Citations

ImportanceThere is substantial interest in capturing cancer treatment tolerability from the patient’s perspective using patient-reported outcomes (PROs).ObjectiveTo examine whether a PRO question, item 5 from the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General General Physical Wellbeing Scale (GP5), was associated with early treatment discontinuation (ETD) due to adverse events.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis prospective survey study was conducted from February to April 2023. Among participants in the ECOG-ACRIN E1A11 trial (a phase 3, parallel design trial conducted between 2013 and 2019), patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma were randomized to receive bortezomib (VRd) or carfilzomib (KRd) plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone as induction therapy. The GP5 item was administered at baseline (pretreatment) and at 1 month, 2.8 months, and 5.5 months postbaseline. Eligible participants included patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma treated at community oncology practices or academic medical centers in the US.ExposuresGP5 response options were “very much,” “quite a bit,” “somewhat,” “a little bit,” and “not at all.” Responses at each assessment while undergoing treatment (1 month, 2.8 months, and 5.5 months) were categorized as high adverse event bother (ie, “very much,” and “quite a bit”) and low adverse event bother (ie, “somewhat,” “a little bit,” or “not at all”). In addition, change from baseline to each assessment while undergoing treatment was calculated and categorized as worsening by 1 response category and 2 or more response categories.Main Outcome and MeasureETD due to adverse events (yes vs no) was analyzed using logistic regression adjusting for treatment group, performance status, gender, race, and disease stage.ResultsOf the 1087 participants in the original trial, 1058 (mean [SD] age 64 [9] years; 531 receiving VrD [50.2%]; 527 receiving KRd [49.8%]) responded to item GP5 and were included in the secondary analysis. A small proportion (142 patients [13.4%]) discontinued treatment early due to AEs. For those with high adverse-effect bother, GP5 while undergoing treatment was associated with ETD at 1 month (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 2.20; 95% CI, 1.25-3.89), 2.8 months (aOR, 3.41; 95% CI, 2.01-5.80), and 5.5 months (aOR, 4.66; 95% CI, 1.69-12.83). Worsening by 2 or more response categories on the GP5 was associated with ETD at 2.8 months (aOR, 3.02; 95% CI, 1.64-5.54) and 5.5 months (aOR, 5.49; 95% CI, 1.45-20.76).Conclusions and RelevanceIn this survey study of the E1A11 trial, worse GP5 response was associated with ETD. These findings suggest that simple assessment of adverse-effect bother while receiving treatment is an efficient way to indicate treatment tolerability and ETD risk.

Abstract Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) is a premalignant condition characterized by plasma cell production of monoclonal (M) protein and is a requisite precursor to multiple myeloma (MM). African American (AA) individuals have a two-fold higher incidence of MGUS and MM compared to White individuals. However, data are limited on individuals from Africa, especially using sensitive MGUS detection methods. We examined the prevalence of MGUS in a sample of the general population in Nigeria. Individuals aged 40 and over (n=343) were recruited through health promotion events in Ado-Odo Ota Local Government Area of Ogun State, Nigeria, and provided informed consent, a blood sample, and a short questionnaire. Serum was screened at Mayo Clinic for heavy chain (HC)-MGUS using the matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-time of flight (Mass-Fix) assay, which has high sensitivity for detection of M-proteins; serum free light chains (FLC) were also measured. FLC was abnormal if the kappa (>0.26 mg/dL) or lambda (>0.33 mg/dL) light chain (LC) was elevated and FLC ratio (kappa/lambda) was outside the reference range (0.26-3.10). LC-MGUS was defined as an abnormal FLC in the absence of a HC. Age- and sex-adjusted prevalence rates were directly standardized to 2010 United States (US) population for comparison to published studies. Logistic regression was used to examine the association of age, sex, and BMI with HC-MGUS. The mean age of participants was 55 years (SD=10.9), and 74.6% were female. Of these, 216 (63%) had both parents from the Yoruba tribe, 89 (26%) from the Igbo tribe and 38 (11%) from other tribes. Overall, 33 participants (9.6%) had HC-MGUS, with 8 (2.3%) having an M-protein above 0.2 g/dL; 6 (1.7%) had LC-MGUS. HC-MGUS was predominantly IgG isotype (48.5%), followed by IgA (27.3%), biclonal (15.2%) and IgM (9.0%). Prevalence of HC-MGUS was 8.3% for ages 40-49, 7.7% ages 50-69 and 22% ages 70 and above. Standardized to the US population, age and sex adjusted MGUS prevalence ages 50 and older was 17.3% (95% CI: 9.8%-24.9%) and HC-MGUS was 14.7% (95% CI: 7.7%-21.8%), similar to previously published rates of HC-MGUS using Mass-Fix screening of AA individuals (16.5%, 95% CI: 12.2%-20.8%) (PMID: 35316833). In models that included age, sex and BMI, older age was positively associated with HC-MGUS (OR=3.1, 95% CI: 1.1-8.7 for ages 70+ compared to <50), while female sex (OR=0.53, 95% CI: 0.24-1.2) and overweight/obesity (OR=0.34, 95% CI: 0.16-0.75 for BMI > 25 vs. <25) were inversely associated with HC-MGUS. We observed similar prevalence of HC-MGUS at ages 50 and above among Western Nigerian and AA populations when screened using mass-spectrometry. Older age was positively associated with HC-MGUS while overweight and obesity were inversely associated. Studies of MGUS in indigenous African populations may provide insight to unique cancer risk factors compared to other populations. Citation Format: Celine M. Vachon, Cristine Allmer, Danelle Moonen, Aaron Norman, Joselle Cook, Susan Slager, Oluwakemi A. Rotimi, Opeyemi C. De Campos, Titilope M. Dokumu, David Murray, Shaji Kumar, Elizabeth Brown, Linda B. Baughn, Solomon Rotimi. Prevalence of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) in a Western Nigerian population [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 3455.

