutations of demonstrable effect on protein function. In this study, the performance of 41 different DMPs was compared to functional data from 455 functionally characterized missense variants in BRCA1 and BRCA2. New optimized thresholds for classifying missense mutations as deleterious are presented for several existing models as well as a newly derived naïve voting method (NVM). The areas under the curve estimates for the NVM approach are between 0.889-0.922, much higher than previous methods. We estimate that the overall pathogenic potential of missense variants to be 6.8% for BRCA1 and 3.2% of BRCA2, but can be as high as 50% depending on protein location. Overall these results provide key insights into how to predict deleterious missense mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2. Citation Format: Hart SN, Hoskin T, Shimelis H, Feng B, Lindor NM, Monteiro A, Iversen E, Goldgar DE, Suman V, Couch FJ. Optimized prediction of deleterious missense mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2016 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2016 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-02-03.
Abstract P1-08-03: Identification and characterization of a novel endoxifen substrate, PKCβ1, and its interaction with the estrogen receptor
Kuffel, MJ, Kudgus, RA, Huang, Zheng , Bode, AM, Cheng, Jingwei , Suman, VJ, Reid, J. J., Bruinsma, ES, Subramaniam, Malayannan , Ames, M, Hawse, JR, Goetz, MP, Guo, C, Kuffel, Mary J., Kudgus, Rachel A.

Mayo Clinic

Cancer Research | March 1, 2017 | Volume: 77 | Issue: 4_Supplement | Pages: P1-08-03-P1-08-03

10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs16-p1-08-03 Get It

Abstract Background: The primary mechanism by which tamoxifen (Tam) and its metabolites exert their biologic effects is through estrogen receptor (ER) binding and inhibition of ER signaling. We and others demonstrated that endoxifen (Endx) has greater antitumor activity in vitro and in vivo compared to Tam and the first-in-human Endx phase I study demonstrated its antitumor activity in patients with prior progression on Tam (Goetz SABC 2015). PKCs are a family of serine/threonine-specific protein kinases that regulate signaling pathways involved in cell proliferation and tumorigenic transformation. Our prior protein docking studies suggested endoxifen may be a substrate for PKCs. Here we report the effects of Tam and Endx on PKCβ1 binding, kinase activity, as well as interactions between PKCβ1 and ERα. Methods: Surface Plasmon Resonance (SPR, Biacore T200, GE Healthcare) was used to evaluate binding of Tam, N-desmethyl Tam (NDMT), 4-HT, and Endx to PKCβ1 and PKCβ2. The effects of Tam and Endx on PKCβ1 kinase activity were determined. Proliferation and colony formation in MCF7 parental and PKCβ1 overexpressing cells were evaluated. siRNA silencing was used to knockdown PKCβ1 expression in the following cells: MCF7 aromatase expressing cells that were either sensitive (MCF7/AC1) or resistant to letrozole (MCF7/AC1 L-resistant); T47D; and MDA-MB-361. Coimmunoprecipitation assay and DUOlink in situ proximity ligation were used to investigate the interaction between PKCβ1 and ERα. Results: Endx more potently inhibited PKCβ1 kinase activity compared to Tam ( IC50 350 nM vs 47.8 μM ) with KDs for PKCβ1 binding as follows: Endx (100 nM ), Tam ( 2 μM ), 4-HT ( 2 μM ) and NDMT (> 7 μM ). None of the SERMs exhibited PKCβ2 binding. In the MCF7/AC1 and MCF7/AC1 L-resistant cells, PKCβ1 knockdown resulted in ERα degradation and potently inhibited cell proliferation. These results were confirmed in T47D and MDA-MB-361 cells. Notably, PKCβ1 knockdown in MCF7/AC1 cells resulted in significantly greater E2 induced proliferation comparing siRNA knockdown vs. control. To further explore these effects, we evaluated the effects of PKCβ1 overexpression in MCF7 cells and demonstrated that PKCβ1 overexpression reduced cell proliferation and colony formation compared to parental MCF-7 cells without affecting ERα protein stability. Coimmunoprecipitation assays in transient transfected MCF-7 cells with exogenous PKCβ1 as well as PKCβ1 expressing MDA-MB-231 cells transiently or stably transfected with ERα demonstrated PKCβ1 and ERα interaction, with confirmation by Duolink assay that this interaction occurs in the cytoplasm. Conclusions: Our findings demonstrated that endoxifen binds and inhibits PKCβ1 at relevant concentrations achieved in the endoxifen clinical trial studies. PKCβ1 interacts with cytoplasmic ERα and PKCβ1 knockdown inhibits cell proliferation and enhances ERα turnover. However, in PKCβ1 overexpressing cells, PKCβ1 may exhibit tumor suppressive effects. These data suggest a complex interaction between PKCβ1 and ERα and that endoxifen's effects on PKCβ1 may alter drug response of endocrine therapy. Further studies are ongoing to characterize the role of PKCβ1 and its role in ER biology and response to endoxifen. Citation Format: Guo C, Kuffel MJ, Kudgus RA, Huang Z, Bode AM, Cheng J, Suman VJ, Reid JM, Bruinsma ES, Subramaniam M, Ames MM, Hawse JR, Goetz MP. Identification and characterization of a novel endoxifen substrate, PKCβ1, and its interaction with the estrogen receptor [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2016 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2016 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-08-03.