Citations

Abstract Background: Epidemiologic studies have suggested that metformin use is associated with cancer death reduction. The results for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) are inconsistent. Retrospective studies of cancer survival may potentially have unintended biases; due to complexities of diabetes management, metformin use exposure is commonly categorized as simply “yes/no.” Nevertheless, in part based on epidemiologic studies, there are at least 20 open cancer clinical trials that include metformin in a treatment arm. We aimed to study metformin use and survival of patients with PDAC, addressing potential inherent biases. Methods: A retrospective cohort study for the years 2000-2011 was conducted using the patient database of the Mayo Clinic Specialized Programs of Research Excellence (SPORE) in Pancreatic Cancer. 1,360 PDAC patients (59% male; mean age 67) with diabetes were studied; overall survival was the primary outcome. Initiation and duration of metformin use was carefully abstracted from medical records. Patients were categorized into 5 groups based on metformin initiation: (A) Never used, n = 908 (reference group); (B) Metformin started >1 year prior to PDAC diagnosis, n = 84; (C) Metformin started within 1 year prior to PDAC diagnosis, n = 212; (D) Metformin started <30 days post-PDAC diagnosis, n = 104; (E) Metformin started >30 days post PDAC diagnosis, n = 34. Hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (C.I.) for survival differences between groups were computed using Cox proportional hazards models, adjusting for age, sex, disease stage, body mass index, and diagnosis year group. Results: Median survival of patients in Groups B-E was 292 days compared to 308 for Group A; this was not significantly different. However, among 413 resectable patients, metformin users appeared to survive longer than non-users (782 vs. 612 days, p = 0.07). Survival in each group was 308, 245, 249, 243 and 818 days, respectively. Because Group E had already survived >30 days, a bias existed. With Group E excluded, there was no survival difference among the other 4 groups (p = 0.18). Compared to Group A, HR and 95% C.I. for metformin use were 1.08 (0.85-1.37), 0.99 (0.85-1.17), 1.04 (0.83-1.31) and 0.49 (0.33-0.74), for Group B-E, respectively. Conclusions: Our thorough analysis suggests that metformin use does not improve survival of patients with PDAC. The benefit of metformin was observed only in patients who started metformin post-PDAC diagnosis; however, there is an inherent survival bias in this group of patients. Studies of medication exposure and cancer survival warrant very careful and detailed data collection. Researchers should exercise caution when initiating clinical trials based on retrospective epidemiologic studies. Citation Format: Roongruedee Chaiteerakij, David B. Zhen, Patrick A. Burch, Kari G. Chaffee, William R. Bamlet, Ann L. Oberg, Lewis R. Roberts, Gloria M. Petersen. Metformin use does not increase survival of pancreatic cancer patients: A cautionary lesson. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 106th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2015 Apr 18-22; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(15 Suppl):Abstract nr LB-183. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2015-LB-183

Abstract Background: Hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) are heterogenous primary liver cancers with pleomorphic histologic features. We present a comprehensive genetic, genomic, transcriptomic and proteomic analysis of 203 HCCs in The Cancer Genome Atlas Program (TCGA) on behalf of the TCGA Liver analysis working group to provide a deeper understanding of the molecular features of HCCs, to classify them in a clinically-relevant manner, and to provide a public resource that identifies potential targets for emerging therapies.Results: Mutation analyses confirmed the presence of TERT promoter mutations in 40% of HCCs. The analysis also revealed the first reported germline mutation in the TERT promoter in a 30 year old male, possibly reflecting an inherited predisposition to HCC. TERT promoter mutations were enriched in hepatitis C virus infected subjects. Analyses of hepatitis B virus (HBV)-induced HCCs demonstrated recurrent integrations of HBV in the TERT locus. Thus, HBV integration may substitute for TERT promoter mutations as an alternate mechanism of telomerase activation. Other tumor suppressor genes inactivated by mutation included the cell cycle genes TP53 (32% of cases), RB1 (8%), and PTEN (3%), the Wnt/beta catenin pathway gene AXIN1 (4%), and the chromatin remodeling genes ARID1A (9%), BAP1 (6%), ARID1B (4%), ARID2 (4%), and PBRM1 (3%). The oncogene CTNNB1 was mutated in 27% of HCCs. Mutations were also found in the MTOR pathway genes, MTOR (4%), TSC2 (4%) and TSC1 (3%). The patterns of mutational signatures observed included signatures characteristic of the known carcinogens aristolochic acid and aflatoxin B1. Clustering of mRNA, miRNA, or protein expression, DNA hypermethylation and DNA copy number profiles identified five, four, two, five and three clusters, respectively. Analysis of mRNA expression data identified five groups. In particular, Group 1 was associated with Asian race, higher histologic grade, and micro- and macrovascular invasion. Integrated clustering showed a grouping of HCCs into three superclusters: iCluster 1 had a low frequency of CDKN2A silencing, lack of CTNNB1 mutation, a normal-like methylation pattern, and overexpression of proliferation marker genes; iClusters 2 and 3 had a high frequency of CDKN2A silencing, CTNNB1 mutation, and overexpression of oxidative response genes; iCluster 3 tumors had a higher degree of chromosomal instability, high frequency of 17p loss, and a highly altered methylation profile. Copy number aberrations included gains in the MYC, VEGFA, CCND1, TERT, and MET loci and losses in the TP53, RB1, ERFFI1, CDKN2A, ARID1A and PTEN loci. Discussion: Based on integrated analysis of genome, transcriptome, methylome and proteome we showed that HCCs naturally separate into three to five distinct groups with associated molecular and clinical characteristics. Importantly, we identified a novel germline mutation in the TERT promoter that may be associated with an inherited risk for HCC. Note: This abstract was not presented at the meeting. Citation Format: Lewis R. Roberts, David A. Wheeler. Comprehensive integrative characterization of hepatocellular carcinoma: The TCGA HCC project. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 106th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2015 Apr 18-22; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(15 Suppl):Abstract nr 3745. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2015-3745

Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) in blood are associated with poor survival of patients with breast, prostate, or colon cancer. We hypothesized that CTCs are associated with poor survival of patients with cholangiocarcinoma (CCA). Eighty‐eight patients with CCA were prospectively enrolled at Mayo Clinic Rochester between June 2010 and September 2014. The CellSearch system by Veridex was used for detection of CTCs in peripheral blood. Associations between CTC, patient and tumor characteristics, and survival were examined using the Cox's proportional hazards model. Fifteen patients (17%) were positive for CTC ≥2 and 8 patients (9%) for CTC ≥5. CTCs were associated with tumor extent. CTC ≥2 (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.5; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.1‐5.4; P = 0.02) and CTC ≥5 (HR, 4.1; 95% CI: 1.4‐10.8; P = 0.01) were both independent predictors of survival. In subgroup analyses, CTC ≥2 (HR, 8.2; 95% CI: 1.8‐57.5; P < 0.01) and CTC ≥5 (HR, 7.7; 95% CI: 1.4‐42.9; P = 0.02) were both associated with shorter survival among patients with metastasis. There was a trend toward association of CTC ≥5 with shorter survival in patients with nonmetastatic CCA (HR, 4.3; 95% CI: 1.0‐13.8; P = 0.06). CTC ≥2 (HR, 10.5; 95% CI: 2.2‐40.1; P < 0.01) and CTC ≥5 (HR, 10.2; 95% CI: 1.5‐42.3; P = 0.02) were both associated with shorter survival among patients with perihilar/distal CCA. CTC ≥5 was associated with shorter survival of patients with intrahepatic CCA (HR, 4.2; 95% CI: 1.1‐14.1; P = 0.04). Conclusion: CTCs were associated with more‐aggressive tumor characteristics and independently associated with survival in patients with CCA. Assessment of CTCs may be useful for identifying CCA patients at risk of early mortality. (Hepatology 2016;63:148–158)

Growing evidence suggests that pretransplant alpha‐fetoprotein (AFP) predicts outcomes of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients treated with liver transplantation. We aimed to determine whether pretransplant AFP, Lens culinaris agglutinin‐reactive alpha‐fetoprotein (AFP‐L3), and des‐gamma‐carboxyprothrombin (DCP) predicted HCC recurrence after transplantation. A retrospective cohort study of 313 HCC patients undergoing transplantation between 2000 and 2008 was conducted, and 48 (15.3%) developed recurrence during a median follow‐up of 90.8 months. The 127 patients with available serum drawn before transplantation were included; they included 86 without recurrence and 41 with recurrence. Serum was tested for AFP, AFP‐L3%, and DCP in a blinded fashion with the μTASWako i30 immunoanalyzer. All biomarkers were significantly associated with HCC recurrence. The hazard ratios (HRs) were 3.5 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.9‐6.7; P < 0.0001] for DCP ≥ 7.5 ng/mL and 2.8 (95% CI, 1.4‐5.4; P = 0.002) for AFP ≥ 250 ng/mL. The HR increased to 5.2 (95% CI, 2.3‐12.0; P < 0.0001) when AFP ≥ 250 ng/mL and DCP ≥7.5 ng/mL were considered together. When they were combined with the Milan criteria, the HR increased from 2.6 (95% CI, 1.4‐4.7; P = 0.003) for outside the Milan criteria to 8.6 (95% CI, 3.0‐24.6; P < 0.0001) for outside the Milan criteria and AFP ≥ 250 ng/mL and to 7.2 (95% CI, 2.8‐18.1; P < 0.0001) for outside the Milan criteria and DCP ≥7.5 ng/mL. Our findings suggest that biomarkers are useful for predicting the risk of HCC recurrence after transplantation. Using both biomarkers and the Milan criteria may be better than using the Milan criteria alone in optimizing the decision of liver transplantation eligibility. Liver Transpl 21:599–606, 2015. © 2015 AASLD.