The 2023 Precision Oncology Summit was organized by Binaytara foundation in San Francisco on October 7 th and 8 th . The conference’s theme was the advances in precision oncology and future directions to move away from a one-size-fits-all model to improve outcomes. This manuscript outlines the proceedings of the hematology-focused session during the conference.

Summary: While the current approach to precursor hematologic conditions is to “watch and wait,” this may change with the development of therapies that are safe and extend survival or delay the onset of symptomatic disease. The goal of future therapies in precursor hematologic conditions is to improve survival and prevent or delay the development of symptomatic disease while maximizing safety. Clinical trial considerations in this field include identifying an appropriate at-risk population, safety assessments, dose selection, primary and secondary trial endpoints including surrogate endpoints, control arms, and quality-of-life metrics, all of which may enable more precise benefit–risk assessment.

Abstract Multiple myeloma (MM) is the most common blood cancer in African American (AA) individuals. AAs have an increased risk of developing Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance (MGUS) and MM compared to non-Hispanic White (NHW) individuals. While several studies have shown a pivotal role for the immune tumor microenvironment (iTME) in MM pathogenesis, the composition of the iTME in AAs with MM is under investigated. Viably frozen whole bone marrow (BM) aspirates from 128 individuals (53 AA and 75 NHW) with either MM (n=65), MGUS (n=28), smoldering MM (SMM, n=13), or healthy controls (n=22) were evaluated by single cell RNA-sequencing (scRNA-seq) or mass cytometry (CyTOF). We characterized 34 (14 AA and 20 NHW) by scRNA-seq and 94 (39 AA and 55 NHW) by CyTOF. CyTOF samples were stained with Maxpar Direct Immune Profiling Assay Kit (Fluidigm), acquired on a Helios mass cytometer and analyzed in Cytobank. Data were analyzed by logistic equivalent regression model with p<0.05 for significance. ScRNA-seq samples were processed as in Yao, 2022. Data were normalized using scvi-tools and clustered by Uniform manifold approximation and projection (UMAP). Differentially expressed markers between clusters were identified using Model-based Analysis of Single-cell Transcriptomics (MAST) in Seurat R package at FDR < 0.05 and log2 fold change > 0.55. ScRNA-seq of the CD45+ non-tumor lymphocytes revealed 17 immune populations (HSC, erythroblast, MDSC, GMP, CD1c+ DC, CD4+ and CD8+ T cell, CD14+ M1 macrophage, CD16+monocyte, monocyte, pDC, naïve B, pre-B, pro-B, memory B, NK/MAIT). CD3E/D+cells were clustered into naïve/central memory (CCR7+, LEF1+, SELL+), memory (GZMK+), effector (GZMB+, GZMH+, FGFBP2+), g/d (TRDC+), MAIT (SLC4A10+, KLRB1+) and IFN CD8+ T cells (IFIT1+, IFIT2+,IFIT3+). Disease progression was associated with increases in median CD4+ and CD8+ GZMK+ T cells, memory B cells and a reduction in all monocyte clusters. Within the diseased cohort in comparison to NHW patients, AA patients had increased CD3+ T cells (CD4 and CD8+) (AA 57.5% vs. NHW 44.3%) and a reduction in overall monocytes (AA 10.5% vs. 26.5%). These results were validated by CyTOF, which confirmed an increase in CD3+ T cells (AA 53.7% vs. NHW 35.7%, p<0.001) including increases in CD8+ (AA 7.0% vs. NHW 3.2%, p<0.05) and CD4+ terminal effector T cells (AA 5.7% vs. NHW 2.7%, p<0.05) and a reduction in monocytes (AA 18.3% vs. NHW 26.6%) among AAs. After adjusting for age and sex, AAs retained an increase in T cells (OR 1.59 (95%CI 1.2-2.01, p=0.00023)) and a reduction in monocytes (OR 0.88 (95%CI 0.78-1, p=0.045)). Despite the increase in CD8+ T cells in AA patients, we identified reduced GZMK+ T cells and reductions in exhaustion markers (TIGIT, LAG3, TOX) in CD8+ T cells in comparison to NHWs. Nevertheless, the distribution of the immune populations was similar between healthy AA and NHW individuals. Our multiomics approach to characterize the iTME identified significant differences among AA compared to NHW patients with MM. Citation Format: Suganti Shivaram, Hongwei Tang, Huihuang Yan, Shulan Tian, Guyu Qin, Emilie Anderson, Neeraj Sharma, Abiola Bolarinwa, Cinthya Zepeda-Mendoza, Stacey Lehman, Felicia Gomez, Amit Mitra, Surendra Dasari, Taxiarchis Kourelis, Shaji Kumar, Linda Baughn. Characterization of the Immune Tumor Microenvironment in a Diverse Cohort of Patients with Multiple Myeloma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Blood Cancer Discovery Symposium; 2024 Mar 4-6; Boston, MA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Blood Cancer Discov 2024;5(2_Suppl):Abstract nr P06.

The treatment of Waldenström macroglobulinemia/lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma (WM/LPL) has evolved to include several new options. The NCCN Guidelines for WM/LPL provide a framework on which to base decisions regarding diagnosis, treatment, assessment of response to treatment, and follow-up of both newly diagnosed and previously treated WM/LPL.

Background:Waldenström Macroglobulinemia (WM) is a rare, indolent B‐cell lymphoplasmacytic malignancy. Patient outcomes are highly heterogeneous, with a proportion of patients surviving less than 5 years (short survivors) and another proportion that survive longer than 10 years. The laboratory parameters in the currently used International Prognostic Scoring System for WM (IPSSWM) include hemoglobin, serum IgM, platelet count, and serum β2‐microglobulin.Aims:We aim to identify unique patient characteristics and prognostic features associated with short survival in WM.Methods:The medical records of patients with active WM that were diagnosed at Mayo Clinic Rochester, Arizona, and Florida between January 1st, 1996 and December 31st, 2013 were reviewed. The patients with smoldering WM were excluded. Cohorts of patients who either survived ≤ 5 years (Short Survival Group) or those with an overall survival (OS) ≥ 10 years (Long Survival Group) from the diagnosis of active disease were compared. Survivors with a follow‐up of ≤ 5 years were not included in the analyses. Two‐sided Wilcoxon rank sum test and Chi square/Fisher's exact test were used to compare the continuous and categorical variables, respectively. The variables that were statistically significant on univariate analysis (P < 0.05) were included in a multivariate logisitic regression analysis.Results:Of 893 consecutively seen WM patients (median follow‐up of 9 years [95% CI 8.4–9.7]), we identified 387 patients who could be categorized into either the Short Survival Group (n = 171 patients, 44%) or the Long Survival Group (n = 216, 56%). The Short Survival Group had a median OS of 2.4 years (2.1–2.8) and median age at diagnosis of 73 years (42–93), while the Long Survival Group (n = 216, 56%) had a median OS of 18.9 years (16‐NR) and median age at diagnosis of 62 years (31–85). The baseline characteristics and significant findings between the two groups are listed in the Table. Parameters significant on univariate analysis included age >65 years, albumin < 3.5 g/dL, β2‐microglobulin >3 μg/ml, and LDH > upper limit of normal (ULN). On multivariate analysis, albumin <3.5 g/dL and LDH > ULN were independently associated with short survival. Among the Long Survivors, 60 (28%) patients survived 15 years or more.Summary/Conclusion:Lactate dehydrogenase above the ULN and serum albumin <3.5 g/dL are independent biomarkers of short survival in WM. The MYD88 L265P status and the size of serum IgM are not prognostic in WM. Our data suggest the need for simplification of the current staging system with the use of widely available markers: serum albumin and lactate dehydrogenase.image

The treatment of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (MM) has evolved to include several new options. These include new combinations with second generation proteasome inhibitors (PI); second generation immunomodulators, monoclonal antibodies, CAR T cells, bispecific antibodies, selinexor, venetoclax, and many others. Most patients with MM undergo several cycles of remissions and relapse, and therefore need multiple lines of combination therapies. Selecting treatment options for relapsed/refractory MM requires consideration of resistance status to specific classes, and patient-specific factors such as age and other comorbidities should be considered. The NCCN Guidelines for MM provide a framework on which to base decisions regarding workup, treatment, and follow-up of newly diagnosed and previously treated MM. This manuscript outlines the recommendations from NCCN Guidelines for MM specific to relapsed/refractory disease.