Abstract Background & Aims Hepatocellular carcinoma ( HCC ) is the second most common cause of cancer deaths worldwide. The global HCC BRIDGE study was a multiregional, large‐scale, longitudinal cohort study undertaken to improve understanding of real‐life management of patients with HCC , from diagnosis to death. Methods Data were collected retrospectively from January 2005 to September 2012 by chart reviews of eligible patients newly diagnosed with HCC at participating institutions. Results Forty‐two sites in 14 countries contributed final data for 18 031 patients. Asia accounted for 67% of patients, Europe for 20% and North America for 13%. As expected, the most common risk factor was hepatitis C virus in North America, Europe and Japan, and hepatitis B virus in China, South Korea and Taiwan. The most common Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage at diagnosis was C in North America, Europe, China and South Korea, and A in Taiwan and Japan. Across all stages, first HCC treatment was most frequently transarterial chemoembolization in North America, Europe, China and South Korea, percutaneous ethanol injection or radiofrequency ablation in Japan and resection in Taiwan. Survival from first HCC treatment varied significantly by region, with median overall survival not reached for Taiwan and 60, 33, 31, 24 and 23 months for Japan, North America, South Korea, Europe and China respectively ( P < 0.0001). Conclusions Initial results from the BRIDGE study confirm previously reported regional trends in patient demographic characteristics and HCC risk factors, document the heterogeneity of treatment approaches across regions/countries and underscore the need for earlier HCC diagnosis worldwide.

Current guidelines recommend surgical resection as the primary treatment for a single hepatocellular cancer (HCC) with Child's A cirrhosis, normal serum bilirubin, and no clinically significant portal hypertension. We determined how frequently guidelines were followed and whether straying from them impacted survival. BRIDGE is a multiregional cohort study including HCC patients diagnosed between January 1, 2005 and June 30, 2011. A total of 8,656 patients from 20 sites were classified into four groups: (A) 718 ideal resection candidates who were resected; (B) 144 ideal resection candidates who were not resected; (C) 1,624 nonideal resection candidates who were resected; and (D) 6,170 nonideal resection candidates who were not resected. Median follow‐up was 27 months. Log‐rank and Cox's regression analyses were conducted to determine differences between groups and variables associated with survival. Multivariate analysis of all ideal candidates for resection (A+B) revealed a higher risk of mortality with treatments other than resection. For all resected patients (A+C), portal hypertension and bilirubin >1 mg/dL were not associated with mortality. For all patients who were not ideal candidates for resection (C+D), resection was associated with better survival, compared to embolization and “other” treatments, but was inferior to ablation and transplantation. Conclusions : The majority of patients undergoing resection would not be considered ideal candidates based on current guidelines. Not resecting ideal candidates was associated with higher mortality. The study suggests that selection criteria for resection may be modestly expanded without compromising outcomes, and that some nonideal candidates may still potentially benefit from resection over other treatment modalities. (H epatology 2015;62:440–451

In vitro studies have proposed a tumor suppressor role for sulfatase 1 (SULF1) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC); however, high expression in human HCC has been associated with poor prognosis. The reason underlying this paradoxical observation remains to be explored. Using a transgenic (Tg) mouse model overexpressing Sulf1 (Sulf1‐Tg), we assessed the effects of SULF1 on the diethylnitrosamine model of liver carcinogenesis. Sulf1‐Tg mice show a higher incidence of large and multifocal tumors with diethylnitrosamine injection compared to wild‐type mice. Lung metastases were found in 75% of Sulf1‐Tg mice but not in wild‐type mice. Immunohistochemistry, immunoblotting, and reporter assays all show a significant activation of the transforming growth factor‐β (TGF‐β)/SMAD transcriptional pathway by SULF1 both in vitro and in vivo . This effect of SULF1 on the TGF‐β/SMAD pathway is functional; overexpression of SULF1 promotes TGF‐β‐induced gene expression and epithelial–mesenchymal transition and enhances cell migration/invasiveness. Mechanistic analyses demonstrate that inactivating mutation of the catalytic site of SULF1 impairs the above actions of SULF1 and diminishes the release of TGF‐β from the cell surface. We also show that SULF1 expression decreases the interaction between TGF‐β1 and its heparan sulfate proteoglycan sequestration receptor, TGFβR3. Finally, using gene expression from human HCCs, we show that patients with high SULF1 expression have poorer recurrence‐free survival (hazard ratio 4.1, 95% confidence interval 1.9‐8.3; P = 0.002) compared to patients with low SULF1. We also found strong correlations of SULF1 expression with TGF‐β expression and with several TGF‐β‐related epithelial–mesenchymal transition genes in human HCC. Conclusion : Our study proposes a novel role of SULF1 in HCC tumor progression through augmentation of the TGF‐β pathway, thus defining SULF1 as a potential biomarker for tumor progression and a novel target for drug development for HCC. (H epatology 2015;61:1269–1283)