Background: GLUT4 inhibition via the use of a protease inhibitor, such as nelfinavir (NEL), is an attractive therapeutic option in multiple myeloma (MM), given the dependence of MM cells on glucose. Furthermore, combining a GLUT4 inhibitor with an oxidative phosphorylation inhibitor, such as metformin (MET), may counter the possibility of therapeutic resistance to GLUT4 inhibition in MM cells, showing synergistic promise (Dalva-Aydemir et al., Clin Can Res 2015). In addition to GLUT4 inhibition, NEL also lowers the cytotoxicity resistance of MM cells against proteasome inhibitors such as bortezomib (BOR) (Driessen et al., Blood 2018). Thus, this study evaluated the safety and tolerability of repurposing MET and NEL, in combination with BOR for the treatment of relapsed/refractory MM (RRMM) that had progressed on all standard of care (SOC) therapies. Methods: This trial utilized a 3+3 dose escalation design with 3 dose levels planned for up to a maximum of six (21-day) cycles. MET was administered for 14/21 days and started at a dose of 500 mg BID with plans to be investigated at a maximum dose of 1000 mg BID. NEL was administered for 14/21 days and started at a dose of 1250 mg BID with plans to be investigated to a maximum dose of 2500 mg BID. SubQ BOR was administered on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 21-day cycle at a dose of 1.3 mg/m 2 to a portion of patients. Patients with RRMM were required to have had 2 prior lines of therapy and prior exposure to proteasome inhibitors (PIs), immunomodulators (IMiDs), and Anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies. The primary objective was to determine the maximal tolerated dose (MTD) of this combination. The secondary objective was to evaluate the safety as well as the overall response rate (ORR) of this combination. This trial was funded by the Helen Diller Family Foundation. Results: From 4/2019 until 9/2022, nine patients were accrued with a median age of 65 (range: 42-81) that received a median of 7 prior lines of therapy (Range: 6-13). All but one patient had a prior autologous stem cell transplant. Only one patient was not triple-class refractory, and 2/3 rd (n = 6) also had prior anti-BCMA therapy. The first three patients received only MET (500 mg BID) and NEL (1250 mg BID) at the first dose level for up to one cycle before experiencing progressive disease and coming off the study. Given the limited activity of MET and NEL in the initial treatment of these three patients, two subsequent amendments to the protocol allowed for the upfront addition of BOR 1.3 mg/m2 to the original combination, as well as shortened the DLT evaluation period from two cycles to just one. Thus, the following six patients received MET (500 mg BID) and NEL (1250 mg BID) at the first dose level in addition to weekly BOR at 1.3 mg/m2. Four (44%) patients experienced grade 3+ hematological AEs and six (67%) experienced grade 3+ non-hematological AEs. The most common hematologic grade 3+ AE observed was anemia (44%). The nonhematologic grade 3+ AEs observed were dyspnea, fatigue, nausea, and vomiting (11% each). None of the AEs were possibly related to treatment, suggesting good overall safety of the combination. While eight of nine patients have since died of progressive disease, no deaths were attributable to the treatment. All six patients who received BOR upfront with MET and NEL were previously refractory to BOR in prior lines of therapy; however, none had received BOR as their last line of therapy prior to accrual to this study. Four of these six patients had progressive disease after one cycle of therapy and went off study. However, the remaining two were able to receive 2 or more cycles of therapy, with one experiencing an unconfirmed minor response (MR) in the first cycle and the other experiencing stable disease (SD) for all six cycles. The patient who experienced SD was safely able to transition to a subsequent clinical trial utilizing an anti-BCMA bispecific antibody therapy and remains alive at the time of this analysis. The study was closed before accrual to the next dose level was started. Conclusions: This is the first study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of this repurposed drug combination in this very difficult-to-treat population of RRMM. While no ORR was observed, identification of biomarkers used for selection of patients with no other SOC options who could experience at least SD responses may be beneficial in allowing this combination to slow or stabilize the disease progression until other novel therapies or clinical trials are available.